1.0 Introduction 1.1 Objective of This Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1.0 Introduction 1.1 Objective of This Document 1 1.0 Introduction The New Jersey Historic Preservation ing fieldwork, and preparing a written report. Office is pleased to introduce the Guidelines for To establish the purpose of the survey, one Architectural Survey. With the implementation of must answer: Why is the survey being under- these guidelines, New Jersey becomes one of taken? What information and analysis must many states to set forth professional standards result? How and from where will the necessary and guidelines for historic architectural survey information be generated or retrieved to ad- (Ohio, Massachusetts, and Delaware, have used dress this purpose? Background research is then similar guidelines for several years), and the geared to the survey purpose. Research can HPO continues its mission of helping the relate to a broad overview of many properties citizens of New Jersey identify, preserve, (as in a published county history) or to a single protect and sustain our collective architectural property (as in deed research). Field work and archaeological heritage. entails the physical and visual identification, Architectural survey is defined as the pro- documentation, and recordation of historic cess of identifying and gathering information resources in the survey area. Finally, the re- about historic architectural resources, and these search and fieldwork are synthesized into a Guidelines have been developed by the HPO written report that presents survey findings to aid and inform anyone undertaking that with illustrations and text, and summarizes the process. Although referred to as “architectural,” methodology of the first three steps. a survey of historic properties should look The Guidelines address these and other beyond buildings to include all visible aspects aspects of architectural survey, and complement of the built environment that combine to form the HPO’s archaeological survey and reporting our historic fabric, such as bridges and dams, guidelines: wharves and ships, canals, windmills, silos, ➤ Guidelines for Phase I Archaeological Investiga- cemeteries, parks and gardens, etc. tions: Identification of Archaeological Resources Four basic steps apply to the process of ➤ Guidelines for the Preparation of Cultural architectural survey: establishing the purpose Resources Management Archaeological Reports for the survey, conducting research, undertak- Submitted to the Historic Preservation Office. 1.1 Objective of This Document As noted above, State Historic Preservation uniformity and consistency in data collection. Offices (SHPO’s) are working to make survey The HPO encourages other agencies and standards clear, concise, and predictable. These organizations to adopt these Guidelines and Guidelines are designed to aid individuals, incorporate them into their standards of prac- communities, organizations, and government tice. Local governments may use the guidelines agencies undertaking historic architectural to aid in the administration of local ordinances surveys for planning purposes or undertaking adopted pursuant to the New surveys to meet regulatory requirements. The Jersey Municipal Land Guidelines outline the standards used by the Use Law,1 and regu- HPO in contracting and reviewing surveys, and lated agencies may provide guidance on the content and format of rely on these Guide- survey products to help ensure to ensure that lines to ensure that survey products meet generally accepted all submissions professional standards. The Guidelines present provide sufficient the basic underlying concepts of architectural information for survey, and introduce the HPO’s new system of regulatory consulta- survey forms, which are designed to ensure tion and decision Victorian House in Cape May, Cape May County. 1 New Jersey, Municipal Land Use Law Chapter 291, Laws of N.J. 1975 (40:55D-1et.seq.). 2 making. These Guidelines are meant to be used properties to be surveyed is developed during in concert with the National Park Service’s the research phase of the survey itself, such as National Register Bulletin #24: Guidelines for Local the survey Black Historic Sites in New Jersey4, Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning,2 which where the list of properties to be included could remains the best available how-to guide for both not be developed without supporting research. professionals and laypersons. The complex nature of thematic surveys often Please note that these Guidelines pertain to involves highly specific research sources and/or architectural surveys that cover a specific unique survey procedures and are therefore geographic area. Not addressed in this docu- beyond the scope of these Guidelines. ment are architectural surveys that are con- Other types of planning documents not ducted based on themes or property types. within the scope of these Guidelines include Generally referred to as “thematic surveys,” historic structure reports and preservation plans. these may be considered “closed” or “open.” The HPO’s 1998 publication Historic Structure Closed thematic surveys are those in which the Reports and Preservation Plans: A Preparation list of properties to be surveyed is known at the Guide provides guidance specific to these types outset; such as the survey Operating Railroad of documents. Please contact the HPO for Stations of New Jersey3, where the list of stations copies or for additional information related to was developed prior to the survey. Open the- developing thematic surveys. matic surveys are those in which the list of New Jersey Transit Station, Bradley Beach Borough, Monmouth County 1.2 Why Surveys are Conducted The process of architectural survey derives properties is in the public interest and worthy of from both planning and regulatory information government intervention. needs. From the planning perspective, the Historic properties can define community desire to protect and preserve significant character, and create a unique sense of place. aspects of our past for future generations Preservation planning relies on the information necessitates an inventory of historic properties generated from planning surveys to designate (referred to throughout this document as historic landmarks and districts, and establish “planning surveys”) to enable informed plan- guidelines and ordinances for their protection. ning decisions. Regulatory requirements for This information may also be used to increase architectural survey (referred to public awareness and appreciation of a throughout this document as community’s history through public education, “regulatory surveys”) increased tourism, and community revitaliza- stem from the recog- tion. Local, county and state government nition that agencies and organizations can rely on the consideration Guidelines for Architectural Survey to help accom- of historic plish the preservation related goals of the New High Breeze Farm Barn, Waywayanda State Park, Sussex County. 2Derry, Ann et al. National Register Bulletin 24: Guidelines for Lacal Surveys: A Basis for Preservation Planning. Washington, D.C.: National Park Service, 1977 (Revised 1985) 3Heritage Studies, Inc. The Operating Railroad Stations of New Jersey: An Historical Survey. Princeton, N.J. 1981. 4New Jersey Historical Commission. Black Historic Sites in New Jersey. October 12, 1984 3 identification and registration activities - coordinate the identification of historic areas, historic sites, landscapes, archaeological sites and scenic corridors for inclusion in the New Jersey and National Registers, local designation, and planning documents municipal programs - include historic surveys and scenic corridors in local master plans preservation guidelines - ensure uniformity in guidelines used by all levels of govern- ment for the preservation and rehabilitation of historic buildings historic resource and development regulations - protect the character of historic sites, landscapes and structures through flexible application of zoning ordinances, construction codes and other development regulations historic properties and infrastructure - locate and design public and private infrastructure improvements to protect historic properties and their settings from the immedi- ate and cumulative effects of construction and maintenance of these improvements Jersey State Development and Redevelopment Plan: licensed, or funded projects. The regulatory The regulatory framework for historic survey accomplishes the identification compo- architectural survey stems from a variety of laws nent of these requirements, and should occur as and regulations that require government early as possible in project planning and devel- agencies to consider historic properties prior to opment. the implementation of publicly sponsored, 1.3 Explaining the Different Levels of Survey The National Park Service (NPS), the overview section that communicates important federal agency responsible for national preser- background information about the survey area vation policy, has defined two levels of survey and its historic resources. activity: reconnaissance and intensive. Both Intensive-level surveys require in-depth require fieldwork and research to record a historical research and documentation to community’s history, architecture, and archaeol- support an assessment of a property’s eligibility ogy, but they differ in the level of effort ex- for the New Jersey and National Registers of pended on these activities. Historic Places. Intensive-level survey activity A reconnaissance-level survey is preliminary more fully documents the physical characteris- in nature and light in
Recommended publications
  • SUSSEX County
    NJ DEP - Historic Preservation Office Page 1 of 9 New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 9/28/2021 SUSSEX County Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Lackawanna Cutoff SUSSEX County Historic District (ID#3454) SHPO Opinion: 3/22/1994 Also located in: Andover Borough MORRIS County, Roxbury Township Andover Borough Historic District (ID#2591) SUSSEX County, Andover Borough SHPO Opinion: 10/22/1991 SUSSEX County, Andover Township SUSSEX County, Green Township 20 Brighton Avenue (ID#3453) SUSSEX County, Hopatcong Borough 20 Brighton Avenue SUSSEX County, Stanhope Borough SHPO Opinion: 9/11/1996 WARREN County, Blairstown Township WARREN County, Frelinghuysen Township Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Lackawanna Cutoff WARREN County, Knowlton Township Historic District (ID#3454) SHPO Opinion: 3/22/1994 Morris Canal (ID#2784) See Main Entry / Filed Location: Existing and former bed of the Morris Canal SUSSEX County, Byram Township NR: 10/1/1974 (NR Reference #: 74002228) SR: 11/26/1973 Hole in the Wall Stone Arch Bridge (ID#2906) SHPO Opinion: 4/27/2004 Delaware, Lackawanna, & Western Railroad Sussex Branch over the (Extends from the Delaware River in Phillipsburg Town, Morris and Susses Turnpike west of US Route 206, north of Whitehall Warren County to the Hudson River in Jersey City, Hudson SHPO Opinion: 4/18/1995 County. SHPO Opinion extends period of significance for canal to its 1930 closure.) Pennsylvania-New Jersey Interconnection Bushkill to Roseland See Main Entry / Filed Location: Transmission
    [Show full text]
  • Highlands Environmental Resource Inventory
    DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Please Note: This document should be read in concert with the Final Draft Consistency Review and Recommendations Report prepared by Highlands Council Staff for the Township of Vernon. Vernon Township Highlands Environmental January Resource Inventory 2012 VERNON TOWNSHIP DRAFT HIGHLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY Table of Contents Purpose and Scope ................................................................................................................................... 1 Highlands Region ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Land Use Capability Map Series ................................................................................................................ 2 Highlands Subwatersheds.......................................................................................................................... 5 Forest Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Highlands Open Waters and Riparian Areas ............................................................................................... 8 Steep Slope Protection Areas .................................................................................................................. 12 Critical Habitat ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Land
    [Show full text]
  • Highlands Environmental Resource Inventory
    DRAFT AS APPROVED BY THE HIGHLANDS COUNCIL Vernon Township Highlands Environmental January Resource Inventory 2012 VERNON TOWNSHIP DRAFT HIGHLANDS ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE INVENTORY Table of Contents Purpose and Scope ................................................................................................................................... 1 Highlands Region ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Land Use Capability Map Series ................................................................................................................ 2 Highlands Subwatersheds.......................................................................................................................... 5 Forest Resources ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Highlands Open Waters and Riparian Areas ............................................................................................... 8 Steep Slope Protection Areas .................................................................................................................. 12 Critical Habitat ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Land Preservation and Stewardship ......................................................................................................... 18 Carbonate Rock Areas ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Management Plan, Appalachian National Scenic Trail
    Appalachian National Scenic Trail Resource Management Plan – September 2008 – Recommended: Casey Reese, Interdisciplinary Physical Scientist, Appalachian National Scenic Trail Recommended: Kent Schwarzkopf, Natural Resource Specialist, Appalachian National Scenic Trail Recommended: Sarah Bransom, Environmental Protection Specialist, Appalachian National Scenic Trail Recommended: David N. Startzell, Executive Director, Appalachian Trail Conference Approved: Pamela Underhill, Park Manager, Appalachian National Scenic Trail Concur: Chris Jarvi, Associate Director, Partnerships, Interpretation and Education, Volunteers, and Outdoor Recreation Foreword: Purpose of the Resource Management Plan The purpose of this plan – the Appalachian Trail Resource Management Plan – is to document the Appalachian National Scenic Trail’s natural and cultural resources and describe and set priorities for management, monitoring, and research programs to ensure that these resources are properly protected and cared for. This plan is intended to provide a medium-range, 10-year strategy to guide resource management activities conducted by the Appalachian Trail Park Office and the Appalachian Trail Conservancy (and other partners who wish to participate) for the next decade. It is further intended to establish priorities for funding projects and programs to manage and protect the Trail’s natural and cultural resources. In some cases, this plan recognizes and identifies the need for preparation of future action plans to deal with specific resource management issues. These future plans will be tiered to this document. Management objectives outlined in the Appalachian Trail Resource Management Plan are consistent with the Appalachian Trail Comprehensive Plan (1981, re-affirmed 1987), the Appalachian Trail Statement of Significance (2000), and the Appalachian Trail Strategic Plan (2001, updated 2005). These objectives also are based on the resource protection mandates stated in the NPS Organic Act of 1916 and the Trail’s enabling legislation, the National Trails System Act.
    [Show full text]
  • ALL RECORDS by CO/MUNIC
    NJ DEP - Historic Preservation Office Page 1 of 5 New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places Last Update: 2/25/2004 Rutan Log Cabin (ID#2592) S ussex County Waterloo Village NR: 8/24/1977 (NR Reference #: 77000910) SR: 11/23/1976 Andover Borough (moved from Frankford Township, ca.1989) Andover Borough Historic District (ID#2591) Waterloo Village (ID#2593) SHPO Opinion: 10/22/1991 Musconetcong River and County Route 604 20 Brighton Avenue (ID#3453) NR: 9/13/1977 (NR Reference #: 77000909) 20 Brighton Avenue SR: 2/3/1977 SHPO Opinion: 9/11/1996 Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Lackawanna Cutoff Frankford Township Historic District (ID#3454) Augusta Hill Road Bridge (ID#3523) SHPO Opinion: 3/22/1994 Augusta Hill Road over East Branch Paulins Kill See Main Entry / Filed Location: (Moved) Sussex County, Byram Township Ross Farmstead (ID#3936) Southeastern Corner of intersection of U.S. Route 206 and NJ Route 15 Hole in the Wall Stone Arch Bridge (ID#2906) SHPO Opinion: 5/14/1998 Delaware, Lackawanna, & Western Railroad Sussex Branch over the Morris and Susses Turnpike west of US Route 206, north of Whitehall Rutan Log Cabin and Farm (ID#2594) SHPO Opinion: 4/18/1995 NR: 8/24/1977 (NR Reference #: 77000910) SR: 11/23/1976 Andover Township (moved to Waterloo Village, Byram Township, ca.1989) Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Lackawanna Cutoff Smith Hill Road Bridge (ID#3455) Historic District (ID#3454) SHPO Opinion: 4/6/1990 SHPO Opinion: 3/22/1994 See Main Entry / Filed Location: Sussex County, Byram Township Franklin
    [Show full text]
  • Appalachian National Scenic Trail Resource Management Plan Table of Contents
    Appalachian National Scenic Trail Resource Management Plan – September 2008 – Recommended: Casey Reese, Interdisciplinary Physical Scientist, Appalachian National Scenic Trail Recommended: Kent Schwarzkopf, Natural Resource Specialist, Appalachian National Scenic Trail Recommended: Sarah Bransom, Environmental Protection Specialist, Appalachian National Scenic Trail Recommended: David N. Startzell, Executive Director, Appalachian Trail Conference Approved: Pamela Underhill, Park Manager, Appalachian National Scenic Trail Concur: Chris Jarvi, Associate Director, Partnerships, Interpretation and Education, Volunteers, and Outdoor Recreation Foreword: Purpose of the Resource Management Plan The purpose of this plan – the Appalachian Trail Resource Management Plan – is to document the Appalachian National Scenic Trail’s natural and cultural resources and describe and set priorities for management, monitoring, and research programs to ensure that these resources are properly protected and cared for. This plan is intended to provide a medium-range, 10-year strategy to guide resource management activities conducted by the Appalachian Trail Park Office and the Appalachian Trail Conservancy (and other partners who wish to participate) for the next decade. It is further intended to establish priorities for funding projects and programs to manage and protect the Trail’s natural and cultural resources. In some cases, this plan recognizes and identifies the need for preparation of future action plans to deal with specific resource management issues. These future plans will be tiered to this document. Management objectives outlined in the Appalachian Trail Resource Management Plan are consistent with the Appalachian Trail Comprehensive Plan (1981, re-affirmed 1987), the Appalachian Trail Statement of Significance (2000), and the Appalachian Trail Strategic Plan (2001, updated 2005). These objectives also are based on the resource protection mandates stated in the NPS Organic Act of 1916 and the Trail’s enabling legislation, the National Trails System Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix C: Historic Sites in Sussex County
    Appendix C: Historic Sites in Sussex County The following is a list of historic sites in Sussex County that are included on or recommended for the New Jersey and National Registers of Historic Places. The list was obtained from the New Jersey State Historic Preservation Office updated as of February 13, 2003. Sites officially on the Registers are denoted with SR (State of New Jersey Register) or NR (National Register). Andover Borough Andover Borough Historic District 20 Brighton Avenue Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Lackawanna Cutoff Hole in the Wall Stone Arch Bridge Andover Township Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Cutoff Byram Township Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Cutoff Morris Canal (NR, SR) Rutan Log Cabin, Waterloo Village (NR, SR) Waterloo Village (NR, SR) Frankford Township Augusta Hill Road Bridge Ross Farmstead Smith Hill Road Bridge Franklin Borough Franklin Mine Historic District Franklin Borough Hall Scott Road Bridge Fredon Township Hankinson House Orchard Crest Red Barn Green Township Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Cutoff Hamburg Borough R.E. Edsall Historic Archaeological Site Richard E. Edsall Storehouse Grounds along Lime Kiln Road and Wallkill River Appendix C – Historic Sites 1 Hamburg Site, bluff overlooking Wallkill River Dr. Jackson Pellet House John Linn Jr. Property Hardyston Township Lawrence Mansion (NR, SR) Old Monroe Schoolhouse (NR, SR) Stockholm United Methodist Church (NR, SR) Hopatcong Borough Concrete Barrel Arch Bridge Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Cutoff Old Stone Jail St. Joseph’s Church St. Peter’s Church Montague Township Appalachian Trail Foster-Armstrong House (NR, SR) High Point Park Historic District (NR, SR) Isaac Clark House Millville Historic and Archaeological District (NR, SR) Minisink Archaeological Historic District (NR, SR) Neldon-Hornbeck Farmhouse Neldon-Hornbeck Farm Old Mine Road Histoirc District (NR, SR) Small Stone House (SR) Trovato House, Tract 11215 Newton Town First Presbyterian Church of Newton (SR) Hill Memorial (NR, SR) Henry W.
    [Show full text]
  • March/April 2007
    www.nynjtc.org Connecting People with Nature since 1920 March/April 2007 New York-New Jersey Trail Conference — Maintaining 1,672 Miles of Foot Trails In this issue: Enroll in Trail U This Season...pg 5 • 10,000 Miles in One Year...pg 6 • Lichens and Peepers...pg 7 • Bear Basics...pg 11 the hands of the Trail Conference and town of Mahwah. As of the deadline for this Put yourself Trail Conference issue of Trail Walker, plans were to con- clude the transfer in March. in the picture... The building will be renovated and its mechanical systems installed at an estimat- to Get New Home ed cost of $1 million. Bergen County has committed additional funds to help with 19th-century schoolhouse in chase the historic structure with funds renovation costs, and the Trail Conference Mahwah, NJ, is set to become the donated by Bergen County ($250,000) is in the process of identifying other new A 21st-century home for the Trail and the New Jersey Green Acres Program sources of support for the project. The Conference, thanks to a four-way partner- ($300,000). hope is that the Trail Conference will move ship to preserve a distinctive historic The fourth partner is a land trust, The into the new offices in 2008. structure that sits at the gateway to Bergen Morris Land Conservancy. It negotiated Turn to Ed Goodell’s column on page 3 County’s Highlands. the sale, purchased the property from pri- to learn more about the history of the “This is a great building, at a great location vate owners in January, and is providing the schoolhouse and plans to convert it into for the Trail Conference,” says Executive bridge financing that will put the site into Trail Conference headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Plan Foundation Elements
    APPENDIX A PLAN FOUNDATION ELEMENTS 100 PLAN FOUNDATION ELEMENTS The following sections of the SGP consist of an in-depth discussion of population, housing, natural resources, circulation, historic and cultural features, farmland preservation and open space/recreation in Sussex County. These elements are designed to provide a substantive foundation for the policies and programs advocated as the Strategic Growth Plan. POPULATION ELEMENT The population and housing characteristics of the County, along with natural resource and economic base data will be reviewed as a prelude to linking them to statewide and other regional initiatives. Population Trends and Projections for Sussex County Analysis of the population trends of Sussex County and its municipalities will show where growth has occurred, and also relate Sussex County to its neighboring counties, including those in New York and Pennsylvania. Age, race, income, and other demographic characteristics are described, and population densities show the development patterns that have occurred. Then, using past trends and local planned growth, population projections are provided for Sussex County and its municipalities to the years 2010 and 2020. Growth Trends: From the early 1800s, the population of Sussex County was fairly stable for a century; there was an increase of only 7,500 from 1830 to 1930, to a population of 27,850 in 1930. Since 1950, the population has increased more rapidly, as shown in Figure 2. The growth rate was highest from 1960 to 1970 at 57.4% and the greatest increase in number occurred from 1970 to 1980 with 38,537 new residents. For each decade since 1980, the population increased about 14,000, to 144,166 in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    OMB No. 7024-00J8 NFS Form 10-900 (R«v. a-86) r< /-, ,-••> V J ' >» > United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places JUN291989 Registration Form NATIONAL REQ!81er-L This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property____ historic name High Breeze Farms________________________________________________ other names/site number Barrett Farm _______________________ 2. Location street & number Barrett Road (a.k.a. Barry Road) ____for publication city, town Vernon Township I I vicinity state New Jersey code 034 county Sussex code 037 zip code 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property I I private I~X| building(s) Noncontributing I I public-local I I district ____buildings Q public-State CD site ____ sites I I public-Federal I I structure 1 structures I I object ____ objects 18 1 Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously NA listed in the National Register NA____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this Qnomination LJ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSSEX Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code
    HPO Cultural Resource Reports FILTER SETTINGS: (Sorted by: County / Municipality / Shelf Code) County:: SUSSEX Municipallity: County Code: Agency Code: SUSSEX SUSSEX Countywide Countywide MOR K 194a 2018 ID13433 MULT C 841q 2012 ID10521 Morris Canal Greenway Corridor Study Susquehanna to Roseland 500 kV Transmission Line-PSE&G-New NV5; Arterial; Heritage Strategies; Swell Jersey; Essex, Morris, Sussex, and Warren Counties, New Jersey. Pull Site Proposed Tower (PT) 118b Re-Design: Supplemental Phase IB Report Type: Combined Report Archaeological Survey Jefferson Township, Morris County, NJ Location: SHELVED: CRM The Louis Berger Group, Inc. Report Type: Archaeology Phase I SUS P 149 2002 ID10518 Phase IA Archaeological and Historical Reconnaissance of the Wallkill Location: SHELVED: CRM River National Wildlife Refuge, Sussex County, New Jersey and Orange ID10681 County, New York MULT C 841s 2011 R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Environmental Impact Statement for Proposed Susquehanna to Roseland 500K Transmission Line Affecting Delaware Water Gap Archaeology Phase I Report Type: National Recreation Area, Middle Delaware National Scenic and Location: SHELVED: CRM Recreational River, and Appalachian National Scenic Trail. John Milner Associates, Inc. 1976 ID5837 SUS GB 20 Report Type: Combined Report Master Plan Study Report No. 10, Historic Preservation and Scenic Sites, Sussex County, NJ Location: SHELVED: CRM Department of Planning, Conservation and Economic Development MULT C 841x 2018 ID12815 Combined Report Report Type: Delaware Water Gap National Recreation Area Historic Property Location: SHELVED: GB Management Plan, Susquehanna to Roseland 500 kV Transmission Line Project ID9872 MULT C 841f 2011 Louis Berger Susquehanna to Roseland 500kV Transmission Project Pennsylvania _ Report Type: Architecture Intensive New Jersey Interconnection Wallenpaupack to Siegfried and Bushkill To Roseland Transmission Lines Historic Corridor Report Location: SHELVED: CRM The Louis Berger Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic, Cultural, Scenic, Recreation and Tourism Technical Report
    Historic, Cultural, Scenic, Recreation, and Tourism 2008 Prepared by State of New Jersey Highlands Water Protection and Technical Planning Council in Support of the Highlands Regional Master Plan Report HIGHLANDS REGIONAL MASTER PLAN HIGHLANDS WATER PROTECTION AND PLANNING COUNCIL John R. Weingart | Chairman Kurt Alstede Deborah Pasquarelli Jack Schrier | Vice Chairman Elizabeth Calabrese Erik Peterson William Cogger | Treasurer Tracy C. Carluccio Glen Vetrano Timothy Dillingham Tahesha Way Janice Kovach Scott Whitenack Mimi Letts HIGHLANDS COUNCIL STAFF Eileen Swan | Executive Director Thomas A. Borden | Deputy Executive Director and Chief Counsel Daniel J. Van Abs | Senior Director of Planning and Science Roger Keren | Director of Geographic Information Systems SCIENCE STAFF PLANNING STAFF Christine M. Ross | Sr. Resource Management Specialist Christine M. Danis | Principal Planner James Hutzelmann | Water Resource Engineer Judith A. Thornton | Principal Planner Erin C. Lynam | Resource Management Specialist Maryjude Haddock-Weiler | Regional Planner ASSISTING SCIENCE UNIT Megan I. Lang | Regional Planner Casey Ezyske Erika Webb | Regional Planner Charles Perry ASSISTING PLANNING UNIT Megan Saunders GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS STAFF LEGAL STAFF Carl B. Figueiredo | GIS Specialist Jeffrey P. LeJava | TDR Program Administrator Nathan McLean | GIS Specialist and Staff Attorney Matthew Vitullo | GIS Specialist Kim Ball Kaiser | Staff Attorney ASSISTING GIS UNIT Jennifer Reed OPERATIONS STAFF Paula M. Dees | Executive Assistant Ranji H. Persaud | Manager of Human Resources/Office Sabina Martine | Administrative Assistant Elizabeth Carlson | Information Systems Coordinator Craig Garretson | Manager of Communications Laura Forrest | Administrative Assistant Matthew J. Curtis | Manager of Information Systems Jane Rivers | Administrative Assistant Lindsey Interlante | Manager of Grants Administration Cindy Tonczos | Receptionist PLAN CONSULTANT Charles L. Siemon, Esq.
    [Show full text]