Appendices Barton Springs/Edwards
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DRAFT HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN AND PRELIMINARY DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STUDY Volume Two - Appendices Prepared By Barton Springs/Edwards Aquifer Conservation District For U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service August 2007 APPENDIX A Participating Individuals and Organizations Appendix A Appendix A Participating Individuals and Organizations A.1 Citizens Advisory Committee The passage of Senate Bill 1272 during the 76th Texas Legislature in 1999 requires the District to appoint a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) to assist in preparing the regional HCP. The purpose of the CAC is to advise the District in development of the HCP, assist in determination of the scope of the HCP, recommend mitigation measures and other HCP conditions, provide a forum for public discourse and conflict reconciliation, help meet public disclosure requirements, oversee HCP progress and development, and most importantly, build consensus among diverse organizations and interests. Accordingly, the CAC was appointed by the District in a manner to assure representation by all affected interests in the Edwards Aquifer region. Participants include private landowners, irrigators, water purveyors, conservation and environmental organizations, private consultants, representatives from major cities, federal, state, and local governmental agencies, and universities. Members of the Citizens Advisory Committee as of July 2007 are listed in Table A-1, below. A.2 Biological Advisory Team The passage of Senate Bill 1272 (referenced above) also requires that the District, together with the Texas Parks and Wildlife Commission and landowner members of the Citizens Advisory Committee [CAC], appoint a Biological Advisory Team [BAT], at least one member of which shall be appointed by the Commission and one member by the landowner members of the Citizens Advisory Committee. The member appointed by the Commission serves as presiding officer of the team. The team shall assist in the calculation of harm to the endangered species and the sizing and configuring of habitat preserves, as needed. The District has appointed a seven-member committee to fulfill this function. Members of the Biological Advisory Team are listed in Table A-1. Draft A-1 08/2007 Appendix A Table A-1. Citizens Advisory Committee and Biological Advisory Team (July 2007) First Last Phone E-mail Sarah Baker [email protected] Jon Beall 512-454-8090 [email protected] Valerie Bristol 512-494 9559 x5 [email protected] Jim Camp 512 431-1120 [email protected] Jeff Goldman [email protected] Ryan Mattox [email protected] Sharon Michaelis 512-268-2241 N/A John Mikels 512-445-3433 [email protected] Scott & Gini Nester 512-295-5811 [email protected] John Noell 512-347-0040 x105 [email protected] John Orr 512-262-2099 [email protected] Bill Russell 512-940-8336 [email protected] Diane Senterfit 512-487-4014 [email protected] Joe Vickers 512-894-4424 [email protected] Carl Urban [email protected] Jennifer Walker 512-477-1729 [email protected] Geoff Weisbart 512-487-4012 [email protected] Ira Yates 512-292-6197 [email protected] Designated Governmental Representatives (ex-officio) Andrew Backus 512-913-3156 [email protected] Charles Laws 512-243-2113 [email protected] Nancy McClintock 512-974-2652 [email protected] David Meesey 512-936-0852 [email protected] Cat Quintanilla 512-892-1383 [email protected] Matt Wagner (512) 389-4778 [email protected] Will Amy 512-289-4800 [email protected] Dawn Whitehead 512-289-4800 [email protected] Terry Tull 512-858-2148 [email protected] Todd Votteler 830-379-5822 [email protected] Nora Mullarkey [email protected] Biological Advisory Team Bryan Brooks 254-710-6553 [email protected] Robert Hansen 512-482-0527 [email protected] David Hillis 512- 471-5792 [email protected] Lisa O’Donnell 512-974-2204 lisa.o’[email protected] Andrew Price 512-912-7022 [email protected] Walter Rast 512-245-3554 [email protected] John Sharp 512-471-3317 [email protected] Draft A-2 08/2007 APPENDIX B Characterization of HCP/EIS Alternative Measures Used in Impact Assessment Appendix B Appendix B Characterization of HCP/EIS Alternative Measures Used in Impact Assessment Overall Feasibility (F) and Activities Likely after ITP Effectiveness Issuance (E) Notes on Success Metric(s), Activities Likely Performed before (Time-phased Adaptive Prerequisite Needs Before/After Outcomes, and/or Alternative HCP Measures and Included in ITP Application Management) or Constraints ITP Issuance Assumptions 1.0 MEASURES UNDERTAKEN DURING All CONDITIONS 1.1 Establish and District Board will establish a As statutory or regulatory Proposed Rule: Section 3- F: High/Very EDWL is implemented by Implement a Permitting program of EDWL on pumping authorities change or every 1.23. The EDWL for the High District Rules before ITP Program in the District to Edwards groundwater; five years, whichever is Barton Springs Segment of E: Very High/ issuance. Maintain and Improve an Board will establish more rigorous earlier, review and revise the Edwards Aquifer Very High Groundwater Management EDWL (“Aquifer Cap”)2. measures for the conditional the specified EDWL as Proposed Rule: Section 3- Plan containing EDWL is permitting program; needed, to maintain or 1.6. District Action on approved by TWDB within Board will incorporate EDWL in improve effectiveness of Permits A. Permits. (9). The one year of ITP issuance, and Groundwater Management Plan, pumpage reductions during approved UDCP for the well every five years thereafter. which will be submitted to TWDB droughts. yields a maximum volume of Authorized Edwards Aquifer for approval. By 2010: The adoption of authorized groundwater pumpage in aggregate less “Desired Future production that does not than cap (individual permits Conditions,” as required by exceed the EDWL specified wouldn’t be adjusted in the TWDB, are set for the in Section 3-1.23 of District Alternative 2, as this is not state-designated Rules. currently legal), “Groundwater Manage- ment Area,” so that MAG incorporates the EDWL. Note: The EDWL program is to be implemented by rules and regulations applicable to various drought and non- drought stages and other conditions, as noted throughout this table Draft B-1 08/2007 Appendix B Overall Feasibility (F) and Activities Likely after ITP Effectiveness Issuance (E) Notes on Success Metric(s), Activities Likely Performed before (Time-phased Adaptive Prerequisite Needs Before/After Outcomes, and/or Alternative HCP Measures and Included in ITP Application Management) or Constraints ITP Issuance Assumptions 1.2 Ongoing/Continuing Demand Reduction Measures 1.2.1 Implement a new Before ITP Issuance: Relate Within First Year of ITP See: Texas Water Code, F: High/High At least 50 exempt wells and database of registered wells census tract data and/or COA Permit: Confirm or modify Chp. 36, “Groundwater E: High/High their data will be entered into that contains estimates of estimates of population, “Living estimated withdrawals by Conservation Districts,” and the new database within 2 groundwater withdrawal for a Unit Equivalents,” and aggregating results of well- TWDB Rules, TAC Sec. years of date of ITP issuance. subset of exempt (i.e., non- number/location of exempt wells; by-well assessments. 356.5, “Groundwater At least 150 exempt wells and permitted) wells to better District Board will authorize a new Board authorizes a new Management.” their data will be entered into gauge location and amount of database of registered wells that well registration process Depends on voluntary the new database within 5 pumpage from all exempt includes geographically that requires exempt cooperation of exempt well years of date of ITP issuance. wells2. representative subsets of exempt owners to identify current owners. well owners who voluntarily uses and number of users. characterize current uses of groundwater, and number of customers or persons using groundwater, and rates of withdrawal for each well. 1.2.2 Institute a new, Purchase inventory of meters to Within First Year of ITP Note: This is a voluntary F: High/Low A budget commitment of at voluntary metering and water lend to exempt non-metered well Permit: Develop a Program, whereby District E: Low/Mod least $20,000 will be made in use monitoring program for users; reporting method, for use will seek cooperation from a the first year, and $10,000 in non-permitted (exempt) wells2. Educate all registered well owners by water supply providers, reasonable number of well each of the succeeding two about the program and the to report the water use of owners who are not years, not including in-kind benefits to them; their end-use customers currently metered. District labor, to cover the Provide small cash incentives to anonymously; Note: All nonexempt costs of equipment and small exempt users for temporary Establish use profiles for all (permitted) users and their cash incentives to obtain metering with District-owned groundwater users in the customers, as relevant, are cooperation of exempt, meters on representative sample District. already metered and report currently un-metered users to of exempt wells. District mandates monthly. participate in the assessment Provide cash incentives to others nonexempt “excessive District purchase inventory program. for temporary metering with users” must install meters of meters. At the end of five years from District-owned meters on and report monthly water Requires voluntary ITP issuance, the District will representative sample of exempts. use as do exempts. participation by otherwise produce a report on exempt compliant users, and and non-exempt domestic political will to ask. and public water supply use in the District, including estimates of total withdrawals, monthly/seasonal variations, Draft B-2 08/2007 Appendix B Overall Feasibility (F) and Activities Likely after ITP Effectiveness Issuance (E) Notes on Success Metric(s), Activities Likely Performed before (Time-phased Adaptive Prerequisite Needs Before/After Outcomes, and/or Alternative HCP Measures and Included in ITP Application Management) or Constraints ITP Issuance Assumptions and geographic area variations.