Louisiana LNG JUL 28 2015 Report.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Louisiana LNG JUL 28 2015 Report.Pdf Submittal in Support of Natural Gas Act Section 3 and Section 7 Project No. 0308379 07/28/2015 Docket No. PF14-17-000 Draft Resource Report 1: Project Description Docket No. PF14-17-000 DRAFT Resource Report 1: General Project Description Summary of Filing Information – Minimum Requirements Resource Report Information Location 1. Provide a detailed description and location map of the project facilities. (§ Section 1.1.2 380.12(c)(1)) • Include all pipeline and aboveground facilities. • Include support areas for construction or operation. • Identify facilities to be abandoned. 2. Describe any non-jurisdictional facilities that would be built in association with Section the project.(§ 380.12(c)(2)) 1.8 • Include auxiliary facilities (See § 2.55(a)). • Describe the relationship to the jurisdictional facilities. • Include ownership, land requirements, gas consumption, megawatt size, construction status, and an update of the latest status of Federal, state, and local permits/approvals. • Include the length and diameter of any interconnecting pipeline. • Apply the four-factor test to each facility (see § 380.12(c)(2)(ii)). 3. Provide current original U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute-series Figures 1.1-1 and topographic maps with mileposts showing the project facilities. (§ 1.1-5 380.12(c)(3)) • Maps of equivalent detail are acceptable if legible (check with staff) • Show locations of all linear project elements, and label them. • Show locations of all significant aboveground facilities, and label them. 4. Provide aerial images or photographs or alignment sheets based on these Figures 1.1-2 and sources with mileposts showing the project facilities. (§ 380.12(c)(3)) 1.1-6 • No more than 1-year old • Scale no smaller than 1:6,000 5. Provide plot/site plans of compressor stations showing the location of the Figure 1.1-7, no nearest noise sensitive areas (NSA) within 1 mile. (§ 380.12(c)(3,4)) compressor • Scale no smaller than 1:3,600 stations • Show reference to topographic maps and aerial alignments provided above. 6. Describe construction and restoration methods. (§ 380.12(c)(6)) Section 1.3 • Include this information by milepost • Make sure this is provided for offshore construction as well. For the offshore this information is needed on a mile-by-mile basis and will require completion of geophysical and other surveys before filing. 7. Identify the permits required for construction across surface waters. (§ Section 1.6 380.12(c)(9)) • Include the status of all permits. • For construction in the Federal offshore area be sure to include consultation with the MMS. File with the MMS for rights-of-way grants at the same time or before you file with the FERC. 8. Provide the names and address of all affected landowners and certify that all To be provided affected landowners will be notified as required in § 157.6(d). (§ under separate 380.12(c)(10)) cover • Affected landowners are defined in § 157.6(d) i LLNG RR1 20150728 Docket No. PF14-17-000 DRAFT Resource Report 1: General Project Description Summary of Filing Information – Minimum Requirements Resource Report Information Location • Provide an electronic copy directly to the environmental staff. Additional Information Resource Report Location Describe all authorizations required to complete the proposed action and Section 1.6 the status of applications for such authorizations. Provide Plot/site plans of all other aboveground facilities that are not Not Applicable completely within the right-of-way. Provide detailed typical construction right-of-way cross-section diagrams Will be provided in showing information such as widths and relative locations of existing final draft rights-of-way, new permanent right-of-way, and temporary construction right-of-way. Summarize the total acreage of land affected by construction and Tables 1.2-1 operation of the project. through 1.2-3 If Resource Report 5, Socioeconomics is not provided, provide the start Section 1.3 and end dates of construction, the number of pipeline spreads that would be used, and the workforce per spread. Send two (2) additional copies of topographic maps and aerial Will be provided in images/photographs directly to the environmental staff of the Office of final draft Energy Projects (OEP). ii LLNG RR1 20150728 Docket No. PF14-17-000 DRAFT Resource Report 1: General Project Description TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 1.1 PROPOSED FACILITIES 1 1.1.1 Purpose and Need 1 1.1.2 Location and Description of Facilities 2 1.1.3 Location Maps, Detailed Route Maps, and Plot/Site Plans 7 1.2 LAND REQUIREMENTS 8 1.2.1 Pipeline Facilities 8 1.2.2 Aboveground Facilities 9 1.3 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE, WORKFORCE AND STRATEGIES 10 1.3.1 Project Schedule 10 1.3.2 Project Workforce 10 1.3.3 Construction Strategy 11 1.4 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 14 1.5 FUTURE PLANS AND ABANDONMENT 15 1.6 PERMITS AND APPROVALS 15 1.7 POTENTIAL STAKEHOLDERS AND AFFECTED LANDOWNERS 19 1.8 NON-JURISDICTIONAL FACILITIES 19 1.8.1 Off-site Assembly, Laydown and Storage 19 iii LLNG RR1 20150728 Docket No. PF14-17-000 DRAFT Resource Report 1: General Project Description TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT’D) List of Tables Table 1.1-1: On-Site Chemical Storage Table 1.2-1: Summary of Land Requirements Table 1.2-2: Land Requirements for Pipeline Facilities Table 1.2-3: Land Requirements for Aboveground Facilities Table 1.6-1: Permits and Consultations for the Project APPENDICES 1A List of Figures Figure 1.1-1 Project Location Topographical Map Figure 1.1-2 Project Location Aerial Map Figure 1.1-3 Site Topographic Map Figure 1.1-4 Site Aerial Map Figure 1.1-5 Plot Plan Topographic Map Figure 1.1-6 Plot Plan Aerial Map Figure 1.1-7 NSA Topographical Map Figure 1.1-8 NSA Aerial Map Figure 1.1-9 Project Area Topographical Map Figure 1.1-10 Project Area Aerial Map 1B STAKEHOLDER LIST FOR THE PROJECT 1C DOCUMENTATION OF AGENCY CORRESPONDENCE iv LLNG RR1 20150728 Docket No. PF14-17-000 DRAFT Resource Report 1: General Project Description ACRONYMS ACI American Concrete Institute API American Petroleum Institute Bcf/d Billion Standard Cubic Feet per Day BOG Boil off Gas CFR Code of Federal Regulations CO2 Carbon Dioxide EFH Essential Fish Habitat EI Environmental Inspectors EPA Environmental Protection Agency FAA Federal Aviation Administration Facility Liquefaction Export Facility FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission HDD Horizontal Directional Drill HPGT High Point Gas Transmission H2S Hydrogen Sulfide LA 15 Louisiana Highway 15 LA 39 Louisiana Highway 39 LADOTD Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development LB/FT2 Pounds per Square Foot LB/FT3 Pounds per Cubic Foot LDEQ Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality LDNR Louisiana Department of Natural Resources LDWF Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries LLNG Louisiana LNG Energy, LLC LNG Liquefied Natural Gas MMcf/d Million Standard Cubic Feet per Day MPH Miles per Hour MR Mixed Refrigerant M Cubic Meters MTPA Million Tonnes per Annum NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NFPA National Fire Protection Association NGA Natural Gas Act NGL Natural Gas Liquids NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service PHMSA Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Plan FERC Upland Erosion Control, Revegetation and Maintenance Plan Procedures FERC Wetland and Waterbody Construction and Mitigation Procedures PSIG Pounds per Square Inch Gauge ROW Right-of-Way SHPO Louisiana State Historic Preservation Office TGP Tennessee Gas Pipeline µg/Nm3 Microgram per Normal Cubic Meter USC United States Code USCG United States Coast Guard v LLNG RR1 20150728 Docket No. PF14-17-000 DRAFT Resource Report 1: General Project Description ACRONYMS (CONT’D) USDOT U.S. Department of Transportation USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service USGS United States Geological Survey USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers vi LLNG RR1 20150728 Docket No. PF14-17-000 DRAFT Resource Report 1: General Project Description 1.0 General Project Description Louisiana LNG Energy, LLC (LLNG) is proposing to site, construct, and operate a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export project (Project) on the east bank of the Mississippi River at mile marker 46 in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. The Project will include a new liquefaction facility that will produce up to 6.0 million tonnes per annum (MTPA) of LNG for export to global customers. Natural gas will be delivered to the liquefaction facility from the existing interstate pipeline system of High Point Gas Transmission (HPGT) and Tennessee Gas interstate pipeline (TGP) systems, both located close to the Project site. This preliminary draft Resource Report 1 describes LLNG’s proposed liquefaction facilities and ancillary facilities for which LLNG is seeking authorization from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). LLNG will file applications with the FERC to construct the Facility (defined below) pursuant to Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), 15 U.S.C. § 717b, and to construct the Pipelines (defined below) supplying the Facility under either Section 3 or Section 7(c) of the NGA, as appropriate. 15 U.S.C. §§ 717b and 717f(c). 1.1 Proposed Facilities The proposed Project consists of: 1. A liquefaction export facility (Facility) to be located along the east bank of the Mississippi River at mile marker 46, in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana; and 2. Construction of a 1.9-mile (approximate length), 36-inch diameter pipeline to deliver gas from the HPGT interstate pipeline system to the Facility and construction of a 3.5-mile (approximate length), 36-inch diameter pipeline to deliver gas from the TGP system to the Facility (collectively, the Pipelines). The Facility will receive natural gas for conversion to LNG and for loading on ships for export. This preliminary draft Resource Report 1 provides an overview of the Project, including the Facility’s purpose and need, location and detailed description, land requirements, construction execution plans and anticipated construction schedule, operations and maintenance philosophies, future plans and abandonment discussion, required permits, potentially affected landowners, public outreach and non-jurisdictional facilities.
Recommended publications
  • Louisiana State | Senate
    OFFICIAL JOURNAL SENATE BILL NO. 260— BY SENATOR MORRISH AND REPRESENTATIVE SMITH OF THE AN ACT To amend and reenact R.S. 17:3973(2)(a) and (3), 3982(B)(1) and SENATE (2)(a), 3983(A)(4)(a) and (d) and (B)(2), 3991(H), the OF THE introductory paragraph of 3995(A)(1) and (c), (3)(b), and (4)(a)(i) and (H), 3996(G), and 4001(A) and (C)(1) and (2) and STATE OF LOUISIANA to repeal R.S. 17:3973(2)(b)(vi) and (4), 3974(A), 3981.1, _______ 3981.2, and 3983(A)(2)(d), (D)(2), and (E)(3), relative to charter FORTY-THIRD DAY'S PROCEEDINGS schools; to revise the definition of a chartering authority; to _______ remove the authority of the State Board of Elementary and Forty-Second Regular Session of the Legislature Secondary Education to certify certain entities as local charter Under the Adoption of the authorizers; to remove the authority of local charter authorizers Constitution of 1974 to approve charter proposals and to enter into charters; to _______ eliminate certain types of charter schools; and to provide for related matters. Senate Chamber State Capitol Reported without amendments. Baton Rouge, Louisiana Monday, May 30, 2016 SENATE BILL NO. 262— BY SENATOR MORRISH AND REPRESENTATIVES PRICE AND SMITH The Senate was called to order at 4:15 o'clock P.M. by Hon. AN ACT John A. Alario Jr., President of the Senate. To enact R.S. 17:24.4(F)(1)(g), relative to statewide content standards and assessments for required subjects; to provide for the use of such results and information for specified purposes Morning Hour including for purposes of distributing school and district letter grades, teacher evaluations, and pupil progression; and to CONVENING ROLL CALL provide for related matters.
    [Show full text]
  • C:\TEMP\Copy of 13RS
    OFFICIAL JOURNAL SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 127— BY SENATOR LONG OF THE A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION To commend Colonel Mike Edmonson, Superintendent of State SENATE Police, on receiving the 2013 Buford Pusser National Law OF THE Enforcement Award. STATE OF LOUISIANA _______ Reported without amendments. THIRTY-THIRD DAY'S PROCEEDINGS SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 128— _______ BY SENATORS GALLOT, KOSTELKA, LONG, RISER AND THOMPSON AND REPRESENTATIVES SHADOIN AND JEFFERSON Thirty-Ninth Regular Session of the Legislature A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Under the Adoption of the To commend and congratulate Terry and Rosy Bromell on their Constitution of 1974 fiftieth wedding anniversary. _______ Senate Chamber Reported without amendments. State Capitol Baton Rouge, Louisiana SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 25— BY SENATOR GALLOT Tuesday, June 4, 2013 A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION To urge and request the Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State The Senate was called to order at 10:20 o'clock A.M. by Hon. University and Agricultural and Mechanical College and the John A. Alario Jr., President of the Senate. governor to keep the Huey P. Long Medical Center open and viable. Morning Hour Reported without amendments. CONVENING ROLL CALL SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 57— BY SENATORS MARTINY, APPEL, CORTEZ, CROWE, GUILLORY, The roll being called, the following members answered to their JOHNS, LONG, MILLS, NEVERS, PEACOCK, PERRY, THOMPSON, names: WALSWORTH, WARD AND WHITE AND REPRESENTATIVES STUART BISHOP, BURFORD, HENRY BURNS, CARMODY, CHANEY, CONNICK, FANNIN, GUINN, HARRIS, HENRY, HILL, HODGES, HOFFMANN, PRESENT HOWARD, IVEY, LOPINTO, MACK, ORTEGO, PEARSON, POPE, PUGH, RICHARD, SCHRODER, SIMON, STOKES AND TALBOT Mr. President Erdey Peacock A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION Allain Gallot Riser To urge and request the various departments to take certain actions Amedee Johns Smith, G.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairmen Insist on Public Plan Blue Dogs Remain Opposed
    VOL. 54, NO. 143 WEDNESDAY, JUNE 10, 2009 $3.75 Chairmen Insist On Public Plan Blue Dogs Remain Opposed By Steven T. Dennis and Tory Newmyer ROLL CALL STAFF House Democratic chairmen plan to disregard conservative Blue Dogs who are opposing a government-sponsored health in- surance plan as part of a sweeping reform bill, in what is shaping up to be the biggest internal battle of President Barack Obama’s young agenda. Just days after Blue Dogs insist- ed that no public option be includ- Bill Clark/Roll Call ed in the package — except as a Sen. Chris Dodd, seen at a news conference Tuesday on the impact of high health costs, is right in possible fallback that could be the middle of issues at the top of the Congressional agenda — and he faces a tough re-election fight. “triggered” years from now — the File Photo powerful chairmen unveiled a draft Rep. Charlie Rangel: “We’re bill that strongly backs a public op- going to have a public plan.” Dodd Juggles Triple Challenge tion without such a trigger. “There won’t be any considera- of writing the bill — Rangel, En- By David M. Drucker Housing and Urban Affairs chair- tion of the trigger,” Ways and ergy and Commerce Chairman and Emily Pierce K Street has mixed views of man, but he also is acting as a stand- Means Chairman Charlie Rangel Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and ROLL CALL STAFF health proposal, p. 9. in for an ailing Health, Education, (D-N.Y.) said. “We’re going to Education and Labor Chairman President Barack Obama’s am- Labor and Pensions Chairman Ed- have a public plan and we’re not George Miller (D-Calif.) — re- bitious goals of rewriting the books thin Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012
    VERIZON POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS JANUARY – DECEMBER 2012 1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 20 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon in 2012. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Senior Vice President, Public Policy 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2012 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? and the government agencies administering the federal and individual state election laws.
    [Show full text]
  • ORDINANCE NO. 19- the Following
    ORDINANCE NO. 19- The following Ordinance was offered by Commissioner Cognevich who moved its adoption: 1 An Ordinance to amend and as amended re-adopt Rule 1 in Chapter I of Section 2- 2 18 of the Code of Ordinances for Plaquemines Parish relative to the Plaquemines 3 Port, Harbor & Terminal District; to rescind, annul and set-aside Ordinance Nos. 4 19-37 and 16-46; and otherwise to provide with respect thereto. 5 6 WHEREAS, over the years, the location, time and numbers meetings each month the Plaquemines, 7 Port, Harbor & Terminal District meetings are held have changed via Ordinance Nos. 19-37 and 8 16-46; and 9 10 WHEREAS, currently Rule 1 of Section 2-18 in Chapter I of the Code of Ordinances provides for 11 the Plaquemines Parish Council as the Sole Governing Authority of the Plaquemines Port, Harbor 12 & Terminal District to meet twice a month at certain locations at 1:00 p.m. or immediately before 13 the Plaquemines Parish Council meetings; and 14 15 WHEREAS, it is the desire of this Council to schedule the meetings of the Plaquemines Port, 16 Harbor & Terminal District at 5:00 p.m. or immediately before the Plaquemines Parish Council 17 meetings; 18 19 NOW, THEREFORE: 20 21 BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PLAQUEMINES PARISH COUNCIL AS THE SOLE 22 GOVERNING AUTHORITY OF THE PLAQUEMINES PORT, HARBOR & TERMINAL 23 DISTRICT THAT: 24 25 SECTION 1 26 27 Rule 1 of Chapter I of Section 2-18 of the Code of Ordinances for Plaquemines Parish, LA shall 28 be amended and, as amended, re-adopted to read as follows: 29 30 “Rule 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Regents Recap Highlights of the Activities and Official Actions of the Louisiana Board of Regents February 28, 2005
    Regents Recap Highlights of the Activities and Official Actions of the Louisiana Board of Regents February 28, 2005 Louisiana College Student Leaders Attend Presidential Inauguration Louisiana was well represented at last month’s presidential inauguration in Washington. Among other distinguished Louisiana attendees who braved the cold to witness the historical event were twenty members of the Louisiana Council of Student Body Presidents (COSBP). The group took advantage of the opportunity to visit several members of Louisiana’s congressional delegation as well. COSBP is a statewide organization of Louisiana public college and university Student Government Association and Student Bar Association presidents aimed at helping ensure that Louisiana’s colleges and universities remain responsive to the needs of students and that student opportunity for academic and career success is optimized. “It was an honor to represent Louisiana and our respective institutions in Washington, and to see first-hand the president and vice president of the United States sworn into office,” said Kimberly Ludwig, Louisiana Tech SGA president and statewide COSBP chair. “We all felt very privileged and thankful to all the members of the Louisiana legislative delegation who made our trip possible.” Ludwig also serves as the student board member on the University of Louisiana System Board of Supervisors. On the day before the inauguration, the group enjoyed visits with Louisiana’s two U.S. Senators, Mary Landrieu and David Vitter, and with Louisiana Congressmen Rodney Alexander, Richard Baker, Charles Boustany, Bobby Jindal, and Jim McCrery. “The trip was a great civics and history lesson,” said Katie Ortego, SGA President at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette.
    [Show full text]
  • Steve Scalise (R) Rep
    District Background: Louisiana - 1 Rep. Steve Scalise (R) Relevant committees: None Bike Caucus member: No Member Profile Past Support » Co-sponsored the 2011 Complete Streets bill (HR 1780) No » Signed letter to Transportation Secretary supporting non-motorized No safety performance measure Current Bills » Co-sponsor of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Act (HR 3494) No » Co-sponsor of the Safe Streets Act (HR 2468) No » Co-sponsor of the New Opportunities for Bicycle and Pedestrian No Infrastructure Financing Act (HR 3978) District Profile Population Centers Houma, Metairie, Kenner, New Orleans, Hammond Bicycling Means Business: District Level for 2012 Bicycle Retail Stores in District: 41 Bicycle Retail Jobs: 186 Annual Gross Revenue: $13,860,000 State Profile State Complete Streets Policy? Yes 15.8% Percentage of state roadway fatalities that are bicyclists and pedestrians 0.2% Percent of Highway Safety Improvement Program funding spent on bicycle and pedestrian projects District Background: Louisiana - 2 Rep. Cedric Richmond (D) Relevant committees: None Bike Caucus member: No Member Profile Past Support » Co-sponsored the 2011 Complete Streets bill (HR 1780) No » Signed letter to Transportation Secretary supporting non-motorized No safety performance measure Current Bills » Co-sponsor of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Act (HR 3494) No » Co-sponsor of the Safe Streets Act (HR 2468) No » Co-sponsor of the New Opportunities for Bicycle and Pedestrian No Infrastructure Financing Act (HR 3978) District Profile Population Centers New Orleans, Marrero, Kenner, Laplace, Baton Rouge, Baker Bicycling Means Business: District Level for 2012 Bicycle Retail Stores in District: 21 Bicycle Retail Jobs: 103 Annual Gross Revenue: $8,230,000 State Profile State Complete Streets Policy? Yes 15.8% Percentage of state roadway fatalities that are bicyclists and pedestrians 0.2% Percent of Highway Safety Improvement Program funding spent on bicycle and pedestrian projects District Background: Louisiana - 3 Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION in the Matter Of
    BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION In the Matter of ) ) Republican National Committee and ) MUR 6888 i Anthony Parker in his official capacity ). as treasurer; American Crossroads and ) Caleb Crosby in his official capacity as ); treasurer; Crossroads GPS; Americans ; for Prosperity; GOP Data Trust LLC; ) ] i360, LLC; National Republican j: 5 Senatorial Committee and Keith A. ) Davis in his official capacity as ) treasurer; Freedom Partners Action ) Fund, Inc., and Thomas F Maxwell III in ) his official capacity as treasurer; ) State Party Committee Respondents: ) Arizona Republican Party and Timothy ) Lee in his official capacity as treasurer; ) Montana Republican State Central ') Committee and Deborah Brown in her ") official capacity as treasurer; West ) Virginia Republican Parly, Inc. and ) Michelle Wilshere in her official capacity :) as Treasurer; Massachusetts Republican :)• Party and Brent T. Andersen in his official :). capacity as treasurer; ) Candidate and Authorized Committee ) Respondents: ) ) Andrew Walter; ) Andrew Walter for Congress and Chris ) Marston in his official capacity as )• treasurer; ) Benjamin Sasse; Ben Sasse for US Senate > Inc. and Mark Fahleson in his official ,) capacity as treasurer; .) Carl DeMaio; .:) Carl DeMaio for Congress and Paul ) Kilgore in his official capacity as treasurer; ) Robert Goodlatte; ). Bob Goodlatte for Congress Committee ) and Kenneth Lorenz Prickitt in his official ) Federal Election Commission MUR6888 February 25,2016 capacity as Treasurer; Robert T. Schilling; Bobby Schilling
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C
    BEFORE THE Federal Communications Commission WASHINGTON, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Broadcast Localism ) MB Docket No. 04-233 ) To: The Commission SUBMISSION OF UNITED RADIO BROADCASTERS OF NEW ORLEANS United Radio Broadcasters ofNew Orleans (“United Radio”), a cooperative alliance of Entercom New Orleans License, LLC (“Entercom”),’ Clear Channel Broadcasting Licenses, Inc. (“Clear Channel”),2 and Apex Broadcasting, Inc. (“Apex”),3 by its attorneys, hereby submits the written statement ofDick Lewis, Clear Channel’s Regional Vice President for Louisiana and Southern Mississippi, and a transcription ofthe testimony of Diane Newman, Entercom’s Operations Manager at Station WWL(AM), New Orleans, Louisiana, delivered at the Commission’s Open Meeting on the Effects of Hurricane Katrina, held in Atlanta, Georgia on September 15, 2005. United Radio requests that this submission be associated with the public record in the above-captioned proceeding. As Mr. Lewis and Ms. Newman described at the Open Meeting, United Radio Broadcasters ofNew Orleans was created as an unlikely partnership between two usually intense competitors in the New Orleans radio market. With flood waters rising afterthe fierce and Entercom is the licensee of Stations WEZB(FM), WKBU(FM), WLMG(FM), WSMB(AM), and WWL(AM) New Orleans, Louisiana and WTKL(FM), Kenner, Louisiana. 2 Clear Channel is the licensee of Stations WNOE-FM, WODT(AM), WQUE-FM, WRNO-FM, WYLD(AM), and WYLD-FM New Orleans, Louisiana and KHEV(FM), Houma, Louisiana. Apex is the licensee of Stations KLCL, Lake Charles, Louisiana, and KJEF, Jennings, Louisiana. 2 devastating effects of Hurricane Katrina, Entercom and Clear Channel agreed to share staff, facilities and resources to get critical, life-saving information to the people ofNew Orleans and the surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Public Safety Gaming Enforcement Division
    DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY GAMING ENFORCEMENT DIVISION PERFORMANCE AUDIT ISSUED DECEMBER 9, 2009 LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR 1600 NORTH THIRD STREET POST OFFICE BOX 94397 BATON ROUGE, LOUISIANA 70804-9397 LEGISLATIVE AUDIT ADVISORY COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE NOBLE E. ELLINGTON, CHAIRMAN SENATOR NICHOLAS “NICK” GAUTREAUX SENATOR WILLIE L. MOUNT SENATOR EDWIN R. MURRAY SENATOR BEN W. NEVERS, SR. SENATOR JOHN R. SMITH REPRESENTATIVE NEIL C. ABRAMSON REPRESENTATIVE CHARLES E. “CHUCK” KLECKLEY REPRESENTATIVE ANTHONY V. LIGI, JR. REPRESENTATIVE CEDRIC RICHMOND TEMPORARY LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR DARYL G. PURPERA, CPA, CFE DIRECTOR OF PERFORMANCE AUDIT DAVID K. GREER, CPA FOR QUESTIONS RELATED TO THIS PERFORMANCE AUDIT, CONTACT MIKE BATTLE, PERFORMANCE AUDIT MANAGER, AT 225-339-3800. Under the provisions of state law, this report is a public document. A copy of this report has been submitted to the Governor, to the Attorney General, and to other public officials as required by state law. A copy of this report has been made available for public inspection at the Baton Rouge office of the Legislative Auditor. This document is produced by the Legislative Auditor, State of Louisiana, Post Office Box 94397, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70804-9397 in accordance with Louisiana Revised Statute 24:513. Nine copies of this public document were produced at an approximate cost of $47.25. This material was produced in accordance with the standards for state agencies established pursuant to R.S. 43:31. This report is available on the Legislative Auditor’s Web site at www.lla.la.gov. When contacting the office, you may refer to Agency ID No. 9726 or Report ID No.
    [Show full text]
  • Memorandum of Understanding Between Department of Social Services Office of the Secretary and Louisiana State Police
    MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY AND LOUISIANA STATE POLICE This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is entered into by the Department of Social Services (DSS), Office of the Secretary (DSS/OS) and the Louisiana State Police. I. Background This MOU facilitates the working relationship between the aforementioned departments during times of emergency activation. II. Liaison Officials Louisiana Department of Social Services: The primary point of contact that shall function as the lead liaison for all implementation of services described in this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreement is as follows: Name: Joshua Gill Address: 627 North 4th Street, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802 Telephone: 225-342-4961 (office) 225-456-4343 (cell) Email: [email protected] Louisiana State Police: The primary point of contact who shall serve as lead liaison regarding implementation of services described in this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) agreement is as follows: Name: Nicole Kilgore Address: 7919 Independence Blvd., Baton Rouge, LA 70806 Telephone: 225-925-7765 Email: [email protected] The above individuals shall serve as the contact for the following functions: fiscal and budgetary decisions, programmatic decisions, daily program operation, service delivery operations, and program monitoring. III. Purpose To describe the supporting role the Louisiana State Police plays in support of the Department of Social Services in ESF-6 coordination and the delivery of Mass Care, Housing and Human Services during state assisted emergencies, as prescribed in the state ESF-6 plan. IV. Statement of Work A. LOUISIANA STATE POLICE 1. PREPAREDNESS The Louisiana State Police will: • Provide Security as appropriate at each MSNS, TMOSA, CTNS and FMS.
    [Show full text]
  • Highway Program Fy 2013-2014
    HIGHWAY PROGRAM FY 2013-2014 SORTED BY CATEGORY LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT FOR LEGISLATIVE REVIEW AND APPROVAL INTRODUCTION 1. R.S. 48:229, 230 states that each year “the Department shall provide the Legislature a program of construction to be commenced in the ensuing fiscal year, which shall be based upon anticipated revenues to be appropriated by the Legislature…” The Department shall also provide the Legislature a list of projects “which are in various stages of planning and preparation”. 2. In compliance with this statute, the attached Highway Program identifies the projects that are scheduled for construction letting in FY 2013-14. These are denoted as being in Stage 4. Projects being developed in the other stages are also included in the document. 3. There are many projects remaining to be let prior to the end of the current fiscal year, FY 2012-13. For informational purposes, these projects are also listed in this document. In the event any of these projects cannot be let as planned, they will become part of the FY 2013-14 construction program, and will be let as soon as practicable in that fiscal year. 4. The one year construction program and the list of other projects in various stages are combined into this document which is called the Highway Priority Program or Highway Program. These projects are also submitted to the Federal Highway Administration, and along with the Transit Program, are referred to as the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). The Public Hearings held each year in each Highway District fulfill both the State and Federal requirements for public involvement regarding these programs.
    [Show full text]