Characterization of Porcine Enterocytes and Their Susceptibility to Rotavirus

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Characterization of Porcine Enterocytes and Their Susceptibility to Rotavirus Characterization of porcine enterocytes and their susceptibility to rotavirus Word count: 8979 Yana Rommens Student number: 01710629 Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Hans Nauwynck Supervisor: Dr. Sebastiaan Theuns Supervisor: PhD candidate: Nick Vereecke A dissertation submitted to Ghent University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Veterinary Medicine Academic year: 2019 - 2020 Ghent University, its employees and/or students, give no warranty that the information provided in this thesis is accurate or exhaustive, nor that the content of this thesis will not constitute or result in any infringement of third-party rights. Ghent University, its employees and/or students do not accept any liability or responsibility for any use which may be made of the content or information given in the thesis, nor for any reliance which may be placed on any advice or information provided in this thesis. Preamble Part of this thesis was supposed to be based on research under the supervision of the Department of Virology. In April 2020, three weeks of experiments were planned to try to shed light on the complicated pathways and morphology of enterocytes in the small intestines of neonatal and older piglets. Finding differences in morphology, expression of receptors and several other factors could be a useful in finding exactly what makes young animals more susceptible to rotavirus. Due to the Covid-19 pandemic all research projects were cancelled and this thesis is now a literature study. As not much is known about the exact reasons why young animals are more sensitive to rotavirus, the second part is much shorter than intended as a result of the absence of data from my own research project. Preface I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Hans Nauwynck for giving me the chance to get to know the lab of virology in the first semester. I would also like to express my thanks to Dr. Sebastiaan Theuns and PhD- candidate Nick Vereecke for their guidance and explanation of the different techniques used in the lab and allowing me to learn them. Their never seizing enthusiasm for their work motivated me and I learned so much. I would also like to thank them for finding the time to correct my thesis and helping me along with their suggestions. In addition to this, I am also grateful for the help of technical assistent Marthe Pauwels who found the time to help me with the different techniques. Finally, I would also like to thank my friends for always offering support. Not only in these last months, but throughout the whole process. Table of contents 1. Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 English summary ............................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Dutch summary ................................................................................................................................. 6 2. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 7 3. Rotavirus ............................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1 Structure of the virus ......................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.1 Genome ..................................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.2 Viral particle ............................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Classification..................................................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Epidemiology .................................................................................................................................. 10 3.3.1 Zoonotic potential .................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Replication cycle ............................................................................................................................. 11 3.5 Pathogenesis .................................................................................................................................. 13 3.6 Pathology and clinical signs.............................................................................................................. 13 3.6.1 Macroscopic lesions .................................................................................................................. 13 3.6.2 Histology .................................................................................................................................. 14 3.7 Immunology ................................................................................................................................... 14 3.7.1 Innate immune response ........................................................................................................... 14 3.7.2 Acquired immune response ....................................................................................................... 15 3.7.3 Passive immune response ......................................................................................................... 15 3.8 Prevention ...................................................................................................................................... 15 3.8.1 Hygiene measures .................................................................................................................... 16 3.9 Vaccination ..................................................................................................................................... 16 4. Characteristics of the small intestine ..................................................................................................... 18 4.1 General anatomy of the digestive tract ............................................................................................. 18 4.2 Structure of the small intestine ......................................................................................................... 18 4.2.1 Cells of the epithelium .............................................................................................................. 18 4.2.2 Cell-cell adhesions .................................................................................................................... 19 4.2.3 Cell-matrix adhesions ................................................................................................................ 20 4.3 Changes in small intestine due to aging ............................................................................................ 21 4.3.1 Postpartum .............................................................................................................................. 21 4.3.2 Weaning .................................................................................................................................. 21 4.4 Age-dependent susceptibility............................................................................................................ 22 4.4.1 Influence of TLR3 ...................................................................................................................... 22 4.4.2 Inflammasome ......................................................................................................................... 22 4.4.2 Maturing of gastro-intestinal tract and cells ................................................................................ 23 5. Discussion ........................................................................................................................................... 24 6. References ........................................................................................................................................... 25 1. Summary 1.1 English summary One of the most important problems in piglets is diarrhea. In the gestation unit and shortly after weaning piglets are utmost susceptible to it. Diarrhea can have multiple causes such as viruses, bacteria and parasites. Porcine rotaviruses (RVs) are often a cause of acute viral gastro-enteritis (Theuns, 2015). According to a study conducted by Debouck and Pensaert (1983) the virus is present in almost every farm and will infect almost every pig in the course of their life. The target cells for rotaviruses are the enterocytes of the small intestines. The epithelium of the small intestine consists of different cell types, each with their own function. In addition to this, cell-cell adhesions form a barrier against pathogens including rotaviruses since receptors are found on the basolateral sides of enterocytes and with intact cell-cell adhesions these receptors are less easy to reach. Other factors such as Toll-like receptor 3 seem to play an important role insusceptibility of enterocytes to rotavirus. The intestines are a complex and intriguing part of the gastro-intestinal system and further extensive research is necessary to discover and comprehend all possible receptors, pathways and other factors and mechanisms. Understanding all this could lead to a better healthcare and therefore better production results in intensive farming. 1.2 Dutch summary
Recommended publications
  • Equine Rotavirus Strain Arg/E706/2008 VP7 (VP7) Gene, Partial Cds Genbank: GU373939.1 FASTA Graphics Popset
    Equine rotavirus strain Arg/E706/2008 VP7 (VP7) gene, partial cds GenBank: GU373939.1 FASTA Graphics PopSet Go to: LOCUS GU373939 972 bp RNA linear VRL 25-JUL-2016 DEFINITION Equine rotavirus strain Arg/E706/2008 VP7 (VP7) gene, partial cds. ACCESSION GU373939 VERSION GU373939.1 KEYWORDS . SOURCE Equine rotavirus ORGANISM Equine rotavirus Viruses; Riboviria; Orthornavirae; Duplornaviricota; Resentoviricetes; Reovirales; Reoviridae; Sedoreovirinae; Rotavirus; unclassified Rotavirus. REFERENCE 1 (bases 1 to 972) AUTHORS Garaicoechea,L., Mino,S.O., Barrandeguy,M. and Parreno,V. TITLE Molecular Characterization of Equine rotavirus Circulating in Sport Horses of Argentina During a 17-year Period (1992-2008) JOURNAL Unpublished REFERENCE 2 (bases 1 to 972) AUTHORS Garaicoechea,L., Mino,S.O., Barrandeguy,M. and Parreno,V. TITLE Direct Submission JOURNAL Submitted (29-DEC-2009) Virology Institute, INTA, Dr Nicolas Repetto y de Los Reseros s/n, Castelar, Buenos Aires 1712, ArgentinaFEATURES Location/Qualifiers source 1..972 /organism="Equine rotavirus" /mol_type="genomic RNA" /strain="Arg/E706/2008" /isolation_source="fecal sample" /host="equine" /db_xref="taxon:10937" /country="Argentina: Buenos Aires" /collection_date="2008" /note="genotype: G14" gene 7..>972 /gene="VP7" CDS 7..>972 /gene="VP7" /codon_start=1 /product="VP7" /protein_id="AEF33475.1" /translation="MYGIEYTTILTFLISLILLNYILQLLTRIMDFIIYRFLLIIVLL SPFLNAQNYGINLPITGSMDTAYVNSTQENIFLTSTLCLYYPTEAATQIDDSSWKDTI SQLFLTKGWPTGSVYLKEYTDIASFSIDPQLYCDYNVVLMKYDEALQLDMSELADLIL NEWLCNPMDITLYYYQQTDEANKWISMGSSCTIKVCPLNTQTLGIGCLTTNVATFEEV
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Taxonomic Update for Phylum Negarnaviricota (Riboviria: Orthornavirae), Including the Large Orders Bunyavirales and Mononegavirales
    Archives of Virology https://doi.org/10.1007/s00705-020-04731-2 VIROLOGY DIVISION NEWS 2020 taxonomic update for phylum Negarnaviricota (Riboviria: Orthornavirae), including the large orders Bunyavirales and Mononegavirales Jens H. Kuhn1 · Scott Adkins2 · Daniela Alioto3 · Sergey V. Alkhovsky4 · Gaya K. Amarasinghe5 · Simon J. Anthony6,7 · Tatjana Avšič‑Županc8 · María A. Ayllón9,10 · Justin Bahl11 · Anne Balkema‑Buschmann12 · Matthew J. Ballinger13 · Tomáš Bartonička14 · Christopher Basler15 · Sina Bavari16 · Martin Beer17 · Dennis A. Bente18 · Éric Bergeron19 · Brian H. Bird20 · Carol Blair21 · Kim R. Blasdell22 · Steven B. Bradfute23 · Rachel Breyta24 · Thomas Briese25 · Paul A. Brown26 · Ursula J. Buchholz27 · Michael J. Buchmeier28 · Alexander Bukreyev18,29 · Felicity Burt30 · Nihal Buzkan31 · Charles H. Calisher32 · Mengji Cao33,34 · Inmaculada Casas35 · John Chamberlain36 · Kartik Chandran37 · Rémi N. Charrel38 · Biao Chen39 · Michela Chiumenti40 · Il‑Ryong Choi41 · J. Christopher S. Clegg42 · Ian Crozier43 · John V. da Graça44 · Elena Dal Bó45 · Alberto M. R. Dávila46 · Juan Carlos de la Torre47 · Xavier de Lamballerie38 · Rik L. de Swart48 · Patrick L. Di Bello49 · Nicholas Di Paola50 · Francesco Di Serio40 · Ralf G. Dietzgen51 · Michele Digiaro52 · Valerian V. Dolja53 · Olga Dolnik54 · Michael A. Drebot55 · Jan Felix Drexler56 · Ralf Dürrwald57 · Lucie Dufkova58 · William G. Dundon59 · W. Paul Duprex60 · John M. Dye50 · Andrew J. Easton61 · Hideki Ebihara62 · Toufc Elbeaino63 · Koray Ergünay64 · Jorlan Fernandes195 · Anthony R. Fooks65 · Pierre B. H. Formenty66 · Leonie F. Forth17 · Ron A. M. Fouchier48 · Juliana Freitas‑Astúa67 · Selma Gago‑Zachert68,69 · George Fú Gāo70 · María Laura García71 · Adolfo García‑Sastre72 · Aura R. Garrison50 · Aiah Gbakima73 · Tracey Goldstein74 · Jean‑Paul J. Gonzalez75,76 · Anthony Grifths77 · Martin H. Groschup12 · Stephan Günther78 · Alexandro Guterres195 · Roy A.
    [Show full text]
  • The LUCA and Its Complex Virome in Another Recent Synthesis, We Examined the Origins of the Replication and Structural Mart Krupovic , Valerian V
    PERSPECTIVES archaea that form several distinct, seemingly unrelated groups16–18. The LUCA and its complex virome In another recent synthesis, we examined the origins of the replication and structural Mart Krupovic , Valerian V. Dolja and Eugene V. Koonin modules of viruses and posited a ‘chimeric’ scenario of virus evolution19. Under this Abstract | The last universal cellular ancestor (LUCA) is the most recent population model, the replication machineries of each of of organisms from which all cellular life on Earth descends. The reconstruction of the four realms derive from the primordial the genome and phenotype of the LUCA is a major challenge in evolutionary pool of genetic elements, whereas the major biology. Given that all life forms are associated with viruses and/or other mobile virion structural proteins were acquired genetic elements, there is no doubt that the LUCA was a host to viruses. Here, by from cellular hosts at different stages of evolution giving rise to bona fide viruses. projecting back in time using the extant distribution of viruses across the two In this Perspective article, we combine primary domains of life, bacteria and archaea, and tracing the evolutionary this recent work with observations on the histories of some key virus genes, we attempt a reconstruction of the LUCA virome. host ranges of viruses in each of the four Even a conservative version of this reconstruction suggests a remarkably complex realms, along with deeper reconstructions virome that already included the main groups of extant viruses of bacteria and of virus evolution, to tentatively infer archaea. We further present evidence of extensive virus evolution antedating the the composition of the virome of the last universal cellular ancestor (LUCA; also LUCA.
    [Show full text]
  • Article Download (79)
    wjpls, 2020, Vol. 6, Issue 6, 152-161 Review Article ISSN 2454-2229 Pratik et al. World Journal of Pharmaceutical World Journaland Life of Pharmaceutica Sciencesl and Life Science WJPLS www.wjpls.org SJIF Impact Factor: 6.129 THE NOVEL CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19) CAUSATIVE AGENT FOR HUMAN RESPIRATORY DISEASES Pratik V. Malvade1*, Rutik V. Malvade2, Shubham P. Varpe3 and Prathamesh B. Kadu3 1Pravara Rural College of Pharmacy, Pravaranagar, 413736, Dist. - Ahmednagar (M.S.) India. 2Pravara Rural Engineering College, Loni, 413736, Dist. - Ahmednagar (M.S.) India. 3Ashvin College Of Pharmacy, Manchi Hill, Ashvi Bk., 413714, Dist.- Ahmednagar (M.S.) India. *Corresponding Author: Pratik V. Malvade Pravara Rural College of Pharmacy, Pravaranagar, 413736, Dist. - Ahmednagar (M.S.) India. Article Received on 08/04/2020 Article Revised on 29/04/2020 Article Accepted on 19/05/2020 ABSTRACT The newly founded human coronavirus has named as Covid-19. The full form of Covid-19 is “Co-Corona, vi- virus and d- disease”. The Covid-19 is also named as 2019-nCoV because of it was firstly identified at the end of 2019. The coronavirus are the group of various types of viruses i.e. some have positive-sense, single stranded RNA and they are covered within the envelope made up of protein. Still now days seven human coronaviruses are identified are Nl 63, 229E, OC43, HKU1, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and latest Covid-19 also known as SARS-CoV-2. From above all, the SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV causes the highest outbreak but the outbreak of Covid-19 is much more than the other any virus.
    [Show full text]
  • Latest Ncbi-Taxonomist Docker Image Can Be Pulled from Registry.Gitlab.Com/Janpb/ Ncbi-Taxonomist:Latest
    ncbi-taxonomist Documentation Release 1.2.1+8580b9b Jan P Buchmann 2020-11-15 Contents: 1 Installation 3 2 Basic functions 5 3 Cookbook 35 4 Container 39 5 Frequently Asked Questions 49 6 Module references 51 7 Synopsis 63 8 Requirements and Dependencies 65 9 Contact 67 10 Indices and tables 69 Python Module Index 71 Index 73 i ii ncbi-taxonomist Documentation, Release 1.2.1+8580b9b 1.2.1+8580b9b :: 2020-11-15 Contents: 1 ncbi-taxonomist Documentation, Release 1.2.1+8580b9b 2 Contents: CHAPTER 1 Installation Content • Local pip install (no root required) • Global pip install (root required) ncbi-taxonomist is available on PyPi via pip. If you use another Python package manager than pip, please consult its documentation. If you are installing ncbi-taxonomist on a non-Linux system, consider the propsed methods as guidelines and adjust as required. Important: Please note If some of the proposed commands are unfamiliar to you, don’t just invoke them but look them up, e.g. in man pages or search online. Should you be unfamiliar with pip, check pip -h Note: Python 3 vs. Python 2 Due to co-existing Python 2 and Python 3, some installation commands may be invoked slighty different. In addition, development and support for Python 2 did stop January 2020 and should not be used anymore. ncbi-taxonomist requires Python >= 3.8. Depending on your OS and/or distribution, the default pip command can install either Python 2 or Python 3 packages. Make sure you use pip for Python 3, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Avian Orthoreovirus Segment S4, Complete Genome NCBI Reference Sequence: NC 015135.1
    Avian orthoreovirus segment S4, complete genome NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_015135.1 FASTA Graphics Go to: LOCUS NC_015135 1192 bp RNA linear VRL 13-AUG-2018 DEFINITION Avian orthoreovirus segment S4, complete genome. ACCESSION NC_015135 VERSION NC_015135.1 DBLINK BioProject: PRJNA485481 KEYWORDS RefSeq. SOURCE Avian orthoreovirus ORGANISM Avian orthoreovirus Viruses; Riboviria; Orthornavirae; Duplornaviricota; Resentoviricetes; Reovirales; Reoviridae; Spinareovirinae; Orthoreovirus. REFERENCE 1 AUTHORS Banyai,K., Dandar,E., Dorsey,K.M., Mato,T. and Palya,V. TITLE The genomic constellation of a novel avian orthoreovirus strain associated with runting-stunting syndrome in broilers JOURNAL Virus Genes 42 (1), 82-89 (2011) PUBMED 21116842 REFERENCE 2 (bases 1 to 1192) CONSRTM NCBI Genome Project TITLE Direct Submission JOURNAL Submitted (11-FEB-2011) National Center for Biotechnology Information, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA REFERENCE 3 (bases 1 to 1192) AUTHORS Banyai,K. TITLE Direct Submission JOURNAL Submitted (29-SEP-2010) Banyai K., Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Veterinary Medical Research Institute, Hungaria krt. 21., Budapest, H-1143, HUNGARY COMMENT PROVISIONAL REFSEQ: This record has not yet been subject to final NCBI review. The reference sequence is identical to FR694200. COMPLETENESS: full length. FEATURES Location/Qualifiers source 1..1192 /organism="Avian orthoreovirus" /mol_type="genomic RNA" /strain="AVS-B" /db_xref="taxon:38170" /segment="S4" /country="USA" gene 24..1127 /gene="sigma-NS" /locus_tag="AOrVsS4_gpp1" /db_xref="GeneID:10220435"
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text Article
    SJIF Impact Factor: 5.464 WORLD JOURNAL OF ADVANCE ISSN: 2457-0400 Rajeev et al. Volume:Page 1 of4. 51 HEALTHCARE RESEARCH Issue: 4. Page N. 47-51 Year: 2020 Review Article www.wjahr.com STRUCTURE & EVOLUTION OF COVID 19 (SARS-COV-2) Dr. Rajeev Shah*1, Reena Mehta2, Ashvika Mistry3, Manali Patel4, Rajendra Choudhary5 and Vivek Trivedi6 1Head & Professor, Microbiology Department, Pacific Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajesthan, India. 2Expert in Genetics & Cancer/Expert in DNA Technology, University of New South Wales, Australia. 3Turor, NaMo Medical College, Microbiology Department, Silvassa, UT, India. 4Ex Intern GMERS, Sola, Ahmedabad/Cardiovascular consultants of Northwest Indiana, Munster, Indiana, USA. 5Assistant Professor, Ophthalmology Department, AIIMS, Udaipur. 6Tutor, Microbiology Department, Pacific Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajesthan, India. Received date: 28 April 2020 Revised date: 18 May 2020 Accepted date: 08 June 2020 *Corresponding author: Dr. Rajeev Shah Head & Professor, Microbiology Department, Pacific Medical College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajesthan, India. ABSTRACT Coronaviridae is a family of enveloped, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA viruses. The viral genome is 26–32 kilobases in length. The particles are typically decorated with large (~20 nm), club- or petal-shaped surface projections (the "peplomers" or "spikes"), which in electron micrographs of spherical particles create an image reminiscent of the solar corona. Coronaviruses are a group of related RNA viruses that cause diseases in mammals and birds. In humans, these viruses cause respiratory tract infections that can range from mild to lethal. Mild illnesses include some cases of the common cold (which is also caused by other viruses, predominantly rhinoviruses), while more lethal varieties can cause SARS, MERS, and COVID-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Virology Is That the Study of Viruses ? Submicroscopic, Parasitic Particles
    Current research in Virology & Retrovirology 2021, Vol.4, Issue 3 Editorial Bahman Khalilidehkordi Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Iran mobile genetic elements of cells (such as transposons, Editorial retrotransposons or plasmids) that became encapsulated in protein capsids, acquired the power to “break free” from Virology is that the study of viruses – submicroscopic, the host cell and infect other cells. Of particular interest parasitic particles of genetic material contained during a here is mimivirus, a huge virus that infects amoebae and protein coat – and virus-like agents. It focuses on the sub- encodes much of the molecular machinery traditionally sequent aspects of viruses: their structure, classification associated with bacteria. Two possibilities are that it’s a and evolution, their ways to infect and exploit host cells for simplified version of a parasitic prokaryote or it originated copy , their interaction with host organism physiology and as an easier virus that acquired genes from its host. The immunity, the diseases they cause, the techniques to iso- evolution of viruses, which frequently occurs together with late and culture them, and their use in research and ther- the evolution of their hosts, is studied within the field of apy. Virology is a subfield of microbiology.Structure and viral evolution. While viruses reproduce and evolve, they’re classification of Virus: A major branch of virology is virus doing not engage in metabolism, don’t move, and depend classification. Viruses are often classified consistent with on variety cell for copy . The often-debated question of the host cell they infect: animal viruses, plant viruses, fun- whether or not they’re alive or not could also be a matter gal viruses, and bacteriophages (viruses infecting bacte- of definition that does not affect the biological reality of vi- ria, which include the foremost complex viruses).
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus: Detailed Taxonomy
    Coronavirus: Detailed taxonomy Coronaviruses are in the realm: Riboviria; phylum: Incertae sedis; and order: Nidovirales. The Coronaviridae family gets its name, in part, because the virus surface is surrounded by a ring of projections that appear like a solar corona when viewed through an electron microscope. Taxonomically, the main Coronaviridae subfamily – Orthocoronavirinae – is subdivided into alpha (formerly referred to as type 1 or phylogroup 1), beta (formerly referred to as type 2 or phylogroup 2), delta, and gamma coronavirus genera. Using molecular clock analysis, investigators have estimated the most common ancestor of all coronaviruses appeared in about 8,100 BC, and those of alphacoronavirus, betacoronavirus, gammacoronavirus, and deltacoronavirus appeared in approximately 2,400 BC, 3,300 BC, 2,800 BC, and 3,000 BC, respectively. These investigators posit that bats and birds are ideal hosts for the coronavirus gene source, bats for alphacoronavirus and betacoronavirus, and birds for gammacoronavirus and deltacoronavirus. Coronaviruses are usually associated with enteric or respiratory diseases in their hosts, although hepatic, neurologic, and other organ systems may be affected with certain coronaviruses. Genomic and amino acid sequence phylogenetic trees do not offer clear lines of demarcation among corona virus genus, lineage (subgroup), host, and organ system affected by disease, so information is provided below in rough descending order of the phylogenetic length of the reported genome. Subgroup/ Genus Lineage Abbreviation
    [Show full text]
  • A Tool for Hierarchical Clustering, Core Gene Detection and Annotation of (Prokaryotic) Viruses Cristina Moraru
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.14.448304; this version posted June 14, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. VirClust – a tool for hierarchical clustering, core gene detection and annotation of (prokaryotic) viruses Cristina Moraru Institute for Chemistry and Biology of the Marine Environment, Carl-von-Ossietzky –Str. 9 -11, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany; [email protected] Abstract Recent years have seen major changes in the classification criteria and taxonomy of viruses. The current classification scheme, also called “megataxonomy of viruses”, recognizes five different viral realms, defined based on the presence of viral hallmark genes. Within the realms, viruses are classified into hierarchical taxons, ideally defined by their shared genes. Therefore, there is currently a need for virus classification tools based on such shared genes / proteins. Here, VirClust is presented – a novel tool capable of performing i) hierarchical clustering of viruses based on intergenomic distances calculated from their protein cluster content, ii) identification of core proteins and iii) annotation of viral proteins. VirClust groups proteins into clusters both based on BLASTP sequence similarity, which identifies more related proteins, and also based on hidden markow models (HMM), which identifies more distantly related proteins. Furthermore, VirClust provides an integrated visualization of the hierarchical clustering tree and of the distribution of the protein content, which allows the identification of the genomic features responsible for the respective clustering. By using different intergenomic distances, the hierarchical trees produced by VirClust can be split into viral genome clusters of different taxonomic ranks.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the COVID-19 Virus SARS-Cov-2 by Compression
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.22.216242; this version posted July 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Phylogeny of the COVID-19 Virus SARS-CoV-2 by Compression Rudi L. Cilibrasi Paul M.B. Vitanyi´ Abstract We analyze the phylogeny and taxonomy of the SARS-CoV-2 virus using compression. This is a new alignment-free method called the “normalized compression distance” (NCD) method. It discovers all effective similarities based on Kolmogorov complexity. The latter being incomputable we approximate it by a good compressor such as the modern zpaq. The results comprise that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is closest to the RaTG13 virus and similar to two bat SARS-like coronaviruses bat-SL-CoVZXC21 and bat-SL-CoVZC4. The similarity is quantified and compared with the same quantified similarities among the mtDNA of certain species. We treat the question whether Pangolins are involved in the SARS-CoV-2 virus. I. INTRODUCTION In the 2019 and 2020 pandemic of the COVID-19 illness many studies use essentially two methods, alignment-based phylogenetic analyses e.g. [19], and an alignment-free machine learning approach [23]. These pointed to the origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus which causes the COVID-19 pandemic as being from bats. It is thought to belong to lineage B (Sarbecovirus) of Betacoronavirus. From phylogenetic analysis and genome organization it was identified as a SARS-like coronavirus, and to have the highest similarity to the SARS bat coronavirus RaTG13 [19] and similar to two bat SARS-like coronaviruses bat-SL-CoVZXC21 and bat- SL-CoVZC45.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial and Viral Coinfections with the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus
    microorganisms Review Bacterial and Viral Coinfections with the Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Gaspar A. Pacheco 1 , Nicolás M. S. Gálvez 1 , Jorge A. Soto 1, Catalina A. Andrade 1 and Alexis M. Kalergis 1,2,* 1 Departamento de Genética Molecular y Microbiología, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Millennium Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile; [email protected] (G.A.P.); [email protected] (N.M.S.G.); [email protected] (J.A.S.); [email protected] (C.A.A.) 2 Departamento de Endocrinología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320000, Chile * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +56-2-686-2842; Fax: +56-2-222-5515 Abstract: The human respiratory syncytial virus (hRSV) is one of the leading causes of acute lower respiratory tract infections in children under five years old. Notably, hRSV infections can give way to pneumonia and predispose to other respiratory complications later in life, such as asthma. Even though the social and economic burden associated with hRSV infections is tremendous, there are no approved vaccines to date to prevent the disease caused by this pathogen. Recently, coinfections and superinfections have turned into an active field of study, and interactions between many viral and bacterial pathogens have been studied. hRSV is not an exception since polymicrobial infections involving this virus are common, especially when illness has evolved into pneumonia. Here, we review the epidemiology and recent findings regarding the main polymicrobial infections involving hRSV and several prevalent bacterial and viral respiratory pathogens, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Streptococcus pneumoniae Haemophilus influenzae Moraxella catarrhalis Kleb- Citation: Pacheco, G.A.; Gálvez, N.M.S.; , , , , Soto, J.A.; Andrade, C.A.; Kalergis, A.M.
    [Show full text]