Spiders from the Chickens Islands, New Zealand, by D.J. Court, P 125

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spiders from the Chickens Islands, New Zealand, by D.J. Court, P 125 TANE 30, 1984 SPIDERS FROM THE CHICKENS ISLANDS, NEW ZEALAND by D.J. Court Port Moresby International High School, P.O. Box 276, Boroko, Papua New Guinea SUMMARY Sixty four spider species have been collected from Mauitaha, Lady Alice, Middle Rock, Whatupuke, Coppermine and Pupuha Islands which form most of the Chickens Group lying east of Whangarei, Northland. The list includes 20 unidentified species and the majority of these are probably undescribed. Nearly all the named species are native forms expected from Northland coastal forest and seashore. The recently-arrived Australian two-spined (Poecilopachys australasia (Griffith and Pigeon) ) is a most interesting exception; at least one spider ling seems to have ballooned its way to Mauitaha Island; a distance of at least 10 km from the mainland. INTRODUCTION The study of spiders in New Zealand native communities is still in its infancy. While there has been great progress by Dr R.R. Forster (Director, Otago Museum) in working through the overall fauna, little is known of spider assemblages on offshore islands and one has to glean records from hundreds of distribution lists for taxa given in Forster's Bulletins (1968—1979). Marples (1956) and Court (1982) have published initial working lists for the Three Kings and Poor Knights Groups respectively. The Chickens Islands (35°85' S, 174°80' E) lie 20-25 km east of Bream Bay, which is to the south of Whangarei Harbour. They are reserves within the Hauraki Gulf Maritime Park and were visited from 30 December, 1981 to 8 January, 1982 by members of the Offshore Islands Research Group (O.I.R.G.). Of the spiders collected during this trip, only two species have previously been recorded from the Chickens. Forster (1973) notes that an unnamed collector gathered the large sheet- weaver Cambridgea foliata and Hexathele kohua from Lady Alice Island (Big Chicken) in December 1953. A number of species have been collected from the nearby Hen Island (Taranga) by E.G. Turbott and other workers. Spiders were obtained directly from webs or retreats, beating foliage, pitfall and malaise traps and sieving of leaf litter. Much of the collecting was carried out at night. The specimens were preserved in 70% ethanol and identified at the Otago Museum by the author (D.J. C.) or by Dr R.R. Forster. They are now lodged in the Otago Museum, Great King Street, Dunedin. 125 A GENERAL ACCOUNT OF THE SPIDERS OBVIOUS ON LADY ALICE ISLAND As spiders are not well known to most biologists, the following account is given in an effort to familiarise field workers with some of this most interesting group. [It is suggested it be read in conjunction with 'New Zealand Spiders - an Introduction' by R.R. and L.M. Forster (1973)]. On landing on the island, the first place to search is the rocky shore, just at the top of the Nerita zone. Bright white silken retreats in rock crevices are soon obvious. These are constructed of tough silk by the medium-sized Amaurobioides, a brown-black spider with chevron markings on the abdomen and with powerful chelicerae. During the night at low tide the spider waits at the entrance to the retreat with legs extending outwards. It preys on any small invertebrates such as kelp flies and isopods. This spider is often inundated by high tides and so seals itself in with a waterproof silken screen at the retreat entrance. One or two metres above, in much finer, double-entranced silken tubes is Otagoa. This is a smaller, pale-brown coloured spider which runs out at slight disturbances to its web. Both Otagoa and Amaurobioides tend to dwell on rocky cliffs or overhanging branches. These are shaded for at least part of the day and so remain cool and less obvious to predators. Further up, towards the white lichen zone, are the large black Ixeuticus (= Badumna) robustus. These require deep retreats. Because they live in rock or other crevices exposed to bright sun they must be somewhat resistant to high temperatures and dehydration. On extremely hot days, they move right out onto the web lattice and probably avoid the heat conducted through the rock to the inside of the retreat. In and out of the lichens moves the camouflaged, lichen-coloured unnamed jumping spider. Widely distributed around the seashore, and elsewhere, is the cobweb spider Achaearanea. It is found in a wide variety of situations - rock crevices, pohutukawa roots and trunks and clay banks. The web, about 10 cm across, has guy-lines with viscid silk on the base of strands where they are attached to the substrate. Small animals crawling along bump into and become attached to the strands. The spider on detecting the disturbance arrives and combs wrapping silk onto the prey. Insects much larger than the spider itself may be captured even though the fangs are small. Steatoda, a relative of Achaearanea, lives in more inaccessible, damper positions above the shore. It is a shiny chocolate- black and juveniles may have pairs of white dorsal abdominal spots, but is often mistaken for a katipo which shows similar prey-catching behaviour. Katipos were searched for in the drier central parts of Spinifex hirsutus growing above West Bay but only old webs were found. This species can be regarded as present on Lady Alice Island but in small numbers. 126 As the ascent of the shore progresses to the first woody vegetation, the large orb weaver Araneus pustulosus becomes obvious, its webs spun on guy-lines that stretch a metre or more. During the day the adults are usually hidden, their colours camouflaging them with bark, stone or whatever substrate their retreat. The ground colour of the dorsal abdominal 'folium' may range from black to 'lichen white'. At night it gains access to the hub of the web either by a silk thread to the edge of the web or by a guy-line directly leading to the centre of the hub. Whilst in the retreat it normally holds the guy-line with a hind claw and by this means it may be alerted to the arrival of prey. Younger spiders may remain in the orb during the day and as they grow, slowly develop a reddish colouring on the inside of the forelegs. In the karaka scrub just above the shore the first of the forest species are seen. Native spiders such as Araneus subcomptus (another well- camouflaged orb weaver) and Hexathele kohua spin their webs. Hexathele may grow very large and constructs bright white funnel-webs in crevices and holes in larger trunks. This species is related to the trapdoors but is in the family Dipluridae and does not actually build a 'door'. Old puriri moth tunnels are often occupied, with the spider 10 cm or more inside, below or above the entrance hole. The spider itself is medium brown, with distinctive light brown chevron markings on the abdomen. In the Utter under coastal forest there are at least 20 species, the most obvious being the speckled brown wolf spiders (Lycosa hilaris ?) and the fast-running Miturga. These two spiders run out from areas being cleared for campsites. The remainder of the litter species are mainly minute, and blend in with disturbed Utter until a few minutes have passed when they start moving around. On low vegetation at night, crab spiders, Sidymella species, move out from their daytime shelters. They take up positions at the bases of branchlets and at the ends of leaves and extend their two anterior pairs of legs in a raptorial pose; they simply wait for prey in this manner, which is seized immediately it comes into contact with the spider. Sidymella is particularly common in the small Uncinia and Carex sedges. Also at night, Clubiona itself may be captured by theridiid spiders. Often at night, the jumping spiders, Trite and other genera, may be seen hanging on 10 cm-long threads attached to the edges of leaves. This group hunts by day with the use of excellent vision and becomes quiescent at night - the hanging behaviour is probably protective against nocturnal invertebrate predators, including other spider species. In the foliage, two medium to small greenish species are very common. Both the crab spider Diaea albolimbata and the small, fast- running dictynid Paradictyna rufoflava may be found on packs and clothing after one has been pushing through vegetation. Diaea appears 127 to have moderate acuity of sight, though nowhere near that of the salticids, and moves below leaves when disturbed. Paradictyna lives in small webs spun under leaves between the leaf edge and midrib. They run out rapidly all over the plant's surface when they are disturbed and are hard to capture. The most distinctive webs in the forest are constructed by Cambridgea foliata. Large silk sheets with a lattice of threads above, extend out from holes in trunks and banks. The spider emerges at night and hangs 'upside down' below the sheet. The silk is so tough that the web 'catches' leaves and heavy twigs from the canopy above without itself being damaged. In these webs (and in those of Araneus pustulosus) may be found the quicksilver spider, Argyrodes antipodiana. This theridiid is much smaller than the host spider and is quite distinctive with its beautiful downward-hanging silvery abdomen. It moves 'stealthily' at one side of the host's web and cuts out small prey such as midges and sandflies without alerting the larger spider. It is therefore termed a kleptoparasite. ANNOTATED SPECIES LIST The list of species and notes below, are given firstly, in the sequence of families as found in Part II of Forster (1968) and later bulletins.
Recommended publications
  • Dna Sequence Data Indicates the Polyphyl Y of the Family Ctenidae (Araneae )
    1993. The Journal of Arachnology 21 :194–201 DNA SEQUENCE DATA INDICATES THE POLYPHYL Y OF THE FAMILY CTENIDAE (ARANEAE ) Kathrin C . Huber', Thomas S . Haider2, Manfred W . Miiller2, Bernhard A . Huber' , Rudolf J. Schweyen2, and Friedrich G . Barth' : 'Institut fair Zoologie, Althanstr . 14; 1090 Wien; and 2lnstitut fur Mikrobiologie and Genetik; Dr. Bohrgasse 9 ; 1030 Wien (Vienna), Austria . ABSTRACT. Mitochondrial DNA fragments comprising more than 400 bases of the 16S rDNA from nine spider species have been sequenced: Cupiennius salei, C. getazi, C. coccineus and Phoneutria boliviensis (Ctenidae), Pisaura mirabilis, Dolomedes fimbriatus (Pisauridae), Pardosa agrestis (Lycosidae), Clubiona pallidula (Clubi- onidae) and Ryuthela nishihirai (syn. Heptathela nishihirai; Heptathelidae: Mesothelae). Sequence divergence ranges from 3–4% among Cupiennius species and up to 36% in pairwise comparisons of the more distantly related spider DNAs. Maximally parsimonious gene trees based on these sequences indicate that Phoneutri a and Cupiennius are the most distantly related species of the examined Lycosoidea . The monophyly of the family Ctenidae is therefore doubted ; and a revision of the family, which should include DNA-data, is needed . Cupiennius salei (Ctenidae) is one of the most get a high copy number of the DNA segment of extensively studied species of spiders (see Lach - interest. The PCR depends on the availability of muth et al. 1985). The phylogeny of the Ctenidae , oligonucleotides that specifically bind to the a mainly South and Central American family, i s flanking sequences of this DNA segment. These poorly understood ; and systematists propose oligonucleotides serve as primers for a polymer- highly contradicting views on its classification ization reaction that copies the segment in vitro.
    [Show full text]
  • I/'Mei1can %Mllselim
    i/'meI1can %MllselIm Ntats PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY CENTRAL PARK WEST AT 79TH STREET, NEW YORK, N. Y. I0024 NUMBER 2292 APRIL 24, I967 Descriptions of the Spider Families Desidae and Argyronetidae BY VINCENT D. ROTH1 The marine spiders of the genus Desis Walckenaer and the Eurasian water spider Argyroneta aquatica (Clerck) have been considered by most arachnologists to be aberrant members of the family Agelenidae. The family Desidae was established in 1895 for Desis but since has been ignored. The family Argyronetidae, proposed in 1870, has been used as follows: exclusively for the genus Argyroneta Latreille; for Argyroneta and certain genera of cybaeinids as an expanded family; and for Argyroneta and the entire agelenid subfamily Cybaeinae. None of the revisers offered adequate reasons for his placement of the genera in the family Argyro- netidae. The present study was initiated because of the uncertain status of Desis and Argyroneta and the lack of published evidence supporting place- ment of them. As a result, I herein propose that each again be elevated to family status. The remaining genera previously associated with the family Argyronetidae belong to the subfamily Cybaeinae of the family Agelenidae (see Roth, 1967a, p. 302, for a description of the family). The differences among the three families of spiders are listed in table 1. 1 Resident Director, Southwestern Research Station of the American Museum of Natural History, Portal, Arizona. 0~~~~ 0.) 0Cc S- c .)00 0 0n Cd C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.) 0~~~~ C- 0.) 4 C0 U, 0~ z-o0 ID -~~~~0c - 4 Z 4.) 0 bID D < < ~~~~ 0~~C0.) -o C~~~~..4 C .0 v C bID ~~~"0 0 ~ 0 d 4-'.~~~~~4 + + 2 O 4.) ID 2 0 10 u0r 0 -o 6U 4- 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 73, Number
    New Zealand Science Review Vol 73 (3–4) 2016 Symposium on Systematics and Biodiversity in honour of Dr Dennis P. Gordon Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists ISSN 0028-8667 New Zealand Science Review Vol 73 (3–4) 2016 Official Journal of the New Zealand Association of Scientists P O Box 1874, Wellington www.scientists.org.nz A forum for the exchange of views on science and science policy Managing Editor: Allen Petrey Contents Guest Editor: Daniel Leduc Production Editor: Geoff Gregory Editorial .....................................................................................................................................................61 Proceedings of a Symposium on Systematics and Biodiversity: Past, Present and Future, National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, April 2016 Bryozoa—not a minor phylum – Dennis P. Gordon and Mark J. Costello ..................................................63 The contribution of Dennis P. Gordon to the understanding of New Zealand Bryozoa – Abigail M Smith, Philip Bock and Peter Batson ................................................................................67 The study of taxonomy and systematics enhances ecological and conservation science – Ashley A. Rowden ............................................................................................................................72 Taxonomic research, collections and associated databases – and the changing science scene in New Zealand – Wendy Nelson .............................................................................79
    [Show full text]
  • Redescriptions of Nuisiana Arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea Reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae)
    Zootaxa 2739: 41–50 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Reuniting males and females: redescriptions of Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Araneae: Desidae, Stiphidiidae) COR J. VINK1,2,5, BRIAN M. FITZGERALD3, PHIL J. SIRVID3 & NADINE DUPÉRRÉ4 1Biosecurity Group, AgResearch, Private Bag 4749, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected] 2Entomology Research Museum, PO Box 84, Lincoln University, Lincoln 7647, New Zealand. 3Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa, PO Box 467, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 4Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York New York 10024, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 5Corresponding author Abstract Two New Zealand endemic spider species, Nuisiana arboris (Marples 1959) (Desidae) and Cambridgea reinga Forster & Wilton 1973 (Stiphidiidae), are redescribed, including notes on their distribution and DNA sequences from the mitochon- drial gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1. Based on morphological evidence and mitochondrial DNA sequences, Mata- chia magna Forster 1970 is a junior synonym of Nuisiana arboris, and Nanocambridgea grandis Blest & Vink 2000 is a junior synonym of Cambridgea reinga. Two forms of male morph in C. reinga are recorded. Key words: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI), DNA, Matachia, new synonymy, New Zealand, Nanocambridgea Introduction New Zealand’s spider fauna is diverse with an estimated 1990 species, of which 93% are endemic (Paquin et al. 2010). Most of the 1126 named species were described during the last 60 years and about 60% were described by one man, Ray Forster (Patrick et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Higher-Level Phylogenetics of Linyphiid Spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae) Based on Morphological and Molecular Evidence
    Cladistics Cladistics 25 (2009) 231–262 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2009.00249.x Higher-level phylogenetics of linyphiid spiders (Araneae, Linyphiidae) based on morphological and molecular evidence Miquel A. Arnedoa,*, Gustavo Hormigab and Nikolaj Scharff c aDepartament Biologia Animal, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Diagonal 645, E-8028 Barcelona, Spain; bDepartment of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA; cDepartment of Entomology, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark Accepted 19 November 2008 Abstract This study infers the higher-level cladistic relationships of linyphiid spiders from five genes (mitochondrial CO1, 16S; nuclear 28S, 18S, histone H3) and morphological data. In total, the character matrix includes 47 taxa: 35 linyphiids representing the currently used subfamilies of Linyphiidae (Stemonyphantinae, Mynogleninae, Erigoninae, and Linyphiinae (Micronetini plus Linyphiini)) and 12 outgroup species representing nine araneoid families (Pimoidae, Theridiidae, Nesticidae, Synotaxidae, Cyatholipidae, Mysmenidae, Theridiosomatidae, Tetragnathidae, and Araneidae). The morphological characters include those used in recent studies of linyphiid phylogenetics, covering both genitalic and somatic morphology. Different sequence alignments and analytical methods produce different cladistic hypotheses. Lack of congruence among different analyses is, in part, due to the shifting placement of Labulla, Pityohyphantes,
    [Show full text]
  • First Records and Three New Species of the Family Symphytognathidae
    ZooKeys 1012: 21–53 (2021) A peer-reviewed open-access journal doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1012.57047 RESEARCH ARTICLE https://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research First records and three new species of the family Symphytognathidae (Arachnida, Araneae) from Thailand, and the circumscription of the genus Crassignatha Wunderlich, 1995 Francisco Andres Rivera-Quiroz1,2, Booppa Petcharad3, Jeremy A. Miller1 1 Department of Terrestrial Zoology, Understanding Evolution group, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Darwin- weg 2, 2333CR Leiden, the Netherlands 2 Institute for Biology Leiden (IBL), Leiden University, Sylviusweg 72, 2333BE Leiden, the Netherlands 3 Faculty of Science and Technology, Thammasat University, Rangsit, Pathum Thani, 12121 Thailand Corresponding author: Francisco Andres Rivera-Quiroz ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Dimitrov | Received 29 July 2020 | Accepted 30 September 2020 | Published 26 January 2021 http://zoobank.org/4B5ACAB0-5322-4893-BC53-B4A48F8DC20C Citation: Rivera-Quiroz FA, Petcharad B, Miller JA (2021) First records and three new species of the family Symphytognathidae (Arachnida, Araneae) from Thailand, and the circumscription of the genus Crassignatha Wunderlich, 1995. ZooKeys 1012: 21–53. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1012.57047 Abstract The family Symphytognathidae is reported from Thailand for the first time. Three new species: Anapistula choojaiae sp. nov., Crassignatha seeliam sp. nov., and Crassignatha seedam sp. nov. are described and illustrated. Distribution is expanded and additional morphological data are reported for Patu shiluensis Lin & Li, 2009. Specimens were collected in Thailand between July and August 2018. The newly described species were found in the north mountainous region of Chiang Mai, and Patu shiluensis was collected in the coastal region of Phuket.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Anti-Predator Devices of Spiders* Invaders Away Or Kill and Eat Them
    Bull. Br. arachnol. Soc. (1995) 10 (3), 81-96 81 A review of the anti-predator devices of spiders* invaders away or kill and eat them. The pirate spiders (Mimetidae) that have been studied feed almost J. L. Cloudsley-Thompson exclusively on other spiders, whilst certain Salticidae 10 Battishill Street, (Portia spp.) feed not only upon insects, but sometimes London Nl 1TE also on other jumping spiders, and even tackle large orb-weavers in their webs (see below). Several other Summary families and genera, including Archaeidae, Palpimanus (Palpimanidae), Argyrodes and Theridion (Theridiidae), The predators of spiders are mostly either about the and Chorizopes (Araneidae) contain species that include same size as their prey (arthropods) or much larger (vertebrates), against each of which different types of de- other spiders in their diet. Sexual cannibalism has been fence have evolved. Primary defences include anachoresis, reviewed by Elgar (1992). Other books in which the phenology, crypsis, protective resemblance and disguise, enemies of spiders are discussed include: Berland (1932), spines and warning coloration, mimicry (especially of ants), Bristowe (1958), Cloudsley-Thompson (1958, 1980), cocoons and retreats, barrier webs, web stabilimenta and Edmunds (1974), Gertsch (1949), Main (1976), Millot detritus, and communal webs. Secondary defences are flight, dropping to the ground, colour change and thanatosis, (1949), Preston-Mafham, R. & K. (1984), Savory (1928), web vibration, whirling and bouncing, autotomy, venoms Thomas (1953) and Wise (1993). (For earlier references, and defensive fluids, urticating setae, warning sounds and see Warburton, 1909). deimatic displays. The anti-predator adaptations of spiders The major predators of spiders fall into two cate- are extremely complex, and combinations of the devices gories: (a) those about the same size as their prey (mainly listed frequently occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Hundreds of Species of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Live in Illinois In
    Illinois A B aquatic sowbug Asellus sp. Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella AAqquuaattiicc mayfly A. adult Hexagenia sp.; B. nymph Isonychia sp. MMaaccrrooiinnvveerrtteebbrraatteess Photographs © Michael R. Jeffords northern clearwater crayfish Orconectes propinquus Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords ruby spot damselfly Hetaerina americana Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords aquatic snail Pleurocera acutum Photograph © Jochen Gerber,The Field Museum of Natural History predaceous diving beetle Dytiscus circumcinctus Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella monkeyface mussel Quadrula metanevra common skimmer dragonfly - nymph Libellula sp. Photograph © Kevin S. Cummings Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella water scavenger beetle Hydrochara sp. Photograph © Steve J.Taylor devil crayfish Cambarus diogenes A B Photograph © ChristopherTaylor dobsonfly Corydalus sp. A. larva; B. adult Photographs © Michael R. Jeffords common darner dragonfly - nymph Aeshna sp. Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella giant water bug Belostoma lutarium Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella aquatic worm Slavina appendiculata Photograph © Mark J. Wetzel water boatman Trichocorixa calva Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella aquatic mite Order Prostigmata Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords backswimmer Notonecta irrorata Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella leech - adult and young Class Hirudinea pygmy backswimmer Neoplea striola mosquito - larva Toxorhynchites sp. fishing spider Dolomedes sp. Photograph © William N. Roston Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella Photograph © Michael R. Jeffords Photograph © Paul P.Tinerella Species List Species are not shown in proportion to actual size. undreds of species of aquatic macroinvertebrates live in Illinois in a Kingdom Animalia Hvariety of habitats. Some of the habitats have flowing water while Phylum Annelida Class Clitellata Family Naididae aquatic worm Slavina appendiculata This poster was made possible by: others contain still water. In order to survive in water, these organisms Class Hirudinea leech must be able to breathe, find food, protect themselves, move and reproduce.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Native Bat, Reptile, Amphibian and Terrestrial Invertebrate Translocations in New Zealand
    Summary of native bat, reptile, amphibian and terrestrial invertebrate translocations in New Zealand SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 303 Summary of native bat, reptile, amphibian and terrestrial invertebrate translocations in New Zealand G.H. Sherley, I.A.N. Stringer and G.R. Parrish SCIENCE FOR CONSERVATION 303 Published by Publishing Team Department of Conservation PO Box 10420, The Terrace Wellington 6143, New Zealand Cover: Male Mercury Islands tusked weta, Motuweta isolata. Originally found on Atiu or Middle Island in the Mercury Islands, these were translocated onto six other nearby islands after being bred in captivity. Photo: Ian Stringer. Science for Conservation is a scientific monograph series presenting research funded by New Zealand Department of Conservation (DOC). Manuscripts are internally and externally peer-reviewed; resulting publications are considered part of the formal international scientific literature. Individual copies are printed, and are also available from the departmental website in pdf form. Titles are listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science & technical. © Copyright April 2010, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1173–2946 (hardcopy) ISSN 1177–9241 (PDF) ISBN 978–0–478–14771–1 (hardcopy) ISBN 978–0–478–14772–8 (PDF) This report was prepared for publication by the Publishing Team; editing by Amanda Todd and layout by Hannah Soult. Publication was approved by the General Manager, Research and Development Group, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Methods 7 3.
    [Show full text]
  • A Protocol for Online Documentation of Spider Biodiversity Inventories Applied to a Mexican Tropical Wet Forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae)
    Zootaxa 4722 (3): 241–269 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4722.3.2 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:6AC6E70B-6E6A-4D46-9C8A-2260B929E471 A protocol for online documentation of spider biodiversity inventories applied to a Mexican tropical wet forest (Araneae, Araneomorphae) FERNANDO ÁLVAREZ-PADILLA1, 2, M. ANTONIO GALÁN-SÁNCHEZ1 & F. JAVIER SALGUEIRO- SEPÚLVEDA1 1Laboratorio de Aracnología, Facultad de Ciencias, Departamento de Biología Comparada, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Colonia Copilco el Bajo. C. P. 04510. Del. Coyoacán, Ciudad de México, México. E-mail: [email protected] 2Corresponding author Abstract Spider community inventories have relatively well-established standardized collecting protocols. Such protocols set rules for the orderly acquisition of samples to estimate community parameters and to establish comparisons between areas. These methods have been tested worldwide, providing useful data for inventory planning and optimal sampling allocation efforts. The taxonomic counterpart of biodiversity inventories has received considerably less attention. Species lists and their relative abundances are the only link between the community parameters resulting from a biotic inventory and the biology of the species that live there. However, this connection is lost or speculative at best for species only partially identified (e. g., to genus but not to species). This link is particularly important for diverse tropical regions were many taxa are undescribed or little known such as spiders. One approach to this problem has been the development of biodiversity inventory websites that document the morphology of the species with digital images organized as standard views.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary List of Fossil Spiders
    A summary list of fossil spiders compiled by Jason A. Dunlop (Berlin), David Penney (Manchester) & Denise Jekel (Berlin) Suggested citation: Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2010. A summary list of fossil spiders. In Platnick, N. I. (ed.) The world spider catalog, version 10.5. American Museum of Natural History, online at http://research.amnh.org/entomology/spiders/catalog/index.html Last udated: 10.12.2009 INTRODUCTION Fossil spiders have not been fully cataloged since Bonnet’s Bibliographia Araneorum and are not included in the current Catalog. Since Bonnet’s time there has been considerable progress in our understanding of the spider fossil record and numerous new taxa have been described. As part of a larger project to catalog the diversity of fossil arachnids and their relatives, our aim here is to offer a summary list of the known fossil spiders in their current systematic position; as a first step towards the eventual goal of combining fossil and Recent data within a single arachnological resource. To integrate our data as smoothly as possible with standards used for living spiders, our list follows the names and sequence of families adopted in the Catalog. For this reason some of the family groupings proposed in Wunderlich’s (2004, 2008) monographs of amber and copal spiders are not reflected here, and we encourage the reader to consult these studies for details and alternative opinions. Extinct families have been inserted in the position which we hope best reflects their probable affinities. Genus and species names were compiled from established lists and cross-referenced against the primary literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications from the Mammal Society ± No. 77
    J. Zool., Lond. (1998) 246, 443±486 # 1998 The Zoological Society of London Printed in the United Kingdom Communications from the Mammal Society ± No. 77 Edited by M. L. Gorman J. Zool., Lond. (1998) 246, 443±445 # 1998 The Zoological Society of London DNA ®ngerprinting reveals high levels of genetic diversity within British populations of the introduced non-native grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) Z. K. David-Gray 1*, J. Gurnell2 and D. M. Hunt3 1 Department of Biology, Imperial College, University of London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BB, U.K. 2 School of Biological Sciences, Queen Mary and West®eld College, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, U.K. 3 Department of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, U.K. INTRODUCTION genetic diversity as a result of recent population bottle- necks. We have used DNA ®ngerprinting (Jeffreys, In general, if populations are founded by very small Wilson & Thein, 1985a), a technique which provides a numbers of individuals, low levels of genetic diversity good indication of genome variability (Jeffreys et al., amongst subsequent generations known as founder 1985b; Kuhnlein et al., 1990; Kunieda et al., 1993) to effects, can be predicted to occur as a result of genetic assess overall levels of genetic diversity in two British drift (Franklin, 1980; Lacy, 1997). A loss of genetic grey squirrel populations; Alice Holt Forest on the variation has been reported in several species that have borders of Hampshire and Surrey in southern England experienced genetic bottlenecks because of habitat and Thetford Forest in East Anglia.
    [Show full text]