Download (756Kb)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download (756Kb) Munich Personal RePEc Archive Future of Rohingyas: Dignified Return to Myanmar or Restoring Their Rights or Both Mohajan, Haradhan Department of Mathematics, Premier University, Chittagong, Bangladesh 9 July 2020 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/108266/ MPRA Paper No. 108266, posted 12 Jun 2021 10:22 UTC The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 4, No. 2, January 2021, pp. 145-170 Future of Rohingyas: Dignified Return to Myanmar or Restoring Their Rights or Both Md Mahbubur Rahman PhD Student on Communication and Journalism, Massey University, New Zealand Email: [email protected] Haradhan Kumar Mohajan Assistant Professor, Department of Mathematics, Premier University, Chittagong, Bangladesh Email: [email protected] Mobile: +8801716397232 Tripty Kana Bose Assistant Director, Bangladesh Betar, Dhaka, Bangladesh Email: [email protected] Mobile: +8801717440686 Abstract At present Bangladesh is hosting more than 1.1 million of Rohingyas who have been migrated from Myanmar and maximum of them are living in 34 makeshift camps of Cox‟s Bazar and some thousands start to live at Bhashan Char of Bangladesh. The Government of Bangladesh (GoB) does not recognize Rohingyas as refugees and so they are not entitled to claim even the rights of refugees in Bangladesh. Getting support from the international community, the GoB still tries to repatriate Rohingyas to Myanmar, as the repatriation will relieve the huge burden of Bangladesh. But Rohingyas are not interested to go back to their home country, Myanmar without establishing their citizenship and some other rights. As a result, till today not a single Rohingya has been repatriated to Myanmar and so at present the future of the Rohingya is in uncertainty. Bangladesh always think the fruitful solution of the Rohingya Crisis lies on their repatriation but more than three years after Rohingyas‟ new entry in 2017 no repatriation happens and so the question arises what may be the future of Rohingyas? Is the future of Rohingyas rely on their repatriation or staying in Bangladesh for a longer period of time with or without restoring their rights, would be tried to discuss in this article. If the Rohingyas will have to stay in Bangladesh for a longer time, then what the GoB should do, will also be discussed in this paper. For this the field visit and interviews with Rohingya refugees at Rohingya Refugee Camp in 2018 and also in 2020 by the first author, M. M. Rahman, and his more than 3 years working experience on Rohingya crisis at BTV (Bangladesh Television) and the literature reviews by all the authors will be utilized. Keywords: Rohingya, citizenship rights, dignified return 1 The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 4, No. 2, January 2021, pp. 145-170 Introduction The Rohingya is the most ill-treated community of the world having lived in a realm of statelessness for generation to generation in Rakhine (former Arakan) State of the Republic of the Union of Myanmar (Milton et al., 2017). Rohingyas are the Muslims ethnic minority community living without citizenship rights at Myanmar and also in Bangladesh (Wekke et al. 2017). Rakhine is one of the poorest seven States of Myanmar with total area of 36,778 km2 (MSR, 2019) where most of the Rohingyas live (Chan, 2005; Mohajan, 2018). Myanmar is an independent country of Southeast Asia situated just adjacent Eastern side of Bangladesh (UNFPA, 2015; Karim & Islam, 2018). Since the August 2017 with the mass expulsion of more than 740,000 Rohingyas from Myanmar to Bangladesh, no sustainable solution for the Rohingyas is in sight till today. Immediately after the Rohingya exodus in 2017 high profile delegations from Bangladesh and Myanmar held several meetings with each other in both countries regarding Rohingya repatriation (Aziz, 2019). To send the Rohingyas back to Myanmar a repatriation agreement was signed on 23 November 2017 at Naypyidaw, Myanmar between Bangladesh and Myanmar (Holmes, 2017; Yhome, 2018). And as per the deal the Rohingya repatriation should begin within two months of signing the deal (Rahman, 2017). As per the repatriation agreement, the Government of Myanmar (GoM) has agreed to accept 1,500 Rohingyas each week. But till today no Rohingya has been repatriated to Myanmar (Kamruzzaman, 2020). If the agreement will be implemented, then it would also take more than 10 years to return more than 1.1 million Rohingyas from Bangladesh to their homeland because in the agreement it is mentioned that only 1,500 Rohingyas can be repatriated in a week. After signing of agreement, a series of painstaking discussions between the proactive Bangladesh and the unwilling Myanmar had been held and the two countries agreed to begin the attempt of repatriation on 15 November 2018. But the effort failed due to the unwillingness of Rohingyas to return back to Myanmar (RFA, 2018). Rohingyas demand that they would not return to an unsafe place and they have the fear that they may be persecuted again after return. At that time the International community also urged Bangladesh to halt the repatriation process as the conditions in Myanmar are not conducive (HRW, 2018a). Since the failed attempt in November 2018, the GoB put every effort to start repatriation again and finally saw a ray of hope for eventual repatriation of Rohingyas to Myanmar after China started to influence on GoM to permit the Rohingya Muslims to go to their home. As per the Rohingya list cleared by GoM, Bangladesh was all set to start repatriation on 22 August 2019, but that attempt of Rohingya repatriation also failed as no Rohingya show willingness to return to Myanmar. This time also the International Organizations urged Myanmar and Bangladesh to halt the repatriation process until Rohingya returns would be safe, voluntary, and dignified (HRW, 2019). International Crisis Group mentioned in its December 2017 report that the main obstacle to repatriation is that most Rohingyas are very unlikely to return. Still in 2021 after more than three years of 2017 Rohingya exodus the conditions in Rakhine state is not safe for the return of Rohingyas (Strangio, 2021) and the Rohingyas living in IDP camps or outside the Camps in Rakhine still are facing the discrimination (House of Commons, 2020; OCHA, 2021). Again, there is a lack of clarity from GoM on whether they would be allowed to return 2 The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Vol. 4, No. 2, January 2021, pp. 145-170 Rohingyas to their villages of origin and reclaim their farmland at Rakhine state. Because the entire Muslim Rohingya villages in Rakhine state have been demolished and replaced by police barracks, government buildings and refugee relocation camps (Head, 2019). The agreement piece between Bangladesh and Myanmar also provides for the issuance of National Verification Cards (NVCs) at the point of return; a document most Rohingyas reject out of fear that it will codify second-class citizenship status (Horsey, 2017). But the GoM and its security forces have expressed concern about the presence of any “terrorists” of Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) or their supporters among the Rohingya returnees which suggests returnees will be subjected to extreme scrutiny or vetting during the repatriation process (McKay, 2019). Another major obstacle or repatriation is that Rakhine Buddhist leaders and communities are strongly opposed to the return of any Rohingya (Mohajan, 2018). Getting no assurance of return with dignity to their motherland, more than a million Rohingyas staying in camps of Cox‟s Bazar, Bangladesh are now facing an uncertain future. As the Myanmar authorities still have not addressed the fundamental rights of Rohingyas being denied citizenship, freedom of movement, security, and other basic rights and so there is slim prospects of return of Rohingyas. Again, many of Rohingyas living in the Cox‟s Bazar camps are not still interested to go back to Myanmar because of fear of abusing again if they return. So, though the life-saving essentials, such as food, water, sanitation, shelter and basic health services are now more or less in place in the camps of Cox‟s Bazar but attention must now need to turn to Rohingyas‟ future prospects (Rahman & Mohajan, 2019). In this study the future of Rohingyas living in Bangladesh will be discussed. As Bangladesh is not a party of the 1951 Convention relating to the status of Refugees nor its 1967 Protocol and so the country does not have any obligation to recognize Rohingyas as refugees (UNHCR 2007a; Zetter & Ruaudel 2016) and so the country recognize them as FDMN (forcibly displaced Myanmar Nationals). The present status of Rohingya people in Bangladesh will also be discussed in this article. We will also try to bring light on the future of Rohingyas living in Bangladesh considering whether they could return to Myanmar soon or the GoB should ease the restrictions on longer-term assistance like freedom of movement, education and job facilities to the Rohingyas so that they could be self-dependent. Literature Review Many researchers argue that the plight of Rohingyas has the root cause of their statelessness identity. Despite their presence in Myanmar dating back to the 8th century, the GoM continues to deny the citizenship of the Rohingyas and their most basic human rights since 1962 or more specifically from 1982 (Rosenthal, 2019). The 1982 Citizenship Law of Myanmar has conferred 135 ethnic groups of which the Rohingyas were not included and as a result Myanmar has created the world‟s largest stateless population within its territory (Zawacki, 2009). Chris Lewa has argued that deprivation of citizenship has served as a key strategy to justify arbitrary treatment and discriminatory policies against the Rohingyas (Lewa, 2009). Citizenship and identity are closely intertwined as providing legal basis for the claiming and recognition of basic rights of a person.
Recommended publications
  • BARGUNA District: AMTALI Upazila/Thana: Slno Eiin Name Of
    Upazila/Thana Wise list of Institutes District: BARGUNA Upazila/Thana: AMTALI Slno Eiin Name of the Institution Vil/Road Mobile 1 134886 SOUTH BENGAL IDEAL SCHOOL AND COLLEGE AMTALI 01734041282 2 100022 MAFIZ UDDIN GIRLS PILOT HIGH SCHOOL UPZILA ROAD 01718101316 3 138056 PURBO CHAWRA GOVT. PRIMARY SCHOOL PATAKATA 01714828397 4 100051 UTTAR TIAKHALI JUNIOR GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL UTTAR TIAKHALI 01736712503 5 100016 CHARAKGACHIA SECONDARY SCHOOL CHARAKGACHIA 01734083480 6 100046 KHAGDON JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL KHAGDON 01725966348 7 100028 SHAHEED SOHRAWARDI SECONDARY SCHOOL KUKUA 01719765468 8 100044 GHATKHALI HIGH SCHOOL GHATKHALI 01748265596 9 100038 KALAGACHIA YUNUS A K JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL KALAGACHIA 01757959215 10 100042 K H AKOTA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL KALAGACHHIA 01735437438 11 100039 HALIMA KHATUN G R GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL GULISHAMALI 01721789762 12 100034 KHEKUANI HIGH SCHOOL KHEKUANI 01737227025 13 100023 GOZ-KHALI(MLT) HIGH SCHOOL GOZKHALI 01720485877 14 100037 ATHARAGACHIA SECONDARY SCHOOL ATHARAGACHIA 01712343508 15 100017 EAST CHILA RAHMANIA HIGH SCHOOL PURBA CHILA 01716203073,011 90276935 16 100009 LOCHA JUUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LOCHA 01553487462 17 100048 MODDHO CHANDRA JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL MODDHO CHANDRA 01748247502 18 100020 CHALAVANGA HIGH SCHOOL PRO CHALAVANGA 01726175459 19 100011 AMTALI A.K. PILOT HIGH SCHOOL 437, A K SCHOOL ROAD, AMTALI 01716296310 20 100026 ARPAN GASHIA HIGH SCHOOL ARPAN GASHIA 01724183205 21 100018 TARIKATA SECONDARY SCHOOL TARIKATA 01714588243 22 100014 SHAKHRIA HIGH SCHOOL SHAKHARIA 01712040882 23 100021 CHUNAKHALI HIGH
    [Show full text]
  • Farmers' Organizations in Bangladesh: a Mapping and Capacity
    Farmers’ Organizations in Bangladesh: Investment Centre Division A Mapping and Capacity Assessment Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Viale delle Terme di Caracalla – 00153 Rome, Italy. Bangladesh Integrated Agricultural Productivity Project Technical Assistance Component FAO Representation in Bangladesh House # 37, Road # 8, Dhanmondi Residential Area Dhaka- 1205. iappta.fao.org I3593E/1/01.14 Farmers’ Organizations in Bangladesh: A Mapping and Capacity Assessment Bangladesh Integrated Agricultural Productivity Project Technical Assistance Component Food and agriculture organization oF the united nations rome 2014 Photo credits: cover: © CIMMYt / s. Mojumder. inside: pg. 1: © FAO/Munir uz zaman; pg. 4: © FAO / i. nabi Khan; pg. 6: © FAO / F. Williamson-noble; pg. 8: © FAO / i. nabi Khan; pg. 18: © FAO / i. alam; pg. 38: © FAO / g. napolitano; pg. 41: © FAO / i. nabi Khan; pg. 44: © FAO / g. napolitano; pg. 47: © J.F. lagman; pg. 50: © WorldFish; pg. 52: © FAO / i. nabi Khan. Map credit: the map on pg. xiii has been reproduced with courtesy of the university of texas libraries, the university of texas at austin. the designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and agriculture organization of the united nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. the mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • From Cox's Bazar to Bhasan Char: an Assessment of Bangladesh's
    MAY 2020 ISSUE NO. 357 From Cox’s Bazar to Bhasan Char: An Assessment of Bangladesh’s Relocation Plan for Displaced Rohingyas SREEPARNA BANERJEE ABSTRACT The Rohingyas are among the world’s most persecuted communities, who, until a mass exodus in 2017, mainly resided in Myanmar’s Rakhine State. In 2017, about 712,179 Rohingyas made their way to Bangladesh, taking the total number of Rohingya refugees in that country to 855,000.1 The overcrowding caused by this influx at the Cox’s Bazar refugee camps has led the Bangladesh government to consider temporarily relocating the Rohingya refugees to the silt island of Bhasan Char under its Ashrayan-3 policy. This brief analyses the merits of Bangladesh’s plan to relocate the displaced Rohingya people to Bhasan Char. Attribution: Sreeparna Banerjee, “From Cox’s Bazar to Bhasan Char: An Assessment of Bangladesh’s Relocation Plan for Displaced Rohingyas,” ORF Issue Brief No. 357, May 2020, Observer Research Foundation. Observer Research Foundation (ORF) is a public policy think tank that aims to influence the formulation of policies for building a strong and prosperous India. ORF pursues these goals by providing informed analyses and in-depth research, and organising events that serve as platforms for stimulating and productive discussions. ISBN 978-93-89622-99-7 © 2020 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, copied, archived, retained or transmitted through print, speech or electronic media without prior written approval from ORF. From Cox's Bazar to Bhasan Char: An Assessment of Bangladesh’s Relocation Plan for Displaced Rohingyas INTRODUCTION is exacerbated by the nearly 855,000 displaced Rohingya people who have sought refuge in Bangladesh is the eighth most populated the country after fleeing persecution in nd country in the world but ranks 92 in terms of neighbouring Myanmar.3 land area.
    [Show full text]
  • International Conference on the Rohingya Crisis in Comparative Perspective
    LONDON’S GLOBAL UNIVERSITY ISBN 978-1-5272-4300-2 International Conference on the Rohingya Crisis in Comparative Perspective Book of Abstracts Editor: Dr Bayes Ahmed Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction (IRDR), and Centre for Collective Violence, Holocaust and Genocide Studies University College London (UCL) London, United Kingdom (UK) 4 - 5 July 2019 International Conference on the Rohingya Crisis in Comparative Perspective International Conference on the Rohingya Crisis in Comparative Perspective Book of Abstracts Editor and Organiser: Dr Bayes Ahmed Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction (IRDR), and Centre for Collective Violence, Holocaust and Genocide Studies University College London (UCL) Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK July 2019 i International Conference on the Rohingya Crisis in Comparative Perspective International Conference on the Rohingya Crisis in Comparative Perspective: Book of Abstracts Editor: Dr Bayes Ahmed Published by: UCL Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction (IRDR), University College London (UCL), UK Copyright: © 2019 UCL Institute for Risk and Disaster Reduction (IRDR), University College London (UCL), United Kingdom (UK). © Photographs by Bayes Ahmed. All photographs used in this book of abstracts were captured by Dr Bayes Ahmed during his fieldwork in the Rohingya camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. ISBN: 978-1-5272-4300-2 Printed by: SLS Print, 73 Central Street, London, EC1V 8BU, UK The views expressed in the abstracts/ papers are authors’ personal opinions and do not reflect those of UCL or the University of Dhaka (DU).
    [Show full text]
  • Developments
    Highlights: Camp Conditions: • After receiving reports of poor living conditions on Bhasan Char island, Human Rights Watch has urged Bangladesh to move all the Rohingya there back to the refugee camps in Cox’s Bazar. But Bangladesh officials have said that the Rohingya will stay at Bhasan Char until repatriated to Myanmar. • Bangladesh officials have declared that the COVID-19 outbreak in the refugee camps is “successfully contained.” Accountability: • The UK has imposed sanctions on the Myanmar military’s commander-in-chief and his deputy for alleged human rights abuses against the Rohingya people. • The Organization of Islamic Cooperation called on Myanmar’s government to comply with the resolutions of the International Court of Justice and the UN Human Rights Council and stop violations against the Rohingya. High-level statements: • The United States has released a statement commending Indonesia’s recent response to the arrival of Rohingya refugees. • India’s external affairs minister has noted the need for a speedy repatriation of Rohingya to Myanmar, and emphasized India’s commitment to stand beside Bangladesh. • Human rights groups have urged the Myanmar government to restore Rohingyas’ citizenship and voting rights ahead of November’s election. Developments: Rohingya man killed in Cox’s Bazar ‘gunfight’ The Daily Star (July 12) A Rohingya man, allegedly involved in yaba smuggling, was killed in a reported gunfight with paramilitary force Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) in Cox's Bazar early on July 12. Two BGB members were also injured in the incident. Malaysia's changing policy on Rohingya refugees Bangkok Post (July 11) Malaysia's criticism of Myanmar over the Rohingya issue has been vocal, especially in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Madrasha
    List of Madrasha Division BARISAL District BARGUNA Thana AMTALI Sl Eiin Name Village/Road Mobile 1 100065 WEST CHILA AMINIA FAZIL MADRASAH WEST CHILA 01716835134 2 100067 MOHAMMADPUR MAHMUDIA DAKHIL MADRASAH MOHAMMADPUR 01710322701 3 100069 AMTALI BONDER HOSAINIA FAZIL MADRASHA AMTALI 01714599363 4 100070 GAZIPUR SENIOR FAZIL (B.A) MADRASHA GAZIPUR 01724940868 5 100071 KUTUBPUR FAZIL MADRASHA KRISHNA NAGAR 01715940924 6 100072 UTTAR KALAMPUR HATEMMIA DAKHIL MADRASA KAMALPUR 01719661315 7 100073 ISLAMPUR HASHANIA DAKHIL MADRASHA ISLAMPUR 01745566345 8 100074 MOHISHKATA NESARIA DAKHIL MADRASA MOHISHKATA 01721375780 9 100075 MADHYA TARIKATA DAKHIL MADRASA MADHYA TARIKATA 01726195017 10 100076 DAKKHIN TAKTA BUNIA RAHMIA DAKHIL MADRASA DAKKHIN TAKTA BUNIA 01718792932 11 100077 GULISHAKHALI DAKHIL MDRASHA GULISHAKHALI 01706231342 12 100078 BALIATALI CHARAKGACHHIA DAKHIL MADRASHA BALIATALI 01711079989 13 100080 UTTAR KATHALIA DAKHIL MADRASAH KATHALIA 01745425702 14 100082 PURBA KEWABUNIA AKBARIA DAKHIL MADRASAH PURBA KEWABUNIA 01736912435 15 100084 TEPURA AHMADIA DAKHIL MADRASA TEPURA 01721431769 16 100085 AMRAGACHIA SHALEHIA DAKHIL AMDRASAH AMRAGACHIA 01724060685 17 100086 RAHMATPUR DAKHIL MADRASAH RAHAMTPUR 01791635674 18 100088 PURBA PATAKATA MEHER ALI SENIOR MADRASHA PATAKATA 01718830888 19 100090 GHOP KHALI AL-AMIN DAKHIL MADRASAH GHOPKHALI 01734040555 20 100091 UTTAR TEPURA ALAHAI DAKHIL MADRASA UTTAR TEPURA 01710020035 21 100094 GHATKHALI AMINUDDIN GIRLS ALIM MADRASHA GHATKHALI 01712982459 22 100095 HARIDRABARIA D.S. DAKHIL MADRASHA HARIDRABARIA
    [Show full text]
  • List of Madrsha
    List of Madrasha Division BARISAL District BARGUNA Thana AMTALI Sl Eiin Name Village/Road Mobile 1 100065 WEST CHILA AMINIA FAZIL MADRASAH WEST CHILA 01716835134 2 100067 MOHAMMADPUR MAHMUDIA DAKHIL MADRASAH MOHAMMADPUR 01710322701 3 100069 AMTALI BONDER HOSAINIA FAZIL MADRASHA AMTALI 01714599363 4 100070 GAZIPUR SENIOR FAZIL (B.A) MADRASHA GAZIPUR 01724940868 5 100071 KUTUBPUR FAZIL MADRASHA KRISHNA NAGAR 01715940924 6 100072 UTTAR KALAMPUR HATEMMIA DAKHIL MADRASA KAMALPUR 01719661315 7 100073 ISLAMPUR HASHANIA DAKHIL MADRASHA ISLAMPUR 01745566345 8 100074 MOHISHKATA NESARIA DAKHIL MADRASA MOHISHKATA 01721375780 9 100075 MADHYA TARIKATA DAKHIL MADRASA MADHYA TARIKATA 01726195017 10 100076 DAKKHIN TAKTA BUNIA RAHMIA DAKHIL MADRASA DAKKHIN TAKTA BUNIA 01718792932 11 100077 GULISHAKHALI DAKHIL MDRASHA GULISHAKHALI 01706231342 12 100078 BALIATALI CHARAKGACHHIA DAKHIL MADRASHA BALIATALI 01711079989 13 100080 UTTAR KATHALIA DAKHIL MADRASAH KATHALIA 01745425702 14 100082 PURBA KEWABUNIA AKBARIA DAKHIL MADRASAH PURBA KEWABUNIA 01736912435 15 100084 TEPURA AHMADIA DAKHIL MADRASA TEPURA 01721431769 16 100085 AMRAGACHIA SHALEHIA DAKHIL AMDRASAH AMRAGACHIA 01724060685 17 100086 RAHMATPUR DAKHIL MADRASAH RAHAMTPUR 01791635674 18 100088 PURBA PATAKATA MEHER ALI SENIOR MADRASHA PATAKATA 01718830888 19 100090 GHOP KHALI AL-AMIN DAKHIL MADRASAH GHOPKHALI 01734040555 20 100091 UTTAR TEPURA ALAHAI DAKHIL MADRASA UTTAR TEPURA 01710020035 21 100094 GHATKHALI AMINUDDIN GIRLS ALIM MADRASHA GHATKHALI 01712982459 22 100095 HARIDRABARIA D.S. DAKHIL MADRASHA HARIDRABARIA
    [Show full text]
  • Relocating the Rohingyas in Bhashan Char: Advantages and Disadvantages
    Relocating the Rohingyas in Bhashan Char: Advantages and Disadvantages Labiba Faiaz Bari Following the launch of a military campaign in Myanmar, heavily include rape, murder, torture and arson, almost 743,000 Rohingya Muslims left for Bangladesh from Rakhine state in 2017. This large number of refugees joined 300,000 others who arrived here earlier, making the total number stand at one million. This massive exodus of refugee at Cox's Bazar left the refugee camps overcrowded, which led the Bangladesh government to consider a temporary plan for the relocation of refugee under its Ashrayan-3 policy. The government has declared that it intended to move the displaced refugee to Bhashan Char, also known as Thengar Char, a low-lying island located in Hatiya Upazila of Noakhali District. Initially, 100,000 refugees will be located under this project and the cost of the project stands at Tk 3094.95 crore Bhashan Char: A new home for Rohingya Refugee What is Char? Char means a tract of lands surrounded by water which is formed by the sediments carried in murky water of the river system. In Bangladesh, the formation of new char island creates new opportunities for the vulnerable communities to establish new settlements and pursue new agricultural and farming activities. All the chars are the properties of the Bangladesh government, which has assigned the forest department to look after the tree plantation programs to make the emerging chars habitable and stable. 1 | P a g e In reference to the definition of Char, "Bhashan Char" means floating island. This particular island is a spit of land formed by accumulated slit.
    [Show full text]
  • List of School
    List of School Division BARISAL District BARGUNA Thana AMTALI Sl Eiin Name Village/Road Mobile 1 100003 DAKSHIN KATHALIA TAZEM ALI SECONDARY SCHOOL KATHALIA 01720343613 2 100009 LOCHA JUUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL LOCHA 01553487462 3 100011 AMTALI A.K. PILOT HIGH SCHOOL 437, A K SCHOOL ROAD, 01716296310 AMTALI 4 100012 CHOTONILGONG HIGH SCHOOL CHOTONILGONG 01718925197 5 100014 SHAKHRIA HIGH SCHOOL SHAKHARIA 01712040882 6 100015 GULSHA KHALIISHAQUE HIGH SCHOOL GULISHAKHALI 01716080742 7 100016 CHARAKGACHIA SECONDARY SCHOOL CHARAKGACHIA 01734083480 8 100017 EAST CHILA RAHMANIA HIGH SCHOOL PURBA CHILA 01716203073,0119027693 5 9 100018 TARIKATA SECONDARY SCHOOL TARIKATA 01714588243 10 100019 CHILA HASHEM BISWAS HIGH SCHOOL CHILA 01715952046 11 100020 CHALAVANGA HIGH SCHOOL PRO CHALAVANGA 01726175459 12 100021 CHUNAKHALI HIGH SCHOOL CHUNAKHALI 01716030833 13 100022 MAFIZ UDDIN GIRLS PILOT HIGH SCHOOL UPZILA ROAD 01718101316 14 100023 GOZ-KHALI(MLT) HIGH SCHOOL GOZKHALI 01720485877 15 100024 KAUNIA IBRAHIM ACADEMY KAUNIA 01721810903 16 100026 ARPAN GASHIA HIGH SCHOOL ARPAN GASHIA 01724183205 17 100028 SHAHEED SOHRAWARDI SECONDARY SCHOOL KUKUA 01719765468 18 100029 KALIBARI JR GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL KALIBARI 0172784950 19 100030 HALDIA GRUDAL BANGO BANDU HIGH SCHOOL HALDIA 01715886917 20 100031 KUKUA ADARSHA HIGH SCHOOL KUKUA 01713647486 21 100032 GAZIPUR BANDAIR HIGH SCHOOL GAZIPUR BANDAIR 01712659808 22 100033 SOUTH RAOGHA NUR AL AMIN Secondary SCHOOL SOUTH RAOGHA 01719938577 23 100034 KHEKUANI HIGH SCHOOL KHEKUANI 01737227025 24 100035 KEWABUNIA SECONDARY
    [Show full text]
  • List of Project in ADP 2020-21
    List of Project in ADP 2020-21 Project Description Allocation (in Lakh) Parliament Affairs Secretariate Ministry's Own 0201-5000 Strengthening Parliament Capacity into Population ‡÷ªs‡`wbs cvj©v‡g›Um K¨vcvwmwU BbUz ccy‡jkb GÛ 83.00 and Development Issues. †W‡fjc‡g›Um Bm¨yR 22/10/20 Page 1 of 117 1 List of Project in ADP 2020-21 Project Description Allocation (in Lakh) Prime Minister's Office Prime Minister's Office 0301-1111 Capacity building of Public Administration for ‡UKmB Dbœqb Afxó AR©‡b RbcÖkvm‡bi `ÿZv e„w×KiY 8,757.00 achieving Sustainable Development 0301-1112 Enterpreneurship and Skill development project D‡`¨v³v m„wó I `ÿZv Dbœqb 929.00 0301-5822 Development Assistance for Development of Special we‡kl GjvKvi Rb¨ Dbœqb mnvqZv (cve©Z¨ PÆMÖvg e¨ZxZ) 8,000.00 Areas (Except Chittagong Hill Tracts) Autonomous Bodies & Other Institutions 0305-5011 Support to Capacity Building of Bangladesh mv‡cvU© Uz K¨vcvwmwU wewìs Ae evsjv‡`k BKbwgK †Rvbm 1,832.00 Economic Zones Authority. A_wiwU| 0305-5012 Bangladesh Economic Zones Development Project evsjv‡`k BK‡bvwgK †Rvbm †W‡fjc‡g›U cÖ‡R± (†dR-1)| 20,000.00 (Phase-I). National Security Intelligence 0321-5010 Construction of 10 storied (Revised 20 Storied) RvZxq wbivcËv †Mv‡q›`v Kvh©vj‡qi 20 Zjv wfZ wewkó 2wU 11,000.00 Head Office Building for NSI with 20 (twenty) Storied †eR‡g›Umn 10 Zjv (ms‡kvwaZ 20 Zjv) cÖavb Kvh©vjq wbg©vY Foundation and 2 Basement (1st Revistion) (1g ms‡kvwaZ) Export Processing Zone Authority (BEPZA) 0325-0007 Construction of 4 nos.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection in Danger Monthly News Brief
    Protection in Danger Monthly News Brief July Safety, security and access incidents 2020 Incidents of threats and violence in refugee and IDP settings Africa This monthly digest Democratic Republic of the Congo comprises threats 06 July 2020: In Litsho village, near Drodro, Djugu territory, Ituri and incidents of province, two IDPs working in the fields near to Drodro camp were shot violence affecting dead and another seriously injured and hospitalised by Coalition of protection of IDPs Congolese Democrats (CODECO) militiamen. Other IDPs fled into the and refugees. forest. Source: Bunia Actualite It is prepared by 08 July 2020: In Reta village, near Drodro, Djugu territory, Ituri province, Insecurity Insight from an IDP was shot dead by CODECO militiamen during an attack on the information available in village. Other IDPs managed to escape. Source: Bunia Actualite open sources. 09 July 2020: In Boba village, near Bule, Djugu territory, Ituri province, The incidents reported at least two IDPs working in the fields were killed in another attack by are not a complete nor a CODECO militiamen, who subsequently looted 130 cows from the local representative list of all population. Sources: Bunia Actualite, La Prunelle and MNCTV events of threats and incidents of violence Congo affecting protection of IDPs and refugees and Mozambique have not been 14 July 2020: In Pemba city, Cabo Delgado province, 15 IDPs arriving independently verified. by dhow (sailing ship) were arrested by Mozambican marines and held in police custody until they confessed to being members of the Visit our website to insurgency. They were freed the next day after reports reached the press download previous that they had been tortured into their confessions, including being bitten Protection in Danger by dogs.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Affairs Part - Iv
    CURRENT AFFAIRS PART - IV CONTENTS INDIA AND NEIGHBOURS Scrapping of Article 370 and LAC tensions ................................................................................... 6 Why banning trade with China will hurt India more? ................................................................... 6 TEESTA RIVER PROJECT ............................................................................................................ 8 Kholongchhu Hydro Electric Project ............................................................................................. 8 India & Bangladesh ...................................................................................................................... 9 Spratly and Paracel Islands Disputes ........................................................................................... 9 Constitution of Nepal (Second Amendment) Bill 2077................................................................. 10 Shwe Project In Myanmar .......................................................................................................... 10 China Passes Hong Kong Security Law ....................................................................................... 11 Pakistan-Afghanistan Transit Trade Agreement (APTTA) ............................................................ 11 Kohala Hydropower Project ........................................................................................................ 11 Bhutan Issues Demarches to China ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]