α-Cell Glucokinase Suppresses Glucose-Regulated Glucagon Secretion
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ulster University's Research Portal ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03034-0 OPEN α-cell glucokinase suppresses glucose-regulated glucagon secretion Davide Basco1, Quan Zhang 2, Albert Salehi 3, Andrei Tarasov2, Wanda Dolci1, Pedro Herrera 4, Ioannis Spiliotis2, Xavier Berney1, David Tarussio1, Patrik Rorsman2 & Bernard Thorens1 Glucagon secretion by pancreatic α-cells is triggered by hypoglycemia and suppressed by high glucose levels; impaired suppression of glucagon secretion is a hallmark of both type 1 1234567890():,; and type 2 diabetes. Here, we show that α-cell glucokinase (Gck) plays a role in the control of glucagon secretion. Using mice with α-cell-specific inactivation of Gck (αGckKO mice), we find that glucokinase is required for the glucose-dependent increase in intracellular ATP/ADP ratio and the closure of KATP channels in α-cells and the suppression of glucagon secretion at euglycemic and hyperglycemic levels. αGckKO mice display hyperglucagonemia in the fed state, which is associated with increased hepatic gluconeogenic gene expression and hepatic glucose output capacity. In adult mice, fed hyperglucagonemia is further increased and glucose intolerance develops. Thus, glucokinase governs an α-cell metabolic pathway that suppresses secretion at or above normoglycemic levels; abnormal suppression of glucagon secretion deregulates hepatic glucose metabolism and, over time, induces a pre-diabetic phenotype. 1 Center for Integrative Genomics, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. 2 Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LE, UK. 3 Department of Clinical Science, UMAS, Division of Islet Cell Physiology, Lund, Sweden. 4 Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, 1200 Geneva, Switzerland. Davide Basco and Quan Zhang contributed equally to this work. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to B.T. (email: [email protected]) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2018) 9:546 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03034-0 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03034-0 lucagon secretion by pancreatic α-cells is rapidly system5,8,9. On the other hand, suppression of glucagon secretion Gincreased when the blood glucose concentration falls by hyperglycemia relies on paracrine regulation, including below the normoglycemic level to increase hepatic glucose insulin-induced inhibition and/or somatostatin-induced inhibi- production, and is suppressed by hyperglycemia1,2. The tion of α-cells10. mechanisms controlling hypoglycemia-induced glucagon secre- In pancreatic β-cells, the dose response of glucose-stimulated tion remain debated, and both intrinsic and paracrine mechan- insulin secretion is controlled by the activity of glucokinase 3,4 11 isms have been postulated (reviewed in refs. ). There is (Gck), which has relatively high KM for glucose (8 mM) . evidence that hypoglycemia triggers glucagon secretion via a fall Mutations that increase the KM for glucose of this enzyme shifts in the cytoplasmic ATP/ADP ratio, leading to moderate KATP the dose response of GSIS to the right, causing Maturity Onset channel activity and increased activity of P/Q type Ca++ chan- Diabetes of the Young 2 (MODY2)12. Glucokinase is also nels3. The resulting increase in intracellular Ca2+ leads to gluca- expressed in α-cells13, but its role in the control of glucagon gon secretory granules exocytosis. Extrinsic factors also play an secretion is not known. Studies of MODY2 patients during important role in triggering glucagon secretion, in particular, the stepped hyperinsulinemic/hypoglycemic clamps showed that signals from the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of glucagon secretion was stimulated at higher glucose concentra- the autonomic nervous system4,5, which are activated by tion than in control individuals, but whether this was due to a hypoglycemia-sensing neurons present in the extrapancreatic direct effect in the α-cells or secondary to altered glucose-sensing sites, such as the hepatoportal vein area6,7 and the central nervous by the central nervous system and altered autonomic nervous abIslets Liver Brainstem Ileum ccccKO KO KO KO Flox Del Glucagon Tdtomato Merge cdef 1.2 Ctrl 1.5 0.25 4 GckKO 0.20 3 0.8 1.0 0.15 2 0.10 (% of BW) 0.4 0.5 -cell mass (mg) -cell mass (mg) Pancreas mass 1 β Islet surface (%) α 0.05 0.0 0.0 0.00 0 g 1.5 1G 20G i Ctrl ** 1G 6G 1G+Tolb GckKO 10G 10msucc # § 3msucc 3G 1msucc 1msucc 1.0 *** 4FCCP ∞ F 0.5 0 (% of content) 0 F / Glucagon secretion F 0.1 0.0 5 min Ctrl GckKO h 3 2.0 1.8 2 Ctrl = 116) 1.6 n ( 1.4 1 1.2 (% of content) Insulin secretion 1.0 = 87) 0.8 GckKO n ( 0 0.6 Ctrl GckKO Fig. 1 Alpha-cell Gck inactivation and the suppression of glucagon secretion. a Representative immunofluorescence (out of n = 3 replicates) of the co- localization of glucagon (green) and tdtomato (red) in a pancreatic section from αGckKO-Rosa26tdtomato mice. Scale bar: 100 µm. b PCR analysis of recombination of the Gckflox allele in the indicated tissues of Ctrl and αGckKO mice. c Pancreas' weight normalized to BW. See also Supplementary Fig. 1. d Islet surface expressed as percentage of total pancreatic surface. e α-cell mass. f β-cell mass. Values in b–h were extracted from the analysis of three pancreata for each genotype. g Glucagon and h Insulin secretion from isolated islets in the presence of the indicated glucose (G) concentrations and of tolbutamide. g, h Data represent the average of three independent experiments, each performed in duplicates. ***p < 0.001 vs. Ctrl 1G; **p < 0.01 vs. αGckKO 1G + Tolb. #p < 0.01 vs. Ctrl 6 G. §p < 0.001 vs. Ctrl 20G. ∞p < 0.05 vs. Ctrl 1G + Tolb. One-way ANOVA for intra-group analysis and Student’s t- test for comparison between genotypes. i ATP/ADP ratio measurements in α-cells of Ctrl and αGckKO islets exposed to glucose and methyl-succinate (msucc). n = 116 for Ctrl and n = 86 for αGckKO α-cells. See also Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3. Data are represented as mean ± s.e.m. 2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2018) 9:546 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03034-0 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03034-0 ARTICLE activity remains unclear14. Here we explore the role of Gck in the Results pancreatic α-cell by generating α-cell-specific Gck knockout Characterization of αGckKO islets. To generate mice with mice. Our data illustrate that Gck is critical to glucose sensing in inactivation of the Gck gene in α-cells (αGckKO mice), we crossed the α-cell and underscore the significance of intrinsic (exerted Gcklox/lox mice9 with preproglucagon-Cre (Gcg-Cre) mice15. These within the α-cell itself) as opposed to paracrine/systemic mice were further crossed with Rosa26-tdtomato mice and ~70% regulation. of the glucagon-positive cells also expressed tdtomato (Fig. 1a), a Ctrl 6G 20 1G 1G 6G 10 0 0 –20 –20 (mV) (mV) m –40 –40 m V V –60 –60 –80 –80 20 s 10 ms 6G GckKO 1G 6G 10 20 1G 0 0 –20 –20 (mV) –40 m (mV) V m –40 V –60 –60 –80 10 ms –80 20 s b 1G 6G c 4 1G 6G 15 0 20 0 3 ** 3 15 –20 10 –20 2 (mV) (mV) (mV) 2 (mV) 10 –40 peak peak V 5 anti-peak –40 1 V anti-peak V 1 V * (Hz) Frequency 5 –60 Frequency (Hz) Frequency 0 –60 0 0 –80 0 1G 6G * 1G 6G 1G 6G 1G 6G d e 150 80 Ctrl 5 pA * 60 100 20 ms (pF/pS) 40 (pF/pS) GckKO KATP 50 KATP G 5 pA G 20 20 ms 0 0 1G 6G 1G6G 1G 6G f 30 mV 0 mV g 120 –70 mV –30 mV Ctrl GckKO Ctrl Cm 80 50 fF (fF) m C 500 ms Δ 40 GckKO Cm 0 50 fF –40 –200 20 40 500 ms V (mV) NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | (2018) 9:546 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03034-0 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03034-0 indicating that a large majority of α-cells express the Cre increasing glucose to 6 mM resulted in a small and reversible recombinase. The recombined Gck allele was detected in islets of membrane depolarization (+6 ± 2 mV, n = 5) and an ~10 mV αGckKO mice, but not in their liver, brainstem, and ileum tissues reduction of the action potential peak voltage in α-cells from Ctrl that also express the preproglucagon gene, but not the Cre islets. By contrast, increasing glucose neither depolarized nor recombinase in the Gcg-Cre mice utilized (Fig. 1b). Pancreas reduced the action potential peak voltage in αGckKO α-cells mass, islet surface area, α-cell mass and β-cell mass (Fig. 1c–f), as (Fig. 2a–c). In αGckKO α-cells, glucose, if anything, tended to well as pancreatic insulin and glucagon contents (Supplementary hyperpolarize the α-cell and increase action potential height. Fig. 1) were the same in Ctrl and αGckKO mice. These effects may reflect somatostatin release from the neigh- The impact of α-cell Gck gene inactivation on glucagon boring δ-cells17. α secretion was then examined by static incubations. At 1 mM In Ctrl -cells, increasing glucose reduced the resting KATP glucose, glucagon secretion by islets from 18-week-old Ctrl and conductance by 24 ± 11pA/pF; no such decrease was observed in αGckKO mice was comparable (Fig. 1g, black bars). When αGckKO α-cells (Fig. 2d, e). incubated with 6 and 20 mM glucose, glucagon release by Ctrl We ascertained (using capacitance measurements3) that islets was decreased by ~50%, but not in αGckKO islets (Fig.