Technical Volume 2: Cybersecurity Practices for Medium and Large Health Care Organizations
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Interpreting the CBCT Data Volume Part I
MilesCE_Supp_Layout 1 7/8/11 12:59 PM Page FC1 Educational Supplement 2 ADA CERP CE Credits Orthotown is pleased to offer you continuing education. You can read the following CE article, take the post-test and claim your CE credits. See instructions on page 6. This CE course is supported by an unre- Farran Media, LLC, is an ADA CERP Recognized provider. ADA CERP is a service of the American Dental Association to assist dental professionals in identifying quality providers of continuing dental education. ADA CERP does not approve or endorse stricted grant from Cybermed, Inc. This individual courses or instructors, nor does it imply acceptance of credit hours by boards of dentistry. course offers two ADA CERP CE Credits. For more information, please visit http://www.towniecentral.com/orthotown/onlineCE.aspx MilesCE_Supp_Layout 1 7/7/11 12:26 PM Page 1 Part 1: Interpreting the CBCT Data Volume in Orthodontic Cases: You Should See What You May Be Missing! by Dale A. Miles, DDS, MS, FRCD(C) This is a two-part article designed to help clinicians The Skull and Its Contents understand the more common findings they will encounter in Most commonly there are physiologic calcifications seen the anatomic regions they capture in larger field-of-view within the skull on large field-of-view CBCT machines. (FOV) CBCT machines. Many of these findings will also be These include the more common calcifications of the pineal seen in smaller FOV machines when the volume capture is gland, choroid plexuses and falx cerebri. Although calcifica- moved around to view things like the temporomandibular tion of the falx cerebri is seen in the nevoid basal cell carci- joint or third molar regions. -
Comparison of Two Software Programs in Voxel-Based Superimposition of CBCT Images
@2019 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. www.jco-online.com Comparison of Two Software Programs in Voxel-Based Superimposition of CBCT Images TAREK ELSHEBINY, BDS, MSD SHERIF ELBARNASHAWY, BDS EHAB BENNASIR, BDS, MSD MOHAMED ADEL NADIM, BDS, MSD, PhD JUAN MARTIN PALOMO, DDS, MSD hile introducing the cephalometer in 1931, Broadbent proposed a tech- nique for superimposing successive cephalometric films as a way to Wstudy the physical changes caused by facial growth over time.1 This approach eventually became a standard component of orthodontic records. Since Broadbent, various authors have developed other methods of super- imposing serial cephalograms in the horizontal and vertical dimensions.2,3 An overall superimposition is usually performed on the cranial base to eval- uate growth and treatment outcomes by indicating changes in the maxillary and mandibular arches; regional superimpositions of the maxilla or mandible show dentoalveolar changes. A third dimension has always been lacking The resolution of a CBCT image is deter- in traditional cephalometric analysis and superim- mined by the individual volume elements (voxels) position, even though its importance in orthodon- produced from the volumetric dataset.5 A voxel is tic and surgical planning has been emphasized for the three-dimensional equivalent of the pixel in decades. Several attempts have been made to vi- two-dimensional images. The size of a voxel is sualize this third dimension,3-5 but it was the ad- defined by its height, width, and depth; the voxels vent of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in CBCT scans are usually isotropic.6 The mono- and related software that enabled the assessment chromatic gray color of a voxel represents its den- of all three dimensions in clinical practice. -
Electrode Position and the Clinical Outcome After Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation
ORIGINAL ARTICLE Neuroscience http://dx.doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2011.26.10.1344 • J Korean Med Sci 2011; 26: 1344-1355 Electrode Position and the Clinical Outcome after Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus Stimulation Sun Ha Paek1,2,5,6,7, Jee-Young Lee1,3, We compared the surgical outcome with electrode positions after bilateral subthalamic Han-Joon Kim1,3, Daehee Kang4, nucleus (STN) stimulation surgery for Parkinson’s disease. Fifty-seven patients treated with Yong Hoon Lim1, Mi Ryoung Kim1, bilateral STN stimulations were included in this study. Electrode positions were determined Cheolyoung Kim8, Beom Seok Jeon1,3,5 in the fused images of preoperative MRI and postoperative CT taken at six months after 1,2 and Dong Gyu Kim surgery. The patients were divided into three groups: group I, both electrodes in the STN; group II, only one electrode in the STN; group III, neither electrode in the STN. Unified 1Movement Disorder Center and Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul; Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Hoehn and Yahr stage, and activities of daily Departments of 2Neurosurgery and 3Neurology, living scores significantly improved at 6 and 12 months after STN stimulation in both group Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul; I and II. The off-time UPDRS III speech subscore significantly improved (1.6 ± 0.7 at 4 Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National baseline vs 1.3 ± 0.8 at 6 and 12 months, P < 0.01) with least L-dopa equivalent daily University College of Medicine, Seoul; 5Neuroscience Research Institute, 6Ischemia dose (LEDD) (844.6 ± 364.1 mg/day at baseline; 279.4 ± 274.6 mg/day at 6 months; and Hypoxia Disease Institute and 7Cancer Research 276.0 ± 301.6 mg/day at 12 months, P < 0.001) at 6 and 12 months after STN deep brain Institute, Seoul National University College of stimulation (DBS) in the group I. -
Delivering Results to the Inbox Sailthru’S 2020 Playbook on Deliverability, Why It’S Imperative and How It Drives Business Results Introduction to Deliverability
Delivering Results to the Inbox Sailthru’s 2020 Playbook on Deliverability, Why It’s Imperative and How It Drives Business Results Introduction to Deliverability Every day, people receive more than 293 billion Deliverability is the unsung hero of email marketing, emails, a staggering number that only represents ultimately ensuring a company’s emails reach their the tip of the iceberg. Why? The actual number intended recipients. It’s determined by a host of of emails sent is closer to 5.9 quadrillion, with the factors, including the engagement of your subscribers overwhelming majority blocked outright or delivered and the quality of your lists. All together, these factors to the spam folder. result in your sender reputation score, which is used to determine how the ISPs treat your email stream. Something many people don’t realize is that to the Deliverability is also a background player, so far in the major Internet Service Providers (ISPs) — Gmail, shadows that many people don’t think about it, until Yahoo!, Hotmail, Comcast and AOL — “spam” there’s a major issue. doesn’t refer to marketing messages people may find annoying, but rather malicious email filled with That’s why Sailthru’s deliverability team created this scams and viruses. In order to protect their networks guide. Read on to learn more about how deliverability and their customers, the ISPs cast a wide net. If a works on the back-end and how it impacts revenue, message is deemed to be spam by the ISP’s filters, it’s your sender reputation and how to maintain a good dead on arrival, never to see the light of the inbox, as one, and best practices for list management, email protecting users’ inboxes is the top priority of any ISP. -
Spam, Spammers, and Spam Control a White Paper by Ferris Research March 2009
Spam, Spammers, and Spam Control A White Paper by Ferris Research March 2009. Report #810 Ferris Research, Inc. One San Antonio Place San Francisco, Calif. 94133, USA Phone: +1 (650) 452-6215 Fax: +1 (408) 228-8067 www.ferris.com Table of Contents Spam, Spammers, and Spam Control................................................3 Defining Spam.................................................................................3 Spammer Tactics .............................................................................3 Sending Mechanisms.................................................................4 Spammer Tricks.........................................................................4 Techniques for Identifying Spam ....................................................5 Connection Analysis..................................................................5 Behavioral Analysis...................................................................6 Content Scanning.......................................................................6 Controlling Spam: How and Where ................................................7 The Key Role of Reputation Services .......................................7 Conclusion: An Arms Race.............................................................8 Trend Micro Interview........................................................................9 Ferris Analyzer Information Service. Report #810. March 2009. © 2009 Ferris Research, Inc. All rights reserved. This document may be copied or freely reproduced provided you -
Periodontal Measurement on Digital Images Reveals Risk of Overestimation in Clinical Periodontal Probing in Periodontitis Patients
Periodontal Measurement on Digital Images Reveals Risk of Overestimation in Clinical Periodontal Probing in Periodontitis Patients Hye-Min Chung Yonsei University College of Dentistry Jin-Young Park Yonsei University College of Dentistry Kyung-A Ko Yonsei University College of Dentistry Seong-Ho Choi Yonsei University College of Dentistry Jung-Seok Lee ( [email protected] ) Yonsei University College of Dentistry Research Article Keywords: Periodontitis, gingivitis, imaging, diagnosis Posted Date: June 30th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-654031/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/11 Abstract Aim: To compare the supra-alveolar gingival dimension (GD) and the clinical pocket probing depth (PD) by combining data from an intraoral scanner (IOS) and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and identify the clinical features affecting the clinical PD. Materials and Methods: 1,071 sites from 11 patients were selected for whom CBCT, IOS images, and periodontal charts were recorded at the same visit. CBCT and IOS data were superimposed. GD was measured on cross-sectional images of the probed sites. The level of agreement and correlation between GD and PD were assessed for the entire population and also within groups (treated vs untreated, bleeding on probing [BOP] vs no BOP, and PDs of 0–3 mm vs 4–5 mm vs ≥6 mm). Results: The difference between GD and PD was 0.82±0.69 mm (mean±standard deviation), and they were positively correlated (r=0.790, p<0.001). The mean difference was smaller for sites with PD ≥4 mm than for those with a PD of 0–3 mm. -
The Effect of Amniotic Chorion Membrane on Tissue Biotype, Wound Healing and Periodontal Regeneration
IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR - JDMS) e - ISSN: 2279 - 0853, p - ISSN: 2279 - 0861.Volume 17, Issue 12 Ver. 4 (December. 2018), PP 61 - 69 www.iosrjournals.org The Effect of Amniotic Chorion Membrane on Tissue Biotype, Wound Healing and Periodontal Regeneration Maha R. Taala b 1 , Raneem M. Gamal 2 1,2 Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Oral Diagnosis and Radiology Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. Corresponding Author: Maha R. Taalab A bstract : Amniotic chorion membrane is considered to be a promising treatment modalities for furcation involvement . The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically and radiographically the effect of using Amniotic chorion membrane (ACM) in conjunction to alloplast bone graft in the management of grade II furcation involvement and to assess its effect on tissue biotype an d healing at the furcation area. This study was conducted on fourteen patients with fourteen furcation defects grade II. Patients were divided into two equal groups: Test group: were treated by alloplast bone graft and amnion chorion membrane, and control group: were treated with alloplast bone graft and collagen membrane. Soft tissue examination and hard tissue measurements with cone - beam computed tomography were performed. Test group has shown better healing, more gain in clinical attachment loss, impro ve tissue biotype and enhanced bone formation when compared to the control group. It was concluded that, ACM can promote periodontal regeneration, improve tissue biotype and enhance healing of periodontal wounds. ------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- ----- Date of Submission: 27 - 11 - 2018 Date of accep tance: 10 - 12 - 2018 -------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- --- I. Introduction Tissue biotype is a critical factor that determines the result of dental treatment. -
Tca Ballot 06 REVISED.Qxd
Ballot Anesthesiology LumaCool Whitening System & LumaWhite Plus – LumaLite, Inc. LUMIBrite Chairside Whitening – Den-Mat Holdings LLC Anesthetics – Local (Injected) Meta – Remedent Inc. Astra Zeneca Niveous – Shofu Dental Corporation COOK-WAITE – Carestream Dental Opalescence Boost – Ultradent Products, Inc. Septocaine – Septodont Perfect Bleach Office – VOCO America, Inc. Xylocaine, Polocaine, Citanest – DENTSPLY Professional Perfection White – Premier Dental Pola Office Plus – SDI (North America) Inc. Anesthetics – Technique System ProphyWhite – Life-Like Cosmetic Solutions Comfort Control – DENTSPLY Professional Rapid Rx In Office Teeth Whitening – Nu Radiance, Inc. DentalVibe Injection Comfort System – DentalVibe Rembrandt Products – Johnson & Johnson Healthcare Products Onset – Precision Buffering of Local Anesthetics – Onpharma Inc. Venus White Max – Heraeus STA System – Milestone Scientific Visible White Chairside – Colgate-Palmolive Co. X-Tip Intraosseus Anesthetic Delivery System – ZOOM! – Philips Consumer Lifestyle DENTSPLY Maillefer Cosmetic Bleaching – Take-Home system Anesthetics – Topicals AcquaBrite Nightime – Acquamed Technologies, Inc. Behzocaine Oral Anesthetic Gel – DENTSPLY Professional Dr. Collins All White Bleaching System – CaineTips – J. Morita USA, Inc. Dr. Collins Dental Products Denti-Care Denti-Freeze Topical Anesthetic Gel – Medicom Fluorescent Whitening System – Vista Dental Products EMLA – Astra Zeneca GC TiON – GC America Inc. GumNumb – Crosstex International KoR Whitening Deep Bleaching System – Hurricane -
The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Furcation Defects Diagnosis
10.1515/bjdm-2016-0023 Y T E I C O S L BALKAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE A ISSN 2335-0245 IC G LO TO STOMA The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Furcation Defects Diagnosis SUMMARY M. Cimbaljevic, J. Misic, S. Jankovic, Background: The use of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), as N. Nikolic-Jakoba an additional diagnostic tool in daily dental practice, has expanded rapidly School of Dental Medicine in recent years. Since CBCT allows assessment of dento-maxillofacial Department of Periodontology structures in three-dimensional manner, its use may be very tempting in University of Belgrade alveolar bone furcation defects (FDs) diagnosis. Belgrade, Serbia Aim: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of clinical experience and experience with CBCT on FD detection in patients with periodontitis. Material and Methods: Fifteen patients with chronic generalized severe periodontitis were included in the study. In total, 168 furcation sites were analyzed on CBCT images by a previously trained senior year undergraduate student (O1) and a PhD student with three years of CBCT experience (O2), and compared to clinical findings (probing). CBCT images were analyzed on two separate occasions, within a 7-day interval. FDs were assessed both clinically and on CBCT images, using a dichotomous scale (present/absent). Intraobserver agreement for each observer was calculated by using Kappa coefficient (k). Interobserver agreement and agreement between CBCT and clinical findings for both observers were calculated. Results: Kappa coefficient value for both observers indicated a high intraobserver agreement (k1=0.75; k2=0.94). Interobserver agreement of CBCT image analyses was present in 72.6% (73.0% in maxilla, 71.7% in mandible). -
NOV 2 3 2005 H 3
NOV 2 3 2005 h 3 510(k) Submission - Vimplant 510(k) Summary This summary of 51 0(k) safety and effectiveness information is being submitted in accordance with requirements of 21 CFR Part 807.92. Date: Aua 29. 2005 1. Company and Correspondent making the submission: Name - CyberMed, Inc. Address - #504 SJ Technoville- Gasan-dong 60-19, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, 153-710, Korea Telephone - +82-2-3397-3970 Fax - +82-2-3397-3971 Contact - Mr. Song Nak Choi/ Manager Internet - http://www.cybermed.co.kr 2. Device: Trade/proprietary name :Vimplant Common Name :Dental implant simulation software Classification Name :Picture archiving and communications system 3. Predicate Devices : Manufacturer :MATERIALISE N.V. Device :SimPlant System 510(k) Number :K033849 (Decision Date - 05/25/2004) Manufacturer: CyberMed, Inc. Device: V-workSTM 510(k) Number: K01 3878 (Decision Date - 12/07/2001) 4. Classifications Names & Citations: 21CFR 820.2050, LLZ, Picture archiving and communications system, Class2 5. Description: 1) General Description Cyber~ed, Inc. 01)011(12 510O(k) Submission - Vimplant Vlmplant TM is a dental implant simulation software for dentists and implantologists. By use of VlmplantTm, dental practicians can plan and practice their surgery in advance so they can reduce some risks which can happen during their real surgery. Vlmplan tTM provides very useful and needful functions. it contains functions of implant simulation, manipulation with 2D and 3D mode, nerve identification, and evaluation of bone density. By using Vimplant TM, dental practicians can quickly and easily simulate implant surgery on their desktop PCs. This enables them to conduct implant surgery more effectively by isolating the exact implant position site and angle and to assist in deciding the proper implant diameter, length, etc. -
Email Authentication Faqs V3
Email Authentication GUIDE Frequently Asked QUES T ION S T OGETHER STRONGER EMAIL AUTHENTICATION Marketers that use email for communication and transactional purposes should adopt and use identification and authentication protocols.” This document will explain what authentication is – includ- ing some recommendations on what you should do as an email marketer to implement these guidelines within your organization. * This Guide should not be considered as legal advice. It is being provided for informational purposes only. Please review your email program with your legal counsel to ensure that your program is meeting appropriate legal requirements. THIS COMPLIANCE GUIDE COVERS: Basics of Email Authentication Technologies Basic FAQs on the DMA’s Email Authentication Guidelines Implementation: Complementary Types of Email Authentication Systems Beyond Authentication: Email Reputation Email Authentication Resources for Marketers 1. What Do the DMA’s Email Authentication Guidelines Require? The DMA’s guidelines require marketers to choose and implement authentication technolo- gies in their email systems. It is up to your company to decide what kind of authentication protocol to use, though all are recommended based on current-day trends. The DMA does not require nor endorse the use of any specific protocol, as there are several interoperable, inexpensive, and easy to implement solutions available today. 2. Why does the DMA Require Members to Authenticate Their Email Systems? The DMA requires its members to authenticate their email systems primarily because mailbox providers (aka ISPs, MSPs or receivers) are increasingly requiring authentication. This strongly aligns with a growing trend in the email deliverability industry that’s leaning more towards domain-based reputation (as opposed to IP-based reputation a couple of years ago). -
WHITE PAPER Email Deliverability Review
WHITE PAPER Email DELIVeraBility REView dmawe are the White Paper Email Deliverability Review Published by Deliverability Hub of the Email Marketing Council Sponsored by 1 COPYRIGHT: THE DIRECT MARKETING ASSOCIATION (UK) LTD 2012 WHITE PAPER Email DELIVeraBility REView Contents About this document ...............................................................................................................................3 About the authors ...................................................................................................................................4 Sponsor’s perspective .............................................................................................................................5 Executive summary .................................................................................................................................6 1. Major factors that impact on deliverability ..............................................................................................7 1.1 Sender reputation .............................................................................................................................7 1.2 Spam filtering ...................................................................................................................................7 1.3 Blacklist operators ............................................................................................................................8 1.4 Smart Inboxes ..................................................................................................................................9