EXTENSIONS of REMARKS September 5, 19B4 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS HEY-Atl'ention OSHA-IT's That the Inspections Were Not Initiated Ed

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EXTENSIONS of REMARKS September 5, 19B4 EXTENSIONS of REMARKS HEY-Atl'ention OSHA-IT's That the Inspections Were Not Initiated Ed 24322 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS September 5, 19B4 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS HEY-ATl'ENTION OSHA-IT'S that the inspections were not initiated ed. The disastero·us impact which the REAGAN NOT REGAN as a result of the investigation. Five removal of the Coors facilities from attempts at inspections where no in­ the target list had on the obtaining of HON. DAVID R. OBEY spection actually took place were also warrants is discussed in memos by OF WISCONSIN included. One of the thirteen inspec­ staff of both OSHA and the office of IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES tions or attempted inspections claimed the solicitor in the Denver regional by the proposed speech can only be ac­ Wednesday, September 5, 1984 office. counted for by the fact that when the The attitude which the agency ap­ •Mr. OBEY. Mr. Speaker, productivi­ Department adds 4, 5, and 3 it gets 13 peared to have had at the time and ty at the U.S. Department of Labor something many of us have suspected the attitude expressed in this pro­ has apparently grown so rapidly in for some time. posed floor statement is that OSHA recent years that they are now volun­ The serious argument that they are rules, fines, and abatement require­ teering their services outside the exec­ trying to make is that because the ments should be reserved only for utive branch and are engaging in con­ company was uncooperative and would those employers that want them; and gressional speech writing. Regrettably, not let the agency in without a war­ if an employer does not wish to coop­ they seem to be having difficulty find­ rant and because the courts in Colora­ erate we can at least let him buy us ing Members to give their speeches. do were uncooperative in granting lunch. One such speech was written back in warrants, part of the drop in enforce­ The second point made in the pro­ early August and concerned criticism ment activity was beyond the Depart­ posed speech is that the experimenta­ which I made of the Occupational ment's control. There is, in fact, a Safety and Health Administration and good deal of merit to this argument. tion which is taking place at the Coors its enforcement policies toward the But it also raises another question; if facility where noise levels were docu­ Adolph Coors Co. Since no other the agency was in a difficult situation mented at as much 250 percent above Member of Congress seems willing to regarding warrants, how did they go Federal limits is part of a tradition insert this statement in the RECORD about resolving that problem and still started during the Carter administra­ and since considerable tax dollars were meet their responsibilities under the tion to speed up abatement of hazards. spent in its preparation, I have decid­ law? Did they attempt to put pressure The speech says the workers will be ed to put it in the RECORD myself. on the company to be more coopera­ fully protected during the NIOSH There are three major points put tive in permitting inspections? Did study. First of all, it is obvious that forward in the Department's proposed they make full scale legal efforts to the person who wrote this section of floor statement. get warrants through the courts? the proposed statement could not be­ First, they attempt to argue that the The answer to both of these ques­ lieve that the agency had done what efforts to enforce safe work rules at tions is no. While OSHA inspectors the agency in fact did. The consent Coors-owned facilities under former were denied entry to Coors factories, agreement signed between OSHA and Assistant Secretary Auchter declined high OSHA officials were frequent Coors does not provide for abatement. by only 35 percent instead of the 80- social guests at the Coors mansion. I repeat, the consent agreement that percent drop indicated in statements When OSHA inspectors were able to OSHA signed does not require Coors which I have made. I have pointed out get in to Coors plants they hardly to cut the noise levels, therefore there that between the time that auchter could be said to have thrown the book is no way that it could be argued that took over and January of this year at the company. Two deaths and a per­ this agreement in any way speeded there were only four instances where manent injury resulting from numer­ hazard removal. The second major OSHA entered Coors facilities and ous failings by the company to meet error made in this paragraph is the three of those were mandatory investi­ minimal safety standards were pun­ statement that NIOSH is conducting gations following the deaths of Coors ished with a fine of $800. Widespread the study. As the letter which I am in­ employees. This compares with 20 in­ noise violations in another factory was serting at this point in the RECORD spections in a previous 33-month time resolved by an agreement to perform a shows, NIOSH has refused to have period. study on the hearing loss of the em­ anything to do with this Coors OSHA While the Department does not di­ ployees with no requirement for abate­ experiment. rectly dispute this number they try to ment of the unlawful conditions. If The third point made in the speech develop a new statistic more to their OSHA was sending the Coors Co. a is that the agency used peer review liking. They argue that there were 13 message about noncooperation the and therefore demonstrated good inspections or attempted inspections message was nothing more than a faith in its recommendation to the during a 36-month period as opposed wink. State of Virginia that the Dan River to 20 inspections or attempted inspec­ The agency not only did not deve­ Co. be given a variance to allow a tions during a previous 36-month lope and execute an effective legal study of workers exposed to cotton period. The difference between the strategy to obtain warrants to enter dust at levels higher than those per­ two sets of numbers can be explained Coors facilities, they took deliberate mitted by Federal standards. As I as follows. Three inspections are actions to ensure that warrants would pointed out in a floor statement in added which took place after January be unobtainable. Coors facilities rated May, the Department did use peer of this year. I did not include these in as dangerous in OSHA national target­ review, but the only written review sal­ my 33-month base period for two rea­ ing procedures were removed from the vaged the proposal and the prospects sons. First, the Department could not priority inspection list. The major pur­ of gaining any useful information give me a straight or consistent answer pose for developing the national tar­ from such a study as well as the whole on inspections after January; and geting system for inspections was to idea of experimenting on human second, this was the time period have a nonarbitrary means of deter­ beings. The fact that a recommenda­ during which the investigation was mining where inspections should be tion to proceed was made in total con­ begun by my office. It was not clear made so that warrants could be grant- tradiction to the peer review is one of e This "bullet" symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by the Member on the floor. September 5, 1984 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 24323 the major concerns which I and others course of action that would assure prompt tal variance from the medical-removal re­ have expressed in this one example of abatement of hazards found in the course of quirements of OSHA's Lead Standard at the an inspection. A prime objective of this request of an employee who preferred not gross abuse of regulatory power. policy is to avoid lengthy legal actions to be removed from his job even though he Mr. Speaker, I won't take any more against OSHA that only delay correction of had blood-lead levels requiring such removal time with this pathetic little speech hazards and tie up the agency's resources in under OSHA's Lead Standard. A number of the Department has generated but to the courtroom instead of the workplace. firms in the lead industry have received var­ the credit of my colleagues, could not The evaluation being done by NIOSH at iances from these medical-removal require­ peddle. I would point out that while OSHA's request is intended to provide infor­ ments upon guarantees of increased medical we have cut back job training and mation to the agency on why some workers surveillance of workers and maintenance of CETA jobs considerably in the last experienced hearing loss. There are no sinis­ workplace controls. The Gulf Coast experi­ ter villains lurking in the wings to experi­ ment was designed to determine whether, in several years, there are clearly a few ment on hapless workers as the honorable make-work jobs left for the unskilled gentleman's remarks imply. In this particu­ conjunction with engineering controls, the at the Department of Labor. lar Coors facility, I understand that employ­ use of particular type of respirator designed Clnsert 11 ees are being fully protected during the expecially for the employee who wanted to NIOSH evaluation since the work establish­ remain at his job would result in lower Mr. Speaker: We all know that this is elec­ blood levels of lead. Strict medical evalua­ tion season, but a statement in the Congres­ ment is in compliance with OSHA's hearing conservation standard.
Recommended publications
  • Sheriff's Reports- Jefferson County SHERIFF's OFFICE JEFFERSON COUNTY GOLDEN, COLORAOO
    Sheriff's Reports- Jefferson County SHERIFF'S OFFICE JEFFERSON COUNTY GOLDEN, COLORAOO REFERENCE: ADOLPH COORS, III, VICTD-1 X:!DNAPING DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1960 FRCltt: 7£ . LEWIS HA\JLEY, UNDERSHERIFF I &rri ved at the scene South of Morrison t-1here Coors' car v1as being tov1ed &\·ray at approximately 4&00 P.M., this date. Upon arrh·inq at the scene, Lt. !Cechter and Captain Bray informed me of what the situation was. I looked at the ecene and saw '"here the blood spote were removed on the \!!est side of the hrid;re ;..rhere tho dirt samplos were taken and placed in a baq by Lab man, Dale Ryder. I also was sho-vm the hat and the cap and glasses that were found on the East side of the bridge. I then proceeded H-i th the Sheriff and Captain Bray to the Adolph Coors, III residence rlhereao Captain Bray and I interviel'sed Mrs. Coors in relation t o the timo that Ad Coors dep&r ted from the house that AM; wherein she replied to us he left t he house approxili!Iltely five minutes to eiqht, FebruarY 9, 1960. 11heroas Hrs. Mary Coors qave Captain Harold Bray and myself the tYPO of clothing that she remembered that Ad Coors \~as wearing on this morning; #1 - & kahki type baaeb&ll cap, a navy blue, quilted nylon, parka type coat, blue flannel pants and a pair of hiqh top shoes. We also asked if there \-Jere any guns missinq from the house. ~fuile at the house I ordered a tape recorder put on the telephone and traoo all incominq calls.
    [Show full text]
  • A TIMELINE for GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003)
    A TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003) "When a society or a civilization perishes, one condition can always be found. They forgot where they came from." Carl Sandburg This time-line was originally created by the Golden Historic Preservation Board for the 1995 Golden community meetings concerning growth. It is intended to illustrate some of the events and thoughts that helped shape Golden. Major historical events and common day-to-day happenings that influenced the lives of the people of Golden are included. Corrections, additions, and suggestions are welcome and may be relayed to either the Historic Preservation Board or the Planning Department at 384-8097. The information concerning events in Golden was gathered from a variety of sources. Among those used were: • The Colorado Transcript • The Golden Transcript • The Rocky Mountain News • The Denver Post State of Colorado Web pages, in particular the Colorado State Archives The League of Women Voters annual reports Golden, The 19th Century: A Colorado Chronicle. Lorraine Wagenbach and Jo Ann Thistlewood. Harbinger House, Littleton, 1987 The Shining Mountains. Georgina Brown. B & B Printers, Gunnison. 1976 The 1989 Survey of Historic Buildings in Downtown Golden. R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Survey of Golden Historic Buildings. by R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Golden Survey of Historic Buildings, 1991. R. Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons. Front Range Research Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City College of Technology City University of New York
    CITY TECH WRITER OUTSTANDING STUDENT WRITING FROM ALL DISCIPLINES VOLUME 1 2006 JANE MUSHABAC, EDITOR IN CHIEF Cover by Yifang Gonzalez New York City College of Technology City University of New York Introduction City Tech Writer is a most welcome addition to the College. The distinction between personal writing and academic writing is no longer as sharp or absolute as it once was; however, unlike a more traditional “literary” magazine that focuses on poetry and fiction, City Tech Writer is somewhat unusual in its focus on the writing—and the thinking—that students are doing as part of their course of study. Writing may be a solitary act or it may be collaborative, but all good writing is done with an audience in mind—the conscious reader who follows the line of thought, sometimes contesting its logic, sometimes nodding in agreement. City Tech Writer makes that audience real. In so doing, it both celebrates and stimulates good writing. My thanks to Professor Jane Mushabac, a writer who knows how to inspire and nurture new writers, to the faculty members who have guided their students’ work and nominated it for inclusion in City Tech Writer, and especially to the City Tech writers themselves. Bonne August Acting Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Preface In this inaugural issue, City Tech writers take us to the glass pavilion at the Brooklyn Museum, a village in Nigeria, a warehouse in Japan, a tractor and combine exhibition in Poland, a restaurant in Union Square, a crack-house in Bed-Stuy. The papers discuss campus speech codes; nurses’ renewal of licenses; the scientific method in the thirteenth and nineteenth centuries; and the problem of space, time, and motion.
    [Show full text]
  • Twixt Ocean and Pines : the Seaside Resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther
    University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 5-1996 Twixt ocean and pines : the seaside resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Souther, Jonathan Mark, "Twixt ocean and pines : the seaside resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930" (1996). Master's Theses. Paper 1037. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TWIXT OCEAN AND PINES: THE SEASIDE RESORT AT VIRGINIA BEACH, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther Master of Arts University of Richmond, 1996 Robert C. Kenzer, Thesis Director This thesis descnbes the first fifty years of the creation of Virginia Beach as a seaside resort. It demonstrates the importance of railroads in promoting the resort and suggests that Virginia Beach followed a similar developmental pattern to that of other ocean resorts, particularly those ofthe famous New Jersey shore. Virginia Beach, plagued by infrastructure deficiencies and overshadowed by nearby Ocean View, did not stabilize until its promoters shifted their attention from wealthy northerners to Tidewater area residents. After experiencing difficulties exacerbated by the Panic of 1893, the burning of its premier hotel in 1907, and the hesitation bred by the Spanish American War and World War I, Virginia Beach enjoyed robust growth during the 1920s. While Virginia Beach is often perceived as a post- World War II community, this thesis argues that its prewar foundation was critical to its subsequent rise to become the largest city in Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of the Craft Beer Boom in Virginia: How Breweries, Regulators, and the Public Can Collaborate to Mitigate Environmental Impacts
    William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 40 (2015-2016) Issue 1 Article 8 November 2015 Effects of the Craft Beer Boom in Virginia: How Breweries, Regulators, and the Public Can Collaborate to Mitigate Environmental Impacts Hannah Fish Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr Part of the Environmental Law Commons Repository Citation Hannah Fish, Effects of the Craft Beer Boom in Virginia: How Breweries, Regulators, and the Public Can Collaborate to Mitigate Environmental Impacts, 40 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 273 (2015), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol40/iss1/8 Copyright c 2015 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr EFFECTS OF THE CRAFT BEER BOOM IN VIRGINIA : HOW BREWERIES , REGULATORS , AND THE PUBLIC CAN COLLABORATE TO MITIGATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HANNAH FISH * INTRODUCTION The craft beer industry has the potential to be extremely energy- and resource-intensive, yet craft brewers have favored a more sustain- able approach. Renewed support from both state and local legislatures paired with brewers’ preference towards sustainable best practices, has placed Virginia in a position to become a leader in the growing sustain- able craft beer industry. Craft breweries in America are defined as “small, independent, and traditional”: a craft brewery operation generally produces six million barrels of beer or less annually, is not primarily owned or controlled by an alcoholic beverage industry member that is not itself a craft brewer, and combines traditional and non-traditional ingredients with innovative fermentation and brewing techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did Molson Coors — a Beer Company That Is One of Colorado’S Most Iconic Brands — Move Its Headquarters to Chicago?
    Why did Molson Coors — a beer company that is one of Colorado’s most iconic brands — move its headquarters to Chicago? Company says need for marketing talent weighed heavily in decision to leave Denver The Coors Brewery can be seen from Vanover Park on Oct. 30, 2019, in Golden. By Aldo Svaldi | [email protected] | The Denver Post ‐ November 3, 2019 Uprooting a company nearly 150 years deep in a community is never easy, and Molson Coors Brewing Co.’s decision to shift its corporate headquarters from Denver to Chicago involved a lot of deliberation. “The leadership team and board struggled over it and agonized. We looked at this every way you could imagine,” said Adam Collins, chief communications and corporate affairs officer for Molson Coors. But in the end, one consideration dominated more than any other — marketing. “Marketing was the true reason,” said Matthew Hargarten, another company spokesman. Not Denver’s ability to market itself, but rather Molson Coors’ ability to find and retain the marketing talent it needed to roll out a host of new products designed to appeal to shifting consumer preferences in a world of flattening beer sales. Molson Coors said Wednesday it would close its Denver corporate headquarters, eliminating or moving 300 jobs. The move, part of a larger reduction of up to 500 jobs, is expected to save the company $150 million a year. That money will be used to fund product innovation and boost digital marketing. But Colorado isn’t just losing high‐paying jobs. Part of the state’s corporate identity is being stripped away, and its biggest foothold in the consumer goods market has slipped away.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolph COORS Company and Its Unincorporated Affiliate, Coors
    ,•, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY .SEFORE THE ADMINISTRATOR. In the Matter of ) ) Adolph ·~~ors company ) Docket No. RCRA-VIII-90-09 '• and i't.s unincorporated ) aftil~ate, ) coors Brewing company, ) ··........ ) R~spondent ) ·~. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR AN ACCELERATED DECISION AND TO DISMISS The complaint in this proceeding under section 3008 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended (42 u.s. C. § 6928), commonly referred to as RCRA, issued on June 19, 1990, charged ·Respondent Coors with violations of the Act and applicable regulations. Specifically, Count I charged Coors with disposal of hazardous waste without a permit during the period october 1981 to .. August 1984, to-wit: spent solvents 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA) ..... ··; . .. : and Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) . designated as FOOl and F002, --·-· ... respectively, in the list of hazardous wastes appearing in 40 CFR ,· .. -~;i:-:.::."§ 261.31. The disposal allegedly occurred through leaks from sewer ,' ·~. ' _·-;:~ ;iines beneat~ Coors• container plant. count II charged Coors with .t· '- .f '·· · · <' :· · failure ·t.o . truthfully disclose information re~ired by 40 CFR § § 270.10(d) and 270.30(1~) and Count III charged Coors with failing to truthfully disclose information required by an EPA ncall-in" letter. Count IV charged Coors with failing to certify its 2 response to an EPA section 3007(a) information request as required by 40 CFR § 270.ll(d). In its answer and request for a hearing, dated July 24, 1990, Coors, among other things, denied that it allowed solvents identified in the complaint to leak from sewer lines at its container plant and alleged that upon discovery of an unanticipated sewer line failure it took steps to prevent leakage from the sewer line and to mitigate the effects of such leakage.
    [Show full text]
  • Molson Coors Brewing Co
    MOLSON COORS BREWING CO FORM 10-K (Annual Report) Filed 3/28/1994 For Period Ending 12/26/1993 Address P.O. BOX 4030, MAIL #NH375 GOLDEN, Colorado 80401 Telephone 303-277-3271 CIK 0000024545 Industry Beverages (Alcoholic) Sector Consumer/Non-Cyclical Fiscal Year 12/28 U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (FEE REQUIRED) For the fiscal year ended December 26, 1993 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 (NO FEE REQUIRED) For the transition period from to Commission file number 0-8251 ADOLPH COORS COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Colorado 84-0178360 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) incorporation or organization) Golden, Colorado 80401 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code (303) 279-6565 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered None None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Class B Common Stock (non-voting), no par value (Title of class) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Adolph Coors in the Brewing Industry Pdf Reader
    Adolph Coors In The Brewing Industry Pdf Reader 1 / 4 2 / 4 Adolph Coors In The Brewing Industry Pdf Reader 3 / 4 The Adolph Coors in the Brewing Industry case study is a Harvard Business ... the problem may be clearly evident in the reading of the HBR case. ... Coors in the Brewing Industry BCG matrix and included in the case pdf.. Editorial Reviews. Review. “A compassionate appraisal of the tragedy that shattered the family ... Death of an Heir: Adolph Coors III and the Murder That Rocked an American Brewing Dynasty. ... $14.99 Read with Our Free App; Hardcover ... from the music, television, and sports industries, and other noteworthy clients.. When you place your first order on HBR.org and enter your credit card information and shipping address, "Speed-Pay" ordering is enabled. "Speed-Pay" is a .... And if you're interested in reading Philip Jett's book The Death of an Heir: Adolph Coors III and the Murder That Rocked an American Brewing .... The brewing industry in the US consists of ales, stouts and bitters, low alcohol ... Since World War II, due to increase price of cans, major industries decided to produce their own cans. ... Adolph Coors, Sr., started Coors brewing company back in 1873 in Golden, Colorado. ... Female student reading and using laptop to study .... PDF | Formed by the merger of Molson Inc. and the Adolph Coors ... small breweries in the U.S., and on average, each produces 5,600 bar-.. Small breweries were operating in major cities well before the ... The final major shift in the industry at this time was the emergence of Adolph Coors Brewing as a major ..
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Coors Beer and AFL-CIO Slug It out in the Media
    Morris Page 1 Case Study: Coors Beer and AFL-CIO Slug it Out in the Media By Beverly Morris Introduction Innovations in communication and media technology have widened news and editorial coverage of corporate issues, and cultivated growing public interest and activism in corporate affairs. Businesses that once felt protected by privacy, now embrace the enabling capability of media relations. They also know that poorly executed media relations of their own, or well executed media relations on the part of adversaries, can have serious negative consequences. This case study examines how media relations, when handled skillfully, can assist a corporation with managing its financial vulnerability to adversarial attempts to manipulate its business practices through widespread communication techniques. Case Objective The case objective here is to present for analysis a Coors’s 1982 media relations problem and describe how the company’s solution strategy to address the problem demonstrates effective use of the media relations principles outlined in Chapter Six of Paul Argenti’s Corporate Communication (128-136). Executive Summary The Adolph Coors Company has a long and consistent history of contentious relations with labor unions. Highly publicized labor related boycotts and strikes against Coors have affected negatively the sales of Coors products and its reputation among consumers. The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO) ran a consistent campaign of negative publicity against the brewery during a ten-year consumer boycott of Coors products. Coors said the boycott was based on information that was not true. Through the efforts of its corporate communication department and a major marketing communications consultant, the company was already acting to improve its image and reputation when an acute threat that could undermine its public relations efforts emerged.
    [Show full text]
  • Molson Coors Brewing Co
    MOLSON COORS BREWING CO FORM 8-K (Unscheduled Material Events) Filed 6/2/2000 For Period Ending 5/11/2000 Address P.O. BOX 4030, MAIL #NH375 GOLDEN, Colorado 80401 Telephone 303-277-3271 CIK 0000024545 Industry Beverages (Alcoholic) Sector Consumer/Non-Cyclical Fiscal Year 12/28 U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): May 11, 2000 ADOLPH COORS COMPANY (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) COLORADO 0-8251 84-0178360 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission File No.) (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) Golden, Colorado 80401 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) 303-279-6565 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Not applicable (Former name or address, if changed since last report) PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 5. Other Events On May 11, 2000, Adolph Coors Company (ACC) issued a news release announcing changes to certain Board of Directors and top management positions at ACC and the Company's principal subsidiary, Coors Brewing Company (CBC). ACC's May 11, 2000 news release is attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits (c) Exhibits 1. News Release of Adolph Coors Company dated May 11, 2000. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. ADOLPH COORS COMPANY By /s/ M.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinkholes Cause Problems at Proposed Brewery Site J
    e^Btbeze SGA Election Special inside Vol. 57 James Madison University Harrisonburg, Virginia Friday, March 28,1*80 No. He had an idea.. Cambodia Week will be a reality , but not the way Paul Lingon imagined it By KEVIN MILLER Paul Lingon had an idea. Sparked by the Cambodian benefit concert held on campus in January, Lingon, along with a group of friends, envisioned a "Cambodia Week," filled with benefit concerts, student rallies and guest lectures by such notables as Rosalyn Carter. The idea was not just an idle dream. Lingon had planned an events schedule and talked to numerous organizations in Harrisonburg. He spoke to the first lady's personal secretary and was reasonably certain that because Mrs. Carter was active in the campaign against starvation in Cambodia, she would come here if the Cambodia Week activities were organized. Lingon also spoke to the vice president of NBC News; Peter Deno, who agreed to cover the week's events if they materialized. The Student Government Association agreed to collect and direct any funds received from the benefit. He Photo by Charles A. Fazio arranged press coverage from the Dally News-Record, The Breeze, The Line and WMRA radio and suggested CROWDED bike racks on campus may be an students are concerned about rising gas that all money collected from parking tickets during indication of warmer weather or perhaps prices. Cambodia Week be contributed to the benefit collection. It all would be official as soon as Lingon "got the OK" from University President Ronald Carrier. Lingon met in February with Carrier who rejected the possibility of deferring parking ticket funds to the Sinkholes cause problems benefit and would not offer any matching funds to help Lingon make the week materialize, he said.
    [Show full text]