DOCSLIB.ORG

Greenback Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus Clarkii Stomias): a Technical Conservation Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greenback Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus Clarkii Stomias): a Technical Conservation Assessment Greenback Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project February 6, 2009 Michael K. Young, Ph.D USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station 800 East Beckwith Avenue Missoula, Montana 59801 Peer Review Administered by American Fisheries Society Young, M.K. (2009, February 6). Greenback Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/greenbackcutthroattrout.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Claire McGrath, Bruce Rosenlund, and Dave Winters for their comments on an earlier version of this document. The comments of Todd Allison, Warren Colyer, Greg Eaglin, Noah Greenwald, Paula Guenther-Gloss, Christine Hirsch, Jessica Metcalf, Dirk Miller, Kevin Rogers, and Dennis Shiozawa on a companion document on Colorado River cutthroat trout contributed to improving this paper. I appreciate the assistance of Dennis Shiozawa, Brigham Young University; Bill Wengert, Wyoming Game and Fish Department; and Shannon Albeke, Colorado Division of Wildlife, for sharing a number of unpublished reports. This work was funded by the Species Conservation Project for Region 2 and the Rocky Mountain Research Station, both part of the USDA Forest Service. AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY Michael Young has been a Research Fisheries Biologist with the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station since 1989. His work focuses on the ecology and conservation of native coldwater fishes and the effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbance on stream ecosystems. COVER ILLUSTRATION CREDIT Illustration of the Greenback Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias) by © Joseph Tomelleri. 2 3 SUMMARY OF KEY COMPONENTS FOR CONSERVATION OF THE GREENBACK CUTTHROAT TROUT Status Greenback cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii stomias) was once presumably distributed throughout the colder waters of the South Platte and Arkansas River basins in Colorado and southeastern Wyoming. Primarily a fluvial species, greenback cutthroat trout may have occupied 10,614 to 13,231 km of streams above 1,800 m in these basins. Nevertheless, the distribution of greenback cutthroat trout has dramatically contracted since the mid-1800’s, particularly from lower-elevation sites. Rebounding from a low of two populations occupying a few kilometers of small streams in 1970, populations regarded as greenback cutthroat trout now occupy up to 72 streams and lakes, 23 of which meet criteria for populations to count toward delisting under the Endangered Species Act. The bulk of these populations are found on federal lands, and many in the South Platte River basin are in Rocky Mountain National Park. Recent genetic evaluations, however, indicate that many populations considered historical remnants of greenback cutthroat trout may be Colorado River cutthroat trout. Individuals of both taxa were often mixed to develop recovery broodstocks, so the number of non-introgressed wild populations of greenback cutthroat trout is uncertain. With the enactment of the Endangered Species Act in 1973, the greenback cutthroat trout was listed as endangered but subsequently downlisted to threatened in 1978. Presently, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is conducting a review to determine whether this designation remains appropriate. Primary Threats Historically, habitat alteration from mining, agriculture, and water development contributed to the extirpation or reduction of large numbers of populations of greenback cutthroat trout, whereas introductions and invasions of nonnative trout probably represent the greatest cause of recent declines and the major impediment to restoration of this fish in much of its historical range. Many populations appear to remain vulnerable to this threat either because barriers to ongoing invasions are absent or because existing barriers may be temporary or have nonnative fish passed over them illegally. Ironically, the barriers themselves provide a limitation to dispersal, resulting in most populations of greenback cutthroat trout being restricted to short, headwater stream segments. Lack of connectivity to other populations renders them vulnerable in the short term to extirpation from natural disturbances such as fire, post-fire debris torrents, or floods and in the long term to loss of genetic variability and the potential for evolving in response to changing environmental conditions. This lack of connectivity also contributes to the greatest future threat to the persistence of this subspecies—climate change—because model projections suggest some suitable habitats may shift to higher elevations and precipitation patterns imply there may be large declines in late summer flows. Because these habitat changes are likely to be coupled with greater resource demands (particularly for water) by a rapidly growing human population in the Rocky Mountains, the future for stream populations of greenback cutthroat trout remains uncertain. The prospects for greenback cutthroat trout may be better in the many lakes used for conservation actions, with the understanding that such waters are unlikely to constitute historically occupied habitats. The potential effects of climate change on lake populations are uncertain, but isolation in such environments is likely to alter the genetic structure of some populations. Primary Conservation Elements, Management Implications, and Other Considerations Conservation of greenback cutthroat trout will require attention to both short-term and long-term threats. In the short term, preventing invasions by nonnative trout through the judicious use of barriers can protect some populations of greenback cutthroat trout, but perhaps the most successful long-term strategy will be to eliminate nonnative trout from downstream waters and expand the distribution of greenback cutthroat trout into larger basins exhibiting greater connectivity. Removal of nonnative trout and reintroduction of greenback cutthroat trout into formerly occupied habitats will also reduce the probability of losing all local populations simultaneously as well as offering the potential to conserve the remaining genetic variability represented in extant populations. Habitat improvement may have beneficial effects, particularly if combined with whole-basin changes in activities that degrade habitats, 2 3 although acknowledging the inherent temporal variability in habitat quality is essential. Given that habitat change is inevitable, managing to permit the continued evolution of this subspecies may be fundamental to its long-term persistence. Systematic conservation planning could prove to be an efficient and successful process for guiding future conservation efforts. 4 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..............................................................................................................................................2 AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................................................2 COVER ILLUSTRATION CREDIT ..............................................................................................................................2 SUMMARY OF KEY COMPONENTS FOR CONSERVATION OF THE GREENBACK CUTTHROAT TROUT ..3 Status..........................................................................................................................................................................3 Primary Threats..........................................................................................................................................................3 Primary Conservation Elements, Management Implications, and Other Considerations..........................................3 LIST OF TABLE AND FIGURES .................................................................................................................................7 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................................................8 Goal............................................................................................................................................................................8 Scope..........................................................................................................................................................................8 Treatment of Uncertainty ...........................................................................................................................................8 Application and Interpretation Limits........................................................................................................................9 Publication on the World Wide Web ..........................................................................................................................9 Peer Review ...............................................................................................................................................................9 MANAGEMENT STATUS AND NATURAL HISTORY .............................................................................................9 Management Status ....................................................................................................................................................9 Existing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Center Comments to the California Department of Fish and Game
    July 24, 2006 Ryan Broderick, Director California Department of Fish and Game 1416 Ninth Street, 12th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 RE: Improving efficiency of California’s fish hatchery system Dear Director Broderick: On behalf of the Pacific Rivers Council and Center for Biological Diversity, we are writing to express our concerns about the state’s fish hatchery and stocking system and to recommend needed changes that will ensure that the system does not negatively impact California’s native biological diversity. This letter is an update to our letter of August 31, 2005. With this letter, we are enclosing many of the scientific studies we relied on in developing this letter. Fish hatcheries and the stocking of fish into lakes and streams cause numerous measurable, significant environmental effects on California ecosystems. Based on these impacts, numerous policy changes are needed to ensure that the Department of Fish and Game’s (“DFG”) operation of the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not adversely affect California’s environment. Further, as currently operated, the state’s hatchery and stocking program do not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act, Administrative Procedures Act, California Endangered Species Act, and federal Endangered Species Act. The impacts to California’s environment, and needed policy changes to bring the state’s hatchery and stocking program into compliance with applicable state and federal laws, are described below. I. FISH STOCKING NEGATIVELY IMPACTS CALIFORNIA’S NATIVE SALMONIDS, INCLUDING THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES Introduced salmonids negatively impact native salmonids in a variety of ways. Moyle, et. al. (1996) notes that “Introduction of non-native fish species has also been the single biggest factor associated with fish declines in the Sierra Nevada.” Moyle also notes that introduced species are contributing to the decline of 18 species of native Sierra Nevada fish species, and are a major factor in the decline of eight of those species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo of Western North America
    CItiEt'SW XHPYTD: RSOTLAITYWUAS 4 Monograph of ha, TEMPI, AZ The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo Of Western North America Robert J. Behnke "9! August 1979 z 141, ' 4,W \ " • ,1■\t 1,es. • . • • This_report was funded by USDA, Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service , Bureau of Land Management FORE WARD This monograph was prepared by Dr. Robert J. Behnke under contract funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service. Region 2 of the Forest Service was assigned the lead in coordinating this effort for the Forest Service. Each agency assumed the responsibility for reproducing and distributing the monograph according to their needs. Appreciation is extended to the Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, for assistance in publication. Mr. Richard Moore, Region 2, served as Forest Service Coordinator. Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. Rocky Mountain Region September, 1980 Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. it TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................... Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Management of Threatened and Endangered Western Trouts
    Biology and Management of Threatened and Endangered Western Trouts August 1976 USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-28 Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 Abstract Behnke, R. J., and Mark Zarn. 1976. Biology and management of threatened and endangered western trouts. USDA For. Sew. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-28, 45 p. Rocky Mt. For. and Range Exp. Stn., Fort Collins, Colo. Discusses taxonomy, reasons for decline, life history and ecology, and sug- gestions for preservation and management of six closely related trouts native to western North America: Colorado River cutthroat, Salmo clarki pleuriticus; green- back trout, S. c. stomias; Lahontan cutthroat, S. c. henshawi; Paiute trout, S. c. seleniris; Gila trout, S. gilae; and Arizona native trout, S. apache. Meristic characters, distribution and status, habitat requirements and limiting factors, protective measures, and management recommendations are presented for each taxon. Keywords: Native trout, Salrno clarki pleuriticus. Sali?zo ckurki stoi~zius. Sulnzo clarki herzshawi, Salmo clarki seleniris, Salrno gilue. Sulrno uprrchc. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-28 August 1976 Biology and Management of Threatened and Endangered Western Trouts R. J. Behnke Colorado State University Mark Zarn Conservation Library Denver Public Library Information reported here was prepared under contract by the Conservation Library of the Denver Public Library, through the Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. The report is printed as prepared by the authors; opinions are not necessarily those of the U.S. Forest Service. TABLE OF CONTENTS I . GJ3NERAL MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES FOR RAE3 AND ENDANGJIRED WESTERN TROUTS Introduction ..........................
    [Show full text]
  • History of Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in Spring Creek, Utah
    Spring Creek Population History of the Pyramid Lake Rediscovery (Again) Unfortunately, given its small size, the trout Lahontan Cutthroat population at Spring Creek has a very low In October 2009, a team from Weber State probability of survival. It lacks the numbers The Lahontan cutthroat trout, Oncorhynchus University in conjunction with personnel and space necessary to maintain sufficient clarkii henshawi, is native to the Lahontan Basin from the DWR identified several specimens genetic diversity. It is believed that for a on the border between California and Nevada. believed to be of a pure or hybrid strain of mountain stream cutthroat population to For thousands of years it thrived and played the Pyramid Lake Lahontan cutthroat trout survive it must have a minimum of 3.3 km an important economic and cultural role in Spring Creek in Uintah, Utah. Using of habitat and an abundance in the area of among the Native American tribes of the electrofishers and dip nets, a 600 m stretch 0.3 fish per meter.3 Based on our region. The largest strain of this fish of the stream was sampled. A maximum observations, the Spring Creek population originated in Pyramid Lake, in western of 16 different individuals was collected in A Unique Environment has a maximum abundance of 0.1 fish/m Nevada and has reached recorded weights of two sampling trips. The fish appeared to Spring Creek’s unique vegetation and only 200 m of habitat. However, against up to 41 pounds, making it the largest “The Fish that Won’t Die” be restricted to a 200 m stretch.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado River Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus Clarkii Pleuriticus): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Colorado River Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project October 10, 2008 Michael K. Young, Ph.D USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station 800 East Beckwith Avenue Missoula, Montana 59801 Peer Review Administered by American Fisheries Society 1 Young, M.K. (2008, October 10). Colorado River Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/coloradorivercutthroattrout.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank Todd Allison, Warren Colyer, Greg Eaglin, Noah Greenwald, Paula Guenther-Gloss, Christine Hirsch, Jessica Metcalf, Dirk Miller, Kevin Rogers, and Dennis Shiozawa for their comments on an earlier version of this manuscript. My thanks also to Claire McGrath, Bruce Rosenlund, and Dave Winters for their reviews of a similar manuscript on a related subspecies. I appreciate the assistance of Dennis Shiozawa, Brigham Young University; Bill Wengert, Wyoming Game and Fish Department; and Dan Brauch, Colorado Division of Wildlife, for sharing a number of unpublished reports. This work was funded by the Species Conservation Project for Region 2 and the Rocky Mountain Research Station, both part of the USDA Forest Service. AUTHOR’S BIOGRAPHY Michael Young has been a Research Fisheries Biologist with the USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station since 1989. His work focuses on the ecology and conservation of native coldwater fishes and the effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbances on stream ecosystems. COVER ILLUSTRATION CREDIT Illustration of the Colorado River Cutthroat Trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii pleuriticus) by © Joseph Tomelleri.
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Series No
    P 2RCI-1IVES FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA Translation Series No: 405 Studies on the parasites of salmonoid fishes in Japan. I by Tamao Fukiu Collection of theses, Yokohama University, Vol. 10 . (gatural Science Series), No. 1, pp. 581-634. November 20, 1958 (Collection of theses in commemoration of the tenth anniversary of the opening of the University.) Preliminary Translation Translated by the Bureau for Translations Foreign Languages Division Department of the Secretary of State of Canada Fisheries Research Board of Canada Biological Station, Nanaimo, B.C. 1962 W i Studies on the parasites of salmonoid fishes in Japan (1) by Tamao Fukui Collection of theses, Yokahama University Our No. 79101 Nov. 20, 1958 Your No. Fisheries Vol. 10 (Natural Science Series), No. 1, pp. 581-634 (Collection of theses in commemoration of the tenth anniversary of the open- ing of the University) Contents I. Introduction II. Species of Salmonidae in the North Pacific and Japan III. Studies in Japan of parasites of species of Salmonidae IV. An outline of recent studies in the United States, Canada, and the Soviet Union. V. Known parasites.of Salmonidae VI. Sources of the investigation I. Introduction The author made investigations of parasites in Salmonidae since 1955 at the request of the Fisheries Agency and wishes here to make a tenta- tive summary. In 1955 and 1956 the investigations were based on the speci- mens, collected by officials of the Fisheries Agency on its research vessels. In 1957 and 1958, the investigations were based on the frozen specimens., •which were sent to the Fisheries Agency from the United States, and on the specimens, which the author collected in Hokkaido and Aomori-Ken.
    [Show full text]
  • Triploidy Induced by Pressure Shock in Arctic Charr (Salvelinus Alpinus) : Growth, Survival and Maturation Until the Third Year C
    Triploidy induced by pressure shock in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) : growth, survival and maturation until the third year C. Gillet, C. Vauchez, Pierrick Haffray To cite this version: C. Gillet, C. Vauchez, Pierrick Haffray. Triploidy induced by pressure shock in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) : growth, survival and maturation until the third year. Aquatic Living Resources, EDP Sciences, 2001, 14, pp.327-334. hal-02669979 HAL Id: hal-02669979 https://hal.inrae.fr/hal-02669979 Submitted on 31 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Aquat. Living Resour. 14 (2001) 327−334 © 2001 Ifremer/CNRS/Inra/IRD/Cemagref/Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS. All rights reserved S0990744001011299/FLA Triploidy induced by pressure shock in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus): growth, survival and maturation until the third year Christian Gilleta*, Cécile Vauchezb, Pierrick Haffrayb a Institut national de la recherche agronomique, BP 511, 74203 Thonon cedex, France b Syndicat des sélectionneurs avicoles et aquacoles français, Section aquacole, Station Scribe, campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes, France Received 22 February 2001; accepted 29 August 2001 Abstract − Retention of the second polar body for the production of triploid Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) was induced by 65 MPa (650 bar) pressure shocks applied 30, 40 or 50 min after fertilization, each shock lasting 5 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Pug-Headedness Anomaly in a Wild and Isolated Population of Native Mediterranean Trout Salmo Trutta L., 1758 Complex (Osteichthyes: Salmonidae)
    diversity Communication Pug-Headedness Anomaly in a Wild and Isolated Population of Native Mediterranean Trout Salmo trutta L., 1758 Complex (Osteichthyes: Salmonidae) Francesco Palmas 1,* , Tommaso Righi 2, Alessio Musu 1, Cheoma Frongia 1, Cinzia Podda 1, Melissa Serra 1, Andrea Splendiani 2, Vincenzo Caputo Barucchi 2 and Andrea Sabatini 1 1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente, Università di Cagliari, Via T. Fiorelli 1, 09126 Cagliari (CA), Italy; [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (C.F.); [email protected] (C.P.); [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (A.S.) 2 Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell’Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche, via Brecce Bianche, 60100 Ancona, Italy; [email protected] (T.R.); [email protected] (A.S.); [email protected] (V.C.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.:+39-070-678-8010 Received: 28 August 2020; Accepted: 12 September 2020; Published: 15 September 2020 Abstract: Skeletal anomalies are commonplace among farmed fish. The pug-headedness anomaly is an osteological condition that results in the deformation of the maxilla, pre-maxilla, and infraorbital bones. Here, we report the first record of pug-headedness in an isolated population of the critically endangered native Mediterranean trout Salmo trutta L., 1758 complex from Sardinia, Italy. Fin clips were collected for the molecular analyses (D-loop, LDH-C1* locus. and 11 microsatellites). A jaw index (JI) was used to classify jaw deformities. Ratios between the values of morphometric measurements of the head and body length were calculated and plotted against values of body length to identify the ratios that best discriminated between malformed and normal trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout
    Oregon Native Fish Status Report – Volume II Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout Existing Populations Lahontan cutthroat trout populations in the Coyote Lakes basin are remnant of a larger population inhabiting pluvial Lake Lahontan during the Pleistocene era. Hydrologic access routes of founding cutthroat trout from Lake Lahontan basin into the Coyote Lakes basin have yet to be described (Coffin and Cowan 1995). The Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout SMU is comprised of five populations (Table 1). All populations express a resident life history strategy; however large individuals in the Willow and Whitehorse Complex populations suggest a migratory component may exist. Table 1. Populations, existence status, and life history of the Coyote Lake Lahontan Cutthroat Trout SMU. Exist Population Description Life History Yes Willow Willow Creek and tributaries. Resident / Migratory Yes Whitehorse Complex Whitehorse and Little Whitehorse Creeks, and Resident / Migratory tributaries. Yes Doolittle Doolittle Creek above barrier. Resident Yes Cottonwood Cottonwood Creek above barrier. Resident Yes Antelope Antelope Creek. Resident Lahontan cutthroat trout from Willow and Whitehorse creeks were transplanted into Cottonwood Creek in 1971 and 1980, and into Antelope Creek in 1972 (Hanson et al. 1993). Whether Lahontan cutthroat trout were present in these creeks prior to stocking activities is disputed (Behnke 1992, Hanson et al. 1993, Coffin and Cowan 1995, K. Jones, ODFW Research Biologist, Corvallis, OR personal communication). For the purpose of this review these populations are considered native. Lahontan cutthroat trout were also transplanted into Fifteenmile Creek above a natural barrier (Hanson et al. 1993), but they did not establish a self- sustaining population (ODFW Aquatic Inventory Project, unpublished data).
    [Show full text]
  • Injection Vaccination of White-Spotted Char, Salvelinus Leucomaenis, Against Furunculosis with Aeromonas Salmonicida Salmolysin
    魚 病 研 究Gyobyo Kenkyu,26(1),17-20,1991.3 Injection Vaccination of White-Spotted Char, Salvelinus leucomaenis, against Furunculosis with Aeromonas salmonicida Salmolysin EijiroKawahara, Tomohiro Ueda and SetsuzoNomura LaboratoryofAquatic Microbiology,School of Fisheries Sciences, KitasatoUniversity,Sanriku, Kesen,Iwate 022-01, Japan (ReceivedAugust 22, 1990) Aeromonas salmonicida salmoysin was detoxified by heating at 37•Ž for 24 h, at 60•Ž for 30 min, at 100•Ž for 5 min, or heating at 37 or 60•Ž for 30 min with 0.4 % (v/v) formalin. These detoxified salmolysins and native salmolysin reacted with rabbit anti-native salmolysin serum. Juvenile white-spotted char (Salvelinus leucomaenis) were immunized two times at two-week intervals by intramuscular injection of salmolysin which was detoxified by heating at 60•ŽC for 30 min. Mor talities of immunized and control fishes after challenge were 28.6 and 62.5 %, respectively . An antibody to salmolysin was detected in immunized fish sera, but not detected in control fish sera. These results indicate that detoxified salmolysin is an effective immunogen for the prevention of furunculosis in white-spotted char. detoxified salmolysin for white-spotted char. Introduction Furunculosis, caused by Aeromonas salmonicida, Materials and Methods occurs particularly in farmed white-spotted char (Salvelinus leucomaenis) and coho salmon (Oncor Fish hynchus kisutch) in Japan. Damage by this Juvenile white-spotted char (Salvelinus leucoma disease in these fish is severe and economically enis) weighing about 2.8 g were used in this vaccine important. experiment. Fish erythrocytes for determination To develop an effective vaccine for the disease, of hemolytic activity were collected from yearing the protective immune response of fish against white-spotted char weighing about 100 g.
    [Show full text]
  • Salvelinus Confluentus) and Dolly Varden (S. Malma
    Molecular evidence of current and historical introgressive hybridization between bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and Dolly Varden (S. malma) by ZOE REDENBACH B.Sc, University of British Columbia, 1997 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Zoology) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA August 2000 © Zoe Redenbach, 2000 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada DE-6 (2/88) ABSTRACT Natural hybridization, once thought to be relatively rare, has been widely observed in both plants and animals. Studies of species that hybridize at low rates across wide ranges, however, are still relatively rare. Dolly Varden (Salvelinus malma) and bull trout (S. confluentus) have widely overlapping ranges and have been shown to hybridize at two localities. This thesis is a molecular analysis of Dolly Varden / bull trout hybridization over a range of spatial scales. Large-scale mtDNA phylogeography revealed that Dolly Varden survived the last glaciation in a previously unsuspected refuge south of the ice sheet, which resulted in continuous sympatry of a Dolly Varden refugial population with bull trout over the last 100,000 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Water Temperature and Beaver Ponds on Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in a High-Desert Stream, Southeastern Oregon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Andrew G. Talabere for the degree of Master of Science in Fisheries Science presented on November 21. 2002. Title: Influence of Water Temperature and Beaver Ponds on Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in a High-Desert Stream, Southeastern Oregon Abstract approved Redacted for Privacy Redacted for Privacy The distribution of Lahontan cutthroat trout Oncorhynchus clarki henshawi was assessed in a high-desert stream in southeastern Oregon where beaver Castor canadensis are abundant. Longitudinal patterns of beaver ponds, habitat, temperature, and Lahontan cutthroat trout age group distribution were identified throughout Willow Creek. Three distinct stream segments were classified based on geomorphological characteristics. Four beaver-pond and four free-flowing sample sections were randomly located in each of the three stream segments. Beavers substantially altered the physical habitat of Willow Creek increasing the depth and width of available habitat. In contrast, there was no measurable effect on water temperature. The total number of Lahontan cutthroat trout per meter was significantly higher in beaver ponds than free-flowing sections. Although density (fish! m2) showed no statistically significant (P < 0.05) increase, values in beaver pondswere two-fold those of free-flowing sections. Age- 1 and young-of-the-year trout were absent or in very low numbers in lower Willow Creek because of elevated temperatures, but high numbers of age-2 and 3 (adults) Lahontan cutthroat trout were found in beaver ponds where water temperatures reached lethal levels (>24°C). Apparently survival is greater in beaver ponds than free-flowing sections as temperatures approach lethal limits. Influence of Water Temperature and Beaver Ponds on Lahontan Cutthroat Trout in a High- Desert Stream, Southeastern Oregon by Andrew G.
    [Show full text]