Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for Development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder Routes and Coastal Roads to improve the efficiency of freight movement in (Lot-3/ & Jharkhand/Package-2)

Application for Environmental Clearance (EC) of Odisha State, Length- 240.110 Km Pre-Feasibility Report

September 2019

YONGMA Engineering Co. Ltd. JV With Arkitechno Consultants(I) Pvt.Ltd. 301-302 Times Centre, Golf Course Road,Sector-54 Gurgaon, Haryana Phone:0124-4746202, Fax: 0124-4742955, Mob: 9818186242, email: [email protected],email:[email protected] Web:www.ymeng.in,www.arkitechno.com Pre-feasibility Report

CHAPTER-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Road projects are meant for improving the quality of life of people and developing the country’s economy. Along with all positive impacts of the road projects, there may also be some significant detrimental impact on nearby communities and environment. To account for adverse impacts, environmental impact assessment is utmost necessary. These concerns for environmental issue in road projects have also become a part of legal requirements and requirements for obtaining financial support. Therefore Environmental Assessmentis of prime importance in road projects.

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has been entrusted with the assignment of Development of Economic Corridors, Inter-corridors and feeder routes and Coastal road primarily to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojna Lot-3/Odisha & Jharkhand/Package-2 having length of proposed alignment 463.465km (which is totally green field) which starts from near Abhanpur (ch. 0.000)/ch. 61.600 of proposed -Durg Bypass and ends at Vishakhapatnam bypass(ch.463.465) of Existing section of SH-38.

The whole length of road is divided into 3 phases, i.e., phase-1 for State, phase-2 for Odisha State and phase-3 for Andhra Pradesh State. This Pre- feasibility report is for phase-2 i.e. from Ch.123.210 to Ch.363.320, Length- 240.110 Km in Odisha State.

The phase-2 of this proposed project shall connect Dhanara village in District to Tumbigura in district & various other parts of Odisha.

NHAI as the employer and the executing agency has commissioned the services of M/s.YONGMA Engineering Co. Ltd. JV With Arkitechno Consultants (I) Pvt. Ltd. with its Office at Gurgaon in Haryana State for carrying out the work of Consultancy Services for preparation of DPR for development of Economic Corridors, Inter Corridors, Feeder Routes and Coastal Roads to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India (Lot-3/Odisha & Jharkhand/Package-2).

II. STATUTORY CLEARNCES:

FOREST CLEARANCES: Since 507.53 ha of forest land (Reserve & Revenue Forest) are involved in construction of this corridor so Forest Clearance is a must and to be obtained from MoEF&CC.

R&R CLEARANCE: The road is passing through a 129 nos. of villages (70 nos. in Nabrangpur district + 59 nos. in ). The R&R plan according to LARR Act 2013 will be prepared after completion of Social Impact assessment (SIA) study. These plans will be approved by respective state governments.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 1 Pre-feasibility Report

FINANCE CONCURRANCE: The central Government will consider budgetary support after completions of the statutory requirements.

ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE: As per MoEF&CC EIA notification, 2006, the proposed project is covered under category 7 ‘f’. As per the statutory requirements, the competent authority adheres to submit the Environmental Impact Assessment Report to MoEF&CC, Delhi in order to obtain EnvironmentalClearance.

III. PROJECT COST AND BENEFITS:

PROJECT COST: The estimated cost of the project is about INR 8092.4 Crores. Detailed cost break-up and Project schedule shall be discussed in the EIA report.

PROJECT BENEFITS: The benefits of the Project are multi-fold. It will substantially reduce the travel time and the other remote areas falling on the alignment. In addition to the improved connectivity, it will also provide a boost to the economic status of the villages / towns falling in the dedicated Project area.

Overall improvement will be expected in local area in terms of:

 Better connectivity to economic, social and political hubs of Odisha.

 Fast and safe connectivity resulting in savings in fuel, travel time and total transportation cost.

 Better approach to medical & educationalservices.

 Faster transportation of perishable goods like fruits, vegetables, dairyproducts and marketing of agricultural products.

 Development of local agriculture andhandicrafts.

 Opening up of opportunities for new occupations and trade on theroute.

 Indirect and direct employment opportunity to people from all skilled, semi- skilled and unskilled streams.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 2 Pre-feasibility Report

CHAPTER-2 INTRODUCTION OF PROJECT /BACKGROUND INFORMATION

2.1 IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT AND PROJECTPROPONENT:

IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT: The proposed project pertains to Development of Economic Corridors, Inter- corridors and feeder routes and Coastal road primarily to improve the efficiency of freight movement in India under Bharatmala Pariyojna Lot-3/Odisha & Jharkhand/Package-2 having length of proposed alignment 463.465 km (which is totally green field) which starts from near Abhanpur (ch. 0.000)/ch. 61.600 of proposed Raipur-Durg Bypass and ends at bypass (ch.463.465 km) of Existing section of SH-38.

The Phase 2 of the proposed project shall connect Dhanara village in to Tumbigura in Koraput district and various other parts of Odisha. As per MoEF&CC EIA notification, 2006, the proposed project is covered under category 7 ‘f’.

PROJECTPROPONENT: National Highways Authority of India (NHAI), an autonomous agency of the Government of India, is responsible for management of a network of national highways across the country. It is a nodal agency of the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRT&H), Government of India. Its vision is to meet the nation’s need for the provision and maintenance of national highways network to global standards and to meet user expectations in the most time-bound and cost-effective manner, within the strategic policy framework set by the Government of India and thus promoting economic well- being and quality of life of the people. NHAI shall be the nodal authority/proponent for the development of this Project.

2.2 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NATURE OF THEPROJECT: The Phase 2 of the proposed economic corridor passes through Nabarangpur & Koraput district. Salient features of the Project are as follows.

Table No. C2-1: Project Salient Features

Sl. Particular Details No. Phase-2 of Development of Economic 1. Project Name corridors, Inter-Corridors, Feeder routes and coastal road primarily to improve freight movement in the country,Lot- 3/Odisha & Jharkhand/Package- 2.Length–240.110 Km. 2. Nature of Project Highway Project

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 3 Pre-feasibility Report

3. Location of project stretch The proposed economic corridor passes through Dhanara village in Nabarangpur District to Tumbigura in Koraput district in Odisha. 4. Geographical Coordinates Starting Point: 20°01'37.21"N 81°52'04.29"E End Point: 18°29'23.95"N 83°05'54.77"E 5. Land details Agricultural land with patches of settlements 6. Land use details 1689.97 ha (Including Forest Area) 7. Man power 2000 8. Electric power Requirement 1000 kVA which shall be managed from State ElectricityBoards. 9. Nearest railway station Koraput Railway Station, 6.5km (approx.) in East direction (Ch.185.00 km). 10. NearestState Highway/ The proposed project is itself a National National Highway Highway. 11. Nearest Airport Raipur Airport, 125km from starting point. 12. Seismic zone Zone II

2.3 Need of the Project and Its Importance to the Country of Region: The existing direct route between the two points i.e. Visakhapatnam and Abhanpur which is not only long but also experiences heavy traffic during peak hours. Thus, the Phase-1 of this proposed project is to create a hassle free road within the state of Odisha.

The proposed route shall thus enhance the opportunity of transport and communication within the state of Odishaby saving both time and fuel.

The Project will further have following benefits at national and regional level:

 High-speed connectivity and access: The proposed economic corridor will avoid traffic congestion and speed-up the freightmovement.

 Aiding economic growth: The seamless connectivity will provide better access to vehicles as a link to the National Highways. The Project will reduce travel time and provide boost to trade and commerce linked to the regions connected through this economiccorridor.

 Growth of backward areas: The biggest strength of the alignment is that it plans to cover backward districts of Odisha. As a result of connectivity and access to other parts of the country, these backward areas will be aided to integrate with rest of the world. Further, freight and passenger traffic on the economic corridor will help promoting ancillary economy of theseregions.

 Decongestion of existing National and State Highways: The proposed phase will take away traffic pressures from existing SH and NH passing

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 4 Pre-feasibility Report

through various cities thereby leaving the NH and SH for regional and local usage.

 Improved safety: Due to access control, the Roadway & Travel Safety of the traffic connecting the cities will be enhanced as there will be minimum distractions & conflictzones.

 Support to industry: Different types of industries like Manufacturing, Tourism etc. along the proposed corridor will be facilitated in their business operation andreach ability.

2.4 Employment Generation (Direct and Indirect) The proposed project shall generate andirect employment opportunity to about 2000 persons. It shall also generate additional employment opportunities in form of transportation of construction materials, greenbelt development and implementation of EMP.

During operations phase, the Project will largely have indirect employment benefits in form of highway amenities and through economic & social hubs developed around the Economic Corridor. Efficient reach and connectivity to distant markets will further enhance economy of the districts and create employmentopportunities.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 5 Pre-feasibility Report

CHAPTER-3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

3.1 Type of the Project including Interlinked and Interdependent Projects, if any

Out of 44 economic corridors 9 economic corridors planned under the Union government’s ambitious Bharatmala scheme will be linked through expressways. The alignments of economic corridors“Raipur-Vishakhapatnam”are completely access control and will considerably intends to facilitate seamless trade by reducing the distance between connecting cities, saving cost, time, fuel and carbon emissions.

The MoRT&H & NHAI has decided the proposed economic corridor alignment shall be as Crow fly line from Raipur to Visakhapatnam.The obligatory point of the section is due to major industries NALCO &HAL.In many disciplines a Greenfield project is one that lacks constraints imposed by prior work. The analogy is to that of construction on Greenfield land where there is no need to work within the constraints of existing buildings or infrastructure.

Economic corridors are meant to attract investment and generate economic activities within a contiguous region, on the foundation of an efficient transportation system. The Existing travel time from Raipur-Visakhapatnam is 14.00hours via Dhamtari, , Jagdalpur, , , Koraput, Sunabeda, & (Avg. riding speed 40kmph),Length- 593Km.Proposed alignment (Option-3B,design Speed 100Kmph for Plain/Rolling & Hilly terrain) of Economic corridor travel time will be 7.0hours via Kundei, Raighar, , Nawrangpur, Borigumma, Koraput, Sunabeda in Odisha state (Avg. riding speed 70 kmph), Length-463 Km Savings in length 130 km and in travel time is 7 hours. Vehicle operation cost (fuel, drivers, maintenance etc.) will efficiently improved due to smooth and signal free alignment. Safety of vehicles operating on EC will be improved due to advanced traffic management system, lighting arrangements and other safety arrangement. The PROW is taken as 70m in Plain & Rolling Terrain of this corridor.

3.2 Project Location The length proposed for the phase-2stretch measures 240.110 Km and start at Dhanara village (Nabarangpur District) and terminates at Tumbigura village (Koraput district) in the state ofOdisha.

This phase of the Raipur-Vishakhapatnam economic corridor alignment starts at Dhanara village near Nabarangpur district and terminates at Tumbigura village near Koraput districtin Odisha.

Table No. C3-1: Project Coordinates

Sl. No. Coordinates Starting point 21°05'18.93"N 81°45'01.55”E End Point 17°48'13.96"N 83°08'38.22”E

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 6 Pre-feasibility Report

3.3 Details of Alternative Sites to be considered and basis of selection of proposedsite

Four alignment options were considered in order to finalize the proposed alignment. Both the alignments were compared and the final alignment has been selected after prior analysis on basis of minimum tree felling, minimum exorbitant cost, comparatively lower land degradation and lesser environmental impacts. The detailed alternative analysis is enclosed as Annexure-2.

The Project areas were studied in details and the existing road networks were analyzed to identify possible alternate alignments between the start and end points. Four different alignments have been identified in the project which also includes the alignment proposed earlier. The alternative alignments are given in Table No. C3-2 & Table No. C3-3:

Option-1(Brown & Green Field): Length-250 Km

In Odisha state, the alignment crosses the villages/town Kundei, Raighar, Umerkote, Dabugaon, Papdahandi, Nawrangpur, Borigumma, Koraput, Sunabeda, Semiliguda, Pottangi following existing road with provision of by pass for urban/village area considering design speed 50Kmph to 100Kmph in hilly terrain & permissible hill cutting.The option-1 has not been recommended due to less design speed & length is more.

Option-2(Green Field): Length-230Km In OD state, a Crow fly alignment was considered in continuation from CG border, the alignment follows Kundei, Raighar, Umarkote, Nawrangpur, Semiliguda & ends near village to reduce the project length considering tunnel provision of length-4.910Km, via-duct provision of length-2.920Km, design speed 50Kmph to 100Kmph with smooth gradient in hilly terrain& permissible hill cutting. Due to Crow fly alignment in CG state shifted 48km towards west, it was not feasible to follow the Crow fly alignment of OD state. The option-2 has not been recommended due to the alignment passes through less design speed & length is more.

Option-3A (Green Field): Length-253Km In Odisha state, the alignment follows Kundei, Raighar, Umerkote, Nawrangpur & Semiliguda. The project length considering tunnel provision of length-4.9Km, design speed 100Kmph& permissible hill cutting. The option-3A has not been recommended due to the project length & cost is more.

Option-3B(Green Field): Length-239.050Km In Odisha state, the alignment follows Dhanara, Murtama, Nandapara, Talbera, Karki, Pujarigura, Sandubull, Chhaagan, Kunduli, Pikali, Tumbigura, The project length considering tunnel provision of length-5.7Km, design speed 100Kmph with smooth gradient in hilly terrain & permissible hill cutting. The option-3B has been recommended due to less length & cost.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 7 Pre-feasibility Report

Table No. C3-2: Detailed Alternative Analysis Option-1 Option-2 Option-3A Option-3B Sl Description (Brown & (Green (Green (Green No Green Field) Field) Field) Field) Total Design 1 250 230 253 240.110 Length(Km) 2 Plain Terrain(Km) 111.2 99.7 124.67 109.6 3 Hilly Terrain(Km) 139.2 130.6 128.4 130.6 4 Brown Field 139.0 - - - 5 Green Field 111.3 230.3 253.1 240.110 Wild life Sanctuary 6 - - - Length(Km) 7 RF/PF Length(Km) 17.2 51.6 15.7 18.9 8 Land Required(Hacter) 1503.3 1611.8 1771.8 936.4 9 Land Cost(Cr.) 1587.7 1263.6 1389.1 749.1 10 R&R Cost(Cr.) 180.2 64.9 67.4 45.2 11 Utility Cost(Cr.) 114.7 64.9 67.4 36.0 12 Tunnel Length(Km) 5.7 4.9 5.7 13 Tunnel Cost(Cr.) 1425.0 1227.5 1425.0 14 Viaduct Length(Km) - 3.9 3.9 15 Viaduct Cost(Cr.) - 975.0 975.0 16 Total Civil Cost (Cr.) 4931.6 6493.5 6741.3 4518.0 17 Per Km Civil Cost(Cr.) 19.7 28.2 26.6 18.8 Total Project Cost 18 6699.5 7822.1 8197.8 8092.4 Including all (Cr.) Per Km Cost Including 19 26.8 34.0 32.4 33.7 All(Cr.) 50Kmph for 50Kmph for 100Kmph for 100Kmph for Hilly Terrain & Hilly Terrain & 20 Design Speed (Kmph) both Hilly & both Hilly & 100Kmph for 100Kmph for Plain Terrain Plain Terrain Plain Terrain Plain Terrain Achieved Riding Speed 21 50 70 70 70 (Kmph) 22 Travel Time(Hrs) 5.01 3.29 3.62 3.42 Project Length Project Length Design Speed Design Speed & Cost is more & Cost is less 23 Remarks is less in Hilly is less in Hilly than the than the Terrain Terrain Option-3B Option 3A Not Not Not 24 Recommendation Recommended Recommended Recommended Recommended

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 8 Pre-feasibility Report

Table No. C3-3: Comparison of Options 3A & 3B Sl Option-3A Option-3B Description No (Green Field) (Green Field) 1 Total Design Length(Km) 253 240.110 2 Plain Terrain(Km) 124.67 109.6 3 Hilly Terrain(Km) 128.4 130.6 4 Brown Field - - 5 Green Field 253.1 240.110 Wild life Sanctuary 6 - - Length(Km) 7 RF/PF Length(Km) 15.7 18.9 8 Land Required (Hacter) 1771.8 936.4 9 Land Cost(Cr.) 1389.1 749.1 10 R&R Cost(Cr.) 67.4 45.2 11 Utility Cost(Cr.) 67.4 36.0 12 Tunnel Length(Km) 4.9 5.7 13 Tunnel Cost(Cr.) 1227.5 1425.0 14 Viaduct Length(Km) 3.9 15 Viaduct Cost(Cr.) 975.0 16 Total Civil Cost (Cr.) 6741.3 4518.0 17 Per Km Civil Cost(Cr.) 26.6 18.8 Total Project Cost 18 8197.8 8092.4 Including all (Cr.) Per Km Cost Including 19 32.4 33.7 All(Cr.)

100Kmph for both Hilly 100Kmph for both Hilly & 20 Design Speed (Kmph) & Plain Terrain Plain Terrain

Achieved Riding Speed 21 70 70 (Kmph) 22 Travel Time(Hrs) 3.62 3.42 Project Length & Cost is Project Length & Cost is 23 Remarks more than the Option- less than the Option 3A 3B 24 Recommendation Not Recommended Recommended

3.4 Size and Magnitude of Operation

 The total length of the proposed Phase-2 road is 240.110Kms.

 Total Project Area is 1689.97 ha

3.5 Project Description The Phase-2 of the proposed project pertains to Development of Economic corridors, Inter-Corridors, Feeder routes and coastal road primarily to improve freight movement in the country, Lot-3/Odisha & Jharkhand/Package-2.

3.6 Starting and Ending Location The Starting Point of Phase-2 of the Proposed Alignment of Economic Corridor is Dhanara village at Nabarangpur district and ends point is Tumbigura village at Koraput district of OdishaState. The total length of Phase-2 of this economic corridor is 240.110 Km.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 9 Pre-feasibility Report

3.7 Details of Major Town/Village/Built-Up Area along Phase-2 section of the Economic Corridor Road:

The Alignment Passes through Nabarangpur & Koraput District in Odisha.

3.8 Details of District & State of Phase-2 of the Proposed Economic Corridor Road:

 The Alignment passes through the state ofOdisha.

 In Odisha State alignment passes through two Districts Nabarangpur and Koraput.

Table No. C3-4: Abstract of Project Road: Sl. No. State Length (Km) 1 Odisha 240.110 Total 240.110

Table No. C3-5: Details of Tunnel along the Proposed Alignment: Sl. Location Length Description State No. From Ch. To ch. (Km) 1 Tunnel-1 337.650 340.800 Odisha 3.150 2 Tunnel-2 344.750 347.300 Odisha 2.550 Total 5.700

3.9 Raw Materials, mode of transportation of raw materials and finished product The Project entails development of an economic corridor and will require road construction materials. Construction material like aggregates, sand, stone, etc. shall be procured from nearby approved quarries. Separate environmental approval shall be sought for any new quarry.

3.10 Resource Optimization / Recycling andReuse Measures shall be taken to use the materials saved from other projects of NHAI. Also the soil excavated for the project shall be used for backfilling, site leveling and greenbelt development. Sewage shall be treated either in the bio-toilets or recycling chambers attached with septic tanks. Used oil generated from DG sets shall be properly stored in HDPE drums and shall be sold to the government approved recycling agencies.

The Project will reuse the soil and other material in the following ways:-

• Topsoil from the agriculture land shall be stored separately for utilization in avenue and median plantation. The earth material excavated from the high- rise area shall be used for backfilling of low laying area andembankment.

• Sewage shall be routed through portable STP or diverted into the soak pit. Treated water from STP will be used for sprinkling orgardening.

• Oil generated from Diesel Generator (DG) sets shall be properly stored in HDPE drums and to be sold to State Pollution Control Board (PCB) approved recyclingvendor.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 10 Pre-feasibility Report

3.11 Water and Energy- Source andAvailability

In addition to the Sub-Clause 111.8.3 of MoRTH Specifications, The Contractor shall source the requirement of water preferably from surface water bodies, rivers, canals and tanks in the project area. Only at locations where surface water sources are not available, the Contractor can contemplate extraction of ground water, after intimation and consent from the CGWB.

To avoid disruption/disturbance to other water users, the Contractor shall extract water from fixed locations and consult the local people before finalizing the locations. The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Ground Water Department and seek their approval for extraction of groundwater.

Bore wells installed and used for the project shall be left in good operating condition for the use of local communities. The Contractor shall prevent any interference with the supply to or abstraction from, and prevent any pollution of, water resources as a result of the execution of the Works.

The total water demand of the project is 7984154 KL, which is inclusive of  7891744 KL for Construction purpose  38682 KL for domestic consumption and utilities requirement  26864 KL for gardening/ green beltdevelopment  26864 KL for DustSuppression The water requirement for the construction phase will be met by water tankers from approved vendors. Bore-well, if required, will be operated after approval from the competent authority.

Power, during construction, will be sourced from local distribution company. DG sets as alternative arrangement will also be arranged in construction camp.

3.12 Quantity of wastes to be generated and scheme for their management and disposal

Waste management shall be done as per Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 and Construction and demolition waste Management Rules 2016.

The waste generated from the project shall be mostly food and construction waste which shall be generated by the workers.

The approximate quantity of wastes to be generated from the project is 1000 Kg per day. As per CPHEEO Norms, 500 grams of solid wastes are generated per unit employee/worker.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 11 Pre-feasibility Report

CHAPTER-4 SITE ANALYSIS

4.1 Site Connectivity: The proposed road shall connect different parts of Chhattisgarh. The proposed stretch is directly connected to various important roads and railway stations.

The length proposed for the stretch measures 240.110 Kms and the Starting Point of phase-2 of Proposed Alignment of Economic Corridor is Dhanara village at ch.123.210 km.

The nearby railway stations are Koraput Railway Station, 6.5km (approx.) in West direction (Ch.385.000).

Raipur Airport is125 km from starting point of Highway. Hence the site is well connected to other parts of the country.

4.2 Land Form, Use & Ownership The landform or the topography of the project stretch is undulating plain with varying elevations. The land use of the proposed stretch is agricultural with patches of settlements. Majority of the land is owned by local farmers and other private stakeholders. However, there are patches which are owned by government as well.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 12 Pre-feasibility Report

Table No. C4-1: Details of Village wise Area Details (Nabarangpur District) Chainage Pvt. Pvt. Govt. Govt. Forest Forest Total Total Sl. Name of Village Name Plot Area Plot Area Plot Area Plot Area No Tahasil From To No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) 1 Dhanara 123.210 126.460 25 10.1779 6 0.1627 9 12.5750 40 22.9156 2 Amapara 126.460 127.440 15 3.4163 0 0.0000 2 3.3532 17 6.7695 3 Tarangapur 127.440 128.830 18 3.7431 7 0.3862 4 5.9773 29 10.1067 4 Dhungiadihi 128.830 130.300 9 2.4716 2 0.1012 3 7.7684 14 10.3412 5 Kalepara 130.300 130.970 6 0.9850 1 2.3762 3 1.3049 10 4.6661 6 Sargiguda 130.975 133.265 17 4.7255 1 3.2163 7 8.1401 25 16.0819 7 Kaskonga 133.265 135.660 24 8.8255 7 4.1200 5 3.8326 36 16.7781 8 Jarapara 135.660 135.750 2 0.1182 1 0.3576 0 0.0000 3 0.4758 9 Borgan 135.660 138.665 23 7.0191 7 2.6622 8 11.6138 38 21.2951 10 Raighara Hirrapara 138.665 138.830 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 1 1.1719 1 1.1719 11 Daspur 138.830 141.125 3 0.2144 4 2.2158 7 14.0076 14 16.4378 12 Biripur 141.125 143.050 8 3.5315 2 4.8347 4 3.3534 14 11.7196 13 Katuarpara 143.050 144.870 17 5.6214 9 4.3634 1 2.6037 27 12.5885 14 Hatibena 144.870 145.700 6 1.1193 0 0.0000 3 4.6790 9 5.7983 15 Junuanipara 145.700 147.350 19 6.3009 9 0.3778 4 4.7107 32 11.3894 16 Deogan 149.165 150.240 12 4.4116 0 0.0000 3 2.9354 15 7.3470 17 Kurubela 150.240 153.370 22 13.5485 4 0.1816 8 8.8112 34 22.5413 18 Birsarihi 153.370 153.425 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 1 0.0590 1 0.0590 19 Kacharpara 153.425 158.065 36 12.0396 7 2.1604 17 18.7034 60 32.9034 20 Andrigura 159.750 160.315 0 0.0000 1 0.0989 3 3.8519 4 3.9509 21 Matgan 160.315 164.280 11 3.7093 13 2.9509 12 16.6337 36 23.2939 22 Kesarabera 161.300 161.920 2 0.4996 1 0.1208 1 3.8649 4 4.4853 Sukigan Alias 23 4 1.3035 5 12.3684 6 4.8190 15 18.4909 Dabiriguda 164.280 166.895 24 Umarkote Kharka 166.895 168.090 16 4.5170 2 0.2983 2 3.6166 20 8.4318 25 Murtama 168.090 170.900 33 10.7313 2 0.4022 7 8.5746 42 19.7081 26 Dangarigura 170.860 172.430 18 8.5271 3 0.4566 7 1.9913 28 10.9750 27 Tisagura 172.410 172.820 7 2.8419 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 7 2.8419 28 PujhariBarandi 172.820 175.250 29 10.0643 6 0.8391 3 4.2857 38 15.1891 29 Adhikarigura 174.730 175.745 4 1.0001 6 1.4319 3 2.8743 13 5.3063

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 13 Pre-feasibility Report

Chainage Pvt. Pvt. Govt. Govt. Forest Forest Total Total Sl. Name of Village Name Plot Area Plot Area Plot Area Plot Area No Tahasil From To No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) 30 Kochiniamba 175.740 176.050 1 0.0236 2 0.1422 2 1.4240 5 1.5898 31 Chhanchanbera 175.950 176.930 13 1.5527 2 0.0724 4 5.6470 19 7.2721 32 Umarkote 176.970 177.150 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 1 1.4442 1 1.4442 33 Badakumari 177.150 180.250 14 5.4976 2 0.4742 5 15.7596 21 21.7314 34 Kutuguda 180.250 182.380 2 9.2402 0 0.0000 2 4.8872 4 14.1274 35 Mahuli 182.380 184.900 10 2.1593 1 0.6200 3 14.9149 14 17.6942 Umarkote 36 Karamari 184.900 185.450 8 3.7443 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 8 3.7443 37 185.450 186.780 10 6.8048 1 2.6992 0 0.0000 11 9.5041 38 Majia 186.780 187.970 22 5.8387 0 0.0000 4 2.3600 26 8.1987 Jharigaon 39 Turanji 187.970 189.658 14 2.3965 8 0.7064 40 8.8257 62 11.9286 40 Umarkote MalikaGuda 189.658 191.050 7 0.9684 0 0.0000 16 8.7628 23 9.7312 41 Jharigaon MandiaGuda 191.050 191.280 5 0.9423 6 0.6769 0 0.0000 11 1.6192 42 Nandapura 191.280 194.295 81 10.0637 26 2.9541 50 8.8238 157 21.8416 43 Parasubeda 194.295 196.120 32 4.0391 34 4.2400 27 3.6696 93 11.9487 44 Muliaguda 196.120 196.870 11 2.4136 1 0.0040 6 2.7910 18 5.2087 45 Khuntaguda 197.350 197.860 0 0.0000 1 0.0696 2 3.5935 3 3.6632 46 Ambaguda 197.860 199.530 57 6.5187 8 0.6688 27 4.4101 92 11.5976 47 Dabugaon Ramanaguda 199.495 201.670 45 11.0334 33 3.7179 5 0.5477 83 15.2990 48 Chhelibera 201.670 203.200 47 7.0849 24 2.4675 7 0.6255 78 10.1779 49 Motigan 203.060 203.160 2 0.1017 2 0.4687 3 0.1627 7 0.7331 50 Talbera 204.700 206.400 41 8.1421 15 1.8364 12 2.4468 68 12.4253 51 Godegan 207.370 208.025 7 1.7733 3 0.8104 7 2.0748 17 4.6585 52 Khuntuluguda 208.025 209.295 17 2.6959 13 2.3016 22 3.9485 52 8.9460 53 Papdahandi Hatibeda 209.295 210.015 0 0.0000 1 0.9578 15 4.1074 16 5.0652 54 Bhaluguda 210.015 210.435 8 1.0274 3 0.9777 7 0.9644 18 2.9695 55 Dabugaon BadaOlama 210.435 210.950 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 2 3.6114 2 3.6114 56 Sano Olama 210.950 211.375 19 1.4314 10 1.6022 0 0.0000 29 3.0336 57 Dangara 211.375 216.690 153 24.1158 53 6.1284 15 2.4972 221 32.7414 58 Khutuguda 216.690 217.720 18 2.5194 6 0.4448 10 4.2127 34 7.1769 Papdahandi 59 Biriguda 217.720 221.250 108 19.8968 15 2.8988 11 2.3027 134 25.0983 60 Silakagura 221.250 221.950 24 4.1471 5 0.8832 0 0.0000 29 5.0303

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 14 Pre-feasibility Report

Chainage Pvt. Pvt. Govt. Govt. Forest Forest Total Total Sl. Name of Village Name Plot Area Plot Area Plot Area Plot Area No Tahasil From To No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) 61 Dengagura 221.950 223.450 37 7.6369 15 1.6565 7 1.0669 59 10.3603 62 Karki 223.425 225.805 76 11.6925 20 3.5277 2 2.0865 98 17.3067 63 Palpur 225.805 226.858 37 5.2627 4 0.6164 1 1.6671 42 7.5462 64 Chatahandi 226.858 227.092 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 1 1.4320 1 1.4320 65 Teliguda 227.092 227.860 10 1.6535 1 0.1084 2 4.2193 13 5.9812 Nabarangpur 66 Bikrampur 227.860 230.265 38 6.3290 12 1.0253 6 9.1161 56 16.4704 67 Deula 230.265 231.930 50 10.3207 6 1.5502 0 0.0000 56 11.8709 68 Bhatara 231.930 232.880 23 4.6002 8 1.0158 4 1.0280 35 6.6440 69 Nabarangpur Daspur 232.880 234.695 67 9.9240 8 0.7476 1 1.7772 76 12.4488 70 Pujariguda 234.695 238.200 77 13.0610 7 4.1778 15 7.3717 99 24.6105 Total 1577 348.1167 462 99.7321 478 310.6928 2517 758.5416

Table No. C4-2: Details of Village wise Area Details (Koraput District) Chainage Pvt. Pvt. Govt. Govt. Forest Forest Total Sl. Name of Total Village Name Plot Area Plot Area Plot Area Area No Tahasil From To Plot No. No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) (Hectre) 1 Parasala 238.200 241.455 32 8.2331 3 3.1310 5 8.8282 40 20.1923 2 Patigan 239.150 239.685 14 3.7972 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 14 3.7972 3 Champia 241.455 244.010 43 16.4942 5 0.4118 2 1.2405 50 18.1465 244.010 244.950 4 Kaliagura 245.205 245.300 24 8.6119 9 1.4128 2 0.8270 35 10.8517 246.220 246.720 5 Kamara 246.720 248.285 31 8.4268 7 2.6509 0 0.0000 38 11.0777 Boriguma 6 Kaneijuba 247.437 247.545 4 0.0640 0 0.0000 1 0.0080 5 0.0720 7 Kutulugura 248.285 249.385 27 7.8210 2 0.4524 0 0.0000 29 8.2734 8 Kupia 249.385 249.845 11 3.3799 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 11 3.3799 9 Hardoli 249.845 256.270 110 29.8250 14 4.4992 10 10.0272 134 44.3514 10 Sandubuli 256.270 257.100 14 5.1163 1 0.0162 1 0.8218 16 5.9543 11 Benasur 257.100 260.500 52 14.6788 3 0.9878 1 0.1542 56 15.8208 12 Keraput 259.055 260.250 20 7.2659 2 0.1297 2 1.0490 24 8.4446

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 15 Pre-feasibility Report

Chainage Pvt. Pvt. Govt. Govt. Forest Forest Total Sl. Name of Total Village Name Plot Area Plot Area Plot Area Area No Tahasil From To Plot No. No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) (Hectre) 13 Gujunigura 260.500 262.950 37 12.9996 10 4.1800 0 0.0000 47 17.1796 14 Benagan 262.950 264.430 45 10.0558 6 0.7993 1 0.0081 52 10.8632 15 Lathigura 264.430 265.710 31 7.9936 4 0.9314 0 0.0000 35 8.9250 16 Piteigura 265.710 266.720 20 5.4193 10 1.6762 0 0.0000 30 7.0955 17 Chandalgura 266.720 271.970 9 12.0110 0 0.0000 9 24.2840 18 36.2950 18 Arapur 273.080 275.535 39 9.9413 12 5.3928 1 0.2940 52 15.6281 Dasamantpur 19 Majhigura 275.535 276.925 29 7.1430 4 0.7297 6 1.8063 39 9.6790 276.925 279.160 20 Litigura 279.160 279.260 20 4.7451 12 13.0350 0 0.0000 32 17.7801 279.950 280.250 Koraput 21 Karangura 280.250 280.300 1 0.3123 1 0.0406 0 0.0000 2 0.3529 22 Daliam 280.300 283.000 46 14.7943 13 3.8865 1 0.2678 60 18.9486 23 Rengagura 283.000 283.880 10 4.0179 6 2.4812 0 0.0000 16 6.4991 24 Dasamantpur Kartas 283.880 287.260 30 7.5790 3 7.4237 3 5.2659 36 20.2686 287.260 288.050 25 Tala 33 12.7677 7 3.6324 4 5.1588 44 21.5589 Koraput 288.330 290.400 26 Dunguri 288.050 288.330 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 1 0.3035 1 0.3035 27 Baunsaguar 290.400 292.300 24 10.2662 4 1.5674 4 2.0724 32 13.9060 Dasamantpur 28 Purimunda 292.300 293.530 40 8.2648 6 0.5565 1 0.0937 47 8.9150 293.530 295.230 29 Baragura 45 10.1737 11 3.1537 0 0.0000 56 13.3274 296.330 296.500 30 Koraput Bilaput 295.230 295.550 5 1.1804 2 0.7354 0 0.0000 7 1.9158 31 Bakaragura 295.550 296.330 12 4.6542 4 0.9070 0 0.0000 16 5.5612 32 Chhaagan 296.500 300.230 56 17.6891 18 9.7950 0 0.0000 74 27.4841 33 Kalpari 300.230 303.060 80 19.5803 7 0.3249 0 0.0000 87 19.9052 34 Charanguli 303.060 305.920 71 16.9594 5 2.7521 0 0.0000 76 19.7115 35 Lunguri 305.920 309.970 75 22.2020 7 2.4124 2 4.0174 84 28.6318 36 Semiliguda Kokorigura 309.970 313.170 52 14.5601 14 8.2546 0 0.0000 66 22.8147 37 Kutugan 313.170 315.430 30 9.1358 11 4.6684 0 0.0000 41 13.8042 38 Pungar 315.110 317.390 17 6.1173 18 4.6310 2 4.8633 37 15.6116 39 Sirimora 317.270 317.320 7 2.0174 4 1.6898 0 0.0000 11 3.7072

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 16 Pre-feasibility Report

Chainage Pvt. Pvt. Govt. Govt. Forest Forest Total Sl. Name of Total Village Name Plot Area Plot Area Plot Area Area No Tahasil From To Plot No. No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) No. (Hectre) (Hectre) 318.400 318.880 40 Kunduli 317.380 318.400 31 8.3555 0 0.0000 0 0.0000 32 8.3555 41 Gadikhamar 318.880 320.600 53 9.9435 6 2.0938 0 0.0000 59 12.0373 42 Hatagura 320.600 321.350 23 6.0203 3 0.2451 1 0.0120 27 6.2774 43 Dusura 321.350 324.490 134 21.3309 7 0.4437 2 0.1740 143 21.9486 44 Bhitaragura 324.820 325.200 12 2.9325 3 0.1013 0 0.0000 15 3.0338 45 Gunta 325.200 328.200 84 17.9586 12 1.4984 1 0.5115 97 19.9685 46 Patu 328.070 328.200 1 0.6574 2 0.8817 0 0.0000 3 1.5391 47 Sankar 328.200 328.750 4 1.1013 5 1.3742 0 0.0000 9 2.4755 48 Deopatangi 328.750 329.300 15 2.9426 5 2.4568 0 0.0000 20 5.3994 49 Pukali 329.300 334.350 126 31.9107 17 8.1714 0 0.0000 143 40.0821 334.350 337.750 50 Baraja 93 19.4637 25 5.6169 0 0.0000 118 25.0806 338.490 338.700 51 Kandili 340.700 343.140 49 9.5037 16 7.5088 0 0.0000 65 17.0125 Patangi 52 Peturu 343.140 344.770 35 10.9300 3 0.7868 1 0.1841 39 11.9009 53 Tedha 344.770 344.850 0 0.0000 2 0.4024 0 0.0000 2 0.4024 54 Kurli 344.850 345.850 22 5.4533 4 0.7445 4 0.3837 30 6.5815 347.390 350.640 55 Ampabili 34 6.7196 27 26.7801 0 0.0000 61 33.4997 353.810 355.200 56 Talagolar 350.640 352.110 28 7.6010 12 1.8788 2 1.3547 42 10.8345 57 Sikaparu 352.110 353.810 19 4.8607 11 5.8289 1 0.0642 31 10.7538 58 Olaparu 355.200 359.240 38 11.6001 28 14.7518 4 1.0667 70 27.4186 359.520 359.660 359.950 360.800 59 Patangi Tumbigura 16 6.5880 8 1.5152 3 2.0395 27 10.1427 360.910 361.180 361.850 363.320 Total 2063 552.1681 441 182.4294 78 77.1816 2583 811.7791

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 17 Pre-feasibility Report

4.3 Existing Land-use Pattern The land use of the proposed stretch is mostly agricultural with patches of settlements.

4.4 Existing Infrastructure About 129villages are falling in the proposed stretch. The details shall be provided in the EIA report.

4.5 Details of Major Town/Village/Built-Up Area along Economic Corridor Road: The Alignment Passes through Nabarangpur & Koraput district.

4.6 Details of District inphase-2 of Proposed Economic Corridor Road:

 The Phase-2 Alignment passes through state ofOdisha.

 In Odisha State alignment passes through four Districts Nabarangpur and Koraput.

Table No. C4-3: Abstract of Project Road in the State:

Sl. No. State Length (Km) 1 Odisha 240.110 Total 240.110

4.7 Soil Classification Soils of Odisha have been divided into 8 broad soil groups which are given in detail here. The main features are coarse texture, single grained to weakly granular structured surface soil, highly porous with low available water holding capacity.

4.8 Climatic Data from Secondary Sources: The climate of area around the proposed alignment is tropical. It is hot and humid because of its proximity to the Tropic of Cancer and its dependence on the monsoons for rains. Summer temperatures can reach 45.2 °C. The monsoon season is from late June to October and is a welcome respite from the heat. Odisha receives an average 1320.9 millimeters of rain. Winter is from November to January. Winters are pleasant with low temperatures and lesshumidity. About one third of the total rainfall is brought by the northeast monsoon. October and November see low-pressure systems and tropical cyclones form in the Bay of which, along with the northeast monsoon, bring rains to the southern and coastal regions of the state.

Table No. C4-3: Climate Data

State Temperature Humidity Rainfall Wind Speed Max. Min. Max. Min. (mm) (kmph) Odisha 38.0 5.8 84 41 1320.9 7.4

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 18 Pre-feasibility Report

4.9 Available SocialInfrastructure There are a 129 number of villages falling in the proposed stretch. The details shall be provided in the EIA report.

4.10 Forest & WildlifeArea The proposed stretch doesn’t pass through any eco-sensitive zone of Wildlife sanctuary or national park.

Table No. C4-4: Details of Reserve/Protected Forest in Odisha State

Nabarangpur District of Odisha Forest Details Chainage Chainage Length Area Sl No Name of the Forest (From (To Km) (Km) (Hectre) Km) 1 Hatigan Reserve Jungle 147.350 149.165 1.815 12.86 2 Karka Reserve Jungle 158.065 159.750 1.685 11.87 3 Podagada reserve Jungle 180.250 180.600 0.350 0.76 4 Sarguli Reserve Forest 194.950 195.165 0.215 1.04 5 Sarguli Reserve Forest 196.870 197.350 0.48 3.28 6 Dargula Reserve Forest 203.200 204.700 1.500 10.46 7 Godegan Reserve Forest 206.400 207.370 0.970 6.80 8 Dangara Reserve Forest 215.600 216.350 0.750 5.18 Total Reserve Forest 7.765 52.25 Total Revenue Forest 310.693 Total Forest 362.94

Koraput District of Odisha Forest Details Chainage Chainage Area Sl No Name of the Forest (From Length(Km) (To Km) (Hectre) Km) 1 RF 244.950 245.205 0.255 1.81 2 Kaliagura RF 245.300 246.220 0.920 6.48 3 Jungle Block 271.970 273.080 1.110 7.80 4 Jungle Block 278.945 279.12 0.175 1.24 5 Jungle Block 279.260 279.95 0.690 4.87 6 Jungle Block 324.490 324.820 0.330 2.34 7 Jungle Block 337.750 338.490 0.740 5.26 8 Jungle Block 338.700 340.700 2.000 14.09 9 Jungle Block 345.850 347.390 1.540 10.44 10 Ampabili Reserve Forest 359.240 359.520 0.280 1.93 11 Ampabili Reserve Forest 359.950 362.230 2.280 1.92 12 Jungle Block 360.800 360.910 0.110 1.40 13 Jungle Block 361.180 361.850 0.670 2.53 14 Jungle Block 362.230 362.260 0.030 5.29 Total Reserve Forest 11.130 67.41 Total Revenue Forest 77.18 Total Forest 144.59 Total in Odisha State 507.53

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 19 Pre-feasibility Report

4.11 Traffic Census Data

Table No. C4-5: Traffic Data Year Chhattisgarh/Odisha Border Papdahandi to Odisha/AP Project to Papdahandi Section Border Section Warrants 2019 8553 9582 Base Year 2023 22283 23453 Opening Year 2028 33686 36062 5th Year 2033 43638 47345 10th Year 2038 60044 61748 15th Year 2043 67378 78914 20th Year

Table No. C4-6: Traffic Volume Count (TVC)

Sr. Link Section Location Road ID No. 1 CV01 Kundei-Raighar Kundei SH-40 2 CV02 Raighar-Umerkote Raighar SH-40 3 CV03 Umerkote- Umerkote SH-39 4 CV04 Papadahandi-Nawrangpur Papadahandi NH-26 5 CV05 Nawrangpur-Borigumma Nawrangpur NH-26 6 CV06 Borigumma-Koraput Borigumma SH-48 7 CV07 Borigumma-Jeypore Borigumma NH-26 8 CV08 Jeypore-Koraput Jeypore NH-26 9 CV09 Koraput-Similiguda Koraput NH-26 10 CV10 Similiguda-Ondranagi/AP Border Similiguda NH-26

Table No. C4-7: Origin-Destination Survey

Sr. No. Link Location Section Details 1 OD01 Papadahandi-Junagarh (NH-201) Outside 2 OD02 Nowrangpur-Borigumma sections 3 OD03 Borigumma-Jagdalpur 4 OD04 Umerkote-Papadahandi 5 OD05 Inside Koraput-Jaipur 6 OD06 sections Koraput-Simliguda

4.12 Origin and Destination Survey To estimate travel characteristics in the region and the traffic streams, Origin & Destination (O-D) survey was carried out for 24 hours respectively. Both passenger and commercial vehicles plying on the project corridor were stopped on a random sampling basis and interviewed. Along with the OD survey, volume count survey has been carried out at both locations to observe the sample size. Travel characteristics like origin, destination and frequency of trip collected for passenger vehicles. For goods vehicles, the survey elicited characteristics like origin, destination, frequency, and commodity being transported.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 20 Pre-feasibility Report

4.13 Zoning System The zoning system has been defined by all important towns lying on the project road at the first stage and nearby districts having immediate influence on the project road at the second level. The remaining states beyond the influence area were aggregated broadly into northern, eastern and southern direction of the project highway. The details of the traffic zones adopted for the study are presented in table

Table No. C4-8: O-D Zone Code

A. Local Zones (within PIA) B. Surrounding state zones Zones Description Description Z-1 Dhamtari , CG Z-13 Raipur & Surroundings Rajnandgaon/Bhilai and western Z-2 Z-14 Dugli/Nagri, CG CG Z-3 Raigarh , Odisha Z-15 Bilaspur ,North CG Z-4 Umerkote , Odisha Z-16 , Eastern CG Z-5 Nowrangpur , Odisha Z-17 /Pendara , CG Z-6 Borrigumma , Odisha Z-18 , North Odisha Z-7 Jaypore , Odisha Z-19 , north/east odisha Z-8 Koraput , Odisha Z-20 /East Orissa Z-9 Sunnabeda , Odisha Z-21 Srikakulam/East Andhra Pradesh Z-10 Salur , Andhara Pradesh Z-22 Vishakhapatanam , AP Z-11 Ramabhadrapuram , AP Z-23 Rest of Andhra Pradesh Z-12 Vizianagaram , AP Z-24 Araku& Surroundings C. Outside state zones Z-25 Odisha Zones Description Z-26 Jagdalpur Z-29 MP/Rajasthan/North States/ West UP Z-27 Kondagaon CG Z-30 Maharastra,Goa, south MP Z-28 Kanker , CG Z-31 Telangana, karnataka, Kerala Z-32 Tamilnadu, Pondicherry, South Kerala Z-33 East UP, , JharK, WB, NE States

4.14 Traffic Growth Rates 4.14.1 Past traffic growth rates The project road route did not exist as a single corridor in the past, hence past information may not be relevant for the project road. Further, no time series data on adjoining routes/ existing roads along the project route could be availed for making an objective assessment of past trend. Growth of motor vehicles in the state is however considered in the econometric model.

4.14.2 Growth Estimate by Econometric Method

Table No. C4-9: Projected Traffic Growth Rates

Sl. No. Year 2-wheeler Car Bus Truck 1 2015-2025 13.5% 13.5% 11.3% 10.5% 2 2026-2035 10.5% 10.5% 8.8% 8.2% 3 2036 and beyond 8.0% 8.0% 6.7% 6.2%

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 21 Pre-feasibility Report

High growth is estimated for the first 10-year block period as per the adopted Elasticities of demand. It’s difficult to make an estimate of transport demand beyond 10 years. However, with growth of economy, elasticities are likely to shrink and a tapered down demand @ 10% per 10-year block is considered.

4.15 Growth Rates for Slow Vehicles The slow-moving vehicles essentially cater to very short haul traffic, meeting localized demand for transportation of passengers and goods from rural areas to the nearest market towns and urban centers.

4.16 Traffic Forecast The base year traffic flow is the primary input for determination of future traffic demand. In present study the base year for traffic has been taken as the year of project studies, i.e., 2019. Traffic on the project road would consist of 1) Normal Traffic, 2) Divertible Traffic, 3) Generated Traffic, and 4) Induced Traffic, if any.

4.16.1 Normal Traffic Normal traffic is derived from primary survey (Classified Volume Count) on the existing road network and adjusted to seasonal variation of traffic, if any. The annual average daily traffic, AADT as reported in the sections above makes the normal traffic for the project road links.

4.16.2Divertible Traffic Divertible traffic is derived from OD surveys undertaken on the parallel and competing routes. This dealt in detail in the previous section of this Chapter. As project road section of Raipur-Vizag not part of a trunk route very few freight movements takes place. Potential divertible traffic from existing road network has been identified and an assignment thereof is discussed as part of OD analyses.

4.17 Generated Traffic Enhanced infrastructure facility promotes economic activity in the project influence area. Benefits derived from lower operating costs partially translate to additional vehicular trips. Therefore, generated traffic is expected on the project road once existing road is developed and opened to traffic in the year 2023. A generated/ induced traffic of @10% of normal and diverted traffic is considered for the proposed expressway, for a period of 10 years since 2015.

4.18 Induced Traffic There are potential developments by augmentation of capacity and/ or new industries in and around mining belts. Mining has been major contributor in the State’s economy. Mining and industry has however grown at a bit lesser rate compared to State Income. While planned activities are likely to boost transport demand, the same will be shared by the road network under development in parallel corridors too. Therefore, No additional traffic on account of Industry is assigned to the project corridor.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 22 Pre-feasibility Report

CHAPTER-5 PLANNING BRIEF

5.1 Planning Brief The proposed project is in the feasibility study stage. After the completion of feasibility studies and grant of ToR the Detailed Project Report shall be completed which shall comprise of the complete planning brief of the project. The highlights of the same shall be provided in the EIA report.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 23 Pre-feasibility Report

CHAPTER-6 PROPOSED INFRASTRUCTURE

6.1 IndustrialArea

Not applicable

6.2 ResidentialArea

Not applicable

6.3 GreenBelt Avenue plantation on both sides of the highway for improvement of landscape and aesthetic view of the area as per IRC:SP:21. It shall be made sure that the species to be chosen shall be local and no alien species shall be introduced.The area to be earmarked for greenbelt development shall be provided in the EIA report.

6.4 SocialInfrastructure Bus & truck lay Bye and rest areas with toilet facilities shall be developed along the proposed Project. Location of these facilities will be finalized after consultation withstakeholders.

6.5 Connectivity The phase-2 of the proposed project is itself a National Highway.

6.6 Drinking WaterManagement Drinking water shall be arranged from Tanker Supply and thus no permanent installation shall be required for the labourers. It is estimated that a total of approximately 26864 KL water will be required for consumption of construction workers.

6.7 SewerageSystem Portable bio-toilets or septic tanks shall be provided for construction and operational workers.

6.8 Industrial Waste Management Defunct machineries or parts of the mixing plants shall be stored at designated place before selling the scrap to an approved vendor.

6.9 Solid WasteManagement The solid waste generated by the workers shall be only municipal solid waste which shall be segregated at site itself by provision of coloured bins. The wastes shall be collected from there and dumped in government designated sites. Waste management shall be done as per Solid Waste Management Rules, 2016 & and Construction and demolition waste Management Rules 2016.

In addition to the Sub-Clause 111.4 of MoRTH Specifications, The Contractor shall adopt the following MitigationMeasures.

 Control of Soil Erosion and sedimentation (Clause306.3)

 Control of WaterPollution

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 24 Pre-feasibility Report

The Contractor shall avoid construction works close to the streams or water bodies during monsoon. All precautionary measures shall be taken to prevent the wastewater that is generated during construction from entering into streams, water bodies or the irrigation channels. Oil interceptors shall be provided for vehicle parking, wash down and refuelling areas.

The Contractor shall adopt the following rules and regulations for effective Control of Solid and Liquid waterManagement

 Schedule VI - General Standards for Discharge of Environmental Pollutants,CPCB

 The Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 and Water Act,1974.

 Petroleum Act, 1934 and subsequentamendments

 Rules and Environment (Protection) Rules, 1986 (Standards for Emission or Discharge of Environmental Pollutants Schedule-I)

 Annexure ‘A’ to Clause 501 (Protection of Environment) of MoRTHSpecification.

 Construction and Demolition Waste Management Rule2016

 Municipal Solid Waste Management Rule2016

The Contractor is to ensure that there is good drainage at all construction areas, to avoid creation of stagnant water bodies especially in urban/industrial areas, including water in old types.

6.10 Power Requirement-Supply &Source The power required for the project shall be 1000 kVA per day.

Required power will be sourced through the local distribution company of the State Electricity Board and DG sets will also be installed as power backup source.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 25 Pre-feasibility Report

CHAPTER-7 REHABILITATION & RESETTLEMENT (R & R) PLAN

7.1 Rehabilitation and Resettlement Plan Most of the land coming under the Project area is agricultural and built-up land. Along with this, the alignment of corridor passes through forest land, barren land, and water body area. The land required for the construction of economic corridor will be acquired by NHAI before the commencement of construction work.

The identification of the private and government structures are in progress and the drafting of Rehabilitation and resettlement plan shall be commenced after the identification of structures and consultation with stakeholders.

Land acquisition shall be undertaken as per the provision of National Highway Acts, 1956 & subsequent amendments but determination of compensation will be done as per RFCTLARR Act, 2013 in close accordance with respective state R&R Rules. Rehabilitation and resettlement plan will be prepared after detailed census survey during EIA Study and will be submitted in EIA Report.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 26 Pre-feasibility Report

CHAPTER-8 PROJECT SCHEDULE & COST ESTIMATES

8.1 Project Schedule and Cost Estimates The Project shall start its construction work after fulfillment of the following activities:

 Finalization and approval of Detailed ProjectReport.Receipt of Environmental clearance from MoEF&CC.

 Selection and on-boarding of Contractor for implementation works the completion period of the construction is estimated to be about 36 months.

 The tentative total estimated cost of the project is about INR 8092.4 Crores. However the detailed project cost shall be submitted after preparation of detailed project report.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 27 Pre-feasibility Report

CHAPTER-9 ANALYSIS OF PROPOSAL (FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS)

9.1 Analysis of Proposal The benefits of the Project are multi-fold. It will substantially reduce the travel time and the other remote areas falling on the alignment. In addition to the improved connectivity, it will also provide a boost to the economic status of the villages / towns falling in the dedicated Project area.

Overall improvement will be expected in local area in terms of:

 Better connectivity to economic, social and political hubs of Odisha  Faster growth and outreach to better and improvedfacilities  Fast and safe connectivity resulting in savings in fuel, travel time and total transportation cost

 Reduction inaccidents.  Better approach to medical & educationalservices  Faster transportation of perishable goods like fruits, vegetables, and dairyproducts  Better opportunities for transporting, processing and marketing of agriculturalproducts

 Development of local agriculture andhandicrafts  Development of tourism andpilgrimage  Opening up of opportunities for new occupations and trade on theroute  Indirect and direct employment opportunity to people from all skilled, semi- skilled and unskilledstreams  Improved quality of life for people and soon  Development of backward areas through rapid industrialization and access to distant markets  Creation of ancillary ecosystem through highway amenities, support services and industrial / manufacturingareas The project shall benefit the commuters travelling between Vishakhapatnam and Raipur. Thus, the project shall save fuel and time of commuters. The areas through which the proposed road passes is highly remote and thus the implementation of the project shall enhance connectivity of the villagers to the highly developed cities of the Odisha.

The felling of trees and structures to be affected are minimal.

Thus, as per the preliminary analysis and secondary data collected, the proposed project is financially, socially and environmentally feasible.

Yongma Engineering in JV with ARKITECHNO 28