DOCSLIB.ORG

Port of Seattle Commissioners PO Box 1209 Seattle, WA 98111 Dear Commissioners Albro, Bowman, Bryant, Creighton and Gregoire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port of Seattle Commissioners PO Box 1209 Seattle, WA 98111 Dear Commissioners Albro, Bowman, Bryant, Creighton and Gregoire Port of Seattle Commissioners P.O. Box 1209 Seattle, WA 98111 Dear Commissioners Albro, Bowman, Bryant, Creighton and Gregoire, As elected officials, business owners, community leaders, and Alaskan residents, the undersigned groups represent a wide swath of the state of Alaska. We understand firsthand that Alaskan energy, and oil and gas in particular, is critical to the well-being of every Alaskan resident and business. It contributes ~90% of state revenue, represents 1/3 of Alaskan jobs, and constitutes roughly half of the state’s economy. Simply put, the health of Alaska is intricately tied to development of the state’s energy resources. It should therefore be no surprise that Alaskans overwhelmingly support energy development, including offshore in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas, which is home to an estimated 23.6 billion barrels of oil, enough to provide every licensed driver in the West Coast states with nearly 14,000 gallons of gasoline. Beyond Alaska and the West Coast region, in addition to fueling cars and trucks, this resource helps feed, clothe, and house hundreds of millions of Americans all across the nation. It is thus also not surprising that, as reflected in recent public polling, Americans in states as far away as New Hampshire, South Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana, and Iowa strongly support development of Alaskan energy resources. Indeed, as a federal advisory committee comprised of industry, academic, NGO, and government representatives recently concluded in a report requested by U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, new development of Alaskan energy in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas must begin ramping up now to ensure the nation’s long-term energy security. Importantly, Alaska is committed to working with the federal government, the energy industry, and others to ensure that innovation drives environmental improvement and energy development. However, those who present a false choice between energy development and a healthy environment and simply seek to prohibit the ability to access our resources present a position that is as ill-founded as it is unwise. If acted on, such a stance threatens to drive up energy prices for all Americans, negatively impacting jobs and slowing our economy. An 11th-hour effort organized by those opposed to Alaskan offshore development is now underway to force the revocation of the terms of the Port of Seattle’s Terminal 5 lease with Foss Maritime. The signed lease provides a staging area for exploration equipment over the next two to four years. With the opportunity associated with the 2015 exploration season just around the corner, and with the country still dependent on foreign energy imports, Alaskans and citizens across the United States deserve far better than to be held hostage by extremists’ viewpoints in the state of Washington. Significantly, the situation at hand is about far more than just energy, with the Port of Seattle having played a critical role in closely linking the economies of Alaska and Washington State. In that regard, many other economic powerhouse sectors in the Alaska region that depend on operational certainty and predictability in the Pacific Northwest, such as the tourism and seafood industries, are also closely monitoring the ongoing developments and wondering whether their activities at the port might be next on the target list if anti-development groups are successful in this instance. We are thus at a critical juncture with regard to both U.S. Arctic exploration and the future state of economic ties between Alaska and the Seattle area. The response of elected and public officials at all levels, including state and local, will play a crucial role in determining whether Alaska, the Seattle region, and the nation at large are able to realize the benefits associated with our abundant energy resources and historically close ties between Alaska and the Puget Sound region. For the benefit of this and future generations, it is our sincere hope that officials in Washington State respond with leadership and reason. To that end, we thank you for your recent vote in support of Foss’ use of Terminal 5 and encourage your continued support in honoring the terms of the lease agreement. cc: Governor Jay Inslee Washington State House Leadership Washington State Senate Leadership Speaker Frank Chopp Lt. Governor Brad Owen, Senate President Speaker Pro Tempore Rep. Jim Moeller Senator Pam Roach, President Pro Tempore Deputy Speaker Pro Tempore Rep. Tina Orwall Sen. Sharon Brown, Vice President Pro Tempore Majority Leader Rep. Pat Sullivan Hunter G. Goodman, Secretary of the Senate Majority Caucus Chair Rep. Eric Pettigrew Pablo G. (Paul) Campos, Dep. Senate Secretary Majority Whip Rep. Kevin Van De Wege Majority Leader Mark Schoesler Deputy Majority Whip Rep. Marcus Riccelli Majority Caucus Chair Linda Evans Parlette Deputy Majority Whip Rep. Cindy Ryu Majority Floor Leader Joe Fain Majority Floor Leader Rep. Kristine Lytton Majority Whip Ann Rivers Deputy Majority Leader Rep. Larry Springer Majority Caucus Deputy Leader John Braun Deputy Majority Floor Leader Rep. Steve Bergquist Majority Caucus Vice Chair Jan Angel Deputy Majority Floor Leader Rep. Gael Tarleton Majority Assistant Floor Leader Jim Honeyford Assistant Majority Whip Rep. Joan McBride Majority Assistant Whip Mark Miloscia Minority Leader Rep. Dan Kristiansen Democratic Leader Sharon Nelson Deputy Minority Leader Rep. Joel Kretz Democratic Caucus Chair Karen Fraser Minority Caucus Chair Rep. Shelly Short Democratic Caucus Vice Chair Rosemary McAuliffe Minority Whip Rep. Paul Harris Democratic Deputy Leader Andy Billig Minority Floor Leader Rep. J. T. Wilcox Democratic Floor Leader Christine Rolfes Minority Caucus Vice Chair Rep. Joe Schmick Democratic Asst. Floor Leader Annette Cleveland Assistant Minority Floor Leader Rep. Matt Shea Democratic Whip Cyrus Habib Assistant Minority Floor Leader Rep. Matt Manweller Democratic Assistant Whip Mark Mullet Assistant Minority Whip Rep. Dan Griffey Assistant Minority Whip Rep. Dave Hayes Assistant Minority Whip Rep. Lynda Wilson .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • June 15, 2021 Meeting Minutes
    LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR SENATORS REPRESENTATIVES State of Washington Keenan Konopaski Bob Hasegawa Jake Fey Joint Legislative 106 11th Ave SW, PO Box 40910 Liz Lovelett Noel Frame Olympia, WA 98504-0910 Mark Mullet, Chair Larry Hoff Audit & Review Ann Rivers Vicki Kraft Phone: 360-786-5171 Rebecca Saldaña Ed Orcutt, Vice Chair Committee Fax: 360-786-5180 Shelly Short Gerry Pollet, Assistant Secretary E-mail: [email protected] Keith Wagoner Drew Stokesbary JLARC Twitter: @WALegAuditor Lynda Wilson, Secretary Website: www.jlarc.leg.wa.gov June 15, 2021 Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee Regular Committee Meeting Minutes COMMITTEE BUSINESS TVW Recording • Senator Mullet, JLARC Chair, called the meeting to order at 10:00 a.m. • Senator Mullet, JLARC Chair, introduced JLARC’s new member, Senator Liz Lovelett. Senator Mullet, JLARC Chair, made a motion to approve the minutes from the January 6, 2021 JLARC meeting. Motion was seconded and approved. (See TVW recording at 01:17) • Keenan Konopaski, Legislative Auditor and Eric Thomas, Audit Coordinator, spoke about the Legislative Auditor’s Annual Report that was released earlier this year. • Keenan Konopaski, Legislative Auditor; Valerie Whitener, Deputy Legislative Auditor; and Eric Thomas; Audit Coordinator, spoke about the 2021-23 Work Plan. Senator Mullet, JLARC Chair, made a motion to approve the 2021-23 Work Plan. Motion was seconded and approved. (See TVW recording at 09:23) REPORTS, PRESENTATIONS, DISCUSSIONS TVW Recording Follow-Up on Workers’ Compensation Claim Management for State Funded Claims – Proposed Final Report Legislative Auditor’s Conclusion: Although L&I took steps to improve processes for state funded workers’ compensation claims, the 2016 recommendations remain partially implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Filing Term of Office Incumbent Salary Fee Office
    FEDERAL OFFICES (File with state) ANNUAL FILING TERM OF OFFICE INCUMBENT SALARY FEE OFFICE President Barack Obama - $0 4-year Term, Partisan U.S. Senator Patty Murray $174,000 $1740.00 6-year Term, Partisan CONGRESSIONAL OFFICES (File with state) ANNUAL FILING TERM OF OFFICE INCUMBENT SALARY FEE OFFICE Congressional Dist. 3 U.S. Representative Jaime Herrera Beutler $174,000 $1740.00 2-year Term, Partisan WASHINGTON STATE OFFICES (File with state) ANNUAL FILING TERM OF OFFICE INCUMBENT SALARY FEE OFFICE Governor Jay Inslee $171,898 $1718.98 4-year Term, Partisan Lt. Governor Brad Owen $100,880 $1008.80 4-year Term, Partisan Secretary of State Kim Wyman $120,459 $1204.59 4-year Term, Partisan State Treasurer Jim McIntire $133,750 $1337.50 4-year Term, Partisan State Auditor Troy Kelley $120,459 $1204.59 4-year Term, Partisan Attorney General Bob Ferguson $156,270 $1562.70 4-year Term, Partisan Commissioner of Public Lands Peter J. Goldmark $130,253 $1302.53 4-year Term, Partisan Superintendent of Public Instruction Randy I. Dorn $132,883 $1328.83 4-year Term, Partisan Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler $121,628 $1216.28 4-year Term, Partisan 14th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OFFICES (File with state) ANNUAL FILING TERM OF OFFICE INCUMBENT SALARY FEE OFFICE State Senator Curtis King $45,474 $454.74 4-year Term, Partisan State Rep., Position 1 Norm Johnson $45,474 $454.74 2-year Term, Partisan State Rep., Position 2 Gina R. McCabe $45,474 $454.74 2-year Term, Partisan 17th LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OFFICES (File with Clark County Auditor) ANNUAL FILING
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Corporate Political Contributions H1 2018
    Microsoft Corporation Tel 425 882 8080 One Microsoft Way Fax 425 936 7329 Redmond, WA 98052-6399 http://www.microsoft.com Microsoft Corporate Political Contributions January 1, 2018 – June 30, 2018 NAME STATE AMOUNT Anna Wishart for Legislature NE $250 Anthony Rendon for Assembly 2018 CA $4,400 Bolz for Legislature NE $250 Bruce Chandler Campaign WA $1,000 California Republican Party - Nonfederal Account CA $15,000 Campaign to Elect Paul Harris WA $500 Citizens for Kevin Ranker WA $1,000 Committee to Elect Brandon Vick WA $1,000 Committee to Elect Cary Condotta WA $1,000 Committee to Elect Doug Ericksen WA $1,000 Committee to Elect Drew Hansen WA $1,000 Committee to Elect Gina McCabe WA $500 Committee to Elect Jake Fey WA $1,000 Committee to Elect Joel Kretz WA $500 Committee to Elect John Lovick WA $500 Committee to Elect Matt Shea WA $500 Committee To Elect Steve Hobbs WA $1,000 Committee to Elect Tim Sheldon WA $1,000 Committee to Re-Elect Brian Blake WA $500 Committee to Re-Elect Ed Orcutt WA $500 Curt Friesen for Legislature NE $500 Curtis King for Senate WA $1,000 Doug Peterson for Attorney General NE $1,500 Ebke for Legislature NE $250 Friends for Adam Morfeld NE $500 Friends for Ann Rivers WA $1,000 Friends of Andrew Barkis WA $1,000 Friends of Andy Billig WA $1,000 Friends of Chris Sununu NH $2,000 Friends of Dan Watermeier NE $500 Friends of Derek Stanford WA $1,000 Friends of Dow Constantine WA $2,000 Friends of Drew Stokesbary WA $1,000 Friends of Frank Chopp WA $1,000 Friends of Gael WA $1,000 Friends of Guy Palumbo WA $1,000
    [Show full text]
  • Doe V. Reed and the History of Anonymous Speech Abstract
    Document1 5/17/2011 5:58 PM Chesa Boudin Publius and the Petition: Doe v. Reed and the History of Anonymous Speech abstract. This Note argues that signatures on petitions intended for use in direct democracy processes such as ballot initiatives should be subject to public scrutiny and disclosure. They should not benefit from free speech protections allowing for anonymity. Signatures used in these proceedings should not be considered petitions or speech at all, but rather lawmaking. Through historical, doctrinal, and prudential analysis, this Note distinguishes between core First Amendment rights, which might include signatures on a general petition with no legislative implications or minority associational rights, and speech-like activity that forms part of the regulated lawmaking process. author. Yale Law School, J.D. expected 2011; University of Oxford, M.Sc. 2006, 2004; Yale College, B.A. 2003. Special thanks to Professor Akhil Amar for his guidance and feedback throughout the research and writing of this Note. I am grateful to Cyrus Habib, whose work in, and familiarity with, this area of the law first exposed me to this research topic. Thanks also to Caitlin O’Brien and the rest of the editorial staff at The Yale Law Journal . 2140 publius and the petition note contents introduction 2142 i. doe v. reed: anonymous speech versus lawmaking in practice 2145 ii. the history of anonymous speech 2150 A. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Speech 2152 B. Historical Practice: Public Politics and Disclosure 2157 iii. anonymous speech and disclosure doctrine 2164 A. Anonymous Speech Doctrine: Talley and McIntyre 2164 B. Disclosure Doctrine 2169 iv.
    [Show full text]
  • CYRUS HABIB "Nothing Was Impossible" by Bob Young Cyrus Habib "Nothing Was Impossible"
    CYRUS HABIB "Nothing Was Impossible" By Bob Young Cyrus Habib "Nothing Was Impossible" oing into junior high school, Kamyar Habib flirted with reinventing himself. It wouldn’t be the last time. He was a blind, cancer-surviving Iranian Amer- ican living in a Seattle suburb. And he was tired of kids making fun of his Gname by calling him “Caviar.” “You’re right, I’m a delicacy,” he’d snap back. Armored wit had become his first line of defense. He didn’t have a middle name, so he gave himself one, after a daring leader of ancient Persia, Cyrus the Great. He went by “K.C.” which added a hint of hipness to a bookish teenager who played jazz piano. By the time he got to New York City and Columbia University at 18, he was fully “Cyrus.” Debonair in designer clothes and sunglasses, he became a published photographer. “In New York you can be a new man,” Habib says, quoting the musi- cal “Hamilton.” He won a scholarship to Oxford, the oldest university in the English-speaking world, and aspired to be a literature professor. Then, he took a hard turn from aca- demia’s abstractions toward the corridors of power. He opted to become an attorney and headed to Yale, where he edited the law journal, while working, in his spare time, for Google in London and Goldman Sachs on Wall Street. In 2012, Habib veered into politics, after sizing up the current crop of office holders, and concluding, I can do that. Just four years later, he became Washington’s lieutenant governor, and the first Iranian American elected to a statewide office in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Publius and the Petition: Doe V
    THE YALE LAW JOURNAL CHESA BOUDIN Publius and the Petition: Doe v. Reed and the History of Anonymous Speech ABSTRACT. This Note argues that signatures on petitions intended for use in direct democracy processes such as ballot initiatives should be subject to public scrutiny and disclosure. They should not benefit from free speech protections allowing for anonymity. Signatures used in these proceedings should not be considered petitions or speech at all, but rather lawmaking. Through historical, doctrinal, and prudential analysis, this Note distinguishes between core First Amendment rights, which might include signatures on a general petition with no legislative implications or minority associational rights, and speech-like activity that forms part of the regulated lawmaking process. AUTHOR. Yale Law School, J.D. expected 2011; University of Oxford, M.Sc. 2oo6, 2004; Yale College, B.A. 2003. Special thanks to Professor Akhil Amar for his guidance and feedback throughout the research and writing of this Note. I am grateful to Cyrus Habib, whose work in, and familiarity with, this area of the law first exposed me to this research topic. Thanks also to Caitlin O'Brien and the rest of the editorial staff at The Yale Law Journal. 2140 NOTE CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 2142 1. DOE V. REED: ANONYMOUS SPEECH VERSUS LAWMAKING IN PRACTICE 2145 II. THE HISTORY OF ANONYMOUS SPEECH 2150 A. Anonymous and Pseudonymous Speech 2152 B. Historical Practice: Public Politics and Disclosure 2157 III.ANONYMOUS SPEECH AND DISCLOSURE DOCTRINE 2164 A. Anonymous Speech Doctrine: Talley and McIntyre 2164 B. Disclosure Doctrine 2169 IV. PRUDENTIAL CONSIDERATIONS 2175 A. State Regulation Can Promote Transparency and Deter Fraud 2176 B.
    [Show full text]
  • WASHINGTON STATE SENATE 2018 Legislative Scorecard Environment
    Environment Washington WASHINGTON STATE SENATE 2018 Legislative Scorecard Environment Washington is a citizen advocacy group that combines independent research, practical ideas and tough-minded advocacy to Senator Energy Efficient Banning Invasive Healthy Food Oil Transportation Toxic Chemicals in Orca Protection Act Nonnative Fish overcome the opposition of powerful special Party District 1. Buildings 2. Atlantic Salmon 3. Packaging 4. Safety 5. Firefighting Foam 6. 9. 2018 Score interests and win real results for Washington’s Jan Angel R 26 - + - + + - + 57% environment. We have compiled this legislative Barbara Bailey R 10 - - - + - - + 29% scorecard as a tool to educate Washington citizens Michael Baumgartner R 6 - - - + E - + 43% Randi Becker R 2 - - - + - - - 14% about the voting records of their elected officials. Andy Billig D 3 + + + + + + + 100% John Braun R 20 - - + + + + - 57% Sharon Brown R 8 - - - - + - - 14% Votes in this Scorecard Reuven Carlyle D 36 + A + + + + + 100% Of the thousands of bills voted on in the Washington Maralyn Chase D 32 + + + + + + + 100% House and Senate, we identified a few key votes Annette Cleveland D 49 + + + + + + + 100% that will have the greatest impact on Washington’s Steve Conway D 29 + + + + + + + 100% environment and public health. Short descriptions Jeannie Darneille D 27 + + + + + + + 100% of each bill can be found on the reverse and more Manka Dhingra D 45 + + + + + + + 100% details are available on our website. Doug Ericksen R 42 - - - + - + + 43% Joe Fain R 47 + + + + + + + 100% www.EnvironmentWashington.org
    [Show full text]
  • MEMBER PHOTO MAP of LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS 66Th WASHINGTON STATE LEGISLATURE − 2019-20
    MEMBER PHOTO MAP OF LEGISLATIVE DISTRICTS th ASHINGTON TATE EGISLATURE 66 W S L − 2019-20 Barbara Bailey Norma Smith Dave Paul (R) (R) (D) Marko Liias Strom Peterson Lillian (D) (D) Or�z-Self (D) John McCoy June Robinson Mike Sells (D) (D) (D) Jesse Cindy Ryu Lauren Davis Salomon (D) (D) (D) Steve Hobbs John Lovick Jared Mead (D) (D) (D) Chris�ne Sherry Drew Hansen Rolfes Appleton (D) (D) (D) Guy Derek Stanford Shelley Kloba Palumbo (D) (D) (D) Manka Roger Larry Springer Javier Valdez Dhingra Goodman (D) David Frockt Gerry Pollet (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Doug Ericksen Luanne Sharon (R) Van Werven Shewmake (R) (D) Liz Lovele� Debra Lekanoff Jeff Morris Pa�y Kuderer Vandana Sla�er Amy Walen (D) (D) (D) Jamie Nicole Frank Chopp (D) (D) (D) Pedersen Macri (D) (D) (D) Shelly Short Jacquelin Joel Kretz (R) Maycumber (R) (R) Lisa Wellman Tana Senn My-Linh Thai (D) (D) (D) Reuven Noel Frame Gael Tarleton Keith Robert Carolyn Eslick Carlyle (D) (D) Wagoner Sutherland (R) Brad Hawkins Keith Goehner Mike Steele (D) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) Joe Nguyen Eileen Cody Joe Fitzgibbon (D) (D) (D) Rebecca Sharon Tomiko Eric Pe�grew Kevin Mike Steve Saldaña Santos (D) Van De Wege Chapman Tharinger Mike Padden Ma� Shea Bob McCaslin (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (R) (R) (R) Emily Randall Jesse Young Michelle (D) (R) Caldier (R) Mark Mullet Bill Ramos Lisa Callan Bob Hasegawa Zack Hudgins Steve Bergquist (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) (D) Andy Billig Marcus Riccelli Timm Ormsby (D) (D) (D) Karen Keiser Tina Orwall Mia Gregerson (D) (D) (D) Tim Sheldon Dan Griffey Drew MacEwen (D) (R) (R) Mona Das Debra Pat Sullivan (D) Entenman (D) Phil Fortunato Drew Morgan Irwin (D) (R) Stokesbary (R) (R) Jeff Holy Mike Volz Jenny Graham (R) (R) (R) Jeannie Laurie Jinkins Jake Fey Darneille (D) (D) (D) Sam Hunt Laurie Dolan Beth Doglio Mark Mary Dye Joe Schmick (D) (D) (D) Judy Warnick Tom Dent Alex Ybarra Schoesler (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) (R) Claire Wilson Mike Kris�ne (D) Pelliccio� Reeves Randi Becker Andrew Barkis J.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State 2015 Gas Tax Increase
    Washington Senate Bill (2015) Title of Bill: Senate Bill 5987 Purpose: A $16 billion, 16-year transportation plan, which included an 11.9 cents-per-gallon gas tax increase—gradually implemented beginning Aug. 1, 2015, and fully applied on July 1, 2016—and an increase in transportation-related fees, including those for overweight vehicles. The bill also permits Sound Transit residents to vote on a plan to increase taxes for an additional $15 billion in order to expand the region’s light rail system. Status of Amendment: Passed Washington Senate Bill 5987 (2015) Signed into law: July 15, 2015 Senate House FOR 37 54 AGAINST 7 44 History State Gas Tax Before SB 5987, drivers in Washington state paid a flat excise tax on gasoline of 37.5 cents-per-gallon. That amount was last set in 2005, when the state legislature approved a 9.5 cents-per-gallon state gas tax increase (phased in over four years). The package, including an increase in vehicle weight fees, was estimated to raise $8.5 billion over a 16-year period. Previous gas tax increases were implemented in 2003, 1991, and 1990. Gas Tax Distribution & Transportation Funding Sources Washington state’s highway and ferry system is funded through a combination of motor vehicle fuel taxes (23%); vehicle licenses, permits, and fees (12%); federal funds (26%); bonding (23%), and other sources such as tolling, ferry fares, and local funding (16%).i The transportation budget pays for “maintaining, preserving, and improving the highway system; operating ferries; motor vehicle registration; and enforcing traffic laws on the state highway system.” ii The state’s gas tax of 37.5 cents-per-gallon was constitutionally dedicated for ‘highway purposes’ in the 18th Amendment (November 1944).
    [Show full text]
  • General Election November3
    VOTERS’ PAMPHLET Washington State Elections & Cowlitz County General Election November 3 2020 2020 Official Publication Ballots mailed to voters by October 16 (800) 448-4881 | sos.wa.gov 2 A message from Assistant Secretary of State Mark Neary On behalf of the Office of the Secretary of State, I am pleased to present the 2020 General Election Voters’ Pamphlet. We offer this comprehensive guide as a reference to help you find information on the candidates and statewide measures that appear on your ballot. This general election gives you the opportunity to have a say in our government at the local, state, and national levels, and to choose who will serve as our nation’s next president. In order to have your voice heard, you must be registered to vote. Voter registration forms that are mailed or completed online must be received by October 26, and we encourage you to check your registration information today at VoteWA.gov. If you are reading this message after October 26 and you are not registered, have moved since the last time you voted, or did not receive a ballot, you can go to your local elections office or voting center during regular business hours through 8 p.m. on Election Day to register to vote and receive a ballot. Once you have completed your ballot, you can send it via U.S. mail — no postage needed — but remember, all ballots must be postmarked by November 3. A late postmark could disqualify your ballot. The USPS recommends that you mail a week before Election Day.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative District and Colleges
    LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT AND COLLEGES Legislative Legislators Colleges District 1st Sen. Derek Stanford (D) Cascadia College Rep. Davina Duerr (D) Edmonds College Rep. Shelley Kloba (D) Everett Community College Lake Washington Institute of Technology 2nd Sen. Jim McCune (R) Bates Technical College Rep. Andrew Barkis (R) Clover Park Technical College Rep. J.T. Wilcox (R) Pierce College Puyallup South Puget Sound Community College 3rd Sen. Andy Billig (D) Spokane Rep. Marcus Riccelli (D) Rep. Timm Ormsby (D) 4th Sen. Mike Padden (R) Spokane Rep. Bob McCaslin (R) Rep. Rob Chase (R) 5th Sen. Mark Mullet (D) Bellevue College Rep. Bill Ramos (D) Cascadia College Rep. Lisa Callan (D) Green River College Lake Washington Institute of Technology Renton Technical College 6th Sen. Jeff Holy (R) Spokane Rep. Mike Volz (R) Rep. Jenny Graham (R) 7th Sen. Shelly Short (R) Spokane Rep. Jacquelin Maycumber (R) Wenatchee Valley College Rep. Joel Kretz (R) 8th Sen. Sharon Brown (R) Columbia Basin College Rep. Brad Klippert (R) Rep. Matt Boehnke (R) 9th Sen. Mark Schoesler (R) Big Bend Community College Rep. Mary Dye (R) Columbia Basin College Rep. Joe Schmick (R) Spokane Walla Walla Community College Page 1 of 6 Jan. 26, 2021 LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT AND COLLEGES Legislative Legislators Colleges District 10th Sen. Ron Muzzall (R) Everett Community College Rep. Greg Gilday (R) Skagit Valley College Rep. Dave Paul (D) 11th Sen. Bob Hasegawa (D) Green River College Rep. David Hackney (D) Highline College Rep. Steve Bergquist (D) Lake Washington Institute of Technology Renton Technical College Seattle Colleges 12th Sen. Brad Hawkins (R) Big Bend Community College Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
    VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws.
    [Show full text]