The Ethnology of Germany.-Part V. the Jutes and Fomorians

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ethnology of Germany.-Part V. the Jutes and Fomorians The Ethnology of Germany.-Part V. The Jutes and Fomorians. Author(s): H. H. Howorth Source: The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, Vol. 10 (1881), pp. 174-211 Published by: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2841608 . Accessed: 16/06/2014 18:33 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 185.2.32.49 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:33:07 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 174 H. H. HOWORTm.-TlteEthnology of Germa.ny. DISCUSSION. The PRESIDENT inquired whether these Fiji mountaineerswith large heads of hair being pure Melanesians, would, in Prof. Flower's opinion, go against the common view that the mop- headed Papuans owe their peculiarity of hair to mixtures between Malay and Melanesian. He remarked that though Prof. Flower treated the cephalic index as only a subordinate cranial character, he practically showed it in the case of these most dolichocephalic people to be a most valuable race-mark. He called the attention of the meeting to the interesting series of cranial measurements,where four sets of indices in a crossed race showed intermediatedimensions between the two purest races, which as a reduction of hybridity to measurement was a most instructive result, never previouslyequalled. Dr. ALLEN THOuMSON expressed the pleasure with which he bad listened to Prof. Flower's interesting description of the series of Fiji skulls exhibitedto the Institute for the firsttime, in which the Professorcontinued his able and accurate applio-ationof the newer methods of craniological examination and descriptionto the dis- tinction of the races of mankind, as inaugurated bv Broca and others, and in connectionwith which Prof. Flower from his in- timate acqaintance with the subject, and his unrivalled oppor- tunities,was enabled to make important contributionsto ethno- logical science. Dr. Thomson had never before seen such remarkaole examples of Dolichocephaly, without scaphocephalic difformity,as were presented by these skulls, and could not help regarding them as indicating a distinctiverace or familycharacter. Dr. Thomson congratulatedProf. Flower and the Institute on the recent acquisition by the Museum of the Royal College of Surgeons of Dr. Barnard Davis' rich collection of Crania and Skeletons belonging to differentraces, fromwhich, notwithstan-dirig the large amount of intelligentwork bestowedupon it by its foimer possessor, new and useful informationmay be confidentlyexpected in its association with the collectionof the College fromthe investigations of Prof. Flower. The ETHNOLOGYof GERMANY.-PART V. THE JUTES AND FOMORIANS. By H. H. HOWORTH,Esq., F.S.A. IT is the almost invariable result of taking a new step in ethnologyas in other sciences,that we are obliged to modify considerablyour views along the whole line. The freshvantage that we gain enables us to see thatwhat was formerlyheld as This content downloaded from 185.2.32.49 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:33:07 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions H. H. HOWORTH-The Ethnologyof Germany. 175 indisputable,is based upon veryfrail evidence indeed,and we are constrainedto alter our pictureaccordingly. This makes it veryimportant that we shouldmake suLreof everystep. In a formerpaper I have arguedthat the accountsof the set- t]einentof the Saxons on the English coasts,as containedin the Anglo-SaxonChronicle, are forthe mostpart as fabulousas the storyof Romulus,and that farfrom their having come here in the middleof the fifthcentury, and settled as conquerors,that they came at least a centuryearlier, and that theysettled here largelyas colonists. Since I wrotethat paper I have met with otherevidence which had previouslyescaped me, and which all tendsto strengthenthe view thereput forth. Prosperof Tyre,who wrote a Chrolniclewhich reaches from A.D. 378 to 456, tells us expresslythat in the 18th year of Theodosius,i.e., in A.D.441, Britain,after suffering from many pre- vious attacks,submitted to theSaxons. " Brittaniaeusque ad hoc tempusvariis cladibus eventibusquelatae, in (litionemSaxonum rediguntur."("Mon. Hist. Britt.,"lxxxii) This is quite incon- sistentwith the usual date of the Conquestas given by the Anglo-SaxonChronicle and by Bede. Constantius,Bishop of Lyons,who flourishedduring the fifth century,and wrotea lifeof Saint Germanus,and miaybe accepted as a contemporarywitness, describes how his hero,on his visitto Britain,which took place, as we knowfrom Prosper of Aquitaine, in 429, led the Britons against the Picts and Saxons, in the famnousHallelujah victory. This also is many yearsbefore the, date generallyreceived for the invasion of Hengist and his people,and if the site of the battle is to be identified,as Ussher and othersargued, with Maes Garmon,near Mold,in Flintshire, thenthe Saxons werenot onlyin Britain,but had also penetrated into its veryrecesses. These two authorswere actuallycontemporaries of the facts theyrelate, and theirevidence is ofimmensely greater value than Bede or the compilationof the tenth century,which goes by the name ofthe Anglo-SaxonChronicle. I have shownhow many of the names in the latter narrative are formedout of naines of towns- but another fact in the recordmakes us see what an artificialand untrustworthy narrative it is. Lappenberg,with his usual acumen,was, I believe,the firstto draw attentionto this. He says the es ents ip the Saga of the Aescings, or foundersof the Kingdom of Kelnt,take place in an eighttimes repeated cycle of eightyears, and adds, " If so manytraces of fctiondid not betraya poetic sourcefrom which these meagrechronicles derived their narra- tive,yet must those numbers awaken suspicion,"etc. (Op. cit.77.) Thlusin 449, Yortigerninvites the Angolesto Britain. In This content downloaded from 185.2.32.49 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:33:07 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 176 H. H. HOWORTH.-Tlhe,Ethnology of Germnany. 457 the Britons foughtagainst the invadersat Crecganford.In 465 Hengist and Aesc foughtwith the Welsh at Ebbsfleet. In 473 theyagain defeatedthe Welsh. In 488, 40 years after his arrival,i.e., fivetimes 8 years, Hengist died. Aesc then reigned 24 years,i.e., three times 8. (Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, passirn). From this point, for 80 years, we hear nothing of Kent, save of the successionof the threekings, " Octa or Ocha, the son of Eric or' ALsc, Eormenric and Aithelbert,who is named in 568; he reigned48 years,and his successors,Ead- bald and Earconbehrt,each 24." (Lappenberg,75.) Similarly,AElla is said to have landed in 477, and to have foughtwith the Welsh in 485. Such artificialnumbers show how purelyconventional the chronologyis. But it is morethan conventional,it is inconsistentwith itself. Thus, Bede gives us both the year 449 and 459 as the beginningof the joint reigns of Marcian and Valentinian,the formerin his Historyand the latterin his Chronicon,the rightyear being 450; and yet thisis the crucial date of his chronology,for he tells us the Saxons landed duringtheir reign. If it was duringtheir reign, as he asserts,and as the Chronicle,following him, also asserts,it Vwas clearlyneither in 448 nor 449, butin 450, or one ofthe sevensuc- ceeding years. But the factis, that the date 448 is a purely artificialone. As Mr. Skene has argued,it is foundedon an erroneousconstruction of a passage in Gildas (who apparently puts the arrivalof the Saxons afterthe third consulship of Aetius, whichwas in 446), and a manipulationof the story of Constantius, aboutthe Hallelujah victoryover the Saxons,which Bede under- standsas of the second visit of Germanus,while Constantius clearlyrefers it to thefirst. This date of Bede's is thereforeof no value, and it is the cardinaldate upon whichthe artificialchro- nologyof the Anglo-SaxonChronicle has been based. Now, in the " HistoriaBritonum," which in its earliestshape was probably not later than Bede, but, as I believe, earlier, we have three differentdates for the arrival of the Saxons, the latestof whichis 428. This date occursonly in the Harleian MS., which was writtenin 954. There we are told that Vortigernbegan to reign in the joint consulship of Theodo- sius and Valentinian, i.e., in 425. Four years afterthis, and in the consulshipof Felix and Taurus,i.e., in 428, theSaxons first arrived. This date seems to me to be clearlydeduced from Con- stantius,and to coincidewith that of theHallelujah victory,and the firstmission of St. Germanus,nor does it occurin the other copies of the Historia Britonum. The next date is apparently based on Britishtraditions. In this we are told that fromnthe firstyear of the arrivalof the Saxons to the fourthyear of King MIerviniwas 429 years. This eintryis as old as theedition of the This content downloaded from 185.2.32.49 on Mon, 16 Jun 2014 18:33:07 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions HI. H. HOWORTH.-The Ethnologyof Germany. 177 HistoriaBritonum," published in 821,which was thefourth year of King Mervin,and thus puts the Saxon invasionin 392,which as Mr. Skene,to whomI owe a great deal of my matteras to these dates,says, corresponds well withthe oldestWelsh chrono- logical tables,and that preservedin the Red Book of Hergest,a MS. of the thirteenthcentury, which says that fromthe reignof Vortigernto thebattle of Badon was 128 years.
Recommended publications
  • This Site © 2000, Dustin Evermore. to Navigate This Site, Click the Section
    A Fuzion Fantasy role playing game by Dustin Evermore This site © 2000, Dustin Evermore. To navigate this site, click the section you want from the left frame, then select the chapter from the right frame. http://www.actionstudios.com/dol/index.html [4/4/2001 9:35:38 AM] History Religion Druids Saxon Religion Life in Britain The Otherworld http://www.actionstudios.com/dol/settingframe.html [4/4/2001 9:35:40 AM] HISTORY The history of the lands of Dawn of Legends is quite similar to the history of these lands of our world. However, there are some rather critical differences. The following outlines these. Ancient Times In the centuries B.C.E. (Before Common Era), the Celtic peoples populated much of Europe. Although the ancient Celts varied in description, they had a reasonably similar culture. The religion of the Celts in particular helped to unify tradition. The ancient druidic faith held the sum of all the Celt people’s knowledge and laws. The ancient druids generally maintained a neutrality in politics and gained impartiality in as judges of important social matters among the Celtic peoples. It has been said that a druid could stop a battle between warring tribes in these ancient times simply by walking between the armies. None challenged the authority and power of the druids. Coming of the Romans Boudicea, A Bard’s Tale The Romans line every hill, The conquests of Julius Ceasar targeted the druids as the nerve center and unifying force of Spears bright and deadly still, Blood red with silver shields, the Gallic Celts.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Were the Anglo-Saxons? Part of History Anglo-Saxons the Last Roman Soldiers Left Britain in 410
    Who were the Anglo-Saxons? Part of History Anglo-Saxons The last Roman soldiers left Britain in 410. New people came in ships across the North Sea – the Anglo-Saxons. The Anglo-Saxon age in Britain was from around AD410 to 1066. They were a mix of tribes from Germany, Denmark and the Netherlands. The three biggest were the Angles, the Saxons and the Jutes. The land they settled in was 'Angle-land', or England. If we use the modern names for the countries they came from, the Saxons were German-Dutch, the Angles were southern Danish, and the Jutes were northern Danish. Growing up in an Anglo-Saxon village Anglo-Saxon children had to grow up quickly. By the time they were ten, they were seen as an adult. This wasn't always a good thing. They had to work as hard as any adult and would be punished as adults, if they stole or broke the law. Girls worked in the home. They were in charge of housekeeping, weaving cloth, cooking meals, making cheese and brewing ale. Boys learned the skills of their fathers. They learned to chop down trees with an axe, how to plough a field and how to use a spear in battle. They also fished and went hunting with other men from the village. Only a few girls and boys learned to read and write. The sons of kings or wealthy families might be taught at home by a private teacher. The only schools were run by the Christian church, in monasteries. Some children lived there to train as monks and nuns.
    [Show full text]
  • Nennius' Historia Brittonum
    Nennius’ ‘Historia Brittonum’ Translated by Rev. W. Gunn & J. A. Giles For convenience, this text has been assembled and composed into this PDF document by Camelot On-line. Please visit us on-line at: http://www.heroofcamelot.com/ The Historia Brittonum Table of Contents Acknowledgements....................................................................................................................................4 Preface........................................................................................................................................................5 I. THE PROLOGUE..................................................................................................................................6 1.............................................................................................................................................................6 2.............................................................................................................................................................7 II. THE APOLOGY OF NENNIUS...........................................................................................................7 3.............................................................................................................................................................7 III. THE HISTORY ...................................................................................................................................8 4,5..........................................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Matter of Britain
    THE MATTER OF BRITAIN: KING ARTHUR'S BATTLES I had rather myself be the historian of the Britons than nobody, although so many are to be found who might much more satisfactorily discharge the labour thus imposed on me; I humbly entreat my readers, whose ears I may offend by the inelegance of my words, that they will fulfil the wish of my seniors, and grant me the easy task of listening with candour to my history May, therefore, candour be shown where the inelegance of my words is insufficient, and may the truth of this history, which my rustic tongue has ventured, as a kind of plough, to trace out in furrows, lose none of its influence from that cause, in the ears of my hearers. For it is better to drink a wholesome draught of truth from a humble vessel, than poison mixed with honey from a golden goblet Nennius CONTENTS Chapter Introduction 1 The Kinship of the King 2 Arthur’s Battles 3 The River Glein 4 The River Dubglas 5 Bassas 6 Guinnion 7 Caledonian Wood 8 Loch Lomond 9 Portrush 10 Cwm Kerwyn 11 Caer Legion 12 Tribuit 13 Mount Agned 14 Mount Badon 15 Camlann Epilogue Appendices A Uther Pendragon B Arthwys, King of the Pennines C Arthur’s Pilgrimages D King Arthur’s Bones INTRODUCTION Cupbearer, fill these eager mead-horns, for I have a song to sing. Let us plunge helmet first into the Dark Ages, as the candle of Roman civilisation goes out over Europe, as an empire finally fell. The Britons, placid citizens after centuries of the Pax Romana, are suddenly assaulted on three sides; from the west the Irish, from the north the Picts & from across the North Sea the Anglo-Saxons.
    [Show full text]
  • Violence, Christianity, and the Anglo-Saxon Charms Laurajan G
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1-1-2011 Violence, Christianity, And The Anglo-Saxon Charms Laurajan G. Gallardo Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in English at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Gallardo, Laurajan G., "Violence, Christianity, And The Anglo-Saxon Charms" (2011). Masters Theses. 293. http://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/293 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. *****US Copyright Notice***** No further reproduction or distribution of this copy is permitted by electronic transmission or any other means. The user should review the copyright notice on the following scanned image(s) contained in the original work from which this electronic copy was made. Section 108: United States Copyright Law The copyright law of the United States [Title 17, United States Code] governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted materials. Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that the reproduction is not to be used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research. If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of "fair use," that use may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HISTORY of the KINGS of BRITAIN by GEOFFREY of MONMOUTH Edited and Translated by J.A
    THE HISTORY OF THE KINGS OF BRITAIN by GEOFFREY OF MONMOUTH Edited and Translated by J.A. Giles, D.C.L. BOOK VI. CHAP. I.--Gratian, being advanced to the throne, is killed by the common people. The Britons desire the Romans to defend them against Guanius and Melga. But Gratian Municeps, hearing of the death of Maximian, seized the crown, and made himself king. After this he exercised such tyranny that the common people fell upon him in a tumultuous manner, and murdered him. When this news reached other countries, their former enemies returned back from Ireland, and bringing with them the Scots, Norwegians, and Dacians, made dreadful devastations with fire and sword over the whole kingdom, from sea to sea. Upon this most grievous calamity and oppression, ambassadors are despatched with letters to Rome, to beseech, with tears and vows of perpetual subjection, that a body of men might be sent to revenge their injuries, and drive out the enemy from them. The ambassadors in a short time prevailed so far, that, unmindful of past injuries, the Romans granted them one legion, which was transported in a fleet to their country, and there speedily encountered the enemy. At last, after the slaughter of a vast multitude of them, they drove them entirely out of the country, and rescued the miserable people from their outrageous cruelty. Then they gave orders for a wall to be built between Albania and Deira, from one sea to the other, for a terror to the enemy, and safeguard to the country. At that time Albania was wholly laid to waste, by the frequent invasions of barbarous nations; and whatever enemies made an attempt upon the country, met with a convenient landing-place there.
    [Show full text]
  • When Did the Anglo-Saxons Invade Britain?
    History When did the Anglo-Saxons invade Britain? Grammarsaurus www.grammarsaurus.co.uk 11 Anglo-Saxon Invasion In the year 350, the Anglo-Saxons tried to invade Britain. At this time, the Romans ruled Britain. The Anglo-Saxons raided the south and east shores of England. The Romans were not happy and fought back. The Anglo Saxons retreated and left. www.grammarsaurus.co.uk 21 Anglo-Saxon Invasion Around the year 410, the last Roman soldiers left Britain. They had not trained the British to defend themselves therefore Britain no longer had a strong army to defend it from the invaders. There were many battles between Anglo-Saxons and Britons and the Anglo-Saxons succeeded. More and more Anglo-Saxons arrived to take land for themselves. It is for this reason that the time of the Anglo-Saxons is usually thought of as beginning about AD 450. Georgians Pre-History Iron Age Romans Vikings Tudors Modern 43 410 790 1603 1837 1901 1714 1066 1485 AD c.700 BC c.AD c.AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD AD Anglo-Saxons Medieval Stuarts Victorians www.grammarsaurus.co.uk 31 Who were the Anglo-Saxons? The Anglo-Saxons were made up of three groups of people from Germany, Denmark and The Netherlands. The groups were named the Angles, the Saxons, and the Jutes. The Angles and the Saxon tribes were the largest of the three attacking tribes and so we often know them as Anglo-Saxons. They all shared the same language but were each ruled by different strong warriors.
    [Show full text]
  • Ogma's Tale: the Dagda and the Morrigan at the River Unius
    Ogma’s Tale: The Dagda and the Morrigan at the River Unius Presented to Whispering Lake Grove for Samhain, October 30, 2016 by Nathan Large A tale you’ve asked, and a tale you shall have, of the Dagda and his envoy to the Morrigan. I’ve been tasked with the telling: lore-keeper of the Tuatha de Danann, champion to two kings, brother to the Good God, and as tied up in the tale as any… Ogma am I, this Samhain night. It was on a day just before Samhain that my brother and the dark queen met, he on his duties to our king, Nuada, and Lugh his battle master (and our half-brother besides). But before I come to that, let me set the stage. The Fomorians were a torment upon Eireann and a misery to we Tuatha, despite our past victory over the Fir Bolg. Though we gained three-quarters of Eireann at that first battle of Maige Tuireadh, we did not cast off the Fomor who oppressed the land. Worse, we also lost our king, Nuada, when the loss of his hand disqualified him from ruling. Instead, we accepted the rule of the half-Fomorian king, Bres, through whom the Fomorians exerted their control. Bres ruined the court of the Tuatha, stilling its songs, emptying its tables, and banning all competitions of skill. None of the court could perform their duties. I alone was permitted to serve, and that only to haul firewood for the hearth at Tara. Our first rejection of the Fomor was to unseat Bres, once Nuada was whole again, his hand restored.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ireland's Four Cycles of Myth and Legend Irish Mythology Has Been
    Ireland's Four Cycles of Myth and Legend u u Irish mythology has been classified or taxonomized into four cycles (collections, sets) • From the oldest tales to the most recent, they are: the Mythological Cycle; the Ulster (or Red Branch) Cycle; the Fenian (or Ossianic) Cycle; and the Historical (or Kings') Cycle u u The Mythological Cycle is dominated by origin myths called pseudohistories • These tales narrate a series of foreign invasions of Ireland, with each new wave of invader-settlers marginalizing the formerly dominant group u The oldest group, the Fomorians, resemble the Greek Titans: semi-divine beings associated with the chaos that preceded the civilizing gods u The penultimate aggressor group, the Tuatha Dé Danann (people of the goddess Danu), suffered defeat at the hands of the Milesians or Gaels, who entered Ireland from northern Spain • Legendarily, some surviving members of the Tuatha Dé Danann became the fairies or "little people," occupying aerial or subterranean (underground) zones on the island of Ireland but with a different temporality • The Irish author C.S. Lewis uses this idea in his Narnia series, where the portal into Narnia—a place outside "regular' time—is a wardrobe u Might the Milesians have, in fact, come from Spain? • A March 2000 article in the esteemed science journal Nature revealed that 98% of Connacht (west-of-Ireland) men and 89% of Basque (northeast-of- Spain) men carry the ancestral (or hunter-gatherer) European DNA signature, which passes from father to son • By contrast with the high Irish and
    [Show full text]
  • A Spot Called Crayford the Legend of Hengest
    A Spot Called Crayford The Legend of Hengest KS2 Pupil Response PACK By Peter Daniel and Kate Morton Illustrations by Michael Foreman 1 This WorkBook Belongs TO: Write your name and class here: ___________________________ Write your name below in Anglo Saxon Runes: 2 Name: ....................................................... Date: ....................... Below is the Anglo-Saxon alphabet. Write your name above in runes. Can you spell my name out in the ancient Saxon alphabet? Hengest H E N G E S T Don’t leave me out of this. We’re brothers and do every- thing together! Horsa H O R S A 3 A Letter of Apology from Honorius Gildas tells us that after the Romans left Britannia, barbarians invaded Britain and the people appealed for help to a Roman general called Flavius Aetius: The barbarians push us back to the sea, the sea pushes us back to the barbarians; between these two we are either drowned or slaughtered.” the Groans of the Britons’ Gildas Honorius, the Western Roman Emperor (393-423AD) sent The Rescript of Honorius 411AD a letter of apology telling the Britons that they must 'look to their own defences'. Thus ending Rome’s ties with Britain. Imagine you are Emperor Honorius to write a letter of apology to the Britons. Use the map above to • Let the Britons know you know who their enemies are Honorius was Western • Can you explain why the Emperor is in no position to help? Roman Emperor • Use the letter template to draft your letter 4 ‘A Letter of apology from Honorius’ Ravenna Itialy 411AD Dear Britons Tell the Britons that you know who is attacking them.
    [Show full text]
  • History Year 5 a United Kingdom
    Christ with me as I learn, grow and shine History Year 5 A United Kingdom Key Vocabulary Reading around the topic Sticky Knowledge Christ with me as I learn, grow and shine Word Definition ▪ The Anglo Saxons settled in England and never BIG ? Angles Germanic invading tribe, they went home but developed their own The decisive shift to founded several kingdoms of communities which form the basis of many (from Paganism) England and their name is the root villages today. Christianity occurred in of the word England. They settled ▪ For a long time, England was not one country, 655CE when King Penda mainly in East Anglia. Anglo-Saxon kings ruled lots of small kingdoms was slain in the Battle of Anglo-Saxon During their time in Britain the kingdoms Anglo-Saxons formed many across the land. the Winwaed and Mercia kingdoms. ▪ The Anglo-Saxons were fierce people who became officially fought many battles, including fighting each Christian for the first Churl A lower-class Anglo-Saxon but better than a slave. other. time. Jutes One of the three most powerful Key Learning ▪ The Anglo-Saxons were made up of three Germanic peoples of their time in Chronology tribes: the Angles; Saxons; and, Jutes. Visits/ Visitors the Nordic Iron Age, the other two Sequence events through the use of ▪ Sutton Hoo is the site in Suffolk of a Saxon ship Visitor comes in and being the Saxons and Angles. They appropriate terms relating to the passing of time and identify where these events fit into a burial of the 7th century ad, containing does an Anglo-Saxon settled mainly in Kent.
    [Show full text]
  • Hengest Ward
    http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society HENGEST By GORDON WARD, M.D., F.S.A. 1. UNWRrITEN HISTORY WHEN Hengest was alive, in what some people call the Heroic Age and others the Dark Ages, there was no thought of committing history to writing. It is true that a form of writing existed. A few wise men knew the Runic alphabet, but to most people it was a form of magic and in any case it was quite unsuitable for the common folk. The chieftains lived in great wooden halls, rather like the barns of to-day, and their retainers and servants lived around them. In these halls history was handed down by word of mouth. All the most important people were expected to be able to play the harp and to improvise alliterative poetry in honour of the giver of the feast, or in order to record their adventures. There were also minstrels particularly skilled in this form of entertainment, and these learnt all the famous deeds of their master and his house, and sang them to his guests as occasion required. In such a manner was the history of Hengest handed down for five hundred years or more before it was committed to writing or, at least, before it assumed the form that we find in the only manuscript we have left. Although we have also two small saga fragments, which we must presently notice, only one saga of the Heroic Age has come down to us complete.
    [Show full text]