DOCSLIB.ORG

LLP Conference 2019 Lincolnshire Performance Data Review OFSTED Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
LLP Conference 2019 Lincolnshire Performance Data Review OFSTED Overview Welcome to Autumn Leadership Briefings • Chair of the LLPB – Suzanne Scott LLP Conference 2019 Lincolnshire Performance Data Review OFSTED Overview Outstanding Good Requires Inadequate Improvement Phase Lincs National Lincs National Lincs National Lincs National Nursery 60.0% 62.6% 40.0% 35.4% - 1.8% - 0.3% Primary 14.7% 19.1% 71.9% 70.5% 9.4% 9.2% 4.0% 1.2% PRU / AP - - 50.0% - - - 50.0% - Secondary 24.5% 23.7% 43.4% 56.3% 13.2% 15.1% 18.9% 4.9% Special 45.0% 39.1% 50.0% 54.3% 5.0% 4.4% - 2.2% Total 18.4% 21.6% 65.9% 66.9% 9.5% 9.7% 6.1% 1.8% Overall Effectiveness: RI and Inadequate EYFS Data Name % Achieving GLD Overall Average Score National 71.5% 34.6 East Midlands 69.6% 34.2 Statistical Neighbours Average NYA NYA Lincolnshire 69.0% 34.3 Boston Borough Council 62.2% 32.5 East Lindsey District Council 65.8% 33.8 Lincoln City Council 66.1% 32.8 North Kesteven District Council 76.2% 35.9 South Holland District Council 65.5% 34.0 South Kesteven District Council 73.3% 35.5 West Lindsey District Council 69.5% 34.4 EYFS Data Strength Areas for Development Early Years • Percentage of pupils meeting the • Increase the number of pupils achieving GLD by expected standard in Early Learning improving standards in Literacy to reduce the Goals: Technology, Exploring and Using increasing GAP between Lincolnshire and Media and Materials, and Being National. Imaginative continue to stay above • Reduce the GAP between Disadvantaged pupils National. achieving 'All Early Learning Goals'. Phonics Phonics – Year 2 Key Stage 1 Reading, Writing and Maths Reading (R) Writing (W) Maths (M) Name Number of Pupils % >=EXS % GDS % >=EXS % GDS % >=EXS % GDS % >=EXS % GDS National 649,367 65.5% 11.7% 75.5% 25.6% 69.9% 15.9% 76.1% 21.8% East Midlands 52,659 63.4% 10.8% 73.6% 24.1% 68.4% 14.9% 74.9% 20.5% Lincolnshire (Locally Calculated) 8,316 62.3% 10.2% 72.2% 23.4% 66.9% 14.7% 73.5% 19.3% Boston Borough Council 855 58.8% 7.0% 66.0% 15.6% 62.9% 10.6% 70.2% 15.4% East Lindsey District Council 1,385 59.9% 8.4% 70.3% 21.4% 64.9% 12.6% 71.4% 18.2% Lincoln City Council 1,017 55.9% 8.6% 65.4% 20.5% 59.2% 11.7% 68.0% 17.2% North Kesteven District Council 1,371 65.2% 12.3% 76.7% 27.3% 71.3% 18.2% 76.5% 21.4% South Holland District Council 995 61.0% 9.9% 71.5% 20.7% 66.3% 14.3% 72.4% 18.6% South Kesteven District Council 1,629 65.4% 11.8% 75.3% 26.1% 69.8% 16.4% 76.9% 20.7% West Lindsey District Council 1,064 66.5% 11.8% 76.6% 28.5% 70.8% 16.4% 76.3% 21.3% Key Stage 1 Strengths Areas for Development Key Stage 1 • Percentage of pupils achieving Expected • To improve percentage of pupils achieving expected Standard attainment in Writing and Maths has standard in Reading, Writing, Mathematics combined. continued to increase in 2018. • To improve attainment/progress of spring summer males • Percentage of pupils achieving Greater Depth born did not achieve a GLD or meet the threshold of the attainment has continued to increase in 2018 phonics screening in all subjects. • Reduce the Writing GAP between LA Disadvantaged and • The Greater Depth attainment measure GAP National Disadvantaged. between LA and National is reducing for Writing and Maths. Key Stage 2 Progress 2017 & 2018 Trend: % RWM Expected Reading Writing Maths Region Name Standard or Above Progress Progress Progress 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 National 61.6% 64.3% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 East Midlands 59.0% 62.2% -0.7 -0.5 -0.2 -0.2 -0.6 -0.4 Lincolnshire 56.9% 59.5% -0.9 -0.7 -0.6 -0.3 -1.2 -0.9 Boston Borough Council 56.5% 56.9% -0.2 -0.5 1.1 1.2 0.1 0.3 East Lindsey District Council 54.9% 57.1% -0.5 -0.7 -0.7 -1.0 -1.0 -0.9 City of Lincoln Council 48.4% 53.3% -2.0 -0.7 -0.8 -0.3 -1.9 -0.6 North Kesteven District Council 64.9% 67.0% -0.5 -0.4 -0.5 0.1 -0.5 -0.6 South Holland District Council 53.2% 53.3% -1.1 -1.2 -1.7 -0.4 -1.9 -1.4 South Kesteven District Council 60.2% 63.3% -1.2 -0.6 -0.4 -0.1 -1.5 -0.9 West Lindsey District Council 55.8% 60.9% -1.0 -0.8 -1.1 -1.0 -1.6 -1.5 Key Stage 2 Reading Writing Maths GPS Name Cohort EXS+ GDS EXS+ GDS EXS+ GDS EXS+ GDS Lincolnshire 7,758 71.4% 24.7% 75.5% 18.2% 71.0% 18.1% 73.6% 29.0% Boston Borough Council 754 66.3% 17.1% 76.1% 13.9% 70.8% 14.5% 72.0% 27.9% East Lindsey District Council 1,295 72.0% 22.2% 71.4% 15.6% 69.0% 16.4% 72.3% 29.3% City of Lincoln Council 928 65.7% 21.6% 70.2% 14.4% 65.4% 16.7% 69.5% 28.0% North Kesteven District Council 1,178 78.4% 30.2% 82.7% 22.7% 77.2% 21.4% 81.7% 32.9% South Holland District Council 956 64.0% 20.4% 70.4% 16.5% 66.4% 14.0% 65.9% 23.5% South Kesteven District Council 1,601 74.0% 28.6% 78.7% 22.2% 72.8% 22.6% 75.3% 29.4% West Lindsey District Council 1,040 74.9% 27.8% 76.6% 18.3% 73.1% 17.2% 75.8% 30.3% Key Stage 2 Strengths Areas for Development Key Stage 2 • Reading, Writing and • To be in line with National in Reading, Mathematics Combined at KS2 Writing and Mathematics (64.3%). • has increased to 59.4% from Progress of Lincolnshire pupils with Average* KS1 Prior Attainment. 57.8% in 2017 • To improve the maths progress of most able Key Stage 4 Pupils completing KS4 Average Attainment 8 Score Grade 5+ English & Maths DfE School Name District Number Diff 2018 2017 2018 2017 Diff (+/-) 2018 2017 (+/-) - National (NCER) **** - - - 46.2 - - 42.9% - - 925 Lincolnshire - Relative ** - 6,935 7,255 47.7 47.7 0.0 44.2% 43.8% 0.4% 925 Lincolnshire - Actual * - 6,935 7,549 47.7 46.4 1.3 44.2% 42.4% 1.8% - Boston - Relative ** Boston 589 635 44.3 39.2 5.1 31.2% 30.2% 1.0% - City of Lincoln - Relative ** City of Lincoln 891 946 42.6 46.9 -4.3 36.6% 39.7% -3.2% - East Lindsey - Relative ** East Lindsey 1,152 1,256 46.8 45.7 1.1 41.1% 40.2% 0.9% - North Kesteven - Relative ** North Kesteven 1,207 1,247 49.3 47.6 1.7 41.2% 41.3% -0.1% - South Holland - Relative ** South Holland 882 926 46.7 47.6 -0.9 41.6% 41.7% -0.1% - South Kesteven - Relative ** South Kesteven 1,479 1,480 50.4 49.9 0.5 52.3% 51.3% 1.0% - West Lindsey - Relative ** West Lindsey 735 765 52.4 54.7 -2.3 60.3% 58.2% 2.1% Key Stage 4 Strengths Areas for Development Key Stage 4 Attainment 8 and Grade 5+ English and Maths above National % pupils achieving 5+ in English & Maths • 55.8% of schools submitted (29 out of 52) show a positive improvement to 2017. % pupils achieving 5+ in English • 42.3% of schools submitted (22 out of 52) have improved their pass rates in this subject compared to 2017. % pupils achieving 5+ in Maths • 55.8% of schools submitted (29 out of 52) have improved their pass rates compared to 2017 in this subject. Peer Review Outcomes Top Five Areas of Strength in Lincolnshire Schools Overall Top areas of strength in Lincolnshire schools based on 2017-18 peer reviews 80% 71% 70% 60% 50% 45% 45% 42% 42% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Personal Safeguarding Teaching & Curriculum Leadership Development, Learning Behaviour & Welfare The Focus of Peer Review Discussions Examples of top 5 areas of focus for peer reviews as reported by Lincolnshire schools in 2017-18 • Pupil Progress – DISAD writers, progress is hindered by mobility – school recognises number of children reaching GD needs to increase, progress measures are below the National • Middle Leadership – New models or systems introduced so needs work or new members of staff or within recruitment • Teaching & Learning – marking and feedback is currently under feedback, ensure the successful group work Is recorded somehow, new staff so need to be kept consistent practice across the school with new team including NQT • Attainment – Ensure outcomes in Phonics are at least in line with the national, overall outcomes in KS2, KS2 reading results • Assessment – Tracking of formative assessment still in a developing stage – new system, to make fuller use of the school’s assessment and tracking system ensuring that all users use this to identify the progress of significant groups, further development of peer and self assessment Top Five Development Areas in Lincolnshire Schools Overall Top areas for development in Lincolnshire schools based on 2018-19 peer reviews 40% 34% 35% 32% 32% 30% 29% 25% 24% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% Pupil Progress Middle Leadership Teaching & Attainment Assessment Learning Focus of the peer review: Key words cited in response to the question during 2017-18 peer reviews: ‘What was the focus for the peer review?’ Focus of the school improvement workshop? Schools’ Top Concerns in 2017- 18 by Locality Key: - Boston - East Lindsey - Lincoln - North Kesteven - South Holland - South Kesteven - West Lindsey Schools’ Top Concerns in 2017-18 by Phase Key: -Infant - Nursery - Primary - Secondary - Special Directory of School Support School How might the peer reviewed school support others in its area of strength or expertise? Alford Primary School Curriculum and Governance Barkston & Syston CE Primary School Safeguarding Bassingham Primary School Attendance & Punctuality, Monitoring & Evaluation and Pupil Progress Boston Tower Road Academy Monitoring & Evaluation, Personal Development, Behaviour & Welfare, Safeguarding and SEND Boston West Academy Curriculum, Personal Development, Behaviour & Welfare and Teaching & Learning Gainsborough Nursery School Assessment, Attainment, Curriculum, Leadership,Monitoring & Evaluation, Personal Development, Behaviour & Welfare, Pupil Progress and Teaching & Learning Grantham Ambergate Sports College Assessment, Middle Leadership and SEND Grantham St Mary’s Catholic Primary School Assessment, Curriculum, Leadership, Personal Development, Behaviour & Welfare, Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Diversity (British Values) and Sports Premium Grasby All Saints CE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Notice of Minimum Number of the Electorate Required to Petition for a Referendum for an Elected Mayor
    NOTICE OF MINIMUM NUMBER OF THE ELECTORATE REQUIRED TO PETITION FOR A REFERENDUM FOR AN ELECTED MAYOR Under the Local Government Act 2000 and under the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Act 2007, one of the things we have to do by law is let people know about their right to ask for a referendum if they want an elected mayor to manage their council. We also have to tell you the numbers needed for a valid petition. If 5% of the number of people on the local electoral register submit a petition asking for a referendum for an elected mayor, then the local council must hold a referendum in their area. We have listed the numbers of people the 5% equates to in each council district in Lincolnshire, as well as the total for Lincolnshire County Council – these figures apply from 15 February 2021. District 5% of electoral register needed Boston Borough 2,412 East Lindsey 5,511 City of Lincoln 3,132 North Kesteven 4,592 South Holland 3,547 South Kesteven 5,444 West Lindsey 3,704 Lincolnshire 28,342 These figures will be used to check the validity of any petition received between 1 April 2021 and 31 March 2022 or any earlier date required by Government Regulation. Every year we publish the 5% figures and remind you of your right to tell us in a petition that you would like a referendum. The petition must be signed by the correct number of people (using the 5% figures for your district listed above) and delivered to a council’s ‘principal office’.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Lincolnshire
    CENTRAL LINCOLNSHIRE STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT JANUARY 2018 Note: This version of the Central Lincolnshire Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) was adopted by the Central Lincolnshire Joint Strategic Planning Committee on 22nd January 2018. It replaces the previous SCI adopted in June 2016. This 2018 version is almost identical to the 2016 version but adds a contents page and a section relating to neighbourhood plans in accordance with the requirements of the Neighbourhood Planning Act 2017. The remainder of the document is unchanged. CONTENTS 1. Introduction………………………………………………….. 1 2. Our Commitment to Meaningful Consultation…………… 1 3. Local Plans………………………………………………….. 2 4. Supplementary Planning Documents……………………… 4 5. Planning Applications………………………………………. 5 6. Neighbourhood Planning……………………………………. 7 Glossary………………………..…………………………………….. 17 Contact Details……………………...……………………………….. 18 CENTRAL LINCOLNSHIRE STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 1. Introduction This Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) outlines how the Central Lincolnshire Joint Strategic Planning Committee expects to involve and consult the public and stakeholders when preparing planning policy documents, namely local plans (page 2) and supplementary planning documents (page 4). It also outlines how and when the public can have their say on planning applications (page 5) and provides brief What is the Central Lincolnshire Joint commentary on neighbourhood planning (page Strategic Planning Committee? 8). The Central Lincolnshire Joint Strategic The commitments made in this SCI are legally Planning Committee (CLJSPC) is binding on the CLJPC and its constituent district responsible for the strategic planning authorities. The County Council also has a duty to policy functions of the four constituent prepare and maintain its own separate SCI, which authorities of the Central Lincolnshire will mostly cover planning consultations related to area, namely the City of Lincoln Council, Minerals and Waste proposals and policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoarding Guidance for Frontline Staff
    Contents Guidance for Frontline Staff 1 Overview of the Hoarding Pathway 2 Notification Process / Flowchart 3 – 5 Hoarding Characteristic Insights 6 – 9 Clutter Image Rating Scales 10 - 16 Assessment Tool Guidelines 17 Example Questions & Engagement Tips 19 Further Advice / Self Help / Support 20 - 22 Useful Contact Details Overview of the Hoarding Pathway This document is designed to help any frontline member of staff who would like further guidance on hoarding identified within a person's home, who you may be working with. The triangle below gives you an idea of the support / signposting that can be sourced according to the levels of clutter within the property. There is also a notification process on the next page, designed to help you to help us in identifying people who require further support. We always encourage multi-agency working and where possible, the hoarding advocate would like to be made aware of any properties cluttered at a rating 4+. Please email [email protected] uk.org if you have any further questions or require further advice. Page | 1 Notification Process Page | 2 Hoarding Insight Characteristics Use this guide as a baseline to describe the person's attitude towards their hoarding. The Frontline member of staff will be required to provide additional information in the notification (if it is available at this time) to enable a tailored approach that is relevant to the person in question. GOOD OR FAIR INSIGHT The person recognises that hoarding-related beliefs and behaviours (relating to difficulty discarding items, clutter or excessive acquisition) are problematic. The customer recognises these behaviours in themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • West Lindsey News and County News
    County News logo Final artwork PMS 583 23C 0M 100Y 17K PMS 444 15C 0M 15Y 42K PMS 377 40C 0M 100Y 38K PMS 583 contents23C 0M 100Y 17K summer 2014 3 News in brief 7 Four pages of stories from across Lincolnshire 7 Castle countdown! New-look Lincoln Castle will give tourism a boost Leader ’s welcome... 8 Special feature: Thanks for everything! One hundred years ago this August, Britain was Meet the winners of our plunged into the most terrible conflict the world 2014 Good Citizens Awards 8 had ever seen. The dramatic consequences of the First World War Meeting our children s needs were felt not only on the front line, but also on the home 10 front, including here in Lincolnshire. Improved services for children In a special feature in this County News, we tell the with additional needs tragic story of Lincoln mother Amy Beechey, who lost five of her eight sons in the conflict – the highest toll on any single British family. 11 Tips for better recycling We also highlight a superb exhibition at the Museum How to avoid contaminating recycling by mistake of Lincolnshire Life called 1914, A Call to Arms for Lincolnshire – the first of a series we’re planning over Special feature: Lest we forget the next four years. 16 16 On a lighter note, the summer months offer a County events 100 years after the fabulous number of events – large and small, weird and outbreak of WW1 wonderful – in every corner of the county. With that in mind, we’ve included a special three- page Out and About section at the back of the magazine, 19 Giving something back with something to suit every taste.
    [Show full text]
  • Destination Management Plan
    DESTINATION MANAGEMENT PLAN Background The Lincolnshire Wolds is a rolling landscape and was designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) in 1973 and is the highest area of land in Eastern England between Yorkshire and Kent and covers some 560 kilometres. The Lincolnshire Wolds AONB cuts across the council boundaries of East Lindsey District Council, West Lindsey District Council, North and North East Lincolnshire Councils. The Lincolnshire Wolds AONB is surrounded by a number of distinctive historic market towns and includes: Alford, Brigg, Caistor, Horncastle, Louth, Market Rasen and Spilsby. The combination of the Lincolnshire Wolds AONB and market towns best describes the visitor destination i.e., the natural character area of the Lincolnshire Wolds and market towns. The visitor offer in the Lincolnshire Wolds and Market Towns is diverse from outdoor pursuits through to heritage and cultural interests. Lincolnshire is a rich agricultural county and home to many talented food producers who grow and make fantastic foods. The Lincolnshire Wolds is at the heart of the county so visitors are never far away from sampling great food and drink. This is further complemented by the wide range of visitor attractions and activities for visitors to experience. The visitor economy in East Lindsey is estimated to be worth £584 million and the area welcomed over 4.5 million visitors in 2015. It is further estimated that approximately a fifth of this economic activity is attributed to the rural visitor economy, generating over £100 million for the rural visitor economy but this does not take into account tourism related economic activity in West Lindsey, North Lincolnshire and North East Lincolnshire so the true value of sector will far exceed this figure.
    [Show full text]
  • Gainsborough (West Lindsey) Growth Point
    West Lindsey District Council Gainsborough (West Lindsey) Growth Point Programme of Development 2008-2026 October 2008 1 GAINSBOROUGH, WEST LINDSEY, LINCOLNSHIRE Appraisal Template for Programmes of Development 2008 Growth Location: Gainsborough Local Authorities in West Lindsey District Council, Lincolnshire County partnership Council Region: East Midlands Delivery Mechanism (eg LA or LA LDV) Key contact for programme: Suzanne Fysh Lead authority for the West Lindsey District Council payment of grant 2009/10 2010/11 Total Funding Requested: Capital £500,000 £850,000 £1,350,000 Revenue £1,100,000 £155,000 £1,255,000 Total £1,600,000 £1,005,000 £2,605,000 Name Commented Name Commented on draft (Y/N) on draft (Y/N) CLG Assessors GO Assessors GLA Assessors Process Moderator 2 CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY AND FORWARD............................................................................. 1 2 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 3 2.1 BACKGROUND TO THE GAINSBOROUGH (WEST LINDSEY) GROWTH POINT................................................................................................ 3 2.2 THE PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT ............................................................. 4 2.3 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER STRATEGIES.................................................. 5 2.4 VISION AND OBJECTIVES FOR GAINSBOROUGH........................................ 9 3 RATIONALE FOR GROWTH ........................................................................... 10 3.1 WHY IS GAINSBOROUGH
    [Show full text]
  • Contaminated Land Strategy Review [2012]
    CONTAMINATED LAND STRATEGY ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ACT 1990 – PART 2A Final Version: December 2019 Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy West Lindsey District Council December 2019 Report Details Client West Lindsey District Council Report Title Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy Review Date December 2019 Previous Strategy Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy [June 2012] Documents Status of Document Committee Approval Quality Assurance Issue Issue Technical Status Comments Author Authorised No. Date Review Chris Everitt Principal Consultant Delta Simons Environmental Consultants Ltd xxxxxxx December 1 Final - Principal 2019 Consultant Delta Simons Environmental Sarah Gamble Consultants Andy Gray Ltd Housing and Senior Environmental Environmental Enforcement Health Manager Practitioner West Lindsey West Lindsey District Council District Council Page | 2 Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy West Lindsey District Council December 2019 Enquiries Any enquiries regarding this strategy should be addressed to: West Lindsey District Council Housing and Environmental Enforcement Guildhall Marshall’s Yard Gainsborough DN21 2NA Tel. 01427 676676 Email. Online Form is here Page | 3 Contaminated Land Inspection Strategy West Lindsey District Council December 2019 Foreword As Chair of the Council’s Licensing and Regulatory Committee I am pleased that this strategy sets out how the Council will carry out its role in relation to Contaminated Land over the next five years, 2019 to 2024. Whilst often unseen, this work is essential in ensuring that Council meets its obligations and contributes to reducing the risk to human health presented by Contaminated Land. Our varied, growing and changing district will benefit from the work that has been undertaken and I know it will provide much needed information and support to those that will utilise it.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston Borough Council Council Size Submission
    Boston Borough Council Council Size Submission Local Government Boundary Commission for England Submitted October 2011 0 Executive Summary We have based this submission on the principle of creating a Council Size which functions effectively. We have considered the factors that influence council size, as set out by the Local Government Boundary Commission for England (LGBCE): • The decision making process • Quasi-judicial processes – e.g. planning and licensing – what is the workload and how is it managed • The scrutiny process – what is scrutinised and how is the total scrutiny workload managed • The representative role of the elected member Since the last review in October 1996 the Council moved to a Leader/Cabinet model thus reducing the level of involvement necessary for decision making and leading to a suggestion that we could once again sustain a reduction in the number of councillors. We have also reviewed the supporting committee structures in order to strengthen the scrutiny role. Although official statistics suggest that our population is approximately 61,000 we believe that this figure could be at least 10,000 higher. With this in mind we believe that our current electorate of 47,293 which is an average ration of 1:1478 per councillor could be in the region of 2,500 higher. We have taken into consideration the criteria used to determine the number of councillors and in particular: • Growth since the last boundary review and forecast of future electorate o We are not anticipating a significant rise in the electorate based on the information from the past five years and the fact that there are no new or large scale developments identified in the local plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Information and Faqs
    Scotter – Flood Risk Information and FAQs 1. Which organisation is responsible for my stretch of river? Environment Agency The Environment Agency carries out maintenance, improvement or construction work on main rivers to manage flood risk. We are also responsible for working in partnership with the Met Office to provide flood forecasts and warnings. The main river map (link below) shows which rivers are designated as ‘main rivers’. The River Eau at Scotter is a main river. Other rivers are called ‘ordinary watercourses’. Lead Local Flood Authorities, District Councils and Internal Drainage Boards carry out flood risk management on ordinary watercourses. To see a map of the Main River network, please visit: https://environment.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=17cd53dfc524433 980cc333726a56386 Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) LLFAs are county councils and unitary authorities. They lead on managing and investigating the risk of flooding from surface water, groundwater and ordinary watercourses (smaller watercourses) and support community recovery. To contact your LLFA, please see: Lincolnshire County Council 01522 782070 www.lincolnshire.gov.uk/flood-risk-management/Managing-flood-risk Internal Drainage Board Each Internal Drainage Board (IDB) is a public body that manages water levels in an area, known as an internal drainage district, where there is a special need for drainage. IDBs undertake works to reduce flood risk to people and property, and manage water levels for agricultural and environmental needs within their district. However, not all areas are covered by an IDB. There are 112 IDBs in England. They play a key role in reducing flood risk to over 600,000 people and nearly 900,000 properties.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Club: £10: 4 Ian Till £5: 12 Alan Payne Newson. Grimsby Minster
    LINCOLN DIOCESAN GUILD NEWSSHEET AND DIARY. JULY 2019 News from June: Guild wide: Ringing for D Day landings commemoration : QPs were rung at North Rauceby, Billingborough, Horbling, St Mary le Wigford and Potterhanworth. In addition, special ringing was organised at Frampton and Coningsby. Ridgman Trophy: The Lincolnshire team were placed 6 th of 8 teams this year, Hertfordshire being the winners for the 2 nd consecutive year in what was a high quality competition. Young Ringers’ Summer Festival – Saturday 31 st August Please encourage all the young ringers to come to the Festival, and help them to make transport arrangements. Starting at Grimsby Minster at around 1030, various other towers and games are the order of the day. Adult ringers will also be able to ring (as long as they are young at heart!) National Youth Striking Competition. Good luck to the team of young ringers, Lincolnshire Poachers, going to Liverpool. 100 club: £10: 4 Ian Till £5: 12 Alan Payne News from the branches: Eastern: Tom Palmer was remembered in many ways – QPs were rung at Martin, Freiston and Butterwick, the latter was listened to by his daughter Anne who introduced him to bell ringing. The winners of the branch striking competition were the Boston team who dedicated their win to Tom. The competition was held at Croft, with Sylvia Taylor as judge. Beautiful weather was enjoyed by the roughly 40 ringers present. Ingoldmells were runners-up. A QP was organised and rung at Freiston to mark 117 years to the day since the augmentation of the bells to 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Adopted Central Lincolnshire Local Plan
    CENTRAL LINCOLNSHIRE Local Plan Adopted April 2017 Central Lincolnshire | Local Plan - Adopted April 2017 Foreword Ensuring a flourishing future for Central Lincolnshire Central Lincolnshire is characterised by its diverse and enticing landscape. The magnificent city of Lincoln is embedded within our beautiful landscape and is surrounded by a network of picturesque towns and villages: these places, along with the social and economic opportunities in the area, make Central Lincolnshire a fantastic place to live, work and visit. But there is so much potential to make Central Lincolnshire an even better place. An even better place to live, with quality homes people can afford, easier access to shops, services and facilities, and new thriving communities, which are welcoming and safe. An even better place to work, where new facilities and infrastructure mean that businesses choose to expand or relocate here, bringing jobs and stimulating investment. An even better place to visit, a place where people choose to come to enjoy our nature, our history, our shops, our eateries and attractions, while at the same time significantly contributing to our rural and urban economies. A new Local Plan for Central Lincolnshire can do this. This is the adopted Local Plan for Central Lincolnshire. It was prepared with the benefit of your very helpful comments we received at various draft stages. Inside this adopted Local Plan are policies for the growth and regeneration of Central Lincolnshire over the next 20 years and beyond, including sites allocated for development and other areas designated for protection. The policies within the Local Plan will make sure that our settlements grow in the right way, ensure we have homes and employment where we need them, and ensure our new communities are sustainable, accessible and inclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1. Glossary
    Appendix 1. Glossary Adoption: Core Strategy: The official confirmation of a Development Plan or Local Development A framework Development Plan Document which sets out the long-term Document as having statutory status by a Local Planning Authority. spatial vision for the local planning authority’s area, with objectives and policies to deliver that vision. AOD: Above Ordnance Datum. Countryside Stewardship Schemes (CSS): These schemes enabled farmers to be paid grants to follow more traditional Agricultural Intensification: farming methods that enhance the landscape, encourage wildlife and A change in farming practices where higher inputs and more rigorous protect historical features. They have now been replaced by Environmental methods result in a higher outputs of crops. Stewardship (ES). Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB): Dendritic: A national landscape conservation designation which protects areas of A hierarchical branching pattern, often found in fluvial systems with a shallow acknowledged special landscape value. gradient. Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP): Detractors: These are plans which recognise, highlight and provide a framework for A feature or element which can generally be agreed upon as reducing the protecting individual species and habitats at the national, regional and local value or quality ascribed to a view or landscape. level. Development Plan Document (DPD): Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE): Spatial planning documents that form part of the LDF. An organisation which campaigns to protect and conserve the countryside and desirable elements of rural life including dark night skies, tranquillity, Dyke: natural and historic environments and also rural landscape character. A ditch type construction for the drainage of water from the surrounding land, often embanked by excavated material from its construction and Common Agricultural Policy (CAP): maintenance.
    [Show full text]