DOCSLIB.ORG

Anne-Marie Slaughter

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Anne-Marie Slaughter ANNE-MARIE SLAUGHTER Office of the Dean • Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs • Princeton University 424 Robertson Hall • Princeton, NJ 08544-1013 PHONE (609) 258-4800 • E-MAIL [email protected] PRESENT POSITIONS Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Princeton University Bert G. Kerstetter '66 University Professor of Politics and International Affairs Princeton University EDUCATION OXFORD UNIVERSITY D.Phil. in International Relations, 1992 Dissertation Topic: "Conceptions of the German Question in West German Domestic Politics, 1975-1985" HARVARD LAW SCHOOL J. D. cum laude, 1985 OXFORD UNIVERSITY M.Phil. in International Relations, 1982 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY A.B. magna cum laude, 1980 Majors: Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs European Cultural Studies Anne-Marie Slaughter Page 1 of 15 EMPLOYMENT 2007-2008 Visiting Fellow Shanghai Institute for International Studies 1994-2002 J. Sinclair Armstrong Professor of International, Foreign & Comparative Law Harvard Law School 1997-2002 Director, Graduate and International Legal Studies Harvard Law School 1999-2002 Faculty Director, Harvard Colloquium on International Affairs 2001-2002 Professor John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University 1993-94 Professor of Law and International Relations University of Chicago Law School Spring 1993 Visiting Professor of Law Harvard Law School 1989-93 Assistant Professor of Law and International Relations University of Chicago Law School 1988-89 Fellow in International Law Harvard Law School 1984-88 Assistant to Professor Abram Chayes: Legal assistance on a variety of international cases, including litigation involving Nicaragua, the Philippines, Egypt, and the Marshall Islands. Selecting and editing materials on strategic weapons management (1985) Writing and editing materials for a course in International Legal Process (1985) 1986-87 Assistant to Professor Hal S. Scott Legal assistance on cases and academic studies involving U.S. and foreign banking law 1985-86 Ford Fellow in European Society and Western Security, The Center for International Affairs, Harvard University 1984 Summer Associate Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, New York, NY Anne-Marie Slaughter Page 2 of 15 1983 Summer Associate Bingham, Dana & Gould, Boston, MA 1979 Summer Intern Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Washington DC HONORS Thomas Jefferson Medal in Law, University of Virginia and the Thomas Jefferson Foundation, 2007 Doctor of Laws honoris causa, University of Miami School of Law, 2006 Whig-Clio Distinguished Service Award, Princeton University Whig-Cliosophic Society, 2006 Women in Foreign Policy Honoree, Foreign Policy Association, 2005 Finalist, Lionel Gelber Prize, 2005 Dr. Jean Mayer Global Citizenship Award, Tufts Institute for Global Leadership, 2003 Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences Francis Deak Prize, awarded by the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW for International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda (prize shared with Steven Ratner), 1994 Allen Chair Professor, T.C. Williams School of Law, University of Richmond, 1994 Francis Deak Prize, awarded by the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW for The Alien Tort Statute and Judiciary Act of 1789: A Badge of Honor, 1990 Russell Baker Scholar, University of Chicago Law School, 1990 Certificate of Distinction in Teaching, Harvard-Danforth Center for Teaching and Learning, 1984 Princeton University Daniel M. Sachs Memorial Scholarship (for two years of study at Oxford University) Phi Beta Kappa, 1980 Woodrow Wilson School R.W. van de Velde Award, 1979 Anne-Marie Slaughter Page 3 of 15 INVITED LECTURES Convocation Day Speaker, Emmanuel College, 2008 G. Theodore Mitau Endowed Lecture, Macalester College, February 2006 Robert L. Levine Distinguished Lecture Series, Fordham Law School, September 2005 Distinguished Scholar-in-Residence, Temple University Institute for International Law and Public Policy, January 2004. McCloy Professorship (two public lectures), Amherst College, 2003-2004 Alec Roche Lecture in Public International Law, New College, Oxford, November 2003 Thomas F. Ryan Memorial Lecture, Georgetown University Law Center, October 2003 President’s Lecture, American Society of International Law, An American Vision of International Law? April 2003. Pax Americana, Brown University, March 2003 Harold Jacobson Lecture in International Law, University of Michigan, November 2002 Millennial Lectures, Hague Academy of International Law, Summer 2000 Invited Lecturer, Nordic Academy of International Law, Summer 2000 BOOKS AND JOURNAL SYMPOSIA The Idea that Is America: Keeping Faith with Our Values in a Dangerous World, Basic Books, 2007. A New World Order, Princeton University Press, March 2004. The Methods of International Law (edited with Steven R. Ratner), American Society of International Law Studies in Transnational Legal Policy, 2004. International Law and International Relations Theory: Millennial Lectures, Hague Academy of International Law, Summer 2000. Legalization and World Politics: A Special Issue of International Organization, Judith Goldstein, Miles Kahler, Robert O. Keohane, and Anne-Marie Slaughter, eds., 54 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION (2000). Symposium on Method in International Law: A Special Issue of the American Journal of International Law, Steven R. Ratner and Anne-Marie Slaughter, eds., 93 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (1999). THE EUROPEAN COURTS AND NATIONAL COURTS: DOCTRINE AND JURISPRUDENCE (Anne-Marie Slaughter, Alec Stone Sweet, and Joseph H.H. Weiler, eds., 1997). Anne-Marie Slaughter Page 4 of 15 ARTICLES America’s Edge: Power in the Networked Century, 88 FOREIGN AFFAIRS 94 (2009). Wilsonianism in the Twenty-first Century, in CRISIS OF AMERICA’S FOREIGN POLICY (G. John Ikenberry, ed.) (2009). Calling All Patriots: The Cosmopolitan Appeal of American Nationalism, with Thomas N. Hale, in CULTURAL POLITICS (David Held and Henrietta L. Moore, eds.) (2008). Strategic Leadership: Framework for a 21st Century National Security Strategy, with Bruce W. Jentleson, Ivo H. Daalder, Antony J. Blinken, Lael Brainard, Kurt M. Campbell, Michael A. McFaul, James C. O’Brien, Gayle E. Smith, and James B. Steinberg, The Phoenix Initiative, Center for a New American Security, 2008. The Future of International Law is Domestic, with William Burke-White, in NEW PERSPECTIVES ON THE DIVIDE BETWEEN INTERNATIONAL AND NATIONAL LAW (Andre Nolkaemper and Janne Nijman, eds.) (2007). The American Idea is an Idea: Unexceptionalism, THE ATLANTIC (November 2007). Silent Reform through the Global Conpact, with Thomas N. Hale and George Kell, 44 (1) UN CHRONICLE (2007). Iraq Symposium, DISSENT 97 (Winter 2007). The Legacy of Elihu Root: Rereading Root in PROCEEDINGS OF THE 100TH ANNUAL MEETING (American Society of International Law, 2006). Forging a World of Liberty under Law: U.S. National Security in the 21st Century, with G. John Ikenberry, Princeton Project on National Security, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, 2006. Networking Goes International: An Update, with David Zaring, 2 ANNUAL REVIEW OF LAW AND SOCIAL SCIENCE 211 (2006). The Future of International Law is Domestic (or, The European Way of Law), with William Burke-White, 47 HARVARD INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 327 (2006). Transparency: Possibilities and Limitations, with Thomas N. Hale, 30 THE FLETCHER FORUM OF WORLD AFFAIRS 153 (2006). Reinventing the United Nations in WITH ALL OUR MIGHT (Will Marshall, ed., Randolph Court and Kevin Croke, assoc. eds., 2006). The Global Governance Crisis, 4 THE INTERDEPENDENT 32 (2006). A New U.N. for a New Century: The Robert L. Levine Distinguished Lecture Series, 74 FORDHAM LAW REVIEW 2961 (2006). Notes and Comments: Security, Solidarity, and Sovereignty: The Grand Themes of UN Reform, 99 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 619 (2005). Anne-Marie Slaughter Page 5 of 15 A Covenant to Make Global Governance Work, with Thomas N. Hale, OPEN DEMOCRACY <http://www.opendemocracy.net/globalization-vision_reflections/covenant_3141.jsp> (December 21, 2005). Declare War, with Leslie H. Gelb, 296 THE ATLANTIC MONTHLY 54 (2005). Why States Create International Tribunals: A Response to Professors Posner and Yoo, with Laurence R. Helfer, 93 CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW 899 (2005). A Brave New Judicial World in AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM AND HUMAN RIGHTS (Michael Ignatieff, ed., 2005). Winning Back the World’s Trust, GLOBAL AGENDA, 2005 edition. Help Develop Institutions and Instruments for Military Intervention on Humanitarian Grounds in RESTORING AMERICAN LEADERSHIP: 13 COOPERATIVE STEPS TO ADVANCE GLOBAL PROGRESS, Open Society Institute/Century Foundation, April 2005. To Pursue Primacy for its Own Sake Seems an Odd Way to Reassure Other Nations, BOSTON REVIEW, March 10, 2005. The New Challenges to International, National, and Human Security Policy: A Report to the Trilateral Commission (with Carl Bildt and Kazuo Ogura), THE TRILATERAL COMMISSION (2004). Response to Suzanne Nossel (Foreign Policy: How America Can Get its Groove Back: The First 100 Days of a New Administration, DISSENT (Fall 2004). Sovereignty and Power in a Networked World Order, 40 STANFORD JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 283 (2004). The International Dimension of the Law School Curriculum, 22 PENNSYLVANIA STATE INTERNATIONAL LAW REVIEW 417 (2004). The Partial Rule of Law, THE AMERICAN PROSPECT, (October, 2004). A Dangerous Myth, PROSPECT MAGAZINE, January 22, 2004. Disaggregated Sovereignty: Toward the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Is Transnational Litigation Different?
    IS TRANSNATIONAL LITIGATION DIFFERENT? SAMUEL P. BAUMGARTNER* ABSTRACT During the last fifteen years, there has been a growing interest in liti- gation transcending national borders. Yet, both in the United States and in Europe, where this interest is much older, a comprehensive intellectual framework to deal with this type of litigation is hard to find. In fact, courts and procedurallaw reformers still approach transnationalcases in the same fashion as purely domestic ones, adjusting the concepts of do- mestic law where they believe it necessary. This has created significant problems both for litigants seeking justice in transnational cases and for lawmakersfashioning policy specificallyfor the transnationalsetting. In light of recent developments in international trade law and in the European Union, this Article argues that, as a normative matter, we should begin to treat transnational litigation as a distinct field. It sug- gests that in-depth procedural comparison and international relations theory would have much to contribute to such afield. It uses a case study on judicial cooperation in Germany for litigation in the United States to demonstrate various ways in which lawmaking for transnationallitiga- tion is interconnected beyond national borders. The Article concludes that procedural law reformers who continue to disregard insights from both internationalpolitics and comparative procedure are apt to lose con- trol over their lawmaking efforts to savvy groups, to international trade regimes such as the IATO and NAFTA, and to lawmakers abroad. * Associate Professor, University of Akron School of Law. LL.B. 1990, University of Bern, Switzerland; M.L.I. 1993, LL.M. 1995, University of Wisconsin, Madison; J.S.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Abram Chayes (1922-2000) Jost Delbruck Indiana University Maurer School of Law
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Indiana University Bloomington Maurer School of Law Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 1999 In Memoriam: Abram Chayes (1922-2000) Jost Delbruck Indiana University Maurer School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Delbruck, Jost, "In Memoriam: Abram Chayes (1922-2000)" (1999). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 2821. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2821 This Response or Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In memoriam Abram Chayes (1922-2000) Felix Frankfurter, Professor of Law Emeritus, Harvard Law School In the late afternoon of Sunday, 16 April 2000, Abram Chayes died in a Boston Hospital at the age of 77. His death ends the life of a most distinguished inter- national legal scholar, brilliant and inspiring academic teacher as well as a dedicated public servant. He was a citoyen in the best sense of the word. But most importantly, Abe - the nickname that he let his family and his great number of personal friends use - was a wonderfully warmhearted and humane person, full of energy and a contagious enthusiasm and optimism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spiritual Sources of Legal Creativity the Inaugural Father Miguel D’Escoto Lecture Professor Richard A
    The Spiritual Sources of Legal Creativity The Inaugural Father Miguel D’Escoto Lecture Professor Richard A. Falk Fordham University School of Law October 24, 2017 Series Editor: Kevin M. Cahill, M.D. M. Cahill, M.D. Kevin Series Editor: 10 No. Occasional Paper Table of Contents Introduction: Kevin M. Cahill, M.D. 4 Lecture: Richard A. Falk Spiritual Sources of Legal Creativity 8 Responses: Martin S. Flaherty 18 Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser 23 Contributors and Acknowledgments 25 About the IIHA and CIHC 26 IIHA Book Series and Occasional Papers 27 Introduction Kevin M. Cahill, M.D. ways. The Ortegas and Tomas Borge and thousands of armed rebels fought the Nicaraguan National Guard in the hills while the ‘Group of This Inaugural Miguel D’Escoto Lecture celebrates an important an- Twelve’, as Miguel and his colleagues were known, worked with the niversary in international law, and the remarkable man who was the equally important weapons of pen and paper, often in our apartment moving force behind a landmark case affrming the rights of small in New York City, to create a new nation. nations in a world of proxy wars and illegal boycotts. When the Sandinista Government became a reality in 1979 Miguel, still For over 50 years, Miguel D’Escoto was more than a friend; our paths a Maryknoll priest, became the Foreign Minister. Maryknoll remained did not merely cross–they were intertwined. He was my patient when faithful to Miguel–and he to them–when, with the other priests in the he became ill as a Maryknoll missionary in Chile.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNE-MARIE SLAUGHTER New America • 740 15Th Street, NW, Suite 900 • Washington, DC 20005 PHONE 202-596-3372 • TWITTER @Slaughteram
    ANNE-MARIE SLAUGHTER New America • 740 15th Street, NW, Suite 900 • Washington, DC 20005 PHONE 202-596-3372 • TWITTER @slaughteram PRESENT POSITIONS President and CEO New America Bert G. Kerstetter '66 University Professor Emerita of Politics and International Affairs Princeton University Monthly Columnist Project Syndicate Foreign Policy Curator for over 80,000 followers worldwide through Twitter EDUCATION OXFORD UNIVERSITY D.Phil. in International Relations, 1992 Dissertation Topic: "Conceptions of the German Question in West German Domestic Politics, 1975-1985" HARVARD LAW SCHOOL J. D. cum laude, 1985 OXFORD UNIVERSITY M.Phil. in International Relations, 1982 PRINCETON UNIVERSITY A.B. magna cum laude, 1980 Majors: Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs European Cultural Studies Anne-Marie Slaughter Page 1 of 24 EMPLOYMENT 2003-2013 Bert G. Kerstetter ’66 University Professor of Politics and International Affairs Princeton University October 2012-October 2013 Contributing Editor The Atlantic Magazine 2009-2011 Director of Policy Planning United States Department of State 2002-2009 Dean of the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs Princeton University 2007-2008 Visiting Fellow Shanghai Institute for International Studies 2002-2004 President American Society of International Law 1994-2002 J. Sinclair Armstrong Professor of International, Foreign, and Comparative Law Harvard Law School 1997-2002 Director, Graduate and International Legal Studies Harvard Law School 1999-2002 Faculty Director, Harvard
    [Show full text]
  • Space Weapons: the Legal Context Author(S): Abram Chayes, Antonia Handler Chayes and Eliot Spitzer Source: Daedalus, Vol. 114, No
    Space Weapons: The Legal Context Author(s): Abram Chayes, Antonia Handler Chayes and Eliot Spitzer Source: Daedalus, Vol. 114, No. 3, Weapons in Space, Vol. II: Implications for Security (Summer, 1985), pp. 193-218 Published by: The MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024990 Accessed: 01-07-2015 19:26 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The MIT Press and American Academy of Arts & Sciences are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Daedalus. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.91.9.178 on Wed, 01 Jul 2015 19:26:34 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Abram Chayes, Antonia Handler Chayes, Eliot Spitzer SpaceWeapons: The Legal Context SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE SPACE AGE, political leaders and international lawyers have worked to establish a legal regime to govern activities in outer space. In the following three decades, a considerable, if by no means comprehensive, body of law has evolved. Elaborate conventions now regulate the placement of satellites in geostationary orbit, the allocation of frequencies for space communications, liability for space accidents, weather reporting networks, and many other specific activities in outer space.
    [Show full text]
  • In Memoriam: Abram Chayes (1922-2000)
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 1999 In Memoriam: Abram Chayes (1922-2000) Jost Delbruck Indiana University Maurer School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Delbruck, Jost, "In Memoriam: Abram Chayes (1922-2000)" (1999). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 2821. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2821 This Response or Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In memoriam Abram Chayes (1922-2000) Felix Frankfurter, Professor of Law Emeritus, Harvard Law School In the late afternoon of Sunday, 16 April 2000, Abram Chayes died in a Boston Hospital at the age of 77. His death ends the life of a most distinguished inter- national legal scholar, brilliant and inspiring academic teacher as well as a dedicated public servant. He was a citoyen in the best sense of the word. But most importantly, Abe - the nickname that he let his family and his great number of personal friends use - was a wonderfully warmhearted and humane person, full of energy and a contagious enthusiasm and optimism. All those who were fortunate to learn to know him feel a deep sense of loss and share in the grief with his family.
    [Show full text]
  • Communiquti Uno Fficial
    IN T OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, 2517 KJ The Hague. Tel. 92 44 41 Cables: Intercourt, The Hague Telex 32323 - Communiquti uno fficial r\i r^. ... for ~rnmediaterelsase / - \ 4 ," < v- 1. ,.y &.-f3,-; * ,- , ':J .* ." / P (- d , ;y/ II # '? fL 2 L No. 85/17 18 September 1985 Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) Progress of Public Hearings The following information is made available to the Press b~ tht Registry of the International Court of Justice: At the heariings which opened on 12 September 1985 on the merit> df the case concerning Military and Paramilitary Activities in a& against Nicaragua, between Nicaragua and the United States of Americ,~ Nicaragua began b:y calling witnesses. The witnesseç made their statements between 12 and 17 September after making the solemn declaration required by Article 64 of the Kuie- of Court. The Court heard in turn statements by Commander Luis i,arrTori Vice-Minister of the Interior of Nicaragua, on 12 and 13 September, Dr. David C. MacMichael, on 13 and 16 September, Mr. Michael 1. (:len11~)1> on 16 September, ,and Father Jean Loifon and Mr. William Hupper, Miriistei of Finance of Nicaragua, on 17 September. Questions were put t\ Commander CarrIon by President Nagendra Singh, Vice-President de Lachariiér, Judges Lachs, Schwebel, Sir Robert Jennings and Colliard. Questions wer~ put to Dr. David C. MacMichael by Judges Ni and Schwebel. Questions were put to the other witnesses by Judge Schwebel. On 18 September counsel for Nicaragua began their statements. Following an introduction by H.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Anne-Marie Slaughter Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks
    Anne-Marie Slaughter Disaggregated Sovereignty: Towards the Public Accountability of Global Government Networks Only governments bear the political imprimatur that is bestowed by politi- cal accountability. Neither multinational corporations nor international bureaucracies are a substitute. Addressing the most complex challenges posed by globalization requires the direct accountability carried by the rep- resentatives of sovereign nations. (Paul Martin, former Canadian Finance Minister and Chair of the G-201) TERRORISTS, ARMS DEALERS, MONEY LAUNDERERS, DRUG DEALERS, traffickers in women and children, and the modern pirates of intel- lectual property all operate through global networks.2 So, increas- ingly, do governments. Networks of government officials – police investigators, financial regulators, even judges and legislators – increasingly exchange information and coordinate activity to combat global crime and address common problems on a global scale. These government networks are a key feature of world order in the twenty- first century. But they are under-appreciated, under-supported and under-used to address the central problems of global governance. Consider the examples simply in the wake of 11 September. The Bush administration immediately set about assembling an ‘ad hoc coalition’ of states to aid in the war on terrorism. Public attention focused on military cooperation, but the networks of financial regu- lators working to identify and freeze terrorist assets, of law enforce- ment officials sharing vital information on terrorist suspects, and of intelligence operatives working to pre-empt the next attack have been equally important. Indeed, the leading expert in the ‘new 1 Paul Martin, ‘Notes for an Address by the Honourable Paul Martin to the Royal Institute of International Affairs’, London, 24 January 2001, on Department of Finance Canada homepage (accessed 22 June 2003); available from http:// www.fin.gc.ca/news01/01-009e.html.
    [Show full text]
  • The Legal Adviser's Duty to Explain
    FINAL PROOF TO AU JAN 7 (DO NOT DELETE) 2/1/16 12:39 PM Essay The Legal Adviser’s Duty to Explain Harold Hongju Koh† INTRODUCTION .........................................................................................................................................189 I. ORIGINS ........................................................................................................................................190 II. CONTROVERSIAL CASES ..............................................................................................................195 III. ANSWERING OBJECTIONS .............................................................................................................206 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................211 INTRODUCTION A great deal has been written about both international law and government lawyering. 1 Most of it has focused on a government legal adviser’s duties to give confidential advice to his or her principal, Secretary, Minister, or agency; his or her role in negotiation and litigation; and efforts among legal advisers to develop national and international networks to improve their effectiveness. Too little has been written about the crucial, overlooked responsibility of government international lawyers to explain publicly their government’s international law rationale for its actions: what I call “The Legal Adviser’s Duty to Explain.” As I suggested five years ago, the Legal Adviser’s Duty to
    [Show full text]
  • Nicaragua V. United States: the Op Wer of the International Court of Justice to Indicate Interim Measures in Political Disputes Noreen M
    Penn State International Law Review Volume 4 Article 5 Number 1 Dickinson Journal of International Law 1985 Nicaragua v. United States: The oP wer of the International Court of Justice to Indicate Interim Measures in Political Disputes Noreen M. Tama Follow this and additional works at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Tama, Noreen M. (1985) "Nicaragua v. United States: The oP wer of the International Court of Justice to Indicate Interim Measures in Political Disputes," Penn State International Law Review: Vol. 4: No. 1, Article 5. Available at: http://elibrary.law.psu.edu/psilr/vol4/iss1/5 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Penn State Law eLibrary. It has been accepted for inclusion in Penn State International Law Review by an authorized administrator of Penn State Law eLibrary. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Nicaragua v. United States: The Power of the International Court of Justice to Indicate Interim Measures in Political Disputes I. Background In 1979 the revolutionary Government of National Reconstruc- tion overthrew the freely elected administration of President General Anastasio Somoza Debayle to assume power as the new government of the Republic of Nicaragua. The "Sandinistas," as the new regime is known,' represent a coalition of the National Liberation Front and other leftist guerilla groups which together were responsible for oust- ing the former Somoza regime. This change in the control of the Nicaraguan government has
    [Show full text]
  • Preemptive Self-Defense in an Age of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Operation Iraqi Freedom
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 33 Number 1 Winter - 2004 Sutton Colloquium Article 12 April 2020 Preemptive Self-Defense in an Age of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Operation Iraqi Freedom Charles Pierson Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Charles Pierson, Preemptive Self-Defense in an Age of Weapons of Mass Destruction: Operation Iraqi Freedom, 33 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 150 (2004). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. PREEMPTIVE SELF-DEFENSE IN AN AGE OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION: OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM CHARLES PIERSON* Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot wait for the final proof,the smoking gun that could come in the form of a mushroom cloud. President George W. Bush' I. THE FIGHT OVER PREEMPTION With the promulgation of the Bush Doctrine, President George W. Bush announced a U.S. policy of preemptive action against terrorist states. 2 President Bush had previously identified Iraq, together with Iran and North Korea, as part of3 an "axis of evil" bent on the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The Bush Administration asserted that the danger of WMD in the hands of Saddam Hussein was so great that it justified a preemptive attack on Iraq before these weapons could be developed and used.4 ' J.D., Duquesne University School of Law, 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • International Law: Explaining International Acts Chimène I
    The Judges' Book Volume 3 Article 14 2019 International Law: Explaining International Acts Chimène I. Keitner Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/judgesbook Part of the International Law Commons, and the Judges Commons Recommended Citation Keitner, Chimène I. (2019) "International Law: Explaining International Acts," The Judges' Book: Vol. 3 , Article 14. Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/judgesbook/vol3/iss1/14 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in The udJ ges' Book by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2019] The Judges’ Book 87 International Law: Explaining International Acts1 Chimène I. Keitner In international law as in domestic law, the why of State action matters, not just the what of State action. The “culture of justification” that exists at the international level includes an expectation that States will articulate the legal and policy bases for their actions, particularly when such actions depart from accepted norms of State behavior.2 In a variety of contexts, States are expected—and seek—to explain their international acts. Although deliberative processes that lead to international acts may not be judicially reviewable to the same extent as those that lead to purely domestic acts, the push for transparency among domestic constituencies, as well as other oversight mechanisms, create ex ante incentives for integrity in decision-making processes and rationales in the conduct of foreign affairs. In addition, ex post explanations of international acts may themselves carry legal significance as expressions of a State’s opinio juris, or sense of legal obligation.
    [Show full text]