DOCSLIB.ORG

Coller Venture Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coller Venture Review Coller Venture Review Review Coller Venture Coller | December 2019 Venture Review Coller School of Management Tel Aviv University December 2019 Venture Policy and Management New Venture Creation in the Gig Economy Deep Innovation Blockchain – for Better or Worse? Virtual Roundtable University-led Entrepreneurship Trends in Venture Opportunities in the Investment Future Industry Analysis Fashion Technology Letter from the Editor oller Venture Review, the flagship Bridging the dialog between theory and journal of the Coller Institute of practice is particularly significant at a Venture at Tel Aviv University, time when action-oriented entrepreneurs C relaunches with this issue in a must rapidly adapt from the field. This new format. To start, we retain our core presents a rare opportunity to develop focus on bringing together theory and generalizable new insights and feedback practice. We believe that fostering the loops. The imperative is even greater dialog between academics and practitioners when one considers that the substantive is critical to successful and sustainable outcome we seek to address – successful new venture creation. It broadens our and sustainable new venture creation – can perspective and the range of views we can affect life-altering fields including health, integrate into a new synthesis. In its most education, food, agriculture and many others. applied perspective, it helps us engage This is the place to thank Leslie Broudo in new ways of thinking related to the Mitts, our Managing Editor, for her endless conceptualization, financing, and execution efforts and dedication, Josh Lerner, our of innovation and new venture creation. Associate Editor from Harvard Business While our core focus has remained consistent, School, for his insightful comments our approach to tackling the content has and suggestions and Tal Sossover, our evolved. In each issue, starting with the editorial assistant. Special thanks to all our current one, we address four sections: Venture contributors, colleagues, and collaborators Policy and Management; Deep Innovation; worldwide for their dedication and vision. Trends in Venture; and, to support future While the results of our work will not be generations of researchers, Industry Analysis. measurable in weeks or months, we hope Each section includes the perspective this first step can help guide our future. We of both academics and practitioners. welcome any comments and suggestions from In addition, we also report insights from our readers that will help us improve the value the perspective of a Virtual Roundtable, to of Coller Venture Review to its readership. bring together global leaders in a specific Sincerely, field of interest – in this case, university- led entrepreneurship. We expect that future issues of the Journal will include case studies to help isolate best practices, and a reader’s digest of outstanding articles in the fields of entrepreneurship, Moshe Zviran innovation and new venture creation. Editor-in-Chief 01 Coller 4 56 92 Venture Policy and Management Virtual Roundtable Industry Analysis Venture New Venture Creation in the Gig Economy University-led Entrepreneurship Fashion Technology Review 7 3 Steps to Build a Labor Market Freddy Boey 94 The Impact of Technology on for the Gig Economy Deputy President, National University of Singapore the Global Fashion Supply Chain Diane Mulcahy Anjani Jain Jacqueline M. Jenkins Author, The Gig Economy Deputy Dean, Yale School of Management Executive Director of Strategic Planning and Innovation, Fashion Institute of Technology Jonathan Levin 14 The Future of Cities in the Dean, Graduate School of Business, Stanford University Gig Economy Stephen Spinelli Carmen Ferrigno President, Babson College Vice President Communications, Saint-Gobain Corporation Kar Yan Tam Dean, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology 23 The Challenge Regulating Moshe Zviran Big Tech Platforms Dean, Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University Eric K. Clemons Professor of Operations and Information Management, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 77 Bringing Entrepreneurial Theory to Practice in the Classroom Michellana Jester Lecturer and Course Faculty Lead, MIT Sloan School of Management 32 82 Deep Innovation Trends in Venture Blockchain — for Better or Worse? Opportunities in the Investment Future 35 Blockchain Revolution Without the Blockchain? 85 Democratizing the World of Hanna Halaburda Venture Capital Associate Professor of Technology, Operations and Statistics, Jonathan Medved Stern School of Business, New York University Founder and CEO, OurCrowd 44 The Darker Side of Blockchain Nouriel Roubini Professor of Economics and International Business, Stern School of Business, New York University 50 Blockchain as a Solution to Cyber Threats in the Smart Grid of the Future Jacob Mendel Head of the Cyber-Security Track, Coller School of Management Coller School of Management, Tel Aviv University Tel Aviv University 03 Overview iv ur Trends in Venture section addresses change 85 in a new venture creation over the last twenty- Democratizing the five years. This issue considers a visionary’s practical perspective on leading change and World of Venture Capital O sharing wealth. Jonathan Medved Jonathan Medved, Founder and CEO of OurCrowd, Founder and CEO, OurCrowd considers not global risk but ways to reduce risk for individual investors. Medved’s democratization of the venture capital investment process helps us to consider how private and traditionally hard-to-access financial Trends in Venture markets can be made accessible equitably, and how even small investors can participate in a future of Opportunities in the transformative and profitable new venture creation. Investment Future 82 COLLER VENTURE REVIEW 83 Democratizing the World of Venture Capital Jonathan Medved Founder and CEO, OurCrowd ince its inception in 2013, OurCrowd has been committed to democratize access to venture If growth opportunities S capital while maintaining best venture practices for a new class of investors. have shifted — not all the The opportunity and time for OurCrowd’s way, but to a substantial innovations are driven by a number of extent — into private factors. These include consistent high returns in the asset class, which nevertheless have markets and ordinary benefitted only a small subset of investors; investors don’t have increasing difficulty in accessing the best deals, as top deals stay private longer and access to them, that’s not then IPO at extraordinary valuations. On top good… It’s hard to give of the above, all but the most sophisticated investors have not been granted standard individuals access to private economic preferences, which are critical markets. Can we have a to offset risk and preserve upside. fund structure to ensure Opportunity and Differentiation that ordinary investors are Compared to other seemingly similar getting the same deal? “crowdfunding” platforms, the OurCrowd platform is distinguished in a number of ways. Testimony to its vision and success in education, it currently has 40,000 accredited investors Jay Clayton from over 180 countries who access highly Chairman US Securities curated individual venture deals and venture and Exchange Commission capital fund. The emphasis is on investing September 19, 2019 relatively large amounts from aggregated individuals and institutions via an LP/ GP structure. Median check size is $3.5M per portfolio deal, with many companies raising amounts beyond $10M. • 84 COLLER VENTURE REVIEW 85 OurCrowd has already invested in over 200 Democratizing Access to Venture JUMP Bikes – aquired portfolio companies and 19 funds, and has had Investing – and Offsetting Risk by Uber in April 2018 36 portfolio exits to date, including leading Increased companies such as Beyond Meat (BYND), Venture capital as an asset class has performed JUMP Bikes (sold to Uber), Wave (sold to well for its investors over the decades, in commitments to H&R Block), and Argus (sold to Continental). fact generally outperforming all other asset classes. And yet, it has been the most esoteric, venture capital OurCrowd often leads its deals; invests most inaccessible asset class even for many and the formation alongside leading venture funds; gets large institutional investors. The number of Board seat representation in a majority institutions that have significant commitments of mega funds – of its deals; purchases preferred stock; to venture is actually rather limited; accredited like the $100B and receives anti-dilution protection, and ordinary investors can only dream. Yet, pre-emptive rights and liquidation particularly as fast-growing companies stay Softbank Vision preferences – just like traditional private longer and seem to take forever to Fund – have venture investors. go public, it is clear that the need to open up The model has proven successful thus access to this closed club of venture investing driven dramatic far. OurCrowd has been recognized by is becoming imperative. The question is growth in venture Pitchbook since 2014 as the most active how to execute on this “democratization” venture investor in the highly competitive in a way that will both benefit the venture capital investments Israeli venture market, achieving this ecosystem and the companies it serves, globally status only one year after its launch. as well as provide compelling returns and protections for a broad range of new investors. OurCrowd – and the idea behind it – might Yale University Endowment, a leading These increased
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Crowdfunding in Asia
    Crowdfunding in Asia May 2018 Introducing the first free directory of crowdfunding platforms across Asia. The data is based on the AlliedCrowds Capital Finder, a database of over 7,000 alternative finance capital providers across emerging markets. Our data has been used by organizations like FSD Asia, UNDP, World Green Economy Organization, GIZ, World Bank, and others in order to provide unique, actionable insights into the world of emerging market alternative finance. This is the latest of our regular reports on alternative finance in emerging markets; you can find all previous reports here. Crowdfunding rose in prominence in the post-financial crisis years (starting in 2012), and for good reason: a global credit crunch limited the amount of funding available to entrepreneurs and small businesses. Since then, crowdfunding has grown rapidly around the world. Crowdfunding is especially consequential in countries where SMEs find it difficult to raise capital to start or grow their businesses. This is the case in many Asian countries; according to the SME Finance Forum, there is a $2.3 trillion MSME credit gap in East Asia and the Pacific. Crowdfunding can help to fill this gap by offering individuals and small businesses an alternative source of capital. This can come in the form of donation-based as well as lending-based (peer-to-peer or peer-to-business) crowdfunding. In order to help entrepreneurs and small business owners to find the crowdfunding platform that’s right for them, we are releasing the first publicly available list of all crowdfunding platforms across Asia. The report is split into two key sections: the first one is an overview of crowdfunding platforms, and how active they are across the largest markets on the continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Powering the Crowd Into the Future
    POWERING THE CROWD INTO THE FUTURE KEY LEARNINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS Davinia Cogan, Peter Weston POWERING THE CROWD INTO THE FUTURE KEY LEARNINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENERGY ACCESS CROWDFUNDING AND P2P LENDING CONTENTS BIOS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INTRODUCTION 6 1 STATE OF THE MARKET 8 2 THE 6 CAMPAIGN ARCHETYPES 12 1. PARTNERSHIP MODELS 15 CASE STUDY: TAHUDE FOUNDATION 16 2. ONE-OFF FUNDRAISERS 17 CASE STUDY: RAFODE 19 CASE STUDY: SOLARIS OFFGRID 20 3. MEGA-CAMPAIGNS 22 4. P2P MICROLENDING 23 CASE STUDY: EMERGING COOKING SOLUTIONS 24 5. ONLINE DEBT-BASED SECURITIES 26 CASE STUDY: SIMUSOLAR 27 CASE STUDY: AZURI TECHNOLOGIES 29 5.EQUITY CROWDFUNDING 31 CASE STUDY: TRINE 32 3 INTERVENTIONS TO CATALYSE FUNDING 34 4 CROWD POWER UPDATE 37 CONCLUSION 39 REFERENCES 41 This material has been funded by UK aid from the UK government; however the views expressed do not necessarily reflect the UK government’s official policies. Published December 2018 Design: www.dougdawson.co.uk Front cover by C.Schubert BIOS Davinia Cogan Peter Weston Davinia Cogan is the Programme Peter Weston is the Director of Manager of Crowd Power at Energy Advisory Services at Energy 4 Impact. 4 Impact. She runs the UK aid He manages a team of consultants funded programme, which explores that advises off-grid SMEs in Sub the role of incentives to stimulate Saharan Africa and helps them to donation, reward, debt and equity implement new business models crowdfunding in the off-grid energy and technologies. He is an expert sector in Sub- Saharan Africa and in power, renewables and off- South Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Trend Analysis the Israeli Unit 8200 an OSINT-Based Study CSS
    CSS CYBER DEFENSE PROJECT Trend Analysis The Israeli Unit 8200 An OSINT-based study Zürich, December 2019 Risk and Resilience Team Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study Author: Sean Cordey © 2019 Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich Contact: Center for Security Studies Haldeneggsteig 4 ETH Zurich CH-8092 Zurich Switzerland Tel.: +41-44-632 40 25 [email protected] www.css.ethz.ch Analysis prepared by: Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich ETH-CSS project management: Tim Prior, Head of the Risk and Resilience Research Group, Myriam Dunn Cavelty, Deputy Head for Research and Teaching; Andreas Wenger, Director of the CSS Disclaimer: The opinions presented in this study exclusively reflect the authors’ views. Please cite as: Cordey, S. (2019). Trend Analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study. Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zürich. 1 Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study . Table of Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Historical Background 5 2.1 Pre-independence intelligence units 5 2.2 Post-independence unit: former capabilities, missions, mandate and techniques 5 2.3 The Yom Kippur War and its consequences 6 3 Operational Background 8 3.1 Unit mandate, activities and capabilities 8 3.2 Attributed and alleged operations 8 3.3 International efforts and cooperation 9 4 Organizational and Cultural Background 10 4.1 Organizational structure 10 Structure and sub-units 10 Infrastructure 11 4.2 Selection and training process 12 Attractiveness and motivation 12 Screening process 12 Selection process 13 Training process 13 Service, reserve and alumni 14 4.3 Internal culture 14 5 Discussion and Analysis 16 5.1 Strengths 16 5.2 Weaknesses 17 6 Conclusion and Recommendations 18 7 Glossary 20 8 Abbreviations 20 9 Bibliography 21 2 Trend analysis: The Israeli Unit 8200 – An OSINT-based study selection tests comprise a psychometric test, rigorous Executive Summary interviews, and an education/skills test.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHLIGHTS and SUMMARY the Startup World Gathered in Jerusalem During the First Week of March for 600 the 2019 Ourcrowd Global Investor Summit
    18,000+ Registered to attend from 189 countries 1,200 Entrepreneurs HIGHLIGHTS AND SUMMARY The startup world gathered in Jerusalem during the first week of March for 600 the 2019 OurCrowd Global Investor Summit. Over 18,000 people registered to attend from 189 countries. Entrepreneurs, venture capitalists, corporate Multinational corporate representatives, investors, government officials, and press engaged in a packed representatives week of activities, including tech and press tours, corporate meetups, VC forums, insider access to accelerators, labs, and startups – and of course, some great partying. 470 Venture capitalists The Summit has become one of the largest and most important tech events in the world and the biggest business event in Israel’s history, taking over the iconic International Convention Center in Jerusalem, as well as other venues in both Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. 210 The programming was incredibly diverse, with some 80 different sessions and over 200 Speakers speakers, providing unprecedented insight into the world of startup venture capital. On Summit Day, March 7, almost every hall was at or over capacity. 215 The 103 exhibitors and 65 sponsors broke records, as did the number of accredited Delegations investors, VCs, and multinational corporations represented. Attendees were plunged from 140 countries into a sensory experience of hands-on interaction with breakthrough technologies, insights from industry leaders, doers, and thinkers, and the shoulder-to-shoulder all-day networking that is unique to the Summit. 1,000+ Summit Week, with a record 24 events, has now become an institution in Israel. Scheduled Highlights were the new OurCrowd Advisory Forums, which harness the extensive networking knowledge and experience held by OurCrowd’s top-tier investors and corporate meetings partners, as well as the OurCrowd Pre-Summit Leaders Forum, an all-business event for the elite of the ecosystem, oversubscribed with 800 attendees.
    [Show full text]
  • Entrepreneurial Finance and Productivity in Different Institutional Contexts: Lessons from Equity Crowdfunding
    CHAPTER 8 Entrepreneurial Finance and Productivity in Different Institutional Contexts: Lessons from Equity Crowdfunding Douglas Cumming and Sofia Johan To finance growth, entrepreneurial firms need external financing. While bank finance is the most common for entrepreneurial firms,34 many firms do not have sufficient collateral and/or stable cash flows to enable them to obtain or maintain debt finance. Equity finance has traditionally been available from angel investors and venture capitalists (VCs). But the pres- ence of angels and VCs does not imply that the market for entrepreneurial finance is complete or without gaps of underserved entrepreneurs with good ideas and scant capital. In most countries around the world over the last decade, the biggest change to the landscape of equity finance for entrepreneurs has been the introduction of equity crowdfunding (Cum- ming and Johan, 2019). There is substantial evidence consistent with the view that equity crowdfunding facilitates productivity growth. Equity crowdfunding deep- ens capital markets for startups, particularly at the most nascent stage of entrepreneurial firm development, thereby lowering costs of entry for startups. As such, equity crowdfunding is an important instrument for introducing and spreading new technology, which improves productivity. Empirical evidence is supportive. For example, large sample evidence is consistent with the view that crowdfunding improves small firm growth (Eldridge, Nisar, and Torchia, 2019; Stevenson, Kuratko, and Eutsler, 2019), enables the development of smart cities (Carè, Trotta, Carè, and Rizzello, 34 See Cosh et al. (2009) for UK evidence, and Robb and Robinson (2014) for US evidence. fraserinstitute.org / 69 70 / Achieving the 4-Day Work Week: Essays on Improving Productivity Growth in Canada 2018), and enables firms to get to the next level in subsequent capital raises (Signoria and Vismara, 2018).35 Given the importance of equity crowdfunding to entrepreneurial finance and productivity, in this chapter we address two interrelated ques- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Executive Compensation Contracts Maximize Firm Value? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment
    Do executive compensation contracts maximize firm value? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment Menachem (Meni) Abudy Bar-Ilan University, School of Business Administration, Ramat-Gan, Israel, 5290002 Dan Amiram Columbia University Graduate School of Business, 3022 Broadway, New York, NY 10027 Tel Aviv University, Coller School of Management, Ramat Aviv, Israel, 6997801 Oded Rozenbaum The George Washington University, 2201 G St. NW, Washington, DC 20052 Efrat Shust College of Management Academic Studies, School of Business, Rishon LeZion, Israel, 7549071 Current Draft: May 2017 First Draft: September 2016 For discussion purposes only. Please do not distribute. Please do not cite without the authors permission. Abstract: There is considerable debate on whether executive compensation contracts are a designed to maximize firm value or a result of rent extraction. The endogenous nature of executive pay contracts limits the ability of prior research to answer this question. In this study, we utilize the events surrounding a surprising and quick enactment of a new law that restricts executive pay to a binding upper limit in the insurance, investment and banking industries. This quasi-natural experiment enables clear identification. If compensation contracts are value maximizing, any outside restriction to the contract will diminish its optimality and hence should reduce firm value. In contrast to the predictions of the value maximization view of compensation contracts, we find significantly positive abnormal returns in these industries in multiple short term event windows around the passing of the law. We find that the effect is concentrated only for firms in which the restriction is binding. We find similar results using a regression discontinuity design, when we restrict our sample to firms with executive payouts that are just below and just above the law’s pay limit.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for Startups and Entrepreneurs Microwork
    Resources for Startups and Entrepreneurs 1. Microwork 2. Sharing Economy 3. The Investment Cycle 4. EU SME and Startup Funds 5. Microlending, Microfinancing, and Microcredit 6. Crowdfunding (P2P Financing) 7. Alternative Lending 8. Vendor/PO Financing and Online Factoring 9. Other Sources of Financing 10 Resources Microwork (get paid for fulfilling tasks online) Amazon Mechanical Turk LiveOps InnoCentive Samasource Paid online survey sites Kindle Direct Publishing (self-publishing) Craiglist (classified ads) Monster (find a job) Newsy or CNN iReport (citizen journalism) YouTube Partner (share ad revenues) CCNow (accept credit cards and PayPal payments) Amazon Associates (get a commission on referred sales) EBay or Etsy or Alibaba (sell things, including handicrafts) Shareconomy (Sharing Economy) View introductory video AirBnB or Couchsurfing (share your home for a fee) Eatwith or Kitchensurfing (host a meal and get paid) Vayable (become a tour guide) Uber or Lyft or Sidecar (give rides in your car) BorrowedBling or Girl Meets Dress or Rent the Runway (lend your jewelry and haute couture for a fee) Yerdle or Snap Goods (Simplist) or Open Shed (swap, rent, or borrow things) Relay Rides or Getaround (rent out your car) Favor Delivery (get deliveries – or deliver) Task Rabbit (handyman services) Waze (community rides) The Investment Cycle Register firm in target market Doing Business Equity structure Common stock Stock options Convertible debt Series A Preferred Stock (convertible to common stock on IPO/sale) Investment Cycle - Overview Seed
    [Show full text]
  • Crowd Power – Success & Failure, the Key to a Winning Campaign
    CROWD POWER Success & Failure: The Key to a Winning Campaign Davinia Cogan and Simon Collings 1 CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................3 2.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................5 3.0 The Layers of Success ..............................................................................................................................7 3.1 Donation .........................................................................................................................................................11 3.1.1 Choosing the Right Platform....................................................................................................................................................................11 3.1.2 The Campaign Period ..................................................................................................................................................................................13 3.1.3 Implementing Campaign Goals & Success into the Future .......................................................................................16 3.1.4 Q&A – Kenya Green Supply ..............................................................................................................................................18 3.2 Reward ..........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 Fintech Meets Alternative Investments
    FT PARTNERS FINTECH INDUSTRY RESEARCH Alternative Investments FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Innovation in a Burgeoning Asset Class March 2020 DRAFT ©2020 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments Alternative Investments FT Partners | Focused Exclusively on FinTech FT Partners’ Advisory Capabilities FT Partners’ FinTech Industry Research Private Capital Debt & Raising Equity Sell-Side / In-Depth Industry Capital Buy-Side Markets M&A Research Reports Advisory Capital Strategic Structuring / Consortium Efficiency Proprietary FinTech Building Advisory FT Services FINTECH Infographics Partners RESEARCH & Board of INSIGHTS Anti-Raid Advisory Directors / Advisory / Monthly FinTech Special Shareholder Committee Rights Plans Market Analysis Advisory Sell-Side Valuations / LBO Fairness FinTech M&A / Financing Advisory Opinion for M&A Restructuring Transaction Profiles and Divestitures Named Silicon Valley’s #1 FinTech Banker Ranked #1 Most Influential Person in all of Numerous Awards for Transaction (2016) and ranked #2 Overall by The FinTech in Institutional Investors “FinTech Excellence including Information Finance 40” “Deal of the Decade” • Financial Technology Partners ("FT Partners") was founded in 2001 and is the only investment banking firm focused exclusively on FinTech • FT Partners regularly publishes research highlighting the most important transactions, trends and insights impacting the global Financial Technology landscape. Our unique insight into FinTech is a direct result of executing hundreds of transactions in the sector combined with over 18 years of exclusive focus on Financial Technology FT PARTNERS RESEARCH 2 FinTech Meets Alternative Investments I. Executive Summary 5 II. Industry Overview and The Rise of Alternative Investments 8 i. An Introduction to Alternative Investments 9 ii. Trends Within the Alternative Investment Industry 23 III. Executive Interviews 53 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender Dynamics in Crowdfunding
    Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/rof/advance-article/doi/10.1093/rof/rfaa041/6039186 by Kungl Tekniska Hogskolan Biblioteket user on 10 February 2021 Review of Finance, 2021, 1–40 doi: 10.1093/rof/rfaa041 Advance Access Publication Date: 16 December 2020 Gender Dynamics in Crowdfunding (Kickstarter): Evidence on Entrepreneurs, Backers, and Taste-Based Discrimination* Hadar Gafni1,2, Dan Marom3, Alicia Robb4, and Orly Sade3 1Department of Strategy and Innovation, Copenhagen Business School, 2KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 3The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and 4University of Colorado at Boulder Abstract This study focuses on the launch phase of the leading reward-based crowdfunding market—Kickstarter. It documents the behavior of male and female entrepreneurs in raising early stage capital. We find that women share as entrepreneurs in the plat- form (34.7%) does not equal to their share in the overall population, and they are concentrated in stereotyped sectors, both as entrepreneurs and as backers. We also find that women do not set lower funding goals than men, they enjoy higher rates of success than men, even after controlling for project categories and funding goals, and that backers of both genders have a tendency to fund entrepreneurs of their own gender. Our survey of Kickstarter backers finds evidence of taste-based dis- crimination by male backers. JEL classification: G29, G41, L26, J16 Keywords: Crowdfunding, Discrimination, Gender, Early stage financing Received November 11, 2020; accepted November 24, 2020 by Editor
    [Show full text]
  • Success Drivers of Online Equity Crowdfunding Campaigns
    DECSUP-12711; No of Pages 13 Decision Support Systems xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Decision Support Systems journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dss Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns Anna Lukkarinen a,1, Jeffrey E. Teich b,2, Hannele Wallenius c,3, Jyrki Wallenius a,⁎ a School of Business, Aalto University, P.O. Box 21220, 00076 Aalto, Finland b College of Business, New Mexico State University, MSC 3DJ, P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003-8001, USA c School of Science, Aalto University, P.O. Box 15500, 00076 Aalto, Finland article info abstract Article history: While equity crowdfunding provides ventures with an opportunity to collect funding from a large base of inves- Received 30 September 2015 tors, many campaigns tend to remain unsuccessful. We draw from two fields of financing adjacent to equity Received in revised form 31 March 2016 crowdfunding, venture capital (VC) and angel investing, as well as rewards-based crowdfunding, to develop an Accepted 25 April 2016 understanding of the drivers of investment decisions in equity crowdfunding. Using data from a leading equity Available online xxxx crowdfunding platform in Northern Europe, we explore factors that drive the number of investors and amount of funding attracted by equity crowdfunding campaigns. The results suggest that the investment decision criteria Keywords: Equity crowdfunding traditionally used by VCs or business angels are not of prime importance for success in equity crowdfunding. In- Online platforms stead, success is related to pre-selected crowdfunding campaign characteristics and the utilization of private and Entrepreneurial finance public networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Authentication: Technology and Implementation Issues Moshe Zviran Tel Aviv University, [email protected]
    Communications of the Association for Information Systems Volume 17 Article 4 January 2006 Identification and Authentication: Technology and Implementation Issues Moshe Zviran Tel Aviv University, [email protected] Zippy Erlich The Open University of Israel Follow this and additional works at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais Recommended Citation Zviran, Moshe and Erlich, Zippy (2006) "Identification and Authentication: Technology and Implementation Issues," Communications of the Association for Information Systems: Vol. 17 , Article 4. DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.01704 Available at: https://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol17/iss1/4 This material is brought to you by the AIS Journals at AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). It has been accepted for inclusion in Communications of the Association for Information Systems by an authorized administrator of AIS Electronic Library (AISeL). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Communications of Association for Information Systems (Volume 17 2006) 90-105 90 IDENTIFICATION AND AUTHENTICATION: TECHNOLOGY AND IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES Moshe Zviran Tel Aviv University [email protected] Zippy Erlich The Open University of Israel ABSTRACT Computer-based information systems in general, and Internet e-commerce and e-business systems in particular, employ many types of resources that need to be protected against access by unauthorized users. Three main components of access control are used in most information systems: identification, authentication, and authorization. In this paper we focus on authentication, which is the most problematic component. The three main approaches to user authentication are: knowledge-based, possession-based, and biometric-based. We review and compare the various authentication mechanisms of these approaches and the technology and implementation issues they involve.
    [Show full text]