Groupthink How Science Can Shed New Light on the Most Important ‘Non-Debate’ of Our Time Christopher Booker

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Groupthink How Science Can Shed New Light on the Most Important ‘Non-Debate’ of Our Time Christopher Booker GLOBAL WARMING A case study in groupthink How science can shed new light on the most important ‘non-debate’ of our time Christopher Booker The Global Warming Policy Foundation GWPF Report 28 GWPF REPORTS Views expressed in the publications of the Global Warming Policy Foundation are those of the authors, not those of the GWPF, its Academic Advisory Coun- cil members or its directors THE GLOBAL WARMING POLICY FOUNDATION Director Benny Peiser BOARD OF TRUSTEES Lord Lawson (Chairman) Peter Lilley Lord Donoughue Charles Moore Lord Fellowes Baroness Nicholson Rt Revd Dr Peter Forster, Bishop of Chester Graham Stringer MP Sir Martin Jacomb Lord Turnbull ACADEMIC ADVISORY COUNCIL Professor Christopher Essex (Chairman) Professor Ross McKitrick Sir Samuel Brittan Professor Robert Mendelsohn Sir Ian Byatt Professor Garth Paltridge Dr John Constable Professor Ian Plimer Professor Vincent Courtillot Professor Paul Reiter Professor Freeman Dyson Dr Matt Ridley Christian Gerondeau Sir Alan Rudge Professor Larry Gould Professor Nir Shaviv Professor William Happer Professor Henrik Svensmark Professor David Henderson Professor Anastasios Tsonis Professor Terence Kealey Professor Fritz Vahrenholt Professor Deepak Lal Dr David Whitehouse Professor Richard Lindzen CREDITS Cover image The Blind Leading the Blind ©Aleutie/Shutterstock GLOBAL WARMING A case study in groupthink How science can shed new light on the most important ‘non-debate’ of our time Christopher Booker ISBN 978-0-9931190-0-2 © Copyright 2018 The Global Warming Policy Foundation Contents Foreword vii About the author viii Author’s personal note viii Executive summary xi 1 Introduction 1 2 Janis’s theory of groupthink 2 3 The three rules of groupthink 3 4 The power of second-hand thinking 5 5 Global warming and the archetype of groupthink 6 6 The ‘idea whose time had come’ 18 7 The IPCC breaks its own rules: the ‘consensus’ survives its first major scandal 20 8 The ‘consensus’ fudges the evidence 23 9 When groupthink meets the outside world 26 10 The ‘consensus’ and the media 31 11 Hysteria reaches its height 35 12 The story begins to change: dissenting voices 38 13 Groupthink and wishful thinking 44 14 Where did the ‘consensus’ get its ‘facts’? 49 15 Groupthink defends its own 52 16 Aftermath of the crisis, 2010–2014 54 17 Prelude to Paris: ‘adjusting’ the facts to fit the theory (again) 67 v 18 Paris 2015: a final ‘triumph’ for groupthink 70 19 The real global warming disaster: how groupthink shaped the po- litical response 74 20 The peculiar case of the United Kingdom 76 21 President Trump finally calls the groupthink’s bluff 80 22 Conclusions: what happens when the groupthink does meet reality? 82 23 A personal epilogue: the wider picture 93 Notes 96 Foreword By Professor Richard Lindzen The bizarre issue of climate catastrophism has been around sufficiently long that it has become possible to trace its history in detail, and, indeed, several excellent re- cent books do this, placing the issue in the context of a variety of environmental, economic and political trends. Darwall’s Green Tyranny: Exposing the Totalitarian Roots of the Climate Industrial Complex and Lewin’s Searching for the Catastrophe Signal: The Origins of The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change deserve special mention in this connection. Booker’s relatively brief monograph asks a rather different but pro- foundly important question. Namely, how do otherwise intelligent people come to believe such arrant nonsense despite its implausibility, internal contradictions, con- tradictory data, evident corruption and ludicrous policy implications. Booker con- vincingly shows the power of ‘groupthink’ to overpower the rational faculties that we would hope could play some role. The phenomenon of groupthink helps explain why ordinary working people are less vulnerable to this defect. After all, the group that the believers want to belong to is that of the educated elite. This may have played a ma- jor role in the election of Donald Trump, which depended greatly on the frustration of the non-elites (or ‘deplorables’, as Hillary Clinton referred to them) with what they perceived to be the idiocy of their ‘betters’. Booker’s emphasis on the situation in the UK is helpful insofar as there is nowhere that the irrationality of the response to this issue has been more evident, but the problem exists throughout the developed world. The situation everywhere has been reinforced by the existence of numerous individuals and groups that have profited mightily from the hysteria (including academia, where funding predicated on sup- porting alarm has increased by a factor of about 15–20 in the US), but why so many others have gone along, despite the obvious disadvantages of doing so, deserves the attention that Booker provides. Professor Lindzen was Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Masschusetts Insti- tute of Technology until his retirement in 2013. He is a member of the Academic Advisory Council of GWPF. vii About the author Christopher Booker has been writing on climate change and energy issues in the Sun- day Telegraph and elsewhere over the past 11 years. In 2010 his history of the science and politics of global warming, The Real Global Warming Disaster: is the obsession with climate change turning into one of the most costly scientific blunders in history? was ranked by The Bookseller as one of the UK’s three top best-selling books on the envi- ronment in the previous decade, alongside titles by Al Gore and James Lovelock. Born in 1937, he read history at Cambridge and was the founding editor of Private Eye between 1961 and 1963. His other books have included The Neophiliacs: a study of the revolution in English life in the Fifties and Sixties (1969), The Seven Basic Plots: why we tell stories, a psychological analysis of storytelling (2004), The Great Deception, a history of the European Union (co-written with Dr Richard North), and Scared to Death: Why scares are costing us the earth (2007). In 1979 he made an acclaimed BBC television documentary, City of Towers, tracing the crucial influence of Le Corbusier on the post- war redevelopment of Britain’s cities. Author’s personal note Having now written extensively about the global warming issue for over a decade, I kick myself that I did not discover the book that inspired this paper until 2014. When I finally came across Irving Janis’s seminal analysis of ‘groupthink’, I realised justhow much more it helped to explain about the story I and many others had been following for so long. In particular, if I had known about it when in 2009 I published my history of the great alarm over manmade climate change, The Real Global Warming Disaster, it might have been a very different book. Here, more briefly, I look at that story again, brought up to date, but thistime showing how Janis’s theory adds a whole new dimension to our understanding of one of the most remarkable and puzzling episodes in the history of both science and politics. viii It is only by obtaining some sort of insight into the psychology of crowds that it can be understood how powerless they are to hold any opinions other than those which are imposed upon them. Gustave Le Bon, The Crowd As long as one is within a certain phenomenology, one is not astonished and no one wonders what it is all about. Such philosophical doubt only comes to one who is outside the game. C.G. Jung, Psychology and National Problems ix Executive summary By any measure, the belief that the earth faces an unprecedented threat from ‘human- induced climate change’ has been one of the most extraordinary episodes in the his- tory of either science or politics. It has led scientists and politicians to contemplate nothing less than a complete revolution in the way mankind sources the energy re- quired to keep modern industrial civilisation functioning, by phasing out the fossil- fuels on which that civilisation has been built. But for 30 years the way this has all come about has given expert observers cause for increasing puzzlement. In particular they have questioned: • the speed with which the belief that human carbon dioxide emissions were causing the world dangerously to warm came to be proclaimed as being shared by a ‘consensus’ of the world’s climate scientists; • the nature and reliability of much of the evidence being cited to support that belief; • the failure of global temperatures to rise in accordance with the predictions of the computer models on which the ‘consensus’ ultimately rested. But there was also the peculiarly hostile and dismissive nature of the response by supporters of the ‘consensus’ to those who questioned all this, a group that included many eminent scientists and other experts. The purpose of this paper is to use the scientific insights of a professor of psychol- ogy at Yale back in the 1970s to show the entire story of the alarm over global warm- ing in a remarkable new light. The late Professor Irving Janis analysed what happens when people get caught up in what he termed ‘groupthink’, a pattern of collective psychological behaviour with three distinctive features, that we can characterise as rules. • A group of people come to share a particular view or belief without a proper appraisal of the evidence. • This leads them to insist that their belief is shared by a ‘consensus’ of all right- minded opinion. • Because their belief is ultimately only subjective, resting on shaky foundations, they then defend it only by displaying an irrational, dismissive hostility towards anyone daring to question it. This paper begins by showing how strongly all these three symptoms were in ev- idence, right from the start, when, in the late 1980s, the belief that a rise in carbon dioxide levels was causing the earth dangerously to warm was first brought to the world’s attention.
Recommended publications
  • Andrew Montford's the Hockey Stick Illusion Is One of the Best Science
    Andrew Montford‘s The Hockey Stick Illusion is one of the best science books in years. It exposes in delicious detail, datum by datum, how a great scientific mistake of immense political weight was perpetrated, defended and camouflaged by a scientific establishment that should now be red with shame. It is a book about principal components, data mining and confidence intervals—subjects that have never before been made thrilling. It is the biography of a graph. I can remember when I first paid attention to the ―hockey stick‖ graph at a conference in Cambridge. The temperature line trundled along with little change for centuries, then shot through the roof in the 20th century, like the blade of an ice-hockey stick. I had become somewhat of a sceptic about the science of climate change, but here was emphatic proof that the world was much warmer today; and warming much faster than at any time in a thousand years. I resolved to shed my doubts. I assumed that since it had been published in Nature—the Canterbury Cathedral of scientific literature—it was true. I was not the only one who was impressed. The graph appeared six times in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)‘s third report in 2001. It was on display as a backdrop at the press conference to launch that report. James Lovelock pinned it to his wall. Al Gore used it in his film (though describing it as something else and with the Y axis upside down). Its author shot to scientific stardom. ―It is hard to overestimate how influential this study has been,‖ said the BBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Climate
    UGAMP: A network of excellence in climate modelling and research Issue 27 October 2003 UGAMP Coordinator: Prof. Julia Slingo [email protected] Newsletter Editor: Dr. Glenn Carver [email protected] Newsletter website: acmsu.nerc.ac.uk/newsletter.html Contents NCAS News . 2 NCAS Websites . 3 NCAS Centres and Facilities . 3 UGAMP Coordinator . 4 CGAM Director . 4 ACMSU Director . 4 HPC Facilities . 5 New areas of UGAMP science 7 Chemistry-climate interactions . 19 Climate variability and predictability . 32 Atmospheric Composition . 48 Tropospheric chemistry and aerosols . 58 Climate Dynamics . 64 Model development . 72 Group News . 78 (for full contents see listing on the inside back cover) NERC Centres for Atmospheric Science, NCAS Alan Thorpe ([email protected]): Director NCAS Since the last UGAMP Newsletter there have been a significant number of NCAS developments relevant to the UK atmospheric science community. These include the following, which are particularly pertinent to the UGAMP community: • NERC have agreed to fund a new directed (new name for thematic) programme called “Surface Ocean – Lower Atmosphere Study” or SOLAS for short. • NERC have agreed to fund a “pump-priming” activity for a proposed new directed programme called Flood Risk from Extreme Events, FREE. The full proposal for FREE will be considered by NERC early in 2004. •NCAS is supporting a project to develop a new chemistry module for the HadGEM model. This is called UK-CHEM and Olaf Morgenstern at ACMSU is collaborating closely with the Hadley Centre on the project. •NCAS is supporting a project to develop the science for a new aerosol module for HadGEM.
    [Show full text]
  • ECON Thesaurus on Brexit
    STUDY Requested by the ECON Committee ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Authors: Stephanie Honnefelder, Doris Kolassa, Sophia Gernert, Roberto Silvestri Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union July 2017 EN DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT A: ECONOMIC AND SCIENTIFIC POLICY ECON Thesaurus on Brexit Fourth edition Abstract This thesaurus is a collection of ECON related articles, papers and studies on the possible withdrawal of the UK from the EU. Recent literature from various sources is categorised, chronologically listed – while keeping the content of previous editions - and briefly summarised. To facilitate the use of this tool and to allow an easy access, certain documents may appear in more than one category. The thesaurus is non-exhaustive and may be updated. This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the ECON Committee. IP/A/ECON/2017-15 July 2017 PE 607.326 EN This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. AUTHORS Stephanie HONNEFELDER Doris KOLASSA Sophia GERNERT, trainee Roberto SILVESTRI, trainee RESPONSIBLE ADMINISTRATOR Stephanie HONNEFELDER Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies
    [Show full text]
  • The Climategate Inquiries
    T HE CLIMATEGATE INQUIRIES by Andrew Montford SPPI REPRINT SERIES ♦ September 15, 2010 The Climategate Inquiries Andrew Montford Foreword by Lord Turnbull The Global Warming Policy Foundation GWPF Report 1 The Climategate Inquiries The Climategate Inquiries Andrew Montford Foreword by Lord Turnbull We have to take a self-critical view of what happened. Nothing ought to be swept under the carpet. Some of the inquiries – like in the UK – did exactly the latter. They blew an opportunity to restore trust.1 --Hans von Storch, Professor of Climatology, 2 August 2010 ISBN No. 978-1-906996-26-0 © Copyright 2010, The Global Warming Policy Foundation London SW1Y 5DB, September 2010 1 Von Storch, H. Wir müssen die Herausforderung durch die Skeptiker annehmen. Interview with Daniel Lingenhöhl, Handelsblatt, 2 August 2010. 1 CONTENTS Foreword by Lord Turnbull 3 Summary and Conclusions 6 Part I Introduction 8 Part II The Parliamentary Inquiry 12 Part III The Oxburgh Panel 25 Part IV The Climate Change Emails Review 36 Part V The Penn State Inquiry 50 About the author Andrew Montford is the author of The Hockey Stick Illusion: Climategate and the Corruption of Science (2008), a history of some of the events leading up to the release of emails and data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. He writes a blog specialising in climate change issues at http://bishop-hill.net and has made many media appearances discussing global warming from a sceptic perspective. Lord Turnbull Andrew Turnbull was Permanent Secretary, Environment Department,1994-98; Permanent Secretary to the Treasury 1998-2002, Cabinet Secretary and Head of the Home Civil Service 2002-05.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disclosure of Climate Data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia
    House of Commons Science and Technology Committee The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia Eighth Report of Session 2009–10 Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 24 March 2010 HC 387-I Published on 31 March 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Government Office for Science. Under arrangements agreed by the House on 25 June 2009 the Science and Technology Committee was established on 1 October 2009 with the same membership and Chairman as the former Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee and its proceedings were deemed to have been in respect of the Science and Technology Committee. Current membership Mr Phil Willis (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough)(Chair) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Tim Boswell (Conservative, Daventry) Mr Ian Cawsey (Labour, Brigg & Goole) Mrs Nadine Dorries (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Dr Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon (Labour, Bolton South East) Mr Gordon Marsden (Labour, Blackpool South) Dr Doug Naysmith (Labour, Bristol North West) Dr Bob Spink (Independent, Castle Point) Ian Stewart (Labour, Eccles) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester, Blackley) Dr Desmond Turner (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Mr Rob Wilson (Conservative, Reading East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152.
    [Show full text]
  • December 12, 2015
    The Week That Was: 2015-12-12 (December 12, 2015) Brought to You by SEPP (www.SEPP.org) The Science and Environmental Policy Project ################################################### Quote of the Week: “The prudent man always studies seriously and earnestly to understand whatever he professes to understand, and not merely to persuade other people that he understands it; and though his talents may not always be very brilliant, they are always perfectly genuine. He neither endeavours to impose upon you by the cunning devices of an artful impostor, nor by the arrogant airs of an assuming pedant, nor by the confident assertions of a superficial and impudent pretender.” Adam Smith The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759) ################################################### Number of the Week: 3 Times and 4 Times ################################################### Dear Subscriber to The Week That Was, As you know, support for the Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP) comes entirely from private donations; we do not solicit support from industry or government. Therefore, we can honestly claim that we are not beholden to anyone and that our writings are clear from any outside influence. We are also proud of the fact that SEPP is frugal: no fancy offices, no employees, no salaries paid to anyone; in fact, we donate book royalties and lecture fees to SEPP. The past few years have been very productive: In collaboration with like-minded groups, we produced hard-hitting comments for the record and provided scientific testimony on proposed Federal climate and energy policy. We expect this material to surface in future litigation over excessive regulation. In 2016, we plan to be very active in upcoming litigation over Federal regulations that are not supported by empirical science.
    [Show full text]
  • INFLUENCERS on BREXIT Who Is Most Influential on Brexit?
    INFLUENCERS ON BREXIT Who is most influential on Brexit? 1= 1= 3 4 5 Theresa MAY Angela MERKEL Nicola STURGEON Michel BARNIER Donald TUSK Chief Negotiator for the Prime Minister Federal Chancellor First Minister Commission Taskforce on Brexit President Negotiations UK Government German Government Scottish Government European Commission European Council 6 7 8 9 10 François HOLLANDE Philip HAMMOND David DAVIS Jean-Claude JUNCKER Guy VERHOFSTADT Secretary of State for Exiting the President Chancellor of the Exchequer President MEP & Lead rapporteur on Brexit European Union French Government UK Government UK Government European Commission European Parliament 11 12 13 14 15 Didier SEEUWS Enda KENNY Hilary BENN Mark RUTTE Martin SELMAYR Head of the General Secretariat of Chair, Committee on Exiting the Head of Cabinet of the President the Council Special Taskforce on Taoiseach European Union & Member of Prime Minister of the European Commission the UK Parliament, Labour Council of the EU Irish Government UK Parliament Dutch Government European Commission 16 17 18 19 20 Keir STARMER Donald TRUMP Wolfgang SCHÄUBLE Liam FOX Frans TIMMERMANS Secretary of State for Shadow Brexit Secretary US President-Elect Finance Minister First Vice-President Member of Parliament, Labour International Trade UK Parliament US Goverment German Government UK Government European Commission 21 22 23 24 25 Boris JOHNSON Nigel FARAGE Nick TIMOTHY Uwe CORSEPIUS Paul DACRE Joint Number 10 Special Adviser on Europe to Foreign Secretary MEP, Interim Leader of UKIP Chief-of-Staff,
    [Show full text]
  • The Disclosure of Climate Data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia
    House of Commons Science and Technology Committee The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia Eighth Report of Session 2009–10 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 24 March 2010 HC 387-II Published on 31 March 2010 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Science and Technology Committee The Science and Technology Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Government Office for Science. Under arrangements agreed by the House on 25 June 2009 the Science and Technology Committee was established on 1 October 2009 with the same membership and Chairman as the former Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee and its proceedings were deemed to have been in respect of the Science and Technology Committee. Current membership Mr Phil Willis (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough)(Chair) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Tim Boswell (Conservative, Daventry) Mr Ian Cawsey (Labour, Brigg & Goole) Mrs Nadine Dorries (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Dr Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon (Labour, Bolton South East) Mr Gordon Marsden (Labour, Blackpool South) Dr Doug Naysmith (Labour, Bristol North West) Dr Bob Spink (Independent, Castle Point) Ian Stewart (Labour, Eccles) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester, Blackley) Dr Desmond Turner (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Mr Rob Wilson (Conservative, Reading East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Scepticism: a Transnational Ecocritical Analysis
    Garrard, Greg. "Climate Scepticism in the UK." Climate Change Scepticism: A Transnational Ecocritical Analysis. By Greg GarrardAxel GoodbodyGeorge HandleyStephanie Posthumus. London,: Bloomsbury Academic, 2019. 41–90. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 26 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350057050.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 26 September 2021, 23:43 UTC. Copyright © Greg Garrard, George Handley, Axel Goodbody and Stephanie Posthumus 2019. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 2 Climate Scepticism in the UK Greg Garrard Before embarking on a detailed analysis of sceptical British texts, I will provide some historical and scholarly context. There have been many studies of anti- environmentalism in the United States (Helvarg; Brick; Ehrlich and Ehrlich; Switzer) and one on the global ‘backlash’ (Rowell), but none focuses exclusively on the UK. The sole treatment of anti-environmentalism within ecocriticism comes from the United States (Buell), just like the various exposés of climate scepticism discussed in the Introduction. As this chapter will show, British climate scepticism is possessed of a prehistory and some distinctive local features that reward closer inspection. Nevertheless, the Anglo-American axis of organized anti-environmentalism is obvious: British climate sceptics such as Christopher Monckton, James Delingpole and Nigel Lawson are darlings of the American conservative think tanks (CTTs) that promulgate sceptical perspectives, while Martin Durkin’s The Great Global Warming Swindle (2007), a British documentary shown on Channel 4, includes interviews with Richard Lindzen, Patrick Michaels and Fred Singer, all prominent American sceptics.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3: Process Issues Raised by Petitioners
    EPA’s Response to the Petitions to Reconsider the Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act Volume 3: Process Issues Raised by Petitioners U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Atmospheric Programs Climate Change Division Washington, D.C. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3.0 Process Issues Raised by Petitioners............................................................................................5 3.1 Approaches and Processes Used to Develop the Scientific Support for the Findings............................................................................................................................5 3.1.1 Overview..............................................................................................................5 3.1.2 Issues Regarding Consideration of the CRU E-mails..........................................6 3.1.3 Assessment of Issues Raised in Public Comments and Re-Raised in Petitions for Reconsideration...............................................................................7 3.1.4 Summary............................................................................................................19 3.2 Response to Claims That the Assessments by the USGCRP and NRC Are Not Separate and Independent Assessments.........................................................................20 3.2.1 Overview............................................................................................................20 3.2.2 EPA’s Response to Petitioners’
    [Show full text]
  • View / Open Q&A for Climate Skeptics.Pdf
    Q & A FOR CLIMATE SKEPTICS Answers to the Most Frequently Stated Concerns Edited by the Climate Leadership Initiative Institute for a Sustainable Environment University of Oregon 541-746-0786 Http://climlead.uoregon.edu Background and Table of Contents Most of the information in this document is edited from: "How to Talk to a Climate Skeptic" a series by Coby Beck containing responses to the most common arguments opposing a belief in or action to resolve global warming. There are five parts. Each includes numerous objections heard by skeptics followed by answers to them. Responses will appear under multiple headings and may even appear in multiple subcategories in the same heading. 1. Climate Change is Not Real or Confirmed……………………………………..Page 1 2. We Don't Know Why It's Happening…………………………….……………. Page 31 3. Climate Change Is Natural…………………………………………………….. Page 39 4. Climate Change Is Not Bad……………………………………………………. Page 50 5. Climate Change Can't be Stopped (or Its Too Costly to Stop It)……………… Page 51 1. CLIMATE CHANGE IS NOT REAL OR CONFIRMED a. Inadequate evidence Objection: Despite what the computer models tell us, there is actually no evidence of significant global warming. Answer: Global warming is not an output of computer models; it is a conclusion based on observations of a great many global indicators. By far the most straightforward evidence is the actual surface temperature record. While there are places -- in England, for example -- that have records going back several centuries, the two major global temperature analyses can only go back around 150 years due to their requirements for both quantity and distribution of temperature recording stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Gazette 2018 7
    GazetteWadham College 2018 2018 Gazette 2018 7 Contents Fellows' List 4 Features The Editor 8 The Warden 9 Wadham in 1618 67 The Domestic Bursar 12 Betjeman and Bowra 70 Staff List 14 The Remarkable Mrs Wadham (Senior) 73 The Finance Bursar 18 The 2nd Year 76 The Development Director 20 Book Reviews 78 The Senior Tutor 24 The Tutor for Access 26 College Record The Chapel and Choir 28 In Memoriam 86 The Sarah Lawrence Programme 30 Obituaries 88 The Library 32 Fellows' news 106 Emeritus Fellows' news 110 Clubs, Societies New Fellows 110 and Activities Visiting Fellows 113 1610 Society 36 Alumni news 115 Wadham Alumni Society 38 Degrees 118 Law Society 42 Donations 120 Medical Society 43 The Academic Record Wadham Alumni Golf Society 44 The Student Union 45 Graduate completions 140 MCR 46 Final Honour School results 143 Lennard Bequest Reading Party 48 First Public Examination results 145 Sports Prizes 147 Cricket 50 Scholarships and Exhibitions 149 Football 52 New Undergraduates 152 Rowing 54 New Graduates 156 Rugby 57 2019 Events 160 Netball 58 Squash 60 Tennis 60 Hockey 61 Water polo 62 Power lifting 62 www.wadham.ox.ac.uk Fellows’ list 5 Darren J. Dixon Thomas W. Simpson Samuel J. Williams Fellows’ list Professor of Organic Senior Research Fellow in Wadham College Law Chemistry, Knowles–Williams Philosophy and Public Policy Society Fellow by Special Fellow and Tutor in Organic and Senior Treasurer of Election Philip Candelas, FRS Martin G. Bureau Chemistry Amalgamated Clubs WARDEN Judy Z. Stephenson Rouse Ball Professor of Professor of Astrophysics Nathalie Seddon Susan M.
    [Show full text]