DOCSLIB.ORG

Bulgaria Admits Schengen Entry Is Now a Long-Term Goal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bulgaria Admits Schengen Entry Is Now a Long-Term Goal EurActiv.com EU news and policy debates across languages Bulgaria admits Schengen entry is now a long-term goal Georgi Gotev 21-01-2014 (updated: 21-01-2014 ) Bulgaria admitted yesterday (20 January) that its accession to the EU's borderless Schengen area was likely to take place in 2017, one year before the country is expected to take over the rotating EU Council presidency. Foreign affairs minister Kristian Vigenin said he expected the decision concerning Bulgaria's bid to be taken in the course of 2014. Asked by EurActiv to elaborate, Vigenin explained that under the scenario, air borders would be opened in 2015, with land borders opening in 2017, when Bulgaria becomes a full member of the Schengen area. schengen_0.jpg He said this timeframe should be seen as a realistic “orientation” rather than a plan to which he could fully commit to. It has been more than three years since the European Commission considered that Bulgaria and Romania, which joined the EU in 2007, were technically ready to join Schengen. The former Prime Minister of Bulgaria Boyko Borissov said in 2009 (http://www.euractiv.com/future-eu/pm-borissov-bulgaria-cuts-living-flesh-balance-budget/article-185590) that Bulgaria’s objective was to join Schengen in 2011. However, a number of older EU members, in particular the Netherlands and Germany, still oppose the accession of the two newcomers and have used their veto on a number of occasions. CVM monitoring The Netherlands in particular insists that it would lift its veto after two positive monitoring reports under the European Commission’s so-called Cooperation and Verification Mechanism, or CVM (see background). However, no CVM report on Bulgaria and Romania has so far qualified as “positive”. Vigenin admitted that the EU monitoring would continue under the next European Commission that will be nominated in the Autumn for a five-year term. Regarding the CVM, he said it was necessary to have “calm” discussions with the EU executive on the future of this mechanism and the perspective of abandoning it, adding that such talks would probably take place after the new college of commissioners takes over. The minister said that it was necessary to see not only how Bulgaria complies with the CVM, but whether the mechanism works and whether it was able to attain its goals. 2018 watershed In this context, Vigenin said it was realistic to “give some time” to those discussions. As Bulgaria is expected to take over the rotating presidency of the EU Council in the second half of 2018, he said it would be “logical” for Sofia to have entered Schengen by then. “But don’t get me wrong – I am not for postponing the decisions until 2018. I am saying that until 2018 those issues must be solved,” Vigenin said. Bulgaria and Romania will be issued CVM reports on Wednesday. Vigenin admitted that he did not expect a “very positive report”, due to “objective reasons”. In fact, the Bulgarian authorities are more relaxed about this report than they have been in the past, as it will cover for the first time a one-year period in which three governments have succeeded (normally CVM reports cover a 6-month period). Consequently, the political responsibility for the expected negative report is likely to be split among key political players. The cabinet of Boyko Borissov resigned in February last year following boisterous public protests in Sofia and several other cities over the price of electricity. A caretaker government, led by Marin Raykov took charge until early elections were held on 12 May, installing a the price of electricity. A caretaker government, led by Marin Raykov took charge until early elections were held on 12 May, installing a minority government led by Plamen Oresharski. Bad press Speaking to EurActiv, Bulgarian diplomats who asked not to be named have complained that CVM reports regularly generate bad press, which according to them harms the investment climate. “Many EU countries experience shortcomings in their law-enforcement, why should only Bulgaria and Romania be stigmatised,” one diplomat argued. Sofia is in favour of monitoring the law-enforcement systems in all EU member states. Such ideas already make their way (http://www.euractiv.com/future-eu/bulgaria-romania-monitoring-insp-news-505976) as part of the effort to reform the Schengen system. For its part, Romania has said it remains ready for Schengen accession, but will not beg for a date, as it is tired of being told “next time”. “We are ready for Schengen when you are”, Romanian Interior Minister Radu Stroe recently told his EU colleagues (http://www.euractiv.com/justice/romania-older-members-ready-sche-news-532132), suggesting that his country was falling victim of rising populism in some EU countries. Romania will assume to rotating EU presidency in the second half of 2019. BACKGROUND When Romania and Bulgaria joined the EU on 1 January 2007, shortcomings remained regarding judicial reform and the fight against corruption. In the case of Bulgaria, problems also remained regarding the fight against organised crime. A Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) was set up to assist both countries with judiciary matters after their EU accession. Schengen is a village at the border between Luxembourg, France and Germany, where an agreement was signed in 1985 to gradually abolish checks at common borders between those countries, the Netherlands and Belgium. Gradually, the process was taken further. In 1995, border controls were abolished between Belgium, Germany, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain and Portugal. Today, the Schengen border-free area (http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/justice_freedom_security/free_movement_of_persons_asylum_immigration/l33020_en.htm) consists of 25 member states: 22 EU countries (all except Bulgaria, Romania, Ireland, the UK and Cyprus) as well as three associated countries: Norway, Iceland and Switzerland. Denmark has signed the Schengen agreement, but has kept its freedom not to apply certain measures. The UK and Ireland decided to stay outside the Schengen area. TIMELINE 22 Jan. 2014: Commission to publish monitoring reports on Bulgaria and Romania's progress under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM). FURTHER READING BLOGS: BlogActiv, Reuniting Europe: Bulgaria’s first seven years in the EU (http://reuniting- europe.blogactiv.eu/2014/01/03/bulgaria%E2%80%99s-first-seven-years-in-the-eu/#.Ut0987Tb9pg) PRESS ARTICLES EurActiv Greece ?νταξη στο Schengen το 2017, βλ?πει η Βουλγαρ?α (http://www.euractiv.gr/dieyrynsi/entaksi-sto-schengen-2017- blepei-i-boylgaria) Efficacité et Transparence des Acteurs Européens 1999-2016. EurActiv.com PLC (http://www.euractiv.com/about) | Terms and Conditions (http://www.euractiv.com/terms).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Magnitsky Law and the Rico
    SSRG International Journal of Economics and Management Studies Volume 8 Issue 7, 6-20, July, 2021 ISSN: 2393 – 9125 /doi:10.14445/23939125/IJEMS-V8I7P102 © 2021 Seventh Sense Research Group® The Magnitsky Law and The Rico Law - The Guarantee For The Fight Against Corruption And The Mafia In Bulgaria And The European Union - The Example of The Attempts To Steal Private Land Through Concession, Theft of Land And Theft of Land Through State Structures Lord Prof. PhD PhD Momtchil Dobrev-Halachev Scientific Research Institute Dobrev & Halachev.JSC., Sofia.Bulgaria Received Date: 17 May 2021 Revised Date: 22 June 2021 Accepted Date: 05 July 2021 Abstract - Lord prof PhD PhD Momtchil Dobrev- The fight against the mafia and corruption in Bulgaria Halachev and Prof. Mariola Garibova-DObreva and in the European Commission and the European Union developed 2006 “Theory of degree of democracy” and does not yield results because the mafia is at the highest “Theory of degree of justice / injustice /” based on their state and European level and does what it wants. This practice in court, prosecutor's office, state. Prof. Momchil mafia holds courts, prosecutors and all kinds of state Dobrev has been creating Theory of Corruption, "Theory institutions and the latter carry out its orders. of the Mafia," Theory of Mafia "," Financial Banking Resource Technological Mafia Materialism "since 2003" 1.1 Introduce the Problem The problem with the mafia and corruption in Bulgaria Keywords - Crise, mafia, corruption, Magnitsky law, and in the European Union and the European Commission RICO law, finance. is huge. We have repeatedly applied evidence of the scale .
    [Show full text]
  • Zornitsa Markova the KTB STATE
    Zornitsa Markova THE KTB STATE Sofia, 2017 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or express written consent from Iztok-Zapad Publishing House. transmitted in any form or by any means without first obtaining © Zornitsa Markova, 2017 © Iztok-Zapad Publishing House, 2017 ISBN 978-619-01-0094-2 zornitsa markova THE KTB STATE CHRONICLE OF THE LARGEST BANK FAILURE IN BULGARIA — THE WORKINGS OF A CAPTURED STATE THAT SOLD OUT THE PUBLIC INTEREST FOR PRIVATE EXPEDIENCY CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS / 12 EDITOR’S FOREWORD / 13 SUMMARY / 15 READER’S GUIDE TO THE INVESTIGATION / 21 1. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND / 23 DEVELOPMENTS IN THE BULGARIAN BANKING SECTOR THAT PRE-DATE KTB ..........................................................25 Headed for a Banking Crisis .................................................................................................. 26 Scores of Banks Close Their Doors................................................................................... 29 First Private Bank — Backed by the Powerful, Favoured by the Government ......................................................... 33 Criminal Syndicates and Their Banks — the Birth of a State within the State ...........................................................................35 A Post-Crisis Change of Players ..........................................................................................37 A FRESH START FOR THE FLEDGLING KTB ..................................................... 40 KTB SALE ..........................................................................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Far from Stability: the Post-Election Landscape in Bulgaria Dariusz Kałan
    No. 50 (503), 15 May 2013 © PISM Editors: Marcin Zaborowski (Editor-in-Chief) . Katarzyna Staniewska (Managing Editor) Jarosław Ćwiek-Karpowicz . Artur Gradziuk . Piotr Kościński Roderick Parkes . Marcin Terlikowski . Beata Wojna Far from Stability: The Post-Election Landscape in Bulgaria Dariusz Kałan Early parliamentary elections not only will not help restore political stability in Bulgaria but also could further deepen the chaos because of the high dispersion of votes and the expected difficulties with creating a coalition. For a country immersed in crisis, maintaining the post-election stalemate is particularly not beneficial because of the deteriorating economic situation and growing public pressure. Regardless of which party will return to power, one should not expect a significant improvement in Bulgaria’s image in the EU or a positive settlement of the most important issues, including the country’s rapid accession to the Schengen area. Although the winner of the early parliamentary elections of 12 May was the centre-right Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria (GERB, 30% of votes), for all four parties that exceeded the 4% electoral threshold, the results can be seen as satisfactory. GERB, the ruling party in 2009–2013, won for the second time in a row during unfavourable economic and social situations. The similar support for the Bulgarian Socialist Party (27%), which received more than 600,000 additional votes than in 2009, is because of the mobilisation of its permanent electorate and generational changes in the party. Also, for the Movement for Rights and Freedoms (11%), which represents the Turkish minority, and the nationalist Attack party (7%), the results are a confirmation of their stable positions on the political scene.
    [Show full text]
  • HUMAN RIGHTS in BULGARIA in 2013 the Bulgarian Helsinki Committee Is an Independent Non-Governmental Organisation for the Protection of Human Rights
    HUMAN RIGHTS IN BULGARIA IN 2013 The Bulgarian Helsinki Committee is an independent non-governmental organisation for the protection of human rights. It was established on 14 July 1992. Chair: Krassimir Kanev Deputy chair: Desislava Simeonova Members of the General Assembly: Antoaneta Nenkova, Daniela Furtunova, Desislava Simeonova, Dimitrina Petrova, Georgi Bankov, Georgi Toshev, Iliana Savova, Ivan Bedrov, Kalina Bozeva, Kiril Ivanov, Krassimir Kanev, Margarita Ilieva, Ramadan Kehajov, Vassil Chaprazov, Valko Stanev, Yana Buhrer Tavanier. Contents Political developments in Bulgaria during 2013 5 Right to life, protection from torture, inhuman and degrading treatment 7 Right to liberty and security of person 12 Independence of the judiciary and fair trial 16 Right to respect for private and family life, home and the correspondence 21 Freedom of conscience and religion 23 Freedom of expression and access to information 26 Conditions in places of detention 33 Protection against discrimination 42 Right to asylum, freedom of movement 53 Women’s rights 60 Rights of the child 64 LGBTI rights 69 List of abbreviations AEJ Association of European Journalists – Bulgaria AIP Access to Information Programme BHC Bulgarian Helsinki Committee BNT Bulgarian National Television BSP Bulgarian Socialist Party CBS Correctional boarding schools CEM Council for Electronic Media CPA Child Protection Act ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights ESDRA Enforcement of Sentences and Detention under Remand Act FRA EU Fundamental
    [Show full text]
  • Political History of the Balkans (1989–2018) This Page Intentionally Left Blank POLITICAL HISTORY of the BALKANS (1989–2018) Edited by József Dúró – Zoltán Egeresi
    The Balkan Peninsula has played a crucial role in human history many times. The region framed the 20th century. The end of the Political History of the Balkans Cold War also had a significant effect on the region as it resulted (1989–2018) in bloody wars, economic collapse and complicated political transitions. The 2000s and 2010s opened the way towards EU membership, as many countries received candidate status and launched accession negotiations – however, this process has recently been facing obstacles. Political History This volume provides a general overview of the Post-Cold War history of the Balkans and explores the dynamics behind these tremendous changes ranging from democratic transitions to EU prospects. The authors describe the transitional period, the evolution of the political system and highlight the most important of the Balkans political developments in each country in the region. We recommend this book to those who seek a deeper insight into the recent history of the Balkans and a deeper understanding of its political developments. (1989–2018) POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE BALKANS (1989—2018) POLITICAL HISTORY The work was created in commission of the National University of Public Service under the priority project PACSDOP-2.1.2-CCHOP-15-2016-00001 entitled “Public Service Development Establishing Good Governance”. Zoltán Egeresi (eds.): Egeresi Zoltán — József Dúró József Edited by JÓZSEF DÚRÓ European Social Fund ZOLTÁN EGERESI INVESTING IN YOUR FUTURE Political History of the Balkans (1989–2018) This page intentionally left blank POLITICAL HISTORY OF THE BALKANS (1989–2018) Edited by József Dúró – Zoltán Egeresi Dialóg Campus Budapest, 2020 The work was created in commission of the National University of Public Service under the priority project PACSDOP-2.1.2-CCHOP-15-2016-00001 entitled “Public Service Development Establishing Good Governance”.
    [Show full text]
  • EUI RSCAS Working Paper 2020/84 the Politics of Differentiated Integration: What Do Governments Want? Country Report – Bulgari
    RSCAS 2020/84 Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) The Politics of Differentiated Integration: What do Governments Want? Country Report – Bulgaria Elitsa Markova European University Institute Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Integrating Diversity in the European Union (InDivEU) The Politics of Differentiated Integration: What do Governments Want? Country Report – Bulgaria Elitsa Markova EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2020/84 Terms of access and reuse for this work are governed by the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC- BY 4.0) International license. If cited or quoted, reference should be made to the full name of the author(s), editor(s), the title, the working paper series and number, the year and the publisher. ISSN 1028-3625 © Elitsa Markova, 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY 4.0) International license. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published in November 2020 by the European University Institute. Badia Fiesolana, via dei Roccettini 9 I – 50014 San Domenico di Fiesole (FI) Italy Views expressed in this publication reflect the opinion of individual author(s) and not those of the European University Institute. This publication is available in Open Access in Cadmus, the EUI Research Repository: https://cadmus.eui.eu Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies The Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, created in 1992 and currently directed by Professor Brigid Laffan, aims to develop inter-disciplinary and comparative research on the major issues facing the process of European integration, European societies and Europe’s place in 21st century global politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulgaria. Le Elezioni Europee Del 2019
    ISSN 1826-3534 15 MAGGIO 2019 Bulgaria. Le elezioni europee del 2019 di Arianna Angeli Ricercatore di Diritto pubblico comparato Università degli Studi di Milano Bulgaria. Le elezioni europee del 2019* di Arianna Angeli Ricercatore di Diritto pubblico comparato Università degli Studi di Milano Sommario: 1. Quadro politico e istituzionale. 2. Il sistema elettorale per le elezioni europee. 3. Le elezioni europee del 2014. 4. Campagna elettorale e forze politiche in competizione. 1. Quadro politico e istituzionale La Bulgaria è un paese che ha acquisito tardivamente la propria statualità, tra la fine del XIX e l’inizio del XX secolo. Sulla base di quanto stabilito al Congresso di Berlino, nel 1878 la Bulgaria divenne un Principato autonomo tributario dell’Impero ottomano ed il 16 aprile 1879 la Grande Assemblea nazionale approvò la c.d. Costituzione di Tărnovo1, la quale introduceva una monarchia parlamentare dualista2. Solo a seguito dell’insurrezione dei Giovani Turchi dell’estate del 1908, che indebolì profondamente l’Impero ottomano, la Bulgaria proclamò la propria indipendenza, il 5 ottobre 1908, ma mantenne la stessa Costituzione, che rimase in vigore fino al 19473. Nonostante sia stata sospesa più volte e sia stata in larga misura disapplicata nel periodo interbellico, la Costituzione di Tărnovo ha esercitato una profonda influenza sulla successiva evoluzione costituzionale del paese. Dopo essere entrata nel secondo conflitto mondiale a fianco della Germania nazista, con il colpo di Stato del 9 settembre 1944 del Fronte patriottico, guidato dai comunisti bulgari4 – e la successiva occupazione delle truppe sovietiche – la Bulgaria entrò nella sfera di influenza dell’Unione sovietica5.
    [Show full text]
  • Download/Print the Study in PDF Format
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN BULGARIA 12th May 2013 European Elections monitor Bulgaria: a second mandate for Boïko Borissov? Since the beginning of 2013 Bulgaria has been undergoing a violent political crisis. On 20th Februa- Corinne Deloy ry 2013, Bulgarian Prime Minister Boïko Borissov (Citizens for European Development of Bulgaria, Translated by Helen Levy GERB) resigned his position at the head of the government. Consequently parliamentary elections – held two months early since the vote was initially planned for early summer – have been called for 12th May. In spite of the protest movement, the outgoing Prime Minister’s party is ahead in all the opinion polls. It remains to be seen when it will be able to govern. Analysis Its vice-chairman, outgoing Interior Minister Tsvetan Tsvetanov has excluded the party from any «major» coalition with the Socialist Party (BSP) or an alliance with the extreme right-wing party, Ataka. He did not appear to be opposed to the idea of governing with the Rights and Freedoms Mo- vement (DPS) or with Bulgaria for Citizens, created by Meglena Kuneva. After the last parliamenta- ry elections on 5th July 2009, Boïko Borissov formed a minority government, comprising members of his party only, supported by other right-wing parties and the extreme right-wing party, Ataka. A total of 38 parties and 7 coalitions are in the running for the vote on 12th May. 242 observers from the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) will be present in the country to monitor proceedings. During the elections held on 23rd and 30th October 2011, the 21 observers present had ordered Bulgaria to improve its electoral process.
    [Show full text]
  • Анализи B Aromete R 1/2013 1
    The protests in the country have shown that the citizens’ discontent is not related only to high electricity prices – they are the cause of social tension, but not the reason for it. The problems are more complex and have to do with the overall poverty, unemployment, and the diminished trust of citizens in politicians and institutions. GERB is now in a new and unexpected situation, connected to the pre-election environment. High levels of unemployment, low incomes, the bankruptcy of hundreds of small and medium-sized enterprises, the existence of monopolies in a number of sectors of the economy, the poor results of the fight against corruption and organized crime are topics that will be addressed by the opposition during the campaign and answers will be required from GERB. The main challenge for BSP is whether it will manage to ride the wave of protests in the country. The demands of voters can be determined as left-wing, but what weighs on BSP at the moment is that many people determine it as a party of the status quo. Stanishev is making efforts to renew the party ranks, relying on new and young faces, while politicians of the transition remain in the background. From today’s point of view, it is hard to make a clear prediction on the outcome of the election. The protests in the country introduced a new element to the political situation. No one knows if and to what extent the protest vote of the citizens will go to some of the new formations, established by leaders of the protests, but there is potential for this.
    [Show full text]
  • Boyko Borisov (Boyko Metodievborisov)
    Boyko Borisov (Boyko MetodievBorisov) Bulgaria, Primer ministro (2º ejercicio) Duración del mandato: 07 de Noviembre de 2014 - En funciones Nacimiento: Bankya, Sofía, 13 de Junio de 1959 Partido político: GERB Profesión : Bombero, policía y guardaespaldas Resumen En 2009, por sexta vez consecutiva en casi dos décadas, las elecciones generales en Bulgaria castigaron a los partidos gobernantes y auparon al poder a una opción opositora que en esta ocasión presentaba unas características radicalmente singulares y novedosas. El triunfador y nuevo primer ministro, Boyko Borisov, con su pintoresco currículum de bombero, policía, guardaespaldas, karateka y futbolista, construyó desde 2001, en sus etapas de secretario de Estado del Interior en el Gobierno de su patrocinador en política, el ex rey Simeon, y alcalde de Sofía, un perfil carismático de hombre de acción enfrentado al crimen organizado y la corrupción. Líder de la formación centroderechista Ciudadanos por el Desarrollo Europeo de Bulgaria (GERB), Borisov solo necesitó tres años para noquear a los partidos tradicionales y coronar su vertiginosa carrera política. En su primer mandato, el dirigente conservador, revelado menos como un populista convencional que como un habilidoso autodidacta en las artes de seducir al electorado y administrar los tiempos políticos, aplicó medidas económicas ortodoxas de estabilidad monetaria y consolidación fiscal que consiguieron achicar el déficit público y dejaron a Bulgaria en una de las situaciones financieras más desahogadas del entorno, a la vez que
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 13 May 2013
    Issue 13 May 2013 8 May 2013 EXPAT CURRENCY BOARD WATCH EDITORIAL COMMENT 0º Bulgaria has gone back to normal Average A new caretaker government led by Marin Raykov is in place. It has already managed to calm down the country -45º Bad II.13 IV.13 Good +45º The cabinet looks fiscally conservative (good) but is unlikely to undertake major reforms (expected but not good) The transparency and fairness of the 12 May -90 º Dangerous Excellent +90º parliamentary elections is a key factor for the future OUTLOOK: STABLE political stability of the country We are not worried about the currency board and The financial outlook is now better than in February see no immediate danger of devaluation. Now that The caretaker government is by no means populist there is a pretty good caretaker government in place, and is far from a spending spree the country has calmed down. The major parties are The cabinet’s answer to the protests was a small committed to keeping the currency board. BGN41m social package. However, these are not new expenses but transfers from some sectors to others (good) Fiscal reserves have risen again to BGN5bn, partly GUEST COMMENTS due to some transfers from the EC (good) For the first time, we are making political comments BISER MANOLOV: EMOTIONS MAY CAUSE A LOT OF – still without taking sides TROUBLE Page 11 We are providing a brief analysis of the caretaker government (page 5) VESELA ILIEVA: ANALYSIS OF THE LUXURY REAL ESTATE MARKET IN BULGARIA We give 2 scenarios for the composition of the Page 12 future government: 1)
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia and Bulgaria Was Started in March 2006 Through a Joint Committee Session in Sofia Which Took the Task to Prepare the Project
    Milan Igrutinović BILATERAL RELATIONS AND OPEN ISSUES BETWEEN BULGARIA AND SERBIA IN THE CONTEXT OF SERBIA’S EU ACCESSION PROCESS CENTER FOR APPLIED EUROPEAN STUDIES 2017 INTRODUCTION A look at Serbian bilateral relations with its neighbors shows us that Bulgaria holds a position of one of three "old neighbors", a country that had a border and diplomatic relations with it before the collapse of the SFRY. Actually, diplomatic relations with Bulgaria reach further in the past than with any other country, and are a few months older than the ones with Romania, so we can say that Bulgaria is the "oldest" Serbian neighbor, if we measure it like this. Besides a similar position towards the Ottoman Empire and common heritage of gaining independence from it, two countries waged four wars in a 60-year span (1885-1944), all while changing border, alliances and foreign policy orientations. Still, in the period that we are looking at, which is present time, we can say that relations are sufficiently stable and cordial, that they open the way for further cooperation and that certain issues are being dealt with in reasonable and satisfactory way. In the following section we will briefly show a history of relations until 5 October 2000, that is to the end of period which, in its last phase, has been marked by the collapse of Yugoslavia and the international isolation, and then pay more attention to the relations after 2000 with a closer look at some more relevant topics of bilateral relations. * * * Serbian - Bulgarian diplomatic contacts have started right after the Berlin Congress of July 1878, when Serbian Principality gained international recognition of sovereignty and independence.
    [Show full text]