DOCSLIB.ORG

Letter Welsh/English

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Letter Welsh/English 10 November 2014 Enforcement Policy Welsh Language Commissioner Market Chambers 5-7 St Mary St Cardiff CF10 1AT Dear Commissioner, Enforcement Policy consultation Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your proposals for an enforcement policy for the Welsh Language Standards. This is a joint response from the General Chiropractic Council (GCC), General Dental Council (GDC), General Medical Council (GMC), General Optical Council (GOC), General Osteopathic Council (GOsC), General Pharmaceutical Council (GPhC), Health and Care Professions Council (HCPC), the Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) and the Professional Standards Authority (PSA) - please see Annex A for organisational descriptors Questions 1 Is the purpose of the draft Enforcement Policy clear enough? We accept that the Background and Introduction sections of the policy are clear. 2. Do you agree with the regulation principles which are noted in the draft Enforcement Policy? We accept that the Better Regulation principles are applicable and appropriate for the enforcement policy. However, it would be helpful to receive clarification about the use of external parties to collect information or take action on the Commissioner’s behalf (3.12). 3. Do you agree with the method the draft Enforcement Policy envisages using to deal with complaints and alleged failures to comply with a standard? Whilst we agree with the majority of sections 4 and 5 of the policy we request clarification of the following: 4.1 – ‘The Commissioner’s focus in dealing with complaints will be on trying to obtain a satisfactory resolution for the complainant’ - does the resolution need to satisfy the Commissioner, or the complainant? As it could be the case that an outcome of an investigation is reasonable and proportionate, but may not necessarily ‘satisfy’ the complainant. 4.5 We agree that an organisation should have an opportunity to respond to a complaint, prior to investigation by the Commissioner and suggest that the term ‘encourages’ be strengthened to say ‘required’. 4.6 & 4.11 It is unclear whether these sections contradict one another with reference to the 12 month limitation. 4.16 We consider that the 10 working day turnaround for a response, explanation and solution will not be reasonable and proportionate in many cases and that a considered response would be more advantageous than a rushed one. We also request clarification with regard to the criteria for extension. 4. Are the criteria in the draft Enforcement Policy, which the Commissioner will follow when making enforcement decisions, clear enough? We consider the criteria for making enforcement decisions to be clear. 5. Do you agree with what the draft Enforcement Policy says about the way the Commissioner envisages using her enforcement and penal powers? Clarification would be helpful in the following areas: 7.4 & 7.5 It would be helpful to understand the timelines for the Commissioner’s response to representations made by organisations. 7.10 The term ‘is likely to fail’ implies the Commissioner has foresight into the outcome of the organisational response; it would be helpful to understand what this might mean in practice. 7.16 The Commissioner’s right to enter without notice – it would be helpful to understand why a Commissioner may be compelled to do this. Examples of when it would not be reasonable and proportionate to provide notice to the organisation 2 concerned would also be useful, we would suggest that notice should always be provided. It would also be helpful to note if this applies to premises that are not based in Wales. 7.18 It would be helpful to provide examples of acts that the Commissioner may deem contempt of court. 8.3 & 8.9 It would be helpful to understand why an organisation that has not failed to comply may be issued with recommendations/advice, and if this is the case, what is the status/implication of the recommendation or advice? This should be in line with the standard itself and not seek to go further than the initial requirement. 8.10 & 8.11 With regard to timelines for action plans, we request that these are reasonable and proportionate to the scale and resource of the organisation. 8.16 – 8.18 With regard to the publication of reports or statements, it would be helpful to receive clarity on the mechanisms the Commissioner intends to utilise for publication e.g. Commissioner’s website, media, and to what extent publication will be proportionate to the breach of the standard. It would also be useful to have the same information for publication by organisation, with particular regard to what is deemed reasonable and proportionate for UK-wide organisations. 9.4 (i) The term ‘restore’ implies the organisation has previously been compliant, ‘ensure’ may be an appropriate alternative. 9.10 We suggest that the policy should be explicit that the enforcement of a civil penalty should be the last resort, once all other options have been exhausted. It would also be helpful to clarify the circumstances in which a civil penalty would be enforced. 10.5 (a) ‘A failure that has placed an individual at a disadvantage’ This is potentially wide ranging and vague in description, examples may help explain how this could be deemed a serious failure and what would be a reasonable and proportionate response. 10.13 A blanket imposition of the maximum fine does not appear to meet the principles of better regulation discussed in the policy. In addition, it is questioned whether the imposition of a maximum penalty as an absolute is lawful. 11.4 It would be helpful to understand the reasoning behind the choice of the 5 years’ timeline with regard to the county court application. 11.8 We propose that the relevant person should also have the opportunity to respond to allegations in this instance. 13. Will there be a timescale for adding or removing data from the enforcement register? 3 6. Is the explanation of various terms and phrases used in the draft Enforcement Policy clear enough? General comments on terminology: There is scope for confusion about the use of the term ‘person’ and male pronouns to describe and refer to an organisation, this could imply an individual is responsible for the specific breach of the standard and for rectifying it; this is particularly pertinent to references to dishonesty and contempt of court. The use of the word ‘failure’ could imply that an organisation has knowingly neglected the standards; however, it could be the case that an organisation has unintentionally not met the standards expected – ‘has not complied/did not comply’ is proposed as an appropriate alternative. The word ‘suspicion’, along with its legal connotations, also implies a mistrust or guilt. Similar concerns are raised about the word ‘dishonest’. Are these terms appropriate for the policy? 7. Any additional comments. Thank you for meeting with us earlier this year to discuss the standards investigations and your proposals for enforcement. However, there remains ambiguity about what the Commissioner will determine to be reasonable and proportionate for UK-wide organisations, with respect to both implementation and enforcement of the standards. Due to the number of questions raised about the consultation, we request a follow up meeting to address these and will be in touch with your office to arrange. We hope our comments on the policy are helpful and look forward to discussing with you in the near future. Yours sincerely, Rachel Podolak Welsh Affairs Officer Email: [email protected] Telephone: 029 2049 4948 4 Annex A The General Medical Council The General Medical Council (GMC) is an independent organisation that helps to protect patients and improve medical education and practice across the UK. We decide which doctors are qualified to work here and we oversee UK medical education and training. We set the standards that doctors need to follow, and make sure that they continue to meet these standards throughout their careers. We take action when we believe a doctor may be putting the safety of patients, or the public’s confidence in doctors, at risk. Every patient should receive a high standard of care. Our role is to help achieve that by working closely with doctors, their employers and patients, to make sure that the trust patients have in their doctors is fully justified. Professional Standards Authority The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care* promotes the health, safety and wellbeing of patients, service users and the public by raising standards of regulation and voluntary registration of people working in health and care. We are an independent body, accountable to the UK Parliament. We oversee the work of nine statutory bodies that regulate health professionals in the UK and social workers in England. We review the regulators’ performance and audit and scrutinise their decisions about whether people on their registers are fit to practise. We also set standards for organisations holding voluntary registers for people in unregulated health and care occupations and accredit those organisations that meet our standards. To encourage improvement we share good practice and knowledge, conduct research and introduce new ideas including our concept of right-touch regulation†. We monitor policy developments in the UK and internationally and provide advice * The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care was previously known as the Council for Healthcare Regulatory Excellence † Professional Standards Authority. 2010. Right-touch regulation. Available at http://www.professionalstandards.org.uk/policy-and-research/right-touch-regulation 5 to governments and others on matters relating to people working in health and care. We also undertake some international commissions to extend our understanding of regulation and to promote safety in the mobility of the health and care workforce. We are committed to being independent, impartial, fair, accessible and consistent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Guidance Restoration to Student Register
    Guidance Notes STUDENT RESTORATION Application Form To restore to the General Optical Council student register you need to do the following things: 1. Submit the electronic form: https://www.optical.org/en/Registration/Restoring_to_the_registers/students.cfm 2. Submit by email or post to us the Student Restoration Identification Form found on the webpage above. 3. Pay the invoice we issue for your restoration fee. If you have any questions Email [email protected] Write to 10 Old Bailey, London EC4M 7NG Telephone +44(0)20 7580 3898, option 1 Mon to Thurs 09.00-17.00, Fri 09.00- 16.45 Website www.optical.org Section 1 – Contact details Your full name, home town and practice address (if provided) will appear on the public register and may be available to third parties. We need you to provide an email address as this is how you will receive confirmation of your registration and other important communications from us. This is also how you will log into the MyGOC area of the website. On occasion we must send out communication by post. You must select whether your home or practice address will be our registered address for correspondence with you. It should be a reliable address so that important communications can reach you without delay. You must notify us of any changes to your address by using the MyGOC area on our website or in writing to [email protected]. You should also notify us of any change of name as soon as possible. You can do this by enclosing a certified photocopy of the change of name deed or marriage certificate.
    [Show full text]
  • Business Plan Cover
    Declarations guidance for bodies corporate How we consider information that applicants or registrants declare. November 2013 Contents Who is this document for? ............................................................................................ 3 About this document ..................................................................................................... 3 Section one: introduction .............................................................................................. 4 The GOC register ...................................................................................................... 4 Section two: information for those applying to join the GOC register .......................... 5 Business applicants ...................................................................................................... 5 Declarations relating to criminal or disciplinary investigations or outcomes ............ 6 Other information ...................................................................................................... 9 Section three: information for those applying to restore to the GOC register ............ 10 Body corporate applicants .......................................................................................... 10 Declarations relating to criminal or disciplinary investigations or outcomes .......... 11 Section four: information for those applying for retention on the GOC register ......... 15 Business applicants ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Check Your Optician Is Registered Gocpatientsbooklet1qx 5/8/10 11:30 Page 2
    GOCPatientsBooklet1QX 5/8/10 11:30 Page 1 Check your optician is registered GOCPatientsBooklet1QX 5/8/10 11:30 Page 2 This booklet tells you who we, the General Optical Council (GOC), are. It also tells you what we do and how our services can help you. About us We regulate opticians, students training to be opticians and optical businesses in the UK. There are currently around 23,500 optometrists, dispensing opticians, student opticians and optical businesses on our registers. Our powers come from the Opticians Act 1989. What do the different words mean? An optometrist is the person who tests your sight. They can also fit and supply glasses or contact lenses. A dispensing optician is the person who fits and supplies your glasses or contact lenses. Ophthalmologists and ophthalmic medical practitioners (OMPs) are medically-qualified doctors who specialise in eye conditions. They are also allowed to test your sight and fit and supply glasses and contact lenses. Ophthalmologists and OMPs are registered by the General Medical Council. In this booklet we describe optometrists and dispensing opticians as ‘opticians’. 2 We describe people who are registered with us as ‘registrants’. We use these terms to make it clearer for you. What is regulation? Regulators protect the public by: • restricting who can practise a profession; • making sure that their registrants are suitably qualified; and • making sure that their registrants are fit to practise safely. We are one of nine healthcare regulators in the UK. The other regulators are: • the General Chiropractic Council; • the General Dental Council; • the General Medical Council; • the General Osteopathic Council; • the Health Professions Council; • the Nursing and Midwifery Council; • the Pharmaceutical Society of Northern Ireland; and • the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.
    [Show full text]
  • High Level Principles for Good Practice in Remote Consultations and Prescribing
    High level principles for good practice in remote consultations and prescribing This information is for all healthcare professionals with prescribing responsibilities. It sets out the shared high level principles of good practice expected of everyone when consulting and or prescribing remotely from the patient. The principles are underpinned by existing standards and guidance from professional and system regulators. Healthcare professionals should continue to follow guidance from regulatory bodies and take clinical guidance into account in their decision making. This information is not clinical guidance or new guidance from regulatory bodies. These principles have been co-authored and agreed by a range of healthcare regulators and organisations (see Annex A) Safeguards for patients accessing healthcare remotely Remote consultations and prescribing provided online, over video-link or by phone can benefit patients1, save resources and help meet public demand for more convenient access to healthcare. However, there are potential patient safety risks, particularly where services aren’t linked to a patient’s NHS GP or regular healthcare provider, and where there may be limited access to a patient’s medical records. Issues include increased attempts to gain access to medicines which can cause serious harm and the need to ensure safe ongoing monitoring of those with long term conditions. Providers of remote services and the healthcare professionals they work with must be aware of these risks and be clear about their responsibilities for protecting patients. Patients can expect to have effective safeguards in place to protect them when they receive advice and treatment remotely. Safeguards are necessary whether the consultation happens in the context of a continuing treating relationship or is a one- off interaction between a patient and a healthcare professional.
    [Show full text]
  • A Better, Fairer System of Dental Regulation 2
    Shifting the balance: a better, fairer system of dental regulation 2 Good regulation starts ‘upstream’ with communications, engagement and learning; persuasion and influence; leadership, partnership and an expression of common goals 3 Contents Chair’s foreword 4 Introduction 6 1. Moving upstream 15 2. First tier complaints 34 3. Working with partners 45 4. Refocusing fitness to practise 51 Building on principles: news steps 59 Proposals for action 60 4 Chair’s foreword The GDC is seeking to open and stimulate a serious public debate on the future of dental regulation. In the development of the ideas contained here we have engaged extensively with many of the groups and individuals that have a stake in dental regulation: professionals and their representative bodies, patient groups, regulators, educators, policy makers and others. We will continue to build on this engagement over the coming months, ensuring that we reach patients and professionals across the United Kingdom (UK). We want to seek views from everyone with an interest in the regulation of dentistry. The public expects and depends on safe, effective dental care that puts patients first. We know that is what the overwhelming majority of the dentists and dental care professionals working across the UK aspire to, and succeed in, delivering. They are committed and hard-working professionals in whom the public rightly places its trust. However, there can be challenges to fulfilling those expectations, for a range of reasons. For example: • there may be tensions between what the patient
    [Show full text]
  • STUDENT TRANSFER Application
    Guidance Notes STUDENT TRANSFER Application To apply to transfer from the register of student dispensing opticians to the register of student optometrists or from the register of student optometrists to the register of student dispensing opticians you need to ensure you complete the online transfer form here: https://www.optical.org/en/Registration/Applying_for_registration/student- transfers.cfm There is no fee charged to transfer your student registration. If you have any questions Email [email protected] Write to General Optical Council, Registration Department,10 Old Bailey London EC4M 7NG Telephone +44 (0)20 7580 3898, option 1 Mon to Thu 09.00-17.00, Fri 09.00- 16.45 Website www.optical.org Section 1 – Transfer information Please indicate which register you would like to be transferred to. Provide the date that you recommenced your studies, having transferred courses. Section 2 – Current registration details Your full name, home town and practice address (as already recorded in your MyGOC account) will appear on the public register and may be available to third parties. We need you to confirm your email address as this is how you will continue to receive confirmation of your registration and other important communications from us. On occasion we must send out communication by post. You must ensure your MyGOC record has the correct address recorded. It should be a reliable address so that important communications can reach you without delay. You must notify us of any changes to your address or email by using the MyGOC area on our website or in writing to [email protected] You should also notify us of any change of name as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • GOC Consultation on the Registration Rules for Independent Prescribing
    PROPOSALS TO AMEND GENERAL OPTICAL COUNCIL RULES TO INTRODUCE INDEPENDENT PRESCRIBING OF MEDICINES FOR OPTOMETRISTS: A CONSULTATION Introduction 1. The General Optical Council (GOC) is consulting on proposals to amend its rules to enable optometrists to practise as independent prescribers of medicines.1 These changes would enable optometrists to have ‘independent prescribing’ listed as a specialty against their name in the register of optometrists and carry out activities as independent prescribers after successful completion of a course of study approved by GOC for that purpose. 2. The proposals relate to the requirements for gaining and retaining independent prescribing specialty status, as well as the requirement for restoring that status where an independent prescriber has either come off the register of optometrists or has ceased to maintain their specialty as an independent prescriber. Proposals on what should be required in relation to Continuing Education and Training (CET) have also been considered. 3. This document outlines the way in which GOC proposes to amend its rules to introduce independent prescribing for optometrists and the reasons for the amendments. Comments are invited on all aspects of the proposals. However, we have highlighted those areas where a response would be particularly welcomed. 4. This consultation remains open for six weeks, and responses should be sent no later than Wednesday 2nd January, 2008. A list of those who have been sent this consultation document is attached. However, this document will also be posted on GOC’s website, and GOC welcomes responses from any interested parties. If you are aware of any body or individual who you believe should be sent this document and who is not listed, please let us know and we will send them the document.
    [Show full text]
  • FULLY QUALIFIED RESTORATION Application Form
    Guidance Notes FULLY QUALIFIED RESTORATION Application form To re-join the GOC fully qualified register you need to do the following things: 1. Earn the required number of CET points 2. Submit the electronic restoration form: https://www.optical.org/en/Registration/Restoring_to_the_registers/full- registrants.cfm 3. Submit by email or post to us the Restoration Identification Form found on the webpage above. 4. Pay the invoice we issue for your restoration and annual retention fee If you have any questions Email [email protected] Write to General Optical Council, Registration Department,10 Old Bailey London EC4M 7NG Telephone +44 (0)20 7580 3898, option 1 Mon to Thu 09.00-17.00, Fri 09.00- 16.45 Website www.optical.org Section 1 – Contact details Your full name, home town and practice address (if provided) will appear on the public register and may be available to third parties. We need you to provide an email address as this is how you will receive confirmation of your restoration and other important communications from us. This is also how you will log into the MyGOC area of the website. On occasion we must send out communication by post. You must select whether your home or practice address will be our registered address for correspondence with you. It should be a reliable address so that important communications can reach you without delay. You must notify us of any changes to your address or email by using the MyGOC area on our website or in writing to [email protected]. You should also notify us of any change of name as soon as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • General Chiropractic Council Meeting Agenda 16 March 2021 at 10.00
    General Chiropractic Council Meeting Agenda 16 March 2021 at 10.00 Virtual Meeting (MS Teams) Declarations of interest: members are reminded that they are required to declare any direct or indirect pecuniary interest, or any non-pecuniary interest, in relation to any matters dealt with at this meeting. In accordance with Standing Orders, the Chair will rule on whether an interest is such as to prevent the member participating in the discussion or determination of the matter. Page Item Action Presenter Paper Time No Welcome, apologies and declarations of 1. Chair --- 10.00 interest CO210316-02 2 A. Council Minutes of 10 December 2020 2. To approve Chair 10.05 B. Matters Arising CO210316-02a 9 3. Chair’s Report To note Chair CO210316-03 10.10 11 4. Chief Executive & Registrar’s Report To note CER CO210316-04 10.15 14 To note 5. Fitness to Practise update and D of FtP CO210316-05 10:25 20 approve 6. Business Plan 2021 Performance Update To note PIO CO210316-06 10:35 48 Finance Update – Management Accounts to 7. To note D of CS CO210316-07 10:50 February 2021 62 Annual Reports D of FtP CO210316-08a 69 A. Annual Report from Fitness to Practise 8. To note D of FtP CO210316-08b 10:55 91 B. Annual Report from the Professional Conduct Committee Reg. Officer CO210316-08c C. Annual Report from Registrations 96 BREAK (10 mins) 11:15 9. GCC Registrant Survey 2020 Results To note D of Dev CO210316-09 11:25 112 10. GCC Strategic Risk Register To approve CER CO210316-10 11:50 116 GCC Equality, Diversity and Inclusion policy 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Review
    Annual review of performance 2017/18 General Optical Council About the Professional Standards Authority The Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care promotes the health, safety and wellbeing of patients, service users and the public by raising standards of regulation and voluntary registration of people working in health and care. We are an independent body, accountable to the UK Parliament. We oversee the work of nine statutory bodies that regulate health professionals in the UK and social workers in England. We review the regulators’ performance and audit and scrutinise their decisions about whether people on their registers are fit to practise. We also set standards for organisations holding voluntary registers for people in unregulated health and care occupations and accredit those organisations that meet our standards. To encourage improvement we share good practice and knowledge, conduct research and introduce new ideas including our concept of right-touch regulation. We monitor policy developments in the UK and internationally and provide advice to governments and others on matters relating to people working in health and care. We also undertake some international commissions to extend our understanding of regulation and to promote safety in the mobility of the health and care workforce. We are committed to being independent, impartial, fair, accessible and consistent. More information about our work and the approach we take is available at www.professionalstandards.org.uk. Contents 1. The annual performance review
    [Show full text]
  • For Fitness to Practise Committee Hearings And
    FOR FITNESS TO PRACTISE COMMITTEE HEARINGS AND INDICATIVE SANCTIONS GUIDANCE Contents Pages 1. Introduction 5 2. Types of registrant 5 Individual registrants 5 Student registrants 5 Business registrants 6 3. What this guidance is for? 7 4. Who this guidance is for? 7 5. Responsibility for decisions 7 6. Human rights 7 7. Equality and diversity 8 8. Our objective 8 9. Fitness to practise and what it means 8 10. The public interest 9 IMPAIRMENT 10 11. Definition of impaired fitness to practise (s13D(2-3)) 10 Registered individuals (including students) 10 Business registrants 10 12. Misconduct 11 13. Deficient professional performance 12 14. Health 12 Determining impairment 13 INTERIM ORDERS 14 15. Interim orders (s13L) 14 Interim order review determinations 16 Revocation of interim orders 16 1 Interim orders when a referral to the Committee has been terminated under Rule 16 17 FITNESS TO PRACTISE HEARINGS 18 16. The process 18 17. Private hearings 18 18. Bias 19 19. Proceeding in the absence of the registrant and adjournments 19 20. Evidence and the standard of proof 20 The application of the standard of proof 21 Admissibility of evidence 22 Hearsay 22 Vulnerable witnesses 23 21. Dishonesty 23 22. Mitigation 24 What counts as mitigation and when to take it into account? 24 The relevance of mitigating circumstances 25 Mitigating factors 25 Aggravating factors 26 Personal mitigation and testimonials 26 Absence of evidence 27 At what stage should the Committee receive personal mitigation and testimonials? 27 23. Decision making 28 Giving reasons in determinations 28 How detailed does a determination have to be? 28 Findings of fact 28 What makes a good determination? 29 2 24.
    [Show full text]
  • ESR): Draft Standards and Learning Outcomes
    PUBLIC C34(18) COUNCIL Education Strategic Review (ESR): Draft Standards and Learning Outcomes Meeting: 12 September 2018 Status: For decision Project Sponsor: Alistair Bridge (Director of Strategy) Project Board: SMT Paper Author: Alistair Bridge Project team: Ben Pearson, Philippa Mann, Marcus Dye, Roz Platt, Manori Izni- Muneer, Ross Price Council Champions: Clare Minchington, David Parkins and Selina Ullah Project Board: SMT Purpose 1. The purpose of the paper is to seek Council’s views on proposed new standards for education providers and proposed new learning outcomes, and to seek Council’s approval for us to consult publicly on the proposed standards and learning outcomes. Recommendations 2. Council are asked to: 2.1. provide views on the: 2.1.1. proposed new standards for education providers (annex one); 2.1.2. proposed new learning outcomes for optometrists (annex two), dispensing opticians (annex three); and contact lens opticians (annex four); 2.1.3. proposal that rather than develop our own learning outcomes for independent prescribers, we should adopt the Royal Pharmaceutical Council’s Competency Framework for all Prescribers (annex five); and 2.1.4. proposed new learning outcomes for fully-qualified practitioners undertaking Continuing Education and Training (CET) (annex six); 2.2. approve a public consultation on the proposed new standards and learning outcomes, subject to taking into account Council’s views and the further views of our Expert Advisory Group provided at the meeting on 10 September 2018; and 2.3. delegate authority to the Chair and Interim Chief Executive and Registrar to sign-off the revised versions of the standards and learning outcomes for consultation, together with an accompanying consultation document and draft impact assessment.
    [Show full text]