“Eva Hesse: Alone And/Or Only With”, Artspace, September-October 1992

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Eva Hesse: Alone And/Or Only With”, Artspace, September-October 1992 ARTSPACE A MAGAZINE OF CONTEMPORARY ART Editor/Publisher William Peterson VOLUME 1 6 NUMBER Associate Editor Peter Clothier 5 Associate Publisher/Circulation Jan Schmitz SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 1 992 Associate Publisher/Advertising Richard Heller Art Director Alyce Woodward Office Manager Ruanna Waldrum Contributing Editors Kenneth Baker, Frederick R. Weisman Museum of Art at Pepperdine University 30 Gus Blaisdell, Peter Frank, Dave Hickey, Joe Lewis, Ben Marks, Maria Porges, V.B. Price, Kathleen Shields. Guggenheim Grandeur: Gala Reopening and Expansion by Kenneth Baker 32 Correspondents (California): Lita Barrie, Aaron i3etsky, Jamie Brunson, Mario Cutajar, Susan Ehrlich, Cohn An Interview with James Corcoran by Richard Heller 35 Gardner, Joan Hugo, Mark Levy, John Muse, John O’Brien, Ralph Rugoff, Peter Selz, Rebecca Eva Hesse: “Alone And/Or Only With” by W.S. Wilson 36 Solnit, Benjamin Weissman, Kathy Zimmerer; (New Mexico): Edward Bryant, Eugenia P. Jams, Neery Norman Bluhm: Love’s Labors Won by Robert Creeley 42 Melkonian; (New York): Dan Cameron, W.S. Wilson, John Yau; (Nevada): Ingrid Evans, Peter Goin; (Texas): Karen Carson: Full Circle by Ben Marks 44 Frances Colpitt, Charles Dee Mitchell, Elizabeth Thomas McBride; (Washington): Jennifer McLerran, Max Gimblett: Iconic Abstraction by Lita Barrie 46 Patin. Agnostic Abstraction: David Ansico, Roger Hernsan,John Ivlillei Mailing Address: ARTSPACE, P.O. Box 36C69 by James Scarborough 49 Los Angeles, CA 90036-1269 Robert Tiemann: Beyond Originality by Frances Colpitt 52 Business and Editorial Office: ARTSPACE, 5657 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 340 Guy Dill: Sculpture Is About Proof by Jan Butterfield 55 Los Angeles, CA 90036 213/931-1433 Ursula von Rydingsvard by Peter Clothier 58 U.S.A. newsstand distribution: Reliquaries Among Friends by 60 Eastern News Distributors, Inc. Bill Berkson 1130 Cleveland Road, Sandusky, OH 44870 Chicago: by Kenneth Baker 1-800-221-3148 On the Scene 62 San Francisco: On the Scene by Maria Porges 64 Subscriptions: $29.95 per year. Canada & Mexico: $45. All other foreign: $65. Los Angeles: On the Scene by Lita Barrie 66 To order a subscription write: ARTSPACE - Dept. ARS Santa Fe: On the Scene by Arden Reed 68 P.O. Box 3000 Denville, NJ 07834-9818 BACK ISSUES: To order individual copies call or write: BOOKSTOP, 3412 Central SE, Albuquerque, NM 87106, tel. 505/268-8898. Libraries or Institu tions: Lawrence McGilvery, P.O. Box 852, La Jolla, CA 92038, tel. 619/454-4443 ARTSPACE is published bimonthly by Artspace COVER: Karen Carson, Los Au5cles, 12” in diameter, eel vinyl on found International, Inc., 5657 Wilshire Blvd. Suite # 340, globe, 1992. Photograph: Douglas M. Parker Swdio; courtesy Rosamund Angeles, California 90036. Contents copyright © Los Felsen Gallery, Los Angeles. 1992. ISSN: 0193-6596. ARTSPACE is not responsi ble for loss or damage to submissions, and publication of submitted materials is not guaranteed. Unsolicited sub missions cannot be returned without an SASE. The views expressed in the articles are those of the individ ual writers and do not necessarily represent those of the ARTSPACE management and staff. Eva Ri5ht.4firr, Hesce, 60” 216” x x 48” casting resin over fiberglass cord and svire hooks, 1969. Milwaukee Art Museum. Photo courtesy Robert Miller Gallery, New York. EVA HESSE “ALONE “ AND/OR ONLY WITH” # W.S. Wilson S9 is Manhattan Ice Floe... Methods of thought can generate objects of thought—phantom is metaphor a I use to think with about the structure of events, objects like an angel, or Pegasus, or universal generalizations—so meth and structures in works of art, and about systems and rules. Few people ods of thought have to be looked at. The facts in a science are con seem to have come to Manhattan to learn the rules and/or to obey structed by the experimental, observational, or methodological proce them: bikes the on sidewalk, air—horns blasting at dawn, parents jay— dures of that science. Phlogiston and the ether are among the sometime walking with babies in strollers. Walking home from Soho, picking hypothetical constructs which haven’t held up so well. Some mathe and choosing my own set of rules for pedestrian traffic, and improvising maticians think that mathematics discovers mathematical facts which my decorum from block to block, I passed a couple standing at the exist eternally, and others that mathematics constructs mathematical corner of 11th Street and 4th Street. He said that they couldn’t be at objects as the product of its methods of probing mathematical objects. 4th Street, they had just been at 12th Street, and she said, “We’re not Parallel questions are found in the visual arts. at 4th, we’re at 11th,” and he gave her a look. So much for the legiti-. For some artists, a world of objective external facts precedes inves mation of systems and of rules. Eva 1-lesse wrote in her notebook, tigation of the facts, and such facts can be imitated or represented, with October 28th, 1960: “I will paint against every rule I or others have verisimilitude or expressionist interpretation, in realistic pictures. But invisibly placed. Oh, how they penetrate throughout and all over...” construction, or constructivism, such as you are reading about in this Perhaps people break laws as an experimental method of thinking sentence which is building itself here, pertains to objects which are about laws, and rules, the and legitimation of systems. Experimental constructed by the methods which investigate those objects. In this methods, after all, purge deceptive illusions, and violating rules gives sense, constructs, or constructivisi objects—”.. did not exist for our State one good a look at the edges—where rules can be broken down, or ments to be true or false of before we carried out the investigations where they might break down, or just stop. At the edge of a system of which brought them into being” (Michael Dummett, “Wittgenstein’s rules one may be on one’s own, but needing to do perhaps what one Philosophy of Mathematict” in Wittgenstein: The Philosophical needs to do—to invent one’s own rules, or to decide which rules to Investigations, ed. George Pitcher [“)ew York: 19661, 447). Eighteen— preserve and to try to extend those into the future. I think that every year-old Eva Hesse was quoted in Seventeen magazine, September, moment is anarchic, or would be, except that we pull the rules and 1954: “For me being an artist means to see, to observe, to investi laws along with us. Often lately I try to wait for the light to change gate...” Her verb, “to investigate,” suggests that she is questioning before crossing. conventional “facts,” and that she might already think that some enti 36 - ,.. Eva Hesse, Repetition Ni,ieteeit III, 19 anus, each 19”— 20’,” high. 11”— 12” diameter, fiberglass and polyester resin, July 1968. Museum of Modern Art, New York. Courtesy Robert Miller Gallery. ties would not exist apart from the investigations which bring them lished. As edited so far, this chronology notes for 1966: “June 4—5: into existence on a visual plane among other observables. weekend at Fire Island with artists Paul Thek and Mike Todd.” I Scientific investigations have taken some concepts from ordinary wrote an essay on the late Paul Thek for Art and Artists (“Paul Thek: common-sensical discourse, and have returned them with their edges Love-Death,” April, 1968) in which I suggest that the meaning of his sharpened—words like indeterminacy, undecidability, foundationlessness, work is that it is intellectually uninterpretable—that it is about the exis incompleteness, catastrophe, chaos, and uncertainty. Uncertainties anse even tence of the kind of uninterpretable bodily feelings that it elicits. in an ordinary measurement because standards and rules of measure A weekend with Paul Thek and Mike Todd must have been a ment are not empincally observable. The measurement is a construc working weekend, if only because Eva Hesse was always working on tion made by following the rules of a system. Then, once a measure her thinking with materials, trying to formulate the questions not of life ment has been made, it introduces uncertainties about its accuracy, and in general, but of her life, as visual questions. She was trying to answer for some purposes, must be repeated, as one gradually constructs a those visual questions with visual answers which she could believe, and more precise uncertainty which hasn’t existed before. Other uncertainties thus teach herself to hold her own beliefs (borrowing a phrase from and indeterminacies emerge in experiments which, as they study light, Michael Polanyi, Personal Knowledge). construct light into waves or into corpuscles: waves and/or corpuscles. Mike Todd was and is a sculptor, now in Los Angeles, who some “And/or” is like a logical hinge which allows one to make a turn with times used pieces of blue denim jeans heavily stitched at the seams- in an idea: one, or the other. Eva Hesse writes in her journal, March and feathers. Those three artists at that weekend on the beach were 30th, 1961: “Want to be alone and/or only with one person I can three individuals with problems about bnnging the surface of materials love.” Two weeks later she writes—emphasis mine—”l have been to the surface in a work of art. They shared questions about the u’itli Tom Doyle the last 3 days.” expressiveness of the condition of the materials they were using- My theme here, “alone and/or only with,” is inspired by the whether to transform the material completely, as Paul Thek used great show honoring Eva Hesse as an alumna at the Yale University Art encaustic to imitate raw flesh; whether, like Mike Todd, to paint Gallery. Scheduled for the Hirshhorn Museum and Sculpture Garden objects such as old shoes, or whether to leave the matenals raw, on the in Washington, D.C.
Recommended publications
  • A Finding Aid to the Lucy R. Lippard Papers, 1930S-2007, Bulk 1960-1990
    A Finding Aid to the Lucy R. Lippard Papers, 1930s-2007, bulk 1960s-1990, in the Archives of American Art Stephanie L. Ashley and Catherine S. Gaines Funding for the processing of this collection was provided by the Terra Foundation for American Art 2014 May Archives of American Art 750 9th Street, NW Victor Building, Suite 2200 Washington, D.C. 20001 https://www.aaa.si.edu/services/questions https://www.aaa.si.edu/ Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Biographical / Historical.................................................................................................... 2 Scope and Contents........................................................................................................ 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 4 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 4 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 6 Series 1: Biographical Material, circa 1960s-circa 1980s........................................ 6 Series 2: Correspondence, 1950s-2006.................................................................. 7 Series 3: Writings, 1930s-1990s...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • R.B. Kitaj Papers, 1950-2007 (Bulk 1965-2006)
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt3q2nf0wf No online items Finding Aid for the R.B. Kitaj papers, 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Processed by Tim Holland, 2006; Norma Williamson, 2011; machine-readable finding aid created by Caroline Cubé. UCLA Library, Department of Special Collections Manuscripts Division Room A1713, Charles E. Young Research Library Box 951575 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1575 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.library.ucla.edu/libraries/special/scweb/ © 2011 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid for the R.B. Kitaj 1741 1 papers, 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Descriptive Summary Title: R.B. Kitaj papers Date (inclusive): 1950-2007 (bulk 1965-2006) Collection number: 1741 Creator: Kitaj, R.B. Extent: 160 boxes (80 linear ft.)85 oversized boxes Abstract: R.B. Kitaj was an influential and controversial American artist who lived in London for much of his life. He is the creator of many major works including; The Ohio Gang (1964), The Autumn of Central Paris (after Walter Benjamin) 1972-3; If Not, Not (1975-76) and Cecil Court, London W.C.2. (The Refugees) (1983-4). Throughout his artistic career, Kitaj drew inspiration from history, literature and his personal life. His circle of friends included philosophers, writers, poets, filmmakers, and other artists, many of whom he painted. Kitaj also received a number of honorary doctorates and awards including the Golden Lion for Painting at the XLVI Venice Biennale (1995). He was inducted into the American Academy of Arts and Letters (1982) and the Royal Academy of Arts (1985).
    [Show full text]
  • 12 the Female Cool School
    us less primed to notice when the The Female women are dominating in the present. It was an L.A. gallerist who first pointed out to me the “badass Cool School lady painters” working in Los Angeles. right now. “Something’s going on with that,” he said, adding that he was Usually, art movements or “schools,” giving me a scoop, which he was. As acquire names for reasons of soon as their badassery had been expedience. Critic Irving Sandler singled out, I couldn’t help seeing named Color Field Painting, because Sarah Cain, Allison Miller, Laura he needed a title for the chapter Owens, Rebecca Morris, and Dianna on Clyfford Still, Barnett Newman, Molzan as a cohesive group, female and Mark Rothko in his book The artists whose coexistence in the same Triumph of American Painting. Critic region is consequential rather than Jules Langser and his friend Peter coincidental. Because they’re based in Selz coined Hard-Edge Abstraction Los Angeles, and tied together by an because they needed a name for a aesthetic attitude, they remind me of show linking Lorser Feitelson, John the The Cool School posse from Los McClaughlin, and Karl Benjamin— Angeles’ midcentury heyday—Irwin, all California artists with a preference Moses, Bell, Altoon, et al.—studio for sharpness and clarity. The term rats united by a moment and a certain Light and Space emerged similarly spirit. The Cool School, though, is an from a group exhibition’s title. Many of all-male frame of reference, so maybe these schools consisted mostly of men it’s better to adhere to no frame.
    [Show full text]
  • Lives and Works in New York
    Jon Kessler Lives and works in New York Selected Solo Exhibitions 2008 Unlimited, Art Basel, Basel Jon Kessler, Reg Vardy Gallery, University of Sunderland, UK Jon Kessler, Louisiana Museum of Moderne Kunst, Copenhagen 2007 Galerie Hans Mayer, Dusseldorf Arndt and Partner, Berlin Jon Kessler, The Drawing Center, New York, NY 2006 The Place at 4 AM, Phoenix Kulturstiftung/Sammlung Falckenberg 2005 Hermes, Tokyo, Japan Jon Kessler, MOMA P.S. 1, Long Island City, NY 2004 Deitch Projects, New York, NY Hermes, Forum Gallery, Tokyo 2003 Hermes, Tokyo, Japan 2002 Hermes, Tokyo, Japan 1999 Luhring Augustine Gallery, New York, NY 1997 Jon Kessler, The University of the Arts, Philadelphia, PA 1996 Jon Kessler, The Augustus Saint Gardens Memorial, Cornish, NH 1994 Luhring Augustine Gallery, New York Jon Kessler’s Asia, Kestner-Gesellschaft, Hannover; Neue Galerie am Landesmuseum Joanneum, Graz Jon Kessler, Salzburger Kunstverein, Salzburg Jon Kessler, Puerto de Santander, Santander 1993 Jon Kessler, Kunstverein, Hamburg 1992 Galerie Max Hetzler, Cologne Luhring Augustine Gallery, New York, NY Jon Kessler, Nanba City Hall, Osaka Jon Kessler, Spiral Garden, Tokyo 1991 Galerie Metropol, Vienna Jon Kessler, Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh, PA 1990 Luhring Augustine Gallery, New York, NY Jon Kessler, Centre d'Art d'Ivry 1989 Galerie Crousel - Robelin, Paris Galerie Ursula Schurr, Stuttgart Luhring Augustine Hetzler Gallery, Santa Monica Multiples, Galerie Gisela Capitain, Cologne 1988 Galerie Max Hetzler, Cologne 1987 Luhring, Augustine & Hodes, New
    [Show full text]
  • Tate Papers Issue 12 2009: Lucy R. Lippard
    Tate Papers Issue 12 2009: Lucy R. Lippard http://www.tate.org.uk/research/tateresearch/tatepapers/09autumn/lippa... ISSN 1753-9854 TATE’S ONLINE RESEARCH JOURNAL Landmark Exhibitions Issue Curating by Numbers Lucy R. Lippard Cultural amnesia – imposed less by memory loss than by deliberate political strategy – has drawn a curtain over much important curatorial work done in the past four decades. As this amnesia has been particularly prevalent in the fields of feminism and oppositional art, it is heartening to see young scholars addressing the history of exhibitions and hopefully resurrecting some of its more marginalised events. I have never become a proper curator. Most of the fifty or so shows I have curated since 1966 have been small, not terribly ‘professional’, and often held in unconventional venues, ranging from store windows, the streets, union halls, demonstrations, an old jail, libraries, community centres, and schools … plus a few in museums. I have no curating methodology nor any training in museology, except for working at the Library of the Museum of Modern Art, New York, for a couple of years when I was just out of college. But that experience – the only real job I have ever had – probably prepared me well for the archival, informational aspect of conceptual art. I shall concentrate here on the first few exhibitions I organised in the 1960s and early 1970s, especially those with numbers as their titles. To begin with, my modus operandi contradicted, or simply ignored, the connoisseurship that is conventionally understood to be at the heart of curating. I have always preferred the inclusive to the exclusive, and both conceptual art and feminism satisfied an ongoing desire for the open-ended.
    [Show full text]
  • Eva Hesse Is One of the Most Renowned American Artists to Come of Age in the Immediate Aftermath of the Abstract Expressionists
    "I think art is a total thing. A total person giving a contribution. It is an essence, a soul.. In my inner soul art and life are inseparable" SYNOPSIS Eva Hesse is one of the most renowned American artists to come of age in the immediate aftermath of The Abstract Expressionists. Having fled her native Germany during the rise of Nazism, Hesse was originally schooled in American abstract painting and commercial design practices. She originally pursued a career in commercial textile design in New York City, but Hesse's practice as an expressionist painter led her to increasingly experiment with industrial and every-day, or "found" materials, such as rope, string, wire, rubber, and fiberglass. Reducing her means in the spirit of Minimalism, Hesse explored by way of the simplest materials how to suggest a wide range of organic associations, psychological moods, and what might be called proto- feminist, sexual innuendo. She also experimented with expressing semi-whimsical states of mind rarely explored in the modern era until © The Art Story Foundation – All rights Reserved For more movements, artists and ideas on Modern Art visit www.TheArtStory.org her all-too-brief debut. Thus Hesse arrived quickly at a new kind of abstract painting, as well as a kind of so-called "eccentric," freestanding sculpture. KEY IDEAS Professionally trained as an abstract painter and commercial designer, Hesse is a paradigmatic postwar American artist, much like Ellsworth Kelly, who regarded painting not as a two- dimensional surface, but as an object on the wall to be extended into the space of the viewer before it.
    [Show full text]
  • Jakubowska – Feminst Revolution
    The “Abakans” and the feminist revolution Agata Jakubowska (Adam Mickiewicz University) In March of 2007, the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles hosted an exhibition titled WACK! Art and the Feminist Revolution, which was described as “the first comprehensive, historical exhibition to exam- ine the international foundations and legacy of feminist art, [that] focuses on the crucial period 1965-80, during which the majority of feminist activ- ism and artmaking occurred internationally”.1 One of the intentions of the curator, Connie Butler, was to shatter the canon of feminist art, compris- ing almost exclusively American artists, by including “women of other geographies, formal approaches, sociopolitical alliances, and critical and theoretical positions”.2 Among the 120 female artists invited to the exhibi- tion was Magdalena Abakanowicz. Shown was her Abakan Red (1969), a work from a series of large pieces of woven sisal made in the late 60’s/early 70’s and named Abakans after the artist. Abakanowicz was an artist who never belonged to the feminist art movement. Her inclusion in this exhibition devoted to the ties between art and feminism was a result of, as can be surmised from the construction of the exhibition, as well as from remarks appearing in the publications ac- companying it, certain feminist aspects detected in her Abakan works. These aspects were highly varied. For one, it was acknowledged that Abakanowicz belonged to a group of female artists “working from vastly different cultural referents [that] have been empowered by ideas of earth, mother, and Amazon and inspired by their iconography”.3 Her Abakan _____________ 1 Wack! Art and the Feminist Revolution, curator: Connie Butler, Museum of Contemporary Art, Los Angeles, Mar.-Jul.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons in Promiscuity
    LESSONS IN PROMISCUITY: PATTERNING AND THE NEW DECORATIVENESS IN ART OF THE 1970s A ND 1980s ANNA KATZ Robert Zakanitch Dragon Fire, 1983 16 In 1975 in New York a group of artists gathered in the Warren Street loft of Robert Zakanitch to discuss a shared tendency that had emerged in their work in the preceding several years. Joyce Kozloff in her colorful paintings was combining patterns gleaned from architectural ornamentation, pottery, and textiles observed in Mexico, Morocco, Turkey, and Spain (fig. 1); Tony Robbin was using a modi- fied spray gun and patterned stencils to create spatially complex grids in lyric colors (pp. 122–25); Zakanitch was making paintings of massive, luscious blossoms in repeated patterns that evoked wallpaper and linoleum rugs (fig. 2); and Miriam Schapiro was collag- ing found bits of lace and other domestic fabrics associated with women’s lives in boisterous compositions (fig. 3). Joining them was Amy Goldin, an art critic with a strong interest in Islamic art, who had identified an “oddly persistent interest in pattern” in the 1 1 Amy Goldin, “The ‘New’ Whitney 1975 Whitney Biennial. Biennial: Pattern Emerging?,” Art in America, May/June 1975, 72–73. It is tempting to imagine that they gathered in secret, huddling together to confess their shared trespass, their violation of one of the strongest prohibitions of modern art: the decorative. But in truth their art was exuberant, and so were they, giddy with the thrill of destabilizing entrenched hierarchies, and the possibilities that unleashed. They identified
    [Show full text]
  • The Greatest Women Artists of the Twentieth Century
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Conceptual Revolutions in Twentieth-Century Art Volume Author/Editor: David W. Galenson Volume Publisher: Cambridge University Press Volume ISBN: 978-0-521-11232-1 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/gale08-1 Publication Date: October 2009 Title: The Greatest Women Artists of the Twentieth Century Author: David W. Galenson URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5788 Chapter 5: The Greatest Women Artists of the Twentieth Century Introduction Recent decades have witnessed an intense interest in the role of women in the art of the past. Scores of museum exhibitions have been devoted to the work of women artists, and scores of monographs have examined the contributions of women to our artistic heritage. As is common in the humanities, however, the scholarly attention devoted to the role of women artists has been qualitative rather than quantitative. As a result, we now have a large amount of scholarship that analyzes the contributions of individual women artists, or of particular groups of women artists, but we do not have studies that provide systematic evaluation of the relative importance of different women artists. The present study will begin to remedy this deficiency. Specifically, this study will investigate the question of which women made the greatest contributions to art during the past century. The choice of this time period reflects the fact that women played a far greater role in the art of the twentieth century than in any earlier time. So for example the third edition of Nancy Heller’s Women Artists, published in 1997, a textbook written “to provide a richly illustrated overview of some of the most interesting professional women painters and sculptors in the Western world, from the Renaissance to the present,” devotes fully 144 pages to the twentieth century, substantially more than the total of only 97 pages devoted to all earlier centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of the Critical Discourse on the Work of Eva Hesse Michele
    An Analysis of the Critical Discourse on the Work of Eva Hesse by Michele Millard Department of Art History, McGilI University, Montreal September 1991 A Thesls submltted to the Faculty of Graduate Studles and Research ln partial fulfillment of the requlrements for the degree of Master of Am. (c) Michele Mlllard,1991 1 Table of Contents Introduction.................. ........ .......... .. ..................................................... 3 Chapte, One ..... ............ ......... ............ ........................................................ 8 Part 1 ......... .... ............... ..... .......... ...... .. ........ .. .......................... 8 Part Il ............................................................................................................ 10 Part III ............................................................................................................. 13 Part IV ........................................ .................................................................... 18 Chapte, Two ............................................................................................. 23 Part 1 .............................................................................................................23 Part Il .............................................................................................................24 Chapte, Th,ee .............................................................................................. 30 Conclusion ......................................................................................................36
    [Show full text]
  • Press Review
    Press SUN WOMEN Louise Bourgeois Helen Frankenthaler Eva Hesse Jacqueline Humphries Lee Krasner Joan Mitchell Louise Nevelson Curated by Jérôme Neutres April 24 – June 29 2019 Whitewall , June 27, 2019 “SUN WOMEN” Pays Tribute to the Artists Who Fought for Equal Acknowledgment By Pearl Fontaine At the Charles Riva Collection in Brussels, curator Jérômre Neutres has conceived an exhibition of works by seven artists, entitled “SUN WOMEN.” Named for Lee Krasner’s series “The Sun Woman,” the exhibition features a group of artists whose works are, today, known to be part of the women’s emancipation movement of the 20th century. “I feel totally female. I didn’t compete with men and I don’t want to look like a man!” said Louise Nevelson. Not to be categorized because of gender, the artists on view—including Krasner, Nevelson, Louise Bourgeoise, Helen Frankenthaler, Eva Hesse, Jacqueline Humphries, and Joan Mitchell— sought to obtain equal acknowledgment as their male counterparts. Great masters throughout the ages were never referred to as “da Vinci, the male artist,” or “Hemingway, the male writer,” so neither should female creators be referred to as such. Instead of essentializing the work of these women, the exhibition presents them as artists neglected in a scene that has always favored males. A recurring theme of abstraction runs amongst each artist’s style—something which Eric de Chassey suggests is to be expected, since abstraction is “a liberation, the triumph of artistic freedom as a possibility, unhindered by external references.” By committing to an abstracted practice, these artists were essentially pledging themselves to defying the norms (social, sexual, political, and psychological) of their times, where women were held to standards of domesticated delicacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Encrypted Object: the Secret World of Sixties Sculpture
    Title Page The Encrypted Object: The Secret World of Sixties Sculpture Joanne Louise Applin University College London PhD nL ABSTRACT This thesis examines the work of artists Lucas Samaras,Lee Bontecou and HC Westermann, specifically the way in which they have been excluded from dominant accounts of 1960s sculptural practice. I explore the ways in which a theory of 'secrecy' provides a framework through which to think about each of these artists. Chapter one focuses on Samaras's use of small-scale boxes in relation to his dialogue with the Minimal cubic structure, whilst the second chapter examines the structures of Bontecou in terms of their 'secrecy'. Working from welded steel armatures, Bontecou developed a unique practice of stretching dirty, worn skeins of fabric over the metal structure, always with a gaping hole backed with black felt, a disturbing void (MA around which the surface is organised and the spectatorial encounter disturbed. Unlike the voracious mode of looking Bontecou's works engender, or the partial, fragmented 'peering' offered by Samaras's boxes, Westermann's works require a type of looking that has more in common with the physical act of 'drifting'. I cast both the viewing experience and the mode of construction Westermann's works demand, in terms of 'bricolage' and 'braconnage' (or 'poaching). The concluding chapter analyses the role of the artistic homage and notion of influence, taking as model the work of psychoanalysts Nicolas Abraham and Maria Torok on haunting and secrecy in relation to the work of Westermann alongside that of Bruce Nauman and Rachel Whiteread. In chapter four I introduce the idea of the 'phantom, as a way of thinking through the problems of inheritance at work in the artistic homage in terms of a series of ruptures, using Abraham and Toroks' concept of the 'transgenerational phantom', in which familial secretsare unwittingly inherited by one's ancestors.
    [Show full text]