DOCSLIB.ORG

DANIELLE KEATS CITRON Boston University School of Law, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215 [email protected], [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DANIELLE KEATS CITRON Boston University School of Law, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215 Dkcitron@Bu.Edu, Keatsmorris@Gmail.Com DANIELLE KEATS CITRON Boston University School of Law, 765 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, MA 02215 [email protected], [email protected] ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Boston, Massachusetts Professor of Law (July 2019-present), Fletcher Endowed Chair (induction in 2020) Courses: Information Privacy Law; Civil Procedure; Free Speech in a Digital Age Service: Chair, Workshops Committee; Committee member, Admissions Committee UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FRANCIS KING CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW, Baltimore, Maryland Morton & Sophia Macht Professor of Law (2016-2019)· Lois K. Macht Research Professor & Professor of Law (with tenure) (2009-present)· Associate Professor of Law (2008-2009)· Assistant Professor of Law (2006-2007)· Visiting Assistant Professor (2004-2006) Courses: Information Privacy Law; Introduction to Civil Procedure; Civil Procedure; Civil Procedure II; Legal Writing and Research I Honors: UMB Champion of Excellence (2018); Teacher of the Year (May 2005); Moot Court Board Recognition (Fall 2006) Service: Faculty Advisor, MARYLAND LAW REVIEW (2010-present); Clerkship Committee (member, 2016-present); Faculty Adviser, American Constitution Society chapter; Curriculum Committee (member, 2013-15); Technology Committee (Co-Chair, 2012-13), Appointments Committee (Co-Chair, 2010-2011, member, 2008); Dean’s Strategic Planning Committee (2009-10); Faculty Advisor, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY (2006-2010); Professionalism and Diversity Committee (member, 2006-08). UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL, Chicago, IL Visiting Professor of Law (mini visit scheduled for 2021) HARVARD LAW SCHOOL, Boston, MA Visiting Professor of Law (to be scheduled) FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, New York, N.Y. Visiting Professor of Law (Fall 2018) (Information Privacy Law course; Civil Rights and Civil Liberties in the Digital Age seminar). GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Washington, D.C. 1 Visiting Professor of Law (Spring 2017) (The New Discrimination: From Cyber Harassment to Scoring Systems seminar) WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, St. Louis, Missouri Dean’s Distinguished Visitor (April 20-22, 2016) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST, Amherst, Massachusetts Interdisciplinary Studies Scholar in Residence (April 4-7, 2016) FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, New York, New York Adjunct Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing (1997-2006) AWARDS 2019 MacArthur Fellow UMB 2018 Champion of Excellence 2018 Privacy for Policymakers Best Paper Award for “Sexual Privacy” 2016 Privacy for Policymakers Best Paper Award for “The Privacy Policymaking of State Attorneys General” and “Risk and Anxiety: A Theory of Data Breach Harms” (coauthored with Daniel J. Solove) Best Paper of 2016, International Association of Privacy Practitioners for “The Privacy Policymaking of State Attorneys General” Best Paper of 2014, International Association of Privacy Practitioners for “The Scored Society” (coauthored with Frank Pasquale) Top 50 World Thinkers by PROSPECT UK MAGAZINE, http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/philosophy/world-thinkers-2015-danielle-keats-citron (naming 50 “leaders in their fields, engaging in original and profound ways with the central questions of the world today—whether in economics, science, philosophy, religion or feminism. We chose them based on recommendations from our wide pool of writers and editors”). Top 50 Most Influential Marylanders, 2015, Daily Record, http://thedailyrecord.com/influential- marylanders/ PUBLICATIONS BOOK HATE CRIMES IN CYBERSPACE (Harvard University Press September 2014) 2 Excerpted in Newsweek, http://www.newsweek.com/internet-and-golden-age-bully-271800, and Slate, http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2014/10/revenge_porn_laws_sample_text_for_ state_lawmakers.html Highlighted in the “20 Best Moments for Women in 2014” by the Editors of Cosmopolitan (“law professor Danielle Keats Citron published a book on Internet harassment that has the potential to totally shift the legal landscape”) Featured as the centerpiece of an online symposium held by the BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW (October-November 2015). Cited in academic casebooks, including THE FIRST AMENDMENT (edited by Geoffrey Stone et al.), Daniel J. Solove and Paul Schwartz, INFORMATION PRIVACY LAW (5th edition); WILLIAM MCGEVERAN, PRIVACY AND DATA PROTECTION LAW (2016). Reviewed by Erwin Chemerinsky in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Martha Nussbaum in The Nation, Robin West in Jotwell, and many others: “Vividly written and carefully argued, the book is a fine account of law in this area… We should, as Citron argues, reject the facile romanticization of the Internet as the last frontier of true freedom. We should acknowledge that the Internet both facilitates expression and silences, both allows speech and muzzles it… The major contribution of Citron’s book is its lucid summary of the vast network of laws, both state and federal, that are pertinent to cyberabuse. As she shows, we can do quite a lot for victims of cyberabuse without chilling expression… Citron confronts the perpetual free-speech/First Amendment problems attendant to her family of proposals head-on, and the case she makes is persuasive… Citron makes a number of useful proposals for legal reform while convincing readers of the seriousness of the problem.”—Martha C. Nussbaum, The Nation “Danielle Citron’s Hate Crimes in Cyberspace is a breakthrough book. It has been compared, and with good reason, to Catherine MacKinnon’s Sexual Harassment of Working Women. The book makes three major contributions. All are central to furthering the equality of women and men both in cyberspace and elsewhere. The book thus serves as a blueprint for what Citron insightfully calls a new civil rights movement. It gives legal representatives and victims a roadmap for charting out legal actions that can be taken to halt the abuse being currently suffered, and to compensate for past harms. It gives state and federal legislators a menu of options for strengthening the law in this area, so that cyberspace can be a safe as well as robust domain for the expression of views on all subjects. It responds to First Amendment worries about the possibility that her proposed reforms might chill valuable speech, and it suggests paths for interested private parties who want to affect the trajectory here outside the law. It’s a tour de force and I believe it will succeed. It will change the law, change the conversation, and change attitudes toward and regarding this extraordinarily abusive and harmful behavior. It will strengthen women’s civil rights, and thus strengthen women’s equality and at core, it will be a significant step toward ensuring women’s safety in the public space of employment and education, as well as in cyberspace and the home. This is a book to celebrate, to study, to argue over, and, mostly, to use.” —Robin West, Jotwell “Citron…focuses on how online hate speech ruins lives, most often women’s lives. She cites surveys that show that 60 to 70 percent of cyber stalking victims are women, and she details cases in which women have been targeted, defamed, and threatened with rape and murder…The very same things that make the Internet such a uniquely powerful medium for freedom of speech make it a uniquely powerful medium for hate crimes…The difficult question--as always in First Amendment and most constitutional litigation--is where to draw the line. In grappling with that and offering provisional answers, Citron [does] a great service.” — Erwin Chemerinsky Chronicle of Higher Education 3 “This book sets forth a compelling argument that the internet should not be allowed to maintain its ‘Wild West’ anarchic status, because its ability to facilitate cyber-bullying outweighs the virtues of maintaining that status… Hate Crimes in Cyberspace’s main strength lies in its sustained and detailed exploration of the bizarrely convoluted, sustained and extremely hurtful nature of online abuse of individuals… Its pioneering research could and should be used to support the case for introducing a criminal offence of gender-based hate speech in various countries.”—Helen Fenwick, Times Higher Education “To be sure, police and prosecutors regularly fail to enforce existing laws when it comes to online abuse, either because they don’t take the abuse seriously or because they lack the technological skills to find the perpetrators. But while better training and more resources are certainly necessary, Citron argues persuasively that the law itself needs to evolve as well.”—Michelle Goldberg, The Nation “An impassioned call for equal rights for women on the Internet. Citron offers well-considered and modest changes to communications law and judicial procedure that could go a long way toward opening the Internet to safer and wider use by currently victimized groups. Her suggestion that anonymity online should be treated as a privilege that can be lost by violations of a site’s terms of service is particularly constructive… Frightening and infuriating, this demand for legal accountability for Internet barbarism deserves widespread exposure and serious consideration.”—Kirkus Reviews (starred review) “Citron addresses a significant, timely topic in this impressively comprehensive, expertly researched book. An excellent analysis of the social impact of Internet hate crimes.”—Lynne Maxwell, Library Journal (starred review) “There sometimes seems to be a river of hate on the internet, flowing steadily through different social media; people are often hurt, and there is no obvious end to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Online Harassment: a Legislative Solution
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLL\54-2\HLL205.txt unknown Seq: 1 11-MAY-17 15:55 ONLINE HARASSMENT: A LEGISLATIVE SOLUTION EMMA MARSHAK* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 501 II. WHY IS ONLINE HARASSMENT A PROBLEM?................ 504 R a. The Scope of the Problem ............................ 504 R b. Economic Impact .................................... 507 R i. Lost Business Opportunities ...................... 507 R ii. Swatting ........................................ 510 R iii. Doxxing ........................................ 511 R III. CURRENT LAW .......................................... 512 R a. Divergent State Law ................................. 512 R b. Elements of the Law ................................. 514 R IV. LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATIVE PROBLEMS ........ 515 R a. Police Training ...................................... 515 R b. Investigative Resources .............................. 519 R c. Prosecutorial Jurisdiction ............................ 520 R V. SOLUTION ............................................... 521 R a. Proposed Legislation ................................ 521 R b. National Evidence Laboratory ........................ 526 R c. Training Materials ................................... 526 R VI. CONCLUSION ............................................ 528 R VII. APPENDIX ............................................... 530 R I. INTRODUCTION A journalist publishes an article; rape threats follow in the comments.1 An art curator has a conversation with a visitor to her gallery;
    [Show full text]
  • NARAL Ep5 V04 20200623.Mp3
    NARAL_Ep5_v04_20200623.mp3 Jess McIntosh [00:00:00] This limited series podcast is based on the book, "The Lie that Binds" by NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue with Ellie Langford. Each episode builds on the history terminology and figureheads established in the last. So we strongly recommend that you start from episode one before jumping ahead. Brianna Wu [00:00:18] The truth is, GamerGate is less of an event and more of a playbook to use against someone you don't like. Jess McIntosh [00:00:26] This is Brianna Wu, co-founder of independent videogame studio Giant SpaceKat. Brianna Wu [00:00:32] This is the GamerGate playbook. Find someone you want to shut up. Go to their entire life. Go through all their social media posts. Investigate them and find something to attack them with. And then get an army of people online to scream from the hills about this fact which may or may not be true and destroyed their reputation. The idea is to make the cost of speaking out so high that it's easier to just remain silent. Jess McIntosh [00:00:59] The GamerGate controversy started in August 2014. Brianna Wu [00:01:01] All through 2014 my women colleagues were being basically bullied out of the industry. Jess McIntosh [00:01:09] It was set off after game developer Zoe Quinn was falsely accused by their ex-boyfriend of sleeping with a videogame journalist to garner positive reviews for their company's new game. This led to an avalanche of rape threats, doxing and death threats against Quinn, as well as women who criticized sexism in the game industry in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Massachusetts 2020 Congressional Endorsement Questionnaire
    PROGRESSIVE MASSACHUSETTS 2020 CONGRESSIONAL ENDORSEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE Candidate: Brianna Wu Office Sought: US House Representative, MA-08 Party: Democratic Website: www.briannawuforcongress.com Twitter: @BriannaWu Facebook: Facebook.com/developerbriannawu/ Email questions to [email protected]. CONFIDENTIAL SECTION 2 I. About You 1. Why are you running for office? And what will your top 3 priority pieces of legislation if elected? BW: After the election of Donald Trump, I realized I could not simply hope for a future course correction. I had to step up and do all I could to make sure it happened. Trump's election was a turning point in our society. Racism, discrimination, and the suppression of human rights seemed to become legitimized. Then, I started to look to my own congressman for leadership. I found that my congressman and my opponent, Rep. Stephen Lynch, first ran for the Massachusetts state legislature because he wanted to keep the LGBTQ community out of the Boston St. Patrick's Day parade. He promoted a ""gay panic"" legal defense for hate crimes. He voted for the Iraq War and against Obamacare. And, to say he has flip-flopped on choice would be generous. To me, his record is unacceptable and out-of-touch with Democratic values. I am running for this office because the status-quo is simply not working. We are running out of time to address the existential threats to our country and our world. We need universal healthcare, a Green New Deal, tuition-free public college, comprehensive immigration reform, universal gun safety, money out of politics, and a guarantee of LGBTQ and women's rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociotechnical Security As an Analytic Framework
    Entanglements and Exploits: Sociotechnical Security as an Analytic Framework Data & Society Research Institute Columbia University Matt Goerzen, ​ ​Elizabeth Anne Watkins, ​ Open Technology Fund Research Fellow Gabrielle Lim, ​ Abstract Unfortunately, platform-linked violence like the incidents in The rise of social media platforms has produced novel Christchurch and San Diego are not uncommon and are security threats and vulnerabilities. Malicious actors can unlikely to subside in the near future. Other forms of now exploit entanglements of once disparate technical and problematic and potentially dangerous content also social systems to target exposed communities. These proliferate. False and misleading content distributed on exploits pose a challenge to legacy security frameworks Whatsapp in India led to the murders of over two dozen drawn from technical and state-based conceptions of people in 2018 (Goel et al., 2018). The genocide of the referent objects and bounded information systems. In this Rohyinga in Myanmar was partially incited by the military paper we propose a new framework of analysis to meet this through disinformation and false accounts on Facebook challenge, Sociotechnical Security (STsec), which (Mozur, 2018). Facebook usage may also correlate with acknowledges how the interplay between actors produces higher rates of anti-refugee attacks in Germany (Müller and emergent threats to participant communities. This Schwarz 2018). Meanwhile, targeted harassment has been exploratory paper offers an overview of sociotechnical linked to self-censorship and a chilling effect on systems, explains why these threats and vulnerabilities internet-based communications (UN Office of the High require us to expand our understanding of security with Commissioner, 2017). Amnesty International in 2018, for regards to participatory technology, and how sociotechnical example, declared Twitter trolling of women a human rights security can be operationalized as a framework for analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Gamergate and Resistance to the Diversification of Gaming Culture
    64 COMMENTARY: GamerGate and resistance to the diversification of gaming culture CHERIE TODD It is reported that there are now over one billion people worldwide who play multimedia video games, and the typical ‘gamer’ stereotype (mid 20s, single, white male) no longer applies (Reilly, 2015). Games are growing increasingly more pervasive as well as more social, and are now available any time on multiple platforms (PC, Xbox and PlayStation) and devices such as smart phones and iPads. Within less than a decade, video games have gone from being a niche area of entertainment for a few, to a mass medium that appeals to people of all ages and genders. Research continues to show an increase in the number of women who are now gaming, with the genders almost reaching parity. These statistics, however, tend to focus on gaming as a whole, and ignore gender splits within particular games and/or countries, where in many online games women are often a minority. As a result of this gender imbalance, the culture of games continues to be heavily influenced by highly masculinist discourse. There is an increasing diversification of gaming culture that is occurring due to the growing popularity of games. While many perceive this to be a positive step, there are some who are resistant to these fundamental shifts and who do not want the culture of games to change. Users of the hashtag #GamerGate have been the most vocal in their resistance to these changes. In 2014 reports of GamerGate activities started to circulate more widely, becoming a topical issue in the USA where news outlets began to describe the emergence of a ‘culture war’ over the diversification of gaming culture.
    [Show full text]
  • It's About Ethics in Games Journalism? Gamergaters and Geek
    SMSXXX10.1177/2056305116672484Social Media + SocietyBraithwaite 672484research-article2016 SI: Making Digital Cultures Social Media + Society October-December 2016: 1 –10 It’s About Ethics in Games Journalism? © The Author(s) 2016 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Gamergaters and Geek Masculinity DOI: 10.1177/2056305116672484 sms.sagepub.com Andrea Braithwaite Abstract #Gamergate is an online movement ostensibly dedicated to reforming ethics in video games journalism. In practice, it is characterized by viciously sexual and sexist attacks on women in and around gaming communities. #Gamergate is also a site for articulating “Gamergater” as a form of geek masculinity. #Gamergate discussions across social media platforms illustrate how Gamergaters produce and reproduce this gendered identity. Gamergaters perceive themselves as crusaders, under siege from critics they pejoratively refer to as SJWs (social justice warriors). By leveraging social media for concern-trolling about gaming as an innocuous masculine pastime, Gamergaters situate the heterosexual White male as both the typical gamer and the real victim of #Gamergate. #Gamergate is a specific and virulent online node in broader discussions of privilege, difference, and identity politics. Gamergaters are an instructive example of how social media operate as vectors for public discourses about gender, sexual identity, and equality, as well as safe spaces for aggressive and violent misogyny. Keywords Gamergate, gaming cultures, geek masculinity, online harassment, social media At the end of August 2014, many online gaming communities situate themselves as the “real” victims, oppressed by calls erupted into vicious arguments—ostensibly about ethics in for diversity and at risk of losing “their” games to more video game journalism, but more pointedly about gender, inclusive ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Platform Justice: Content Moderation at an Inflection Point 3
    A HOOVER INSTITUTION ESSAY ON Platform Justice C ONTENT MODERATION at an INFLECTION POINT DANIELLE CITRON & QUINTA JURECIC Aegis Series Paper No. 1811 In June 2016, Facebook Vice President Andrew Bosworth circulated an internal memorandum describing the company’s mission. “We connect people,” he wrote. “Maybe someone finds love. Maybe [Facebook] even saves the life of someone on the brink of suicide. Maybe it costs a life by exposing someone to bullies. Maybe someone dies in a terrorist attack coordinated on our tools.”1 Bosworth was not speaking metaphorically. The month after he distributed the memo, Facebook was sued by the parents of five victims of terrorist attacks conducted by Hamas, which had made extensive use of the company’s platform to recruit and organize. Days before, the social media platform had inadvertently broadcast a murder over the streaming app Facebook Live. National Security, Technology, and Law and Technology, Security, National Yet the outrage Facebook weathered in the aftermath of this violence was nothing compared to the scathing criticism it endured two years later after Buzzfeed News published Bosworth’s memo. When the memo leaked in March 2018, Facebook was neck-deep in controversies over its influence on the 2016 presidential election, including the use of the platform’s ad-targeting function by Russian trolls to sow political discord and the harvesting of user data under false pretenses by the Trump-affiliated political consultancy Cambridge Analytica.2 Meanwhile, Facebook’s competitors, Twitter and Google, faced mounting criticism over their failure to curb disinformation and abusive content.3 In 2016, Bosworth’s memo might have been an awkward attempt at self-reflection.
    [Show full text]
  • Robux Gift Card Free
    ROBUX GIFT CARD FREE how do you get free robux on roblox mobihack net roblox hack The site has been called "worthless" by users such as Brianna Wu, an independent games programmer and activist. She was also specifically referencing the site's lack of any kind of real economy.[10] There have been multiple instances where money and donations were sent to ROBLOX asking for some kind of update on a game which never came to life. She has asked for the company to be more transparent in regards to this situation and stated that she will not give them any more money until they actually deliver something. free roblox accounts with robux that work not banned There are lots of resources where you can find Roblox promo codes and there are also a lot of hacks to help you get free robux. You can find Roblox promo codes in different forums and cheat sites as well. If you do choose to try out the hacks, remember that those websites can be prone to attacks and they might expose your security details which could result in your account being deleted. free robux generator no human verification 2021 In my opinion, the best and most legitimate way to get free roblox robux is to make your own. This can be time-consuming, but you can do everything yourself and make sure that you are not running into any problems. It will take a lot of time to figure out the design and layout of the webpage, but once it is completed you should easily be able to get a lot of traffic from search engines like Google.
    [Show full text]
  • The Public Eye, Winter 2017
    WINTER 2017 The Public Eye In this issue: Religious Freedom is a Progressive Value • Birth of the Alt Right • Mobilizing Misogyny • Right Moves: Interview with Jason Stahl editor’s letter BY FREDERICK CLARKSON After the November election, the growing concern among progressives about the “Alt THE PUBLIC EYE Right”—an ideology that draws together White supremacism, misogyny, antisemitism, QUARTERLY and authoritarianism in an irony- and meme-fueled movement—became a sense of emer- gency. Followers of the movement were Sieg Heiling in Washington D.C. hotels, and a spate PUBLISHER Tarso Luís Ramos of attacks against minority groups and people of color were reported across the country. It seemed as though the worst elements of President Trump’s base had emerged en masse to EDITOR mark their victory with virulent displays of intolerance. But as with confronting any threat, Kathryn Joyce effective response first requires understanding it. COVER ART Nansi Guevara In this issue, as well as in a rapidly-expanding list of online-exclusive reports, stories, and LAYOUT profiles, PRA is doing what it does best: digging into the fraught subject of the White na- Gabriel Joffe tionalist Alt Right with meticulous research and broad historical context. This edition of PRINTING The Public Eye includes two full-length features concerning the Alt Right. The first of these Red Sun Press is David Neiwert’s “Birth of the Alt Right” (pg. 4). Neiwert, who with journalist Sarah EDITORIAL BOARD Posner investigated the movement over the course of the presidential race, delves into the Frederick Clarkson • Alex DiBranco deep backstory of how the Alt Right came to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Danielle Keats Citron, Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law
    PREPARED WRITTEN TESTIMONY AND STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD FOR Danielle Keats Citron, Professor of Law, Boston University School of Law HEARING ON “Fostering a Healthier Internet to Protect Consumers” BEFORE THE House Committee on Energy and Commerce October 16, 2019 John D. Dingell Room, 2123, Rayburn House Office Building Washington, D.C. INTRODUCTION Thank you for inviting me to appear before you to testify about corporate responsibility for online activity and fostering a healthy internet to protect consumers. My name is Danielle Keats Citron. I am a Professor of Law at the Boston University School of Law. In addition to my home institution, I am an Affiliate Faculty at the Berkman Klein Center at Harvard Law School, Affiliate Scholar at Stanford Law School’s Center on Internet & Society, Affiliate Fellow at Yale Law School’s Information Society Project, and Tech Fellow at NYU Law’s Policing Project. I am also a 2019 MacArthur Fellow. My scholarship focuses on privacy, free speech, and civil rights. I have published more than 30 articles in major law reviews and more than 25 opinion pieces for major news outlets.1 My book Hate Crimes in Cyberspace tackled the phenomenon of cyber stalking and what law, companies, and society can do about it.2 As a member of the American Law Institute, I serve as an adviser on Restatement (Third) Torts: Defamation and Privacy and the Restatement (Third) Information Privacy Principles Project. In my own writing and with coauthors Benjamin Wittes, Robert Chesney, Quinta Jurecic, and Mary Anne Franks, I have explored the significance of Section 230 to civil rights and civil liberties in a digital age.3 * * * Summary: In the early days of the commercial internet, lawmakers recognized that federal agencies could not possibly tackle all noxious activity online.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online
    ACL 2017 The First Workshop on Abusive Language Online Proceedings of the Workshop August 4, 2017 Vancouver, Canada Sponsors Primary Sponsor Malcolm S. Forbes Center for Culture and Media Studies Platinum Sponsors Gold Sponsors Silver Sponsors Bloomberg ii c 2017 The Association for Computational Linguistics Order copies of this and other ACL proceedings from: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) 209 N. Eighth Street Stroudsburg, PA 18360 USA Tel: +1-570-476-8006 Fax: +1-570-476-0860 [email protected] ISBN 978-1-945626-66-1 iii Introduction We are very pleased to welcome you to the first Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW), held at ACL 2017 in Vancouver, Canada. The last few years have seen a surge in abusive behavior online, with governments, social media platforms, and individuals struggling to cope with the consequences and to produce effective methods to combat it. In many cases, online forums, comment sections, and social media interactions have become sites for bullying, scapegoating, and hate speech. These forms of online aggression not only poison the social climate of the online communities that experience it, but can also provoke physical violence and harm. Addressing abusive language necessitates a multidisciplinary approach that requires knowledge from several fields, including, but not limited to: media studies, natural language processing (NLP), psychology, sociology, law, gender studies, communications, and critical race theory. NLP, as a field that directly works with computationally analyzing language, is in a unique position to develop automated methods to analyse, detect, and filter abusive language. By working across disciplinary divides, researchers in all these fields can produce a comprehensive approach to abusive language that blends together computational, social and legal methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Fighting Cybercrime After United States V. Jones David Gray
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 103 | Issue 3 Article 4 Summer 2013 Fighting Cybercrime After United States v. Jones David Gray Danielle Keats Citron Liz Clark Rinehart Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation David Gray, Danielle Keats Citron, and Liz Clark Rinehart, Fighting Cybercrime After United States v. Jones, 103 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 745 (2013). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol103/iss3/4 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/13/10303-0745 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 103, No. 3 Copyright © 2013 by David Gray, Danielle Keats Citron & Liz Clark Rinehart Printed in U.S.A. FIGHTING CYBERCRIME AFTER UNITED STATES V. JONES DAVID GRAY,* DANIELLE KEATS CITRON** & LIZ CLARK RINEHART*** In a landmark nondecision last term, five Justices of the United States Supreme Court would have held that citizens possess a Fourth Amendment right to expect that certain quantities of information about them will remain private, even if they have no such expectations with respect to any of the information or data constituting that whole. This quantitative approach to evaluating and protecting Fourth Amendment rights is certainly novel and raises serious conceptual, doctrinal, and practical challenges. In other works, we have met these challenges by engaging in a careful analysis of this “mosaic theory” and by proposing that courts focus on the technologies that make collecting and aggregating large quantities of information possible.
    [Show full text]