Historically Jeffco Magazine 1999
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Sheriff's Reports- Jefferson County SHERIFF's OFFICE JEFFERSON COUNTY GOLDEN, COLORAOO
Sheriff's Reports- Jefferson County SHERIFF'S OFFICE JEFFERSON COUNTY GOLDEN, COLORAOO REFERENCE: ADOLPH COORS, III, VICTD-1 X:!DNAPING DATE: FEBRUARY 9, 1960 FRCltt: 7£ . LEWIS HA\JLEY, UNDERSHERIFF I &rri ved at the scene South of Morrison t-1here Coors' car v1as being tov1ed &\·ray at approximately 4&00 P.M., this date. Upon arrh·inq at the scene, Lt. !Cechter and Captain Bray informed me of what the situation was. I looked at the ecene and saw '"here the blood spote were removed on the \!!est side of the hrid;re ;..rhere tho dirt samplos were taken and placed in a baq by Lab man, Dale Ryder. I also was sho-vm the hat and the cap and glasses that were found on the East side of the bridge. I then proceeded H-i th the Sheriff and Captain Bray to the Adolph Coors, III residence rlhereao Captain Bray and I interviel'sed Mrs. Coors in relation t o the timo that Ad Coors dep&r ted from the house that AM; wherein she replied to us he left t he house approxili!Iltely five minutes to eiqht, FebruarY 9, 1960. 11heroas Hrs. Mary Coors qave Captain Harold Bray and myself the tYPO of clothing that she remembered that Ad Coors \~as wearing on this morning; #1 - & kahki type baaeb&ll cap, a navy blue, quilted nylon, parka type coat, blue flannel pants and a pair of hiqh top shoes. We also asked if there \-Jere any guns missinq from the house. ~fuile at the house I ordered a tape recorder put on the telephone and traoo all incominq calls. -
A TIMELINE for GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003)
A TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003) "When a society or a civilization perishes, one condition can always be found. They forgot where they came from." Carl Sandburg This time-line was originally created by the Golden Historic Preservation Board for the 1995 Golden community meetings concerning growth. It is intended to illustrate some of the events and thoughts that helped shape Golden. Major historical events and common day-to-day happenings that influenced the lives of the people of Golden are included. Corrections, additions, and suggestions are welcome and may be relayed to either the Historic Preservation Board or the Planning Department at 384-8097. The information concerning events in Golden was gathered from a variety of sources. Among those used were: • The Colorado Transcript • The Golden Transcript • The Rocky Mountain News • The Denver Post State of Colorado Web pages, in particular the Colorado State Archives The League of Women Voters annual reports Golden, The 19th Century: A Colorado Chronicle. Lorraine Wagenbach and Jo Ann Thistlewood. Harbinger House, Littleton, 1987 The Shining Mountains. Georgina Brown. B & B Printers, Gunnison. 1976 The 1989 Survey of Historic Buildings in Downtown Golden. R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Survey of Golden Historic Buildings. by R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Golden Survey of Historic Buildings, 1991. R. Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons. Front Range Research Associates, Inc. -
New York City College of Technology City University of New York
CITY TECH WRITER OUTSTANDING STUDENT WRITING FROM ALL DISCIPLINES VOLUME 1 2006 JANE MUSHABAC, EDITOR IN CHIEF Cover by Yifang Gonzalez New York City College of Technology City University of New York Introduction City Tech Writer is a most welcome addition to the College. The distinction between personal writing and academic writing is no longer as sharp or absolute as it once was; however, unlike a more traditional “literary” magazine that focuses on poetry and fiction, City Tech Writer is somewhat unusual in its focus on the writing—and the thinking—that students are doing as part of their course of study. Writing may be a solitary act or it may be collaborative, but all good writing is done with an audience in mind—the conscious reader who follows the line of thought, sometimes contesting its logic, sometimes nodding in agreement. City Tech Writer makes that audience real. In so doing, it both celebrates and stimulates good writing. My thanks to Professor Jane Mushabac, a writer who knows how to inspire and nurture new writers, to the faculty members who have guided their students’ work and nominated it for inclusion in City Tech Writer, and especially to the City Tech writers themselves. Bonne August Acting Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Preface In this inaugural issue, City Tech writers take us to the glass pavilion at the Brooklyn Museum, a village in Nigeria, a warehouse in Japan, a tractor and combine exhibition in Poland, a restaurant in Union Square, a crack-house in Bed-Stuy. The papers discuss campus speech codes; nurses’ renewal of licenses; the scientific method in the thirteenth and nineteenth centuries; and the problem of space, time, and motion. -
Twixt Ocean and Pines : the Seaside Resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther
University of Richmond UR Scholarship Repository Master's Theses Student Research 5-1996 Twixt ocean and pines : the seaside resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.richmond.edu/masters-theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Souther, Jonathan Mark, "Twixt ocean and pines : the seaside resort at Virginia Beach, 1880-1930" (1996). Master's Theses. Paper 1037. This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Research at UR Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UR Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TWIXT OCEAN AND PINES: THE SEASIDE RESORT AT VIRGINIA BEACH, 1880-1930 Jonathan Mark Souther Master of Arts University of Richmond, 1996 Robert C. Kenzer, Thesis Director This thesis descnbes the first fifty years of the creation of Virginia Beach as a seaside resort. It demonstrates the importance of railroads in promoting the resort and suggests that Virginia Beach followed a similar developmental pattern to that of other ocean resorts, particularly those ofthe famous New Jersey shore. Virginia Beach, plagued by infrastructure deficiencies and overshadowed by nearby Ocean View, did not stabilize until its promoters shifted their attention from wealthy northerners to Tidewater area residents. After experiencing difficulties exacerbated by the Panic of 1893, the burning of its premier hotel in 1907, and the hesitation bred by the Spanish American War and World War I, Virginia Beach enjoyed robust growth during the 1920s. While Virginia Beach is often perceived as a post- World War II community, this thesis argues that its prewar foundation was critical to its subsequent rise to become the largest city in Virginia. -
Chapter 4 the Denver Mountain Parks System 56
Chapter 4 The Denver Mountain Parks System 56 The Denver Mountain Parks System The Denver Mountain Parks The System 57 Chapter 4 The Denver Mountain Parks System 4.A. Systemwide Recommendations Recreation Recommendations Background Today, those who visit the Denver Mountain Parks (DMP) represent a broad cross section of people in demographics, where they reside, and how far they travel to enjoy these mountain lands. Visitors to the Mountain Parks are cosmopolitan – a true mix of cultures and languages. With the exception of African-Americans being under- represented, the Mountain Parks reflect the same diversity of age and ethnicity as occurs at Denver’s urban parks. Although visitors to the Mountain Parks represent the spectrum, many come from low to middle income households. Typically one third of those who visit either a Denver Mountain Park or another county open space park are Denver residents. Another third reside in the county in which the park is located. The last third are visitors from other counties along the Front Range, visitors from other parts of the state and nation, and international visitors. Together, mountain open space lands owned by Denver, Jefferson County, Douglas County, and Clear Creek County are used recipro- cally. Together, they are a regional Front Range open space sys- tem where each county provides its own lands and facilities for the enjoyment of its own residents, recognizing that these lands are also enjoyed by all visitors. The goal for Denver Mountain Parks is to provide the amenities and programs that take advantage of but do not diminish the valu- Red Rocks Park able natural and cultural resources and that meet today’s recre- ation needs and desire to connect kids with nature. -
Effects of the Craft Beer Boom in Virginia: How Breweries, Regulators, and the Public Can Collaborate to Mitigate Environmental Impacts
William & Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review Volume 40 (2015-2016) Issue 1 Article 8 November 2015 Effects of the Craft Beer Boom in Virginia: How Breweries, Regulators, and the Public Can Collaborate to Mitigate Environmental Impacts Hannah Fish Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr Part of the Environmental Law Commons Repository Citation Hannah Fish, Effects of the Craft Beer Boom in Virginia: How Breweries, Regulators, and the Public Can Collaborate to Mitigate Environmental Impacts, 40 Wm. & Mary Envtl. L. & Pol'y Rev. 273 (2015), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr/vol40/iss1/8 Copyright c 2015 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmelpr EFFECTS OF THE CRAFT BEER BOOM IN VIRGINIA : HOW BREWERIES , REGULATORS , AND THE PUBLIC CAN COLLABORATE TO MITIGATE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HANNAH FISH * INTRODUCTION The craft beer industry has the potential to be extremely energy- and resource-intensive, yet craft brewers have favored a more sustain- able approach. Renewed support from both state and local legislatures paired with brewers’ preference towards sustainable best practices, has placed Virginia in a position to become a leader in the growing sustain- able craft beer industry. Craft breweries in America are defined as “small, independent, and traditional”: a craft brewery operation generally produces six million barrels of beer or less annually, is not primarily owned or controlled by an alcoholic beverage industry member that is not itself a craft brewer, and combines traditional and non-traditional ingredients with innovative fermentation and brewing techniques. -
Municipal Parks Parkways
MMuunniicciippaall PPaarrkkss aanndd PPaarrkkwwaayyss IN THE CCOOLLOORRAADDOO SSTTAATTEE RREEGGIISSTTEERR OF HHIISSTTOORRIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Colorado Historical Society DIRECTORY OF MMuunniicciippaall PPaarrkkss aanndd PPaarrkkwwaayyss IN THE CCOOLLOORRAADDOO SSTTAATTEE RREEGGIISSTTEERR OOFF HHIISSTTOORRIICC PPRROOPPEERRTTIIEESS Includes Colorado properties listed in the National Register of Historic Places and the State Register of Historic Properties Updated Through December 2006 Prepared By Lisa Werdel © 2006 Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Colorado Historical Society 1300 Broadway Denver, Colorado 80203-2137 www.coloradohistory-oahp.org The Colorado State Register of Historic Properties is a program of the Colorado Historical Society. Founded in 1879, the Colorado Historical Society brings the unique character of Colorado's past to more than a million people each year through historical museums and highway markers, exhibitions, manuscript and photograph collections, popular and scholarly publications, historical and archaeological preservation services, and educational programs for children and adults. The Society collects, preserves, and interprets the history of Colorado for present and future generations. A nonprofit agency with its own membership, the Society is also a state institution located within Colorado's Department of Higher Education The Colorado Historical Society operates twelve historic sites and museums at ten locations around the state, including -
Why Did Molson Coors — a Beer Company That Is One of Colorado’S Most Iconic Brands — Move Its Headquarters to Chicago?
Why did Molson Coors — a beer company that is one of Colorado’s most iconic brands — move its headquarters to Chicago? Company says need for marketing talent weighed heavily in decision to leave Denver The Coors Brewery can be seen from Vanover Park on Oct. 30, 2019, in Golden. By Aldo Svaldi | [email protected] | The Denver Post ‐ November 3, 2019 Uprooting a company nearly 150 years deep in a community is never easy, and Molson Coors Brewing Co.’s decision to shift its corporate headquarters from Denver to Chicago involved a lot of deliberation. “The leadership team and board struggled over it and agonized. We looked at this every way you could imagine,” said Adam Collins, chief communications and corporate affairs officer for Molson Coors. But in the end, one consideration dominated more than any other — marketing. “Marketing was the true reason,” said Matthew Hargarten, another company spokesman. Not Denver’s ability to market itself, but rather Molson Coors’ ability to find and retain the marketing talent it needed to roll out a host of new products designed to appeal to shifting consumer preferences in a world of flattening beer sales. Molson Coors said Wednesday it would close its Denver corporate headquarters, eliminating or moving 300 jobs. The move, part of a larger reduction of up to 500 jobs, is expected to save the company $150 million a year. That money will be used to fund product innovation and boost digital marketing. But Colorado isn’t just losing high‐paying jobs. Part of the state’s corporate identity is being stripped away, and its biggest foothold in the consumer goods market has slipped away. -
Adolph COORS Company and Its Unincorporated Affiliate, Coors
,•, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY .SEFORE THE ADMINISTRATOR. In the Matter of ) ) Adolph ·~~ors company ) Docket No. RCRA-VIII-90-09 '• and i't.s unincorporated ) aftil~ate, ) coors Brewing company, ) ··........ ) R~spondent ) ·~. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR AN ACCELERATED DECISION AND TO DISMISS The complaint in this proceeding under section 3008 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended (42 u.s. C. § 6928), commonly referred to as RCRA, issued on June 19, 1990, charged ·Respondent Coors with violations of the Act and applicable regulations. Specifically, Count I charged Coors with disposal of hazardous waste without a permit during the period october 1981 to .. August 1984, to-wit: spent solvents 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA) ..... ··; . .. : and Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) . designated as FOOl and F002, --·-· ... respectively, in the list of hazardous wastes appearing in 40 CFR ,· .. -~;i:-:.::."§ 261.31. The disposal allegedly occurred through leaks from sewer ,' ·~. ' _·-;:~ ;iines beneat~ Coors• container plant. count II charged Coors with .t· '- .f '·· · · <' :· · failure ·t.o . truthfully disclose information re~ired by 40 CFR § § 270.10(d) and 270.30(1~) and Count III charged Coors with failing to truthfully disclose information required by an EPA ncall-in" letter. Count IV charged Coors with failing to certify its 2 response to an EPA section 3007(a) information request as required by 40 CFR § 270.ll(d). In its answer and request for a hearing, dated July 24, 1990, Coors, among other things, denied that it allowed solvents identified in the complaint to leak from sewer lines at its container plant and alleged that upon discovery of an unanticipated sewer line failure it took steps to prevent leakage from the sewer line and to mitigate the effects of such leakage. -
National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
NPS Form 10-900-b OMB No. 1024-0018 (Revised March 1992) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. X New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing The Architecture of Jules Jacques Benois Benedict in Colorado B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) The Architecture of Jules Jacques Benois Benedict in Colorado, 1909-1942 C. Form Prepared by name/title R.Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons, Historians (17 March 2005) organization Front Range Research Associates, Inc., for Historic Denver, Inc. street & number 3635 W. 46th Ave. telephone 303-477-7597 city or town Denver state Colorado zip code 80211 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission -
M a S T E R P L
MASTER PLAN 2008 2 Acknowledgments Mayor John W. Hickenlooper Kevin Patterson, Manager of Denver Parks and Recreation Bart Berger, President of the Denver Mountain Parks Foundation Gary Walter, Douglas County Public Works Primary authors: Bert Weaver, Clear Creek County Susan Baird, Tina Bishop Denver City Council Members: Dave Webster, President, Inter-Neighborhood Cooperation Carol Boigan Tom Wooten, Ross Consulting Charlie Brown Melanie Worley, Douglas County Commissioner Editors: Jeanne Faatz Dick Wulf, Director, Evergreen Park & Recreation District Sally White, Susan Baird Rick Garcia Frank Young, Clear Creek Open Space Michael Hancock Marcia Johnson Contributing authors and editors: Peggy Lehmann Roundtable Experts: Bart Berger, Jude O’Connor, A.J. Tripp-Addison Doug Linkhart Anne Baker-Easley, Volunteers for Outdoor Colorado Paul D. López Deanne Buck, Access Fund Thanks to: Curt Carlson, Colorado Parks & Recreation Association Carla Madison Barnhart Communications, Denver Mountain Parks Judy Montero Erik Dyce, Theatres and Arenas Foundation, and The Parks People. Chris Nevitt Colleen Gadd, Jefferson County Open Space Jeanne Robb Mark Guebert-Stewart, Recreational Equipment, Inc. Karen Hardesty, Colorado Division of Wildlife Photos: Fabby Hillyard, LODO District Historic photos courtesy of the Denver Public Library Western History Master Plan Advisory Group: Diane Hitchings, USDA Forest Service Collection (DPL-WHC), Barbara Teyssier Forrest Collection, and Denver Mountain Parks file photos. Co-chair Peggy Lehmann, Denver City Councilwoman Gerhard Holtzendorf, Recreational Equipment, Inc. Co-chair Landri Taylor Tim Hutchens, Denver Parks & Recreation, Outdoor Rec Other photos contributed by Susan Baird, Bart Berger, Tina Bishop, Cheryl Armstrong, CEO, Beckwourth Mt. Club Michelle Madrid-Montoya, Denver Parks & Recreation Michael Encinias, Micah Klaver, Bill Mangel, Jessica Miller, Pat Mundus, Tad Bowman, Theatres and Arenas Bryan Martin, Colorado Mountain Club Jude O’Connor, Glen Richardson, Ken Sherbenou, Mike Strunk, A.J. -
Chapter 2 Context & Change
Chapter 2 Context & Change 22 Red Rocks Park The Denver Mountain Parks Context and Change 23 Chapter 2 Context and Change 2.A. History of the Denver Mountain Parks The “City Beautiful” pavilions and malls of the World’s Columbian Exposition of 1893 held in Chicago influenced how cities would be built across the country for decades and caught the imagination of Robert Speer, who became Denver’s Mayor in 1904. Mayor Speer immediately put vision into action, including the bold idea to extend Denver’s parkways (via Alameda Parkway and Colfax Avenue) right up into the mountains so that Den- ver residents and tourists alike could experience the beauty and recreation found in the foothills. Denver may have been built on the high plains, but Mayor Speer, John Lookout Mountain Park Shelter Brisben Walker, and other civic lead- ers saw it as both the “Paris on the Platte” and the “Switzerland of the Rockies.” The Denver Real Estate Exchange, Chamber of Com- merce, and Motor Club all formed the Mountain Parks Committee. Their report began “A Mountain Park for Denver will be the first step, and perhaps, the greatest step, in the great movement of making our mountains available for the people.” Genesee Park By 1912, this body, acting on Denver’s behalf, Echo Lake Park had hired the Olmsted Brothers Landscape Architects of Brookline, MA, to develop a plan. Olmsted Jr., and his assistant, surveyed the mountains by horseback. The 1914 Plan by Olmsted is a thorough “A Mountain Park for Denver will be the first step, and, perhaps, the but unassuming collection of letters and reports with lists of parcels greatest step, in the great movement of making our mountains avail- to purchase and pages of sensible political and funding advice.