Distribution and Phenological Data of Some Bird Species of Uganda

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Ornis Hungarica 2013. 21(1): 41–57. doi: 10.2478/orhu-2013-0015 Distribution and phenological data of some bird species of Uganda ATTILA BANKOVICS1, JÁNOS TÖRÖK2, GÁBOR MICHL2, PÉTER PÉCZELY3 & Tibor Csörgő4 Attila Bankovics, János Török, Gábor Michl, Péter Péczely & Tibor Csörgő 2013. Distribution and phenological data of some bird species of Uganda. – Ornis Hungarica 21(1): 41–57. Abstract During a twenty five days trip in Uganda a brief faunistic survey of birds, mammals and reptiles was performed. Altogether 380 bird species were observed in six National Parks and some other protected areas in the summer of 2012. From these 64 bird species are discussed here selected according the following criteria: rarity, occurrence in a new habitat or geographic area, and emergence of novel breeding phenological data of certain species. Our new records of House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) along the Kazinga Channel (between Lake Edward and Lake George) are outside the current distribution range of the spe- cies. The House sparrow expanded its area about 800 km toward west from their first record in Nairobi in 1992. Our new records on White-tailed Ant-thrush (Neocossyphus poensis), Red-tailed Ant-thrush (Neocossyphus ru- fus), Papyrus Yellow Warbler (Chloropeta gracilirostris), Shelley’s Rufous Sparrow (Passer shelley) and Streaky Seedeater (Serinus striolatus) also require the correction of distribution maps of this species in Uganda. In addi- tion we give some remarks on the breeding phenology of Mountain Wagtail (Motacilla clara), Cassin’s Grey Fly- catcher (Muscicapa cassini) and Northern Red Bishop (Euplectes franciscanus). Our recent observational data of African Skimmer (Rynchops flavirostris) may have importance for the Bonn Convention. These observations might be important from conservation and ecotouristic point of views. Keywords: ecotourism, conservation, global conventions, rainforest, savannah Összefoglalás 2012. július 11. és augusztus 4.-e között 25 napot töltöttünk el Ugandában madarak, hüllők és em- lősök megfigyelésével. Utunk során hat nemzeti parkot és számos egyéb védett területet kerestünk fel, összesen 380 madárfajt észleltünk. Közülük 64 fajt válogattunk ki, melyek előfordulási és viselkedési adatainak közzété- tele érdeklődésre tarthat számot különféle szempontok, mint a természetvédelem, ökoturizmus, költésbiológia alapján, vagy az elterjedési területük változása miatt. A házi veréb (Passer domesticus) kelet-afrikai terjeszkedése során mintegy 10 éve érte el Ugandát, ezért a Kazinga-csatorna melletti megfigyelés jelentős új adatnak számít. További új előfordulási adatok a fehérfarkú hangyarigó (Neocossyphus poensis), a vörösfarkú hangyarigó (Neo- cossyphus rufus), a papirusz poszáta (Chloropeta gracilirostris), a nílusi veréb (Passer shelley), a csíkos csicsör- ke (Serinus striolatus) vonatkozásában születtek. Költésbiológiai adatokat közlünk a pataki billegető (Motacilla clara), a cassin-légykapó (Muscicapa cassini) és a tűzhátú szövőmadár (Euplectes franciscanus) vonatkozásá- ban. A részleges vonuló afrikai ollóscsőrűmadár (Rynchops flavirostris) előfordulási adata érdekes lehet a Bon- ni Egyezmény szempontjából. Kulcsszavak: ökoturizmus, természetvédelem, globális egyezmények, esőerdő, szavanna 1 Bird Collection, Hungarian Natural History Museum, 1088 Budapest, Baross utca 13., Hungary, e-mail: attila. [email protected] 2 Department of Systematic Zoology and Ecology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Pázmány Péter sé- tány 1/c, Hungary 3 2230 Gyömrő, Köztársaság utca 27., Hungary 4 Department of Anatomy, Cell- and Developmental Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, Hungary, e-mail: [email protected] Bereitgestellt von | University of Pittsburgh Angemeldet | 132.174.255.116 Heruntergeladen am | 29.06.14 20:55 42 ORNIS HUNGARICA 2013. 21(1) Introduction and other protected areas between 11 July and 4 August 2012. In this paper we discuss There is a contradiction between the devel- the occurrence data of 64 bird species be- opment of economy in African countries and longing to 33 families. the conservation of wildlife outside protected The 64 birds were selected according the areas in general. As a consequence of fast hu- following criteria: man population growth more and more natu- a) The species was found outside its known ral areas are occupied by proliferating human distribution area published in different settlements and have to be converted into ag- field-guides. That means unpublished oc- ricultural lands. As a result of these chang- currences. We have to mention, that in es, the ancient free areas for wildlife habitats some cases our local guides has already are shrinking continuously. The fragmenta- known about these occurrences. These tion of natural lands led to habitat loss and information are important to update the population decline of many African bird spe- distribution borders of these species. cies (Dranzoa 1998). Some articles even deal b) Our records give or confirm phenologi- with the collapse of avifauna in certain forest cal data of certain species regarding its fragments (Beier et al. 2002). breeding biology, behaviour, moulting or These problems are especially severe in its migration. smaller countries with high density of hu- c) The record of certain species might have man population like Uganda, where there is interest for global conservation agree- a great demand to enlarge the size of differ- ments like Ramsar Convention or AEWA ent plantations (tea, banana, sugarcane etc.) (African – Eurasian Waterbird Agree- in the proximity of rainforests. Unfortunate- ment) under the Bonn Convention. ly, there is also a forestry practice to change d) The species may be interesting for eco- natural forests into tree plantations, and as tourism and hence is important for the a consequence very strange landscapes with economy of Uganda. Our paper gives da- artificial conifer ʽforests’ are created (the ta on the occurrence, habitats, habitat use neighborhood of Budongo Forest). The re- and detectability of these target species. sults of deforestation and these unsustaina- e) It is worth to publish the data just be- ble silvicultural practices also lead to loss cause of the rarity of the species or sub- of the biological diversity (Dranzoa 1998). species. The aim of this paper is double. First, we would like to draw attention to the new oc- currences of some bird species including an Visited areas interesting record for Uganda avifauna. Sec- ond, we present some interesting breeding We would like to give a short description of phenological data of some bird species. the visited areas from geographical and con- servation point of view. The introduction follows the chronology of the trip. Materials and methods Entebbe Botanical Garden – Old estab- We spent 25 days with birding in Uganda lishment inside the town at the shore of visiting some national parks, nature reserves Lake Victoria. Bereitgestellt von | University of Pittsburgh Angemeldet | 132.174.255.116 Heruntergeladen am | 29.06.14 20:55 A. Bankovics, J. Török, G. Michl, P. Péczely & T. Csörgő 43 Banana Village – Small bungalow hostel or the Ruwenzori Mountains and south of camping with a wide well-wooded yard Lake Albert along the Semuliki Riv- in Kidepo near Entebbe. er. Actually, it is part of the famous Itu- Mabamba Bay Papyrus Swamp – Large ri Rainforest ecosystems of DR Congo swampy area near Entebbe along the along the eastern bank of the Semuliki coast of Lake Victoria. It is an Impor- River. Its size is 220 km2. tant Bird Area (IBA) with 9 IBA trig- Ruwenzori National Park (area around) – ger species and belong to the Ramsar This park was established in 1991. It is sites of Uganda (http://www.ramsar.org/ situated in the Bundibugyo, the Kabarole cda/en/ramsar-documents-texts/main/ and the Kasese districts. Its area is 996 ramsar/1-31-38_4000_0__). km2, of which 70% exceeds an altitude Mpanga Forest – Hardwood rainforest near of 2500 m. The park is 120 km long and Mpigi west from Lake Victoria. Estab- 48 km wide. We visited two small parts lished in 1963. Area: 453 ha. of that huge area, first the Slope near the Mabira Forest – Hardwood rainforest be- Semuliki National Park in the Bundib- tween Kampala and Jinja. Well known ugyo district and secondly, the Foothills ecotourist attraction and lots of visitors in Kasese district. come here every year. It is an Important Semliki Wildlife Reserve – This savannah Bird Area with 82 IBA trigger species and wooded savannah region is situated (http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/site- in the Southern Lowland of Lake Albert, factsheet.php?id=7052). with an area some 540 km2. Victoria Nile in Jinja – This is the source of Kibale Forest National Park – It is a medi- the White Nile. We visited the first few um-altitude moist evergreen tropical for- kilometer of the river. est (Langdale-Brown et al. 1964). Locat- Lake Mburo National Park – Important ed South-east of Fort Portal. Area: 766 wildlife refuge protecting the southern km2. Its area consists in 77% of differ- savannah of the country. Its area: 370 ent type of forests. The remaining 23% km2. The wetlands are partly Ramsar of the area is covered by plantations, ex- sites and an Important Bird Area, with 12 otic conifers, grasslands and swamps. It trigger species (http://www.birdlife.org/ is an Important Bird Area with, 120 IBA datazone/sitefactsheet.php?id=7051). trigger species (http://www.birdlife.org/ Queen Elisabeth National Park – With its datazone/sitefactsheet.php?id=7046). area of 2056 km2
Recommended publications
  • Sierra Leone Rockfowl and Upper Guinea Specials 21St February to 7Th March 2022 (15 Days)

    Sierra Leone Rockfowl and Upper Guinea Specials 21St February to 7Th March 2022 (15 Days)

    Sierra Leone Rockfowl and Upper Guinea Specials 21st February to 7th March 2022 (15 days) White-necked Rockfowl by Adam Riley RBL Sierra Leone Itinerary 2 Sierra Leone is a core West African destination, offering visitors a diverse range of exciting Upper Guinea forest birds and mammals. Rockjumper pioneered this tour during reconnaissance trips in 2005 and then led three successful tours in the course of 2006; these being the first-ever birding tours to the country. Sierra Leone’s biologically rich rainforests support no less than 15 of the 16 Upper Guinea endemic bird species, including the fabled White-necked Rockfowl that will form the basis of our tour. Forest specialties abound and we will focus on finding the rare Gola Malimbe, Sierra Leone Prinia, Black-headed Rufous Warbler, Hartlaub’s Duck, Brown-cheeked Hornbill, Sharpe’s Apalis, Kemp’s Longbill, White-breasted Guineafowl and Red-cheeked Wattle-eye; while the wooded savannas are home to the stunning Emerald Starling, Crimson Seedcracker and Turati’s Boubou, to name but a few. THE TOUR AT A GLANCE… THE ITINERARY Day 1 Arrival in Freetown Day 2 Freetown and Western Peninsula Forest Reserve Day 3 Regent Forest and transfer to Tiwai Island Day 4 Tiwai Island Day 5 Tiwai Island to Kenema Day 6 Kenema to Lalehun and walk in to Gola North (Tourist Camp) Day 7 Gola North (Tourist Camp) Day 8 Gola North to Lalehun and transfer to Kenema Day 9 Kenema to Koidu Day 10 Koidu to Loma Mountains and walk to camp 1 Day 11 Loma Mountains – camp 1 Day 12 Loma Mountains – camp 1 to Koidu Day 13 Koidu to Makeni via Bumbuna area Day 14 Bumbuna area Day 15 Makeni to Lungi International airport and departure RBL Sierra Leone Itinerary 3 TOUR MAP… THE TOUR IN DETAIL… Day 1: Arrival in Freetown.
  • Lake Opeta Wetland System Ramsar Information Sheet

    Lake Opeta Wetland System Ramsar Information Sheet

    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7, as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the Conference of the Contracting Parties. Note for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Bureau. Compilers are strongly urged to provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of maps. LAKE OPETA WETLAND SYSTEM RAMSAR INFORMATION SHEET 1. Name and address of the RIS Compiler: Achilles Byaruhanga and Stephen Kigoolo NatureUganda Plot 83, Tufnel Drive, Kamwokya P. O Box 27034, Kampala - Uganda. Tel: 256 41 540719 Fax no: 256 41 533 528 E-mail: [email protected] 2. Date: 17 September 2005. 3. Country: The Republic of Uganda 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Lake Opeta Wetland System 5. Map of the Ramsar site: Hard copy: attached Digital (electronic) format: yes 6. Geographical coordinates: 34004" - 34024" E and 01033" - 01051" N,. 7. General Location: Lake Opeta and its surrounding swamps is located in north eastern Uganda, in four districts of Nakapiripirit (Namalu sub-county and Lorachat sub-county), Sironko (Bunambutye sub- county), Katakwi (Usuku county, Magoro sub-county) and Kumi (Kolir sub-county, Malera sub-county and Ongino sub-county). It is located 25 kms from Kumi town and the northern part borders a Wildlife Reserve, Pian-Upe Wildlife Reserve and Teso Community Reserve.
  • Comments on the Ornithology of Nigeria, Including Amendments to the National List

    Comments on the Ornithology of Nigeria, Including Amendments to the National List

    Robert J. Dowsett 154 Bull. B.O.C. 2015 135(2) Comments on the ornithology of Nigeria, including amendments to the national list by Robert J. Dowsett Received 16 December 2014 Summary.—This paper reviews the distribution of birds in Nigeria that were not treated in detail in the most recent national avifauna (Elgood et al. 1994). It clarifies certain range limits, and recommends the addition to the Nigerian list of four species (African Piculet Verreauxia africana, White-tailed Lark Mirafra albicauda, Western Black-headed Batis Batis erlangeri and Velvet-mantled Drongo Dicrurus modestus) and the deletion (in the absence of satisfactory documentation) of six others (Olive Ibis Bostrychia olivacea, Lesser Short-toed Lark Calandrella rufescens, Richard’s Pipit Anthus richardi, Little Grey Flycatcher Muscicapa epulata, Ussher’s Flycatcher M. ussheri and Rufous-winged Illadopsis Illadopsis rufescens). Recent research in West Africa has demonstrated the need to clarify the distributions of several bird species in Nigeria. I have re-examined much of the literature relating to the country, analysed the (largely unpublished) collection made by Boyd Alexander there in 1904–05 (in the Natural History Museum, Tring; NHMUK), and have reviewed the data available in the light of our own field work in Ghana (Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett 2014), Togo (Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett 2011a) and neighbouring Benin (Dowsett & Dowsett- Lemaire 2011, Dowsett-Lemaire & Dowsett 2009, 2010, 2011b). The northern or southern localities of species with limited ranges in Nigeria were not always detailed by Elgood et al. (1994), although such information is essential for understanding distribution patterns and future changes. For many Guineo-Congolian forest species their northern limit in West Africa lies on the escarpment of the Jos Plateau, especially Nindam Forest Reserve, Kagoro.
  • Ornithological Expedition to Southern Bénin, April 2011

    Ornithological Expedition to Southern Bénin, April 2011

    Ornithological expedition to southern Bénin, April 2011 Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire & Robert J. Dowsett Dowsett-Lemaire Misc. Report 80 (2011) Dowsett-Lemaire F. & Dowsett R.J. 2011. Ornithological expedition to southern Bénin, April 2011. Dowsett-Lemaire Miscellaneous Report 80: 16pp. Birds of southern Bénin -1- Dowsett-Lemaire Misc. Rep. 80 (2011) Ornithological expedition to southern Bénin, April 2011 by Françoise Dowsett-Lemaire & Robert J. Dowsett Résumé Ceci est notre deuxième visite au sud du Bénin, faisant suite à une première expédition pendant la saison sèche de 2009. Le mois d’avril 2011 a été partagé entre les forêts principales du sud (Lama, Niaouli), les forêts plus sèches ou forêts claires des Monts Kouffé et Tobé à l’ouest, les plaines marécageuses du Zou et du Sô, et la zone côtière (Pahou et Grand-Popo). Un séjour du 12 au 16 avril à la limite sud des Monts Kouffé et dans la zone protégée de Tobé (Bantè) a permis d’étendre l’aire de distribution de plusieurs espèces forestières ou de sa - vane, notamment du rare Aigle couronné Stephanoaetus coronatus (un ex. essayant de capturer un Daman des rochers sur le rocher de Tobé), du Râle perlé Sarothrura pulchra (un chanteur à Tobé, limite nord actuelle), de l’Oedicnème tachard Burhinus capensis (Tobé, limite sud actuelle), Malcoha à bec jaune Ceuthmochares aereus (Tobé & Kouffé, limite nord), Coucal à ventre blanc Centropus leucogaster (Tobé & Kouffé, limite nord), Grand-duc de Verreaux Bubo lacteus (Kouffé), Trogon narina Apaloderma narina (Kouffé), Calao rieur By - canistes
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda

    Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda

    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii

    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
  • Systematics of Zoothera Thrushes, and a Synthesis of True Thrush Molecular Systematic Relationships

    Systematics of Zoothera Thrushes, and a Synthesis of True Thrush Molecular Systematic Relationships

    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49 (2008) 377–381 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Short Communication Systematics of Zoothera thrushes, and a synthesis of true thrush molecular systematic relationships Gary Voelker a,*, John Klicka b a Department of Biology, University of Memphis, 3700 Walker Avenue, Memphis, TN 38152, USA b Barrick Museum of Natural History, Box 454012, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4504 Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, NV 89154-4012, USA 1. Introduction Questions regarding inter-specific relationships remain within both Catharus and Myadestes. At the inter-generic level, Klicka The true thrushes (Turdinae; Sibley and Monroe, 1990) are a et al. (2005) conducted analyses of true thrush relationships, using speciose lineage of songbirds, with a near-cosmopolitan distribu- the Sialia–Myadestes–Neocossyphus clade (hereafter referred to as tion. Following the systematic placement of true thrushes as a the ‘‘Sialia clade”) as the outgroup. While clearly a true thrush line- close relative of Old World flycatchers and chats (Muscicapinae) age, the Sialia clade is very divergent from other true thrush lin- by the DNA–DNA hybridization work of Sibley and Ahlquist eages. Homoplasy caused by the use of this divergent clade as a (1990), a number of molecular systematic studies have focused root could explain at least some of the as yet unresolved inter-gen- on various aspects of true thrush relationships. These studies have eric relationships within true thrushes. included phylogenetic assessments of genera membership in true Our main objective in this study is to use dense taxon sampling thrushes, assessments of relationships among and within true across true thrushes to resolve inter- and intra-generic relation- thrush genera, and the recognition of ‘‘new” species (Bowie et al., ships that remain unclear.
  • Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008

    Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008

    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS IN UGANDA Status and Trends 2008 NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2008 Compiled by: Michael Opige Odull and Achilles Byaruhanga Edited by: Ambrose R. B Mugisha and Julius Arinaitwe Map illustrations by: David Mushabe Graphic designs by: Some Graphics Ltd January 2009 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized without further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda (2009). Important Bird Areas in Uganda, Status and Trends 2008. Copyright © NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society About NatureUganda NatureUganda is a Non Governmental Organization working towards the conservation of species, sites and habitats not only for birds but other taxa too. It is the BirdLife partner in Uganda and a member of IUCN. The organization is involved in various research, conservation and advocacy work in many sites across the country. These three pillars are achieved through conservation projects, environmental education programmes and community involvement in conservation among others. All is aimed at promoting the understanding, appreciation and conservation of nature. For more information please contact: NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Plot 83 Tufnell Drive, Kamwokya. P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Email [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org DISCLAIMER This status report has been produced with financial assistance of the European Union (EuropeAid/ ENV/2007/132-278. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Birdlife International and can under no normal circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.
  • International Gorilla Conservation Programme Greater Virunga Transboundary Collaboration

    International Gorilla Conservation Programme Greater Virunga Transboundary Collaboration

    International Gorilla Conservation Programme Greater Virunga Transboundary Collaboration Anna Behm Masozera Email: [email protected] Phone: +250 782332280 (voice messages can be left at +1 802 999 4958) www.greatervirunga.org www.igcp.org Central Albertine Rift: Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda, and Uganda. Size: Mountain gorilla habitat = 796.4 km2 Protected Areas in the Greater Virunga Landscape = 11,826.7 km2 Page 1 of 6 Participants in coordinating the ongoing transboundary cooperation: National Government: • Ministry of Environment Nature Conservation, and Tourism (DRC) • Ministry of Trade and Industry (Rwanda) • Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities (Uganda) Local Government: • North Kivu Province and Orientale Province (DRC) • many Districts (Uganda and Rwanda) Protected area administration: • Institut Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature (DRC) • Rwanda Development Board (Rwanda) • Uganda Wildlife Authority (Uganda) International NGOs: • Wildlife Conservation Society • WWF • International Gorilla Conservation Programme (coalition of Fauna & Flora International and WWF) • Mountain Gorilla Veterinary Project/Gorilla Doctors, • Diane Fossey Gorilla Fund International Objectives: 1) To promote and coordinate conservation of biodiversity and related socio-cultural values within the Greater Virunga protected area network; 2) To develop strategies for collaborative management of biodiversity; 3) To promote and ensure coordinated planning, monitoring, and evaluation of implementation of transboundary conservation and development
  • Mechanisms of Evolutionary Change in Structural Plumage Coloration Among Bluebirds (Sialia Spp.)

    Mechanisms of Evolutionary Change in Structural Plumage Coloration Among Bluebirds (Sialia Spp.)

    J. R. Soc. Interface (2006) 3, 527–532 doi:10.1098/rsif.2006.0111 Published online 9 February 2006 Mechanisms of evolutionary change in structural plumage coloration among bluebirds (Sialia spp.) Matthew D. Shawkey1,*, Susan L. Balenger2, Geoffrey E. Hill1, L. Scott Johnson2, Amber J. Keyser1,† and Lynn Siefferman1,‡ 1Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 331 Funchess Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, USA 2Department of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA Combinations of microstructural and pigmentary components of barbs create the colour displays of feathers. It follows that evolutionary changes in colour displays must reflect changes in the underlying production mechanisms, but rarely have the mechanisms of feather colour evolution been studied. Among bluebirds in the genus Sialia, male rump colour varies among species from dark blue to light blue while breast colour varies from blue to rusty. We use spectrometry, transmission electron microscopy and Fourier analysis to identify the morphology responsible for these divergent colour displays. The morphology of blue rump barbs is similar among the three species, with an outer keratin cortex layer surrounding a medullary ‘spongy layer’ and a basal row of melanin granules. A spongy layer is also present in blue breast barbs of mountain bluebirds Sialia currucoides and in rusty breast barbs of western Sialia mexicana and eastern bluebirds Sialia sialis. In blue barbs melanin is basal to the spongy layer, but is not present in the outer cortex or spongy layer, while in rusty barbs, melanin is present only in the cortex. The placement of melanin in the cortex masks expression of structural blue, creating a rusty display.
  • Vote:022 Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities

    Vote:022 Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities

    Vote Performance Report Financial Year 2018/19 Vote:022 Ministry of Tourism, Wildlife and Antiquities QUARTER 4: Highlights of Vote Performance V1: Summary of Issues in Budget Execution Table V1.1: Overview of Vote Expenditures (UShs Billion) Approved Cashlimits Released Spent by % Budget % Budget % Releases Budget by End Q4 by End Q 4 End Q4 Released Spent Spent Recurrent Wage 2.086 1.043 2.086 1.989 100.0% 95.3% 95.3% Non Wage 7.259 3.621 6.775 6.765 93.3% 93.2% 99.9% Devt. GoU 6.082 2.783 5.470 5.470 89.9% 89.9% 100.0% Ext. Fin. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% GoU Total 15.426 7.447 14.330 14.224 92.9% 92.2% 99.3% Total GoU+Ext Fin 15.426 7.447 14.330 14.224 92.9% 92.2% 99.3% (MTEF) Arrears 0.364 0.364 0.364 0.364 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Total Budget 15.790 7.811 14.694 14.588 93.1% 92.4% 99.3% A.I.A Total 85.005 0.033 154.197 83.589 181.4% 98.3% 54.2% Grand Total 100.795 7.843 168.892 98.177 167.6% 97.4% 58.1% Total Vote Budget 100.431 7.479 168.528 97.813 167.8% 97.4% 58.0% Excluding Arrears Table V1.2: Releases and Expenditure by Program* Billion Uganda Shillings Approved Released Spent % Budget % Budget %Releases Budget Released Spent Spent Program: 1901 Tourism, Wildlife Conservation and 95.02 163.47 92.78 172.0% 97.6% 56.8% Museums Program: 1949 General Administration, Policy and Planning 5.41 5.06 5.04 93.5% 93.0% 99.5% Total for Vote 100.43 168.53 97.81 167.8% 97.4% 58.0% Matters to note in budget execution Although the approved budget for the Vote was Ushs 100.4 billion, a total of Ushs 168 billion was realized/released.
  • Uganda and the Nile Basin Initiative: Benefits of Cooperation

    Uganda and the Nile Basin Initiative: Benefits of Cooperation

    UGANDA INVESTMENT BENEFITS FROM THE NILE BASIN COOPERATION ONE OF THE FOUR (4) MODERN EQUIPPED SURVEILLANCE BOATS LEAF II PROVIDED TO THE D.R CONGO AND UGANDA FOR JOINT SURVEILLANCE OF TRANSBOUNDARY LAKES EDWARD AND ALBERT LEAF II SUPPLIED TWO (2) MODERN MOBILE WATER QUALITY LABARATORY VEHICLES NEW MBARARA SUBSTATION IN UGANDA CONSTRUCTED THROUGH INTERCONNECTION TO D.R CONGO AND UGANDA TO SUPPORT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT OF ELECTRIC GRIDS OF NILE EQUATORIAL LAKES COUNTRIES PROJECT NBI/NELSAP–CU, APRIL 2019 MIRAMA SUBSTATION IN UGANDA CONSTRUCTED THROUGH INTERCONNECTION OF ELECTRIC GRIDS OF NILE EQUATORIAL LAKES COUNTRIES PROJECT ABOUT THE NILE EQUATORIAL LAKES SubSIDIARY ACTION PROGRAM (NELSAP) The Nile Equatorial Lakes Subsidiary Action Program regional trans-boundary projects, which are at various levels of Coordination Unit (NELSAP-CU) headquartered in Kigali, Rwanda, preparation and implementation. NELSAP-CU mobilized is one of the two investment programs of the Nile Basin Initiative USD 557.107 million cumulative finance to-date for pre- (NBI), the other being the Eastern Nile Subsidiary Action Program investment programs of and additional USD 493.018 million for (ENSAP), headquartered in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia known as investment projects. Eastern Nile Technical Regional Office (ENTRO). Since 2014, NELSAP-CU has gained regional experience, NELSAP-CU was established in December 1999 by the Council of strengthened its capacity and emerged as a reliable regional Ministers for Water Affairs with a mission to “contribute to the institution