COVID-19 in Bulgaria and the World 1/1 5/2/2020 Duplicate of Коронавирус В България Numbers of Infected, Recovered and Deaths from COVID-19 by Data in Bulgaria 1600

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

COVID-19 in Bulgaria and the World 1/1 5/2/2020 Duplicate of Коронавирус В България Numbers of Infected, Recovered and Deaths from COVID-19 by Data in Bulgaria 1600 5/2/2020 Page 4 COVID-19 in Bulgaria and the world 1/1 5/2/2020 Duplicate of Коронавирус в България Numbers of infected, recovered and deaths from COVID-19 by data in Bulgaria 1600 1588 1400 Cases 1200 1232 1000 Active cases 800 600 287 400 Recovered 200 0 69 08 март 15 март 22 март 29 март 05 апр 12 апр 19 апр 26 апр Deaths Cases Recovered Deaths The aim of this report is to inform bulgarian citizens of the COVID-19 and the current situation in the country. The total positive cases are 1588, active cases are 1232, with 287 recovered and 69 deaths. First cases of infected were on 4th of March, which made Bulgaria one of the last countries in Europe to have spread the pandemic. Interestingly, neither of the two first cases had traveled to areas with known coronavirus cases. 1/1 5/2/2020 Duplicate of Коронавирус в света COVID-19 Globally 2 051 800 Active cases 1 053 327 Recovered 238 650 Deaths Cases Country/Region 1 103 461 United States 213 435 Spain 207 428 Italy 178 685 United Kingdom 167 305 France Earthstar Geographics SIO, © 2020 HERE, © 2020 Microsoft Corporation 164 077 Germany 122 392 Turkey As we can see the numbers are rising rapidly for some countries, while 114 431 Russia others like China managed to deal with the crisis and the everyday life of its 95 646 Iran citizens is bringing back to normal. The number 1 country with cases now is 92 202 Brazil USA, followed by many European countries. 83 959 China Bulgaria is on the 77th place for cases and on 66th place for active cases. 3 34536 737473 C d 1/1 5/2/2020 Page 6 Cases City Cases of COVID-19 in Bulgaria by cities 741 Sofia The statistics shows that the capital of Bulgaria, Sofia, has the largest amount 154 Pleven 122 Vidin of infected, followed by Pleven and Vidin, where the numbers are high due to 72 Plovdiv the mass infection in factory and in a hospital. 65 Kustendil 54 Sliven 46 Blagoevgrad 45 Burgas 34 Stara Zagora 32 Smolqn 27 Varna 26 Pazardjik 23 Veliko Turnovo 19 Pernik 18 Montana,Bulgaria 16 Ruse 15 Haskovo 14 Qmbol 13 Dobrich 13 Kurdzhali 9 Vraca 6 Gabrovo 5 Silistra 4 Lovec 4 Shumen 2 Bansko 1588 Earthstar Geographics SIO, © 2020 HERE, © 2020 Microsoft Corporation 1/1 5/2/2020 Page 2 Quarantined by city Sofia 15,6K Plovdiv 9,0K The most quarantined people 114 307 Varna 7,3K Quarantined overall Blagoevgrad 6,6K are in the top biggest cities in Burgas 5,4K Pazardjik 4,7K Bulgaria. The number of Haskovo 4,3K active quarantined is less Pleven 3,8K Ruse 3,6K then a quarter of the overall Sliven 3,5K 21 539 Stara Zagora 3,5K quarantined, which might be Active quarantined Veliko Turnovo 2,9K as a result of the 14-day Sofia area 2,8K Kurdzhali 2,3K period. Kustendil 2,3K Shumen 2,1K The total tested people are Vidin 2,1K Dobrich 2,0K almost 48 thousands, which 47 636 Vraca 2,0K Tested Lovec 1,9K is 6 tests per thousand Montana 1,9K citizens. Qmbol 1,8K Razgrad 1,8K Silistra 1,8K Turgovishte 1,6K 6.694 Gabrovo 1,4K Pernik 1,4K Total tests per thousand Smolqn 1,1K 1/1 5/2/2020 Page 1 2 Month forecast cases of COVID-19 Forecasting the number of cases of COVID-19 for 2 months ahead, according to the data due to the moment. The lower bound predicted is under 3 K, forecast value is 3,3 K and upper bound is 3,6 K. 3500 3000 2500 2000 1588 1500 1437 1290 1081 1000 884 966 669 522 783 500 346 611 185 449 4 23 51 107 263 0 апр 2020 май 2020 юни 2020 юли 2020 1/1 5/2/2020 Duplicate of Page 2 Patients in hospitals 317 Hospitalized in intensive care Hospitalized Hospitalized 43 (13,56%) 20% Cases hospitalized 43 274 (86,44%) Intensive care The statistics shows that 20% of all cases are hospitalized. From them almost 14% are with intensive care. 174 Unfortunately, many of the cases are medical staff, 174, Medical staff forming 10%. 1/1 5/2/2020 Page 3 New cases and deaths by date in Bulgaria 100 80 60 40 20 0 08 март 15 март 22 март 29 март 05 апр 12 апр 19 апр 26 апр New deaths New cases The maximum registered per day are 91 after mass testing in several areas and a holiday celebration when a lot of people traveled and spread the virus. The maximum deaths per day is 6 people and it was registered on the last day of April. The average cases per day are 28 and average deaths per day are 1. 1/1 5/2/2020 Page 5 Bulgaria recorded 31,643 newly registered unemployed for the period between 13 March to 1 April. From these, 17,793 claimants stated that job losses were a direct consequence of the pandemic, and 12,661 registered in the week 23–27 March alone, compared to 4,561 for the same period in 2019. The number of unemployed continued to rise throughout April. According to a statistic released by the Agency of Employment, as of 28 April 2020, there were 291,426 registered unemployed, a rise of 90,405 since the introduction of the national emergency. 1/1 5/2/2020 Page 7 The project was done by Svetlana Chepilska with Power BI then exported to PDF for flattening the curve challenge: COVID-19 DATA CHALLENGE. Used sources: (1) Ministry of Health , Bulgraia https://www.mh.government.bg/bg (2) COVID-19 Data Repository by the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University , https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19 (3) 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Bulgaria , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_coronavirus_pandemic_in_Bulgaria (4) Official source of information for COVID-19 in Bulgaria , https://coronavirus.bg/bg (5) https://sofiaglobe.com/2020/04/22/covid-19-cases-in-bulgaria-pass-1000-mark-47-dead/ (6) https://www.eui.eu/ServicesAndAdmin/CommunicationsService/News/2020/Together-against-COVID-19 1/1.
Recommended publications
  • District Heating in Bulgaria
    STATE ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION - BULGARIA DistrictDistrict heatingheating inin BulgariaBulgaria TOMA GIORTCHEV commissioner May 18-24, 2002 Newark, New Jersey – Washington, DC, U.S.A. STATE ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION - BULGARIA DistrictDistrict heatingheating inin BulgariaBulgaria ¾ 21 District heating companies ¾ 9 companies with combined heat and power production ¾ More than 40 years experience ¾ 570 000 dwellings ¾ 1.650 mill. People – 20% of population ¾ Public buildings with a heating volume equal to 240 000 normal dwellings May 18-24, 2002 Newark, New Jersey – Washington, DC, U.S.A. STATE ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION - BULGARIA DistrictDistrict heatingheating companiescompanies inin BulgariaBulgaria ROMANIA RUSE Pleven A I Shumen Varna Veliko Tarnovo SERB Sofia Sliven Pernik Burgas BLACK SEA Stara Zagora Pazardjik Plovdiv Blagoevgrad Legend TURKEY RS DHC @A INDUSTRIAL PP @A Nuclear PP - @A THERMAL PP GREECE STATE ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION - BULGARIA HeatHeat andand powerpower productionproduction fromfrom CHPCHP ¾ 1900 GWh/year power production ¾ 12 000 GWh/year heat production ¾ 1,4 billion m3 natural gas ¾ 1 million tones of coals ¾ 160 000 tones of heavy fuel oil ¾ 18 % transmission losses May 18-24, 2002 Newark, New Jersey – Washington, DC, U.S.A. STATE ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION - BULGARIA CompaniesCompanies withwith combinedcombined heatheat andand powerpower productionproduction 25 21 20 15 11 10 9 5 0 DHC-total DHC-with Industrial May 18-24, 2002 CHP PP Newark, New Jersey – Washington, DC, U.S.A. STATE ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION - BULGARIA SharesShares ofof CHPCHP companiescompanies inin powerpower productionproduction ((installedinstalled capacitiescapacities)) 5% 8% DHC with CHP 29% Industrial PP 36% Thermal PP 22% HPS over 5 MW Nuclear Power plant May 18-24, 2002 Newark, New Jersey – Washington, DC, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Bulgaria
    Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Bulgaria By Henry L. deZeng IV General Map Edition: November 2014 Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Copyright © by Henry L. deZeng IV (Work in Progress). (1st Draft 2014) Blanket permission is granted by the author to researchers to extract information from this publication for their personal use in accordance with the generally accepted definition of fair use laws. Otherwise, the following applies: All rights reserved. No part of this publication, an original work by the authors, may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise), without the prior written permission of the author. Any person who does any unauthorized act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. This information is provided on an "as is" basis without condition apart from making an acknowledgement of authorship. Luftwaffe Airfields 1935-45 Airfields Bulgaria Introduction Conventions 1. For the purpose of this reference work, “Bulgaria” generally means the territory belonging to the country on 6 April 1941, the date of the German invasion and occupation of Yugoslavia and Greece. The territory occupied and acquired by Bulgaria after that date is not included. 2. All spellings are as they appear in wartime German documents with the addition of alternate spellings where known. Place names in the Cyrillic alphabet as used in the Bulgarian language have been transliterated into the English equivalent as they appear on Google Earth. 3. It is strongly recommended that researchers use the search function because each airfield and place name has alternate spellings, sometimes 3 or 4.
    [Show full text]
  • BULGARIA 2014–2015 Field Work
    ASSESSMENT REPORT: Health Situation at EU’s Southern Borders - Migrant, Occupational, and Public Health BULGARIA 2014–2015 field work The information and views set out in this report are those of the author, and as such do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the EC or the IOM. Neither they nor any person acting on their behalf may be therefore held responsible for any use of the information contained therein. Reproduction is authorized provided the source is acknowledged. 1 This document is based on the International Organization for Migration (IOM) assessment conducted within the framework of the “Fostering health provision for migrants, the Roma, and other vulnerable groups” (Equi-Health) project. The Equi-Health project is co-financed under the EU 2012 work plan, within the second programme of Community action in the field of health (2008- 2013), by a direct grant awarded to IOM by the European Commission’s Directorate General for Health and Food Safety (SANTE), through the Consumers, Health, Agriculture, and Food Executive Agency (CHAFEA). The Equi-Health project is designed and managed by the International Organization for Migration (IOM) Regional Office Brussels, Migration Health Division (MHD). The methodology of the field work and analysis, based on the prior to PHBLM (Increasing Public Health Safety alongside the New Eastern European Border Line project) European Commission co-funded IOM project experience, was developed by IOM with additional support from the Andalusian School of Public Health (EASP). The Assessment Report was drafted under the IOM MHD Brussels Regional Office guidance by Milen Petrov from IOM MHD Sofia, and edited and revised by Mariya Samuilova.
    [Show full text]
  • Triangle Razgrad - Shumen - Targovishte - Balanced Structure Between Urban Centers Rousse and Varna
    rd Editors: Recep Efe, Ibrahim Atalay, Isa Cürebal 3 International Geography Symposium - GEOMED 2013 Triangle Razgrad - Shumen - Targovishte - Balanced Structure Between Urban Centers Rousse and Varna MARIA V. SHISHMANOVA South West University “Neofit Rilski”, Blagoevgrad - Bulgaria [email protected] Abstract Regional centers Razgrad, Targoviste, Shumen form a local "triangle" of the urban development axis between Varna and Ruse. It is necessary to have in view that the transport direction Targoviste-Shumen-Varna connecting the Danube development axis (Eurocorridor № 7) with the Black Sea one is represented as a main axis of urban development with future potentials. Moreover, the "triangle" lies on duplicate urbanization axis international transport corridor № 9. The municipality of Shumen could receive and would take advantage of economic impacts of Varna as this town is one of the three international/national important centers in the country. The location of the "triangle" Razgrad-Shumen-Targoviste gives a chance for synergy and in better coordination of the socio-economic development can overcome their current not-so- good condition. They could develop complementary activities and create a strong cluster of production, innovations and attract foreign investments; they could create even compatible high- tech industrial sector using specific local resources. Thus the three municipalities will have possibilities to overcome the high unemployment in these areas and to be promoted as a counterweight to the two strong centers of growth Ruse and Varna. Keywords: Regional centers, socio-economic development, center – periphery, types of municipalities, local models of development Introduction Research on socio-economic and regional development in Bulgaria is an important task for the country because as an equal member of the European Union it must meet all the requirements and signed documents in this field.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • 4-2 Explanation of Draft Report
    4-2 Explanation of Draft Report Appendices - 21 Appendices - 22 Appendices - 23 Appendices - 24 Appendices - 25 Appendices - 26 Appendices - 27 5. Other Relevant Data 5-1 Social Condition related to the Project (1) Number of tourists and tourism revenue In 2004, approximately 4.63 million tourists visited Bulgaria from abroad. The number of tourists has been increasing with the growth of 14% from 2003 to 2004. Number of tourists to Bulgaria 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Number of Tourists to Bulgaria 2,785,079 3,185,684 3,433,276 4,047,863 4,629,854 Growth (since a year before) 14.38% 7.77% 17.90% 14.38% For Tourism and Recreation 2,354,052 2,755,717 2,992,590 3,531,567 4,010,326 Growth (since a year before) 17.06% 8.60% 18.01% 13.56% Other purposes 431,027 429,967 440,686 516,296 619,528 Growth (since a year before) -0.25% 2.49% 17.16% 19.99% (Source: Department "National Policy of Tourism" , Ministry of Culture) The largest number of tourists going to Bulgaria is from Greece, totaling 707 thousand in 2004; 566 thousand from Germany, 259 thousand from the United Kingdom, and 233 thousand from Macedonia followed. The proportion of the number of tourists to Bulgaria from EU countries has shown a sharp increase; from 10.8% in 1996 to 48.1% in 2004. According to Bulgarian Association of Travel Agents, tourists from Japan totaled 95 thousand (as of November 2005), and the increase was 13%. Number of Tourists from Each Country EU Total Greek Germany UK Macedonia Russia Number of Tourists 235,848 44,625 104,000 32,044 - - 1996 Ratio 10.8% 2.0% 4.7% 1.5% - - Number of Tourists 1,930,429 707,453 565,337 259,092 223,031 120,523 2004 Ratio 48.1% 17.6% 14.1% 6.5% 5.6% 3.0% (Source: Department "National Policy of Tourism" , Ministry of Culture) Also according to Bulgarian Association of Travel Agents, 75% of the tourism revenue depends on stays and recreation at the coast of the Black Sea; 18% of it is from cultural and historical tourism.
    [Show full text]
  • Varna Pediatric Endocrine Society (Vapes)
    . VARNA PEDIATRIC ENDOCRINE SOCIETY (VAPES) PROGRAM Vth ISPAD/VAPES Postgraduate Course and Meeting “DIABETES AND RARE DISEASES” April 11-13th, 2019, Albena, Bulgaria 11.04.2019: 13.00 h - Arrival and accommodation (hotel “Flamingo Grand”, Albena). 14.00 h – 17.00 h - GROWTH MEASUREMENT AND ASSESSMENT SCHOOL. Raoul Rooman, Belgium; Iva Stoeva and Sonya Galcheva, Bulgaria (in Bulgarian and English). 17.30 – 17.45 h – Official opening /Veselin Boyadzhiev, Violeta Iotova/. 17.45 – 18.30 h - THE ROUTINE USE OF DIABETES TECHNOLOGY TO INCREASE TIME IN RANGE. Tadej Battelino, Ljubljana, Slovenia 18.30 – 19.00 h - Pharma symposium (Shire) 19.00 – 19.30 h - Pharma symposium (Lilly) 20.00 h – Dinner 12.04.2019: 08.30 – 09.00 h - Pharma symposium (Medtronic). 09.00 – 09.45 h – Pharma symposium (Pfizer). Ist session. MODERATORS: Veselin Boyadzhiev and Vilhelm Mladenov 09.45 – 10.15 h – UPDATES ON XLH – DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT. Anya Rothenbuhler, Paris, France 10.15 – 10.55 h – PRELIMINARY OVARIAN FAILURE. Noah Gruber, Tel Hashomer, Israel 10.55 – 11.00 h - questions to the speakers and discussion www.vapesbg.eu . 11.00 – 11.30 h – coffee break IInd session. MODERATORS: Maya Konstantinova and Galina Popova. 11.30 – 12.15 h – MONOGENIC FORMS OF AUTOIMMUNE DIABETES; CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES. Matthew Johnson, Diabetes Genes, University of Exeter, UK. 12.15 – 12.45 h – CHILDHOOD DIABETES IN THE REGION. Sladjana Todorovich, Belgrade, Serbia 12.45 – 13.00 h - questions to the speakers and discussion 13.00 – 14.00 h – Pharma symposium (Sanofi) 14.00 – 14.30 h – Lunch break. IIIrd session. MODERATORS: Iva Stoeva and Violeta Iotova.
    [Show full text]
  • The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in Each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” Prepared at the Request of the CONT Committee
    STUDY Requested by CONT Committee The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs Authors: Willem Pieter DE GROEN, Jorge NUNEZ, Daina BELICKA, Roberto EN MUSMECI, Damir GOJSIC and Silvia TADI Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 679.107– January 2021 The Largest 50 Beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds PRE-RELEASE Abstract This report provides the preliminary findings of the study on “The Largest 50 beneficiaries in each EU Member State of CAP and Cohesion Funds” prepared at the request of the CONT committee. It provides the results of an assessment of almost 300 systems for the public disclosure of the beneficiaries of the common agricultural policy (CAP) and cohesion policy. Moreover, it provides the preliminary results for the analysis of about 10 million beneficiaries of the CAP in 2018 and 2019 and more than 500 000 projects receiving cohesion funds between 2014 and 2020. Finally, it assesses the barriers to more data transparency and the possibilities to enhance the transparency. NOTE: This is a pre-release version of the study. Changes may occur based on the final results of the research. For internal use only. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Budgetary Control. It designated Ms Monika Hohlmeier to follow the study. AUTHORS Willem Pieter DE GROEN, CEPS Jorge NUNEZ, CEPS Daina BELICKA, CSE COE Roberto MUSMECI, CEPS Damir GOJSIC, CEPS Silvia TADI, CEPS The authors would like to thank Daniele Genta, Babak Hakimi and Xinyi Li for their valuable contributions to this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Veliko Tarnovo Furniture Cluster Bulgaria Production Sites with Furniture Clusters
    Veliko Tarnovo Furniture Cluster Bulgaria Production Sites with Furniture Clusters 1 SZCZECINEK FURNITURE CLUSTER 5 - TVILUM - STOL-TAP - GRZEŚKOWIAK - BHK - GREEN ANGEL - WOOD TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE - POZNAŃ - ABO 2 SMORGON FURNITURE CLUSTER USA 3 LAPOVO FURNITURE CLUSTER 4 SZOMBATHELY FURNITURE CLUSTER 6 5 OXFORD FURNITURE CLUSTER 2 1 6 ELEKTROGORSK FURNITURE CLUSTER 7 VELIKO TARNOVO FURNITURE CLUSTER 4 8 8 SEBES FURNITURE CLUSTER 3 7 2 3 Support for businesses • We would like to share our location and extend our premises in order to provide our partners with a built area to install furniture production facilities. • The required infrastructure is already in place: Our location is equipped with high voltage power supply, gas supply, adequate water supply and waste water treatment facilities. Separate meters will be provided for the furniture factory. • Property tax and local fees are administrated by Kronospan. • Close proximity between the two manufacturing sites results in near zero transportation costs. • Just in time delivery of raw and melamine-faced particleboard will result in no stock – which eliminates the burden on cash flow. • Kronospan will keep the agreed minimum stock levels. • We would provide you with access to our extensive product portfolio. • You could benefit from technical support in material processing on-site. Our engineers are experienced in both furniture production technology and equipment – whether that’s mechanical, electrical, automation software or robotics. • Kronospan will support you with administrative issues, including registration of a legal entity, the local register and banks. • We could also provide support with accounting, tax and payroll regulations as well as reconciliation of local accounting with internal reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport and Logistics in Bulgaria
    Investing in your future EUROPEAN UNION OP “Development of the Competitiveness of the Bulgarian European Regional Economy” 2007-2013 Development Fund Project “Promoting the advantages of investing in Bulgaria” BG 161PO003-4.1.01-0001-C0001, with benefi ciary InvestBulgaria Agency, has been implemented with the fi nancial support of the European Union through the European Fund for Regional Development and the national budget of the Republic of Bulgaria. TRANSPORT AND LOGISTICS IN BULGARIA CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 2. Overview of Bulgaria 10 3. Overview of the Transport& Logistics sector 14 4. Human Resources 45 5. Success Stories 53 Introduction Bulgaria is ideally located to provide easy access to Turkey, and the Middle East 4 Introductiont the markets in Europe, Russia, the CIS countires, BULGARIA is a member of the EUROPEAN UNION which stands for FREE MOVEMENT OF GOODS FIVE PAN-EUROPEAN CORRIDORS pass through the country TRACECA (TRAnsport Corridor Europe – Caucasus – Asia) links Bulgaria with Central Asia Source: InvestBulgaria Agency 5 Introduction Bulgaria offers easy access to the EU, Russia and the CIS countries, and the Middle East at the same time City Sofi a Belgrade Budapest Distance Days by Distance Days by Distance Days by (km) truck (km) truck (km) truck European Union Munich 1 097 3 773 2 564 1 Antwerp 1 711 4 1 384 3 1 137 2 Milan 1 167 3 885 2 789 1 Piraeus 525 1 806 2 1 123 3 Russia and CIS Moscow 1 777 5 1 711 5 1 565 5 Kiev 1 021 4 976 3 894 3 Middle East Istanbul 503 1 809 2 1 065 3 Kuwait City 2 623 12 2 932 13 3
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria 2016 International Religious Freedom Report
    BULGARIA 2016 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution provides for freedom of religion and conscience. The law requires religious groups to register to be eligible for certain benefits, including the right to receive state funding, operate schools and hospitals, and receive property tax exemptions. The constitution recognizes Eastern Orthodox Christianity as the country’s “traditional” religion, and the law exempts the Bulgarian Orthodox Church from the registration requirement. In September the National Assembly passed a law restricting the wearing of face-covering garments in public places. In July the Supreme Cassation Court vacated the guilty verdict of one Muslim leader charged with spreading Salafi Islam and hatred of other religious groups. In February the Pazardjik District Court started a trial against 14 Roma Muslims for propagating antidemocratic ideology and incitement to war and aiding foreign fighters. Minority religious groups, including Jehovah’s Witnesses, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (Mormons), and Muslims reported incidents of harassment and hostile rhetoric by members of some political parties and said the government failed to prosecute religiously motivated attacks against their members. Schools banned the wearing of religious symbols, including the hijab and cross, and some local governments continued to deny requests to construct new mosques or repair old ones. The Supreme Cassation Court suspended the Muslim community’s restitution claims, pending review of whether it was the rightful successor to confiscated properties. Minority groups reported discrimination and prejudice from local authorities in certain municipalities. Mormons and Jehovah’s Witnesses reported physical assaults and harassment against members of their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Curbing Corruption and Improving Transparency in Municipal Council Work in Bulgaria
    CURBING CORRUPTION AND IMPROVING TRANSPARENCY IN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL WORK IN BULGARIA A POLICY PAPER By Antony Galabov and A HANDBOOK For Effective Advocacy SOFIA 2000 Transparency International - Bulgaria Sofia, 3 Bistritza str. www.transparency-bg.org This edition is the product of a one-year project, implemented by Transparency International-Bulgaria in 1999-2000 and sponsored by the Local Government Initiative of the Open Society Institute - Budapest. 2 Curbing corruption and improving transparency in Municipal Council work in Bulgaria CURBING CORRUPTION AND IMPROVING TRANSPARENCY IN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL WORK IN BULGARIA: A policy outlook form seven Bulgarian Municipalities Table of Content GENERAL BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................5 THEORETICAL MODEL AND PROJECT SCOPE.........................................................................5 UNDERSTANDING CORRUPTION: THE LOCAL PERPOECTIVE ...........................................7 THE PUBLIC IMAGE OF THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL...............................................................8 PRINICPLES OF FUNCTIONALITY AND EFFECTIVE INTERACTION...............................1O SESSIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL COUNCILS: RESULTS AND CHALLANGES....................11 PREREQUISITES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR INTERACTION .............................................12 CONCLUSION.....................................................................................................................................14 3 Transparency
    [Show full text]