DOCSLIB.ORG

Shepherd's Instruments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

SHEPHERD’S INSTRUMENTS JONATHAN L. FRIEDMANN Shepherds and shepherding appear frequently in the Hebrew Bible. As a pastoral-agricultural people, the Israelites not only depended on shepherds, but also developed metaphors associated with their role. God is likened to a shepherd who cares for his flock (e.g. Gen. 48:15; 49:24; Isa. 40:11; Ps. 23), while a failed king is a worthless shepherd who abandons his flock (Zech. 11:17; see also Ezek. 34). Shepherds are found among both commoners (e.g. Gen. 13:7–8; 26:20) and celebrated leaders, such as Abraham, Moses, and David. II Samuel ties David’s kingship to his shepherd beginnings: You shall shepherd My people Israel, and you shall be ruler of Israel (5:2); I took you from the pasture, from following the flock, to be ruler of My people Israel (7:8). Using Moses as an exemplar, Philo viewed shepherding as a prerequi- site for leadership: “Moses took his father-in-law’s herds and tended them, being thus instructed in the lessons proper to qualify him for becoming the leader of a people, for the business of a shepherd is a preparation for the of- fice of a king to anyone who is destined to preside over that most manageable of all flocks, mankind.”1 The prophesied ruler of a future united kingdom is likewise compared to a shepherd (Ezek. 34:23; 37:24). The presence of shepherds may partly account for the prevalence of musi- cal instruments in the Hebrew Bible. Instruments appear in over 250 biblical verses and are implied in hundreds more where singing takes place.2 Since ancient times, shepherds have made music to calm their flocks, scare off predators, communicate with other shepherds, and pass the time. Three standard shepherd’s instruments are attested in the Bible: lyre (kinnor), flute (ugav), and Bovidae horn (shofar). Like most instruments, these were not monofunctional or limited to a single setting. As a theologically focused text, the Bible most often mentions music-making in connection with cultic wor- ship and divine manifestations, but overlooks everyday uses, including by shepherds.3 Such omissions are consistent with the notion that biblical au- thors took musical matters for granted: the people were thoroughly acquaint- ed with their own soundscape, making certain details unnecessary.4 Cantor Jonathan L. Friedmann, Ph.D., is professor of Jewish music history and associate dean of the master of Jewish studies program at the Academy for Jewish Religion California. SHEPHERD’S INSTRUMENTS 119 Even so, the text preserves some faint, indirect references to shepherd’s instruments. This paper examines the evidence in four categories: general, kinnor, ugav, and shofar. GENERAL Genesis 4 presents Jubal as the ancestor of all who play the kinnor and ugav (v. 21). This verse appears in a compressed passage involving founders of human civilization. Jubal’s half-brother, Tubal-cain, is the first forger of metal tools and implements (v. 22), and his half-sister, Naamah, may have been the first singer, although her role (whatever it was) is absent from the text.5 Jubal’s brother, Jabal, is described as the ancestor of those who dwell in tents and amidst herds (v. 20). The pairing of string and wind instruments was conventional in the region.6 However, it seems appropriate that Jubal, presumably inventor of all musical instruments, is specifically linked to the kinnor and ugav, shepherd’s instruments, immediately after his brother is introduced as the archetypical herdsman/shepherd. The combination of musi- cal and shepherding skills would have been familiar to the story’s original audience. Additionally, shepherds were known to fashion their own instruments, per- haps not unlike Jubal.7 This practice may be reflected in depictions of King David as an instrument-maker. Introduced as a shepherd boy (I Sam. 16:11), David is later celebrated as the inventor of instruments for the Lord’s music (II Chron 7:6; see also Neh. 12:36). This image underscores the Davidic ori- gins of Temple music: according to the Chronicler, David instituted the Le- vitical musical apparatus that was later brought into Solomon’s Temple (I Chron. 15:16). Yet, David’s instruments also recall his modest beginnings as a musically inventive shepherd and, perhaps, reinforce shepherding as a met- aphor (or prerequisite) for effective leadership. Shepherds were equipped with various tools to steer and protect their flocks. These included a staff (Lev. 27:32; Zech. 11:7; Ps. 23:4), a sling to fend off robbers and predators (I Sam. 17:40, 50), and a sheepdog (Job 30:1). Some musical instruments helped calm the flocks (flutes and lyres), while others were sounded to alert fellow shepherds and frighten off human or ani- mal intruders (horns). Moreover, shepherds likely developed particular musi- cal styles to accompany shepherding and sheepshearing.8 Vol. 49, No. 2, 2021 120 JONATHAN L. FRIEDMANN Cross-cultural and cross-historical examples round out the picture of shep- herd’s instruments. For example, depictions from Sumer and Assyria have shepherds carrying both wind and string instruments to entertain themselves.9 The Greek god Hermes is portrayed as the inventor of the shepherd’s lyre, made from a tortoise shell and cow intestines.10 European instrumental music seems to be rooted in shepherd practices: flutes and bagpipes to break up monotony, natural horns for signaling, and bells for identifying animals.11 To this day, Abyssinian shepherds in Ethiopia soothe their animals with a lyre (masonquo) and flute (shambukaw).12 KINNOR The kinnor occurs forty-two times in the Hebrew Bible, mostly in the con- text of joyous rituals and celebrations relevant to the text’s theological fo- cus.13 However, as Jeremy Montagu, the late authority on biblical instruments and organology (scientific study of musical instruments and their classifica- tions), wrote: “Ordinary people, not only the Levites in the Temple orchestra, also played the lyre and many other instruments for their own enjoyment and for entertainment in the biblical period and later.”14 The musical skills that young David honed in humble pastures would later bring him to Saul’s attention and set him on the path to kingship. Shortly after Samuel finds David tending to his flock and anoints him as Israel’s fu- ture monarch, the spirit of the Lord [departs] from Saul, and an evil spirit [begins] to terrify him (I Sam. 16:14). Saul’s courtiers recommend that Saul enlist a talented lyrist to help lift his mood. One of them had observed David playing the kinnor, apparently with his sheep. Saul sends messengers to the boy’s father, Jesse, saying: “Send me your son David who is with his flock” (I Sam. 16:19). While David was no doubt an exceptional player, the ability of shepherds to play instruments, and even play them well, was not unique. According to Montagu, “David had been a shepherd, and like all animal herdsmen he played music, not just to pass the time while alone on the hills, but because playing music soothes herds of animals and keeps them calm and contented.”15 The shepherd’s lyre is strongly suggested in the text’s portrayal of David as both a shepherd and a musician. David’s ability to soothe his flock and calm the anguished king seem to be connected. Greek legends simi- larly depict Orpheus as a musical healer and a charmer of animals.16 JEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY SHEPHERD’S INSTRUMENTS 121 UGAV The ugav is mentioned four times in the Hebrew Bible: once with Jubal (Gen. 4:21); once in Psalms (150:4); and twice in the Book of Job (21:12; 30:31). Unlike the kinnor, the ugav was evidently limited to non-cultic uses; Psalm 150 includes it in a spiritual (but not ritual) context, but it is missing from lists of Temple instruments.17 There is ambiguity surrounding the in- strument’s shape and size, but several sources agree it was a shepherd’s flute.18 Many names of flute-like instruments contain the onomatopoeic sound “oo.” This is true of both the English “flute” and the Hebrew “ugav.” Others postulate that the flute’s association with “love, desire, ardor, and the like”19 indicates an etymological link to agav, implying “to be charming,”20 “was in love,”21 or “love-charm.”22 These worldly connotations may explain its absence from the Temple, as well as its ties to shepherds who charmed their flocks. Such flutes were generally long, wide, and vertical, and were common among shepherds of Mesopotamia, Egypt, and Semitic tribes.23 A suggestion of the shepherd’s ugav is found in Judges 5:16: you stay among the sheepfold and listen as they pipe for the flocks. The Hebrew here is ambiguous: it could refer to shepherds piping or whistling, or to the bleat- ing of sheep. Thus, depending on the interpretation, there is at least the possi- bility of shepherds piping on flutes. Saadia Gaon likewise relates Zechariah 10:8, I will whistle to them and gather them, to shepherd metaphors earlier in the chapter (vv. 2, 3), intimating a shepherd’s whistles or, as some scholars prefer, flute playing.24 SHOFAR The Hebrew Bible contains over seventy references to the shofar, most of which accompany significant episodes or events: announcing the divine pres- ence (e.g. Exod. 19:16; Zech. 9:14); adorning sacred ceremonies (e.g. Lev. 23:24; II Sam. 6:15); proclaiming kingship (I Kgs. 1:34; II Kgs. 9:13); and signaling on the battlefield (e.g. Judg. 3:27; II Sam. 2:28). Although its func- tion as a shepherd’s horn is not cited, a few verses show commoners, such as soldiers (Jdgs.
Recommended publications
  • 05Jun 1999.Pdf

    05Jun 1999.Pdf

    N V Doors DOiiic re than one sad tale has been told of too little suddenly that his door of opportunity was closed. and too late." Recall Jesus' story of the Ten Virgins Said his master. "Take from him the pound, and give it who were awaiting the Imminent return of the bride to him that hat/i ten pounds" Luke 19:24. groom. Five of them were wise and well prepared for The book of James tells the same truth in these his arrival, even if it should be unexpectedly delayed. stark words; "To him that knoweth to do good, and loeth And five were not wise, and not prepared. Jesus it not, to hun it is sin' James 4:1 7. called these latter ones "foolish.' We quite naturally think that something we do What made the difference? All had brightly burn wrong is more serious than something we simply do ing lamps until.,.the time delayed, and the lamps of not do. But James tells us this is not true. He says that five of them were burning low, Getting more oil not to do what we know we should is equally as wrong became urgent. And while these five went to find oil as openly committed sin. In other words, sins of for their lamps-the bridegroom came. `4nd they that omission are ust as culpable as sins of commission. were ready went in with him to the ,narriage: and the door Neglect is serious. It is the warning of the book of was shut." Hebrews: "How shall we escap if we neglect so great sat The open door dosed.
  • Who Were the Kenites? OTE 24/2 (2011): 414-430

    Who Were the Kenites? OTE 24/2 (2011): 414-430

    414 Mondriaan: Who were the Kenites? OTE 24/2 (2011): 414-430 Who were the Kenites? MARLENE E. MONDRIAAN (U NIVERSITY OF PRETORIA ) ABSTRACT This article examines the Kenite tribe, particularly considering their importance as suggested by the Kenite hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, the Kenites, and the Midianites, were the peoples who introduced Moses to the cult of Yahwism, before he was confronted by Yahweh from the burning bush. Scholars have identified the Cain narrative of Gen 4 as the possible aetiological legend of the Kenites, and Cain as the eponymous ancestor of these people. The purpose of this research is to ascertain whether there is any substantiation for this allegation connecting the Kenites to Cain, as well as con- templating the Kenites’ possible importance for the Yahwistic faith. Information in the Hebrew Bible concerning the Kenites is sparse. Traits associated with the Kenites, and their lifestyle, could be linked to descendants of Cain. The three sons of Lamech represent particular occupational groups, which are also connected to the Kenites. The nomadic Kenites seemingly roamed the regions south of Palestine. According to particular texts in the Hebrew Bible, Yahweh emanated from regions south of Palestine. It is, therefore, plausible that the Kenites were familiar with a form of Yahwism, a cult that could have been introduced by them to Moses, as suggested by the Kenite hypothesis. Their particular trade as metalworkers afforded them the opportunity to also introduce their faith in the northern regions of Palestine. This article analyses the etymology of the word “Kenite,” the ancestry of the Kenites, their lifestyle, and their religion.
  • Landscapes of Korean and Korean American Biblical Interpretation

    Landscapes of Korean and Korean American Biblical Interpretation

    BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION AMERICAN AND KOREAN LANDSCAPES OF KOREAN International Voices in Biblical Studies In this first of its kind collection of Korean and Korean American Landscapes of Korean biblical interpretation, essays by established and emerging scholars reflect a range of historical, textual, feminist, sociological, theological, and postcolonial readings. Contributors draw upon ancient contexts and Korean American and even recent events in South Korea to shed light on familiar passages such as King Manasseh read through the Sewol Ferry Tragedy, David and Bathsheba’s narrative as the backdrop to the prohibition against Biblical Interpretation adultery, rereading the virtuous women in Proverbs 31:10–31 through a Korean woman’s experience, visualizing the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) and demarcations in Galatians, and introducing the extrabiblical story of Eve and Norea, her daughter, through story (re)telling. This volume of essays introduces Korean and Korean American biblical interpretation to scholars and students interested in both traditional and contemporary contextual interpretations. Exile as Forced Migration JOHN AHN is AssociateThe Prophets Professor Speak of Hebrew on Forced Bible Migration at Howard University ThusSchool Says of Divinity.the LORD: He Essays is the on author the Former of and Latter Prophets in (2010) Honor ofand Robert coeditor R. Wilson of (2015) and (2009). Ahn Electronic open access edition (ISBN 978-0-88414-379-6) available at http://ivbs.sbl-site.org/home.aspx Edited by John Ahn LANDSCAPES OF KOREAN AND KOREAN AMERICAN BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION INTERNATIONAL VOICES IN BIBLICAL STUDIES Jione Havea Jin Young Choi Musa W. Dube David Joy Nasili Vaka’uta Gerald O. West Number 10 LANDSCAPES OF KOREAN AND KOREAN AMERICAN BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION Edited by John Ahn Atlanta Copyright © 2019 by SBL Press All rights reserved.
  • Another Look at Cain: from a Narrative Perspective

    Another Look at Cain: from a Narrative Perspective

    신학논단 제102집 (2020. 12. 31): 241-263 https://doi.org/10.17301/tf.2020.12.102.241 Another Look at Cain: From a Narrative Perspective Wm. J McKinstry IV, MATS Adjunct Faculty, Department of General Education Presbyterian University and Theological Seminary In the Hebrew primeval histories names often carry significant weight. Much etymological rigour has been exercised in determining many of the names within the Bible. Some of the meaning of these names appear to have a consensus among scholars; among others there is less consensus and more contention. Numerous proposals have come forward with varying degrees of convincing (or unconvincing as the case may be) philological arguments, analysis of wordplays, possi- ble textual emendations, undiscovered etymologies from cognates in other languages, or onomastic studies detailing newly discovered names of similarity found in other ancient Semitic languages. Through these robust studies, when applicable, we can ascertain the meanings of names that may help to unveil certain themes or actions of a character within a narrative. For most of the names within the primeval histories of Genesis, the 242 신학논단 제102집(2020) meaning of a name is only one feature. For some names there is an en- compassing feature set: wordplay, character trait and/or character role, and foreshadowing. Three of the four members in the first family in Genesis, Adam, Eve, and Abel, have names that readily feature all the elements listed above. Cain, however, has rather been an exception in this area, further adding to Genesis 4’s enigmaticness in the Hebrew Bible’s primeval history. While three characters (Adam, Eve, and Abel) have names that (1) sound like other Hebrew words, that are (2) sug- gestive of their character or actions and (3) foreshadow or suggest fu- ture events about those characters, the meaning of Cain’s name does not render itself so explicitly to his character or his role in the narrative, at least not to the same degree of immediate conspicuousness.
  • Noah's Wife and Heterosexual Incestuous

    Noah's Wife and Heterosexual Incestuous

    Judaica Ukrainica I (2012), 29–46 No Name WomaN: Noah’s Wife aNd heterosexual iNcestuous relatioNs iN GeNesis 9:18–29 corinne e. Blackmer Southern Connecticut State University [email protected] [Noah’s wife] was a nameless woman, and so at home among all those who were never found and never missed, who were uncommemorated, whose deaths were not remarked, nor their begettings1. I. The terse language and riddling innuendo of Gen 9:18–29, which narrates how Noah comes to curse Canaan, the son of Ham, has engaged the inter­ pretive energies of readers since the rabbis of the Babylonian Talmud spe­ culated that Ham had castrated his father2. The language of this narrative, bristling with obscure phrases, loud hints of dreadful sexual transgression, and pious cover ups, has often left subsequent interpreters sensing that the story has meanings that the narrator declines to delineate. Indeed, the only thing that remains clear is that Gen 9:18–29 functions as an etiological myth to justify the permanent subordination of the tribes of Canaan. Canaan commits an un­ speakable sexual crime against Noah’s family that results in the subsequent physical displacement and sweeping rejection of the customs of the Canaanite peoples. Indeed, Israel’s secure possession of the Promised Land is predicated on repudiating the cultural institutions of the preceding Canaanites. Whatever the larger and associated issues, however, interpretive positions have gener­ 30 Corinne E. BLACKMER ally revolved around two broad questions. What was the nature of Ham’s of­ fense, such that when he “saw his father’s nakedness” and told his brothers, Shem and Japheth, it merited the terrible curse of permanent servitude Noah pronounced over him3? Second, what was the rationale for the punishment of Canaan and why, if Ham committed the crime, would his son Canaan suffer the penalty instead? Exegetical traditions have identified the deed for which Noah curses Ca­ naan either as voyeurism, castration, or homosexual paternal incest.
  • BIBLICAL BEGINNINGS- “The Fall That Fractured Man” DATE: December 8, 2019 ​

    BIBLICAL BEGINNINGS- “The Fall That Fractured Man” DATE: December 8, 2019 ​

    MESSAGE/SERIES: BIBLICAL BEGINNINGS- “The Fall that Fractured Man” DATE: December 8, 2019 ​ SCRIPTURE FOR THIS WEEK: (These verses will help you understand themes within as you read our core text as scripture proves scripture) Genesis 3-5, Romans 5:12, 2 Corinthians 11:3, Hebrews 11:3-5, Revelations 12:9, 1 ​ John 3:12, John 8:44, 1 John 2:16, Matthew 4:3-8, 1 Timothy 2:14, Galatians 3:16, Romans 8:19-23 (Nature affected by curse), 1 John 3:8-12 (The Sinner practices ​ sin/love propels obedience & repentance), Isaiah 53:3 OPENING SCRIPTURE: [Genesis 3-5] “Now the serpent was more crafty than any other beast of the field that the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God actually say, ‘You shall not eat of any tree in the garden’?” 2 And the woman said to the serpent, “We may eat of the fruit of the trees in the garden, 3 but God said, ‘You shall not eat of the fruit of the tree that is in the midst of the garden, neither shall you touch it, lest you die.’ ” 4 But the serpent said to the woman, “You will not surely die. 5 For God knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” 6 So when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was a delight to the eyes, and that the tree was to be desired to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate, and she also gave some to her husband who was with her, and he ate.
  • Og King of Bashan, Enoch and the Books of Enoch: Extra-Canonical Texts and Interpretations of Genesis 6:1–4’* Ariel Hessayon

    Og King of Bashan, Enoch and the Books of Enoch: Extra-Canonical Texts and Interpretations of Genesis 6:1–4’* Ariel Hessayon

    Chapter 1 ‘Og King of Bashan, Enoch and the Books of Enoch: Extra-Canonical Texts and Interpretations of Genesis 6:1–4’* Ariel Hessayon It is not the Writer, but the authority of the Church, that maketh a Book Canonical [Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan (1651), part III, chap. 33 p. 204] For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of the giants (Deuteronomy 3:11) Renaissance Humanist, Franciscan friar, Benedictine monk, Doctor of Medicine and ‘Great Jester of France’, François Rabelais (c.1490–1553?) was the author of La vie, faits & dits Heroiques de Gargantua, & de son filz Pantagruel (Lyon, 1564). A satirical masterpiece with liberal dollops of scatological humour, it tells the irreverent story of Gargantua, his son Pantagruel and their companion Panurge. Gargantua and Pantagruel are giants and in an allusion to the Matthean genealogy of Christ the first book begins with a promised account of how ‘the Giants were born in this world, and how from them by a direct line issued Gargantua’. Similarly, the second book introduces a parody of the Old Testament genealogies: And the first was Chalbroth who begat Sarabroth who begat Faribroth who begat Hurtali, that was a brave eater of pottage, and reigned in the time of the flood. Acknowledging readers would doubt the veracity of this lineage, ‘seeing at the time of the flood all the world was destroyed, except Noah, and seven persons more with him in the Ark’, Rabelais described how the giant Hurtali survived the deluge. Citing the authority of a rabbinic school known as the Massoretes, ‘good honest fellows, true ballokeering blades, and exact Hebraical bagpipers’, Rabelais explained that Hurtali did not get in the ark (he was too big), but rather sat astride upon it, with ‘one leg on the one side, and another on the other, as little children use to do upon their wooden 6 Scripture and Scholarship in Early Modern England horses’.
  • A Whisper of Thunder a Bible Study Guide to Index the BOOK OF

    A Whisper of Thunder a Bible Study Guide to Index the BOOK OF

    A Whisper Of Thunder A Bible Study! Guide To Index! ! THE BOOK OF! JASHER! THIS IS THE BOOK OF THE GENERATIONS OF MAN! WHOM GOD CREATED UPON THE EARTH! ON THE DAY WHEN THE LORD GOD! MADE HEAVEN AND EARTH.! Referred to in Joshua! and Second Samuel.! ! Chapter 5! 11. !And it was in the eighty-fourth year of the life of Noah, that Enoch the son ! of Seth died, he was nine hundred and five years old at his death.! 2. !And in the one hundred and seventy ninth year of the life of Noah, Cainan the son of Enosh died, and all the days of Cainan were nine hundred and ! ten years, and he died. ! 3. !And in the two hundred and thirty fourth year of the life of Noah, Mahlallel the son of Cainan died, and the days of Mahlallel were eight hundred and ! ninety-five years, and he died. ! 4. !And Jared the son of Mahlallel died in those days, in the three hundred and thirty-sixth year of the life of Noah; and all the days of Jared were nine ! hundred and sixty-two years, and he died. ! 5. !And all who followed the Lord died in those days, before they saw the evil ! which God declared to do upon earth. ! 6. !And after the lapse of many years, in the four hundred and eightieth year of the life of Noah, when all those men, who followed the Lord had died away from amongst the sons of men, and only Methuselah was then left, ! God said unto Noah and Methuselah, saying, ! 7.
  • Second Baptist Church of Doylestown Bible Study Notes 6-19-19

    Second Baptist Church of Doylestown Bible Study Notes 6-19-19

    Second Baptist Church of Doylestown Bible Study Notes 6-19-19 Genesis 4 Cain and Abel – Verses 1-7 1Adam made love to his wife Eve, and she became pregnant and gave birth to Cain. She said, “With the help of the Lord I have brought forth a man.” 2 Later she gave birth to his brother Abel. Now Abel kept flocks, and Cain worked the soil. 3 In the course of time Cain brought some of the fruits of the soil as an offering to the Lord.4 And Abel also brought an offering—fat portions from some of the firstborn of his flock. The Lord looked with favor on Abel and his offering, 5 but on Cain and his offering he did not look with favor. So Cain was very angry, and his face was downcast. 6 Then the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? Why is your face downcast? 7 If you do what is right, will you not be accepted? But if you do not do what is right, sin is crouching at your door; it desires to have you, but you must rule over it.” 4:1 The phrase “made love to” is literally “he knew.” Sexual union means oneness and total knowledge of the other person. Sexual intercourse is the most intimate of acts, sealing a social, physical, and spiritual relationship. That is why God has reserved it for marriage alone. 4:2 No longer was everything provided for Adam and Eve as it was in the Garden of Eden, where their daily tasks were refreshing and delightful.
  • Genealogies and Spiritualities in Genesis 4:17-22, 4:25-26, 5:1-32

    Genealogies and Spiritualities in Genesis 4:17-22, 4:25-26, 5:1-32

    Acta Theologica Supplementum 8 2006 GENEALOGIES AND SPIRITUALITIES IN GENESIS 4:17-22, 4:25-26, 5:1-32 C. Lombaard1 ABSTRACT The three genealogies in Genesis 4:17-22, 4:25-26 en 5:1-32 show different intentions: the first wants (amongst other purposes) to give an aetiology of the trades; the second wants to stress the importance of a new beginning; the third wants to relate Adam to Noah. Each of these approaches to genealogy has a different intent; each wants to in- dicate a different aspect of God’s care. Each thus evidences an own (though not unre- lated) configuration of faith experienced, that is, a different spirituality. 1. OF FAITH IN OLD TESTAMENT TIMES, THE STUDY OF SPIRITUALITY, AND GENEALOGY SCHOLARSHIP Recent Old Testament scholarship has increasingly become aware of the variety of configurations of faith within ancient Israel. This diversity does not involve only a rather straightforward growth in the faith of Israel from one form of belief in God to, presumably, a more advanced form of belief in God. Such a heilsgeschichtliche approach — in the earlier sense of the term (cf. Mildenberger 2000:1585) — would be akin to the concept of progressive revelation, a view which regarded Old Testament history as a process of divine education of the Israelite nation (Rogerson 1988:537; cf. also Lombaard 2003:441). Rather, Old Testament scholarship has made us increasingly aware of different forms of faith within ancient Israel at different times, also with such different expressions competing with one another at the same time. Particularly useful in this regard have been formulations such as those by Rainer Albertz and Philip Davies, the former referring to “Religionsinterner Pluralismus” (Albertz 1978), the latter to “Judaisms” 1 Dr.
  • Genesis in Biblical Perspective the Gospel of Christ from Genesis Then They Received the Offering – Genesis 4 This Is the Word

    Genesis in Biblical Perspective the Gospel of Christ from Genesis Then They Received the Offering – Genesis 4 This Is the Word

    Genesis in Biblical Perspective The Gospel of Christ from Genesis Then They Received the Offering – Genesis 4 This is the word of God. Genesis 4. 1 Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, saying, “I have gotten a man with the help of the LORD .” 2 And again, she bore his brother Abel. Now Abel was a keeper of sheep, and Cain a worker of the ground. 3 In the course of time Cain brought to the LORD an offering of the fruit of the ground, 4 and Abel also brought of the firstborn of his flock and of their fat portions. And the LORD had regard for Abel and his offering, 5 but for Cain and his offering he had no regard. So Cain was very angry, and his face fell. 6 The LORD said to Cain, “Why are you angry, and why has your face fallen? 7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door. Its desire is for you, but you must rule over it.” 8 Cain spoke to Abel his brother. And when they were in the field, Cain rose up against his brother Abel and killed him. 9 Then the LORD said to Cain, “Where is Abel your brother?” He said, “I do not know; am I my brother's keeper?” 10 And the LORD said, “What have you done? The voice of your brother's blood is crying to me from the ground. 11 And now you are cursed from the ground, which has opened its mouth to receive your brother's blood from your hand.
  • Act Two: the Curse

    Act Two: the Curse

    THE STORY OF THE BIBLE: LESSON THREE Act Two: The Curse I. INTRODUCTION The Storyline The biblical story begins by introducing the setting, main characters, and initial plot. In the first act of the biblical narrative, the reader learns that… Through the act of creation, God establishes his kingdom over all things and appoints human beings to rule on his behalf as his image bearers, to fill the earth and develop his creation into a glorious civilization. Like most every other story, the biblical narrative quickly runs into the conflict that needs to be overcome. The introduction of this conflict makes up the second act of the biblical story. Tragically, human beings rebel against God as they seek to rule God’s creation their own way, resulting in the curse of evil and death upon the world, which infects every aspect of God’s good creation. The Place of Act Two in the Bible Genesis 3–11 raise a number of puzzling issues for readers: the identity of Cain’s wife, the longevity of life spans, the identity of the “sons of God,” and the nature of the flood, to name a few. The danger contemporary readers face is to allow these issues to sidetrack one from the main thrust of what God wants to communicate in these chapters about the curse and how it thwarts his kingdom-purposes for creation. II. ACT TWO: THE CURSE The Event of the Fall (Gen 3:1–7) Human Freedom. The development of God’s creation into a glorious civilization requires cooperation, for humankind to exercise freedom under God’s reign.