Than Fish: Political Knowledge in the Commercial Fisheries of British Columbia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Than Fish: Political Knowledge in the Commercial Fisheries of British Columbia MORE THAN FISH: POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE IN THE COMMERCIAL FISHERIES OF BRITISH COLUMBIA by CAROLINE F. BUTLER B.A. McGill University, 1996 M.A. University of British Columbia, 1998 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES ANTHROPOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA JUNE 2005 ' Caroline F. Butler, 2005 Abstract Through ethnographic research based primarily in Prince Rupert, British Columbia, this dissertation explores the ecological and social significance of commercial fishers' political knowledge. Moving beyond the ecological thrust of local knowledge research, this ethnography emphasizes the material and political basis of fishers' perceptions and understandings. The study focuses on the politicized experience of commercial fishers in resource management contexts and the way in which their knowledge is constructed and positioned by power relations, resource competition, and economics. Analyzing a series of local knowledge encounters in the fishing industry of British Columbia - moments of conflict between competing knowledges over issues of conservation, co-management, and research - this dissertation reveals the significance of fishers' political knowledge in determining their fishing behaviour and their reactions to fisheries policy and to fisheries research. Fisheries regulation is explored as the defining force impacting livelihoods of fishers and shaping their knowledge, by structuring fishers' interaction with the environment, and with each other. This dissertation historicizes, problematizes, and differentiates local knowledge, emphasizing the entanglement of ecological and political knowledge as forms of knowledge that are implicated in the construction of each other. This dissertation argues for a more holistic approach to fisheries knowledge research, which does not focus only upon the ecological knowledge of resource users. Rather than only asking fishers what they know about fish, researchers must ask them about fisheries in order to explore and resolve the structural problems of human resource use. Table of Contents Abstract ii Table of Contents Hi List of Maps and Figures v List of Acronyms vi List of Terms vii Timeline of Key Events viii Preface ix Acknowledgements and Dedication xv Chapter 1: Understanding Knowledge 1 Alternative Knowledges 8 Local Political Knowledge 14 Chapter 2: Community Context and Research Methods 35 Prince Rupert and development dreams lost at sea 36 The Intricacies of the Fishing Industry 43 1. License Limitation 44 2. Area and Single-gear licensing in Salmon 46 5. Quota-based management 47 4. Biological Diversity and Risk Averse Management 48 7. Aboriginal Rights and Claims 50 Collaborators and Contributors: 52 A Week in the Life: Research in Practice 55 Research Methods 58 1. Formal Interviews 59 2. Text-based Research 61 3. Participant Observation 62 4. Informal interviews and conversation 63 Chapter 3: The Coho Crisis: conservation, allocation and the perceptions of a divided fleet 65 Biological concerns and risk averse management 66 Responses to the Coho Crisis 71 The Context of Competition 74 Perceptions of allocation 77 Fig. 3-1 Fishers' perceptions of reallocation 81 The Distribution and Differentiation of Fisheries Knowledge 83 Fig. 3-2 Knowledge differentiation 83 Conclusion 91 Chapter 4: The Rockfish Crisis: new types of fishing knowledge 95 A night out at the Crest 96 Local Knowledge and Biological Knowledge 100 The Rockfish Crisis and the development of an integrated groundfish fishery 106 The halibut fishery and the shift to quota 110 Transferability and the shift to "sharecropping" 113 Social and Economic Impacts of Quota 120 Practical and Ecological Impacts of Quota 123 in Creation of new knowledge 126 A case study of new fishing knowledge at work 129 Conclusion 135 Chapter 5: Broken Rulers and Pieces of String: Academic Models and Fishers' Realities 140 Back to the Future 141 Workshop Day 1: Conceptual Issues 144 TEK Interviews: Methodological Issues 148 The Workshop Day 2: Political Issues 157 What future do you want? The Restriction of Choices 162 Conclusions: The Politics of TEK Research 166 Chapter 6: Sockeye 2002: Political Knowledge and Scientific Management 177 Dire predictions and surprising returns 180 Fig. 6-1 2002 Pre-season estimates and escapement goals for Fraser Sockeye 181 In-season conflicts 183 Fig. 6-2 Commercial allocations of Fraser Sockeye 187 The View from the Grounds 188 Crisis management 190 Co-management Limitations 194 From Abundance to Allocation: The Shifting Focus of the Sockeye Conflict 198 From scientific models to moral authority 205 Chapter 7: COSEWIC and Knowledge Politics 211 COSEWIC and ecological knowledge 214 The politicization of ecological knowledge 221 The political limitations of ATK 229 The political implications of ATK 233 Conclusion 235 Chapter 8: Conclusion 238 Researching Knowledge 241 Understanding ecological and political knowledge 245 Knowledge and Regulation 250 The impacts of political knowledge 253 Interpreting Knowledge Encounters 259 More than Fish: Expanding Local Knowledge 262 Bibliography 268 Appendix 1 290 1. Species 290 2. Gear and Boat Size 291 3. Salmon Fishing Areas 292 iv List of Maps and Figures Figure 3-1 Fishers' Perceptions of Allocation 81 Figure 3-2 Knowledge Differentiation 84 Figure 6-1 2002 Preseason estimates and escapement goals Fraser Sockeye 181 Figure 6-2 Commercial Allocations of Fraser Sockeye 187 Map of Salmon Seine License Areas 293 Map of Salmon Gillnet License Areas 294 Map of Salmon Troll License Areas 295 Map of Research Area 296 v List of Acronyms AFS Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy ATK Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge BttF Back to the Future project COSEWIC Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada CPUE Catch Per Unit Effort DFO Department of Fisheries and Oceans (Canadian Federal Ministry) EI Employment Insurance FEK Fisher's Ecological Knowledge HBC Hudson Bay Company HRDC Human Resources Department of Canada FSC Fisheries Survival Coalition IFMP Integrated Fisheries Management Plan IK Indigenous Knowledge ITQ Individual Transferable Quota IVQ Individual Vessel Quota LEK Local Ecological Knowledge NB Native Brotherhood of British Columbia PK Practical Knowledge PHMA Pacific Halibut Management Association PRFCA Prince Rupert Fishermen's Cooperative Association PSC Pacific Salmon Commission QCI Queen Charlotte Islands RPA Rockfish Protection Area SARA Species At Risk Act SEK Social Ecological Knowledge TAC Total Allowable Catch - approved harvest for a fishery TED Turtle Excluder Device TEK Traditional Ecological Knowledge UFAWU United Fishermen and Allied Worker's Union List of Terms By-catch Non-target species caught incidentally during a fishery. Discards Fish discarded overboard during a fishery. Escapement Salmon which are allowed to escape harvest in order to spawn. Groundfish Fisheries category indicating bottom-feeding fish, including halibut, rockfish, and blackcod. Caught by hook and line, trap (blackcod), or trawl. By-catch Estimates of by-catch which die after discard. Used to determine mortality impacts of fisheries on non-target species. Rockfish Commonly called snappers, canaries, greenies, rock salmon or rockcod. In the waters of British Columbia there are 36 known species of rockfish belonging to the family Scorpanenidae. They are bottom-feeding fish and are distinguished by a stout, heavy build, large broad heads, usually bearing spines and strong ridges, and heavily-spined fins. Soak-time Length of time a gillnet or halibut longline is set in the water during fishing. For descriptions of fishing gear, please see appendix. vii Timeline of Key Events 1876 First cannery on the Skeena River. 1888 Commercial Halibut fishery begins in British Columbia. 1908 Prince Rupert is incorporated. 1923 International Pacific Halibut Commission established. 1931 Prince Rupert Fishermen's Co-operative Association established. 1969 Davis Plan: license limitation in salmon fisheries. 1977 Law of the Sea, 200 mile national fisheries jurisdiction. Canadian halibut boats out of Alaska. 1979 License limitation in halibut fishery. 1990 R. v. Sparrow establishes priority of Aboriginal food fisheries. 1991 Individual quotas introduced in halibut fishery. 1991/2 License limitation in rockfish fishery. 1994 Prince Rupert Fishermen's Cooperative Association dissolved. 1996 Mifflin Plan: Area licensing and gear-based licensing in salmon. Salmon license buyback. 1998 Coho conservation measures. Salmon license buyback. 2002 February: Rockfish conservation measures. 2002 August: Protest fisheries regarding salmon abundance. 2002 October: COSEWIC Emergency designation of Cultus Lake and Sakinaw Sockeye. 2003 R. v. Anderson: dismissal of charges against Area H protest fishers. 2004 R. v. Kapp appeal over-turned re. Aboriginal Fisheries Strategy. 2004 May: Joint Task Force on Post-Treaty Fisheries Report Released (McRae and Pearse) Preface My path to studying local knowledge in Prince Rupert was indirect, much like the highway route from Vancouver which must traverse inland, then north, and finally out to the coast again to reach the most northern coastal community in British Columbia. In 1997 I worked as a research assistant on a project investigating the involvement of the Tsimshian First Nation in the forest industry and thus received my introduction to territory of the Tsimshian and the city of Prince Rupert that lies within it. While asking Tsimshian people about their work in the forest
Recommended publications
  • British Columbia Regional Guide Cat
    National Marine Weather Guide British Columbia Regional Guide Cat. No. En56-240/3-2015E-PDF 978-1-100-25953-6 Terms of Usage Information contained in this publication or product may be reproduced, in part or in whole, and by any means, for personal or public non-commercial purposes, without charge or further permission, unless otherwise specified. You are asked to: • Exercise due diligence in ensuring the accuracy of the materials reproduced; • Indicate both the complete title of the materials reproduced, as well as the author organization; and • Indicate that the reproduction is a copy of an official work that is published by the Government of Canada and that the reproduction has not been produced in affiliation with or with the endorsement of the Government of Canada. Commercial reproduction and distribution is prohibited except with written permission from the author. For more information, please contact Environment Canada’s Inquiry Centre at 1-800-668-6767 (in Canada only) or 819-997-2800 or email to [email protected]. Disclaimer: Her Majesty is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in the reproduced material. Her Majesty shall at all times be indemnified and held harmless against any and all claims whatsoever arising out of negligence or other fault in the use of the information contained in this publication or product. Photo credits Cover Left: Chris Gibbons Cover Center: Chris Gibbons Cover Right: Ed Goski Page I: Ed Goski Page II: top left - Chris Gibbons, top right - Matt MacDonald, bottom - André Besson Page VI: Chris Gibbons Page 1: Chris Gibbons Page 5: Lisa West Page 8: Matt MacDonald Page 13: André Besson Page 15: Chris Gibbons Page 42: Lisa West Page 49: Chris Gibbons Page 119: Lisa West Page 138: Matt MacDonald Page 142: Matt MacDonald Acknowledgments Without the works of Owen Lange, this chapter would not have been possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Quotas Private Property Solutions to Overfishing
    Beyond Quotas Private Property Solutions to Overfishing ELIZABETH BRUBAKER In March 1996, Glen Clark, the premier of British Columbia, pre- dicted that the Fraser River commercial sockeye fishery would be shut down for the year. “It’s pretty clear from the numbers,” he explained, “that it won’t sustain a commercial fishery” (Cernetig 1996a). The warning followed two nearly disastrous years in Brit- ish Columbia’s salmon fishery. In 1994, several million Fraser Riv- er salmon failed to appear at their spawning grounds. The board reviewing their disappearance concluded that fishermen had come within 12 hours of wiping out the province’s most impor- tant sockeye run. “The resource is now, more than ever before, critically endangered,” it warned. “If something like the 1994 sit- uation happens again, the door to disaster will be wide open” (Fraser River Sockeye Public Review Board [FRSPRB] 1995: xii, 12). Academics agreed that a crisis loomed. Biologist Carl Walters cautioned that, in the absence of profound restructuring, the Pa- cific salmon fishery would likely go the way of the Atlantic cod fishery (Walters 1995: 4). The following season again saw salmon shortages. In August 1995, with the returning salmon numbering two-thirds less than pre-season estimates, federal Fisheries Minister Brian Tobin closed the Fraser River sockeye fishery with a grim comment: “As it stands now, we don’t have a fishery. Period. And unless the 151 Fish or Cut Bait! numbers change, we won’t have a fishery in the future” (Damsell 1995). In a news release on November 8, 1995, British Columbia’s fisheries minister, David Zirnhelt, described the year’s salmon returns as “the worst in memory,” noting that harvest volumes had declined 42 percent from recent averages (Valhalla 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Gitxaała Use and Occupancy in the Area of the Proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline Tanker Routes
    Gitxaała Use and Occupancy in the area of the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline Tanker Routes Prepared on behalf of Gitxaała Nation Charles R. Menzies, PhD December 18, 2011 Table of Contents Gitxaała Use and Occupancy in the area of the proposed Northern Gateway Pipeline Tanker Routes......................................................................................................... 0 1. Qualifications.................................................................................................................................2 2. Major sources of knowledge with respect to Gitxaała .....................................................3 3. The transmission of Gitxaala oral history, culture, language and knowledge ........6 3.1 Basis of evidence......................................................................................................................................6 3.2 Oral history and the transmission of narratives ........................................................................7 4. An overview of the early history of contact between Europeans and the Gitxaała. .............................................................................................................................................................. 10 5. An Ethnographic Description of Gitxaała.......................................................................... 11 5.1 Gitxaała Language ................................................................................................................................ 11 5.2 Social organization
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, April 29, 1994
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 060 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, April 29, 1994 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, April 29, 1994 The House met at 10 a.m. showed that Canadians had lost complete faith in its approach to the situation. _______________ Because of the magnitude of Pearson airport and because it was the only profitable airport in the country, the Conservatives Prayers decided they would take a different approach. They entered into negotiations which were behind the scenes and not public tender _______________ to lease, sell and give away property belonging to the taxpayers. It seems ironic they would choose their friends and those of GOVERNMENT ORDERS other political parties to come forth and negotiate with the government behind the scenes. The agreement would allow them to take charge of one of the prime federal assets in this [English] country, hundreds of acres of property close to downtown Toronto. They would have a sweetheart lease on it for many PEARSON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AGREEMENTS years which guaranteed them income, all at the taxpayers’ ACT expense. The House resumed from April 26 consideration of the motion When the situation blew up in their faces during the last that Bill C–22, an act respecting certain agreements concerning election this government decided it was time to do something the redevelopment and operation of terminals 1 and 2 at Lester about it and said to stop the deal from going forward. Of course B. Pearson International airport, be read the second time and the government did not heed the cries and concerns of the referred to a committee; and of the amendment; and of the electorate and the last government in its dying days signed a amendment to the amendment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008. Prince Rupert Harbour. Report
    Report on Gitxaała Use and Occupancy of the Area Now Known as Prince Rupert Harbour with specific reference to the site of the Prince Rupert Container Port Development. Prepared by: Charles R. Menzies, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Anthropology Department of Anthropology The University of British Columbia September 19, 2008 Table of Contents Report on Gitxaała Use and Occupancy of the Area Now Known as Prince Rupert Harbour with specific reference to the site of the Prince Rupert Container Port Development. ................................................................................................................. 0 Qualifications ................................................................................................................. 2 Gitxaała –A North Coast Aboriginal People.................................................................... 2 Social Organization of the Gitxaała............................................................................. 5 The Continuance of Gitxaała as a Community and a People........................................ 7 Key Findings in Relation to Gitxaała Use and Occupancy with Specific Reference to Prince Rupert Harbour.................................................................................................... 9 1. Archaeological Data................................................................................................ 9 Summary of Archaeological Sequence of Prince Rupert Harbour...........................10 Discussion of Prince Rupert Harbour Archaeological Evidence..............................25
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, June 21, 1995
    VOLUME 133 NUMBER 223 1st SESSION 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, June 21, 1995 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, June 21, 1995 The House met at 2 p.m. industry’s viability, the government chose to let the investment climate deteriorate. _______________ We must make sure that our mining sector will be able to Prayers develop in the future and continue to create thousands of jobs in Quebec and Canada instead of abroad. _______________ * * * STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS [English] [English] NATURAL RESOURCES HIRE A STUDENT WEEK Mr. George S. Rideout (Moncton, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, as the committee on natural resources requested during the examina- Mrs. Georgette Sheridan (Saskatoon—Humboldt, Lib.): tion of the Department of National Resources Act, the Minister Mr. Speaker, the Canada employment centre for students is of Natural Resources tabled this morning the fifth annual report celebrating its annual hire a student week across Canada, June to Parliament, ‘‘The State of Canada’s Forests, 1994’’. 19 to 23. Canada’s forests continue to be a major engine of economic The goal of hire a student week is to gain support from growth for Canada, particularly in certain regions of the country potential employers and to heighten awareness of the services such as my home province of New Brunswick, but they are also available through the Canada employment centre for students in essential to our environment. Saskatoon as well as in other parts of the country. The theme of this year’s report, ‘‘A Balancing Act’’, de- People will notice the hire a student buttons being worn by scribes the challenges of maintaining timber for our industry students at the events planned to celebrate this week.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, December 4, 1996
    CANADA VOLUME 134 S NUMBER 113 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, December 4, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 7077 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, December 4, 1996 The House met at 2 p.m. [Translation] _______________ ANTONIO GREDIAGA KIEFF Mrs. Pierrette Venne (Saint-Hubert, BQ): Mr. Speaker, the Prayers renowned artist Antonio Grediaga Kieff recently very kindly gave the town of Saint-Bruno-de-Montarville one of his sculptures. _______________ This modern work entitled ‘‘Totem ’85 with Spirals and The Speaker: Every so often we have an opportunity to hear Triangles’’ is the first piece of outdoor art to be set up around the some truly magnificent Canadian voices. We are going to add our town. The sculpture, which is bronze and valued at $160,000 on the voices to theirs. I have asked the St. Michael’s Boys Choir to lead international art market, measures 5 metres high and weighs a little us in our national anthem. I know that an hon. member should have over a tonne. led us today, but perhaps next week he will lead us. If the choir is ready, I invite them to lead us in our national anthem. Mr. Kieff’s sculptures may be found in major art collections around the world. Two former American Presidents, Ronald Rea- [Editor’s Note: Whereupon the national anthem was sung.] gan and Jimmy Carter, are proud owners of his works.
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, April 24, 1996
    CANADA VOLUME 134 S NUMBER 032 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, April 24, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1883 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, April 24, 1996 The House met at 2 p.m. [English] _______________ LIBERAL PARTY OF CANADA Prayers Mr. Ken Epp (Elk Island, Ref.): Mr. Speaker, voters need accurate information to make wise decisions at election time. With _______________ one vote they are asked to choose their member of Parliament, select the government for the term, indirectly choose the Prime The Speaker: As is our practice on Wednesdays, we will now Minister and give their approval to a complete all or nothing list of sing O Canada, which will be led by the hon. member for agenda items. Vancouver East. During an election campaign it is not acceptable to say that the [Editor’s Note: Whereupon members sang the national anthem.] GST will be axed with pledges to resign if it is not, to write in small print that it will be harmonized, but to keep it and hide it once the _____________________________________________ election has been won. It is not acceptable to promise more free votes if all this means is that the status quo of free votes on private members’ bills will be maintained. It is not acceptable to say that STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS MPs will be given more authority to represent their constituents if it means nothing and that MPs will still be whipped into submis- [English] sion by threats and actions of expulsion.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeena River Estuary Juvenile Salmon Habitat
    Skeena River Estuary Juvenile Salmon Habitat May 21, 2014 Research carried out by Ocean Ecology 1662 Parmenter Ave. Prince Rupert, BC V8J 4R3 Telephone: (250) 622-2501 Email: [email protected] Skeena River Estuary Skeena River Estuary Juvenile Salmon Habitat Skeena Wild Conservation Trust 4505 Greig Avenue Terrace, B.C. V8G 1M6 and Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition PO Box 70 Hazelton, B.C. V0J 1Y0 Prepared by: Ocean Ecology Cover photo: Brian Huntington Ocean Ecology Skeena River Estuary Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. ii List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. iii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... vi 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Chatham Sound ................................................................................................................ 7 1.2 Skeena River Estuary ..................................................................................................... 10 1.3 Environmental Concerns ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wednesday, May 8, 1996
    CANADA VOLUME 134 S NUMBER 042 S 2nd SESSION S 35th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, May 8, 1996 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) OFFICIAL REPORT At page 2437 of Hansard Tuesday, May 7, 1996, under the heading ``Report of Auditor General'', the last paragraph should have started with Hon. Jane Stewart (Minister of National Revenue, Lib.): The House of Commons Debates are also available on the Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2471 HOUSE OF COMMONS Wednesday, May 8, 1996 The House met at 2 p.m. [Translation] _______________ COAST GUARD Prayers Mrs. Christiane Gagnon (Québec, BQ): Mr. Speaker, another _______________ voice has been added to the general vehement objections to the Coast Guard fees the government is preparing to ram through. The Acting Speaker (Mr. Kilger): As is our practice on Wednesdays, we will now sing O Canada, which will be led by the The Quebec urban community, which is directly affected, on hon. member for for Victoria—Haliburton. April 23 unanimously adopted a resolution demanding that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans reverse its decision and carry [Editor’s Note: Whereupon members sang the national anthem.] out an in depth assessment of the economic impact of the various _____________________________________________ options. I am asking the government to halt this direct assault against the STATEMENTS BY MEMBERS Quebec economy. I am asking the government to listen to the taxpayers, the municipal authorities and the economic stakehold- [English] ers. Perhaps an equitable solution can then be found.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration of the Kitsumkalum Indian Band of the Tsimshian Nation of Aboriginal Title and Rights to Prince Rupert Harbour and Surrounding Coastal Areas
    DECLARATION OF THE KITSUMKALUM INDIAN BAND OF THE TSIMSHIAN NATION OF ABORIGINAL TITLE AND RIGHTS TO PRINCE RUPERT HARBOUR AND SURROUNDING COASTAL AREAS I. Introduction This declaration is made by the Elected and Hereditary Chiefs of the Kitsumkalum Indian Band (“Kitsumkalum”) on behalf of all Kitsumkalum. Kitsumkalum is a strong, proud part of the Tsimshian Nation. We take exception to attempts to deny us our rightful place within the Tsimshian Nation, and to deny us our rightful place on the coast, with its sites and resources that are an integral part of who we are. This denial is more than an attempt to separate us from our lands and resources, it is an assault on who we are as people. We are supposed to be moving forward with Canada and British Columbia in a spirit of recognition and reconciliation. Instead, we are met with denial and resistance. In this declaration, we once again assert who we are and what is ours. We are a part of the Tsimshian Nation that exclusively occupied the Prince Rupert Harbour and surrounding coastal and inland areas prior to and as of 1846. Within that area, we hold exclusive ownership over and responsibity for specific sites in accordance with ayaawx, Tsimshian Law. We have aboriginal rights to fish, harvest, gather and engage in cultural and spiritual activities throughout the coastal part of our territory. There is much at stake – in particular with a Liquefied Natural Gas (“LNG”) industry at our doorstep. It is only through recognition on the part of Canada and British Columbia of our rights and title and an acknowledgement of your legal obligations to consult meaningfully with us that we can move forward in a spirit of mutual respect and work to achieve results for our mutual benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday, April 30, 1999
    CANADA VOLUME 135 S NUMBER 219 S 1st SESSION S 36th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, April 30, 1999 Speaker: The Honourable Gilbert Parent CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire'' at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 14527 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, April 30, 1999 The House met at 10 a.m. [Translation] _______________ This year is the fourth anniversary of the Open Skies Agreement and the 25th anniversary of the 1974 Air Transport Preclearance Agreement. Prayers These two agreements have worked hand in glove to transform _______________ air passenger travel between Canada and the United States. [English] In the past, travelling from Canada to the United States was long GOVERNMENT ORDERS and arduous because the airlines were often prevented from providing efficient routings by the outdated air agreement. Because of open skies, some 60 U.S. destinations can now be reached D (1005 ) non-stop from 19 Canadian cities and many more can be reached [English] by convenient connections at U.S. hubs. D (1010 ) PRECLEARANCE ACT Parenthetically, I should point out that in transporter traffic, Hon. David M. Collenette (for the Minister of Foreign since the open skies agreement has come in, Canadian carriers Affairs) moved that Bill S-22, an act authorizing the United States dominate that market. Canadian carriers carry more passengers in to preclear travellers and goods in Canada for entry into the United the transporter market than do U.S. carriers. That is a testament to States for the purposes of customs, immigration, public health, the efficiency of Canada’s various airlines.
    [Show full text]