4. REFERENCES (CW) a Abdel-Rehim O

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Advanced Metal Detectors Dr. Serkan Aksoy 4. REFERENCES (CW) A Abdel-Rehim O. A., Davidson J. L., Marsh L. A., O’Toole M. D. , Peyton A. J., (2016), Magnetic polarizability tensor spectroscopy for low metal anti-personnel mine surrogates, IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 16-10, 3775-3783. AETC, (1999), Processing techniques for discrimination between buried UXO and clutter using multi-sensor array data, SERDP Annual Report, CU-1121. Alfrod A., Kandoian A. G., (1940), Ultrahigh-frequency loop antennas, AIEE Transactions, 59, 843-848. Alumbaugh D. L., Newman G. A., Prevost L., Shadid J. N., (1996), Three-dimensional wideband electromagnetic modeling on massively parallel computers, Radio Science, 31-1, 1-23. Ambrus D, Vasic D, Bilas V., (2013), Active induction balance method for metal detector sensing head utilizing transmitter-bucking and dual current source, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 450-1,1-6. Antonio J., Sandoval A., (2012), Los Detectores de Metales en Áreas Históricas: The Metal Detectors in Historic Areas, Trafford Publishing. Ao C. O., Braunisch H., Neil K. O., Kong J. A., Tsang L., Johnson J. T., (2001), Broadband electromagnetic induction response from conducting and permeable spheroids, Proc. SPIE, 4394, 1304-1315. Austin B. A., Boswell A., Perks M. A., (2014), Loss mechanisms in the electrically small loop antenna, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 56-4, 142-147 (with comment and reply in 2015 issue). Awadalla K. H., Sharshar A. A., (1984), A simple method to determine the impedance of a loop antenna, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, 32-11, 1248-1251. B Balanis C. A., (1997), Antenna Theory - Analysis and Design, 2th Edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc. Balanis C. A., (2005), Antenna Theory - Analysis and Design, 3th Edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc. Barrow B., Khadr N., DiMarco R., Nelson H. H., Chekcheyev S., (1998), Metal Detector, Patent of Ukraine, No: 31296. Bartoli M., Reatti A., Kazimierczuk M. K., (1994), High-frequency models of ferrite core inductors, 20th Int. Conf. on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation, 5-9 September, 1670-1675. Baum C. E., (1999), Detection and Identification of Visually Obscured Targets, Taylor & Francis. Barrick D. E., (1986), Miniloop antenna operation and equivalent circuit, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, 34-1, 111-114. Barrow B., Bell T. H., Miller J., (2000), Characterization studies of the electromagnetic induction response of compact metallic objects for improved unexploded ordnance, 13th EEGS Symp. on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 20 February, 819-828. Boura A., (2016), Single-coil metal detector limits, Electroscope, 1-4. Bell T. H., Barrow B. J., Miller J. T., (2001), Subsurface discrimination using electromagnetic induction sensors, IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39-6, 1286-1293. Bergeler S., Ewald H., Krambeer H., Kubota E., (2005), Optical position monitoring using spatial filters for improved magnet-inductive prospection of metal pieces, Proc. SPIE, 5826, 679-686. Besser Associates, Applied RF Techniques Course, 480 San Antonio Road, Mountain View, CA. 94040 Bevan, B., (1983), Geophysical exploration for archaeology: An introduction to geophysical exploration. Midwest Archaeological Center Special Report 1. Bier G., Richards R., (1999), Detector training: It’s more than lecture and familiarization, Engineer, November, 46-49. Bladel J. G. V., (1960), Good conductors in low-frequency fields, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, 10-5, 625-633. Blazek P., (2010), Intelligent Metal Detector, Bachelor Thesis, Czech Technical University in Prague. Boswell A., Tyler A. J., White A., (2015), Performance of a Small Loop Antenna in the 3 - 1 0 MHz Band, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 47-2, 51-5 6 . Bozorth R. M., Chapin D. M., (1942), Demagnetizing factors of rods, Journal of Applied Physics, 13-5, 320- 326. Braunisch H., Ao C. O., O’Neill K., Kong J. A., (2000), Magnetoquasistatic response of a distribution of small conducting and permeable objects, IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS '00), 4, 1424-1426, 24-28 July, Honolulu, HI, USA. Advanced Metal Detectors Dr. Serkan Aksoy Bruschini C., (1997), Evaluation of a commercial visualizing metal detector for UXO-mine detection: the HILTI ferroscan system, International Workshop on Sustainable Humanitarian Demining (SusDem 97), 6.18-6.27, Zagrep, Crotaria. Bruschini C., Gros B., (1997), A survey of current sensor technology research for the detection of land mines, International Workshop on Sustainable Humanitarian Demining (SusDem 97), 6.18-6.27, Zagrep, Crotaria. Bruschini C., Sahli H., (2000), Phase-angle-based EMI object discrimination and analysis of data from a commercial differential two-frequency system, Proc. SPIE, 4038, 1404-1419. Buschow K.H.J., (2009), Handbook of Magnetic Materials, Vol. 18, Elsevier B. V. C +Candy B., (2000), Metal Detector Basics and Theory, Technical Notes, Minelab. +Cargile D. M., Bennett H. H., Goodson, R. A., DeMoss T. A., Cespedes E. R., (2004), Advanced UXO Detection-Discrimination Technology Demonstration- Kaho'olawe Hawaii, Technical Report, Environmental Laboratory, U. S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, USA. Carin L., (2000), On the wideband EMI response of buried UXO, UXO/Countermine Forum, May 1-5, Anaheim, CA Carin L., Won I. J., Keiswetter D., (1999), Wideband frequency- and time-domain EMI for mine detection, Proc. SPIE, 3710, 14-25. Chekcheyev S., (1998), Metal Detector, Patent of Ukraine, No: 31296. +Caruso M. J., (1998), A new perspective on magnetic field sensing, Sensors, 34-45. + Cauterman M., Martin J. L., Degauque P., Gabillard R., (1979), Numerical modeling for electromagnetic remote sensing of inhomogeneities in the ground, Proceeding of the IEEE, 67-7, 1009-1015. + Caverly R., Breed G., Cantrell W. H., Eron M., Garcia J. A., Kondrath N., Ruiz D. M. N., Walker J. L. B., (2015), Advancements at the lower end - Advances in HF, VHF, and UHF systems and technology, IEEE Microwave Magazine, 16-1, 28-49. +Chekcheyev S., (2009), Temperature stable metal detector, IEEE Trans. on Inst. & Meas., 58-6, 1907- 1910. +Chilakaa S. V., Riggsa L. S., Nelsonb H. H., Bellc T. H., (2004), Extremely low frequency response (below 30 Hz) of UXO-like objects, Proc. SPIE, 5415, 1280-1291. Connor M., Scott D. D., (1998), Metal detector use in archaeology - An introduction, Historical Archaeology, 32-4, 76-85. Contaxes N., Hatch A. J., (1969), High-frequency fields in solenoidal coils, Journal of Applied Physics, 40- 9, 3548-3550. Coggon J. H., (1971), Electromagnetic and electrical modeling by finite-element method, Geophysics, 36, 132-155. D Dalichaouch Y., Whitecotton B., McManus T., Kuhn S., Trammell H., Shelby R., Carin L., (2004), Wide frequency response of low metal mines, Proc. SPIE, 5415, 275-282. +Daniels D. J., (2008), UWB radar for the detection of buried ordnance, NATO/OTAN Report. Das Y., Toews J. D., (1996), Issues in performance evaluation of metal detectors, Canadian Centre for Mine Action Technologies, 1-17. Devore R., Bohley P., (1977), The electrically small magnetically loaded multiturn loop antenna, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, 25-4, 496-505. E Ewald H., (2011), Electromagnetic Induction, Chapter 4 in Subsurface Sensing, Editors: A. S. Türk, A. K. Hocaoğlu, A. A. Vertiy, Wiley Publication. Ewald H., Kruger H., (2005), Inductive sensors and their applications in metal detection, 1st Int. Conf. on Sensing Technologies, 21-23 November, 567-572, Palmesrston North, New Zeland. F Advanced Metal Detectors Dr. Serkan Aksoy Fails E. B., Torrione P. A., Scott W. R., Collins L. M., (2007), Performance of a four parameter model for modeling landmine signatures in frequency domain wideband electromagnetic induction detection system, Proc. SPIE, 6553, 1-8. Fair-Rite Rods 4077484611, 77 Rod, http://www.fair-rite.com/product/rods-4077484611/. Flind E., (1980), Magnum metal detectors, Everyday Practical Electronics, Wimbourne Publishing, 1-11. Fortress Technology Inc., (1997), Metal Detector Basic and Theory, Scarborough, ON, Canada, 1997. +Fortress, (1999), Metal Detector Basics, v2-1, Technical Notes. Friss H. T., (1925), A new directional receiving system, Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 13- 6, 685 – 707. Fuller B. D., (1971), Electromagnetic response of a conducting sphere surrounded by a conductive shell, Geophysics, 36, 9-24. G Galejs J., (1969), Antennas in Inhomogeneous Media, Pergamon Press. Gao P., Collins L., Moulton J., Makowsky L., Weaver R., Keiswetter D., Won I. J., (1999), Enhanced detection of land mines using broadband EMI data, Proc. SPIE, 3710, 2-13. Gao P., Collins L., Garber P. M., Geng N., Carin L.,(2000), Classification of landmine-like metal targets using wideband electromagnetic induction, IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38, 1352-1361. Garrett L. C., (2002), Modern Metal Detectors, RAM Publishing. Geng N., Garger P., Collins L., Carin L., (1998), Wideband electromagnetic induction for metal-target identification - Theory, measurement and signal processing, Proc. SPIE, 3392, 42-51. Geng N., Baum C. E., Carin L., (1999), On the low-frequency natural responses of conducting and permeable target, IEEE Trans. on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 37-1, 347-359. Goggans P. M., Liu Q., (2015), A complex-envelope FDTD formulation using alternating in-phase and quadrature field variables, IEEE Trans. on Antennas and Propagation, 63-11, 5169-5175. Grant F.S., West G. F., (1965), Interpretation
Recommended publications
  • The University of Queensland Inductive Position Sensing of Power Cables for Autonomous Vehicle Navigation

    The University of Queensland Inductive Position Sensing of Power Cables for Autonomous Vehicle Navigation

    The University of Queensland Inductive Position Sensing of Power Cables for Autonomous Vehicle Navigation by Alexander David Goodsell 43533149 School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, The University of Queensland. Submitted for the degree of Bachelor of Engineering (Honours) and Master of Engineering Supervised by Dr Konstanty Bialkowski June 27, 2019. iii To Noel, from whom I learned my passion for electronics. Acknowledgments I wish to acknowledge the assistance provided by Dr Konstanty Bialkowski for the academic aspects of this thesis. I am particularly grateful for the support and guidance provided by Dr Erik Isokangas, and would like to extend my gratitude to all the staff at Mining3. Finally, I wish to thank my parents for their unconditional support and encouragement throughout my studies. iv Executive Summary Mining3 has responded to rising fuel and labour prices [1], stricter ventilation re- quirements in underground mines [2] and the shift towards a \green" future [1] by proposing an all-electric, autonomously controlled hauling truck called the AEH, to replace conventional and comparitively inefficient [3] diesel trucks. All existing solutions in the mining sector only address one of the aforementioned problems | from retrofitting autonomous control solutions [4], autonomous diesel- electric hybrids [5] and trolley-assist systems [6], no one technology provides a solu- tion to all three of these issues. Enter the AET | the goal is to reduce operations cost by utilising autonomous control and efficient electric drivetrains, while minimising capital cost by employing a dynamic wireless power transfer system (WPTS) which reduces the need for large battery storage on the haulers, saving cost and weight [7].
  • Eddy Current Displacement Sensor with LTCC Technology

    Eddy Current Displacement Sensor with LTCC Technology

    Eddy Current Displacement Sensor with LTCC Technology Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Fakultät für Angewandte Wissenschaften der Albert-Ludwigs Universität Freiburg im Breisgau vorgelegt von Yuqing Lai 2005 Dekan: Prof. Dr. J.G. Korvink Referenten: Prof. Dr. J. Wilde, Prof. Dr. C. Ament Datum der Promotion: 22. 03. 2005 To yongfeng CONTENTS 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 2 State of the art...................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Importance of and developments in blades vibration monitoring ............... 5 2.2 Conventional displacement sensors.............................................................. 6 2.3 High temperature properties of sensors........................................................ 9 2.4 Introduction of the planar coil technology ................................................. 10 3 Aim of research and some basic principles and concepts............................. 12 3.1 Aim of the work .......................................................................................... 12 3.2 The concept and principle of an eddy current sensor................................. 12 3.2.1 The theory of eddy currents.................................................................... 13 3.2.2 Testing principle for turbine blades........................................................ 16 3.3 Introduction to LTCC technology .............................................................
  • I NEW APPROACHES for UTILIZING PLANAR INDUCTIVE SENSORS FOR

    I NEW APPROACHES for UTILIZING PLANAR INDUCTIVE SENSORS FOR

    NEW APPROACHES FOR UTILIZING PLANAR INDUCTIVE SENSORS FOR GAP MEASUREMENT PROXIMITY AND LUBRICANT OIL WEAR DEBRIS MONITORING A Dissertation Presented to The Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dian Jiao May, 2021 i NEW APPROACHES FOR UTILIZING PLANAR INDUCTIVE SENSORS FOR GAP MEASUREMENT PROXIMITY AND LUBRICANT OIL WEAR DEBRIS MONITORING Dian Jiao Dissertation Approved: Accepted: Advisor Department Chair Dr. Jiang Zhe Dr. Sergio Felicelli Committee Member Interim Dean of the College Dr. Jae-Won Choi Dr. Craig Menzemer Committee Member Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Shengyong Wang Dr. Marnie Saunders Committee Member Date Dr. Hongbo Cong Committee Member Dr. Yi Pang ii ABSTRACT Planar inductive sensors have been widely used in non-contact displacement measurement applications. Due to their advantages such as low cost, easy installation, high accuracy, and stability in harsh environments, planar inductive sensors are typically used to measure turbine blade tip clearance, the displacement of metal parts in belts, and the movement of robots/manipulators. However, the planar inductive sensors has a lot of limitations. First, when the material, size, or shape of the target is changed, the calibration curve needs to be rebuilt since the eddy current varies in different materials. Second, the inductive sensor which has a high sensitivity always needs a high frequency excitation signal. This means that when using the inductive sensor in industrial applications, several high performance support instruments need to be used with the sensor, such as high sampling rate data acquisition system and multi-channel power source.
  • A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron

    A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Akron

    FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING DISPLACEMENT MEASUREMENT USING PLANAR INDUCTIVE SENSORS A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Mechanical Engineering Xueyang Yu May, 2020 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING DISPLACEMENT MEASUREMENT USING PLANAR INDUCTIVE SENSORS Xueyang Yu Thesis Approved: Accepted: Advisor Department Chair Dr. Jiang Zhe Dr. Sergio Felicelli Committee Member Interim Dean of the College Dr. Xiaosheng Gao Dr. Craig Menzemer Committee Member Acting Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Kwek Tze Tan Dr. Marnie Saunders Date ii ABSTRACT Non-contacting displacement/distance sensors are widely used for position measurement to ensure the performance of the system, especially when the target surface is hard for sensor setup. Inductive planar displacement sensors are widely used to measure the position of the object in terms of measuring the equivalent inductance of the sensing planar coil. Compared to other types of non-contacting displacement sensors, including optical, microwave and capacitive sensors, inductive displacement sensors are less sensitive to environmental factors, easy installing in narrow space, robust, and low cost. Nevertheless, the output of the inductive planar coil (i.e., the equivalent inductance) can be affected by the material and the shape of the target, high-temperature and the tilt angle of the object. I used FEA method to simulate the eddy current on the targets and the equivalent inductance of the sensing coil with different materials, shapes, environment temperatures and target tilt angles. First, the eddy current distribution on various targets of different materials and shapes was analyzed to prove the hypothesis that the eddy current distribution on the target can be modeled as a ring-shaped virtual coil.
  • Link to Pdf of Thesis

    Link to Pdf of Thesis

    Chapter 1: Introduction 1.1 INDUCTIVE PROXIMITY AND DISTANCE SENSORS Inductive sensors have been developed commercially as proximity and distance sensors for years. Based on Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction, V = -N(df/dt), these sensors transfer the magnetic information related to the proximity or distance between the sensor and a target to an electrical signal. Faraday’s law implies that the varying magnetic flux in a coil with N turns will generate a voltage V at the two ends of the coil. Thus, the basic component of inductive sensors is a coil which generates a magnetic field in front of the sensor and monitors the magnetic field variation when a ferromagnetic or conducting target approaches [1]. For a ferromagnetic target, the reluctance of the magnetic path consisting of the coil and the target decreases and hence the inductance of the coil increases when the distance between the sensor and the target decreases. The magnetic field of a coil sensing a ferromagnetic target is illustrated in Figure 1.1(a). For a conducting target, the magnetic field emerging from the coil induces an eddy current in the approaching target surface. The eddy current creates an opposing magnetic field which is absorbed by the coil according to Ampere’s law. Figure 1.1(b) shows the magnetic field of an eddy current sensor. This phenomenon results in a decrease of the inductance of the coil. Therefore, we can measure the inductance of the coil to tell the distance between the coil and the target. The eddy current inductive sensors are more widely applied in industry since the magnetic 1 field of these sensors penetrates the target only to the level of the orders of skin depth d, which is approximately equal to 1/ pfsm , where m and s are the permeability and conductivity of the target, respectively, and f is the frequency of the electromagnetic field.
  • Induction Coil Sensors – the Review

    Induction Coil Sensors – the Review

    Induction Coil Sensors – a Review Slawomir Tumanski, Member, IEEE Abstract – The induction coil sensors (called also search coils, pickup coils There are more examples of the renaissance of various coil sensors. or magnetic loop sensors) are described. The design methods of air coils The Chattock-Rogowski coil was first described in nineteenth century, and ferromagnetic core coils are compared and summarized. The in 1887 [4,5]. Today, in twenty first century, this sensor is re- frequency properties of the coil sensors are analyzed and various methods discovered as excellent current transducer [6] and sensor used in of output signal processing are presented. Special kinds of induction sensors, as Rogowski coil, gradiometer sensors, vibrating coil sensors, measurements of magnetic properties of soft magnetic materials [7]. tangential field sensors and needle probes are described. The application of The old Austrian patent from 1957 [9] describing the use of needle coil sensor as magnetic antenna is presented. sensor (called also stylus or probe) for investigation of local flux density in electrical steel was rediscovered several years ago [10,11]. Index Terms – coil sensor, magnetic field measurement, search coil, The main goal of this paper is to summarize the existing knowledge Rogowski coil, vibrating coil, gradiometer, integrator circuit, H-coil about induction coil sensors, including old, often forgotten sensor, needle probe method. publications, as well as new developments. It is organized as follows: two main designs of coils sensor (air coil and core coil) are described. I. INTRODUCTION Then, their frequency response is analyzed taking into account sensors The induction coil sensor [1,2] (called also search coil sensor, and output electronics.
  • Training Manual Inductive Sensors

    Training Manual Inductive Sensors

    Training manual Inductive Sensors º´«·¼ •»²•±®• ¿²¼ ¼·¿¹²±•¬·½ •§•¬»³• °±•·¬·±² •»²•±®• ¿²¼ ±¾¶»½¬ ®»½±¹²·¬·±² ¾«•ô ·¼»²¬·º·½¿¬·±² ¿²¼ ½±²¬®±´ •§•¬»³• 1 Training manual You will find further information, data sheets, prices etc. at: www.ifm-electronic.com Training manual Inductive proximity switches (March 2003) C:\lokal\s100e.doc10.01.07 11:55 Guarantee note This manual was written with the utmost care. However, we cannot assume any guarantee for the contents. Since errors cannot be avoided despite all efforts we appreciate your comments. We reserve the right to make technical alterations to the products so that the contents of the training manual may differ in this respect. 2 Induticve Sensors Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1Proximity switches in industrial processes5 1.2Notation7 1.3On the contents7 2Basics 9 2.1Electromagnetic induction9 3Features of inductive proximity switches12 3.1Comparison12 3.1.1Limitation12 3.1.2Mechanical and electronic switches13 3.2Technology and operating principle15 3.2.1Basic inductive sensor15 3.2.2Signal generation19 3.2.3Evaluation21 3.3Practical use23 3.3.1Operating distance23 3.3.2Hysteresis28 3.3.3Correction factors30 3.3.4Switching times and switching frequency34 3.3.5Notes on practical use39 3.4Mounting instructions41 3.4.1Flush / Non flush41 3.4.2Mutual interference44 3.4.3Mechanical stability46 3.5Technology and operating principle K1, K048 3.5.1Designations48 3.5.2Conventional inductive sensor48 3.5.3Sensor with K = 151 3.5.4Sensor with K = 054 3 Training manual 4 Inductive proximity switches