City of Chicago, Cook County, Illinois

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

City of Chicago, Cook County, Illinois Illinois Coastal Management Federal Consistency Review Project Site: Lincoln Yards – Dominick Street Bridge Chicago, IL 60607 Prepared On Behalf Of: Chicago Department of Transportation Division of Engineering Alloy Property Company, LLC and Fleet Portfolio, LLC c/o Sterling Bay Prepared By: 2IM Group, LLC 118 S. Clinton Street Suite 350 Chicago, IL 60661 June 2020 2IM Group, LLC 118 South Clinton Avenue Suite 350 Chicago, Illinois 60661 United States of America : 312-441-9554 f: 312-441-9558 www.2imgroup.com Federal Consistency Coordinator Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois Department of Natural Resources 160 N LaSalle Street #700 Chicago, IL 60601-3130 2IM Group, on behalf of the Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT), is initiating a federal consistency review with the Illinois Department of Natural Resources Coastal Management Program regarding construction of the proposed Dominick Street Bridge spanning the North Branch of the Chicago River. The Dominick Street bridge is being developed within the Lincoln Yards Development Project located in Chicago, Cook County, Illinois. Lincoln Yards is a proposed 53-acre development along the North Branch of the Chicago River. The development is split into Lincoln Yards North (north of the river) and Lincoln Yards South (south of the river). As a part of this development, existing Dominick Street will be extended from Webster Avenue to North Avenue. The Dominick Street Bridge will cross the North Branch of the Chicago River and connect Lincoln Yards North and South. The proposed structure is a single span arch bridge with abutments that are built outside the existing riverbanks and 100-yr floodplain and are setback at least 40 feet from the existing/proposed riverwall on the north and south edge of the river. The proposed activity complies with Illinois’ approved coastal management program and will be conducted in a manner consistent with such policies. Construction of the bridge is expected to begin in Q1 of 2021 and completed in Q3 of 2022. United States Coast Guard (USCG) permit application review is ongoing. See Attachment 1 for the USCG Bridge Permit Application. 2IM Group is authorized to act on behalf of CDOT per Attachment 2 within this package. Project Location: North Branch Chicago River near North Throop Street and West Willow Street, Chicago. Section 32, Township 40N, Range 14E Latitude: 41°54’56.8” N Longitude: 87°39’43.9” W See Attachment 3 for project vicinity and location maps. Please contact me if you require additional information. Thank you, Patrick Brugliera, EIT 2IM Group, LLC. T 312.441.9554 [email protected] CC: John Morgan, PE Luis Montgomery, PE Scott Wojteczko, PE, SE Luis Benitez, PE, SE Carlos del Val Cura Section 1B. Bridge Permit Application Lincoln Yards – USCG Bridge Permit Application TO: Mr. Michael Walker Bridge Management Specialist 9th Coast Guard District, United States Coast Guard (USCG) FROM: 2IM Group, LLC. on behalf of Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT) SUBJECT: Lincoln Yards – Proposed Dominick Street Bridge over North Branch of Chicago River Application Package DATE: May 8, 2020 Dear Sir: Application is hereby made for a Coast Guard bridge permit. A. ADMINISTRATIVE AND NAVIGATION INFORMATION 1. Application Date: 05/08/2020 a. Applicant information: Chicago Department of Transportation (CDOT) 1) Name: Mr. Luis Benitez, P.E., S.E., Chief Bridge Engineer 2) Address: 30 North LaSalle Street, Suite 400, Chicago, IL 60602 3) Telephone number: (312) 744-5807 4) Email address: [email protected] b. Consultant/Agent information (if employed): Alfred Benesch & Company (Benesch) 1) Name (company or individual): Scott Wojteczko, P.E., S.E., Project Manager 2) Address: 35 West Wacker Drive, Suite 3300, Chicago, IL 60601 3) Telephone number: (312) 565-0450 4) Email address: [email protected] 5) Letter authorizing a consultant/agent to obtain permits on behalf of the applicant included: Yes No c. Name of Proposed Bridge(s): Dominick Street Bridge Lincoln Yards – USCG Bridge Permit Application 1) Name of the waterway that the bridge(s) would cross: North Branch of the Chicago River 2) Number of miles above the mouth of the waterway where the bridge(s) would be located and provide latitude and longitude coordinates (degree/minute/second) at centerline of navigation channel (contact the local Coast Guard Bridge Office for guidance): The proposed Dominick Street Bridge is located over the North Branch of the Chicago River approximately 4.3 miles northwest of the mouth of the Main Branch of the Chicago River at the Chicago Harbor Lock at Lake Michigan. The centerline of the navigation channel at the proposed bridge location is at the following Latitude and Longitude, respectively: 41°54’56.8” N 87°39’43.9” W 3) City or town, county/parish, and state where the bridge(s) would be located at, near, or between: City of Chicago, Cook County, Illinois 4) Brief description of project to include type of bridge(s) proposed [fixed or movable (drawbridge, bascule, vertical lift, swing span, pontoon), highway, railway, pedestrian, pipeline] and existing bridge(s) at project site, if applicable: Lincoln Yards is a proposed 53-acre development along the North Branch of the Chicago River. The Lincoln Yards development is split into Lincoln Yards North (north of the river) and Lincoln Yards South (south of the river). As a part of this development, existing Dominick Street will be extended from Webster Avenue to North Avenue. The Dominick Street bridge will cross the North Branch of the Chicago River and connect Lincoln Yards North and South. The proposed structure type is a single span fixed arch bridge with abutments that are built outside the existing riverbanks and 100-yr floodplain. The abutments are setback a minimum of 40 feet from the existing/proposed riverwalls on the north and south edge of the river. The bridge will support vehicular and pedestrian traffic. There is no existing bridge at the proposed bridge location. 5) Drawbridge Regulations (if applicable): Not Applicable 6) Date of plans and number of plan sheets: 05/04/2020 (4 sheets) Lincoln Yards – USCG Bridge Permit Application 7) Estimated cost of bridge(s) and approaches: $30M a) Provide the estimated cost of the bridge(s) as proposed, with vertical and horizontal navigational clearances: $30M b) Provide the estimated cost of a low-level bridge(s) on the same alignment with only sufficient clearance to pass high water while meeting the intended purpose and need: A low-level bridge is not feasible due to the requirements of the proposed development and also the inability of this bridge type to meet the reasonable needs of navigation on the river. An estimated cost of a low-level bridge was therefore not explored. a) Type and source of project funding (federal, state, private, etc.): Project will be funded via private development, in combination with the City of Chicago’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) program. 8) Proposed project timeline: a) Preliminary project schedule as follows: i. Design: ongoing, targeted completion in Q4 of 2020 ii. Construction: anticipated start in Q1 of 2021, complete in Q3 of 2022 9) Other Federal actions (e.g., permits, approvals, funding, etc.) associated with the proposal: US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Section 408 permission. d. Legal authority for proposed action: 1) Cite appropriate Bridge Act: General Bridge Act of 1946 2) If not the owner of the existing bridge(s) that is being replaced or modified, include a signed statement from the bridge owner authorizing the removal or modification work and cite its location: Not Applicable 3) For privately owned bridges, cite authorization for right to build (e.g. deed or easement from the property owner authorizing the proposed construction or modification work): Not Applicable e. International bridges (if applicable): Not Applicable 1) Cite the International Bridge Act of 1972, or a copy of the Special Act of Congress if constructed prior to 1972, as the legislative authority for international bridge construction: Not Applicable Lincoln Yards – USCG Bridge Permit Application 2) For permits issued under the International Bridge Act of 1972, cite Presidential approval, via the State Department, included with the application as required: Not Applicable f. Dimensions of the proposed bridge(s): See bridge plan sheets included in Section 1C for additional details. 1) Vertical clearance as indicated on plan sheets: 18.5 ft minimum required vertical clearance over Low Water Datum (LWD) within navigation channel; 20.3 ft minimum provided. 2) Horizontal clearance as indicated on plan sheets: 150 ft minimum required horizontal clearance measured normal to centerline of channel; over 150 ft provided. 3) Length of bridge(s) project: 322 ft bridge length measured back-to-back of bridge abutments If no prior permit exists, and this is a modification or replacement project, is the length the same as the old bridge: Not Applicable If not, what is the difference: Not Applicable 4) Width of bridge(s) project: 80’ bridge deck width If no prior permit exists, and this is a modification or replacement project, is the width the same as the old bridge: Not Applicable If not, what is the difference: Not Applicable 5) Depth of the waterway at project site at MHW if tidal or OHW if non-tidal, using the appropriate elevation and datum (e.g., NGVD 1929, NAVD 1988, etc.): The depth of the waterway in the navigation channel varies from 6.3 ft minimum to 16.0 ft maximum (15.0 ft typical), measured from the Low Water Datum (LWD) elevation of 577.50 to the streambed elevation. The depth of the waterway at the north channel limit is 0 ft (i.e. existing bank) and at the south channel limit is approximately 15.0 ft (existing riverwall), measured from the LWD elevation of 577.50 to the streambed elevation.
Recommended publications
  • INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE ENGINEERING 6 Ccfonf Erence TH INTERNATIONAL Westin Copley Place, Boston BRIDGE ENGINEERING 6 Conference
    FINAL PROGRAM Reliability, Security, and Sustainability in Bridge Engineering July 17–20, 2005 Boston, Massachusetts THT INTERNATIONAL BRIDGE ENGINEERING 6 CCfonf erence TH INTERNATIONAL Westin Copley Place, Boston BRIDGE ENGINEERING 6 Conference Service Area Facilities Map Staffordshire D America North C B Foyer A Essex Essex Essex St. George North North North West Center East America Center Convention Office Foyer Escalators Essex Center Escalators Elevators Women America South Elevators Women Essex South Men Men Freight Elevator Freight Elevator America Ballroom, 4th floor Essex Ballroom, 3rd floor Adams Bar Pre- Parliament function Courier Daniel Webster North Star Pre- function Defender Prefunction Boardroom Elevators Nausett Bar Bar Men Women Flying Cloud Great Republic Conference Center, 7th floor Contents Committee for the 6th International TH INTERNATIONAL Bridge Engineering Conference.............................2 BRIDGE ENGINEERING Sponsors, Cosponsors, Financial Contributors, and Supporting Organizations .............................3 6 Conference Conference Welcomes .........................................5 Reliability, Security, and Sustainability in Bridge Engineering Mary Lou Ralls, Conference Chair . 5 July 17–20, 2005 John Horsley, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials . 5 Boston, Massachusetts J. Richard Capka, Federal Highway Administration . 6 General Information ...........................................7 Conference Venue . 8 Speaker Ready Room . 8 Spouse and Guest Hospitality Room .
    [Show full text]
  • Neighborhood News January / February 2010 1 Sheffield Neighborhood News
    Sheffield Neighborhood News January / February 2010 1 Sheffield Neighborhood News Published by the Sheffield Neighborhood Association www.sheffieldneighborhood.org January / February 2010 You’re invited to SNA’s 2010 Annual Meeting BY TED WROBLESKI Casey for Second Vice-President: Robert Birk- meyer for Assistant Treasurer; and Stephanie Join SNA he Sheffield Neighborhood Associa- Linebaugh for Secretary. tion will hold its 2010 annual general Directors: John Roberts and Tony Russo- for DePaul b-ball! membership meeting on Tuesday, manno, whose terms are expiring, are renomi- he Sheffield Neighborhood Association will February 2, 2010, at 7 pm at St. James nated for three-year terms expiring in 2013. again sponsor a Neighbor Day at the DePaul T University Lady Blue Demons basketball Lutheran Church, Fremont and Dickens. The The terms of Ted Wrobleski, Tim Glascott, and game on Saturday, February 6, at 7 pm. general membership meeting will be preceded Jeff Markowitz are also expiring. Tim and Jeff T Join us to see DePaul battle Villanova. We will by the regular monthly board meeting of the have indicated that they do not wish to con- provide complimentary tickets to the game, which Sheffield Board of Directors at 6 pm. Not only tinue to serve and Ted is being nominated for you may pick up at Kelly’s Pub. 949 W. Webster, on are you invited, but you are invited to bring an officer’s position. The nominees for these game day beginning at 6 pm, which are also the time a friend who is not a member to sign up as a vacancies are David Bassin, a resident on and place for our pizza party featuring complimen- SNA member.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Illinois Recordations Under HABS, HAER, HALS, HIBS, and HIER (As of April 2021)
    List of Illinois Recordations under HABS, HAER, HALS, HIBS, and HIER (as of April 2021) HABS = Historic American Buildings Survey HAER = Historic American Engineering Record HALS = Historic American Landscapes Survey HIBS = Historic Illinois Building Survey (also denotes the former Illinois Historic American Buildings Survey) HIER = Historic Illinois Engineering Record (also denotes the former Illinois Historic American Engineering Record) Adams County • Fall Creek Station vicinity, Fall Creek Bridge (HABS IL-267) • Meyer, Lock & Dam 20 Service Bridge Extension Removal (HIER) • Payson, Congregational Church, Park Drive & State Route 96 (HABS IL-265) • Payson, Congregational Church Parsonage (HABS IL-266) • Quincy, Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad, Freight Office, Second & Broadway Streets (HAER IL-10) • Quincy, Ernest M. Wood Office and Studio, 126 North Eighth Street (HABS IL-339) • Quincy, Governor John Wood House, 425 South Twelfth Street (HABS IL-188) • Quincy, Illinois Soldiers and Sailors’ Home (Illinois Veterans’ Home) (HIBS A-2012-1) • Quincy, Knoyer Farmhouse (HABS IL-246) • Quincy, Quincy Civic Center/Blocks 28 & 39 (HIBS A-1991-1) • Quincy, Quincy College, Francis Hall, 1800 College Avenue (HABS IL-1181) • Quincy, Quincy National Cemetery, Thirty-sixth and Maine Streets (HALS IL-5) • Quincy, St. Mary Hospital, 1415 Broadway (HIBS A-2017-1) • Quincy, Upper Mississippi River 9-Foot Channel Project, Lock & Dam No. 21 (HAER IL-30) • Quincy, Villa Kathrine, 532 Gardner Expressway (HABS IL-338) • Quincy, Washington Park (buildings), Maine, Fourth, Hampshire, & Fifth Streets (HABS IL-1122) Alexander County • Cairo, Cairo Bridge, spanning Ohio River (HAER IL-36) • Cairo, Peter T. Langan House (HABS IL-218) • Cairo, Store Building, 509 Commercial Avenue (HABS IL-25-21) • Fayville, Keating House, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area Illinois and Indiana
    Floods of October 1954 in the Chicago Area Illinois and Indiana By WARREN S. DANIELS and MALCOLM D. HALE FLOODS OF 1954 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1370-B Prepared in cooperation with the States of Illinois and Indiana UNITED STATES GOVE'RNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1958 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 35 cents PREFACE This report on the floods of October 1954 in the Chicago area, Illinois and Indiana, was prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, C. G. Paulsen, chief, under the general direction of J. V. B. Wells, chief, Surface Water Branch. Basic records of stage and discharge were collected in cooper­ ation with the following agencies: Illinois Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Waterways; Illinois Department of Registration and Education, Water Survey Division; Department of Highways, Cook County, Ill. Indiana Flood Control and Water Resources Commission; and Indiana Department of Conservation, Division of Water Resources. The flood profile data were furnished by the Illinois Division of Waterways and by the Corps of Engineers. The records of stage and discharge were collected and computed under the direction of J. H. Morgan, district engineer. Champaign, Ill .• and D. M. Corbett. district engineer. Indianapolis. Ind. The Illinois part of the report was prepared by W. S. Daniels. the Indiana part by M.D. Hale. each being assisted by personnel in his respective district. The short section on flood frequency was pre­ pared by the special studies unit of the Champaign district.
    [Show full text]
  • Sixth Biennial Symposium
    Heavy Movable Structures, Inc. SIXTH BIENNIAL SYMPOSIUM October 30 - November 1, 1996 Doubletree Resort Surfside Clearwater Beach, Florida The Selection and Evolution of the Chicago Type Trunnion Bascule Bridge, Historical Development of Movable Bridges, Part III by John A. Schultz Jr., S.E., Hazelet & Erdal SELECTION AND EVOLUTION OF THE CHICAGO TYPE TRUNNION BASCULE BRIDGES HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF MOVABLE BRIDGES, PART m Prepared for: 6th Biennial Symposium of Heavy Movable Structures, Inc. October 30 - November 1, 1996 Clearwater, Florida Prepared by: John A. Schultz, Jr., SE HAZELET & ERDAL A DAMES & MOORE COMPANY 547 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, Illinois 60661 All "Bascule Bridges" by definition, pivot about a horizontal axis to rotate one or more bridge leafs in a vertical plane, for the purpose of providing specified channel clearances, both horizontally and vertically for navigation. The trunnion type bascule bridges pivot about a fixed axis as the leafs rotates "open". PREFACE "Remember the Past to Inspire the Future; Historical Development of Movable Bridges" which was presented in 1994 will be reff-red to as Part I. "A Century of Progress, Scherzer Rolling - s Bascule Bridges; Historical Development of Movable Bridges, Part II pertains to another presentation being introduced this year. It relates the culirnination of events that precipitated the explosion of new developments +hatbegan in Chicago circa 1890. It will focus on the development of the Scherzer Rolling Lift Bascule Bridge including the special features that are being used on current projects. "The Selection and Evolution of the Chicago Type Trunnion Bascule Bridge"; Historicall Development of Movable Bridges, Part HI. This presentation will expand on the new developments that started circa 1890.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Transit Authority Circle Line Alternatives Analysis Study
    Chicago Transit Authority Circle Line Alternatives Analysis Study Screen Two Public Involvement Public Comments and Questions (Appendix) 12 February 2007 Comment No: 213 Topic Area: 4, 5, 6, 13 Received via: Email I attended the community meeting on Tuesday regarding the circle line. I was unable to stay for the entire question and answer session, so I apologize if these questions were addressed. I am concerned about the impact that a bus lane would have on Ashland and on North Avenue. If the bus alternative is considered, would it eliminate the parking on Ashland or the center plantings? On North Avenue a bus line would be unacceptable. We have waited 15 years for the new North Av. bridge to widen the street to 2 lanes as it crosses the river. Eliminating one of those lanes would make North Av more of a traffic nightmare than it is already. Is it feasible technically and financially to build connection down North avenue underground (under the river?) Above ground connection I believe will very adversely impact a very attractive and therefore desirable shopping destination by making it a dark cavern. The impact during construction of anything above ground would be unacceptable. I also question how the connection from Ogden and Division would be made to the North Av. redline station (or would it connect to the Division station instead?). Again the only plan that would not adversely impact the area/community is underground train lines. The area has finally started to have a pleasant streetscape which overhead rail lines would ruin f and bus lane going to that intersection (North & Clybourn) would be impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Ch I C a G O Ri V E R Co R R I D O R De V E L O P M E N T Pl
    C H I C A G O R I V E R C O R R I D O R D E V E L O P M E N T P L A N City of Chicago Richard M. Daley, Mayor Department of Planning and Development Christopher R. Hill, Commissioner 1999 Chicago River Corridor Development Plan C o n t e n t s FOREWORD 1 CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION Why a development plan for the Chicago River? 2 Chicago River Development Goals 4 Planning Process 6 CHAPTER TWO: THE PLAN Reaches and Opportunity Sites: 8 1. North Shore Channel 10 • Devon to Lawrence 12 • Bryn Mawr to Foster 14 2. Upper North Branch: City Limits to Cicero 16 3. Upper North Branch: Cicero to Lawrence 18 • Foster to Lawrence 20 4. Middle North Branch: Lawrence to Diversey 22 • Neighborhood Overlook Prototype - 1 24 • Neighborhood Overlook Prototype - 2 26 • Neighborhood River Edge Improvements Prototype 28 • Horner Park 30 • Irving Park to Addison 32 • Addison to Belmont 34 • Industrial Area Overlook 36 • Lathrop Riverwalk 38 5. Lower North Branch: Diversey to Chicago 40 • Damen to Fullerton 42 • Fullerton Plaza 44 • Union Pacific Railroad Bridge to Webster 46 • North Avenue Turning Basin 48 6. Downtown Main Branch: Chicago to Congress 50 • Erie Street Terraces 52 • North Branch Boardwalk 54 • Riverwalk Gateway 56 • Rush Street Park Improvements 58 • 300 South Wacker 60 • Wolf Point 62 7. South Branch Riverwalk: Congress to Halsted 64 8. South Branch: Halsted to Kedzie 66 • South Branch Turning Basin 68 • Canalport Riverwalk 70 9. Sanitary & Ship Canal: California to City Limits 72 CHAPTER THREE: IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Overview & Setback ordinance 74 Design Guidelines 76 Capital Improvement Program 78 Environmental Recommendations 79 Public/Private River Development Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • Halsted Triangle. the Planned with a Total of 1.3 Million Square Feet, the North Avenue and Development No
    General Street Recommendations 49 Table of Contents Typical Sections and Street Class Recommendations 50 Primary and Secondary Streets 50 Chapter 1: Introduction and vision...............................1 North Avenue 50 Halsted Street 52 Introduction and Vision 2 Clybourn Avenue 54 Outreach and Involvement 4 Kingsbury Street 56 Plan Development Process 4 Kingsbury Street (continued) 58 Plan Goals and Objectives 5 Class A Streets 60 Alleys 62 Chapter 2: Market Analysis......................................................7 Other Recommendations 64 Market Analysis 8 Socioeconomic Highlights 8 Chapter 6: Pedestrians, Bicycles, and Transit.........67 Employment 10 Pedestrians, Bicycles, and Transit 68 Retail Development 12 Sidewalks and Bikeways 70 Residential Development 14 Major Citywide Bicycle Initiatives 71 Industrial and Commercial Uses 16 CTA Bus Service 72 Institutional Uses 16 Rail Transit Service 72 Potential Redevelopment Sites 18 Future Transit Services 74 Summary of Market Conclusions 18 Recommendations 76 Option 1: Renovate and Enhance the Existing Station Chapter 3: Master Plan...........................................................21 (rehab and stabilize station) 78 The Master Plan 22 Option 2: Construct a New Station (standalone) 80 The Chicago River and the Industrial Corridor 22 The North Branch of the Chicago River and Goose Island 24 Chapter 7: Parking and Transportation demand Neighborhoods 24 Management...................................................................................83 Ogden Avenue 24 The Area’s
    [Show full text]
  • ("RFQ") Requisition No. 108189 Specification No. 133527 Package
    Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") for Professional Bridqe lnspection Enqineerinq Services Requisition No. 108189 Specification No. 133527 Required for use by: CITY OF CHICAGO (Department of Transportation) lssued by: CITY OF CHICAGO (Department of Procu rement Services) oNE (r) oRtctNAL AND THREE (3) COptES AND ONE (1) LABELED "REDACTED" CD.ROM OF THE RESPONSE TO BE SUBMITTED All of the responses must be addressed and returned to: Jamie L. Rhee, Chief Procurement Officer Department of Procurement Services City Hall-Bid & Bond-Room 103 121 N. LaSalle Street Chicago, lllinois 60602 Responses must be received no later than 4:00 p.m. Central Time, on May 2,2016 Responses must be submitted in sealed envelope(s) or packages(s). The outside of the package or envelope must clearly indicate the project description, "fu.]fess|ona!- Bridqe lnspection Enqineerinq Services" the requisition number and the time and the date specified for receipt, The name and address of the Respondent must also be clearly printed on the outside of the envelope(s) or package(s) RAHM EMANUEL JAMIE L. RHEE MAYOR CHIEF PROCUREMENT OFFICER Edward Anderson, Senior Procurement Specialist, (3'l2l 7 44-6118 Dnprnrn¡oNT oF PnocunBrupnr SnRvtcps CITY OF CHICAGO Dear Vendor: Under the leadership of Mayor Rahm Emanuel, the City continues to identify ways contractors can be good corporate citizens, enhance the City's business community, and improve small businesses' chances of being successful City contractors. The City has several bid incentives and programs designed to benefit local businesses, small businesses and utilization thereof, and reward corporate responsibility and community awareness, including bid incentives for apprentice utilization, city-based businesses, city-based manufacturers, project-area subcontractors, veteran/small business joint ventures, and the use of alternatively powered vehicles, as well as the diversity credit program.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Michigan
    348 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 6, Chapter 11 19 SEP 2021 Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 6—Chapter 11 86°W 84°W NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml ONTARIO 86°W MICHIGAN 14902 14908 14911 14915 Gladstone L A K Escanaba E H U R O 14909 N WISCONSIN Y 14881 A B N E 14902 Menominee E R 14912 G 14917 14942 45°N 14910 Sturgeon Bay GRAND TRAVERSE BAY 14918 14913 14919 14907 Green Bay 14903 6 14939 PORTAGE LAKE 1481 N 14938 Manitowoc A Manistee 14922 G Ludington I 14937 Sheboygan H L AKE WINNEBAGO 14922 C I MICHIGAN WHITE LAKE M 14935 Muskegon E 14934 Milwaukee Grand Haven K 14933 43°N 14924 A 14931 L 14932 Racine 14925 Holland 14904 14906 14930 Benton Harbor 14927 St. Josephs Chicago 14928 14929 Calumet Harbor 14926 14905 INDIANA ILLINOIS 19 SEP 2021 U.S. Coast Pilot 6, Chapter 11 ¢ 349 Lake Michigan (1) produced by storms. Winds and barometric pressure Chart Datum, Lake Michigan changes that accompany squalls can produce fluctuations that last from a few minutes to a few hours. At other (2) Depths and vertical clearances under overhead times, strong winds of sustained speed and direction can cables and bridges given in this chapter are referred produce fluctuations that last a few hours or a day. These to Low Water Datum, which for Lake Michigan is an winds drive forward a greater volume of surface water elevation 577.5 feet (176.0 meters) above mean water than can be carried off by the lower return currents, thus level at Rimouski, QC, on International Great Lakes raising the water level on the lee shore and lowering it on Datum 1985 (IGLD 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • CORRESPONDS with ATTACHMENT K ATTACHED to the AGENCYS STATEMENT of REASONS) Lauren Placek
    RECREATIONAL INFORMATION PERTAINING TO SKULLING, BOAT LAUNCHES AND OTHER RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES (CORRESPONDS WITH ATTACHMENT K ATTACHED TO THE AGENCYS STATEMENT OF REASONS) Lauren Placek <Igplacek@villageo To: Janet Pellegrini/R5/USEPA/US@EPA fworth.com> cc: Subject: Village of Worth Boat Launch Revenue 10/15/02 12:11 PM Janet—attached you will find the boat launch revenues for the years 2001 and 2002. As I mentioned last week. Our boat launch is $7 daily or $50 season pass. The cost for just parking your car and not launching is $2. Hope this helps. Lauren G. Placek Deputy Clerk Village of Worth 7112 W.. 111th Street Worth IL 60482 (708) 923-7505 (See attached file: Boat Launch Fees by Month.xls) Boat Launch Fees by Month 8000 Apr-01 750 Apr-02 1184.75 7000 6000 May-01 1855.09 May-02 2983.65 5000 Jun-01 4186.00 Jun-02 7417.95 4000 4808.00 Jul-02 7335.50 3000 Jul-01 2000 Aug-01 3845.41 Aug-02 5504.02 1000 Sep-01 1643.00 Sep-02 4291.04 0 Oct-01 723.00 Oct-02 640.00 ,c) Tota I $ 17,810.50 $ 29,356.91 \A` 1 cc• OG coe.Q Tom Nagawiecki - Fwd: Re: Chicago Area Waterway UAA Page 1 CA, From: Rob Sulski To: Nagawiecki, Tom Date: 6/11/2007 10:32:38 AM Subject: Fwd: Re: Chicago Area Waterway UAA »> John Mickle <[email protected]> 10/25/2002 2:01 PM >» Rob Sulski <[email protected]> wrote: Im sorry that the Nov.
    [Show full text]