The Ancestry of Trout

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Ancestry of Trout TLre ancestry tf trout T that all species in that genus came from one classificatio",,",."**i,)'T:ffi:J 1T;1 common ancestral species. But we lack ur: tionary evidence in an attempt to arrange ambiguous criteria and all-encompassir: species on a family tree to denote branching definitions of the categories of classification points and degrees of evolutionary relation- Thus, a "lumper" may recognize two or threr ships. Tfaditionally, we have relied on skeletal species in a genus. A "splitter," using the sane features, anatomical characteristics, and the evidence but with different emphasis, mryi: type and arrangement of teeth for evidence. classify these same fish as two or three sub- Now, we also use more modern methods: species of one species. counting chromosomes, studying protein Controversies and disagreements regardin r patterns, and analyzing DNA. what classification scheme best reflects er-oiu- We assume that a change in a character, tionary relationships, or phylogenies, ari."e such as presence or absence of teeth on a from the fact that if the evidence used u. certain bone or on a particular part of a bone, inconclusive, it is open to individual interpre- denotes a branching sequence on the family tation. For example, the significance anc tree. Branching sequences then can be ar- magnitude of evolutionary divergence ,le- ranged in a system of classification by de- noted by a change in the size or shape of ; scending orders of relatedness. For example, bone, a change in chromosome number- the outer terminal twigs on the tree represent or a change in protein patterns might reflect living species, which are traced to a common a major branching classified as a genus or a stem branch that groups closely related branching of a lesser magnitude denotrnE species into a genus. Further down the tree, a species or even a subspecies. representing more ancient periods on the A primitive condition and an advanced o: geological time scale, branches of genera join derived condition must be established fbr to form subfamilies. Finally, the base of the each character. Otherwise the use of an)-' trunk represents the family. change in that character to denote the se- quence of branches is open to interpretation- Luuppns AND sPLrrrERS There is general agreement among modern Trrp raurr,Y TREB taxonomists that classification should reflect Uncertainry is prevalent when we try ro evolutionary relationships. That is, all species reconstmct the lineage ofthe family Salmoru- in the same genus should be more closely dae, because the fossil record is sparse and related to each other than to any species in contains large gaps. We rely on interpreta- other genera. And when we recognize a tions of the evidence from the characters u'c genus as a valid genus) we assume or denote use for classification. Tnor-r 3 SUBFAMILY GENUS SUBGENUS SPECIES z (,r r hen N gotbwcba nzrha tshawytvha hisutch m4301t Anrmhrwhus mlbiss Rainbow, cutthroat trout clarhi (Rh db drfarh or Pams a lnn ) tila chrysogaster salar trutta. .ischchon bmica matmmntus platycEhalus Salmoninae (Plnrysalrno) ohrilnnus -{lthough the oldest known salmonid fos- Acantholitgun :1. Eosalrno d.riftwoofunsis of British Colum- obtusirostris :ia. represents a species living about 45 to 50 Salmothlmus zetensis :rillion years ago, the origin of the family bwh :robably is much older, perhaps on the mag- Bmchymysaa saviwvi :rrude of 100 million years. We base this nature of the Huchen or rrimen (IIwho) Lisumption on the primitive hwho iieietal and anatomical characters of salmo- petYy, rd fishes in relation to other groups of mod- (Pamhurho) we have :rn bony (teleostean) fishes. What (Cristivomer) ,-arned from Eosohno fossils indicates that the rwrnaycush --:ree subfamilies of Salmonidae- Coregoni- (Bainw) fonrha.lis Chars &.lvehnus aae (the whitefishes), Thymallinae (gray- albus (&ltelinus) confhenws --ngs), and Salmoninae (trout, salmon, and ::rar)-were already separated from each bucomacnis malma . rher 50 million years ago. A g"p in the fossil nlpinus ::cord of about 25 million to 30 million years and others ccurs between the Eocene and Miocene Although all subfamily mem- :ns. Miocene fossils found in the western bers share certain physical also difer - nited States reveal that several major evolu- characteristics, they Jrom one another These --rnxrf branches of the subfamily Salmoni- kingdom Animalia (animals) diferences sepdrate them into :r.e were established by this time. These ex- phylum Chordata (animals with notochords and distinct gener a, sub gene r a, hollow nerve cords) :nct, fossil species represent the same genera species, and subspecies. Pacifc (animals backbones) subphylum Vertebrata with s almon ( genus O nc orhy nchus), species of trout, salmon, -: l'hich the living class Osteichthes (bony fishes) Atlantic salmon (Salmo) and :rd char are classified. Evidently, the first order Salmonifirrrnes (fishes with soft-rayed fins, chars (Salvelinus) are all clas' rajor branching, or divergence, leading to all adipose fins, and abdominal pelvic fins) sifed as Salmoninae subfamily (trout, salmon, char, whitefish, members in the species of trout, salmon, and char, is family Salmonidae family -',ing gnylings) Salmonidae, based on certain ;:naracterized by a loss ofteeth on the shaft of subfamily Salmoninae (trout, salmon, and char) phy sical similar itie s a mon g --:le vomer bone in the roof ofthe mouth and genera Owmhychus (hooked snout) them. They are further taxo- :.r a peculiar modification of lateral-line Solnn (silmon) n omic ally s ep dr ate d into Salvelinws (dwelling in springs) distinct gener 4, sub ge n er a, One branch leads to the chars of the -ales. species ryhiss, trula, fintinalis, etc. species and subspecies, on the !:nus Snlvelinus and also includes the lenok subspecies bwisi, boraieri, henshawi, etc. basis of the diferences among .: Siberia (genus Brailyrnystax) and Eurasian them. .:uchen (the largest living species of Salmoni- of the genus Hwcho). The other branch "e. trl-Har e Tnour Is 3 a E Although originally limited to of this divergence leads to the living species of subfamilies. We do not know whether this th e n or thern hemisph er e, trout and salmon. By the middle of the Mio- most ancient ancestor was freshwatcr Salmonid,s haye been success- a fully introduced into m(my cene period, the trout and salmon branch species or a marine species. AII species of parts of the southern hemi- forked again, resulting in two major groups. Salmonidae must spawn in fresh water. sphere. They inhabit cool and In the North Pacific basin of North America which would indicate a freshwater origin. cold waters; the Arctic char, a and Asia, one branch subdivided into two species member oJ the family, occurs But most also have the physiological further north than any other main evolutionary lines, one leading to capability to live in the ocean, which suggests freshwater ftsh. species of Pacific Salmon, the other to rain- that the ability to excrete salts and retain bow and cutthroat trout-all now classified water) necessary to survival in marine waters) in the genus Oncorhynchas. In the North At- has been inherited from an ancient ancestor. lantic basin of Europe, branchings of the There are some little-known, troutlike Sahno line gave rise to Atlantic salmon and species whose correct positions on the family brown trout and related species. tree are largely unknown, except that their The evolutionary line that developed per- branches belongin the subfamily Salmoninae haps I00 million years ago resulting in all of part of the tree. A peculiar species (probabll' the present species of trout, salmon, char, two species) classified in the genus Salrnothy- whitefishes, and graylings probably began lnus occ'Jrs in a few rivers on the Adriatic when the chromosome number doubled in a coast of Yugoslavia. The generic name im- common ancestral species. The chromo- plies that this fish originally was thought to somes of all species of the family Salmonidae be intermediate between trout (genus Snlrno contain about rwice the amount of DNA ofsubfamily Salmoninae) and gray'ing (genus found in related families such as the smelt Thyrnallws of subfamily Thymallinae). There family, Osmeridae. This indicates that the is no doubt that Snbnothywtws is a trout (sub- character change in the chromosomes of a family Salmoninae), but where its branching primitive ancestor occurred before the evolu- point joins the tree in relation to the Onco- tionary separation of the family into three rhynchws and Salyno branches is not clear. 4 Tnour 3a-sed on my interpretation of the evidence, In the genus SDbnl,I include six species of itituothyrnws should be connected to the varyrng degrees of relatedness. If the Tirrkish i"rinn branch. But others may disagee and ftotrt Plntysa.lwn platycephnlus is included as :-ace it further down the tree connecting to a one of the six species, there are three "good" . r*tnon ancestral stem before the separation species hghly divergent from one another- ,: rhis stem into Salm.o and Oncorhywhws. the Atlantic salmon, S. salor; the brown \nother species of dubious relationship trout, S. tn'r.ttn; and the Turkish trout, S. (P.) .,..urs onlyin Lake Ohrid, Yugoslavia, and is platycephalws. The other three recognized :-assified in the genus Acantholingon. This species are closely related to brown trout. In .:ecies formerly was classified in the genus some rivers tributary to the Adriatic Sea, the t'ritrntltyrnus, but there is little doubt that marbled trout) S. ma.rrnotatus, occurs. The -:;anthol'ingunshould be recognized as a sepa- marbled trout is a large predaceous fish reach- ::.re genus. Acantholhgcn ohridanws has a rng 23 kilograms (50 pounds) or more. Its .:leltlike appearance and has the most primi- coloration and markings differ greatly from :-!'e type of skeletal characters and dentition those of other species of Sahno.
Recommended publications
  • Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic
    water Review Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic Valentina S. Artamonova 1, Ivan N. Bolotov 2,3,4, Maxim V. Vinarski 4 and Alexander A. Makhrov 1,4,* 1 A. N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Phylogenetics, Northern Arctic Federal University, 163002 Arkhangelsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia 4 Laboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Analysis of zoogeographic, paleogeographic, and molecular data has shown that the ancestors of many fresh- and brackish-water cold-tolerant hydrobionts of the Mediterranean region and the Danube River basin likely originated in East Asia or Central Asia. The fish genera Gasterosteus, Hucho, Oxynoemacheilus, Salmo, and Schizothorax are examples of these groups among vertebrates, and the genera Magnibursatus (Trematoda), Margaritifera, Potomida, Microcondylaea, Leguminaia, Unio (Mollusca), and Phagocata (Planaria), among invertebrates. There is reason to believe that their ancestors spread to Europe through the Paratethys (or the proto-Paratethys basin that preceded it), where intense speciation took place and new genera of aquatic organisms arose. Some of the forms that originated in the Paratethys colonized the Mediterranean, and overwhelming data indicate that Citation: Artamonova, V.S.; Bolotov, representatives of the genera Salmo, Caspiomyzon, and Ecrobia migrated during the Miocene from I.N.; Vinarski, M.V.; Makhrov, A.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Isolation and Characterization of Brachymystax Lenok Microsatellite Loci and Cross-Species Amplification in Hucho Spp
    Molecular Ecology Notes (2004) 4, 150–152 doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00594.x PRIMERBlackwell Publishing, Ltd. NOTE Isolation and characterization of Brachymystax lenok microsatellite loci and cross-species amplification in Hucho spp. and Parahucho perryi E. FROUFE,*† K. M. SEFC,‡ P. ALEXANDRINO*† and S. WEISS‡ *CIBIO/UP, Campus Agrário de Vairão, 4480–661, Vairão, Portugal, †Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade do Porto, Praça Gomes Teixeira, 4009–002 Porto, Portugal, ‡Karl-Franzens University Graz, Institute of Zoology, Universitätsplatz 2, A-8010 Graz, Austria Abstract We isolated and characterized eight polymorphic microsatellite markers for Brachymystax lenok (Pallas, 1773) from genomic libraries enriched for (GATA)n, (GACA)n and (ATG)n microsatellites. The number of alleles per locus ranged from two to 17. Heterozygosity ranged from 0.2 to 0.95. In addition, cross-species amplification was successful for seven loci in Hucho hucho, eight in H. taimen and seven in Parahucho perryi. Keywords: Brachymystax lenok, Hucho hucho, Hucho taimen, microsatellite, Parahucho perryi, Salmonids Received 29 October 2003; revision accepted 12 December 2003 Brachymystax lenok is a freshwater resident salmonid present and fragments in a size range of 500–1000 bp were isolated throughout eastern Siberia and portions of northern from a 2% agarose gel using the Nucleospin kit (BD Mongolia, China and Korea. Despite its wide distribution, Biosciences, Clonetech). Oligonucleotide adaptors (RBgl24, populations of this species are currently declining through 5′-AGCACTCTCCAGCCTCTCACCGCA-3′, and RBgl12, overexploitation, environmental pollution and other causes, 5′-GATCTGCGGTGA-3′) were ligated to the genomic DNA and information about them is still very scarce. Currently, fragments using T4 DNA ligase (Promega) overnight at two forms of lenok are distinguished — blunt and sharp- 4 °C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Arctic Char (Salvelinus Alpinus) “Complex” in North America Revisited
    The Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) “complex” in North America revisited Eric B. Taylor Hydrobiologia The International Journal of Aquatic Sciences ISSN 0018-8158 Hydrobiologia DOI 10.1007/s10750-015-2613-6 1 23 Author's personal copy Hydrobiologia DOI 10.1007/s10750-015-2613-6 CHARR II Review Paper The Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) ‘‘complex’’ in North America revisited Eric B. Taylor Received: 1 July 2015 / Revised: 16 November 2015 / Accepted: 5 December 2015 Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015 Abstract The Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus) law. This research has significantly revised what species ‘‘complex’’ has fascinated biologists for constitutes the S. alpinus species ‘‘complex’’, provided decades particularly with respect to how many species insights into the ecology and genetics of co-existence, there are and their geographic distributions. I review and promoted conservation assessment that better recent research on the species complex, focussing on represents biodiversity within Salvelinus. A geograph- biodiversity within northwestern North America, ically and genetically comprehensive analysis of which indicates (i) what was once considered a single relationships among putative taxa of Pan-Pacific taxon consists of three taxa: S. alpinus (Arctic char), S. Salvelinus is still required to better quantify the malma (Dolly Varden), and S. confluentus (bull trout), number of taxa and their origins. (ii) morphological and genetic data indicate that S. alpinus and S. malma, and S. malma and S. confluentus Keywords Dolly Varden Á Arctic char Á Bull trout Á exist as distinct biological species in sympatry, (iii) Geographic distribution Á Taxonomy Á Conservation sympatric forms of S. alpinus exist in Alaska as in other areas of the Holarctic, (iv) Dolly Varden comprises two well-differentiated subspecies, S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromosomal Study of the Lenoks, Brachymystax(Salmoniformes
    Journal of Species Research 2(1):91-98, 2013 Chromosomal study of the lenoks, Brachymystax (Salmoniformes, Salmonidae) from the South of the Russian Far East I.V. Kartavtseva*, L.K. Ginatulina, G.A. Nemkova and S.V. Shedko Institute of Biology and Soil Science of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Prospect 100 let Vladivostoku 159, Vladivostok 690022 *Correspondent: [email protected], [email protected] An investigation of the karyotypes of two species of the genus Brachymystax (B. lenok and B. tumensis) has been done for the Russia Primorye rivers running to the East Sea basin, and others belonging to Amur basin. Based on the analysis of two species chromosome characteristics, combined with original and literary data, four cytotypes have been described. One of these cytotypes (Cytotype I: 2n=90, NF=110-118) was the most common. This common cytotype belongs to B. tumensis from the rivers of the East Sea basin and B. lenok from the rivers of the Amur basin, i.e. extends to the zones of allopatry. In the rivers of the Amur river basin, in the zone of the sympatric habitat of two species, each taxon has karyotypes with different chromosome numbers, B. tumensis (2n=92) and B. lenok (2n=90). Because of the ability to determine a number of the chromosome arms for these two species, additional cytotype have been identified for B. tum- ensis: Cytotype II with 2n=92, NF=110-124 in the rivers basins of the Yellow sea and Amur river and for B. lenok three cytotypes: Cytotype I: 2n=90, NF=110 in the Amur river basin; Cytotype III with 2n=90, NF=106-126 in the Amur river basin and Cytotypes IV with 2n=92, NF=102 in the Baikal lake.
    [Show full text]
  • California Golden Trout Chances for Survival: Poor 2 Oncorhynchus Mykiss Aguabonita
    California Golden Trout chances for survival: poor 2 Oncorhynchus mykiss aguabonita alifornia golden trout, the official state fish, is one of three species disTriBuTion: California golden trout are endemic to imple mented. major efforts have been made to create refugia 1 2 3 4 5 TROUT south Fork Kern river and to Golden trout Creek. they for golden trout in the upper reaches of the south Fork Kern of brilliantly colored trout native to the upper Kern river basin; the have been introduced into many other lakes and creeks in river by constructing barriers and then applying the poison others are the little Kern golden trout and Kern river rainbow trout. and outside of California, including the Cottonwood lakes rotenone to kill all unwanted fish above barriers. Despite California Golden Trout Were not far from the headwaters of Golden trout Creek and into these and other efforts, most populations of California golden Historically Present in South Fork Kern C Basin, Part Of The Upper Kern River California golden trout evolved in streams of the southern sierra Nevada the headwaters of south Fork Kern river, such as mulkey trout are hybridized and are under continual threat from Basin Shown Here Creek. the Cottonwood lakes have been a source of golden brown trout invasions. management actions are needed to mountains, at elevations above 7,500 feet. the Kern plateau is broad and flat, trout eggs for stocking other waters and are still used for address threats to California golden trout which include with wide meadows and meandering streams. the streams are small, shallow, stocking lakes in Fresno and tulare Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Edna Assay Development
    Environmental DNA assays available for species detection via qPCR analysis at the U.S.D.A Forest Service National Genomics Center for Wildlife and Fish Conservation (NGC). Asterisks indicate the assay was designed at the NGC. This list was last updated in June 2021 and is subject to change. Please contact [email protected] with questions. Family Species Common name Ready for use? Mustelidae Martes americana, Martes caurina American and Pacific marten* Y Castoridae Castor canadensis American beaver Y Ranidae Lithobates catesbeianus American bullfrog Y Cinclidae Cinclus mexicanus American dipper* N Anguillidae Anguilla rostrata American eel Y Soricidae Sorex palustris American water shrew* N Salmonidae Oncorhynchus clarkii ssp Any cutthroat trout* N Petromyzontidae Lampetra spp. Any Lampetra* Y Salmonidae Salmonidae Any salmonid* Y Cottidae Cottidae Any sculpin* Y Salmonidae Thymallus arcticus Arctic grayling* Y Cyrenidae Corbicula fluminea Asian clam* N Salmonidae Salmo salar Atlantic Salmon Y Lymnaeidae Radix auricularia Big-eared radix* N Cyprinidae Mylopharyngodon piceus Black carp N Ictaluridae Ameiurus melas Black Bullhead* N Catostomidae Cycleptus elongatus Blue Sucker* N Cichlidae Oreochromis aureus Blue tilapia* N Catostomidae Catostomus discobolus Bluehead sucker* N Catostomidae Catostomus virescens Bluehead sucker* Y Felidae Lynx rufus Bobcat* Y Hylidae Pseudocris maculata Boreal chorus frog N Hydrocharitaceae Egeria densa Brazilian elodea N Salmonidae Salvelinus fontinalis Brook trout* Y Colubridae Boiga irregularis Brown tree snake*
    [Show full text]
  • Sport-Fish-Identification.Pdf
    Walleye Walleye have two distinct fins on their back, the first with large spines. Lake Sturgeon They have a yellow-olive back, brassy, silvery sides with yellow spots, a white underside, and white on the lower lobe of the tail. Dusky vertical Lake Sturgeon are a Threatened Species due to population size and bars are often found on the body as well. concerns with viability. Lake Sturgeon have a large brown or grey body covered with tough, leather- like tissue and five rows of bony plates. They have a shark-like, upturned tail and a pointed snout with four barbels. Sauger Lake Whitefish are olive-green to blue on the back, with silvery sides.They Sauger are a Threatened Species due to hybridization, habitat Lakehave a small Whitefish mouth below a rounded snout, and a deeply forked tail. degradation and overharvest. Sauger are golden olive on the back with silver-yellow sides and a white underside. They also have a large spiny dorsal fin, distinct rows of spots on the dorsal fins and three or four dusky vertical bars on the body. Mountain Whitefish have large scales, no spots and small mouths with no Burbot Mountainteeth. Their general Whitefish body colour is a bronze-white or greenish white. Burbot have a slim, brownish black body with smooth skin, a flattened head, and a fin that stretches along the back half of the body. Distinctive barbels hang from the lower jaw and nostrils. Goldeye Northern Pike Goldeye have prominent eyes with bright yellow pupils, a blunt head, and Northern Pike are a long, slender fish with duck-like jaws and a long, flat a deep, compressed body.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Trout Waters of California Details Six of the State’S Most Scenic, Diverse, and Significant Native Trout Fisheries
    NATIVE TROUT WATERS OF CALIFORNIA Michael Carl The Ecological Angler www.ecoangler.com TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUTION – THE ORIGINAL SIX 4 ABOUT THE BOOK 4 CLAVEY RIVER 5 BACKGROUND 6 TROUT POPULATION DATA 6 STREAM POPULATIONS, REGULATIONS, AND ACCESS 7 DIRECTIONS TO REACH SEGMENT 3 AND 4 (E.G., BRIDGE CROSSING CLAVEY RIVER): 7 AREA MAP 8 CLAVEY RIVER FLOW STATISTICS 9 FISHING TECHNIQUES 9 EAGLE LAKE 10 BACKGROUND 11 BIG TROUT FOOD – TUI CHUBS 11 REGULATIONS AND ACCESS 11 DIRECTIONS TO EAGLE LAKE FROM RED BLUFF, CALIFORNIA: 11 AREA MAP 12 PRODUCTIVE TIMES AND ZONES TO FISH 13 FISHING TECHNIQUES 13 SPALDING TRACT – TOPO MAP 14 PIKES POINT – TOPO MAP 15 GOLDEN TROUT CREEK 16 OVERVIEW OF THE WATERSHED 17 ABUNDANCE OF CALIFORNIA GOLDEN TROUT 17 CALIFORNIA GOLDEN TROUT GENETIC DATA 17 STREAM POPULATIONS, REGULATIONS, AND ACCESS 18 DIRECTIONS TO COTTONWOOD PASS TRAILHEAD 18 AREA MAP 19 PHOTO JOURNAL – COTTONWOOD PASS TO TUNNEL MEADOW 20 FISHING TECHNIQUES 23 HEENAN LAKE 24 BACKGROUND 25 FLY ANGLER STATISTICS – 2007 SEASON (8/3/07 TO 10/28/07) 26 REGULATIONS AND ACCESS 27 AREA MAP 27 DIRECTIONS 27 PRODUCTIVE ZONES TO FISH 28 FISHING TECHNIQUES 28 UPPER KERN RIVER 29 BACKGROUND 30 KERN RIVER RAINBOWS 30 DISTRIBUTION OF KERN RIVER RAINBOWS 30 STREAM POPULATIONS, REGULATIONS AND ACCESS 31 MAP – LLOYD MEADOW ROAD TO FORKS OF THE KERN 32 SPOTLIGHT – FORKS OF THE KERN 33 DIRECTIONS AND TRAIL DESCRIPTION 33 RECOMMENDED FISHING GEAR 33 UPPER TRUCKEE RIVER 35 OVERVIEW OF THE WATERSHED 36 ABUNDANCE AND SIZE OF LAHONTAN CUTTHROAT 37 STREAM POPULATIONS, REGULATIONS, ACCESS & DISTANCE 37 DIRECTIONS TO REACH TRAILHEAD: 38 AREA MAP 39 TRAIL DESCRIPTION 40 FISHING TECHNIQUES 40 Introduction – The Original Six The Native Trout Waters of California details six of the state’s most scenic, diverse, and significant native trout fisheries.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Coexistence of Fish Species with Coastal Cutthroat Trout in Low Order Streams of Western Oregon and Washington, USA
    fishes Article Evaluating Coexistence of Fish Species with Coastal Cutthroat Trout in Low Order Streams of Western Oregon and Washington, USA Kyle D. Martens 1,* and Jason Dunham 2 1 Washington Department of Natural Resources, 1111 Washington Street SE, Olympia, WA 98504, USA 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center, 3200 SW Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: When multiple species of fish coexist there are a host of potential ways through which they may interact, yet there is often a strong focus on studies of single species without considering these interactions. For example, many studies of forestry–stream interactions in the Pacific Northwest have focused solely on the most prevalent species: Coastal cutthroat trout. To examine the potential for interactions of other fishes with coastal cutthroat trout, we conducted an analysis of 281 sites in low order streams located on Washington’s Olympic Peninsula and along the central Oregon coast. Coastal cutthroat trout and juvenile coho salmon were the most commonly found salmonid species within these streams and exhibited positive associations with each other for both presence and density. Steelhead were negatively associated with the presence of coastal cutthroat trout as well as with coho salmon and sculpins (Cottidae). Coastal cutthroat trout most frequently shared streams with juvenile coho salmon. For densities of these co-occurring species, associations between these two species were relatively weak compared to the strong influences of physical stream conditions Citation: Martens, K.D.; Dunham, J. (size and gradient), suggesting that physical conditions may have more of an influence on density Evaluating Coexistence of Fish Species with Coastal Cutthroat Trout than species interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo of Western North America
    CItiEt'SW XHPYTD: RSOTLAITYWUAS 4 Monograph of ha, TEMPI, AZ The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo Of Western North America Robert J. Behnke "9! August 1979 z 141, ' 4,W \ " • ,1■\t 1,es. • . • • This_report was funded by USDA, Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service , Bureau of Land Management FORE WARD This monograph was prepared by Dr. Robert J. Behnke under contract funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service. Region 2 of the Forest Service was assigned the lead in coordinating this effort for the Forest Service. Each agency assumed the responsibility for reproducing and distributing the monograph according to their needs. Appreciation is extended to the Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, for assistance in publication. Mr. Richard Moore, Region 2, served as Forest Service Coordinator. Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. Rocky Mountain Region September, 1980 Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. it TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................... Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Researches on the Effect of Essential Oils on Moulds Isolated
    Popa G. O. et al./Scientific Papers: Animal Science and Biotechnologies, 2018, 51 (2) SaMSTNb23 and SaMSTNb33: Emerging Markers for Growth Traits in Huchen (Hucho hucho, Linnaeus, 1758) 1, 1, 1 1 Gina–Oana Popa ‡, *, Ramona Nechifor ‡, Alexandru Burcea , Maria Samu , Andreea Dudu1, Marieta Costache1, Marilena Maereanu2, Sergiu Emil Georgescu1 1University of Bucharest, Faculty of Biology, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 91-95 Splaiul Independenței, 050095, Bucharest, Romania 2S.C. Danube Research-Consulting S.R.L., 89bis Câmpia Libertății Street, 825200, Isaccea, Romania ‡The first two authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract Huchen or Danube salmon (Hucho hucho, Linnaeus, 1758) is an economically and ecologically valuable salmonid species, among the most endangered fish species inhabiting the Danube basin. Consequently, appropriate conservation measures are required to prevent the species extinction. Although H. hucho is a poorly studied species, there are several studies on other salmonid species regarding fast growth markers. Following these studies, the main purpose of the current study was to determine growth-related SNPs in myostatin gene in H. hucho. Therefore, we analysed 20 aquaculture individuals of same age separated in two groups according length and weight, by sequencing the amplification product of SaMSTNb23 and SaMSTNb33 primers pairs. We also statistically analysed the differences in the development of individuals over time regarding total length, weight and head length. Significantly variations were observed (p < 0.001) for the measured traits in both groups. Regarding the genetic analysis, we observed nine SNPs in the mstn gene structure. Considering these results, it appears that the analysed markers are not appropriate for genetic analysis of growth traits in H.
    [Show full text]