Tapestries: Interwoven voices of local and global identities Volume 5 Issue 1 Stories Untold: Subverted History, Article 3 Selected Narratives and the Politics of Memory 2016 Imperial Ethiopia: Conquest and the Case of National Articulation Hawi T. Tilahune Macalester College,
[email protected] Keywords: nation-state, state-building, nation-building, Charles Tilly, Karl Polanyi, cultural political economy, Ethiopia, culture Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/tapestries Recommended Citation Tilahune, Hawi T. (2016) "Imperial Ethiopia: Conquest and the Case of National Articulation," Tapestries: Interwoven voices of local and global identities: Vol. 5 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/tapestries/vol5/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the American Studies Department at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tapestries: Interwoven voices of local and global identities by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact
[email protected]. Imperial Ethiopia: Conquest and the Case of National Articulation By: Hawi Tilahune Introduction Much of the literature on state-building draws inspiration from the American sociologist Charles Tilly’s Bellicist perspective (Centeno 2002; Thies 2005). The bellicist account or the predatory theory speaks to the earlier European state-formation. In Tilly’s renowned aphorism: “War made the state, and the state made war” (quoted in Taylor and Botea 2008: 27). Based on an extensive and comprehensive historical analysis of modern European states, the Bellicist perspective presents war as the primary and central stimulus to building a centralized state apparatus (Thies 2009: 625).