DOCSLIB.ORG

Guide to Direct Marketing Livestock and Poultry Regulations Every Producer Should Know to Legally Sell Meat and Livestock in New York State

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guide to Direct Marketing Livestock and Poultry Regulations Every Producer Should Know to Legally Sell Meat and Livestock in New York State Guide to Direct Marketing Livestock and Poultry Regulations Every Producer Should Know to Legally Sell Meat and Livestock in New York State 2019 revisions were made by the Food and Beverage Law Clinic, a part of John Jay Legal Services, Inc., a non-profit legal services organization housed at the Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University. Research was performed, and revisions were made, by Clinic students Maria Baratta, Nick Sioufas, and Brian Winfield, and by Pace-NRDC Food Law Fellow Daniel Sugar, with guidance from Professor Jonathan Brown. We are very grateful to the law students who helped with this process, and to the following people who reviewed the latest version: Kathleen Harris, farmer, former head of NE Animal Livestock Processing Service Co / farmer Dr. tatiana Stanton, Cornell Animal Science / farmer Rebecca Thistlethwaite, Niche Meat Processors Association Cory Skier, NYS Dept of Ag and Markets Division of Food Safety and Inspection Peter Duryea, USDA Policy Development Staff Erica Frenay, Cornell Small Farms Program / farmer The Work Team and the December 2010 revisions were funded by the Cornell Small Farm Program. January 2010 revisions were funded in part by the Niche Meat Processors Assistance Network and the New York State Grazing Lands Conservation Initiative. The initial paper was funded in part by a Food and Industry Development Grant received from the New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets and through the contributions of NY Farms!, Cornell University Department of Animal Science and Fallow Hollow Deer Farm. Many thanks are due Clarence Davis, former Supervising Food Inspector, New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets Division of Food Safety and Inspection for meeting with us while he was still employed by NYSDAM on numerous occasions and answering our hundreds of questions. Members of New York Small Farm Work Team on Livestock Processing Issues 2010-2011 • Dr. tatiana Luisa Stanton, Cornell Animal • Tom Gallagher, CCE Albany County Science / farmer (TEAM CO-LEADER) • Michael Glos, King Bird Farm (farmer/ • Martha Goodsell, Fallow Hollow Deer processor) Farm (TEAM CO-LEADER) • Dr. James Hayes, Sapbush Hollow Farm • Debra Ball, Eagle Bridge Custom Meats (farmer/ processor) (processor) • Kathleen Harris, Northeast Livestock • Laura Biasillo, CCE Broome County Processing Service Company • Lynn Bliven, CCE Allegany County / • Betsy Hodge, CCE St. Lawrence County Wild Geese Farm • Matthew LeRoux, CCE Tompkins County • Marty Broccoli, CCE Oneida County • Audrey Reith, CCE Orange County • Eric Shelley, SUNY Cobleskill Meats Lab • Chris Harmon, CADE / Cowboy Custom Cutting (processor) • Jim McLaughlin, Cornerstone Farm • Heather Sandford, The Piggery (farmer/ Ventures processor) • Shannon Nichols, Heamour Farm (farmer) • Lindsay Wickham, NY Farm Bureau • Kirby Selkirk, Kirbside Gardens (farmer) 2 Resource Guide to Direct Marketing Livestock and Poultry TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents I. Introduction to Meat Regulation ....................................................................................... 10 A. Why We Decided to Undertake This Project ............................................................................ 10 B. Why Inspections Are Important and the History of Federal Inspection ................................ 10 C. Compliance Versus Circumventing ............................................................................................ 11 II. How Regulations Are Classified ........................................................................................ 12 A. Are the Animals or Birds Amenable or Non-Amenable? ......................................................... 13 B. Why Identifying a Market Channel Is Important .................................................................... 15 C. What Is Commerce? .................................................................................................................... 16 D. Intrastate or Interstate? .............................................................................................................. 16 E. Import or Export?........................................................................................................................ 17 F. Religious Exemptions, Certifications, and Cultural Practices ................................................. 20 1. Halal Requirements .................................................................................................................................. 20 2. Kosher Requirements ............................................................................................................................... 21 3. Federal Law Concerning Religious Slaughter .......................................................................................... 21 4. Humane Handling During Religious Slaughter ........................................................................................ 21 5. Halal and Kosher Labeling ....................................................................................................................... 22 a) New York’s Kosher Law Protection Act of 2004 ................................................................................ 22 b) New York’s Halal Foods Protection Act of 2005 ................................................................................ 23 6. Other Cultural Practices ............................................................................................................................ 24 G. Federal, State, or Custom: What Is the Difference? ................................................................. 24 1. USDA-Inspected Meat Processing Facilities ............................................................................................ 25 2. State or Locally Inspected “Custom Exempt” Slaughterhouses ............................................................... 26 3. DUAL LICENSES for Custom Exempt and 5-A Slaughtering ................................................................ 27 4. 5-A Non-Amenable Slaughtering and Processing Facilities ..................................................................... 28 a) Licensing ............................................................................................................................................. 28 b) Unlawful Acts ...................................................................................................................................... 29 5. 5-A Poultry Slaughtering and Processing Facilities ................................................................................. 30 a) 5-A Facility Design .............................................................................................................................. 30 b) 5-A Facility Location ........................................................................................................................... 30 6. 20-C Meat Processing Facilities ............................................................................................................... 31 a) Meat Lockers ....................................................................................................................................... 32 7. Retail-Exempt ........................................................................................................................................... 33 H. Other Types of Slaughterhouses Not Available in New York .................................................. 34 1. Talmadge-Aiken Meat Plants ................................................................................................................... 34 2. State-Licensed USDA-Equivalent Slaughterhouses ................................................................................. 34 III. Who Are the Responsible Parties of the Tiered System? ............................................ 38 A. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)....................................................................................... 38 1. Food Safety Modernization Act................................................................................................................ 39 B. USDA Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) .................................................................... 40 C. Other Federal Agencies ............................................................................................................... 41 D. Other State and County Agencies .............................................................................................. 41 3 IV. Handling Slaughter Animals .......................................................................................... 43 A. Humane Handling ........................................................................................................................ 43 1. Systematic Approach ................................................................................................................................ 46 B. Humane Transport ...................................................................................................................... 48 C. Movement of Non-Ambulatory Animals to Slaughter .............................................................. 49 D. How Many Animals Can Be Loaded on a Trailer? ................................................................... 50 E. Acting as a Livestock Hauler ...................................................................................................... 51 1. USDOT Number Requirements ...............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Red Meat Regulations
    Extract from Government Gazette No. 26779, 2004 09 17, Regulation Gazette No. 8056 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE No. 1072 17 September 2004 MEAT SAFETY ACT, 2000 (ACT No. 40 OF 2000) RED MEAT REGULATIONS The Minister of Agriculture has, in terms of section 22 of the Meat Safety Act, 2000 (Act No. 40 of 2000), made the regulations set out in the Schedule. SCHEDULE ARRANGEMENT OF CONTENTS OF RED MEAT REGULATIONS PART Subject Section Regulation Page I General: Definitions 1 2 Applications for registration [8(1)(a)] 2 3 Serving of instruction [10(2)(b)] 3 3 II Requirements for registration of red meat abattoirs [11(1)(a)] A. Throughput and other requirements for grades 4 – 7 4 B. Structural requirements (1) for all abattoirs 8 – 18 10 (2) for low and high throughput 19 – 29 14 C. Hygiene management practices and related matters: (1) Offal handling 30 – 32 17 (2) Cutting and processing 33 – 38 18 (3) Chilling and freezing 39 – 44 20 (4) Loading meat products for transport 45 21 (5) Sanitation 46 – 48 22 III Hygiene management and evaluation systems [11(1)(e)] 49 – 55 23 IV Hygiene requirements for persons entering abattoirs [11(1)(f)] 56 – 63 29 V Humane treatment of animals and slaughter process [11(1)(h)] 64 – 78 30 VI Meat inspections [11(1)] 79 – 111 35 VII Marks and marking [11(1)(m)] 112 – 117 45 VIII Treatment of condemned material, etc. [11(1)(r)] 118 – 124 47 IX Export-regulations [22(1)(h)] 125 49 X Import-regulations [22(1)(h)] 126 50 XI Exemptions (all species): [22(1)(c)] Own use 127 51 Religious purposes 128 – 129 51 Religious slaughter in abattoirs 130 52 XII Final provisions: Appeals [18(2)] 131 52 Short title 132 52 Table 1 53 Extract from Government Gazette No.
    [Show full text]
  • Meat and Muscle Biology™ Introduction
    Published June 7, 2018 Meat and Muscle Biology™ Meat Science Lexicon* Dennis L. Seman1, Dustin D. Boler2, C. Chad Carr3, Michael E. Dikeman4, Casey M. Owens5, Jimmy T. Keeton6, T. Dean Pringle7, Jeffrey J. Sindelar1, Dale R. Woerner8, Amilton S. de Mello9 and Thomas H. Powell10 1University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706, USA 2University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA 3University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 4Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA 5University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, USA 6Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA 7University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA 8Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA 9University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557, USA 10American Meat Science Association, Champaign, IL 61820, USA *Inquiries should be sent to: [email protected] Abstract: The American Meat Science Association (AMSA) became aware of the need to develop a Meat Science Lexi- con for the standardization of various terms used in meat sciences that have been adopted by researchers in allied fields, culinary arts, journalists, health professionals, nutritionists, regulatory authorities, and consumers. Two primary catego- ries of terms were considered. The first regarding definitions of meat including related terms, e.g., “red” and “white” meat. The second regarding terms describing the processing of meat. In general, meat is defined as skeletal muscle and associated tissues derived from mammals as well as avian and aquatic species. The associated terms, especially “red” and “white” meat have been a continual source of confusion to classify meats for dietary recommendations, communicate nutrition policy, and provide medical advice, but were originally not intended for those purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sexual Politics of Meat by Carol J. Adams
    THE SEXUAL POLITICS OF MEAT A FEMINISTVEGETARIAN CRITICAL THEORY Praise for The Sexual Politics of Meat and Carol J. Adams “A clearheaded scholar joins the ideas of two movements—vegetari- anism and feminism—and turns them into a single coherent and moral theory. Her argument is rational and persuasive. New ground—whole acres of it—is broken by Adams.” —Colman McCarthy, Washington Post Book World “Th e Sexual Politics of Meat examines the historical, gender, race, and class implications of meat culture, and makes the links between the prac tice of butchering/eating animals and the maintenance of male domi nance. Read this powerful new book and you may well become a vegetarian.” —Ms. “Adams’s work will almost surely become a ‘bible’ for feminist and pro gressive animal rights activists. Depiction of animal exploita- tion as one manifestation of a brutal patriarchal culture has been explored in two [of her] books, Th e Sexual Politics of Meat and Neither Man nor Beast: Feminism and the Defense of Animals. Adams argues that factory farming is part of a whole culture of oppression and insti- tutionalized violence. Th e treatment of animals as objects is parallel to and associated with patriarchal society’s objectifi cation of women, blacks, and other minorities in order to routinely exploit them. Adams excels in constructing unexpected juxtapositions by using the language of one kind of relationship to illuminate another. Employing poetic rather than rhetorical techniques, Adams makes powerful connec- tions that encourage readers to draw their own conclusions.” —Choice “A dynamic contribution toward creating a feminist/animal rights theory.” —Animals’ Agenda “A cohesive, passionate case linking meat-eating to the oppression of animals and women .
    [Show full text]
  • Meat Inspectors Manual Red Meat
    MEAT INSPECTORS MANUAL RED MEAT DIRECTORATE: VETERINARY SERVICES VETERINARY PUBLIC HEALTH NATIONAL DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA JANUARY 2007 FOREWORD The delivery of meat hygiene services in South Africa has gone through various phases of change since the function was officially made the responsibility of the Department of Agriculture in the early 1960’s. Little did we realise when the first Animal Slaughter, Meat and Animal Products Act, 1967 (Act No. 87 of 1967) was published in 1967, what challenges would lie ahead 40 years later. We have seen the third Act related to the delivery of meat hygiene services promulgated by Parliament. The Meat Safety Act 2000 (Act 40 of 2000), has replaced the Abattoir Hygiene Act (Act 121 of 1992) signifying, not only by the change in names of the relevant Acts since 1967 but also in the objectives of the Act, the obligation of Government to react to the needs of its clientele and to address the concerns of consumers. The emphasis on the delivery of services as reflected in consecutive legislation since 1967, has changed gradually from a structural and process-control approach of service delivery, to a holistic approach with the focus on food safety. Growing international concern that the State should be the custodian on all matters related to food safety and provides the sanitary guarantees required by consumers and our trade partners, necessitated a change of focus on the delivery of these services. We are confident that these manuals will guide and enable all those responsible for the delivery of a meat safety service, to focus on the new challenges and to claim ownership of the initiative to establish a culture of hygiene awareness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meat We Eat1 Erica L
    Archival copy: for current recommendations see http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu or your local extension office. AN283 Food Processing: The Meat We Eat1 Erica L. Bub, Keith Schneider, Chad Carr, and Matt Hersom2 Recently, the media has focused on certain meat products, Meat Processing giving them names such as “pink slime” and “meat glue.” All of the meat we eat is butchered, packaged, and prepared The names of these products might have many people in some form or another. This processing occurs at meat wondering what we are eating and how the meat we eat is processing facilities under microbiologically sanitary condi- produced. Part of being a good consumer is learning about tions (USDA-FSIS 2012a). Some meat products (e.g., hot what you eat, from how the food is made to whether the dogs and chicken nuggets) are more processed than others food is safe. This publication discusses the facts about meat (e.g., steaks and roasts). The methods used to produce processing so you can make knowledgeable decisions about these further-processed products are designed to improve the meat you eat. efficiency and product yield for processors and to improve the eating quality, value, and convenience of products for consumers. The United States government has inspection standards for all meat and poultry products to ensure the safety, wholesomeness, and accurate labeling of these products. The United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) regulates meat and poultry inspection (USDA-FSIS 2012a). FSIS ensures humane handling and slaughter of animals, inspects all animal carcasses, and sets and verifies food safety standards in meat and poultry processing facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Beef Acceptance Index Proposition
    ARTICLE Beef acceptance index proposition Proposição de um índice de aceitação de carne bovina Thelma Lucchese-Cheung1 , Eduardo Eugênio Spers2 , Matheus Wemersom Gomes Pereira1 , Priscila Caroline Souza Paiva Dias3 1 Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande (SP), Brasil. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz (ESALQ), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba (SP), Brasil. E- mail:[email protected] 3 Programa De Pós Graduação em Administração (PPGAD), Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), Campo Grande (MS), Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] How to cite: Lucchese-Cheung, T., Spers, E. E., Pereira, M. W. G. & Dias, P. C. S. P. (2021). Beef acceptance index proposition. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, 59(2), e223297. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2021.223297 Summary: Beliefs, social rules, and food taboos influence the emotions we feel about food, determining our attitudes and consumption behaviors. The more a product represents values considered important to individuals, the greater the chance of being chosen for consumption. This article aimed to investigate levels of zoophagy and sarcophagy to propose an index to understand consumers' attitudes towards beef. Three hundred and eighty-five people answered a structured questionnaire that allowed them to assess personality traits and attitudes that can explain beef consumption, as well as its rejection. Factor analysis was the analytical model chosen to construct the attitude determination index. For the construction of the General Degradation Index (GDI), an attitude determination index associated with the degree of zoophagy was built first.
    [Show full text]
  • US Army Preservation of Foods
    U.S. ARMY MEDICAL DEPARTMENT CENTER AND SCHOOL FORT SAM HOUSTON, TEXAS 78234-6100 PRESERVATION OF FOODS SUBCOURSE MD0703 EDITION 100 DEVELOPMENT This subcourse is approved for resident and correspondence course instruction. It reflects the current thought of the Academy of Health Sciences and conforms to printed Department of the Army doctrine as closely as currently possible. Development and progress render such doctrine continuously subject to change. ADMINISTRATION For comments or questions regarding enrollment, student records, or shipments, contact the Nonresident Instruction Branch at DSN 471-5877, commercial (210) 221- 5877, toll-free 1-800-344-2380; fax: 210-221-4012 or DSN 471-4012, e-mail [email protected], or write to: COMMANDER AMEDDC&S ATTN MCCS HSN 2105 11TH STREET SUITE 4192 FORT SAM HOUSTON TX 78234-5064 Approved students whose enrollments remain in good standing may apply to the Nonresident Instruction Branch for subsequent courses by telephone, letter, or e-mail. Be sure your social security number is on all correspondence sent to the Academy of Health Sciences. CLARIFICATION OF TRAINING LITERATURE TERMINOLOGY When used in this publication, words such as "he," "him," "his," and "men" are intended to include both the masculine and feminine genders, unless specifically stated otherwise or when obvious in context. TABLE OF CONTENTS Lesson Paragraphs 1 INTRODUCTION TO MICROBIOLOGY Section I. Agents Causing Food Spoilage 1-1--1-13 Section II. Microbial Growth 1-14--1-26 Exercises 2 FOOD MICROBIOLOGY Section I. Microbiology of Dairy Products 2-1--2-5 Section II. Microbiology of Meats 2-6--2-7 Section III.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheep/Goat/Deer Harvest Order Form
    Sheep•Goat•Deer Package 2020-21 Slaughter •Basic Slaughter Rate: $1/lb; $80 per animal min.; 2-4 animal minimum, depending on location: This package includes the kill (except in the case of hunted deer), skinning, evisceration, delivery of carcass to refrigerator and the basic offal harvest. •Circle Desired Offal Harvest: kidneys, heart, liver, spleen, caul fat, Fries (Testicles), Lights (Lungs), hide •Specialty Harvesting: Head Skinning $10, Tongue $3, Stomach rinse $15 *Standard meat hanging fee is $10/carcass. **We charge an extra fee for excessively hair/dirty deer carcasses. v Please note: For the best yield, the physiology of the carcass shapes the cuts as much as the knife does. By working with and not against the carcass, we ensure you receive 100% of hanging weight. Butchery Basic Cut and Wrap: $1/lb ($75 per animal min). How many family members to cut for: ______ Cuts you receive from one Lamb, Goat, or Deer: • Chops 14-18 • 1-2 Breasts • Spare ribs • Sirloin roasts 2-4 • Neck • Leg roasts 2-4 • Shoulder roasts 2-4 • 4 Shanks • 2 Loin roasts • Stock bones Sausage (for large carcasses) •Herb sausage: $4.50/lb bulk (15 lb min) or cased $5.50/lb (15 lb min). Please circle preference for bulk or cased. If you opt out of sausage mark a preference below. ☐ Ground Lamb preferred ($1.75/lb, $15 min) ☐ Stew meat preferred ($1/lb) *We add pork back fat to all lamb sausage. Back fat is sourced from naturally raised pigs grown on Vashon. Dedicating a whole animal to sausage or grinding reduces the cost of butchery by 50%; we charge for pounds ground or sausage plus a flat fee of $10 for bone wrapping.
    [Show full text]
  • Not Fed Antibiotics, No Growth Hormones Ordering Beef About The
    Not Fed Antibiotics, About The Farm No Growth Hormones Aldermere Farm, a landmark of midcoast Maine, is one of the world’s Our cattle are raised using valued “All Natural” premier breeders of Belted Galloway practices, which include no fed antibiotics or cattle. The 136-acre farm is owned and added growth hormones, and are raised on our managed by Maine Coast Heritage high quality pastures and finished with grain Trust, a statewide land conservation supplementation. organization dedicated to protecting Belted Galloway beef is noted for having the scenic beauty, outdoor recreational outstanding flavor and tenderness as compared opportunities, ecological diversity, and to commercial beef sold in stores. working landscapes of the Maine coast. The Trust maintains Aldermere as a Aldermere All Natural Beef working farm and educational center, Nutritional Analysis* helping visitors deepen their appreciation for land conservation and Aldermere USDA sustainable agriculture. Rib Eye Rib Eye Total Calories/100 g 169 306 ARTIN M Fat Calories/100 g 105 234 L Ordering Beef © A Total Fat (g) 11.67 26.10 Call ahead to check on availability Saturated Fat (g) 4.67 10.76 of eighths and quarters. Advance reservations are required for sides. Cholesterol (mg) 47.33 70.00 Contact: Protein (g) 18.67 16.53 [email protected], 207-236-2739 All-Natural Calcium (mg) 15.67 9.00 70 Russell Avenue Pasture-Raised, Grain-Finished CLA (g/100g) 0.11 0.003 Beneficial Fatty Acids Rockport, Maine 04856 Belted Galloway Beef TM Mon.- Fri., 8:00 am - 3:30 pm *Analysis performed by Marshfield Food Safety 1000 North Oak Avenue Bulk quantities of beef can be Marshfield, WI 54449 arranged for pick up at times outside of regular business hours -Results are from Rib Eye cuts with advance payment.
    [Show full text]
  • Pink Slime” Production Has Been Halted in All Plants in the U.S
    From: (b) (6) To: (b) (6) - FSIS Subject: RE: Emailing: Meatingplace.com - Daily News Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 10:04:40 AM I heard this morning on the TODAY show that “pink slime” production has been halted in all plants in the U.S. except one in So. Dakota. From: (b) (6) - FSIS [mailto:(b) (6) @fsis.usda.gov] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 8:53 PM To: (b) (6) Subject: Emailing: Meatingplace.com - Daily News As the Meat Turns! This electronic message contains information generated by the USDA solely for the intended recipients. Any unauthorized interception of this message or the use or disclosure of the information it contains may violate the law and subject the violator to civil or criminal penalties. If you believe you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete the email immediately. From: (b) (6) - FSIS To: (b) (6) - FSIS Subject: RE: complaints today? Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 3:13:30 PM I’ve had 3. I hung up on the last caller because he was yelling at me for 5 minutes. ______ _________________________ From: (b) (6) - FSIS Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:59 PM To: (b) (6) - FSIS; (b) (6) - FSIS; (b) (6) - FSIS; (b) (6) - Commissioned Corps - FSIS; (b) (6) - FSIS Subject: FW: complaints today? No CCMS ones from me.. (b) (6) Folks, I would like to know if you all had any “pink slime” calls today – if so, how many, please? Thank you (b) (6) From: (b) (6) - Commissioned Corps - FSIS To: (b) (6) - FSIS Subject: RE: complaints today? Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 3:17:27 PM Rien (none) (b) (6) _____________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Little Cookbooks – Accent – Accent International, Skokie, Illinois
    Little Cookbooks – Accent – Accent International, Skokie, Illinois No Date – Good. Accent Cookout Recipes open up a wonderful world of flavor through seasoning. Vertical three-folded black and white sheet. Each panel 5” x 3 3/5”. No Date – Very Good. Accent Flavor Enhancer Serve Half, Freeze Half. Saves your budget …time…and energy! Everyone is looking for ways to serve good-tasting nutritious meals yet stay within the food budget. “Freeze Half. Serve Half” helps you to do just that! Vertical three-folded beige and brown sheet. Each panel 5” x 3”. No Date – Very Good. “Great American Recipes” Magazine insert. Title in red with servings of food and package of Accent in the center. Food in color. Recipes on three panels. Single folded sheet. Each panel 5” x 3”. 11/29/05 Little Cookbooks – Ace Hi – California Milling Corporation, 55th and Alameda, Los Angeles, California 1937 – Fine. Personally Proven Recipes BREAD, BISCUITS, PASTRY. California Milling Corporation, 55th and Alameda, Los Angeles, California. Modern drawing of woman in yellow dress, white apron holding Ace-Hi recipe book. Royal blue background. Back: Ace Hi in bright pink in circle and Family Flour and Packaged Cereals on royal blue background. 4 ¾”x 6 1/8”, no page numbers. 02/13/06 Little Cookbooks – Adcock Pecans – Adcock Pecans, Tifton, Georgia No date – Very Good. Enjoy ADCOCK’S FRESH Papershell Pecans prize-winning Recipes inside . Four folded sheet, blue and white. Brown pecan under title. Each panel, 3 ½”x 8 ½”. 8/21/05 Little Cookbooks – Airline Bee Products – The A. I. Root Company, Medina, Ohio 1915 – Poor.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Caribou
    +XQWLQJ&DULERX .DU\Q6KDUS+HQU\66KDUS 3XEOLVKHGE\8QLYHUVLW\RI1HEUDVND3UHVV .DU\Q6KDUSDQG+HQU\66KDUS +XQWLQJ&DULERX6XEVLVWHQFH+XQWLQJDORQJWKH1RUWKHUQ(GJHRIWKH%RUHDO)RUHVW /LQFROQ8QLYHUVLW\RI1HEUDVND3UHVV 3URMHFW086( :HE$SUKWWSPXVHMKXHGX For additional information about this book http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780803277373 Access provided by New York University (4 May 2015 13:30 GMT) Text 2 Food Storage braham was of the generation of elders in 1972. His approach to killing a large animal reflected the prac- A tice of times when the Denésuliné lived in the bush and only occasionally came into the settlements that surrounded the trading posts, rather than the practices that had become customary among those who lived in the new permanent and far larger village. He was more concerned with the proper distribution of the moose meat among his kin, affines, and friends than he was in storing meat for his own use during the coming winter. The practice of widely distributing the meat of a large kill had largely vanished among the then contemporary Denésu- liné. Some meat was still distributed along lines of kinship and affinality if those kin and affines happened to reside (and were present) in the village and if relations between the peo- ple involved were positive, but the portion of the meat of a kill that was distributed was rapidly declining. There were even instances in which small portions of meat from a large kill were being sold to non-kin. Among the reasons for these changes were necessary adaptations to village life. The vil- lage at that time numbered somewhat more than five hundred souls.
    [Show full text]