Aviation Liability Law Developments in 1990 Randal R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aviation Liability Law Developments in 1990 Randal R Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 57 | Issue 1 Article 2 1991 Aviation Liability Law Developments in 1990 Randal R. Craft rJ . Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Randal R. Craft rJ ., Aviation Liability Law Developments in 1990, 57 J. Air L. & Com. 1 (1991) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol57/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. AVIATION LIABILITY LAW DEVELOPMENTS IN 1990 RANDAL R. CRAFT, JR.* INTRODUCTION .................................. 3 I. GENERAL LEGAL ISSUES .................. 3 A. IN PERSONAM JURISDICTION ....... 3 B. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION ... 10 C. VENUE AND FORUM NON CONVENIENS .......................... 15 D. CHOICE OF LAW ...................... 25 E. DISCOVERY ........................... 36 F. EVIDENCE ............................. 41 II. LIABILITY OF AIR CARRIERS IN WARSA W CONVENTION CARRIAGE .................. 50 A. EXCLUSIVITY ......................... 50 B. INJURIES AND EVENTS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE CONVENTION ....... 52 C. DAMAGES RECOVERABLE ........... 58 D. CARGO AND BAGGAGE .............. 64 E. LIMITATIONS OF ACTION ........... 67 II. LIABILITY OF OPERATORS OF AIRCRAFT IN NON- WARSA W CARRIAGE ............... 68 A. GENERAL AIRLINE LIABILITY ....... 68 * Partner, Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City. B.S., Aerospace Engineering, University of Texas (Austin), 1964; J.D., Georgetown University Law Center, 1968. This paper reflects the significant contributions of, among others, Leonard L. Fleisig, Virginia A. Harper, Michael S. Mitchell, Patrick E. Bradley, and Louis R. Martinez, all of whom are attorneys in the New York office of Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens. The author gratefully acknowledges their assistance. 2 JOURNAL OF AIR LA WAND COMMERCE [57 B. DENIED BOARDING, EXCLUSION, OR REMOVAL FROM AIRCRAFT ..... 80 C. CARGO AND BAGGAGE .............. 84 D. LIMITATIONS OF ACTIONS ......... 91 E. GENERAL LIABILITY OF OTHER OPERATORS AND OWNERS OF AIRCRAFT ............................. 92 IV. LIABILITY OF MANUFACTURERS AND SUPPLIERS ................................. 93 A. GENERAL .............................. 93 B. ALLOCATION OF FAULT ............. 98 C. DISCLAIMERS ......................... 103 D. GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR DEFENSE .............................. 110 E. DAMAGES .............................. 122 V. LIABILITY OF THE UNITED STATES: THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT .............. 125 A. GENERAL .............................. 125 B. DISCRETIONARY FUNCTION EXCEPTION ........................... 131 C. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS ..... 132 D. LIABILITY OF STATES OF THE UNITED STATES ...................... 139 VI. LIABILITY OF FOREIGN STATES: THE FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT.. 140 A. GENERAL .............................. 140 B. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION... 143 C. FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES ....... 148 D. JURY TRIAL ........................... 149 E. DAMAGES .............................. 150 VII. LIABILITY OF AIRPORTS ................... 151 VIII. LIABILITY OF INSURERS ................. 154 A. COVERAGE ............................ 154 B. EXCLUSIONS .......................... 160 IX. MISCELLANEOUS .......................... 164 A. AIRPORT AIRSPACE AND EMINENT DO M AIN ............................... 164 B. DRUG AND ALCOHOL ABUSE ....... 169 1991] DEVELOPMENTS C. ADVERTISING ......................... 170 D. OTH ER ................................ 171 INTRODUCTION THE YEAR 1990 has been marked by the usual assort- ment of court decisions, some lucid and some abstruse, on the various issues that make aviation law constantly in- teresting. This extensive survey covers those 1990 and late 1989 aviation law decisions that are considered most significant, along with some other decisions that may indi- rectly affect aviation law. I. GENERAL LEGAL ISSUES A. In PersonamJurisdiction In Charlie Fowler Evangelistic Association v. Cessna Aircraft, Inc. ,' the plaintiff Association instituted a diversity action, in a Florida federal district court, against the Cessna Air- craft Company and Dean Aircraft Service, Inc. (Dean), a Mississippi airplane repair facility, seeking damages aris- ing from the crash of the plaintiffs' Cessna aircraft in Florida. Charles A. Fowler flew the Association's Cessna air- plane on a business trip from Florida to Key Field in Me- ridian, Mississippi. While preparing the aircraft for the return trip, Fowler discovered that the starboard engine would not start. Fowler was referred to Dean, and Dean repaired the engine so that it would operate. On the re- turn trip, the starboard engine quit while Fowler was at- tempting to land at Bay County Airport in Panama City, Florida, and the Cessna crashed. The plaintiff alleged that Dean's negligent repairs caused the crash. Dean was a Mississippi corporation with its principal place of business in Mississippi. It had no offices, employ- ees, or agents in Florida and did not conduct any business in that state. Nevertheless, the plaintiff contended that , 911 F.2d 1564 (11 th Cir. 1990). 4 JOURNAL OF AIR LA WAND COMMERCE [57 Dean was subject to personal jurisdiction in Florida be- cause Fowler told Dean that he was from Florida and that the aircraft was heading back to that state and also be- cause Dean was listed in "The Aviation Telephone Direc- tory" for the Southeastern and Gulf States, which includes Mississippi and Florida. The district court dismissed the action against Dean for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court held that these two contacts were not enough to show that Dean "purposely directed" activities at Florida residents. Plain- tiff appealed Dean's dismissal.2 The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Dean. In so doing, the court noted that Dean's limited contacts with Florida were principally the result of Fowler's actions and stated that, "unilateral acts by the plaintiff cannot supply the necessary minimum contacts, or show that a defendant has purposefully availed itself of the benefits and protections of the forum state's laws.' 3 In Macario v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc. and Beech Air- craft Corp.,4 plaintiff instituted a federal diversity action in Pennsylvania against Pratt & Whitney (Pratt) for breach of contract and against Beech Aircraft (Beech) for inten- tional interference with contractual relations. The plain- tiff was the administrator for the estate of Matthew Macario, who was killed when his Beech King Air crashed in Cedarville, New Jersey. This action was the third commenced against Pratt as the result of the crash. The first lawsuit, a wrongful death action, was settled after Pratt agreed to pay plaintiff $6,000,000 and to issue a service bulletin informing own- ers of aircraft equipped with PT-6 engines of the potential for engine rollback due to contamination of the automatic fuel control, along with the availability of filters that would prevent or reduce the likelihood of such contami- nation. In the present action, the plaintiff claimed that 2 Id. 3 Id. at 1566. 4 No. 90-3906 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 6, 1990) (LEXIS, Genfed library, Dist File). 1991] DEVELOPMENTS 5 Pratt had breached its obligation to issue a service bulle- tin.5 Plaintiff also alleged that Beech had persuaded Pratt to renege on the settlement agreement and to refrain from issuing the service bulletin by threatening that Beech would inform owners of Beech aircraft equipped with PT-6 engines that the service bulletin would impair the operation of the aircraft. Beech moved to dismiss, claiming that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over it because it did not do business in Pennsylvania. Beech claimed: (1) it was a Delaware cor- poration with its principal place of business in Wichita, Kansas; (2) it was not authorized, registered, or qualified to do business in any state other than Kansas and Colo- rado; and (3) it did not maintain any place of business in Pennsylvania or have any officers or employees in Penn- sylvania. Beech also argued that the sale of its airplanes and parts is negotiated, completed, and performed in Kansas and that the delivery of all airplanes and parts oc- curs there. Finally, Beech contended that any contacts that it had with Pratt regarding the service bulletin in question occurred outside of Pennsylvania. The plaintiff argued that the court had both specific and general jurisdiction over Beech because Beech did busi- ness in Pennsylvania and because the cause of action arose, or the harm occurred, in Pennsylvania. In support of his position, the plaintiff submitted several affidavits showing that Beech had continuous and substantial con- tacts with Pennsylvania sufficient to bring him within Pennsylvania's long-arm jurisdiction. The district court agreed with the plaintiff, and denied Beech's motion to dismiss. The court held that it was not necessary to determine whether the court had "general" jurisdiction over Beech because there were sufficient facts to support "specific" jurisdiction. The court stated: The essence of plaintiff's (third) lawsuit is that Pratt has breached a settlement agreement entered into before this - Id. at 2. 6 JOURNAL OF AIR LA WAND COMMERCE [57 court in the first lawsuit, and Beech acted improperly in inducing Pratt to breach that agreement. The settlement agreement was made in the Commonwealth of Penn- sylvania, the harm caused by Beech's alleged inducement of
Recommended publications
  • Linguistic Factors Contributing to the Crash of Avianca Flight 052
    J. F. Oberlin University “Tell Them We are in Emergency” - Linguistic Factors Contributing to the Crash of Avianca Flight 052 COOKSON Simon アビアンカ航空52便の墜落に関わる言語的要因 -「彼らに緊急だと伝えるのだ」 桜美林大学 桜美林論考『言語文化研究』第2号 2011年3月 The Journal of J. F. Oberlin University Studies in Language and Culture, The Second Issue, March 2011 - 17 - NII-Electronic Library Service J. F. Oberlin University Keywords: airline accident, ICAO, language proficiency requirements, ‘Swiss cheese’ model 要 約 1990年1月25日、アビアンカ航空52便は、ニューヨークのジョン・F・ケネディ国際空港 へ着陸を試みたあとに、燃料切れで墜落した。いくつかの要因が墜落に関わっているが、 その中には言語的要因も含まれる。そのためにこの事故は、ICAO(国際民間航空機関)に よって、操縦士と管制官の航空英語能力の向上を、世界規模で目指すプログラムを立ち上 げる必要性を訴えるために引用された。そして、2011年3月5日より、このプログラムの適 応が開始された。本稿では、この事故を「スイスチーズ」の事故原因モデルを使って分析し た。このモデルは、Reason(1990)が提唱したもので、後にWiegmannとShappel(l 2003)に よって改定されたものである。分析結果は、言語的要因の重大性を確認するとともに、数々 の言語以外の重大要因を示唆した。特に、ストレス、疲労、文化的要因が、フライト・クルー のコミュニケーションに影響を与えたことを明らかにした。 Abstract On 25 January 1990, Avianca Flight 052 ran out of fuel and crashed after a missed approach to John F. Kennedy Airport in New York. A number of causal factors were involved in the crash, some of which were linguistic. The accident has accordingly been cited by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in justification of a worldwide programme to improve the language proficiency of pilots and air traffic controllers that came into full effect on 5 March 2011. In this paper the accident is analysed using the ‘Swiss cheese’ model of accident causation developed by Reason (1990) and adapted by Wiegmann and Shappell (2003). The analysis shows that, while the linguistic factors were indeed significant, there were numerous non-linguistic causal factors that were also significant. Furthermore, stress, fatigue and cultural factors are all shown to have had an adverse effect on the communication performance of the flight crew.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Impact of Cross-Culture on Airline Pilots' Safety Performance in the Middle-East and North Africa (MENA) Region
    Dissertations and Theses 10-2014 National Culture: Understanding the Impact of Cross-culture on Airline Pilots' Safety Performance in the Middle-East and North Africa (MENA) Region Shareef Abdulla Kaddas Al-Romaithi Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University - Daytona Beach Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.erau.edu/edt Part of the Aviation Safety and Security Commons Scholarly Commons Citation Al-Romaithi, Shareef Abdulla Kaddas, "National Culture: Understanding the Impact of Cross-culture on Airline Pilots' Safety Performance in the Middle-East and North Africa (MENA) Region" (2014). Dissertations and Theses. 152. https://commons.erau.edu/edt/152 This Dissertation - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NATIONAL CULTURE: UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF CROSS- CULTURE ON AIRLINE PILOTS’ SAFETY PERFORMANCE IN THE MIDDLE-EAST AND NORTH AFRICA (MENA) REGION by Shareef Abdulla Kaddas Al-Romaithi A Dissertation Submitted to the College of Aviation in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Aviation Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Daytona Beach, Florida October 2014 ABSTRACT Researcher: Shareef Abdulla Kaddas Al-Romaithi Title: NATIONAL CULTURE: UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF CROSS-CULTURE ON AIRLINE PILOTS’ SAFETY PERFORMANCE IN THE MIDDLE-EAST AND NORTH AFRICA (MENA) REGION Institution: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Degree: Doctor of Philosophy in Aviation Year: 2014 The continuous expansion of Middle Eastern airlines has created a pilot shortage. Since the local pilot population in the Middle East is relatively small, airlines have been relying on foreign pilots to satisfy their operational requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigated Speech in the Crash of Avianca Flight 052
    Wright State University CORE Scholar International Symposium on Aviation International Symposium on Aviation Psychology - 2015 Psychology 2015 ‘We Need Priority Please’ Mitigated Speech in the Crash of Avianca Flight 052 Simon Cookson Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/isap_2015 Part of the Other Psychiatry and Psychology Commons Repository Citation Cookson, S. (2015). ‘We Need Priority Please’ Mitigated Speech in the Crash of Avianca Flight 052. 18th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, 578-583. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/isap_2015/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the International Symposium on Aviation Psychology at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Symposium on Aviation Psychology - 2015 by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ‘WE NEED PRIORITY PLEASE’ MITIGATED SPEECH IN THE CRASH OF AVIANCA FLIGHT 052 Simon Cookson J. F. Oberlin University Tokyo, Japan On 25 January 1990, Avianca Flight 052 was flying from Columbia to the United States when it crashed after a missed approach to JFK Airport in New York. The direct cause of the accident was fuel exhaustion but the NTSB investigation identified multiple causal factors. The Avianca captain, who was flying the aircraft, repeatedly instructed the first officer to notify ATC about the fuel emergency. The first officer, however, did not use the word ‘emergency’ but instead requested ‘priority’ and told ATC that the airplane was ‘running out of fuel’. Why did the first officer mitigate the captain’s instructions? This paper hypothesizes that a range of factors relating to national culture, professional culture, organizational culture and stress may have contributed to the first officer’s use of mitigated speech.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Factors Industry News ! Volume XI
    Aviation Human Factors Industry News ! Volume XI. Issue 24, December 13, 2015 Hello all, To subscribe send an email to: [email protected] In this weeks edition of Aviation Human Factors Industry News you will read the following stories: ★NTSB Releases Video ★Loss of Control Prevention Highlighting Importance of Update Procedural Compliance for Commercial Pilots ★Part installed upside down leads to fatal crash ★Air Asia Report: Distraction, Crew Miscommunication Led To Stall ★Fatal US Army Crashes Prompt Safety Stand-Down ★White Paper Published Prior To Indonesian Aviation Authority ★NTSB: Icing, Malfunctions Led To Report On Air Asia Accident Citation Crash Detailing History Of Rudder Problems ★And Much More Human Factors Industry News 1 NTSB Releases Video Highlighting Importance of Procedural Compliance for Commercial Pilots The National Transportation Safety Board released a nine- minute video that highlights the crucial role that procedural compliance plays in commercial aviation safety. "Aviation flight operating procedures are developed and refined to provide repeatable steps for safely flying a plane in order to minimize the risk of an accident," said NTSB Chairman Christopher A. Hart. "So it's disheartening when we learn from our investigations that the very procedures that are designed to ensure safety were deviated from, leading to a preventable accident." The video, which is primarily targeted at pilots, uses findings from seven commercial airplane accidents to show how deviations from standard operating procedures can initiate a chain of events that may lead to devastating consequences. The accidents referenced include the 2013 crashes of Asiana flight 214 in San Francisco and UPS flight 1354 in Birmingham, Alabama.
    [Show full text]
  • KLM Flight Folder
    KLM Flight Folder Requirements Elicitation and Solution Specification for an Electronic Flight Bag A.M. Spannenburg, BSc. August 2011 KLM FLIGHT FOLDER Requirements Elicitation and Solution Specification for an Electronic Flight Bag MASTER’S THESIS University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands Author: A.M. Spannenburg Internal supervisors: Dr. ir. C.P. Katsma Dr. ir. P.A.T. van Eck External supervisors: Ing. B. Gouma Drs. ing. B.A. Dikkers All rights reserved. The copyright of the master’s thesis rests with the author. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in whole or in part, in any form or by any means without prior permission in writing of the author. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This master’s thesis would not have been possible with the help and support of several people, for whom I would like to take the opportunity to thank them here. First, I would like to thank Mr. P.F. Hartman and Mr. M.T.C. van Hout for providing the opportunity to put theory into practice at KLM. Secondly, I would like to thank my external supervisors at KLM Bastiaan Gouma and Brend Dikkers for their input and advice throughout the project. In addition I would like to express my gratitude towards all KLM employees willing to help me. I’m also especially thankful for the continued support and supervision of my academic supervisors Christiaan Katsma and Paul van Eck. I would also like to thank my parents, family and friends in their interest and support. Last, but certainly not least, I would like to thank Marjolein for her incredible patience and support.
    [Show full text]
  • PENNSYLVANIA PILOT Vol 25 No 4, Winter 2014/15
    AERO CLUB OF PENNSYLVANIA PENNSYLVANIA PILOT Vol 25 No 4, Winter 2014/15 www.aeroclubpa.org Published quarterly by the Aero Club of Pennsylvania for those interested in aviation in the Greater Delaware Valley Photo Album Aero Club calendar was chock full this fall Philadelphia Tower Tour munity Day on October 4 where On September 24, eighteen the Aero Club set up a table to members of the Aero Club visit- sell books from the Al Sheves ed the Philadelphia Air Traffic collection. The sale raised money Control center. The facility hous- for the Aero Club / Al Sheves es the clearance, ground and Memorial Scholarship. We tower control, as well as, the repeated the same sale at the approach control radar opera- annual Rotorfest helicopter show tion and a large training simula- at Brandywine Airport. The two Looking out over the airport tor. In smaller groups, we got events raised just over $700. from the Philly Tower cab tours of the tower and then the radar room. At any one time, Chester County Warbirds there are as many as 30 people On September 14, members of on the job at the facility. Philly the Aero Club visited a private International Airport is the collection of warbirds at the busiest single airport in terms Chester County Airport. See the of operations in the northeast. full story on page 3. Eagles Mere Visit Seaplane Base Event The Aero Club planned a fly out On October 4, members of the to the Eagles Mere Air Museum Aero Club setup a display at the “History and Mystery Weekend” A gaggle of antique aircraft on October 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Operator's Flight Safety Handbook, Issue 2
    THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK CEO STATEMENT ON CORPORATE SAFETY CULTURE COMMITMENT Corporate Safety Culture Commitment i June 2000 Issue 1 CORE VALUES Among our core values, we will include: l Safety, health and the environment l Ethical behaviour l Valuing people FUNDAMENTAL BELIEFS Our fundamental safety beliefs are: l Safety is a core business and personal value l Safety is a source of our competitive advantage l We will strengthen our business by making safety excellence an integral part of all flight and ground activities l We believe that all accidents and incidents are preventable l All levels of line management are accountable for our safety performance, starting with the Chief Executive Officer (CEO)/Managing Director CORE ELEMENTS OF OUR SAFETY APPROACH The five core elements of our safety approach include: Top Management Commitment l Safety excellence will be a component of our mission l Senior leaders will hold line management and all employees accountable for safety performance l Senior leaders and line management will demonstrate their continual commitment to safety Responsibility & Accountability of All Employees l Safety performance will be an important part of our management/employee evaluation system l We will recognise and reward flight and ground safety performance l Before any work is done, we will make everyone aware of the safety rules and processes as well as their personal responsibility to observe them Clearly Communicated Expectations of Zero Incide nts l We will have a formal written safety goal, and we
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 XLL Master Plan Final Narrative
    Queen City Municipal Airport Allentown, Pennsylvania Master Plan Update Prepared by: C&S Companies Final Report May 2021 Queen City Municipal Airport Master Plan Update Table of Contents Section 1— Introduction ___________________________________________________________ 1–1 Section 2— Airport Inventory _______________________________________________________ 2–1 2.1 Airport System Planning Role _________________________________________________ 2–1 2.2 Surrounding Airports ________________________________________________________ 2–2 2.3 Socioeconomic Data ________________________________________________________ 2–2 2.4 Land Use and Zoning ________________________________________________________ 2–5 2.5 Climatological Data & Wind Analysis ____________________________________________ 2–8 2.6 Airfield Facilities __________________________________________________________ 2–11 2.7 Access, Circulation, & Parking ________________________________________________ 2–20 2.8 General Aviation Facilities ___________________________________________________ 2–20 2.9 Environmental ____________________________________________________________ 2–25 Section 3— Forecasts of Demand _____________________________________________________ 3-1 3.1 Forecast Overview ___________________________________________________________ 3-1 3.2 Identification of Aviation Demand Elements _______________________________________ 3-1 3.3 Data Sources _______________________________________________________________ 3-2 3.4 Historical Aviation Activity ____________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life
    Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life JUNE 2003 PUBLIC USE AIRPORTS BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION Commercial/Primary (29) Metropolitan (20) Regional (66) Community (102) Limited Use (33) Joint Use — Military/Commercial (2) The contents of this report reflect the views of the author who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the State of California or the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. This report was prepared with funds from a grant provided by the United States Government (80%) and funds from the State of California (20%). Aviation in California: Benefits to Our Economy and Way of Life FINAL REPORT Prepared for BUSINESS,TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSING AGENCY CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS Submitted by Economics Research Associates JUNE 2003 ECONOMIC IMPACT STUDY ADVISORY COMMITTEE Nancy Benjamin Alan R. Tubbs Study Project Manager District Field Services Manager California Department of Transportation Airborne Express, Mather Field Division of Aeronautics Chuck Oldham R. Austin Wiswell Robert Chung Chief California Transportation Commission California Department of Transportation Division of Aeronautics Carl Williams Senior Policy Director Michael Armstrong California Space Authority, Inc. (CSA) Senior Lead Planner Southern California Association of Governments Bonnie Cornwall (SCAG) Program Manager Division
    [Show full text]
  • Sound Spectrum Analysis
    FSI Flight SafetySECOND QUARTER Information 2004 SECOND QUARTER 2004 Sound Spectrum Analysis Enhanced Vision Systems Communications System Safety Accidents / Incidents FSI CONTENTS To FSI Subscribers: Welcome to the sixth issue of Flight Safety Information Quarterly Journal. The jour- nal is produced in order to create safety awareness, pro- vide timely and valuable safety information, and to ulti- mately prevent accidents. I welcome contributing input, articles, and photos from the readers. Curt Lewis, P.E., CSP Published by www.fsinfo.org 3 Sound Spectrum Analysis Managing Editor Curt Lewis P.E., CSP 7 Enhanced Vision Systems [email protected] Associate Editors Erica Lush 9 Communications [email protected] Erdem Serifoglu [email protected] 13 System Safety Webmaster Randy Enberg 16 Accidents / Incidents Overview [email protected] 2 FSI Sound Spectrum Analysis (Another Investigative Technique) American Airlines Flight 587 What if we could detect the cause of aircraft How are CVR recordings analyzed? The an- damage simply by listening to the sounds re- swer: sound spectrum analysis. Sound spec- corded in the cockpit? Detecting damage to air- trum analysis is a technique that compares the craft after an accident or incident is conducted amplitudes of sounds, and plots the distribution with the help of various tools and analysis tech- on a three-dimensional graph. This type of niques. Cockpit Voice Recorder (CVR) data is a analysis depicts changes or modulations in useful tool that investigators use to obtain audio sounds, and it can pinpoint the time when these information from the cockpit during the se- changes occur. quence of flight.
    [Show full text]
  • Mental Health Services Provided in the Aftermath of Aviation Disasters
    MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES PROVIDED IN THE AFTERMATH OF AVIATION DISASTERS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the School of Human Service Professions Widener University In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Psychology By William Christopher Rizzo Institute for Graduate Clinical Psychology June, 2003 2 COPYRIGHT BY WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER RIZZO JUNE 2003 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND DEDICATION I would like to acknowledge the support and assistance of my dissertation committee in completing this project: Dr. Beth Howlett (Chair), Dr. Clifford DeCato, Dr. Dennis Debiak, and Dr. Virginia Brabender (Reader). Without their guidance and careful editing, the quality of this work would not have been able to shine as brightly. I also want to acknowledge the support I received from Gail Dunham, president of the National Air Disaster Alliance/Foundation and friend, who showed her generosity by creating a space within NADA/F for this research to take place. Her tireless efforts to improve air safety have been recognized by many. To Beverly, my beautiful wife, I cannot say how grateful I am to have you and Nathan in my life. Your love and understanding during this seemingly endless process has at times been the sole driving force that helped me see it through. To many more happy days for all of us. To my family, you have always been there for me and encouraged me to do my best. Your support during this time has been invaluable, and you gave it freely even when this process interfered with us having time together. 4 This dissertation is dedicated to those whose lives have been forever changed by the tragedy of an aviation disaster.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 2 – Regional Context
    Lehigh Valley International Airport Allentown, Pennsylvania Airport Master Plan Update Section 2 – Regional Context June 2018 Prepared by: C&S Engineers, Inc. Michael Gallis & Associates Campbell Hill Arora Engineers ADCI Unison Consulting Airport Master Plan Update – Regional Context Lehigh Valley International Airport Table of Contents – Regional Context _______________________________________________________ 2‐1 2.1 Introducon ______________________________________________________________ 2‐1 Airports in the Global Economy __________________________________________________ 2‐1 Airports and Economic Regions ___________________________________________________ 2‐1 Nonhub Commercial Airports in the Transportation Network ___________________________ 2‐2 Context for LVIA _______________________________________________________________ 2‐2 Context for Multidimensional Airport Planning ______________________________________ 2‐3 Timeframes and Scenarios in Airport Planning _______________________________________ 2‐4 2.2 The Northeast Context _____________________________________________________ 2‐4 Northeast Urban Structure ______________________________________________________ 2‐5 Northeast Economies __________________________________________________________ 2‐6 Northeast Population Change ____________________________________________________ 2‐8 Northeast Air Hubs ____________________________________________________________ 2‐9 Northeast Highway Congestion __________________________________________________ 2‐10 2.3 New York and Philadelphia
    [Show full text]