Full Beacher
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Finding of No Significant Impact Double Track NWI Project
Finding of No Significant Impact for the Double Track NWI Project Gary to Michigan City, Indiana prepared by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration and the Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District pursuant to: National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 USC § 4332) and Section 4(f) of the United States Department of Transportation Act of 1966 (49 USC § 303) Double Track Northwest Indiana Project Finding of No Significant Impact November 1, 2018 Federal Transit Administration Region V DOUBLE TRACK NORTHWEST INDIANA PROJECT Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) Approved November 1, 2018 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document provides the basis for a determination by the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Transit Administration (FTA), of a Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the proposed Double Track Northwest Indiana (DT-NWI) Project. This determination is made in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA); 42 United States Code (USC) § 4331 et seq; FTA’s implementing procedures (23 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] § 771.121); Section 4(f) of the USDOT Act of 1966, 49 USC § 303; and the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA), 54 USC § 300101 et seq. As lead federal agency, FTA jointly prepared the Environmental Assessment (EA), Section 4(f) Evaluation, and Section 106 findings (of the NHPA) with the Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District (NICTD), as the local project sponsor. These documents describe potential adverse effects on the human and natural environment and the integrity of historic resources that may result from the proposed Project. The EA was prepared pursuant to 23 CFR § 771.119 and issued by FTA on September 21, 2017. -
AECOM RFP Proposal
#2020-014 Architecture and Engineering Services for the CHESTNUT STREET MULTIMODAL STATION & SHARED SERVICES FACILITY & CITY OF OXFORD PASSENGER RAIL PLATFORM Chicago Dyer RensselaerTECHNICAL PROPOSAL Lafayette Crawfordsville Oxford Washington Indianapolis Connersville Clifton Ashland Forge Cincinnati Alderson Culpepper Marysville Charlottesville Huntington White Staunton October 19, 2020 Sulpher Chaleston Springs Submitted to: Submitted by: Buttler County Regional AECOM Services of Thurmond Transit Authority Ohio, Inc. 3045 Moser Court, 525 Vine Street, Hamilton, OH 45011 Suite 1800 Cincinnati, OH 45202 01 RFP Cover Page 01 RFP Cover Page AECOM 513.651.3440 tel 525 Vine Street 877.660.7727 fax Suite 1800 Cincinnati, OH 45202 www.aecom.com October 19, 2020 Procurement Department Butler County RTA 3045 Moser Court Hamilton, OH 45011 RE: #2020-014 Architecture and Engineering Services for the Chestnut Street Multimodal Station and Shared Services Facility and City of Oxford Passenger Rail Platform Dear Selection Committee, Creating the Chestnut Street Facility and Passenger Rail Platform is a once in a lifetime opportunity for Butler County, the City of Oxford, and all of your community stakeholders to realize a best-in-class gateway to your community. The importance of getting this project right is paramount and we are grateful for the opportunity to submit AECOM’s qualifications to you. As the premier transportation firm in the nation, ranked #1 in Transportation in Engineering News-Record’s 2020 “Top 500 Design Firms”, we know that we have above and beyond what it takes to bring your vision to life. BCRTA wishes to create a welcoming multimodal transit facility connecting BCRTA routes serving Oxford and the University with interurban buses, passenger rail, and bicyclist and commuter students to help your riders get where they need to go in their daily lives. -
Local Planning and High-Speed Rail: Responses and Perceptions in a Developing Amtrak Corridor
Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-2014 Local Planning and High-Speed Rail: Responses and Perceptions in a Developing Amtrak Corridor John-Luke D'Ambrosio Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Geographic Information Sciences Commons, Human Geography Commons, and the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Recommended Citation D'Ambrosio, John-Luke, "Local Planning and High-Speed Rail: Responses and Perceptions in a Developing Amtrak Corridor" (2014). Master's Theses. 542. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/542 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOCAL PLANNING AND HIGH-SPEED RAIL: RESPONSES AND PERCEPTIONS IN A DEVELOPING AMTRAK CORRIDOR by John-Luke D’Ambrosio A thesis submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Geography Western Michigan University December 2014 Thesis Committee: C. Scott Smith, Ph.D., Chair Benjamin Ofori-Amoah, Ph.D. David Lemberg, Ph.D. LOCAL PLANNING AND HIGH-SPEED RAIL: RESPONSES AND PERCEPTIONS IN A DEVELOPING AMTRAK CORRIDOR John-Luke D’Ambrosio, M.A. Western Michigan University, 2014 Incremental speed increases have been a main focus of Amtrak in recent years. Now operating at 110 mph within three different service lines in the United States, Amtrak is making progress toward achieving maximum speeds within rail corridors. -
Draft Historic Property Report for the NICTD Double Track NWI Project, Michigan City to Gary, Indiana
Draft Historic Property Report for the NICTD Double Track NWI Project, Michigan City to Gary, Indiana Segment 1 of 3, LaPorte County LaPorteCounty,IN DHPANo.19318 March 30, 2017 Draft Historic Property Report for the NICTD Double Track NWI Project; Segment 1 of 3, LaPorte County PREPARED FOR Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District 33 E. U.S. Highway 12 Chesterton, IN 46304 PREPARED BY 2600 Park Tower Suite 100 Vienna, VA 22180-7342 AUTHORS Diana Garnett Jeanne Barnes March 30, 2017 Draft Historic Property Report for the NICTD Double Track NWI Project; Segment 1 of 3, LaPorte County Table of Contents 1.0 ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 2 2.2 Setting ........................................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Area of Potential Effects ................................................................................................................ 3 2.4 Survey Personnel .......................................................................................................................... 4 3.0 LITERATURE REVIEW ................................................................................................................. -
Michigan City Reside in Its People and Their Passion for Creativity and Fun
1.800.634.2650 1 The heart and soul of Michigan City reside in its people and their passion for creativity and fun. Artisans, makers, and craftsmen have set sail for Michigan City’s free-spirited culture, creating a melting pot of eclectic boutiques, art galleries, street festivals, great food, fresh brews, live music, and a vibrant nightlife. Let your adventure begin at the Indiana Dunes National Park and explore the singing sand beaches and hiking trails on the shoreline of Lake Michigan. Whether you are looking for a relaxing beach town vacation or ready to shop and explore, Michigan City is your destination. Visit MyMichiganCity.com 2 www.VisitMichiganCityLaPorte.com Located just minutes from the breathtaking Lake Michigan shoreline, the Country Inn & Suites Michigan City Hotel offers a relaxing atmosphere to ensure a stress-free stay for business and leisure travelers alike. During your stay at our Michigan City hotel near Lake Michigan, enjoy a complimentary hot breakfast, cozy lobby fireplace and spacious hotel rooms. Our smoke free Michigan City hotel is conveniently located near many of the region’s best attractions and offers a number of on-site services and amenities to make your stay enjoyable. Be our guest at Country Inn & Suites and see what sets us apart from other Michigan City hotels. Newly renovated Country Inn & Suites, Michigan City I-94 & Hwy 421, exit 34B 3805 N. Frontage Road, Michigan City 46360 (219) 879-3600 • Reservations: (800) 456-4000 ® I-94 & Hwy 421, Exit 34B 3801 N. Frontage Road Michigan City, IN 46360 -
Environmental Assessment and Section 4(F) Evaluation
Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation NICTD Double Track NWI (DT-NWI) Milepost (MP) 58.8 to MP 32.2 Gary to Michigan City, IN September 18, 2017 This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SECTION 4(F) EVALUATION Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation District (NICTD) Double Track NWI Project (DT-NWI) Lake, Porter, and LaPorte Counties, Indiana Prepared for: Prepared by: September 18, 2017 This page intentionally left blank. NICTD DT-NWI MP 58.8 to MP 32.2 Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation Table of Contents Acronyms .................................................................................................................................................... ix Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 ES.1 Background ................................................................................................................................... 1 ES.2 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 1 ES.3 Alternatives Considered ................................................................................................................ 1 ES.4 Environmental Impacts and Measures to Avoid or Minimize Harm .............................................. 3 ES.5 Public Input Requested ................................................................................................................