<<

Stratigraphy of the Star Peak Group () and Overlying Lower Mesozoic Rocks ,

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 592

Stratigraphy of the Star Peak Group (Triassic) and Overlying Lower Mesozoic Rocks Humboldt Range, Nevada

By N. J. SILBERLING and ROBERT E. WALLACE

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 592

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1969 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary

GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

William T. Pecora, Director

Library of Congress cata~og-card No. GS 68-262

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Offic~ Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1.25 (paper cover) CONTENTS

Page Page Abstract______1 Star Peak Group-Continued Introduction ______. ______-.-______2 Paleogeographic interpretation-Continued Fieldwork and geologic mapping______6 Facies relation between the Prida and Natchez Pass Formations______28 Acknowledgments______6 Terminology______6 Relationship between volcanic and carbonate rocks in the Nat chez Pass Formation______29 Star Peak Group______6 Regional relations of the upper member of the Prida Formation______8 Natchez Pass Formation______30 Lithologic description______10 Grass Valley Formation______31 Lower member______10 Lithologic description______31 Middle member______13 Age______34 Upper member______13 Paleogeographic interpretation______36 Fossils and age______15 Dun Glen Formation______40 Natchez Pass Formation______20 Lithologic description______41 Fossils and age______42 Lithologic description ______'____ 21 Post-Dun Glen lower Mesozoic strata in the Pershing Fossils and age______24 district______44 Paleogeographic interpretation of the Star Peak Lower unit______44 Group______25 Upper unit______46 Lateral variation at the base of the Star Peak References______47 Grouv------25 Index______49

ILLUSTRATIONS

Page PLATE 1. Fence diagram showing the reconstructed section of the lower part of the Prida Formation along the east side of the Humboldt Range between Congress and Star Canyons, N ev ______- ___ - _ In pocket 2. Fence diagram showing the reconstructed section of the Star Peak Group along the length of tlie Humboldt Range, Nev ______In pocket FIGURE 1. Index map showing location of the Humboldt Range______3 2. Diagram showing succession of lower Mesozoic rock units in the Humboldt Range ______--_------4 3. Diagram showing time-stratigraphic correlation and lateral variations in the age of the lower Mesozoic rock units in the Humboldt Range ______- ____ - __ --- 5 4-8. Photographs showing: 4. East flank of Star Peak ______- ___ ---_------8 5. Talus characteristic of the brown calcareous sandstone unit; lower member of the Prida Formation_- 11 6. Weathered block composed partly of metavolcanic rock and partly of impure dolomite; lower member of the Prida Formation______12 7. Outcrop of dark laminated dolomite; upper member of the Prida Formation ______--- 14 8. Carbonate rocks from the upper member of the Prida Formation on Fossil HilL ______-_-__ 16 9. Isopach map of pre-upper strata at the base of the Star Peak Group ______~ __ - ______--_--- 27 10. Very thin and thin-bedded impure sandstone of the Grass Valley Formation ______- __ --- 32 11. Linguoid ripple marks on the top surface of an impure sandstone bed in the Grass Valley Formation______33 12. Sedimentary structures on the bottom surfaces of sandstone slabs from the upper part of the Grass Valley Formation______35 13. Sedimentary structures of a single slab of thin-bedded impure sandstone from the Grass Valley Formation_ 37 14. Diagrammatic comparison of the thickness, composition, and paleocurrent directions of the Grass Valley Formation in the Humboldt Range and nearby ranges to the east______38 15. Photograph showing carbonate breccia and conglomerate from Upper Triassic rocks of the Pershing district_ 43

TABLE

TABLE 1. Composition and biostratigraphic assignment of the ammonite faunas from the lower part of the Prida Forma- tion in the northeastern part of the Humboldt Range ______--- _------17 III

STRATIGRAPHY OF THE STAR PEAK GROUP (TRIASSIC) AND OVERLYING LOWER MESOZOIC ROCKS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NEVADA

By N. J. SrLBERLING and RoBERT E. WALLACE

ABSTRACT Prida are compensated for by -rhanges in the thickness and age The Star Peak Group and other, still younger, lower Mesozoic of the massive organic-detrital carbonate rocks that form the rocks of the ""Winnemucca sequence" of Silberling and Roberts lower part of the overlying Natchez Pass Formation. The upper form roughly half the bedrock exposures in the Humboldt Range, Prida and part of the lower Natchez Pass are therefore inter­ which occupies parts of the Imlay, Unionville, and Buffalo preted as interfingering facies of one another, the upper Prida Mountain quadrangles in northwestern Nevada. These strata, being the deposit that accumulated farther from shore and in aggregating more than 10,000 feet in thickness, are largely ma­ deeper water. rine sedimentary rocks that overlie with subtle angular uncon­ Within the Natchez Pass Formation, which forms the upper formity the predominantly volcanic Koipato Group of formation of the Star Peak Group, two members are recognized to earliest Triassic age. Exposures of the Star Peak Group throughout most of the Humboldt Range. The lower member roughly encircle the central part of the range and are most ex­ consists mainly of massive thick and very thick bedded car­ tensive at its north and south ends. The Star Peak Group, bonate rocks except in the southern part of the range, where comprising the Prida and Natchez Pass Formations, is char­ roughly half of its 1,500-foot thickness is made up of mafic acterized by calcareous rocks whose composition contrasts volcanic rocks. Farther north in the range, where the lower sharply wth that of the overlying formations, which are com­ Natchez Pass is largely supplanted by the upper Prida, the posed mainly of fine-grained terrigenous clastic rocks. thickness of the lower Natchez Pass is as little as 400 feet. The Prida Formation, the lower formation of the Star Peak The upper member of the Natchez Pass is about 1,000 feet Group, is divided into three informal members. Its lower mem­ thick whereV1er recognized in the Humboldt Range. In most of ber is lithologically heterogenous and includes a variety of cal­ the range, brown-weathering impure silty limestone forms its careous terrigenous clastic rocks and impure carbonate rock~ lower part and abruptly, and perhaps disconformably, overlies above a basal clastic unit of noncalcareous sandstone and con­ the lower member. These impure limestones grade upward into glomerate. Lateral lithologic changes within the lower member an approximately equal thickness of massive thick-bedded rela­ and variation in its thickness from a few tens of feet to several tively pure carbonate rock resembling that of the lower member. hundred feet reflect the original slope and topographic irregu­ Although these two members cannot be recognized among the larity of the eroded surface of the underlying rocks of the structurally deformed carbonate rocks of the Natchez Pass at Koipato Group. In the northern part of the Humboldt Range, the northeastern tip of the range, about 400 feet of interbedded much of the lower Prida is locally cut out against two promin­ chert conglomerate, sandstone, and calcareous siltstone in the ent basement highs that coincide in location with intrusive parts middle part of the section there may be a coarse clastic equiva­ of the Koipato volcanic pile and with the principal silver depos­ lent of the impure limestone that forms the lower part of the its in the Star Peak rocks. Elsewhere in the northern part of upper member farther south. the range, where the lower member of the Prida is thickest and In the southern part of the range, the Natchez Pass contains was first deposited, the lower member includes at least two fossils of probable early Karnian (earliest Late Triassic) age successive ammonite faunas of Spathian (latest Early Triassic) in its middle part and probably includes beds ranging from age. late Ladinian to late Karnian in age. Farther north, where the The middle member of the Prida similarly ranges in thickness, lower Natchez Pass is thinnest, the formation may be entirely locally attaining a maximum of 400 feet in the northern part of late Karnian in age. the range, but it is lithologically uniform and everywhere con­ Overlying the Star Peak Group at both ends of the Humboldt sists of gray, commonly highly fossiliferous limestone inter­ Range is the Grass Valley Formation, whose estimated thick­ bedded with calcareous shale and siltstone. It preserves a ness is a few thousand feet. Dark chlorite-bearing noncalcare­ uniquely complete sequence of ammonite fam1as representative ous pelitic rocks and sandstone characterize the Grass Valley, of early, middle, and late Anisian (early Middle Triassic) time. which is unfossHiferous except for occasional plant remains. The upper member of the Prida shows pronounced lateral vur­ Sandstone interbedded with the pelitic rocks accounts for about iation in its thickness and age, progressively thickening from 100 one-third of the total thickness and is of two 'generally different feet in the southern part of the range, where it is wholly Ladinian kinds. The more common kind is dark thin-bedded very fine (late Middle Tria~sic) in age, to 2,000 feet or more in the north­ grained micaceous sandstone that occurs in laterally discon­ western part of the range, where it ranges from early Ladinian tinuous units throughout the section. Bedding surfaces, both to early Karnian (earliest Late Triassic) in age. The upper in the Humboldt Range and to the northeast in the East Range, Prida is comp<:>sed of evenly parted dark cherty laminated lime­ commonly bear linguoid ripple marks and other sedimentary stone (or, more rarely, dolomite) having some interbedded units features that indicate uniform northwest-trending current di­ of massive organic-detrital carbonate rocks. Fossils are scarce rections. Less common than the impure sandstone is clean me­ and except for sponge spicules, exclusively of planktonic inverte­ dium-grained sandstone. It occurs in laterally persistent units, brates. Lateral changes in the thickness and age of the upper generally a few tens of feet thick, and may represent beach and 1 2 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWER ME/SO ZOIC ROCKS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NE:VADA

bar deposits. The Grass Valley is similar in composition to is shown in figure 1, rocks of the "Winnemucca se­ much of the upper part of the lower Mesozoic section in north­ quence" aggregate more than 10,000 feet in thickness western Nevada, in which rapidly deposited fine-grained terri­ and, together with the underlying dominantly volcanic genous clastic sedimentary rocks predominate. Regional facies changes, composition, sedimentary structures, and stratigraphic Koipato Group, form by far the largest part of the position between shallow-water marine carbonate rocks suggest bedrock exposures. that the GTass Valley is part of a prograding deltaic complex The succession of lower Mesozoic rock units and their related to major river drainage that flowed into northwestern variations in thickness from one end of the range to the Nevada from the east. The upper part of the Grass Valley, together with younger other are illustrated diagrammatically in figure 2. The rocks, is preserved only in the Pershing mining district at the age relations of these rock units are shown in figure 3. southern tip of the Humboldt Range. There, the uppermost sev­ These lower Mesozoic strata of the "Winnemucca eral hundred feet of the formation is repeated by large-scale sequence" roughly encircle the central part of the Hum­ overturned folds. Unlike most of the Grass Valley, this upper part weathers orange and red, is partly calcareous, and locally boldt Range and delineate its major structure, which is contains marine fossils, including ammonites of early middle a large-scale much-deformed anticlinal fold whose axis Norian (late Late Triassic) age. strikes somewhat northeast of the general north trend The Grass VaHey grades upward into carbonate rocks of the of the range. Calcareous rocks of the Star Peak Group­ Dun Glen Formation. The Dun Glen ranges in thickness from that is, the lower part of the "Winnemucca sequence"­ several tens of feet to a few hundred feet in the Pershing dis­ trict, but is considerably thicker in mountain ranges farther east border the range on either side and dip away from the in northwestern Nevada. Most of the Dun Glen is well-bedded older rocks of the Koipato Group that are in the anti­ massive limestone that locally contains a large and diverse as­ clinal core of the range. Toward either end of the range, semblage of .shallow-water marine invertebm.tes and calcareous strata of the "Winnemucca sequence" are more widely algae. Where the formation is thickest, its upper part consists and completely exposed. In the northern part of the of intraclastic limestone or dolomitic sedimentary breccia. The post-Dun Glen lower Mesozoic strata in the Pershing dis­ range, they form the stucturally complex and partly trict are divided into two informal map units, the lower of overturned west limb of the major anticlinal structure, which consists mainly of orange- and red-weathering partly and at the southern end of the range they wrap around calcareous pelitic rocks, siltstone, and sandstone resembling the the southward-plunging axis of this fold and are in­ uppermost Grass Valley Formation in the same area. Owing volved in northwest-trending folds that apparently to structural complications, the thickness of the lower unit of post-Dun Glen strata is uncertain, but it is thought to be about truncate the major northeast-trending anticline. The 2,000 feet. At one place a large ammonite fauna of late middle higher parts of the "Winnemucca sequence" that overlie Norian age was obtained f·rom near the base of the lower unit. the Star Peak Group at the north end of the Humboldt In the part of the Pershing district where the underlying Dun Range are represented by the Grass Valley Formation; Glen Formation is relatively thin, a conspicuous unit of dolo­ at the south end of the range they include the Grass mite conglomerate up to 100 feet thick occurs a few hundred feet above the base of the lower unit of post-Dun Glen strata. Valley and Dun Glen Formations and still younger, The mercury deposits of the Pershing district are largely re­ unnamed beds of latest Triassic and Early age. stricted to this dolomite conglomerate and to the limestone and As elsewhere, these higher parts of the "Winnemucca dolomite sedimentary breccia· that forms the upper part of the sequence," though partly calcareous, are composed thick Dun Glen sections in other parts of the district. mainly of fine-grained terrigenous clastic rocks. The upper unit of post-Dun Glen •strata is lithologically het­ erogenous and includes a variety of calcareous siltstones and The Humboldt Range affords an unusually good op­ sandstones, limestones, and pelitic rocks having an aggregate ex­ portunity to study the "Winnemucca sequence"-par­ posed thickness of more than 1,000 feet. Upper Norian (upper ticularly its lower part-because these rocks are con­ Upper Triassic) ammonites and the pelecypod Monotis sub­ tained in a single continuously exposed structural block circularis occur at several places in its lower part. Ammonites nearly 40 miles long. Probably nowhere else in north­ indicative of both the lower and the upper parts of the Lower Jurassic have also been found in isolated exposures of strata western Nevada can lateral changes among the scattered that are included in the upper unit and are the youngest pre­ exposures of lower Mesozoic rocks be studied over so Tertiary strata in the Humboldt Range. great a distance without risk of overlooking large-scale structural rearrangement. Another notable feature of INTRODUCTION the "Winnemucca sequence" in the Humboldt Range The Star Peak Group and the other lower Mesozoic is its generally more marine character in comparison strata that overlie it form the "Winnemucca sequence" with the related rocks in the ranges to the east. Thus, of Silberling and Roberts (1962), one of several dis­ marine faunas found in the Humboldt Range provide tinct sequences of largely marine lower Mesozoic rocks relatively precise age assignments for several different that characterize different parts of northwestern Ne­ parts of the "Winnemucca sequence" whose ages else­ vada. In the Humboldt Range, whose geographic setting where have been uncertain. INTRODUCTION 3

us· 117"

Area of index map

NEVADA

41°

40°

, •.,~1: ~ l!o.'''"''t. ·-~ ~

FIGURE 1.-Looation of the Humboldt Range and the Imlay, Unionville, and Buffalo Mountain 1 : 62,500 quadrangles in relation to other nearby geographic features referred to in text. 4 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOW.E'R MEtSOZOIC ROCKJS, HUMBOLD'T' RANGE, NEVADA

H u M B 0 L D T R A N G E South North .... 0 -~ .... Q) (/) c ~ "0 .E ~ .r:: 00 ·- co >. c I co Q) .... .r:: c a. (/) 0 u "iii lo. lo. (/) N co Q) 0 -~ .... ·- a. LL <( (/) ~

Upper 0 5 10 MILES unit L______L ______+- 2000

1000

Lower 0 unit

/~ Grass Valley Formation~

------Datum

Natchez Pass Formation

Upper member

Prida Formation

Koipato Group

FIGURE 2.-Succession of lower Mesozoic rock units in the Humboldt Range showing the thickness and representation of the unirts from the south end of the range to the north end. Diagonal ruling indicates parts of the rock record that have been removed by erosion or that are obscured by younger deposits or by structural complications. INTRODUCTION 5

(/) HUMBOLDT RAN G E (/) w ~ (/) G South w w <( North 1- 0:: STAGES 1- C/) oo..., >. (/) w m IU ..... >- (/) -~ 0 c Q) ·- 1/) (/) .c.·~ ::> II)+' 0 c 0= (/) :I.. 1/) N·- :=;.c. Q) ·­ ·~ E a.."O <( ~

Toarcian () (i) :I.. CJ) ~ Pliensbachian <( 0 0:: ~ ~-----~t------1 ::>..., Sinemurian %!~-o CJ "(5 • C N t---+--t---H_e_t_ta_n_g_ia_n---1-----; upper ::J 0 Rhaetian unit 9~ t;~ Upper • 0 Lower a. Middle __ :I.. 1---•_...;;u:;:.;n~it:....- Q) Norian a. • Dun Glen Formation a. Lower ::> ~-----~t------1 Grass Valley Formation Upper Karnian Natchez Pass Formation a. • Lower ------.------~ • .. :I.. () Upper CJ Upper member .:s:. (/) Ladinian • • IU ~ ~ Lower Q) "0 ~-----~----1 ----:z------Prida +Formation-----~------! 0:: :"Q Upper f- ~ • • • • 2 e Middle and lower • members CJ) • Anisian Middle and Lower Spath ian

:I.. Smith ian ~ t----0-ie_n_e_r_i_a_n--+---~

~ t------~~--~ Upper Griesbachian 1-----1 Lower

z Koipato Group <( ~ 0:: w a.

FIGURE 3.-T'ime-stratigraphic correlation and lateral variations in the age of the lower Mesozoic roek units in the Humboldt Range. Solicl dots represent the occurrence of age-diagnostic fossils. Vertical ruling indicate~ ~tratigraphic hiatu~-1; diagonal ruling, lack of darta.

310-683 Q-68--2 6 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWER ME1SOZOIC ROCKJS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NIDVADA

FIELDWORK AND GEOLOGIC MAPPING large area in the northeastern part of the range was especially helpful. - The present report stems from two larger programs, The Humboldt Range is one of the few stratigrfllphi­ one concerned with the geology and mineral deposits of cally significant areas that escaped rigorous study by the Buffalo Mountain, Unionville, and Imlay 1:62,500 Dr. S. W. Muller, of Stanford University and the U.S. quadrangles, and a second concerned with the Triassic Geological Survey, during his researches on the lower System in North America. Fieldwork in the Humboldt Mesozoic of northwestern Nevada. Nevertheless, Pro­ Range was done by the writers and D. B. Tatlock largely fessor Muller gave considerable aid-based on his re­ during the summers of 1956-59 but also during subse­ connaissance in various parts of the range-in directing quent shorter visits to the area. the writers to localities of critical geologic and paleon­ The part of the Humboldt Range that lies within the tologic interest. Imlay quadrangle, including the type locality of the Dr. Stanislaw Dzulynski, of the Polish Academy of Star Peak Group, was mapped geologically on field Sciences, visited various exposures of the Grass Valley sheets ·at 'a scale of 1 : 24,000. Those areas where rocks Formation and related rocks in the vicinity of the Hum­ of the "Winnemucca sequence" crop out in the north­ boldt Range during 1958 in company with Silberling. eastern and southeastern parts of the range within the His help in interpreting the depositional history of these Unionville quadrangle were mapped on field sheets at rocks is gratefully acknowledged. 1 : 12,000; elsewhere in this quadrangle, mapping was Dr. E. T. Tozer, of the Geological Survey of Canada, at a scale of 1:48,000. Likewise, the areas of "Winne­ provided invaluable advice on the identification and mucca sequence" outcrop in the southeastern part of the age assignment of the Triassic molluscan faunas at range within the Buffalo Mountain quadrangle, as well various times during the course of this study and dur­ as parts of the Pershing district within this quadrangle, ing a visit to the area in 1964. were mapped in the field at 1 : 12,000 ; the other parts of the Buffalo Mountain quadrangle were mapped at TERMINOLOGY 1:48,000. The conventions of terminology used in the following This mapping, which documents the present strati­ stratigraphic descriptions are those proposed by Went­ graphic study, is incorporated in the separately pub­ worth ( 1922) for the grain size of clastic sedimentary lished geologic quadrangle map of the Imlay quad­ rocks, by Goddard and others (1948) for rock colors, rangle (Silberling and W~allace, 1967) and in the yet un­ and by Ingram ( 1954) for the thickness of stratifica­ published Unionville and Buffalo ~fountain quadrangle tion and parting units in sedimentary rocks. The term maps being prepared by R. E. Wallace, N. J. Silber­ "massive" is applied to rocks characterized by relatively ling, and D. B. Tatlock. The geologic quadrangle maps thick beds that lack apparent internal compositional of the Buffalo Mountain and Unionville quadrangles are variations or structures. to supersede the preliminary geologic maps of these Most of the lower Mesozoic carbonate rocks of the areas published previously (Wallace and others, 1959, Humboldt Range have undergone some degree of recrys­ 1960). talliz,ation, hut inso:f.ar ·as possible the teDminology Most of the stratigraphic thicknesses given in the used for limestones follows the classification of Folk desc~iptions of these lower Mesozoic strata are based on ( 1959, 1962), and the crystallinity of carbonate rocks the geologic-map relations of the strata. For the most is expressed according to the scheme recommended by part, detailed measured sections of the rocks are mean­ Folk (1962). ingless, as the units are thick, monotonously uniform All U.S. Geological Survey Mesozoic fossil localities and lacking marker horizons, and locally poorly exposed in the Humboldt Range that are cited by number in the and structurally ,complex. text are either plotted on the geologic quadrangle maps or related on plate 1 to plotted localities. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS STAR PEAK GROUP Previous geologic research that touched on some as­ The Star Peak Group, for which Star Peak in the pect of the "Winnemucca sequence" in the Humboldt northern Humboldt Range is the type locality, com­ Range began with the pioneer studies of the 40th Par­ prises ~the predominantly calcareous Prida and Natchez allel Survey (Hague and Emmons, 1877; King, 1878) Pass Formations, whose typical exposures are in the and included studies by Hyatt and Smith (1905), Ran­ East Range. In the Humboldt Range these formations some (1909), Smith (1914) and Knopf (1924). There­ are locally nearly 4,000 feet in combined thickness and port by Cameron (1939) concerning the geology of a range from latest Early Triassic to medial Late Trias- STAR PEAK GROUP 7 sic in age. The Prida Formation rests unconformably units originally included in the Star Peak represent on the Koipato Group, and its lower part consists ot Koipato volcanic rocks repeated by strike faulting, and impure carbonate rocks and calcareous clastic rocks the Star Peak was redefined as comprising the mainly whose composition and thickness vary from place to calcareous Middle and Upper Triassic strata overlying place. Laminated cherty limestone and dolomite form the Koipato. Recognizing that the upper limit of the most of t he upper part of the Prida, whose thickness Star Peak is not exposed in the area studied by him, ranges greatly in the Humboldt Ra.nge and varies in­ Cameron selected as the most complete sequence the versely with the thickness of t.he lo"·er part of the over­ limestones exposed on the east face of Star Peak from lying Natchez Pass Formation. Massive thick-bedded the outcrops of the Koipato in American Basin up to organic-detrita.l carbonate rocks characterize the the summit (fig. 4) . This sequence was described as a Natchez Pass, but generally subordimute amounts of continuous section formed by three successive limesto:Q.e volc.

FIGURE 4.- IDast flank of Star Peak. Rocks exposed form part of the Star Peak Group as originally described by King (1878) and were subsequently used by Cameron (1939) as the basis for redefinition of the group. Rock units as labeled are: Rochester Rhyolite {Pr); Prida Formation, comprising the lower member (lip/) and middle member (lipm), or the undifferentiated lower and middle members (liplm), and the upper member (lipu); Natchez Pass Formation, including the lower member (lin/) and upper mellllber (linu); and Quaternary older alluvial deposits {Qoo). the Grass Valley Formation. Thus the rocks upon which the underlying Koipato Formation, overlain by 50-100 King ( 1878, p. 269) based his statement that in the feet of brown-weathering massive silty and sandy dolo­ Humboldt Range "the Trias and the Jura are perfectly mite; (2) a middle unit of about 150 feet of calcareous conformable" actually have no bearing on the Triassic­ shale and siltstone with interbeds of gray limestone; and Jurassic boundary. (3) an upper unit of about 100 feet of regularly bedded dark-gray cherty limestone transitional into the over­ FRIDA FORMATION lying mostly massive dolomite and limestone of the The Prida Formation as established by Muller, Fer­ Natchez Pass Formation. guson, and Roberts (1951) has the northeastern East In the Humboldt Range, exposures of the Prida For­ Range as its type locality. The somewhat deformed and mation almost encircle the rocks of the Koipato Group laterally variable section in the East Range has not been that occupy the core of the broad anticlinal fold in the described in detail, but in general the Prida at its type central part of the range. The Prida crops out intermit­ locality includes (1) a lower unit that consists of 10-50 tently along the southeast flank of the range from feet of basal sandstone and conglomerate, derived from American Canyon south to Fisher Canyon; from there PRIDA FORMATION 9 it swings westward, crosses Black Ridge in a narrow gradual truncation of units within the Koipato beneath outcrop band, and then continues from the north end of the unconformity, but the amount of discordance is too Packard Flat northward along the west flank of the small for measurement in any one exposure. At many range. North of the latitude of Rocky Canyon, in the places in the range, the basal beds of the Prida are con­ northern part of the Unionville quadrangle and in the glomerate and sandstone composed of detritus from the Imlay quadrangle, the Prida is widely exposed in the underlying l{oipato, 'and they are indicative of a period higher parts of the range, where it forms part of the of erosion preceding deposition of the Star Peak Group structurally complex northwestern limb of the same as noted by Wheeler ( 1939, p. 106-107) and Cameron large-scale anticlinal fold. ( 1939, p. 580). Starting with King ( 1878, p. 269), early In the southern part of the Humboldt Range-for workers were influenced by the lack of obvious dis­ example, on the east slope of Black Ridge within the cordance between the Koipato and Star Peak and were Buffalo Mountain quadrangle-the lithologic succession misled by the inclusion of fault slivers of Koipato rocks and thickness of the Prida Formation are about the in the typical Star Peak section. Consequently, they re­ same as in its type area in the northeastern East Range. garded the two sequences as conformable and assigned Though not everywhere shown on the geologic map, the Koi pato to the lower part of the Triassic. The strong three informal subdivisions, termed the lower, middle, argument by Knopf ( 1924, p. 30) for conformity be­ and upper mem·bers can be recognized; these correspond tween, and even contemporaneity of the limestones of to the three units given for the type locality. In this the Star Peak and volcanic rocks of the underlying part of the Humboldt Range, as in the northern East Koi pato was based on exposures on the west fl·ank of Range, the Prida is wholly Middle Triassic, ranging Black Ridge, where the nature of the contact between from late Anisian to Ladinian in age. (See fig. 3.) these groups is indeed deceiving. Here, the Weaver Farther north in the Humboldt Range, the thickness Rhyolite at the top of the Koipato includes a thick clas­ of the Prida increases markedly and progressively, at­ tic unit that is unique in containing a few beds of lime­ taining a maximum of over '2,500 feet in the northwest­ stone; the highest unit of the Weaver is a mixture of ern part of the range. Although the same three mem­ rhyolite felsite and clastic rocks indistinguishable from bers can be recognized, the gross aspect of the forma­ the sheared basaJ clastics of the Prida; the section of tion differs considerably from that farther south in the the Prida is the thinnest in the range; and most of the Humboldt Range or in the East Range owing to 'pro­ overlying Natchez Pass Form:ation is composed of vol­ nounced differences in the relative thickness of the dif­ canic flows, breccias, and tuffs rather than the carbonate ferent members. Several hundred feet of this increase rock more characteristic of the :formation. All of these in thickness within the Humboldt Range results from units, however, can be traced northeastward to the east lateral variations in the lower and middle members· side of the range, where the unconformable relation be­ these variations reflect the configuration of the preexist-' tween the Prida Formation and the underlying Weaver ing erosional surface of the underlying Koipato Group. Rhyolite is more apparent. Benea:th the Prida near the Locally, in the northern part of the range, deposition mouth of Fisher Canyon the highest unit of the Weaver of the Prida began as early as the Spathian (latest is a rhyolite felsite which is successively underlain by a Early Triassic), and the lower and middle members are clastic unit, another felsite unit, and another clastic unit. each as much as 400 feet thick. Most of the increase in On the north side of Troy Canyon, 2 miles farther thickness of the formation, however, results from thick­ north, the upper felsite unit is absent, and the Prida ening of the upper member at the expense of the over­ rests on the underlying upper clastic unit. Between Troy lying Natchez Pass Formation. (See fig. 2.) The thick and South American Canyons, this upper clastic unit sequence of dark laminated cherty limestone that forms in turn thins northward beneath the unconformity until the upper member of the Prida includes beds as young it feathers out, and the Prida ultimately rests on the as earliest Karnian ( eadiest Late Triassic) in the north­ lower felsite unit. This progressive truncation of the western part of the range and is interpreted to be in Koipato agrees with the general trend, first observed large part a relatively offshore, deeper water facies of by Oameron ( 1939, p. 579), for the Star Peak Group to the massive carbonate rocks that form the lower part progressively overlie stratigraphically lower parts of of the Natchez Pass Formation and have their great­ the Koipato toward the north end of the range. est thickness in the southern part of the range. Only several hundred feet of the Rochester Rhyolite The Prida Formation in the Humboldt Range like separates the Prida Formation from greenstones as­ that in the nearby ranges to the east (Muller and others, signed to the lowest formation of the Koipato Group, 1951; Ferguson and others, 1951), rests unconformably the Limerick Greenstone, in the northeastern part of on the Koipato Group. Angular discordance is shown by the range, whereas a thick section of Rochester Rhyo- 10 S'.PRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWIER ME1SOZOIC ROCKJS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NE,VADA

lite underlies the Prida in the central part of the range; mine area near Unionville on the east side of the north­ at the south end of the range, both the Rochester and central part of the range. For brevity, these features the overlying Weaver Rhyolite, which total several are termed, respectively, the Star-Humboldt basement thousand feet, intervene ,between the Limerick Green­ high and the Arizona basement high. Their configura­ stone and the base of the Star Peak Group. Consider­ tions, as indicated by lateral variations in the thick­ able erosion of the Koipato Group in the northern Hum­ ness of the lower member of the Prida Formation, are boldt Hange prior to deposition of the Prida Formation shown in figure 9. (See section on paleogeographic in­ is further suggested by exposures in and around Hum­ terpretation, p. 25.) boldt Canyon, where the Prida rests both on the Ro­ A way from these basement highs, thick sections of the chester Rhyolite nnd on sills of rhyolite prophyry within lo,ver 1nember of the Prida crop out in two separate the Rochester that are interpreted ns feeder dikes for areas in the northern part of the range: along the east higher parts of the Koipato Group such as the Weaver flank from Buena Vista Canyon northward, and on Rhyolite at the ,south end of the range. The greater depth the west side of the range between Ryepateh and Eldo­ to which the Koipato in the northern part of the range rado Canyons. In both of these outcrop areas, the char­ was eroded prior to Star Peak deposition, together with acter of the lower 1nember is generally alike; presum­ the general north to south transgression of the Star ably this relatively thick lower Prida section is con­ Peak over the eroded surface of the Koipato, results in tinuous across the range, although the lower member a somewhat different stratigraphic hiatus at the uncon­ is c.oncealed !beneath younger Star Peak rocks at the formity between the Star Peak and Koipato Groups in head of Coyote and Buffalo Canyons between the Star· different parts of the range. ':Do the north, the hiatus rep­ Humboldt and Arizona basement highs. resents latest Permian to late Early Triassic time, but The lower Prida sections on both sides of the range to the south it represents early E,arly Triassic to early are as much as 400 feet thick and are composed of three Middle Triassic time. distinct lithologic units: a basal unit of terrigenous clas­ LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION tic rocks, an intermediate unit of carbonate rocks, and LOWER MEMBER an upper, distinctive brown-weathering calcareous sand­ The lower member of the Prida Formation shows stone and siltstone termed the brown calcareous sand­ marked lateral variations in thickness, composition, and stone unit. Of these, the basal clastic unit ranges in age within the Humboldt Range. (See pl. 2.) These thickness from several feet to about 100 feet. Well strat­ variations reflect a general southward transgression of ified nonca1careous sandstone is prevalent in addiHon the Star Peak seas across the eroded surface of the Koi­ to poorly sorted grit and fine-grained conglomerate pato Group, upon which local topographic highs stood composed of debris from the underlying Koipato. The as islands or peninsulas during the initial phases of basal clastics are thickest and coarsest in grain size near Prida deposition. the highs on the surface of the underlying Koipato. The Though lithologically hetergeneous, the lower mem­ coarsest clastics were observed at the base of the lower ber consists mainly of calcareous and dolomitic siltstone member near the mouth of the North Fork of Straight and sandstone or silty and sandy limestone and dolo­ Canyon on the northwest flank of the Arizona basement mite, the relative proportions varying from place to high. Here, much of the basal clastic unit is a boulder place. N oncaleareous terrigenous clastic rocks and eon­ conglomerate formed of flow-banded rhyolite felsite glomerate are generally confined to the basal part of from the locally underlying Rochester Rhyolite. the member and rarely exceed a few tens of feet in The carbonate unit, above the basal clastic unit, at­ thickness. Relatively pure carbonate rocks for1n a minor tains a maximum thickness of about 300 feet near the part of the thicker sections, and volcanic rocks are found east front of the range between Coyote and Bloody within the lower member in one small part of the Hum­ Canyons. It is variable in composition but consists boldt Range. largely of silty or sandy gray limestone irregularly The more abrupt lateral changes in the lower member interbedded with subordinate units of yellow-brown or occur in the northern part of the Humboldt Range, reddish-brown calcareous siltstone and sandstone. Com­ where the member was first deposited and attains its monly, the limestone is crystalline and coarse grained, greatest thickness and yet locally is largely cut out but some 9eds or,concretions of fossiliferous dense argil­ against two prominent highs on the Koipato basement. laceous limestone are locally included. Near the base­ One of these basement highs is in the northwestern part ment highs-for example, in the vicinity of Congress of the range and is centered around the head of Star Canyon-the carbonate unit is thinner and somewhat Canyon and the upper parts of Humboldt and Imlay intergradational with the underlying basal clastic unit. Canyons, and the other extends through the Arizona The carbonate unit here consists mainly of thick-bedded PRIDA FORMATION 11 dolomite having sand- or even grit-sized terrigenous the preexisting topographic highs on the Koipato sur­ clastic impurities and interbeds. Fossils from this unit face have been described above. Near the basement suggest that a disconformity exists within the unit in highs, these units abruptly lose their individuality and the vicinity of John Brown Canyon and that its upper at least locally are replaced by partly calcareous sand­ part is progressively cut out toward the Arizona base­ stone and conglomerate that laps up against the highs. ment high. On the east side of the range, this type of lateral change The brown calcareous sandstone unit forms the high­ is '"ell shown by the lower member in Star Canyon. est part of the thickened lo·wer member in the northern Near the mouth of the canyon, the basal clastic unit, the part of the range and consists of massive calcareous or carbonate unit, and the brown caloareous sandstone unit dolomitic siltstone and Yery fine grained sandstone that aggregate nearly 400 feet in thickness. Up the canyon, weathers pale reddish brown and yellowish brown. These toward the Star-Humboldt basement high, they thin and rocks characteristically part at a high angle to the bed­ in Jess than half a mile are replaced in the section near ding and form a distinctive brmm slabby talus (fig. 5) the Sheba and DeSoto mines by about 200 feet of sand­ that is conspicuous at a number of places in the northern stone and grit that includes, in the upper part, inter­ part of the range. The brmn1 calcareous sandstone unit bedded lenticular units of sandy limestone as much as is nearly 300 feet thick in Congress Canyon, "·here inter­ several feet thick. Middle Anisian ammonites from the beds and irregular patches of gray limestone form an basal beds of the overlying middle member of the Frida appreciable part of its upper half, but farther away here are like those that occur nearly 300 feet above the from the Arizona basement high it is mostly about 100 top of the lo"·er member near the mouth of Star Can­ feet thick. Paleontologic evidence show·s that most of yon; hence, an appreciable amount of transgression this thinning results from interfingering of the higher evidently accompanies this lateral lithologic change. parts of the brown calcareous sandstone unit into the Still farther west, on the range crest between the heads lower part of the middle member of the Frida Forma­ of Star and Humboldt Canyons and on top of the Star­ tion. (See pl. 1.) Humboldt basement high, the entire lower member con­ Some of the lateral yariation in lithologic characters sists of only a few tens of feet of Koipato-derived clas­ and thickness that takes place within the three succes­ tics and bro"·n-weathering silty dolomite. As poorly sive units that form the thick lower member in the preserved fossils of probable late Anisian age occur just northern part of the range as they are traced toward above in the middle member, the lower member here may be wholly younger than the thick lower Frida section on the east flank of the range. The lateral changes within the lower member of the Frida as it is traced from its extensive exposures on the west side of the range in Panther, Echo, and Buffalo Canyons southeastward across the range crest toward the Arizona basement high are unique in that mafic vol­ canic rocks are included in the sections alongside the basement high. At the head of Echo Canyon, a thick lens of metavolcanic rock fragments in a dolomitic matrix occurs within impure dolomite and limestone of the carbonate unit of the lower member, and at the head of Panther Canyon a thin flow of mafic metavolcanic rock intervenes at about this same level in the section. About 1% miles farther south along the range crest, near ""Wright Peak" (VABM 8882), vesicular mafic meta­ volcanic rocks form the entire upper part of the lower member, supplant the brown calcareous sandstone unit, and directly underlie the middle member of the Frida. The extrusive nature of these volcanic rocks is clearly sho,,n by the intimate mixture of brecciated amygda­ loidal volcanic fragments and brown-weathering silty FIGUHE ;J.- 'l'alus characteristic of the brown calcareous sand­ dolomite like that which underlies the volcanic rocks stone unit that locally forms the top of the lower member of the Prida Formation in the northern part of the Humboldt Range. (fig. 6). At the next exposure to the east, about 1 mile East side of Congress Canyon near its mouth. distant, at Fourth of July Flat, mafic metavolcanic 12 STRATIGRAPHY 0 'F THE LOWER MEtSOZOIC ROC~S, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NE,VADA miles. Unfortunately, exposures of the Prida along the west margin of the central part of the range are too deformed and altered for meaningful stratigraphic comparison. Nevertheless, the lower member of the Prida in the southern part of the range south of Amer­ ican Canyon is generally like that in the Arizona mine area and is probably not a temporal equivalent of the thick lower member in the more northerly parts of the range. (See pl. 2.) In the southern part of the range, the lower member is fairly uniform from place to place and comprises basal clastics overlain by silty and sandy dolomitic and cal­ careous rocks. The principal lateral variations are in thickness, which ranges from about 150 feet on the east side of the range to only a fe"· feet on the west side of Black Ridge. The basal clastic unit in the vicinity of South American and Troy Canyons is generally less than 10 feet thick, but on the south side of Fisher Can­ yon its thickness varies within a few hundred yards along the strike from several feet to several tens of feet. These noncalcareous clastic rocks are commonly pebbly

FIGURE 6.-,Veathered block composed partly of vesicular and grit of poorly rounded Koipato fragments whose white amygdaloidal mafic metavolcanic rock (lower part) and and brown colors impart a characteristic mottled partly of impure silty dolomite (upper part). Lower member appeamnce to fresh surfaces. Subeuheclral detrital crys­ of the Prida Formation on the range crest about half a mile tals of quartz and feldspar, probably derived from a north west of "Wright Peak" ( V ABM 8882). part of the Koipato such as the 'Veaver porphyritic rhyolite, form an appreciable part of the coarse sand rocks again form much of the lower member, but here grains. In places, well-stratified sandstone interlenses basal clastics are absent and the volcanic unit is overlain with these poorly sorted clastics, and the thicker sections by a:bout 20 feet of noncalcareous grit and sandstone. include conglomerate of rounded pebbles up to 2 inches The clastic unit that forms the top of the lower member in diameter. can be traced eastward to the vicinity of N1e Arizona, Above the basal clastic unit the greater part of the Inskip, and 'Vheeler mines, where it becomes the basal lower member in the southern part of the range is clastic unit of a greatly thinned ( totnl 10-30 ft) lo"·er slightly silty fine-grained dolomite that is medium gray member consisting of basal clastic rocks overlain by on fresh surfaces, 'veathers a distinctive pale yellowish impure dolomite. Thus, metavolcanic rocks in the lower brown, and locally contains nodular lenses of dark chert. member intertongue northwest"·ard from Fourth of These rocks tend to be massive, but in places they alter­ .T uly Flat with a thick nonvolcanic lower member, but nate with platy-weathering gray, pinkish-gray, or yel­ east of Fourth of July Flat, they abruptly lap up lowish-brown silty or sanely limestone and dolomitic against the '.-est slope of the Arizona basement high. siltstone. An unusual occurrence in the lower member The east slope of this basement high is marked by the in several different fault blocks north of Troy Canyon rapid progressive thickening of the low·er member east­ is a several-foot-thick bed of closely packed gray lime­ ward from the Arizona mine area on the spur between stone spheres in a brown sandy dolomitic limestone .Tackson and Buena Vista Canyons. Both the strati­ matrix. These spherical bodies, 10-20 mm in diameter, graphic relations and the paleontological evidence indi­ consist of an outer rim of fine-grained crystalline calcite cate that deposition of the lower member atop the Ari­ surrounding a coarsely crystalline sparry calcite inte­ zona basement high began after most or all of the thicker rior. Their size, slmpe, and compos it ion suggest Girva­ section of the lower member to the west, north, and nella-like algae >Yhose finer structme has been obliterated northeast had already been formed. by recrystallization. The highest brown-weathering South of Cottomvood Canyon, which limits the south­ dolomitic rocks of the lo,Yer member between Troy and ward extent of the Prida outcrops in the vicinity of the American Canyons are distinctive in that they contain Arizona group of mines, the lower part of the formation scattered granules and coarse grains of light-colored is not exposed on the east side of the range for nearly 10 siliceous Koipato fragments. Relatively coarse grained PRIDA :F10RMATION 13 terrigenous detritus also appears in this part of the Gymnotoceras rneelci Zone, occurs near the tap of the Prida in Fisher Canyon, where coarse-grained dolomitic member in the vicinity of Fossil Hill between South sa,ndstone locally forms the top of the lower member. American and Troy Canyons, where the middle mem­ ber is 150-200 feet thick, and near the middle of the 11IDDLE :MEMBER thi1mer section of the menliber in Fisher Canyon. Ex­ The middle member of the Prida Formation, unlike amined microscopically, 'the sandy detritus can be rec­ the lower member, is relatively uniform in lithologic ognized as rhyolitic debris, but partial replacement by character both vertically and laterally. It thickens pro­ calcite has completely obliterated the original grain gressively from a few tens of feet in the southern part botmdaries, and silica has been redistributed through­ of the Humboldt Range to several hundred feet in the out the rock in irregular patches of microc:rystalline northern part of the range as a result of the inclusion of quartz which may in places replace 'the original car­ older beds at the base of the middle member northward. bonate. The Star-Humboldt and Arizona basement highs, which The contact between the middle and upper members so profoundly influenced the character of the lower of the Prida is gradatJional through a few tens of feet member of the Prida in the northern part of the range, and is marked by transition upward to da,rker gray also affected deposition of the middle member. Three regularly bedded commonly cherty carbonate rocks tha!t hundred feet or more of the middle member along the generally lack argillaceous and silty interibeds. Where east edge of the range north of Coyote Canyon was de­ shearing and alteration is intense, separation of the posited before deposition of the middle member atop middle and upper members is difficult; in pla:ces on the these basement highs commenced. west flank of the range, no attempt was made 'to dif­ The middle member consists of laterally discontinuous ferentiate them on the geologic map. thin- and medium-bedded medium- to dark-gray lime­ UPPER MEMBER stone that rarely forms units more than a few feet thick The upper member of the Prida forms the greater and is interbedded with calcareous silty shale and yel­ part of the forma!tion throughout the Humboldt Range. lowish-brown or pinkish-gray very thin bedded calcar­ On the south 'vall of Fisher Canyon it is rubout 600 feet eous siltstone. Locally the limestone is highly fossilifer­ thick and forms about three-fourths of the entire for­ ous and formed in large part of more or less fragmentary mation. To the southwest in this same outcrop belt, both shells of and, in the higher parts of the the middle and upper members thin to a combined section, of the pelecypod Daonella. In weathered surface thickness of only a few hundred feet on the west side debris, limestone float predominates, but the interbedded of Black Ridge. North of Fisher Canyon the upper argillaceous and silty rocks actually form more than member inereases in thickness. It is about 1,500 feet t"·o-thirds of the section. Although the limestone is fine thick in Congress Canyon and may exceed 2,000 feet in grained, it is completely recrystallized; and the mollus­ thickness in the high, rrorthern part of the range, where can shell material is coarsely crystalline, even where the upper member forms nearly half of the total pre­ fossil preservation is relatively good. Tertiary outcrop a.rea. Five samples of black fossiliferous limestone from This disproportionate thickness of the upper mem­ the middle member in the vicini1ty of Fossil Hill were ber in the northern part of the Humlboldt Range sig­ included in the survey of carbon and oxygen isotopic nificantly changes 'the gross character of the Prida For­ composition of limestones by Keith and \iVeber (1964). mation from that at its type area in the East Range, and 13 12 Three of these samples had anomalously low C : C the upper member could properly be recognized as a ratios in comparison with average marine limestones; separate formation. This is noit done, however, because the other bvo samples showed the same tendency to a the lithologic distinction between the upper and middle lesser degree. Kerth and \iV eber suggested that the rela­ members is commonly obscured by secondary deforma­ 13 ti \'ely low C content of carbonate rocks of this kind tion and recrystallization, and these two units are not results from deposition in nn environment characterized easily differentiated in some par~ts of the range. by an abundance of decaying organic matter and re­ The characteristic rocks of the upper member are stncted circulation. thin- and medium-parted, conspicuously laminated me­ A conspicuous stratigraphic marker within the mid­ dium- to dark-gray limestone and dolomite with lenticu­ dle member in the f!o uthern part of the range is a unit lar st>ringers and thin beds of dark c:hert (fig. 8B) about 10 feet thick of massive brown-weathering me­ Repetiltious thin- to medium-parting units with some­ dium- to thick-bedded sandy limestone. This unit, which what undulating surfaces gi,·e most exposures a regu­ corresponds to 1the Gymnotoceras dnnni beds of the larly stratified appearance (fig. 7) . Interstratified with

310-683 0 -68-3 14 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWER MEtSOZOIC ROCKJS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NEVADA range thin-bedded dark chert locally forms continuous units as much as a few tens of feet thick within the upper member. Though megascopically the boundaries between the chert bodies and the enclosing carbonate rocks are sharp, as viewed in thin section they are ir­ regular and ragged, and both euhedra of dolomite and patches of carbonate are included within the chert. The chert is composed of microcrystalline quartz and evi­ dently represents reconstituted layers of original silceous organic-detrital material in some places and the replacement of original calcareous detritus in other places. Some thin chert Leds in the section in Congress Canyon contain abundant outlines of sponge spicules and radiolaria, but this is unusual; similar chert beds more commonly have only a faint internal lamination with sporadic clear round spots that may have been radiolaria. Dolomite euhedra in these layers clearly replace the chert: they tend to cluster along crosscutting veinlets, and they transect the original outlines of radio­ laria. In other places, particularly in the relatively thin section of the upper member in the southern part of the range, ghosts of originally calcareous pellets and shell

FIGURE 7.-0utcrop of dark lamina ted dolomite showing the fragments are preserved in patches and stringers of thin to medium-thick, somewhat undulating parting char­ microcrystalline quartz that represent selective replace­ acteristic o.f much of the upper member of the Prida Forma­ ment of local concentrations of relatively coarse­ tion. Near east front of the range north of American Canyon. grained calcareous detritns '"ithin the fine-grained laminated rocks. Some of these chert bodies accurately these rocks are thick and very thick beds of massive me­ retain the original depositional form of these organic clium- and coarse-grained organic-detrital carbonate detrital accumulations, and the lamination of the en­ rock that form units up to a few tens of feet thick and closing carbonate rock is bent around them. Others become increasingly arbundant towards the top of the were evidently infolded into the underlying carbonate member. These massive carbonate rocks are essentially layers as load casts and then trunc.ated before burial like those of the overlying Natchez Pass Formation, and silicification. which is distinguished from the upper member by the Deposits of sedimentary breccia formed of somewhat n.bsence of cherty laminated carbonarte rocks. rounded fragments of featureless carbonate rocks up to The lamination of the regularly bedded cherty car­ at least several inches in greatest dimension in a coarse bonate rocks results from the alternation of finely crys­ cEstic carbonate matrix (fig. 8A) are a significant, talline layers with very finely crystalline more though infrequent, occurrence in the upper member of carbonaceous layers. Though entirely fine grained, these the Pricla. These occur as discontinuous thick units and rocks are "·holly recrystallized. Detrital silt grains of are interpreted as submarine slide deposits. Locally quartz, chert, and feldspar are ubiquitous in amounts their emplacement contorted and broke the underlying up to several percent, and \Yi spy stringers and thin beds laminated carbonate rocks, as is shmn1 in the specimen of yellO\Yish brown silty carbonate rock are common in illustrated (fig. 80). This specimen is from beneath places, particularly in the southem part of the range. the slide breccia exposed at the summit of Fossil Hill. The distribution of calcareous and dolomitic facies in these rocks lacks any apparent regularity, and much of Both the laminated carbonate and the thin chert inter­ the dolomitization is evidently secondary, perhaps of beds were broken into angular fragments, implying hydrothermal origin. Scattered fine-grained dolomite considerable penecontemporaneous induration of these euhedra indicate partial dolomitization in places, but sediments. Some other isolated occurrences of contorted the rocks that are entirely dolomitic have a granoblastic bedding in the upper Prida are probably also the result texture. of submarine sliding and slumping, but in the northern Chert stringers and layers constitute at least several part of the range these are difficult to distinguish from percent of the section, and in the northern part of the the effects of the more general tectonic deformation. PRIDA F10RMATION 15

Discontinuous units of altered volcanic rocks form Coyote and Bloody Canyons. The presence of Subcolum­ a minor part of the upper member in the northern part bites 'Und species of Prohungarites place this fauna near of the range. Some of these rocks are obviously ex­ the top of the Lo\Yer Triassic and relatively high in the trusive, whereas others probably represent feeder dikes. Spat.hian Stage, the youngest of the four Lower Triassic Near Star Peak, amygda.loidal flo''" rocks and Yokanic stages recently introduced by Tozer ( 1965b, 1967). breccia locally form the highest part of the upper mem­ Among float collection made nearby from_ USGS ber and directly underlie theNatchez Pass Formation. Mesozoic locality MJ688, the Pr-oh~tnga-rites referred to Similar mafic metavolca.nic rocks appear at phccs on in ta!ble 1 as P. n. sp. "B:' is probably from a strati­ the west flank of the range from Echo Canyon north­ graphic level only slightly above that of locality M2360. \mrd at about the same stratigraphic leYel high in the It is like t-he species of ProhungaTites characteristic of upper member of the Prida Formation. The thickest the "Prohungarites beds" at Hammond Creek, Bear and most extensive of these volcanic units is exposed Lake Valley, southeastern Idaho (Bernard Kummel, intermittently for about 2 miles behwen Humboldt and written commun., 1965), the fauna of which has been Prince Royal Canyons in an eastward-plunging over­ listed by Kummel (1954, p. 187). The Subcolun~,bites turned syncline beneath the Humbolt City thrust. On beds of northwestern Nevada and the Prohungarites the north wall of Humboldt Canyon this unit exceeds beds of southeastern Idaho are t herefore regarded asap­ 200 feet in thickness and locally includes pillowlike proximate temporal equivalents by Silberling and structures up to several feet in size embedded in a limy Tozer (1968). tuffaceous matrix that ccntains poorly preserved marine Of significance for reconstructing the depositional fossils. The mafic igneous rocks that forms a large out­ history of the lower Mesozoic rocks of northwestern crop on the range crest about 2 miles north of Star Peak Nevada is the fact that ammonite species such as Pro­ is evidently an altered diabase now composed largely of hungaTites sp. "B:', Zenoites? sp. "A", and Subcovmn­ plagioclase and chlorite. Its contad cuts across the bites sp. "A", which occur in the oldest parts of the bedding of the Prida at a low angle, and it is considered Prida Formation, also occur a fe\Y tens of feet rubovc the to be a dike related to the extrusive rocks in the Prida base of the Tobin Formation at USGS Mesozoic locality or in higher parts of the Star Peak Group. M2565 near the south end of the . Hence, lo­

FOSSILS AND AGE cally, as in the northern Humboldt Range, the Prida Formation at the base of the "Winnemucca sequence" The age of the Prida Formation in the Humboldt of lower Mesozoic strata includes beds as old as the Range is \Yell established by ammonite and halobiid Tobin Formation at the base of the "Augusta sequence," pelecypod faunas. (See fig. 3.) Locally, in the northern contra.ry to the view previously held by Silberling and part of the range where its thickness and time span are Roberts (1962, p. 37) . Another fauna from UJbout the greatest, the Prida ranges from late Early Triassic to early Late Triassic in age; farther south, where its same stratigmphic position in the Tobin Format ion of deposition began later and where its upper part is the Tobin Range, but from lt locality :1bout 2 miles far­ supplanted by rnassiYe carbonate rocks of the N atche11 ther south, is currently being described by Prof. Ber­ Pass Formation, the Prida is wholly of Middle Triassic nard Kummel. Though this fauna lacks Proh~tngarites age. and contains a different species of s~tbcol~trnbites, it is In the lo\Yer member of the Prich Formation a.long otherwise generally similar in composition and is the northeast flank of the range between J-ohn Brown probably not much different in 'age. and Santa Clara Canyons, where this member is thick­ The N eopopanocerrts haugi fauna, represented espe­ est, most calcareous, and not too badly sheared and cially by "Hungarites'' yatesi and distinctive species of recrystallized, at least two distinct successive ammonite paranannitids, has been found in the 10\rer member of faunas occur. The older of these is termed the Sub­ the Prida Formation at se,·cral places along the north­ columbites fauna, and the younger fauna is that of the east flank of the Humboldt Range from Bloody Canyon N eopopanocems harugi Zone. The composition and stra­ south to ,the south side of Coyote Canyon. It occupies a tigraphic occurrence of these faunas, as '"ell as those consistent stratigraphic level within a few tens of feet from the overlying lower parts of the middle member, nre sho\Yn in table 1 and on pbtc 1. below the bro\Yn cnlcareous sandstone unit that forms The older fauna from the lo,Yer member is best rep­ the highest part of the lo,Yer member in this part of the resented by collections made from limestone concretions range. Hence, although it has not been found directly that occur at a consistent stratigraphic level about 50 above the Subcolumbites fauna, its position in the sec­ feet above -the basal clastics at USGS Mesozoic locality tion bet,Yeen Coyote and Bloody Canyons, where the M2360 and along strike for several hundred feet between carbonate unit of the lower member is H1ickest, is about 16 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOW:ER ME1SOZOIC ROCKJS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NEVADA

B PRIDA F10RMATION 17

TABLE l.-Compos1.tion and biostratigraphic assignment of the ammonite faunas from the lower part of the Prida Formation in the northeas­ tern part of the Humboldt Range [Location of USGS Mesozoic localities shown on pl. 1. X. occurrence o~ species·?, uncertain occurrence]

ANISIAN STAGE SPATHIAN STAGE

Anagymnotoceras varium Zone Lenotropites Neopopanoceras haugi Subcolum­ caurus Zone Zone bites beds Cll+> ::S·'"'o.:: C'l .... 0> 0> 0 <0 <0 t- 00 C'l r- .... 00 0 0 C'l C'l C'l ;:; <0 1Q C'l :'1) 0> <0 ~ C'l <0 <0 <0 ~.:: C'l C'< ~ 00 <0 r- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 <0 00 ""' "' 00 ""'00 00 ""'00 00 <0 ""';:; 0:. C'l C'l C'l C'~ C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l 0~ C'l N "'C'l "'C'l C'l "' "' "' 0:. "' "' "'C'l "' "' "'C'l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ------1------Pseudodanubites? halti (Mojsisovics) ______X X X ______---- ______Anagymnotoceras aff. A. mnderatum McL~arn______? X ______------___ _ Ismidites aff I. marmarensis Arthaber ______X ______? ______Czekanowskites hayesi (McLearn) ______X ______Longobardites nevadanus Hyatt and Smith______? ______? ? ______L. cf. L.larvalis McLearn______? ? ______X ? ______Acrochordiceras hyatti Meek------~------? ? ? ____ X X ______X ? ______------Gymn;tes perplanus (Meek)_------? ? ______? ______Cuccoceras bonaevistae Hyatt and Smith______? ? X X X ____ X X ______------____ ---- Hvllandites sp______? X ______---- ______---- ___ _ Dagnoceratid n. gen., n. sp. A ______X ? ______X ______---- ____ ------Isculites n. sp______? ? ____ X ______------

Lenotropites caurus McLearn______X X X X ------­ Acrochordiceras aff. A. americanum McLearn ______X X ? ? ------Isculitesmeeki (Hyatt and Smith) ______X X ------Leiophyllites? sp. A_------______X X Eophyllites sp. A______? X ? ______

8 ~~;fco,?o~:Ji~~~~~"Xenodiscus" bittneric1~~ii~~lea:1eaS~i~~~~~~======Hyatt and Smith ______======~X ====______======_ "Hungarites" yatesi Hyatt and sm·th ______X X X X X ______"Tirolites" pacijicus Hyatt and Smith ______X ______Metadagnoceras n. sp. ex aff. M. pulcher Tozer ______X X ? ______Isculitoides? sp. A ______X X X ______Paranannitid sp. B ______X X X ____ X ______Prohungarites n. sp. A_------______X ______X ______P. n. sp. B ______X ______Zenoites? sp. A_------______X ______X ______Prohungarites cf. P similis Spath_------______X P. cf. P. tuberculatus (Welter)______? ____ X Nordophiceras? sp______X ___ _ Subcolumbites n. sp. A_------______X X Stacheites cf. S prionvides KittL ------______? X Ussurites? sp_ ------______X lsculitoides sp ______X Arnautoceltites sp_ ------______--·-- ______X X

200 feet higher than that of the Subcolumbites beds such of theN. haugi Zone, which can be recognized as far as those at locality M2360. southwest as USGS Mesozoic locality M2823 near the South of Coyote Canyon, where the carbonate unit is 1nouth of this canyon, is apparently occupied instead by 1nuch thinner, the relative superposition of the Neo­ St~;bcolumbites beds, as at USGS Mesozoic locality popanocera/3 haugi and Subcolumbites faunas is ob­ M1164. To explain this, a disconformity within the car­ scure. In John Brown Canyon the stratigraphic position bonate unit here is postulated on plate 1. In support of this interpretation, the beds that would be separa.ted by this disconformity are quite different in composition; FIGURE 8.-Carbonate rocks from the upper member of the Prida the carbonate unit at locality M1164 is composed of Formation on Fossil Hill, in the southeastern part of the coarse-grained organic-detrital sandy limestone, range. All figures natural size. A., Dolomite sedimentary breccia from thick discontinuous unit interpreted as a sub­ whereas the N eopopanoceras haugi Zone a short dis­ marine slide deposit within the lamfnated thin-bedded lime­ tance farther northeast consists of well-bedded dense stone and dolomite of the upper member. B, Laminated argillaceous gray limestone. Moreover, locality M1164 dolomitic limestone like that which forms most of the upper is near the depositional margin of these rocks of the member. Sawn slab photographed in liquid to heighten con­ lo\ver member where they lap up against the Arizona trast between laminae. White patches are void fillings of sparrs calcite and quartz. Stratigraphic orientation of hand specimen basement high, and gaps in the section might be ex­ uncerta'in. 0, Weathered surface of brecciated and re­ pected here. cemented very thinly interbedded laminated dolomite (light Heretofore, the only kno\vn occurrence of the N eo­ colored) and chert (dark colored). Disruption of bedding attributed to emplacement of carbonate slide deposit that popanoce1'as hat~;gi fauna was in the Inyo Mountains directly overlies these rocks in the section. of southeastern , \Yhere it is not in close strat- 18 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOW:ER ME1SOZOIC ROCKJS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NE1VADA igraphic succession with other faunas. In the absence ammonite faunas occur in the middle member through­ of an adequate m~eans of dating this unique assemblage, out the range, but they are best developed in the south­ its age has been customarily regarded as earliest Mid­ east part of the range at localities such as the classic dle Triassic (Smith, 1914, p. 5-6; Spath, 1934, p. 35; collecting site at Fossil Hill. Arkell and others, 19·57, p. L124). Collections from The Anisian faunas of the Humboldt Range are dom­ the N. haugi Zone a:t USGS Mesozoic locality M2834 inated by cephalopods and by planktonic or probable near the edge of the Humboldt Range just south of pseudoplanktonic pelecypods; Posidonia-like forms and Coyote Canyon include most, and perhaps all, of the "8phaera" 'tohitneyi Meek are prevalent in the middle ammonites originally ascribed to it in the Inyo Moun­ Anisian whereas species of Daonella and "Rhynchop­ tains by Smith (1914) plus a few additional kinds. (See terns" obesus Gabb are well represented in the upper table 1.) Compared with the faunal succession found Anisian. With fmv exceptions, brachiopods and gastro­ elsewhere inNorth Alnerica, the relative position of this pods are scarce, and other kinds of larger marine in­ fauna in the Hmnboldt Range with respect to the lower vertebrate fossils are unkown. Anisian "Longobardites" cau.J'US Zone indicates that the Where the lower and n1iddle members of the Prida N. haugi Zone is approximately equivalent to the upper­ are thickest, in the northeastern part of the range, fos­ most Lower Triassic K yserlingites subrobu.stuB Zone sils have been found at several places in the basal beds of arctic regions (Silberling and Tozer, 1968). A further of the middle member just above the brown calcareous reason for considering the N. hau.gi Zone as highest sandstone unit that forms the top of the lower member. Lower, rather than lowest Middle Triassic is the recent In the vicinity of Star Canyon, as at USGS Mesozoic discovery of poorly preserved ammonites probably be­ locality M2364, an abundance of the ammonite E ophyl­ longing to the uppermost Lower Triassic genus l{eyser- lites sp. ''A" and the brachiopod Spirigera cf. 8. stolicz­ 7ingltes several tens of feet stratigraphically above the kai Bittner locally characterizes the lo,verinost few tens N. haugi beds in the Inyo Mountains. "l{eyserlingites ~ of feet of the middle member. No refined age signifi­ sp. indet." is, in fact, listed by Smith (1914, p. 6) frmn cance can be attributed to these fossils, however, and the the .V:. haugi Zone of the Inyo Mountains, but this iden­ ammonites found at other localities fron1 the same strat­ tification cannot be confirmed. igraphic level, though exhibiting appreciable variety, The middle member of the Prida Formation in the are wholly indeterminate. Humboldt Range includes perhaps the most complete In the same general area-for example, at USGS succession of Anisian ammonite faunas known any­ Mesozoic localities M2358 and M2828-a discrete am­ where in the world. These faunas have been partly de­ monite fauna characterized by lscuUtes meeki (Hyatt scribed by Gabb (1864), Meek (1877), and Hyatt and and Smith) and Lenotropites cau.rus (McLearn) oecurs Smith ( 1905), and they formed the basis for Smith's 100-150 feet above the base of the middle member. The monographic treatment of the Middle Triassic ma­ presence of t:he latter species and of associated speci­ rine invertebrate faunas of North America (Smith, mens of Acroclwrdiceras, which are closer to A. ameri­ 1914). These previous authors, however, gave little or canum McLearn than to any other described species, in­ no attention to the stratigraphic distribution of these dicates that this part of the section is in the L. caurus faunas. The research described here and in another Zone, which is typical of northeastern British Columbia paper being prepared by Silberling demonstrat€s the and is the oldest zone recognized in the Anisian of N ort.h existence of as many as 15 distinct, stratigraphically suc­ America (:Silberling and Tozer, 1968; Tozer, 1967). cessive, Anisian ammonite faunas in the middle member The next higher ammonite zone, to which the Cana­ of the Humboldt Range. In terms of biostratigraphic dian name Ana.gymnotoceraB 't'al'ium Zone (Silherling units that are more or less coordinate in rank with those and Tozer, 1968) is applicable, is as much as 150 feet recognized elsewhere in the Triassic of North America thick; it is distinguished by the best developed and most the beds characterized by these faunas are grouped into' widely distributed ammonite fauna found in the Prida five successive ammonite zones. Formation in the northern part of the Humboldt Range. In those places where the Prida laps onto topographic Lo,ver and 1niddle Anisian faunas are represented highs on the preexisting Koipato surface, the A. only in the nort.hern parts of the range, where the middle 't'arhnn Zone may occur immediately above whatever 1nember is thickest and has its greatest age span. Un­ rocks locally constitute the lower member. A way from fortunately, the preservation of fossils here is for the such basement highs, as along the east front of the range most part poor. o,ving to the generally transgressive north of Coyote Canyon, the lowest fossils of the A. nature of the Prida southward in the ran

In addition to the occurrences of A. vrrrium Zone n1onographed by Smith (1914), who treated them as a fossils shmvn on plate 1, other significant localities at single, stratigraphically equivalent assemblage. The which cephalopods of this zone occur are USGS Meso­ preliminary revision of their taxonomy and stratigra­ zoic localities M533, M969, M1180, M1181, and M1875 phic distribution by Silberling ( 1962) now requires on the east side of the range north of Unionville. some modifications, the n1ost important of which nre Some am1nonite species characteristic of the A. va­ ( 1) the recognition of Gymmotoceras rotelliformw as a J'iu'ln Zone in the Hmnbolclt Range (table 1), such as distinct species occurring belo·w, but intergrading Acrochordiceras hyatti Meek (not Smith and other au­ with, G. blalcei/ (2) the inversion of the Paraceratites thors) and perhaps Gymnites perplanws Meek, range clarkei and P. vogdesi beds and the recognition of a still through the zone; others are more stratigraphically re­ older level, the P. burcldwrdt i beds; ( 3) the combina­ stricted 'within the zone. Ouccoceras bona.e·uistae Hyatt tion of Gymnotoceras washbttmei and G. occidentalis, as and Smith, Longobardites cf. L. larvaliB McLearn, and first revised, under G. occidentalis,- and ( 4) the transfer I sculites n. sp. are evidently confined to the lower part of "Anolcites" fudongi and "A." gabbi to the genus of the zone, whereas Pserudodan1tbites? halli (Mojsiso­ N e1Jadites. vics), Longobardites nevadanus Hyatt and Smith, and Incorporating these changes, the sequenoe of upper Ozekanowskites hayesi (McLearn) have been found in Anisian faunal units recognized in the Fossil Hill are.a, its higher parts only. listed from youngest to oldest, and their grouping into The Anagymnotocerasvarium Zone is assigned to the zones, is as follows : 1niddle Anisian as recognized in North America by Sil­ Gymmotoceras occide·rdalis Zone berling m1cl Thzer ( 1968). It is regarded as older than N evadites gabbi beds the middle Anisian Balatonites shoshonensis Zone, the N e·vaditesfrnrlongi beds other North American ammonite zone assigned by Sil­ N evadites hwmboldtens-is beds berling and Tozer to the middle Anisian, but the two N evadites hyatti beds zones have not been found in str,atigraphic sequence. Gymnotoceras meeki Zone Up to the present time the B. slwshonensis Zone has been Gynvnotoceras dunni beds found only in the Favret Formation, which crops out Gym.notoce~as 1neeki beds in the and adjacent parts of north­ Gym_,notoceras ( Frechites) neva.danus beds western .Nevada southeast of the Humboldt Range. Gymnotocenu5 rotellifonnis Zone Some genera such as Am·ochordiceras and Longobard­ Gy1nnotoceras blakei beds ites occur in both zones but are represented in the B. Paraceratltes cncki beds shoslwnensis Zone by species N1at appear to be more Paraceratitesvogdesi beds advanced morphologically than those in the A. vanum Para.ceratites clarkei beds Zone, and some genera such as P1·oarcestes and Pty­ ParaceratUes b-nrckhardti beds chites, that range up into younger strata are found in the B. shoslwnensis Zone but not in the A. varium Some :£annal resemblance exists between the G. rotelli­ Zone. The 150 feet or so of the unfossiliferous beds that .form,is and G. 1neeki Zones and the typical upper Ani­ separate the A. varitnn Zone from the upper Anisim1 sian of Alpine Europe. The G. occidentalis Zone, how­ Gyrnnotoceras t•otellifonnis Zone in the northern Hum­ ever, is regarded as upper Anisian rather than lower boldt Range leave ample romn in the section for middle Ladinian because the typically Ladininn :ammonite Anisian strata correlative with the B. shoshonensis genus Protrachycerrus makes its first appearance in Zone. the next higher, Protrachyceras subasperum, Zone in the lowest beds of the upper 1nember of the Prida. Upper Anisian ammonite and Daonella fatmas are Although larger marine invertebrate fossils other widely distributed in the uppermost 100 feet of the than cephalopods and a fe,v kinds of pelecypods are middle 1nemiber of the Prida Formation in the Hum­ either scarce or absent in the middle member of the boldt Range, although nowhere are they as completely Prida, some other kinds of fossils do occur. Skeletal re­ developed and as well preserved as in the vicinity of Fossil Hill- between Troy and South American Can­ mains of ichthyosaurian reptiles are fairly common, yons. The upper Anisian section here is the type looal­ particularly in the beds containing the greatest concen­ ity for the Gy1n.notoceras rotellijor1nis, Gym,notoceras tration of ammonite shells. The specimens of ichthyo­ 1neeki, and Gy1n/n.otoceras occidentalis Zones of Silber­ saurs, including one nearly complete skeleton, described ling and Tozer ( 1968), which heretofore have been by Merriam ( 1908), are from the upper Anisian in the lumped informally into an all-inclusive "Gytnnoto­ vicinity of Fossil Hill. Fish teeth and spines, presum­ ceras zone" (Silberling, 1962, p. 153). These faunas were ably from localities in the 1nidclle member, have been 20 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWER ME1SOZOIC ROCKiS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NE•VADA described respectively by Wemple (1906) and Davidson of the Humboldt Range. The best of these faunas was (1919). Mosher and Clark (1965) reported that cono­ found about half a mile north of the Standard mine donts are abundant in the Gy1nnotoceras rotellifonnis, (USGS Mesozoic loc. M1186) and inc~udes Sag_ec~rr:s 1neeki, and occidentalis Zones in the vicinity of Fossil and Proarcestes along with trachyceratid and chonitid Hill and that the same assenrblage of species, which is ammonites. Unfortunately, the trachyceratids cannot be like that known frmn the Anisian of Europe, apparently positively identified, but their advanced sculpt"?-re ranges through all three zones. strongly suggests assignn1ent to Trachyoera.g s.s., winch The top of the G. oooidentali8 Zone roughly coincides is indicative of an early Karnian age. An age at least with the lithic transition between the middle and upper this young is substantiated by their association with members of the Prida Fonnation throughout the Hum­ clionitids; a still younger age is unlikely because _the boldt Range. In the vicinity of Fossil Hill and at a few bo-enus Sagecer'a8• is not known above the lower 1\:arnian. other places, as in the Arizona 1nine area, the lowermost few tens of feet of the upper 1nember are characterized NATCHEZ PASS FORMATION by primitive species of Protrachycera8 such as P. sub­ The upper part of the Star Peak Group in the Hum­ asperuJn., and by Daonella aff. D. ta.ram.ellii. These beds boldt R-ange is the Natchez Pass Formation named fr~m are termed the Protrachyceras S7tbaBperum.~ Zone and are exposures at Natchez Pass in the East Range. Massive regarded as earliest Ladinian in age (Silberling and Tozer, 1968). carbonate rocks characterize the Natchez Pass Forma­ tion but subordinate units of mafic volcanic rocks, ter­ Except for the P. S1.tbaBperuJn Zone at its base, the rige~lous clastic rocks, and impure li1nestones p~nnit its upper member of the Prida is poorly fossiliferous; subdivision into local members and map units. The throughout most of the n1ember the only fossils found lower age limit of the Natchez Pass varies from late are sc:attered specimens of trachyceratid a·mmonites that Ladinian in the southern part of the Humboldt Range are mostly fla.ttened, silicified, and generally indetermi­ to early l{arnian in the northwestern part of_ the range; nate. In the higher parts of the upper 1nember, however, the upper age limit is poorly controlled but 1s probably pelecypods closely similar to, or identical with, Daonella late l{arnian throughout the range. (See fig. 3.) lonuneli Wissman, an index :fossil of the Alpine upper Exposures of theNatchez Pass are widely scattered in Ladinian (uppermost Middle Triassic), have been found the Humboldt Range, and only those at the south end at several plnces. In Fisher Oanyon (USGS Mesozoic and at the northeastern tip of the range preserve a com­ loc. M3095) in the southern part of the range, these plete section of the formation. In the southern par:t' of pelecypods and an ·additional undescribed species of the range the Natchez Pass swings across Black Ridge Daonella occur about 50 feet below the top of the Prida. in a broad outcrop band that forms the south flank and In Congress Canyon (USGS Mesozoic loc. M907), D. cf. sum1nit of Buffalo Mountain, and scattered outcrops D. lmnmeli was found with a few poorly preserved am­ then continue nortlnvard along the southeast front of Inonites of the long-ranging genera Protrachyoeras ?, the range to Indian Creek Canyon north of Fitting. To Proarcestes, and Hurngarites about 600 feet below t1he the north, on the west side of the range a nearly com­ top of the upper member at about the level where thick plete section of the Natchez Pass forms a belt parallel­ interbeds of massive carbonate rocks become conspicuous ing the range front from Panther Canyon north to the within the Prida section. And at the northeastern tip Standard mine area, where the Natchez Pass forms the of the range, west of Nevada State Highway 50 (USGS upper plate of the Standard thrust. Structurally below Mesozoic loc. M1689), Daonella cf. D.lmnnwli again oc­ the Standard thrust, the upper part of theNatchez Pass curs in the upper member of the Prida within a few tens then forms the sole of the Humboldt City thrust and of feet below the base of the overlying N atd1ez Pass continues northward in a narrow' continuous band Formation. Although t1his species n1ay have an appreci­ beneath the Grass Valley Formation along the western able stratigraphic range, this variation in the amount of foothills of the range to a point north of Hmnboldt Can­ Prida section above its occurrence in different places yon. In the high, northern part of the Humboldt .Range (pl. 2) is great enough to indicate that the upper limit incomplete sections of theN at chez Pass form the Impos­ of the Prida is somewhat younger in the north-central ing limestone cliffs at the head of Congress Canyon, the part of the Humboldt Range than it is in the southern crest of the range in the vicinity of Star Peak, and the and the northeastern extremities of the range. sum1nit of the 9,275-foot peak (Santa Clara Peak) The youngest fossils in the upper member of the about 2112 miles north of Star Peak. And finally, the Prida are poorly preserved ammonites from impure Natchez Pass underlies most of the Mill City hills, the li1nestone beds associated with thin units of mafic vol­ line of the hills projecting northeastward from the canic rock high in the section in the northwestern part north end of the Humboldt Range. (See fig. 1.) NATCHEZ PAS:S FORMAJTION 21

In most of the Humboldt Range, the Natchez Pass Wherever exposed, the contact between the massive Formation is divided into two readily distinguished carbonate rocks that form the highest part of the informal members. The lower Inemher consists of cliff­ Natchez Pass and the Inetapelitic rocks of the overlying forming massive earbonate rocks that in the southern Grass Valley Forma1tion is abrupt; the two rock types part of the range interfinger with mafic volcanic rocks. are not interlayered, and the transition between them An abrupt change to nonresistant impure limestone takes place within a few feet. In most places the sharp­ marks the base of the upper mmnber, the higher parts ness of the contact between these bvo rock units with of which are again composed of massive pure carbonate different styles of deformation has been heighte.ned by rocks like those of the lower Inmnber. The slope-forming local shearing. impure limestone in the lower part of the upper member LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION in the northern part of the main range includes subordi­ As the lithologic units that make up the Natchez Pass nate amounts of both volcanic and terrigenous clastic Formation are not the same throughout the Humboldt rocks not represented in the equivalent part of the sec­ Range owing to lateral variations, the formation is best tion farther south. Otherwise, this distinctive unit is described as a whole in each of its principal outcrop very much the same in both parts of the range. These areas rather than in terms of its various lithologic members are not recognized in the structurally con­ subdivisions. torted, but probably complete, seetion in the Mill City In the southern part of the range, the Natchez Pass is hills, though a thick unit of terrigenous clastic rocks, readily divided into two members : a lower member of not represented elsewhere in the range, divides the massive carbonate rocks that complexly intertongue recrystallized carbonate rocks of the Nat chez Pass For­ with mafic volcanic rocks and locally include very sub­ Illation here into .two parts of about equal thickness. ordinate mnounts of terrigenous detritus, and an upper The relative proportion of limestone and dolomite is member that is wholly calcareous. The southwesternmost variable among the carbonate rocks of the Natchez Pass exposures of the· lower n1ember on the \vest side of Black Formation. In general the sections in the southeast and Ridge overlooking Packard Flat are predominantly northeast extremities of the range are more dolomitic volcanic flows and breccia in several units of varying than those in the northern part of the main range, but thickness interspersed with limestone units. The aggre­ nowhere does dolomite predominate over limestone gate thiekness is about 1,500 feet. Eastward across Black through appreciable thicknesses of section. In its pres­ Ridge, massive carbonate rocks form an increasingly ent form, much of the dolomite in these rocks is evi­ large part of the section, and from Cow Canyon north­ dently a secondary replacement of limestone and com­ ward along the southeastern margin of the range, they monly occurs as coarsely crystalline masses in areas of form nearly all of the member, which gradually thins shearing or fracturing. However, some finely and to about 1,000 feet north of American Canyon. From medimn-crystalline gray massive carbonate beds are also Cow Canyon northward, volcanic rocks are restricted to partly or wholly dolomitic and Inay have been primarily the highest part of the lower member and form a later­ enriched in magnesium. ally persistent unit several tens of feet to a few hundred The total thickness of the N atehez Pass Formation in feet thiek separating the thick section of massive car­ bonates below from the impure limestone of the basal the southern part of the Humboldt Range is about 2,500 part of the upper mmnber above. feet, the lower 1,500 feet of which represents the massive The earbonate rocks of the lower member, where not carbonate rocks and included volcanic rocks of the lower mixed with volcanic rocks are a monotonous succession member (pl. 2). To the north, the lower member pro­ of medium-gray, thick and very thick bedded limestone gressively thins to only several hundred feet by re()"res- . • b and dolomite, all of which is recrystallized, somewhat s~ve Interfingering \vith the underlying Prida Forma- broken, and pervasively veined with calcite. Massive tion, and, assuming an approximwtely constant thickness dolomite beds are generally subordinate except near the for the upper member, the total thickness of theNatchez base of the section in the vicinity of American Canyon, Pass in the north \vestern and high, northern parts of \vhere they a.re a major con~1tituent .. Some sugary masses of light-eolored crystalline dolomite crosscut bedding the range may be only about half that 20 miles or so and evidently follow zones of fracturing. Secondary farther south. From the high, northern part of the range recrystallization has largely obliterated the original northeastward to the Mill City hills, the formation texture of these rocks, but enough shel1y and echino­ thickens again at the expense of the underlying Prida dermal debris are commonly discernible to suggest that Formation to about 2,000 feet. This estimated thickness it formed an organic-detrital framework which may l . ' wwever, IS only a rough approximation because of the have been originally filled with sparry calcite matrix. deformation of the largely overturned section here. Both shell fraginents and matrix are now medium to 22 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOW:ER ME1SIOZOIC ROCKS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NEVADA

coarsely crystalline. Large isolated fragments of re­ smooth, evenly stratified brown slopes; it eontrasts crystallized Thecosrnilia-like phaceloid corals were sharply with the upper part of the mmnber, which is noted in several places between Fisher and Cow Can­ cliff-forming thick to very thick bedded massive gray yons, and poorly preserved silicified molluscan and limestone resembling that of the lower member. Each brachiopod shells are not uncommon. of these parts of the upper member is about 500 feet In the fault blocks of the Natchez Pass north of thick, and though the up,varcl change from one to the American Canyon, a bed several feet thick of "\veil­ other is completely gradational, they can be mapped rounded chert granules and pebbles occurs within the separately. The ·well-bedded brown-·weathering impure massive limestone and dolomite of the lower men1ber limestone in the lower part of the upper member differs about 400 feet above its base and forms a useful local markedly in texture from the medium or coarsely crys­ stratigraphic marker. This bed is crudely stratified talline organic-detrital massive earbonate roeks that owing to wisplike variations in the packing density of form the bulk of theN atehez Pass in most places. This the chert clasts; these clasts may be tightly packed with impure limestone consists of partly broken pelecypod, siliceous cmnent or sporadically scattered in coarse­ brachiopod, and gastropod shells that have been replaced grained organic-detrital limestone. by medium-grained mosaics of calcite and are sparsely Another siliceous detrital unit is associated, oddly to tightly packed in a very finely crystalline calcite enough, with the mainly volcanic section of the lower grounclmass which could be either an original calcilutite member in the vicinity of South Relief Canyon. This or a micrite whose recrystallization ·was perhaps arrested unit, which is about 20 feet thick and can be traced at a very fine grain size by clay-size terrigenous impuri­ laterally for about 1 mile in the upper part of the mem­ ties. The more coarsely crystalline components of the ber, resembles in the field some of the dark sheared vol­ limestone, such as the molluscan and brachiopod shells canic tuffs at other levels in the section. In thin section, and the fillings of shell interiors and fractures, com­ however, it is seen to he composed largely of quartzose monly have a conspicuous yellowish-orange limonitic silt to which the dark color is i1npartecl by interstitial stain that contrasts strongly with the olive gray or material that may be tuffaceous in origin. medium gray of the matrix. The nature and amount of The mafic volcanic rocks in the lower member of the noncarbonate impurity in these rocks are shown by Natchez Pass Formation in the southern part of the chemical analyses of bvo characteristic. samples-one range are a heterogeneous assemblage of dense or amyg­ from Cow Canyon and another from American Canyon. daloiclal nonporphyritic massive flmvs, breccias, and Their Ab03 content of about 1.5 percent provides an tuffs, in part intimately mixed with impure organic­ index of the amount of clay; Fe20 3 values are near 0.7 detrital limestone. The flow rocks and breccia clasts are percent. Si02 amounts to about 6 pe.rcent, part of which mainly yellowish brown or greenish gray and are com­ may represent quartz silt, although secondary micro­ pletely altered. The plagioclase laths of the groundmass crystalline quartz is more eonspicuous in thin section. are either albitie or ghosted by caleite and serieitic ma­ For comparison, the combined amounts of Al203, Fe203, terial and are mixed intergranularly with chlorite, and Si02 in analyzed samples of massive gray limestone calcite, epidote-group minerals, ferric oxides, and much from the lmver member of the Natchez Pass averages fine-grained "dust.~' No original mafic minerals are pre­ only a little over 0.1 percent. The calcitic nature of the served in the several specimens exarmined ·petrogTaphi­ impure carbonate rocks in the lower part of the upper cally. Amygdules, where present, commonly show a 1nember is indicated by the relatively low MgO content regular zoning. An outer rim of scattered opaque grains of 0.5-0.6 percent of the bvo analyzed samples. is bordered interiorly by microcrystalline quartz or The section of the Nat chez Pass Formation repre­ chlorite ·which, in turn, borders a central filling of sented by scattered and incomplete exposures in the coarse calcite or quartz crystals. A primary volcanic northwestern and high, northern parts of the Humboldt origin for at least some of the breccias associated ·with Range is generally similar Ito that in the southern part the flmv rocks is shmvn in thin section by devitrified, of the range. Two me1nbers of the formation that seem but clearly defined, glassy rims on the breccia clasts. to eorrespond to those established farther south in the Stratigraphie unity is provided the laterally variable range are recognized. The lower member, however, is and somewhat heterogeneous lmver member of theN at­ composed entirely of massiye carbonate rock and there­ chez P~ss by the overlying upper member, which is by differs frmn the lower member in N1e sou1thern pa'rt wholly calcareous and is constant in lithologie character of the range because it laeks volcanic and terrigenous throughout the southern part of the range. The lower clast1ic units and is much thinner. Above the highest beds part of the upper member is yellowish-brown and gray of dark laminated cherty limestone included in the mostly thin- and medium-bedded limestone that forms Prida Formation, the massive carbonate roeks that con- NATCHEZ PASS FORMATION 23 stitute the lo,ver member of the Natchez Pass thin to throughout. It 'veathers a medium gray, but in most only a few hundred feet in their northwesternmost expo­ places it is much broken and intricately veined with sures. The very thick bedded, or even unbedded, charac­ white calcite. Weathering of this vein material com­ ter of the lower Natchez Pass results in prominent cliff­ monly imparts a reel stain to the outcrops. Viewed for1ning exposures that conunon1y exhibit cavernous microscopically, the limestone is featureless and has a weathering. 1nedium- to coarse-grained granoblastie texture. On Where the lmver member forms the prominent cliffs weathered or sawn surfaces, however, patches of crys­ at the head of Congress Canyon, it is essentially a single talline white caleite can in some places be recognized as bed about 600 feet thick that dips gently weshvard. The recrystallized coarse-grained shell fragments and echi­ lower mmnber is also represented in the ·eliffs on the nodermal debris. "Rapid rock" chemical analyses of east flank of Star Peak (fig. 4), whieh from a distance samples from three different levels within the lower n1ight be 1nistaken as the nortlnvard extension of the member on the ridge north of Panther Canyon indicate clifflike exposure in Congress Canyon. Actually, the the high degree of purity of this carbonate rock. Com­ two exposures are in different structural bloeks; more­ bined pereentages of CaO, MgO, and CO::! range from over, the steep face of the Star Peak eliffs, instead of 98.7 to 9·9.3 percent. The MgO content for two of these exposing a section of the lower member, roughly par­ samples is less than 1 pereent; for the other sample, in allels the bedding of steeply inelined Natchez Pass and which dusters of secondary dolomite euheclra are evi­ Frida strata that have been bent sharply downward dent in t1hin seetion, it is 4.3 pereent. The prineipal frmn the equivalent nearly flat lying beds exposed above noncarbonate eomponents are silica and water. the cliffs on Star Peak. This abrupt downfold is thought The upper member of the N atehez Pass Formation Ito have resulted from eastward overriding on the Te­ is only partly represented in the northern part of the halna reverse fault, whieh is present at depth but is main range. Incomplete sections of its lmver part overlie truncated by the younger, Santa Clara and American the massive limestones of the lower member in three basin normal faults, whose trwces merge along the foot places: along the edge of the range from Panther Can­ of the cliffs. Above these cliffs, the relatively undis­ yon north to t:he Standard mine area, a1t the head of turbed lower n1ember of the Natchez Pass on Sta.r Peak Congress Canyon, and at Star Peak and southwestward is about 400 feet thick and forms conspicuous massive for about 2 miles along the crest of the range. Like the outcrops that eneircle the summit of Star Peak and the lower part of the upper memlber in the sot'fthern Hum­ high range erest to the southwest. Farther north, similar boldt Range, these rocks are mainly relatively impure eliffy exposures of the lower member form the summit and nonresistant li1nestone that is evenly stratified, thin of Santa Clara peak and cap the ridge to the north on to thick bedded, and brmvn weathering. In the higher the west side of the Santa Clara fault. In the superfi­ parts of the range t:hey tend to form poor outcrops and cially similar belt of craggy outcrops along the trace of smooth soil-covered slopes. The most eomplete section the Tehama fault, however, the rock is a tectonic brec­ forms the smn1nit of Star Peak, where about 500 feet cia formed largely of material from the upper member of impure limestone describes a shallow synclinal fold of the Frida Formati'on, though it may include some and grades upward into about 100 feet of massive thick-· n1aterial from the Nat.chez Pass toward the north end of bedded gray limestone that caps the highest pa:rlt of the this fault zone, where it passes m1der the alluvial fill peak. This transition from nonresistant impure lime­ of the valley. stone upward into massive gray limestone presumably Along the west front of the range, between Panther eorresponds to that which takes plaee within 1the upper and Buffalo Canyons and west of the Eldorado fault, Natchez Pass in the southern part of the range. If so, the lower me1nber of the Natchez Pass Formation is the thickne

to form a selfsupporting detrital framework. The criteria for subdivision into members cannot be utilized. matrix is finely crystalline calcite with very subordinate The bulk of the section is thick and very thick bedded quartz silt. Subtle grain-size differences between discon­ massive recrystallized dolomite and limestone inter­ tinuous laminae less than a tenth of a millimeter in rupted near the middle by a conspicuous unit of coarse­ thickness impart a faint lamination to the matrix and fine-grained siliceous elastic rocks about 400 feet calcite in some thin sections. The sporadically distrib­ thick. Within the N atehez Pass below this clastic unit uted quartz slit in these samples generally corresponds is roughly 1,000 feet of 1nassive gray crystalline dolo­ in grain size to the calcite grains of the lamina in which mite and limestone, and above it, as estimated from the they occur, which suggests that both the calcite and geologic map, is at least several hundred feet of thick­ the quartz were deposited as detrital silt-size grains and bedded gray limestone intercalated with n1assive buff­ that the limestone is a calcilutite rather than a recrystal­ weathering coarsely crystalline dolomite. lized micrite. In three chemically analyzed samples from Along the south edge of the prominent hill east of the ridge north of Panther Canyon, the amount of State Highway 50, the clastic unit consists of thick and Si02 ranges from 4 to 11 percent and varies proportion­ very thick beds of siliceous chert-pebble-and-cobble con­

ally with the Al203 content, which ranges fron1 0.8 to glomerate interlayered with siliceous quartz-chert sand­ 1.6 percent. Ferric oxide pseudomorphs after fine­ stone, argillite, and calcareous siltstone. Weathering of grained pyrite cubes are conspicuous in most thin sec­ the more argillaceous and calcareous beds produces a

tions; combined values of FeO and Fe2 0 3 range from distinctive moderate-reddish-brown (about lOR 5/6) 0.5 to 1.0 percent. The MgO content ranges from 0.4 to soil that contrasts strongly with the drab color of the 0.8 percent. adjacent weathered slopes underlain by massive carbon­ Discontinuous thick beds of grayish-red chert pebbles ate rocks. The limited exposure of this clastic unit on in a limestone matrix are a characteristic, though minor, the west side of Highway 50 is equally thick but lacks constituent near the base of the upper me1nber in all its siliceous clastic rocks coarser grained than sandstone isolated exposures in the northern part of the range. and contains correspondingly more interbedded calcar­ Also, in contrast with the same part of the section in eous siltstone and impure limestone, some of which in­ the southern part of the range, minor amounts of amyg­ cludes abundant shell fragments. This apparent trend daloidal mafic metavolcanic rocks and some ealcareous for the clastic unit to become more calcareous and to siltstone are present in the float from the poorly ,exposed contain increasingly fine-grained siliceous clastic mate­ sections at Star Peak and above the Congress Canyon rial westward can be observed for only about 2 miles cliffs. along the strike and hence may be fortuitous, but lateral The highest part of the upper member of the Natchez gradUJtion is at least suggested between this clastic Pass is represented by a few hundred feet of massive unit and the i1npure, somewhat silty limestone that gray limestone that underlies the Grass Valley Forma­ forms the lower part of the upper member of the tion for several miles along the northwest flank of the Natchez Pass at Star Peak and elsewhere in the main range and forms the sole of the Humboldt Oity thrust Hmnboldt Range. plate. These limestones are much contorted, sheared, FOSSILS AND AGE and recrystallized, and they are extensively silicified, Identifiable age-diagnostic fossils are scarce in the probably by hydrothermal activity, particularly toward Natchez Pass Formation despite the prevalence in it th~ south end of their outcrop belt, near the Standard of shelly detrital material as a rock-forming constitu­ m1ne. ent. The fossils on which the age of the Natchez Pass The third general outcrop area of the Natchez Pass is based have been described and illustrated in an earlier Formation in the Humboldt Range is in the Mill City paper (Silberling, 1961) and are therefore discussed hills that form the northeastern tip of the range. Here only briefly here. the Natchez Pass occupies the axial region of a 1najor The characteristic lov,,er Karnian ammonite Tra.chy­ overturned syncline and is correspondingly much con­ cera8 s.s., has been found about 400 feet above the base torted and broken. East of Nevada Highway 50 where of the formation in the northern East Range, and poorly it crosses the Mill City hills, further disruption of the preserved specimens tentatively assigned to this genus section has evidently resulted from local landsliding. and subgenus also occur in limestone intercalated with Despite these complications, a complete section of the Yolcanic rocks several hundred feet below the top of Natchez Pass seems to intervene between the exposures the lower member of the Nat chez Pass southeast of of the Prida and Grass Valley Formations, but the Buffalo Mountain at the south end of the Humboldt character of the formation differs sufficiently from that Range (lTSGS Mesozoic loc. M657). As upper Middle of theNatchez Pass elsewhere in the range that the same Triassic fossils occur in the Pricla Formation just below PALEOGEOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION OF THE STAR PEAK GROUP 25 the Natchez Pass in both the southern and the north­ that illustrates the lateral variation of these rocks in a eastern parts of the Humboldt Range, strata of both structurally continuous block that is more than 30 miles latest Middle Triassic and early Late Triassic age are long in a north -south direction. Some degree of east-west probably included in the lower part of the Natchez Pass control on the lateral changes apparent in the Humboldt in these areas. (See fig. 3.) In the northwestern part of Range section is provided by comparison with the other the Humboldt Range, however, where lowennost Upper principal exposures of the Star Peak Group farther Triassic fossils occur in the underlying Prida Forma­ east, in the northern East Range, northern Stillwater tion, the Natchez Pass must be entirely Late Triassic Range, and southwestern Tobin Range. 111 age. Several different lateral relationships among these A large marine invertebrate fauna, consisting of well­ rocks can be selected as having especial paleogeographic preserved natural molds in partially leached calcareous significance. These are: ( 1) the lateral variation of the siltstone, was collected near the stratigraphic base of the basal part of the Star Peak Group; (2) the interrela­ siliceous clastic unit that intervenes within the carbonate tion between the massive carbonate rocks of the lo,-ver section of the Natchez Pass Formation in the Mill City member of the Natchez Pass Formation and the thin­ hills (USGS Mesozoic loc. M265). Among a variety of bedded cherty limestone and dolomite of the upper pelecypods and cephalopods, the ammonites Paratrop­ member of the Prida Formation; (3) the relationship ites cf. P. sulcatus ( Calcara, of Gemmellaro) and Spi­ between volcanic and carbonate rocks in the lower mem­ rognwceras shastense (Smith) and the pelecypod Septa­ ber of the Natchez Pass Formation; and ( 4) the re­ cardia? are represented. These two ammonite genera are gional relations of the upper member of the Natchez characteristically late Karnian in age, and pelecypods Pass Formation. tentatively grouped under the name Septocardia are LATERAL VARIATION AT THE BASE OF THE STAR PEAK GROUP widely distributed in the Upper Triassic of Nevada and Upper Anisian ammoni,te faunas of the Gy1nnotocera.'3 other regions. The same bvo species of ammonites have rotellijor1nis, G. meeki or G. occidentalis Zones occur in recently been found several hundred feet below a fauna all of the principal outcrop areas of the Sta.r Peak characteristic of the Tropites dilleri Zone on Vancouver Group, and as these zones oceupy 100 feet or less of sec­ Island, British Columbia (Givens and Susuki, 1963), tion, they provide a useful datum below which varia­ and they may therefore be indicative of the oldest part tions in the basal pa.rt of the Star Peak ean be eom­ of late l(arnian time. Several of the pelecypods that pared from place to place. The greatest amount of Star occur in the siliceous clastic unit of the Natchez Pass Peak deposition predating these upper Anisian zones in the Mill City hills (.8eptocardia ~' Alectryonia, took place in the northern Humboldt Range, where as and Plamuwpsis) can also be recognized among the much as 700-800 feet of the Star Peak is of Spathian shelly debris in the impure limestone unit that forms (latest Early Triassic), early Anisian, and middle Ani­ the lower part of the upper member of the Natchez sian age. Impure ealcareous rocks of the lower member Pass in the southeastern part of the Humboldt Range. of the Prida Formation make up more than 400 feet of This faunal similarity lends support to the suggested this thickness. In the southern part of the Humboldt lateral equivalence of these two lithologically distinc­ Range, less than 200 feet of unfossiliferous strata, tive units within the Natchez Pass Fonnation in roughly divided between the lmver and middle mem­ different parts of the Humboldt Range, but definite bers of the Prida, underlie the Gym.notocera.rs 1'otelli­ correlation on the basis of these long-ranging genera is unwarranted. fonni8 Zone, and faunas older than late Anisian are On the north side of Humboldt Canyon (lTSGS not known to occur. The Prida below the upper Anisian Mesozoic loc. M1142), fragments of the pelecypod Halo­ ammonite zones in the northern East Range and in the bia occur in the highest beds of the Natchez Pass For­ northern near MciGnney Pass is gen­ mation; these beds consist of a few feet of impure erally similar in comi:)Osition and thickness to that in limestone transitional into the overlying Grass Valley the southeastern part of the Humboldt Range. Still far­ Forn1ation. These specimens have the morphologic fea­ ther east, in the southwestern Tobin Range, the Prida is tures of such species as H. superba and H. ornati.rsshna greatly thinned and is represented locally by only a few that are characteristic of late l(arnian strata. feet of terrigenous elastics and calcareous sandstone be­ PALEOGEOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION OF THE STAR neath massive carbonate rocks of theNat chez Pass For­ PEAK GROUP mation. Here, poorly preserved upper Anisian ammo­ Exposures of the Star Peak Group are scattered along nites occur in the impure calcareous rocks in the basal nearly the full length of the Humboldt Range, and a few tens of feet of the Star Peak Group. On a regional section: may thus be reconstructed, as shown on plate 2, seale, the base of the St1ar Peak Group is thus generally 26 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWER ME1SOZOIC ROCK!S, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NEVADA transgressive soutlnvard and easbYard away from the that of a cluster of rhyolite porphyry intrusives within northern Humboldt Range. the ICoipato that are clepositionally overlain by the Star For the 1nost part, the eroded surface on which the Peak Group; no other intrusive rocks within the Koi­ Star Peak Group was deposited had only 1ninor topo­ pato have been found in the northern Humboldt Range graphic relief, as evidenced by the basal clastic unit north of lTnionville. The Sheba and De Soto mines, of the Prida Formation, \vhich generally contains clasts which were bonanza silver deposits similar in nature no larger than pebble size and does not vary in thickness and stratigraphic setting to those of the Arizona group by 1nore than a fe\v tens of feet. In the Humboldt Range, of mines, are in the lower part of the Prida Formation h.mvever, smne large-scale local topographic irregul'ari­ in Star Canyon on the east flank of the Star-Humboldt tles are apparent and evidently have, an i1nportant basement high where the lower part of the Prida is genetic relationship to the mineral deposits of the area. partly cut out against the high. The nearest extensive exposures of l(oipato rhyolite porphyry are about 1¥2 As described previously, abrupt lateral variations in miles west of the Sheba and De Soto mines. How·ever, the thickness and composition of the lmver n1ember of Cameron ( 1939, p. 602 and footnote) mentioned that the Prida Formation in the northern part of the Hum­ the l(oipato rhyolite which underlies the basal Prida boldt Range delineate two distinet basen1ent highs which in the workings of the Sheba mine resembles "granite" rose several hundred feet above the adjacent pre-Star porphyry, and he recognized that these porphyryllke Peak erosional surface (fig. 9) . The n1ore southern of rocks are part of the l(oipato because of their apparently these, the so-called Arizona basement high, has the depositional contact with the overlying basal clastics shape of an elongate ridge trending somewhat west of of the Prida and the absence of contact effects in the north through the Arizona mine area, and it apparently nearby calcareous rocks of the Prida Formation. plunge's northward toward the forks of Straight Can- On Black Ridge, in the southern part of the Humboldt ~on. "B ecl -vmn. " Sl'l ver deposits. (Cameron, 1939, p. 594) Range, the extreme thinning of the Prida Formation hke those of the Arizona, Inskip, and Wheeler mines in might be due to a preexisting topographic high having the lo,ver part of the Prida Formation are apparently accentuated the more general southeastward thinning localized along the trend of this ridge. Moreover the . . of the Prida during regional transgression. Here, thin­ position and trend of the Arizona basement high closely' ning of the Prida is again associated geographically coincide with those of the ICoipato rhyolite porphyry \Yith Koipato rhyolite porphyry intrusions in the under­ intrusive rocks that form a string of disconnected ex­ lying roeks, and the silver deposits of the Relief mine posures fron1 Straight Canyon south to Cottonwood occur in the Prida Formation. Canyon. In most places, faults separate these silicic in­ trusive bodies 'vithin the J(oipato from the adjacent The eoincidence in location of topographic highs on strata of the Star Peak Group; but along the east side of the pre-Star Peak surface, intrusive rocks within the the large exposure of rhyolite porphyry at the head of l(oipato Group, and silver deposits in the basal part Peru and Jackson Canyons, small patches of basal Prida of the Star Peak Group strongly suggest a genetic re­ Formation rest despositionally on the porphyry, and lationship between these three features. The Koipato in­ about half a mile south of the vVheeler mine, the basal trusive rocks, being the oldest of the three, are thought Prida is in depositional contact \Yith a small exposure of to be the eontrolling feature. Evidently intrusion of rhyolite porphyry. Hence, although previously con­ these rhyolite porphyry feeder dikes and related rocks sidered of late Jurassic or early age (Canl­ into the J(oipato volcanie pile locally a,ffected its resist­ eron, 1939, p. 584), these rhyolite porphyry instrusives ance ~to erosion so that the intruded parts of N1e Koi­ clearly predate the Star Peak Group (Wallace and pato were left as topographic highs following the pe­ others, 1960). riod of tilting or gentle folding and erosion that pre­ ceded deposition of the Star Peak Group. The we1l- The Star-Humboldt basement high in the nortlnvest­ ern part of the range is disrupted by several large-scale faults that obscure its configuration. Lateral chano-es FIGURE 9.-Isopachs of pre-upper Anisian strata at the base of in the thickness of the lower part of the Pri'da the Star Peak Group plotted on the bedrock outline of the Formation suggest that the east flank of this basement Humboldt Range. Areas of minimum pre-upper Anisian thick­ high trends about north-south, roughly on strike with ness delineate topographic highs on the pre-Star Peak ero­ the .e~ongation of the Arizona basement high, but the sional surface of the Koipato Group and coincide geD,graphi­ positiOn of the other sides of the high is poorly con­ cally with the location of intrusive rocks within the Koipato Group. Traces of the depositional contact between the Koipato trolled. The Star-Humboldt basmnent high is evidently and Star Peak Groups are shown to indicate where in the broader and areally more extensive than the Arizona range the basal part of the Star Peak is exposed, and to high. Like the Arizona high, its location coincides with indicate the control for isopaching its thickness. PALEOGEOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION OF THE STAR PEAK GROUP 27

118°15' 118°00'

EXPLANATION

r Canyon Depositional contact between Koi­ pato and Star Peak Groups Hachures on Star Peak side

40°30'

Pre-Star Peak intrusive rocks within Koipato Group --too-- rizona basement --3oo-- high 100- and 300-foot isopachs of pre­ upper Anisian strata at base of Star Peak Group Dashed where poorly controlled

40°15'

5 0 5 MILES 28 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOW:ER ME1SOZOIC ROCKS:, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NE,VADA defined line;ar shape of the Arizona basemBnt high graphic relation to the widespread upper Anisian am­ seems to relate to the subcrop pattern of the l(oipato monite zones, which directly underlie the upper member rhy?lite porphyry on the pr·e-Star Peak surface, but the of the Prida, wherever present, or the lower member of unique occurrence of mafic volcanic rocks in the basal the Natchez Pass, wh,ere the upper Prida facies is ab­ Prida Formation along the west side of this basement sent, as in the Tobin Range. Within the upper Prida and high could also indicate that its shape and topographic lower Natchez Pass faunal evidence for contemporane­ relief results in part from block faulting during the ini­ ity is indecisive, but the available faunas strongly sug­ tial phase of Star Peak deposition. However, pre-Star gest that lower Karnian rocks are present in the higher Peak faulting within the Rochester Rhyolite would be parts of both units in different places. Thick interbeds of difficult to demonstrate here because of the heterogene­ massive organic-detrital carbonate rock like that of the ous, rapidly interlensing lithologic character of these lower Natchez Pass are conspicuous in the higher parts Koipato volcanic rocks, and such faults were not recog­ of the upper Prida in the Humboldt Range, and though nized in the course of geologic mapping. Long after the discontinuity of exposures prevents direct tracing of the Star Peak Group was deposited, presumably dur­ these beds into the N a.tchez Pass Formation, they prob­ ing the time of late Mesozoic intrusive a-ctivity, mani­ ably represent interfingering of the two :£acies as shown fested mainly by the granite exposed in the vicinity of diagrammatically on plate 2. Rocky Canyon, the Koipato intrusive rocks evidently The change in facies between the dark, laminated served as a source or -channel for mineralizing fluids that carbonate rocks of the upper member of the Prida and formed the "bed-vein," stockwork, and replacement sil­ the massive carbonate rocks of the lower member of the ver deposits in the lowest calcareous rocks of the Star Natchez Pass thus takes place within a largely correla­ Peak Group where they surmount the preexisting base­ tive package of Ladinian and lower Karnian strata that mentlllglis ·associated with the Koipwto intrusive rocks. thickens from about 1,000 feet on the southeast to more

FACIES RELATION BETWEEN THE PRIDA AND NATCHEZ PASS than 2,000 feet to the northwest; and the greatest total FORMATIONS thiekness corresponds in loeation to the thickest ~aeeu­ The upper member of the Prida Formation and the mu1ation of the dark la.minated earbonate faeies. lower member of the Natchez Pass Formation in the Several lines of evidence indicate that the upper Prida Humboldt Range represent a striking change of facies is an offshore, relatively deepwater deposit in compari­ within the Star Peak Group. As already described, the son with the lower Natchez Pass. The lamination and distinctive dark laminated cherty limestone and dolo­ even, thin parting eharaeteristie of the upper Prida mite of the upper Prida has the form of a thick wedge points to quiet-water deposition, as do the interealated whose lateral decrease in thickness corresponds to an ehert layers formed of fine-grained biogenie silica. A increase in thickness of the overlying massive carbonate foul-bottom depositional environment is suggested by rocks of the lower Natchez Pass (pl. 2). From its north­ the dark color of these rocks and by their laek of a westernmost exposures in the Humboldt Range, where shelly bottom fauna. None of the larger marine inverte­ its thickness may exceed 2,000 feet, the upper Prida brates that oeeur sporadieally as fossils in these rocks thins southward within the Humboldt Range to a wedge is known to have been a bottom dweller. Although quiet­ edge; to the east, in the northern East Range and near \Yater and foul..Jbottom eonditions are not necessarily McKinney Pass in the northern Stillwater Range, it restricted to deep basinal environments, an appreciable thins to only several tens of feet; and in the easternmost depth of water is implied by the existence of a paleo­ section of the Star Peak Group, in the southwestern slope sufficiently steep to have indueed slumping within Tobin Range, it is absent. Inversely, the lower N a.tchez the upper Prida and the disruptive mnplacement in them Pass thickens from only a few hundred feet in the high, of eoarse sedimentary breceias of massive earbonate northern part of the Humboldt R-ange to 'albout 1,000 rocks. A number of the laterally persistent interbeds of feet toward the northeast in the Mill City hills and to massive organic-detrital earbonate roeks within the dark aJbout 1,500 feet toward the south in the southern Hum­ laminated cherty limestone of the upper Prida were boldt Range (where it contains much volcanic rock earefully examined for graded bedding or any other besides the more eharaoteristic massive organic-detrital features indicative of turbidity current deposition, carbona:te rock); in the ranges to thB east of the Hum­ but nothing conelusive was found. boldt Range, the part of the Natchez Pass Formation The depositional environment inferred for the fea­ corresponding to the lower member is at least several tureless massive medium-gray limestone and dolomite hundred feet thick. of the lower member of the Natchez Pass is that of a Rartial lateral equivalence of the upper Prida and progressively subsiding carbonate bank on which a lower Natchez Pass is demonstrated by their strati- varied bottom fauna of eehinoderms, corals, braehio- PALEOGEOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION OF THE STAR PEAK GROUP 29 pods, and mollusks flourished under turbulent shallow­ and further elucidated by Newell, Rigby, Fischer, water marine conditions. Although the remains of sedi­ Whiteman, Hickox, and Bradley ( 1953) . Especirully Inent-binding organisms form a part of the recognizable analogous to the lo·wer member of the Nat chez Pass is biogenic calcareous detritus in the lower Nat chez Pass, the Victorio Peak Limestone, which is interpreted as in no place were they seen to form a selfsupporting reef­ a marginal bank deposit of organic-detrital carbonate like framework. Moreover, the progressive and gradual sand that interfingers with, and was built progressively nature of the thickness changes undergone by the lower basinward out over, the partly correlative black cherty Natchez Pass precludes the interpretation of any major laminated Bone Spring Limestone deposited in the mar­ part of it as an organic reef. This calcareous sand de­ ginal parts of the Delaware Basin. posit must have accumulated on shallow banks border­ RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VOLCANIC AND CARBONATE ROCKS IN THE ing the deeper, more offshore depositional site of the NATCHEZ PASS FORMATION upper Prida on the south and east. But through time, Volcanic rocks form only a small proportion of the sedimentation evidently exceeded the rate of regional Star Peak Group in the Humboldt Range except in its subsidence, and the shallow-water bank deposits of the southwesternmost exposures, where mafic breccias, flows, lower Natchez Pass were gradually built northwestward and tuffs supplant, by abrupt interfingering, most of the over previously deposited parts of the upper Prida in massive carbonate rocks of the lower member of the a regressive fashion. Nat chez Pass Formation. The stratigraphic relations of The depositional relationship between the upper these volcanic rocks are well displayed eastward across member of the Prida Formation and the lower member Black Ridge and can be interpolated northward, but to of the Natchez Pass, at least in its broader features, re­ the west and south they cannot be determined owing to sembles the basinward-shoreward facies changes recog­ the absence of outcrops in these directions. nized in some other marine carbonate deposits. Seveval The paleogeographic significance of this volcanic pile parts of the lower and middle Paleozoic section of east­ in the lower Natchez Pass of the southern Humboldt central Nevada undergo lateral westward and, in gen­ Range can be interpreted in two ·ways. It may represent eral, basinward change frmn massive dolomitic car­ localized recurrent volcanism along what was the shal­ bonate rock to more thinly bedded impure limestone low southern margin of Star Peak deposition where that is commonly laminated and chert bearing. The massive organic-detrital carbonate rock of the lower abrupt facies relations described by Winterer and Mur­ Natchez Pass was the normal sediment being deposited. phy ( 1960) between parts of the Roberts Mountains and Or it may have formed a submarine rise, perhaps Lone Mountain Form1ations in the part of this emergent at times, on which shallow-water carbonate section is particularly pertinent. In composition, en­ deposition took place in an area that was relatively off­ vironmental interpretation, and spatial relationships shore with re·spect to a generally north-south-trending these Silurian facies are generally similar to those rep­ shoreline. The increasing proportion of volcanics in the resented by the upper Prida and lower Natchez Pass. As lower Nat chez Pass southward in the same direction that described by Wint~erer and Murphy (1960) the fine,­ transgreSJSion took place at the base of the Star Peak grained laminated calcareous rocks of the Roberts Group in the Humboldt Range tends to support the first Mountains Formation contain a higher proportion of of these interpretations. The alternative interpretation terrigenous clastic material than is found in the upper is !Suggested, however, by the abnormally great thick­ Prida ; tJhe eastward transition of these rocks into mas­ ness of the lower Natchez Pass carbonate rocks adjacent sive carbonate rock is more abrupt and is attended by to this volcanic pile as compared with their thickness at more conspicuous interfingering of sedimentary breccias other places where they overlie a similar section of the and graded calcarenites; and organic reefs are thought Prida Formation but lack thick intercalations of vol­ to be mainly responsible for the thick accumulation of canic rocks. the massive Lone Mountain Dolomite. But these differ­ The Natchez Pass Formation exposed to the east of ences in fact or interpretation between the relations of the southern part of the Humboldt R.ange-near Mc­ the Roberts Mountains-Lone Mountain facies and the l{inney Pass in the northern Stillwater Range and in upper Prida-lower N a·tchez Pass facies are more in de­ the Tobin R.ange-is closely similar in composition to gree than in kind, and they do not negate the general that which crops out along the southeast edge of the paleogeographic analogy. Humboldt Range. The volcanic rocks are generally Also s~Inilar to the upper Prida-1ower Natchez Pass restricted to a single unit that forms only the uppermost relationship are some of the basin ward -shelfward hundred feet or so of the lower Inember. Recent field facies changes in the Permian rocks of west Texas and studies by H. C. Speed (oral cmnmun., 1963), however, New Mexico as described by King (1942, 1948, 1962) have shown that the area mapped as intrusive rock by 30 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOW:ER ME1SOZOIC ROCKJS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NE!VADA

Muller, Ferguson, and Roberts (1951) on the steep description of these rocks that the siliceous clastic unit east face of the Stillwater Range-fr01n about 10 mile's within the Natchez Pass here equates with the impure south of Mci{inney Pass south to Cottonwood Canyon­ limestone that forms the lower part of the upper is underlain, instead, mainly by rocks of the Koipato Natchez Pass farther south. If so, an abrupt change in and Star Peak Groups. The Natchez Pass exposed here lithology would again 1nark the base of the member. W'as found by Speed to include a 1nuch larger proportion Still farther northeast, in the type area of theN atchez of 1nafic volcanic rocks than it does several miles farther Pass in the northern East Range, this chain of litho­ north. Hence, in the northern part of the 8tillwater logic correlations becomes decidedly 'veaker. Siliceous Range, as in the Humboldt Range, volcanic rocks within clastic. rocks like those intercalcated with the Natchez the Natchez Pass evidently thicken abruptly to the Pass carbonate rocks in the Mill City hills here forn1 south. Unfortunately, as in the Humboldt Range, this one or more units as 1nuch as a few hundred feet in total change takes place in the southernmost outcrops of the thickness in the upper part of the formation, but be­ Natchez Pass, and the nature of the section still farther tween them and the overlying Grass Valley Formation south cannot be determined. But whether the southward is apparently only a few hundred feet of carbonate rock. increase in volcanic rocks seen in the Humboldt and Assuming a direct correlation of these siliceous clastic Stillwater Ranges represents transition of the Natchez rocks with those in the Mill City hills, evaluation of Pass For1nation into a widespread volcanic unit, or the apparent reduction in thickness of the overlying simply the presence of localized, randomly distributed Natchez Pass carbonate rocks must await more detailed volcanic piles within a predominantly calcareous section, structural and stratigraphic understanding of the East it constitutes a facies change whose bom1dary trends Range exposures. It should be emphasized, moreover, northwest-southeast, or about at right angles to the that the greater thickness attributed to the carbonate general north-south or northeast-southwest trend of the rocks above the siliceous clastic unit in the northeastern sedimentary facies-change boundaries within the Star Humboldt Range is little more than a guess and could Peak Group that cannot be related to vulcanism. Much be seriously in error. Hence, although the upper part of the north to south change frmn relatively deep-water of the Natchez Pass in the East Range may relate to to shallmv-water carbonate deposition displayed by the that in the Mill City hills, and these rocks may in turn lateral interrelation between the upper Prida and lower relate to the upper member of the Natchez Pass recog­ Natchez Pass in the Humboldt Range may therefore nized farther south, positive correlation is not yet relate to the shoaling effect resulting from contempo­ possible. raneous volcanie activity rather than to the paleoslope Despite these difficulties in recognizing the upper controlled by regional subsidence and by the erosional member in the more nortlwrly out:crops of the Natchez surfaee of the older rocks over which Star Peak Pass, :attention is drawn to the possibility that the up­ deposition transgressed. per member disconfonna:bly overlies the lower member REGIONAL RELATIONS OF THE UPPER MEMBER OF THE NATCHEZ of the Natchez Pass. '11his is suggested by the htterally PASS FORMATION uniforn1 lithologic nature of the upper Natchez Pass in Compared with the underlying parts of the Star Peak its more southerly exposures and by the sharp contact Group, the upper member of the N atehez Pass Forma­ separating it from the relatively heterogeneous and lat­ tion is remarkably consistent in composition throughout erally variable older parts of the Star Peak Group. Fur­ the southern part of its regional extent. It is generally thermore, the faunal evidence is not inconsistent with the same in the Tobin Range as it is in the southern the existence of a hiatus within theNat chez Pass Forma­ part of the Humboldt Range; in the northern Stillwater tion. The faunas in the lower Natchez Pass and upper Range it is the same in composition but is thinner. At all Prida that are tentatively dated as earliest Karnian oc­ these places it rests on volcanic rocks at the top of the lower member of the Natchez Pass, a·nd its lmver contact cur only a few hundred feet below the base of the upper is sharp without noticeable reworking of volcanic ma­ member of the Natchez Pass, whereas the late Karnian terial upward into the upper member. fauna from the Natchez Pass of the Mill City hills oc­ In the high, northern part of the Humboldt Range, curs just above the stratigraphic base of the siliceous the upper member of the Nat chez Pass seems to be clastic unit, which may correspond to the base of the up­ closely similar to that farther south in thickness and per member. The absence of upper lower I{arnian strata eomposition, but the incomplete nature of the exposures may thus be inferred, though biostratigraphic standards precludes positive comparison. Farther northeast, in the in North American are currently inadequate to suggest Mill City hills, however, the eorresponding part of the what proportion of the Karnian this omission might seetion is different, though it has been suggested in the represent. GRASS VALLEY FORMATIOiN 31 The decreasing rate of subsidence suggested by the feet. Exposures of the lower part of the Grass Valley progressive seaward deposition of the shallow-water Formation wrap conformably around the south-plung­ carbonate rocks of the lower Natchez Pass out over the ing anticlinal nose of Star Peak rocks at the south end upper Prida rocks may have culminated in a brief epi­ of Black Ridge from Packard Flat eastward to Cow sode of uplift and emergence prior to deposition of the Canyon. Farther north along the southeast flank of the upper Natchez Pass. Rejuvenation of bordering source range, the Grass Valley has been eroded away, but it is lands related to this uplift might then account for the preserved beneath the Cenozoic basalt flow between coarse-grained terrigenous clastic sediments that ap­ Dry Gulch and American Canyon, "·here it appears in pear in the upper part of the formation in its north­ the underground workings of the Hillside mine. eastern exposures in the Humboldt Range and in the Much of the Grass Valley Formation exposed in the northern East Range. Pershing district represents the highest several hundred feet of the formation repeated structurally and is GRASS VALLEY FORMATION atypical in "·eathering mainly to shades of red or orange The Gra.ss Valley Formation of the Humboldt Range and in having some interbedded calcareous rocks. The agrees in stratigraphic position, composition, and gen­ color difference between this part of the Grass Valley eral thickness with the typical exposures of the forma­ section and the underlying parts is partly a hydrother­ tion in the northern East Range (Ferguson and others, mal effect, but it may also reflect some primary compo­ 1951). In the Humboldt Range, as in the East Range, sitional difference. On strike '"ith the red- and orange­ the greater part of the Grass Valley is dark argillite, weathering Grass Valley exposures in the Pershing dis­ slate, and phyllite interlaminated in part with mica­ strict me similar pelitic and sandy rocks in the small ceous siltstone or very fine gl''ained sandstone, all of portion of the 1Vest Humboldt Range included within which characteristically weathers to olive gray or a the Buffalo Mountain quadrangle, but the full extent of similar color. Subordinate interbedded units of sand­ the Grass Valley in the vVest Humboldt Range is stone as much as several tens of feet thick form occa­ unknown. .sional dark craggy outcrops on the otherwise smooth, The upper contact of the Grass Valley Formation with rounded slopes 1mdedain by these rocks. Owing to the the overlying carbonate rocks of the Dun Glen Forma­ lithologioally repetitious, poorly exposed, unfossihf­ tion in the Pershing district is gradational; the highest erous, and structurally complex nature of these rocks, argillaceous and sandy beds of the Grass Valley are their true thickness and detailed stratigraphic succes­ calcareous in part and include lenticular beds of lime­ sion is indeterminate. stone. On the geologic map, the upper limit of the Grass Valley is arbitrarily placed at the base of the lowest In the northern part of the Humboldt Range the lateraJJy persistent carbonate unit on each of the differ­ Grass Valley Formation crops out extensively in the ent strike ridges where the Grass Valley- Dun Glen low hills along the north west flank of the range from transitional contact is exposed. As the main body of Dun the Standard mine area north to Imlay Canyon. Along Glen carbonate rocks probably bears a complex lateral with the highest beds of the underlying Natchez Pass relation to the similar, discontinuous carbonate beds in Formation, t he incomplete Grass Valley section here the uppermost Grass Valley, t he formational boundary forms the upper plate of the Humboldt City thrust as dram1 probably Yaries somewhat in stratigraphic and has overridden older parts of the Star Peak Group. level from place to place. Allowing for unrecognized faults and small-scale folds, probably much more abundant than is evident, a few LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION thousand feet is a reasonable estimate for the exposed Most of the Grass Valley Formation is formed of thickness of the Grass Valley Formation. At the north­ metapelitic, silty, and sandy rocks that represent the east end of the Mill City hills, a few hundred feet of same general source of sediment supply and differ lowest Grass Valley rocks overlie the Natchez Pass mainly in the degree of sorting and in metamorphic Formation in the axial region of a major overturned effects. These rocks are largely noncalcareous and lack syncline. interbedded carbonate rocks; exceptions are the high­ At the southern tip of the Humboldt Range the est parts of the formation transitional into the over­ Grass Valley Formation underlies most of the Pershing lying Dun Glen Formation. Terrigenous detrital mining district and the low hills bordering the south material coarser than medium-grained sand is absent. end of Black Ridge. Although both the lower and upper The finer grained pelitic and silty rocks make up hYo­ boundaries of the formation are exposed, an indeter­ thirds or more of the section and include slate, phyllite, minate amount of the section may be cut out structur­ argillite, and micaceous siltstone. All these rocks are ally. The minimum estimated thickness is about 2,000 black, or nearly so, in fresh exposures, but weather 32 STRATIGRAPHY l. 16, fig. Relief fault. These rocks differ in appearance from the 0) . main body of the Grass Valley elsewhere in the range. Pelitic rocks predominate, as they do throughout the formation, but their we,athering colors are chiefly light shades of orange and reel, generally in the range from yellowish gray through grayish orange to pale reel. Both brittle-fracturing argillites and slates are repre­ sented as well as some "soft" flaky "shale." Interbedded in subordinate amounts are clean pinkish-gray (com­ monly 5YR 7/1) cal-careous ,sandstone and discontin­ uous units of limestone. Some of the limestone is in mas­ sive gray beds much like those of the overlying Dun Glen Formation; other units are impure and weather light brown, and some nre nodular mixtures of gray limestone in brown calcareous sandstone. Marine fossils occur in the stratigraphically higher of these calcareous inte1'becls. Although these deformed upper Grass Valley rocks have a rather large outcrop area, their thickness prob­ ably amounts t·o only several hundred feet. In the up­ right and apparently continuous Grass Va.Iley section southwest of the anticlinal axis that runs through the Hollywood mine area, the transition from the more characteristic dark metapelites and associated sand­ stones up into the overlying gmyish-orange-weather­ FIGURE 11.-Linguoid ripple marks on the top surface of an impure sandstone bed in the Grass Valley Formation. Pencil ing pelitic rocks with some interbedded limestone takes point is in the direction of current. Same locality as figure 10. place about 700 feet below the top of the formation. 34 STRATIGRAPHY rOF THE LOWER ME1SOZOIC ROCK,S, HUMBOLDT RANGE, )rEVADA

The reason 'vhy the pelitic rocks in the Pershing dis­ paleogeographic interpretation, they were formed by trict 'veather predominantly orange and red, as com­ currents different from those that deposited the noncal­ pared with the dark-olive or greenish-gray color of the careous impure sandstones lower in the section. pelitic rocks in other parts of the Grass Valley section, is In the northwestern part of the Humboldt Range, in not fully understood from the data at hand. As seen in the Imlay quadrangle, some slate and slaty siltstone favorable exposures, such as in mine "·orkings and deep of the Grass Valley Formation along the range front gullies, the orange color results from weathering of immediately north of Humboldt Canyon weathers red­ originally dark-colored pclite. The fe"· samples of these broYn1 (lOR 5/ 4 and similar sha.des) and includes string­ orange-,veathering rocks analysed by X-ra.y diffraction ers of calcareous siltstone and very fine grained calca­ have kaolin and illite as their principal sheet-structure reous sandstone. By analogy with the stratigraphic minerals, whereas the dark-gree.nish-gray-"·eathering level of similar rocks in the southern part of the range, pelites are chlorite-bearing. Thus, the difference in these red-weathering calcareous beds may be near the weathering color may be related to the difference in com­ top of the formation. position. The chlorite in the dark-weathering pelites, Farther south along the northwestern range front, be­ though probably largely recrystallized, must represent, tween Humboldt and Johnson Canyons, the Grass Val­ some original ferromagnesian constituent such as fine­ ley rocks in a belt about 2 miles long and as much as one­ grained detri,bal chloritic or biotitic material that was half mile wide have been extensively altered, evidently either absent or has been altered in the clay-bearing, by hydrothermal activity. The eastern boundary of this nonchloritic, light-weathering rocks. Alteration by per­ alteration zone is abrupt and to the north, toward Hum­ vasive hydrothermal activity is a strong possibility, and boldt Canyon, it apparently coincides with a fault rec­ in places net"·orks of fractures crosscutting the orange­ ognized within the Grass Valley Formation. Northward weathered rocks are bordered by bands of red-wenthered along strike the altered Grass Valley passes into the rock a fraction of an inch "·ide, ·clearly indicating the dark metapelites and sandstones characteristic of most alteration nature of the orange to red color change. of the formation. Within the altered zone the finer Nevertheless, some primary compositional control of grained parts of the section have been transformed into the light-"·eathering charaoteristic is suggested by the structureless dense aphanitic rocks that commonly have essentially stratigra-phic nature of its boundaries. \iVh ere light-gray and pale-red concentric color banding. In the transition beh'i·een dark-weathering and light­ places they are further altered by bleaching and silicifi­ weathering metapelites is exposed near the Hollywood cation. Sandstone units can be recognized, but the usual mine, it roughly parallels bedding, and in the north­ metapelitic micaceous and chloritic interstitial material western part of the Pershing district, dark-greenish­ of the sandstone has been altered to ferric oxide and gray slate and argillite forms a distinct stratigmphic clay. unit at the top of the Grass Valley and separates the AGE orange-weathering rocks below from the overlying Fossils other than traces of plant remains are un­ Dun Glen Formation. Furthermore, orange and red known in the Grass Valley Formation except in its weathering generally coincides with the calcareous part uppermost beds, which are transitional into the over­ of the section to which marine fossils are restricted in lying Dun Glen Formation, and these occurrences are the Humboldt Range and elsewhere, as in the northern treated in the discussion of the Dun Glen Formation. Stillwater Range. J,t seems unlikely that a difference As upper ! fauna occur in the upper part of in depositional environment could explain the presence the underlying Natchez Pass Formation and lower of clays instead of chlorite in these rocks, m1d this prob­ middle Norian faunas characterize the uppermost Grass lem remains unsolved. But orange and red "·eathering Valley and the Dun Glen Formation, the age of the might result from some other minor constituent unique to the marine calcareous part of the section-for ex­ ample, an iron-bearing carbonate mi1ieral that has heen FmuRE 12.-Sedimcntary structures on the bottom surfaces of removed by subsequent leaching. sandstone slabs from the upper part of the Grass Valley At two different localities in the upper Grass VaUey ll'ormation in the Pershing- district at the south end of the Humboldt Rang-e. All reduced to one-half natural size. A, Formation of the Pershing district, flute casts (figs. Flute casts from locality auout one-third of a mile northeast 12A, B) were found on the soles of thin or Yery thin of the HollyiYood mine. Current direction toward lower left. beds of somewhat calcareous, but relatively poorly B, Small-scale f!ute casts from locality on the south side of sorted, sandstone intercalated with orange or red pelitic South Relief Canyon in the central part of sec. 29, T. 27 N., R 34 E. Current direction tOIYard lower left. a, Lood casts rocks. These are the only known occurrences of these from locality about one-tenth of a mile southwest of the structures in the formation, and as discussed under Hollywood mine. GRASS VALLEY FORMATION 35 36 STRATIGRAPHY 'OF THE LOWER ME1SOZOIC ROCKiS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NE,VADA Grass Valley is bracketed between fairly narrow limits. sist of quartzose, somewhat albitic silt and sand, con­ It is mainly early Norian in age, but includes strata of spicuous amounts of micaceous material, and g~eater early middle Norian age at its top and may include than normal amounts of relatively stable heavy min­ strata of latest Karnian age at its base. (See fig. 3.) ends; ( 3) terrigenous clastic sediment, coarser than medium sand is generally absent; ( 4) first-cycle volcanic PALEOGEOGRAPHIC INTERPRETATION debris is not a, significant constituent; and (5) cross­ The paleogeographic interpretation of the Grass bedded rather than graded sandstones predominate, Valley Formation has far-reaching significance because suggesting sedimentary transport mainly by tractional it bears on the depositional history of the much larger, _bottom currents. In addition to these generalities, where lithologically similar body of strata of which it is a carbonate units are sporadically intercalated in the part. The Grass Valley forms the base of a thick wide­ section the units commonly bear evidence of shallow­ spread assemblage composed mainly of fine-grained water deposition such as the local abundance of oyster­ terrigenous clastic rocks that range from middle Late like pelecypods or the presence of hermatypic corals, Triassic to Early Jurassic in age. These rocks, which Coraline algae, or stromatolites. crop out at a number of places in Pershing County Regional analysis of specific parts of this thick as­ and eastern Humboldt County, overlie the Star Peak semblage is complicated by problems of correlation Group and form the upper part of the ""Winnemucca caused by the lateral and vertical repetition of similar sequence" of Silberling and Roberts (1962). Some units rock types, the structural complexity and metamor­ of carbonate rock, such as the Dun Glen Formation, phism in some outcrop areas, and the scarcity of age­ occur within this predominantly pelitic and sandy as­ diagnostic fossils. The Grass Valley Formation, be­ semblage, but even though their thickness may locally cause it is at the base of this assemblage and is locally amount to several hundred foot or more, they form only overlain by the distinctive carbonate rocks of the Dun a small proportion of the whole. Glen Formation, is the only terrigenous clastic part of this assemblage that can yet be recognized as a discrete In tl~e Humboldt ~ange and the nearby ranges to the east this assembhtge 1s represented by the Grass Valley, natural unit in several adjacent mountain ranges. Dun Glen, vVinnemucca, and Raspberry Formations a.nd Lateral change within the Grass Valley is pronounced some unassigned strata in isolated exposures. Although among its principal exposures, which are restricted to an uninterrupted sequence of these formations, "·hich either end of the Humboldt Range, the northern East bel~ng mainly to the Upper Triassic, is not preserved, Range, northern Stillwater Range, and the Tobin thmr aggregate thickness is a:t least several thommnd Range. The thickness of the formation and its composi­ feet. W'"ith the addition of similar stratn that probably tion in terms of the proportions of generalized rock represent higher parts of the section in the West Hum­ types at these different places is compared in figure 14 boldt Range and Eugene Mounta,ins, the total original by means of pie diagrams. For the more northerly and thickness of this assemblage in the vicinity of the Hum­ westerly exposures, where the detailed internal stratig­ boldt Range was probably much greater. raphy of the formation cannot be determined, N1ese The thickest and most complete known section of diagrams are only estimates. Nonetheless, they are these rocks is that described by Compton (1960) in the meaningful for the purpose of gross comparison in vie''" Santa Rosa Range about 60 miles north-northeast of the of the strong differences between these exposures and Humboldt Range. This section has a thickness of at those farther southeast. least 20,000 feet. The lowest exposed part of this section The easternmost. exposures of the Grass Valley For­ is assigned to the Grass Valley Formation; succes­ mation are in the Tobin Range, where it is about 1,700 sively higher units were assigned by him to the Win­ feet thick and consists mainly of light-colored clean nemucca, O'Neill, Singas, Andorno, rrnd Mullinix calcareous sandstone. Limestone forms a minor propor­ Formations. Except for minor amounts of calcareous tion and is represented for the most part by one or m

A

B I

c 38 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWER MESOZOIC ROCK,S., HUMBOLDT RANGE, NEVADA

<( Seven outcrops w /.LJ • ~ (9 0 ' 0 z z <( 2:: 0 (f) ct <:( cr 1- 0 -1 I- 0 m (/) ~ <:( ::::> /.LJ I I.J..J (!) ~ EXPLANATION

TH ICKN ESS, IN FEET : ~ 2500 Limestone

2000 N 1500 Pelitic rocks 1000

....j ~5±£:1.3 0 ....j Impure sandstone 0 lOMILES f....- (/) Clean sandstone GR.A!SS VALLE:Y FORMATION 39 units of marine shelly detritus near the middle of the Impure sandstones of the kind discussed in the de­ section. IntBrbedded units of argillaceous rocks are in­ scription of the Grass Valley of the Humboldt Range conspicuous. The predominant sandstone is thick bedded are a subordinate, but distinctive, part of the pelitic and :forms homogeneous units up to a few tens of feet sections in the Humboldt and East Ranges and are re­ thick that are distinguished frmn adjacent similar units stricted to them. Prevalence of strongly directionallin­ by subtle differences in grain size, ceinentation, and guoid ripple marks is characteristic of these impure bedding characteristics. Large-seale planar crossbedding sandstones, together with their consistent composition, is eharacteristic of most beds, and fossil auricarian logs very fine grain size, and occurrence in discontinuous are not uncommon near the top of the formation. The sets of thin beds. Current directions were determined s~dimentary environment suggested hy these rocks is from these ripple marks wherever possible in the that of a beach or nearshore marine bar. Similar rOiCks Humboldt Range, as well as in the vicinity of Dun tha;t are approximately correlative, and evidently were Glen Canyon in the East Range, and are plotted in deposited under much the same conditions, are included figure 14 in 15° class intervals as rose diagrams around in the Osobb Formation, whose typieal exposures are the peripheries of the pie diagrams for these localities. in the Augusta Mountains about 20 Iniles south of the In general, the orientation of ripples on successive beds Grass Valley exposures in the Tobin Range. shows no perceptible difference, and each observation The exposures of the Grass Valley next west from plotted represents the single current direction estimated the Tobin Range are in the northern Stillwater Range, visually for all the beds at one locality. In restoring where the formation is only about 1,300 feet thick. Ap­ these measurements to the horizontal-in some instances proximately the upper half of the section here is similar from an overturned position-folding was assumed to to the Grass Valley of the Tdbin Range in being com­ have been a:bout horizontal axes. Unfortunately, local­ posed predominantly of well-washed light-colored cal­ ities where the bedding surfaces are exposed well enough careous sandstone with subordinate interbedded units of that the sense of current direction of the linguoid rip­ limestone and argillaceous rocks. The lower part of the ples oan be estimated directly are few. Nonetheless, the section, however, is noncalcareous pelitic rock with some number of observations is sufficiently large, in view of siltstone and sandstone. the strong grouping of the observed current directions Compared with these exposures in the Tobin and around a general west-northwest trend, to indioate that Stillwater Ranges, the Grass Valley Formation in the their distribution differs from a uniform distribution at Humboldt Range and the northern East Range farther a high level of significance. The magnitude of the result­ \vest and north, differs greatly in thickness and eomposi­ ant vector, based on the combined observations from the tion. In these places, it is ·dbviously thicker, although East Range and northern Humboldt Range, is about 93 accurate measurement is not possible, and is largely com­ percent. This northwesterly current direction is sea­ posed of nonealcareous dark -colored pelitic rocks and ward and approximately perpendicular to the shore­ impure siltstone and sandstone. Clean sandstones are line that would be inferred from the general distribution poorly represented, and the minor proportion of lime­ and character of Middle and Upper Triassic rocks in stone is restricted to the highest part of the section. northwestern Nevada. Thus, alt110ugh it is everywhere largely a fine-grained Also a part of the predominantly pelitic facies of the clastic formation sandwiched between the shallow-wa­ Grass Valley Formation, though less common than the ter marine carbonate rocks of the Natchez Pass and Dun impure sandstones, are the occasional laterally pe~ist­ Glen Formations, the Grass Valley undergoes a nearly ent units of well-washed light-colored sandstone. These complete change in character within a lateral distance clean sandstones tend to be massive but show some pri­ of a few tens of miles. mary sedimentary structures-either planar internal la.mination or crossbedding related to symmetrical oscil­ FIGURE 14.-Thickness, composition, and _paleocurrent directions lation ripple marks. Where measured in one pa,rt of of the Grass Valley Formation in the Humboldt Range and the northern Humboldt Range, the crests and troughs nearby ranges to the east. Solid black areas show the map of oscillation ripples, restored to the horizontal about a distribution of the principal Grass Valley exposures, for each presumed horizontal fold axis, strike uniformly north~ of which the thickness and composition of the formation· is represented by the adjacent pie diagram. Current directions east, or at about right angles to the current direction based on sedimentary structures-primarily linguoid ripple indicated by the linguoid ripples of the impure sand­ marks-of the thin-bedded impure sandstone units are plotted stone beds in the same outcrop area. as rose diagrams on the outside of the pie diagrams. The Interpretation of the Grass Valley Formation as part length of each 15° arc on the rose diagrams 'is proportional to the number of separate observations that fall within thnt of a near-shore deltaic complex is thought to best fit its arc. combined characteristics and is in context with its role 40 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWiER ME1SOZOIC ROCKIS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NEVADA as one pa.rt of a much larger assemblage of simila.r fine­ of which are known to have been alluviated areas of low grained terrigenous clastic sedimentary rocks. The rela­ relief at this time, found access through northern N e­ tively thick noncalcareous unfossiliferous pelitic sec­ vada to the se

Humboldt Range and in the northern Stillwater Range stone are locally well represented. Although bedding in which the upper part of the Grass Valley is calcareous within the formation is commonly contorted and the for an appreciable stratigraphic distance below the Dun carbonate rocks are much fractured and veined with Glen Formation. Where the Dun Glen is absent, there is, calcite, recrystallization is generally not megascopically in fact, no means of recognizing formational bounda­ apparent. ries that would precisely correspond genetically to those Most of the limestone is superficially sin1ilar in as­ established in the typical succession of these formations pect and is either entirely fine grained in appearanee or near Winnemucc.a, and in such areas these formational fragmental with a fine-grained matrix. The matrix con­ names probably should not be used. sists of very finely crystalline (0.005-0.01 mm) equi­ The Dun Glen Formation in the Pershing district granular calcite that has been recrystallized from either crops out discontinuously rtlong three generally parallel a 1nicrite or a calcilutite. Sparry calcite cement is northwest-trending belts that delineate the major struc­ unusual. Allochemical constituents vary widely in tures of the district. Outcrops of the northeastern belt, abundance, size, and kind. Most eom1non is shelly or­ which e:x:tends from Packard Flat southeastward across ganic detritus, intraclasts, or mixtures of the two. Other South Relief Canyon for about 21h n1iles where it is samples that 1negaseopically appear hon1ogeneous prove trunciarted by the Relief fault, are in the overturned to be either pelletal or oolitic when viewed in thin see­ limb of a major anticline overturned to the northeast. t.ion. A few scattered grains of detrital quart.z, albite, The southwestern outcrop belt parallels the northwest­ and muscovite are usually present, and some of the lime­ ern extension of Pershing Ridge-the ridge along which stone is sufficiently i1npure to weather brownish gray. the Pershing mine is located-but toward the south­ Isolated rhombs and scattered patches of secondary do­ east is offset an echelon northeastward and repeated lomite are also commonly seen in thin section, and in structurally. These Dun Glen exposures are in the over­ places significant portions of the Dun Glen limestone turned limb of a major anticline overturned to the have been altered to finely crystalline dolomite that southwest. The central belt of Dun Glen outcrops is tends to w·eather brownish gray or yellowish brown. areally the most extensive of the three. It includes the Intraclastic limestone or dolomite sedimentary brec­ exposures that form Juniper Ridge-the ridge on cia (the "limestone conglomerate" of Bailey and which the Juniper mine is located-and the discontinu­ Phoenix, 1944, p. 162-163, 167-168) is a distinctive, ous Dun Glen outcrops farther southeast on the same though usually minor, part. of the fonnation and inter­ trend. Small-scale contortions ahom1d within the Dun grades with the finer grained earbonate rocks. It is Glye of Juniper Ridge, but, as a whole, the formation thickest in the vicinity of the Juniper and Reel Bird in this central belt is upright and on or near the axis of quicksilver mines, 'vhere it forms most of the upper a major syncline on either side of which are major anti­ part of the formation and is the host rock for these clines that are overturned away fr01n it. mercury deposits. Owing to structural complications, To use the Dun Glen Formation as an objective litho­ most of the Dun Glen cropping out at the Reel Bird logic unit, the authors have assigned to it here only mine is that part characterized by carbonate breccia, the rthickest stratigraphically uninterrupted and later­ and its thickness is duplicated by faulting. The dolo­ ally persistent predominantly carbonate unit along each mitic parts of the carbonate breccia have an irregular of its outcrop belts; stratigraphically higher and lower distribution and are evidently the result of local sec­ oarbonate beds locally included 'vithin the adjacent ondary alteration of lin1estone breccia. Charaeter­ pelitic and sandy strata are excluded from it. Defined in istically, the breccias consist of sand- to pebble-size this way, the thickness and cmnposition of the Dun Glen angtdar fragments that are rudely stratified by maxi­ varies markedly from one outcrop belt to another and mum grain size and are so closely packed as to be nearly even to some extent along the same belt. These varia­ devoid of matrix (fig. l5A). In thin section, the intra­ tions have no apparent geographic trend and evidently clast boundaries appear as pigmented irregular stylo­ result mainly from rapid intertonguing of the. car­ litelike seams along which oeeur occasional sand-size bonate rocks assigned to ~the Dun Glen and the enclosing grains of quartz. This peculiar texture suggests that the partly calcareous terrigm10us clastic rocks. clasts of calcareous mud were sufficiently cohesive to be transported and mixed together as angular fragments LITHOLOGIC DESCRIPTION by currents strong enough to 'vinno'-v out any finer Medium- to dark-gray massive limestone in well-de­ grained detritus and yet too plastic to maintain a fined medimn to very thick beds characterizes the Dun porous rigid framework ,vithin 'vhich sparry caleite Glen Formation, but dolomite, intraclastic limestone or eoulcl be deposited. Inh~aclasts include: a variety of or­ dolomite breccia, sandy limestone, and calcareous sand- ganic-detrital, pelletal, and oolitie dark-gray limestone; 42 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOW!E'R ME1SOZOIC ROCKJS, HUMBOLDT RANGE, NEVADA impure argillaceous limestone that weathers pale shallow marine depositional conditions. Fortunately, a orange gray or brownish gray; some coarse shelly detri­ few diagnostic middle Norian ammonites have also tus; and a few clasts of calcareous siltstone and sand­ been found that provide a firm basis for dating these stone. Gray- and !brown-weathering interclasts are about rocks in the Humboldt Range and, by lithologic corre­ equally abundant and give the breccia a distinctive mot­ lation, for assig11ing an age to the equivalent part of the tled appearance. Some laminated brown- and gray­ section in nearby ranges. weathering sandy limestone is interbedded with the The most fossiliferous locality, originally discovered breccia, and some brecica, particularly that locally pres­ by Prof. S. W. Muller of Stanford University, is rubout ent at the base of the, formation, consists of poorly sorted half a mile south of the Juniper Mine (USGS Mesozoic limestone intraclasts sparsely scattered in impure gaudy loc. M96) and along strike, in the calcareous, argillace­ limestone. ous, and sandy strata just below the Dun Glen Forma­ In general, the Dun Glen sections in the Pershing tion and above a thick lense or tongue of mnssive district that are composed mainly of dense gray bedded organic-detrital limestone in the Grass Valley Forma­ lim•sstone are the thinnest. The northeastern outcrop tion. Included in the large and varied assemblage from belt, which crosses South Relief Canyon, is entirely this locality are the a1nmonites I ndofuvavites cf. I. an­ bedded gray limestone and only a!bout 50 feet thick, gulatus (Diener) and Arcestes; the nautiloids Olydo­ though it is paralleled in part by an equal thickness of nautilus cf. 0. noricus Mojsisovics and Paranautilus: similar limestone in the upper part of the stratigraph­ "Alectryonia," Li1na, Oassianella, Minetrigonia~, Sep·· ically underlying Grass Vn.lley Formation. The Dun tocardia ~ nuculid, mytilid, megalodontid, and other pel­ Glen outcrop belt that parallels Pershing Ridge is ecypods; Pl~ctoconcha aequiplicata ( Gahb), S pondy­ mainly bedded gray limestone also, and its thickness lospira?, and other brachiopods; indeterminate molds varies from about 150 feet to several tens of feet-ap­ of large gastropods; echinoid and crinoid debris; colon­ parently it thins northwestward by interfingering with ial corals of several kinds; H eptastylis and other spongi­ calcareous sandstone. At the southeast end of the out­ omorphs; and Solenopora-like algae. Except for the crop belt that follows the trend of Juniper Ridge, near cephalopods, for which this particular locality is unique, the Hollywood mine, the formation is 100-150 feet thick this same assemblage, commonly with the addition of and consists of bedded gray li1nestone with some discon­ the pelecypods Pinna and "Trichites" and blocks of au­ tinuous interbeds of calcareous sandstone. Northwest­ ricarian wood, occurs either in or just below the Dun \Vard along this outcrop belt the thickness of strata Glen Formation at a number of other places in the included in the Dun Glen increases to at least a few hun­ Pershing district and in the northern Stillwater Range dred feet near the Juniper mine, mainly by the addition and Tobin Range. Plectoconcha aeqttiplicata ( Gabb) of sedimentary breecias to the upper part of the forma­ was originally described from the northern Stillwater tion. Though these br:sccias intergrade with the lime­ Range, presumably from these beds to which it is stone and are inseparable from them as a map unit, they restricted and in which it is common. might originally have been an interbedded succession Two other occurrences of ammonites in the Pershing of limestone and fine-grained terrigenous clastic rocks district are in the partly calcareous upper Grass Valley like that which immediately overlies nearby sections of Formation that forms the core of the faulted overturned Dun Glen limestone. By differential reaction to strong anticline between Pershing and Juniper Ridges. Flat­ \Vave action or other currents, the limestone may have tened impressions questionably identified as Indojttva- been concentrated as a coarse clastic deposit and the 1Jites cf. I. angu,zatull occur at USGS Mesozoic locality originally interbedded fine-grained terrigenous sedi­ M1188 in impure limestone a few hundred feet below ment been swept a way. Thus, the anomalous thick­ the Dun Glen Formation in the overturned limb of the ness of the Dun Glen section here might have resulted anticline and at a stratigraphic level comparable to that from the local formation of limestone breccia in place of locality M96, where this species occurs in the up- or nearly so. FOSSILS AND AGE

FIGURE 15.-0arbonate breccia and conglomerate from Upper The limestones of the Dun Glen Formation and the Triassic rocks of the Pershing district in the southern Hum­ calcareous beds in the immediately underlying strata boldt Range. Photographs only slightly reduced from natural locally contain an abundance of marine fossils. Few of size. A., Sawn surface of limestone sedimentary breccia from these fossils are of much valuz for precise age determina­ the upper part of the Dun Glen Form:ation on Juniper Ridge tion, but many of them, such as hermatypic corals, coral­ about a quarter of a mile northeast of the Juniper mine. ·B, 'Vea:thered surface of dolomite conglomerate from the lower line algae, and thick -shelled oysterlike pelecypods, are part of the lower unit of post-Dun Glen strata on Pershing of considerably importance as indicators of extremely Ridge near the Pershing mine. DUN GI.IE

Compton, R. R., 1960 Contact metamorphism in Santa Rosa Merriam, J. C., 1908, Triassic Ichthyosauria, with special refer­ Range, Nevada: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 71, no. 9, p. ence to American forms : California Univ. Mem. 1, 196 p. 1383-1416. }!osher, L. C., and Clark, D. L., 196:J, Middle Tl'liassic conodonts Davidson, Pirie, 1919, A cestraciont spine from the middle from the Prida Formation of north\vestern Nevada: Jour. Triassic of Nevada: California Univ., Dept. Geology Bull., Paleontology, v. 39, no. 4, p. 551-565. v. 11, no. 4, pp. 433-435. ~Iuller, S. ,V., Ferguson, H. G., and Roberts, R. J. 19G1, Geology Dzulymki, Stanislaw, and Sanders, J. E., 1962, Current marks of the Mount Tobin quadrangle, Nevada: U.S. Geol. Survey on firm mud bottoms : Connecticut Acad. Arts and Sci. Geol. Quad. Map GQ-7. Trans., v. 42, p. 57-96, 22 pls. Xewell, N. D., Rigby, J. K., Fischer, A. G., 'Vhiteman, A. J., Ferguson, H. G., Muller, S.,V., and Roberts, R. J., 1951, Geology Hickox, J. E., and Bradley, .J. S., 1953, The Permian reef of the 'Vinnemucca quadrangle, Nevada: U.S. Geol. Survey complex of the Guadalupe Mountains region, Texas and Geol. Quad. 1\Iap GQ-11. New Mexico; a study in paleoecology: San Francisco, Calif., Folk, R. L., 19·59, Practical petrographic classification of lime~ ,V. H. Freeman and Co., 236 p. stones: Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists Bull., v. 43, no 1, Ransome, Ji~. h. 1909, Notes on some mining districts in Hum­ p.1-38. boldt County, Nevada: U.S. Geol. Survey Bull. 414, 75 p. ---1962, Spectral subdivision of limestone types, in Ham, SHberling, N ..J., 1961, Upper Triassic marine mollusks from ,V. E., ed., Classification of carbonate rocks-a symposium: the Natchez Pass formation in northwestern Nevada: Jour. Am. Asf'oc. Petroleum Geologists Mem. 1, p. 62-84. Paleontology, v. 35, no. 3, 535-542, pl. 74. Gabb, ,V. 1\I., 1864, Description of the Triassic fossils of Cali­ ---1962, Stratigraphic distribution of Middle Traissic am­ fornia and the adjacent terl'iitories: California Geol. Survt>y, monites at Fossil Hill, Humboldt Range, Nevada: Jour. Paleontology, v. 1, p. 17-35, pls. 3, 4. Paleo::tology, v. 36, no. 1, p. 153-160. Givens, C. R., and Susuki, Takeo, 1963, Late Triassic fauna from Silberling, N. J., and Roberts, R. J., 1962, Pre-Tertiary stratig­ interlava sediments of east-central Vancouver Is1land [abs.] : raphy and structure of northwestern Nevada: Geol. Soc. Geol. Soc. America, Cordilleran Sec.-Seismol. Soc. America­ Ameriea Spec. Paper 72, 58 p. Paleont. Soc., Pacific Coast Sec., 59th Ann. 1\Itg., Berkeley, Silberling, N. J., and Tozer, E. T., 1968, Biostratigraphic clas­ Calif., 1963, Program, p. 35. sification of the marine Triassic in North America: Geol. Goddard, E. N., clun., and others, 1948, Rock-color chart: Wash­ Soc. America Spec. Paper 110, 63 p. ington, Na:tl. Research Oouncil (repub. by Geol. Soc. Amer­ Silberling, N. J., and 'Vallace, R. E., 1967, Geology of the Imlay ica, 1963), 6 p. quadrangle, Pershing County. Nevada: U.S. Geol. Survey Hague, Arnold, and Emmons, S. F., 1877, Descriptive geology : Geo·l. Quad. Map GQ-666. U.S. Geol. Exr)lor. 40th Parallel (King), v. 2, 890 p. Smith, J. P., 19,14, The Middle Triassic marine invertebrate Hyatt, Alpheus, and Smith, J.P., 1905, The Triassic faunas of North America: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper genera of America: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 40, 394 83, 254 p., 99 pls. p., 85 pls. Spath, L. F., 1934, The Ammonoidea of the Trias., Pt. 4 of Ingram, R. L., 1954, Terminolo·gy for the thickness of stratifi­ Catalogue of the fotssil Cephalopoda in the British Museum cation and parting unit-s in sedimentary rocks: Geol. Soc. (Natural History) : London, Adlard and S'()n, Ltd., 521 p. America Bull., v. 6.5, no. 9 p. 937-938. Tozer, E. T., 1965~a, Upper Tl-iassic ammonoid zones of the Keith, 1\I. L., and Weber, J. N., 1964, Carbon and oxygen isotopic Peace River Foothills, British Columbia, and their bearing composition of selected limestones and fossils : Geochim. et on the ela~tsification of the Norian Stage: Oanadian Jour. Oosmochim. Acta, v. 28, no. 11, p.1787-1816. Earth Sci., v. 2, no. 3, p. 216-226. King, Clarence, 1878, Systematic geology: U.S. Geol. Explor. ---1965h, Lower Triassic stages and ammoQloid zones of 40th Parallel (King) , v. 1, 803 p. Arctic Canada: Canada Geol. Survey Paper 6·5-12, 14 p. :ruing, P. B., ·19-12, Permian of west Texas and southeastern ---1967, Standard for Triassic time: Canada Geol. Survey New Mexico, Pt. 2 of DeFord, R. K., and Lloyd, E. R., ed., Bull. 156, 103 p., 10 pls. West Texas-New Mexico symposium: Am. Assoe. Petro­ Wallace, R. E., Silberling, N. J., Irwin, W. P., and Tatlock, D. B., lemn Geologists Bull., v. 26, no. 4, p. 535-763. 1959, Preliminary geologic map of the Buffalo Mountain ---1948, Geology of the southe1~1 Guadalupe Mountains, quadrangle, Nevada: U.S. Geol. Survey Mineral Inv. Field Texas: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 215, 183 p. Studies Map ~iF-220. ---1962, Leonard and Wolfcamp Series of Sierra Diablo 'Vallace, R. l

[Italic page numbers indicate major references]

A Page Fossils-Continued Page Fossils-Continued Page Pinna______42 Abstract------1 Clydonautilus noricus______42 Acknowledgments••. ______6 corals ______------______22,47 Placites ______------___ ------___ ----- 46,47 Placunopsis. ______25 Age, Dun Glen Formation------42 Cuccoceras bonaevistae______19 Grass Valley Formation ______34 Czekanowskites hayesi.______19 Plectoconcha aequiplicata. __ -______--- __ _ 42 Natchez Pass Formation ______24 Daonella ______13, 18,19 Posidonia ______-- ______----___ 18 20 post-Dun Glen strata______46 Prida Formation .. ------9,15 lommeli. ______------_____ taramellii ______• __ _ 20 Prida Formation ______14,15 American basin fault------23 Anisian, ammonite faunas. ______17, 18 Distichites. __ ------______46 Proarcestes ______------___ 19,20 Fossil Hill area______19 mesacanthus ______46 Prohungarites ______------______----- 15 Antelope Springs mine.______45 Dittmariteslilli. ------46 Protrachyceras subasperum .. ______- ___ 19,20 Arizona basement high ______10,26 Drepanites rutherfordi.______44 Pseudodanubites halli. ______-- :. _ 19 Arizona mine area, Prida Formation______12 Dun Glen Formation______42 Pseudosirenites pardonetL ______--- _-- 46 silver deposits______26 Eophyllites. ______18 Pseudotropit•s ultratriassicus ______-_- _ 4 7 Augusta Mountains______39 Episculites terres __ ___ ------______46 Pterotoceras caurinum .•• ______-__ _ 44 Franziceras. ______47 Ptychites______19 B Frechites______19 radiolari

Page Page Page Lithology, Dun Glen Formation------41 Pershing district.. .. ______• 31, 33, 40, 46 Star Peak_------8, 23 Grass Valley Formation______31 post-Dun Glen lower Mesozoic strata_____ 44 Star Peak Group, description______8 Natchez Pass Formation______!1 Pershing mine.. ______41, 45 facies relation______tB Pershing Ridge ______41, 45 Prida Formation______10 lateral variation. ------t5 Lone Mountain Dolomite______29 Petrified wood ______------______39,42 original description. ______._ •• ___ 7 Lower member, Natchez Pass Formation_____ 21 Post-Dun Glen strata, lower unit______44 paleogeographic interpretation .. _._._.____ t5 Prida Formation______10 upper unit. ______-- ______-- __ ----- 48 Star-Humboldt basement high. __ ------10,26 Prida Formation, description______8 Stillwater Range _____ ------25, 28, 29, 30,39 M fossils and age______15 Mapping______6 lithologic description. __ ------10 T lower member______10 Mercury deposits------41,45 Tehama reverse fault •• ______23 Middle member, Prida Formation______13 middle member ______------13 upper member______13 Tobin Formation------15 Mill City hills _____ ------20, 21, 24,30 Tobin Range ______------_____ 25, 28, 29, 30, 36,39 Prida-Natchez Pass facies.______29 Muller, S. W., acknowledgments______6 Tozer, E. T.,acknowledgments______6 Prohungarites beds ______---- ______------15 N,O u Quicksilver deposits------·------41,45 Natchez Pass Formation, depositional en- Unconform'ty, Prida-Koipato______9 vironment______28 R Unionville quadrangle______6 Raspberry Formation______44 description.------eo Red Bird mine ______41,45 Upper member, Natchez Pass Formation••..• 21,23 fossils and age_------!4 Relief fault ______33, 41, 44 Prida Formation.--- __ •• ______13 lithologic description ____ • ______.______!1 Relief mine ..• _---______26 members ______---- ____ .______21 Roberts Mountains Form,ation______29 v upper member, regional relations______SO Rochester Rhyolite ______---- __ ------____ ---· 9, 28 Victorio Peak Limestone______29 volcanic and carbonate rocks______!9 Volcanic and carbonate rocks, Natchez Pass Neopopanoceras haugi Zone. __ ------15 s Formation, relationship______B9 Santa Clara fault.______23 Osobb Formatl<>n- ______•. ______39 Volcanic rocks, Natchez Pass Formation_ -. __ 21 Santa Clara Peak______20 Prida Formation, lower member______11 Santa Rosa Range ______36,40,46 upper member•• ------·------15 P,Q Sedimentary structures, Grass Valley Forma- tion •. ------___ 33, 34, 36, 39,40 w Paleogeographic interpretation, Grass Valley post-Dun Glen strata______45 Weaver Rhyolite______9 Formation______38 Prida Formation. ------14 West Humboldt Range ______31,36 Star Peak Group ------~------!5 Shebamine------26 Wheeler mine. ______• ______•• ______._ 26 Pardonet Formation______44 Silver deposits ______------26 Winnemucca Formation ______44,46 Peace River Foothills, British Columbia_____ 44 Standard thrust·------20 Winnemucca sequence ______S,36

U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1969 0 - 310-683