DOCSLIB.ORG

Civil Society Recommendations to the Participants of the Osce Ministerial Council Meeting in Basel, 4-5 December 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Civil Society Recommendations to the Participants of the Osce Ministerial Council Meeting in Basel, 4-5 December 2014 CIO.GAL/229/14 5 December 2014 Distributed at the request of the Swiss OSCE Chairmanship ENGLISH only CIVIL SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE OSCE MINISTERIAL COUNCIL MEETING IN BASEL, 4-5 DECEMBER 2014 civicsolidarity.org CIVIL SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE OSCE MINISTERIAL COUNCIL MEETING IN BASEL, 4-5 DECEMBER 2014 The Civic Solidarity Platform, a network of more than 60 human rights NGOs from throughout the OSCE region,1 convened the 2014 OSCE Parallel Civil Society Conference in Basel on 2-3 December, building upon the tradition of OSCE parallel civil society conferences in Astana in 2010, Vilnius in 2011, Dublin in 2012, and Kiev in 2013. At the conference, activists from Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, France, Finland, Georgia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania, Moldova, the Netherlands, Norway, Russia, Serbia, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, and the USA discussed and adopted the attached policy document, developed by the Civic Solidarity Platform and containing civil society analysis and recommendations on alarming human dimension issues across the OSCE region, on human dimensions issues in Switzerland, in light of the country’s OSCE Chairmanship, and human dimensions issues in Serbia, in light of the country’s incoming OSCE Chairmanship. It also includes reflections on the impact of the crisis in Ukraine on comprehensive security in Europe as well as recommendations for enhanced engagement of civil society in the OSCE work. Many of the recommendations are based on results of the work of regional OSCE civil society workshop, held throughout 2014 in Belgrade, Vienna, Dushanbe, and Tbilisi. They were organized jointly by the Civic Solidarity Platform and local civil society organisations with support from the Swiss OSCE Chairmanship and brought together more than 150 representatives of civil society organisations from across the OSCE region as well as experts from international NGOs and OSCE institutions. The outcome document is addressed to governments of the OSCE participating States that will be gathering in Basel for this year’s meeting of the Ministerial Council, as well as all the OSCE political bodies and institutions, including the current and the incoming Chairmanships, the Permanent Council, the Human Dimension Committee, ODIHR, the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, the OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities, the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media, and the OSCE field missions. We hope that this analysis and the recommendations that flow from it will be studied carefully at the Ministerial Council meeting and in the work of OSCE. We look forward to reaction from all interested stakeholders. While some of our recommendations may be implemented immediately, others relate to systemic problems and will require consistent effort over a longer period of time. We express our commitment as civil society actors to continue to actively engage in the work of OSCE in the spirit of the Helsinki Principles and our determination to contribute to the full realization of respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, democracy and the rule of law throughout the OSCE region. 1 The Civic Solidarity Platform was established in December 2011 in Vilnius on the eve of the OSCE Parallel Civil Society Conference. Since then it has grown to more than 60 member organisations from across the OSCE region. For more information about the Civic Solidarity Platform please visit the Platform’s web site civicsolidarity.org. The core group of the founders of the Platform had organized earlier the OSCE Parallel Civil Society Conference in Astana on the eve of the OSCE Summit in December 2010 and has been organising OSCE Parallel Civil Society Conferences since then. For outcome documents of the OSCE Parallel Conferences in Astana, Vilnius, Dublin and Kiev visit http://civicsolidarity.org/page/osce-parallel-civil-society-conferences-outcome-documents. 1 Contents: Comprehensive Security in the OSCE region: The Effects of 2014 Events 3 Civic Solidarity Platform’s Human Dimension Priorities for 2015 7 Alarming Trends in Observation of Fundamental Human Rights in the OSCE Region: Freedom of expression 11 Freedom of assembly 15 Freedom of association 19 Security of human rights defenders 23 Combating intolerance, discrimination, hate crime and hate speech 27 Prevention of torture 35 Enforced Disappearances 45 Independence of the judiciary, right to fair trial and the problem of politically motivated persecution 49 The right to privacy and protection of personal data 55 The right to free and fair elections 59 Human Dimension Issues in Switzerland 63 Human Dimension Issues in Serbia, Requiring Special Attention 71 Enhancing Civil Society Input in OSCE Activities 79 Basel Declaration: Rising Intolerance, Discrimination, and Hate Crimes Pose a Major Risk for Security and Require a Coordinated Response from the OSCE 85 2 Comprehensive Security in the OSCE Region: The Effects of the 2014 Events It is four years now since the heads of state and government of the OSCE participating States solemnly recommitted themselves “to the vision of a free, democratic, common and indivisible Euro-Atlantic and Eurasian security community stretching from Vancouver to Vladivostok, rooted in agreed principles, shared commitments and common goals” (Astana Commemorative Declaration, 3 December 2010). They said that “each participating State has an equal right to security. We reaffirm the inherent right of each and every participating State to be free to choose or change its security arrangements, including treaties of alliance, as they evolve.” Today the vision expressed in the Helsinki Final Act of 1975 is more imperiled than ever. One of the most powerful states in the OSCE, the Russian Federation, is increasingly operating in a manner at odds with the principles confirmed time and again since 1975. The year 2014 witnessed gross violations of the positions reconfirmed explicitly as recently as in 2010. While the 2010 statement said that no state, group of states or organization “can consider any part of the OSCE area as its sphere of influence”, precisely the “need” for such a sphere of influence is used as an argument for armed interference, invasion, occupation and annexation, accompanied by gross violations of human rights and international humanitarian law. As the conflict in Ukraine has developed, such violations have, unfortunately, been committed by all parties, in the process alienating many of the people they pretend to protect and increasing polarization and hatred. There also seems a real danger of other, “frozen” conflicts heating up in the wake of the conflict in Ukraine. Millions of citizens have been subjected to lawlessness and to serious danger of humanitarian disaster. The primary goal of each and every party and person in the conflict should be to reverse this situation. Ukraine should recognize the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, creating a safety net with respect to prosecution and punishment of gross human rights abuses and war crimes. Civil society activists working peacefully and unarmed to assist civilians and document the human rights situation should not be harmed or hindered by the parties, neither should journalists be murdered or held captive. It is high time for a return to respect for the basic principle of the OSCE: peaceful rather than violent resolution of conflicts. The capacity of the OSCE as a unique forum “for promoting open dialogue, preventing and settling conflicts, building mutual understanding and fostering co-operation” (once again a quote from the Astana Declaration) should be exploited to the full. Mutual understanding in the Helsinki spirit applies not just to state leaders and officials but to all citizens. In the current crisis a first step towards mutual understanding is the provision of impartial, non-propagandistic information. The OSCE, with its Special Monitoring Mission, is in a unique position to contribute such information, and ways should be sought to expand this capacity, including through direct broadcasting to the region. The OSCE mission’s size, composition and equipment should be adapted to make this possible. Citizens working in the conflict zone to assist victims of violence, monitor human rights and raise abuses with the parties to the conflict merit special attention from the OSCE mission; they are in a vulnerable position and yet their work is of great importance, including their ability to provide valuable information about the situation of civilians to the OSCE mission. *** 3 Concerns about the situation of minorities in other states are not illegitimate. As with all OSCE principles and commitments, the rights of minorities are one of the “matters of immediate and legitimate concern”, as noted in the Astana Declaration. To deal with problems in this area, however, the services of the High Commissioner on National Minorities should be called on rather than force or the threat of force. The HCNM’s Bolzano/Bozen Recommendations on National Minorities in Inter-State Relations should guide the behavior of the Russian Federation in the conflict with Ukraine and in its concerns about minorities in other neighbouring countries. A series of other HCNM Recommendations provides guidance to states on their policies towards minorities on their own territories, and are relevant to both states involved in the current conflict. This conflict once again demonstrates how disrespect for OSCE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • White Elephants, Environmental Degradation and Circassian Marginalization in Post-Olympics Sochi Bo Peter
    Vanished in the Haze: White Elephants, Environmental Degradation and Circassian Marginalization in Post-Olympics Sochi Bo Petersson & Karina Vamling Before the Olympic Winter Games in Sochi in 2014 there was an intense international discussion on the wanting Russian record on democracy and human rights and the appropriateness of organizing such mega-events in authoritarian settings. These kinds of discussions had a familiar ring to them; similar voices were heard before the Beijing Summer Olympics in 2008. However, what was notable in the scholarly discussion after the Beijing Olympics was a lack of substantiated follow-up with regard to political and social consequences of the Games. Once the Olympic Games were launched, the sports events themselves took over the public limelight. Further to this, media logics seem to dictate that once any Games are over, critical discussions are over and done with, and the attention is gradually shifted to the next mega-event to follow, in the Sochi case the Summer Games in Rio in 2016 and the FIFA World Cup in football which will be arranged in several locations in Russia in 2018. In the case of the Sochi Games, the fading from attention was exacerbated by the dramatic events which unfolded around Ukraine and the Russian role in them which came to dominate newscasts from a time when the Games had barely even been concluded. With regard to Sochi, as for all sites of major sports events, continued critical attention is called for to assess political developments on the local, regional and central levels of the state even after the conclusion of the Games.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Aggression in Eastern Europe: Where Does Putin Go Next After Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova?
    S. HRG. 114–130 RUSSIAN AGGRESSION IN EASTERN EUROPE: WHERE DOES PUTIN GO NEXT AFTER UKRAINE, GEORGIA, AND MOLDOVA? HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPE AND REGIONAL SECURITY COOPERATION OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION MARCH 4, 2015 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Relations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 97–882 PDF WASHINGTON : 2015 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 14:59 Dec 15, 2015 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\FULL COMMITTEE\HEARING FILES\114FIRST\2015 ISSUE HEARINGS GONE TO PRE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS BOB CORKER, TENNESSEE, Chairman JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho ROBERT MENENDEZ, New Jersey MARCO RUBIO, Florida BARBARA BOXER, California RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland JEFF FLAKE, Arizona JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire CORY GARDNER, Colorado CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware DAVID PERDUE, Georgia TOM UDALL, New Mexico JOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Connecticut RAND PAUL, Kentucky TIM KAINE, Virginia JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts LESTER E. MUNSON III, Staff Director JODI B. HERMAN, Democratic Staff Director —————— SUBCOMMITTEE ON EUROPE AND REGIONAL SECURITY COOPERATION RON JOHNSON, Wisconsin, Chairman RAND PAUL, Kentucky JEANNE SHAHEEN, New Hampshire JAMES E. RISCH, Idaho CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, Connecticut CORY GARDNER, Colorado TIM KAINE, Virginia JOHN BARRASSO, Wyoming EDWARD J.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia | Freedom House Page 1 of 7
    Russia | Freedom House Page 1 of 7 Russia freedomhouse.org The Russian political environment in 2014 was dominated by events in neighboring Ukraine. In February, a mass protest movement—triggered in late 2013 by corrupt, Russian-aligned president Viktor Yanukovych’s refusal to sign an Association Agreement with the European Union (EU)—overcame police violence and forced the unpopular leader to flee to Russia. To discourage any similar movement inside Russia and regain leverage over Ukraine, Russian president Vladimir Putin ordered a military invasion. Crimea was occupied and formally annexed to the Russian Federation in March, and despite Kremlin denials, Russian troops played a role in ongoing separatist violence in Ukraine’s easternmost regions. The intervention was justified with claims that ethnic Russians in Ukraine were threatened by Ukrainian ultranationalists who had supposedly seized power in Kyiv. While Russia’s relations with Europe and the United States had already been deteriorating, the invasion of Ukraine forced the democratic powers to respond. The United States, the EU, and other allied countries imposed a series of sanctions that targeted individuals around Putin, key companies that support his regime or allegedly manage his illicit wealth, and important economic sectors like banking and energy. The sanctions, combined with plummeting world oil prices and existing economic weaknesses in Russia, helped to fuel capital flight, a dramatically falling ruble, and a deepening budget deficit. Russia’s own countersanctions, targeting European agricultural imports and other goods, only added to the suffering of businesses and consumers. Faced with international pressure and the rising potential for domestic discontent, the government expanded its control of the media, stepped up a propaganda campaign to justify its actions and vilify its opponents, and cracked down on independent news outlets, particularly online.
    [Show full text]
  • Amnesty International Report 2014/15 the State of the World's Human Rights
    defenders, independent journalists and 1. Romania falls short of its international human rights obligations on lawyers continuing to face personal risks in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (EUR 39/004/2014) their work. www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR39/004/2014/en 2. Romanian local authorities must provide housing for homeless BACKGROUND families after forced eviction (EUR 39/018/2013) In February, Russia hosted the well-attended www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR39/018/2013/enRomania: Winter Olympic Games in Sochi. By the end Families homeless after forced eviction (EUR 39/019/2013) of the year, following its annexation of Crimea www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR39/019/2013/enRomanian from Ukraine in March and its continuing government is failing homeless Roma in Eforie Sud (EUR support for separatists in Ukraine’s eastern 39/021/2013) region of Donbass, Russia was facing www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR39/021/2013/enRomania: increasing international isolation. Submission to the Pre-sessional Working Group of the UN Committee The Russian authorities adopted an on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 53rd meeting (EUR increasingly belligerent anti-Western and anti- 39/02/2014) Ukrainian rhetoric, which was widely echoed www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR39/002/2014/en in the government-controlled mainstream 3. How the EBRD’s funding contributed to forced evictions in Craica, media. Despite growing economic difficulties Romania (EUR 39/001/2014) and projected cuts in social spending - www.amnesty.org/en/library/info/EUR39/001/2014/en caused in part by Western sanctions and falling oil prices (Russia’s major export commodity), and corruption - the Russian leadership enjoyed a surge in popular support, fuelled in large measure by the RUSSIAN widely hailed annexation of Crimea (which had been under Russian administration in the FEDERATION Soviet Union until 1954).
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H398
    H398 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE January 12, 2017 This is not just withholding payment this, Mr. Speaker, because we have a RUSSIA AND PRESIDENT PUTIN for a period of time; this is a complete President-elect who has said he will be The SPEAKER pro tempore. The forfeiture. a law and order President. I want to Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from I propose a balanced budget amend- make a distinction between law and Ohio (Ms. KAPTUR) for 5 minutes. ment so we are forced to stop kicking order and justice, and I want to at- Ms. KAPTUR. Mr. Speaker, I come to the can down the road and will create tribute this to the Justice Department the floor today as co-chair and found- a fiscal path that will allow the next versus a law and order department. ing member of the Polish, Hungarian, generation to thrive. Mr. Speaker, you can have law and and Ukrainian House Caucuses. I also have a bill I call the Citizen order in a dungeon, but you won’t have I am also a strong defender of NATO Legislature Anti-Corruption Reform justice. There is law and order in North and of its purpose in linking the free Act, or CLEAN Act, a bill that ends Korea, but you don’t have justice. Jus- nations of Europe and the United congressional pensions for life and re- tice, Mr. Speaker, is what this Depart- States through this historic, hard-won quires this body to debate and act on ment is all about. It is not the law and alliance and security treaty among Eu- single-issue legislation, codify that all order department.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Watch Country Summary
    JANUARY 2015 COUNTRY SUMMARY Russia The Kremlin took another leap backward in 2014 by intensifying its crackdown on civil society, media, and the Internet, as it sought to control the narrative about developments in Ukraine, including Russia’s occupation of Crimea and its support to insurgents in eastern Ukraine. Parliament adopted laws, and authorities engaged in practices, that increasingly isolated the country and inflamed a level of anti-Western hysteria unseen since the Soviet era. Freedom of Association In June, parliament amended Russia’s 2012 “Foreign Agent” law, which demonizes advocacy groups that accept foreign funding, by authorizing the Justice Ministry to register groups as foreign agents without their consent. By November, the ministry had forcibly registered 17 independent groups as such. On December 17, the Supreme Court was due to review a Justice Ministry complaint against the Memorial umbrella organization requesting its closure under the pretext of technical breach of Russia’s nongovernmental organization (NGO) legislation. In September, a court vacated a previous ruling against Golos, an election monitoring group, for failing to register as a “foreign agent” due to lack of evidence that the group accepted foreign funding. However, at time of writing Golos remained on the “foreign agents” registry. Freedom of Expression Russian authorities blocked several independent media websites, adopted new laws, and proposed yet more measures that would further stifle freedom of expression. 1 In January 2014, TV Rain, one of Russia’s few independent television stations, lost access to cable and satellite television after it posted a viewers’ poll about whether the USSR should have surrendered Leningrad during World War II to save lives.
    [Show full text]
  • A Net Assessment of Developments in Eurasia Since the Start of 2014
    A Net AssessmeNt of DevelopmeNts iN eurAsiA iNce the tArt of s s 2014 November 2014 WAshiNgtoN, Dc A Net Assessment of Developments in Eurasia Since the Start of 2014 November 2014 Washington, DC THE JAMESTOWN FOUNDATION Published in the United States by The Jamestown Foundation 1111 16th St. N.W. Suite 320 Washington, D.C. 20036 http://www.jamestown.org Copyright © The Jamestown Foundation, November 2014 All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written consent. For copyright permissions information, contact The Jamestown Foundation. The views expressed in this report are those of the contributing authors and not necessarily those of The Jamestown Foundation. For more information on this report or The Jamestown Foundation, email [email protected]. JAMESTOWN’S MISSION The Jamestown Foundation’s mission is to inform and educate policymakers and the broader policy community about events and trends in those societies, which are strategically or tactically important to the United States and which frequently restrict access to such information. Utilizing indigenous and primary sources, Jamestown’s material is delivered without political bias, filter or agenda. It is often the only source of information that should be, but is not always, available through official or intelligence channels, especially with regard to Eurasia and terrorism. Origins Launched in 1984 after Jamestown’s late president and founder William Geimer’s work with Arkady Shevchenko, the highest-ranking Soviet official ever to defect when he left his position as undersecretary general of the United Nations, the Jamestown Foundation rapidly became the leading source of information about the inner workings of closed totalitarian societies.
    [Show full text]
  • Pen International Writers in Prison Committee Caselist
    PEN INTERNATIONAL WRITERS IN PRISON COMMITTEE CASELIST January-December 2014 PEN International Writers in Prison Committee 50/51 High Holborn London WC1V 6ER United Kingdom Tel: + 44 020 74050338 Fax: + 44 020 74050339 e-mail: [email protected] web site: www.pen-international.org PEN INTERNATIONAL CHARTER The P.E.N. Charter is based on resolutions passed at its International Congresses and may be summarised as follows: P.E.N. affirms that: 1. Literature knows no frontiers and must remain common currency among people in spite of political or international upheavals. 2. In all circumstances, and particularly in time of war, works of art, the patrimony of humanity at large, should be left untouched by national or political passion. 3. Members of P.E.N. should at all times use what influence they have in favour of good understanding and mutual respect between nations; they pledge themselves to do their utmost to dispel race, class and national hatreds, and to champion the ideal of one humanity living in peace in one world. 4. P.E.N. stands for the principle of unhampered transmission of thought within each nation and between all nations, and members pledge themselves to oppose any form of suppression of freedom of expression in the country and community to which they belong, as well as throughout the world wherever this is possible. P.E.N. declares for a free press and opposes arbitrary censorship in time of peace. It believes that the necessary advance of the world towards a more highly organized political and economic order renders a free criticism of governments, administrations and institutions imperative.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia 2014 Human Rights Report
    RUSSIA 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Russian Federation has a highly centralized, increasingly authoritarian political system dominated by President Vladimir Putin. The bicameral Federal Assembly consists of a directly elected lower house (State Duma) and an appointed upper house (Federation Council), but these bodies lacked independence from the executive. The State Duma elections in 2011 and the presidential election in 2012 were marked by accusations of government interference and manipulation of the electoral process. Security forces generally reported to civilian authorities, although in some areas of the North Caucasus, especially Dagestan and Kabardino- Balkaria, civilian authorities did not exercise full control over security forces. In February the armed forces unlawfully entered Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula and then occupied and attempted to “annex” the Crimean peninsula in March. The international community denounced the occupation and refused to recognize the country’s purported annexation of Crimea. The government also trained, equipped, and supplied pro-Russia “separatist” forces in Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts of eastern Ukraine, who were joined by numerous fighters from Russia. International monitors and human rights nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) attributed thousands of civilian deaths and injuries, as well as widespread human rights abuses, to Russia-backed separatists in the Donbas region and the Russian occupation authorities in Crimea (for details see Ukraine report). The conflict in Ukraine also resulted in a high degree of lawlessness along the country’s border with Ukraine, notably associated with several high-profile abductions of Ukrainian citizens, the unrestricted movement of separatist militants and Russian government forces between Russia and Ukraine, and the flow of refugees and asylum seekers across the border into the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Society Recommendations to the Participants of the Osce Ministerial Council Meeting in Basel, 4-5 December 2014
    CIVIL SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE OSCE MINISTERIAL COUNCIL MEETING IN BASEL, 4-5 DECEMBER 2014 civicsolidarity.org CIVIL SOCIETY RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE PARTICIPANTS OF THE OSCE MINISTERIAL COUNCIL MEETING IN BASEL, 4-5 DECEMBER 2014 The Civic Solidarity Platform, a network of more than 60 human rights NGOs from throughout the OSCE region,1 convened the 2014 OSCE Parallel Civil Society Conference in Basel on 2-3 December, building upon the tradition of OSCE parallel civil society conferences in Astana in 2010, Vilnius in 2011, Dublin in 2012, and Kiev in 2013. At the conference, activists from Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, France, Finland, Georgia, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania, Moldova, the Netherlands, Norway, Russia, Serbia, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, the United Kingdom, and the USA discussed and adopted the attached policy document, developed by the Civic Solidarity Platform and containing civil society analysis and recommendations on alarming human dimension issues across the OSCE region, on human dimensions issues in Switzerland, in light of the country’s OSCE Chairmanship, and human dimensions issues in Serbia, in light of the country’s incoming OSCE Chairmanship. It also includes reflections on the impact of the crisis in Ukraine on comprehensive security in Europe as well as recommendations for enhanced engagement of civil society in the OSCE work. Many of the recommendations are based on results of the work of regional OSCE civil society workshop, held throughout 2014 in Belgrade, Vienna, Dushanbe, and Tbilisi. They were organized jointly by the Civic Solidarity Platform and local civil society organisations with support from the Swiss OSCE Chairmanship and brought together more than 150 representatives of civil society organisations from across the OSCE region as well as experts from international NGOs and OSCE institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists Assassinated Journalists in Russian Federation
    UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists Assassinated Journalists in Russian Federation Orkhan Dzhemal Reporter Alexander Rastorguyev Documentary filmmaker Kirill Radchenko Cameraman (Russian) Killed in Central African Republic on 30 July 2018 UNESCO Statement Denis Suvorov (Russian Federation) Television journalist at Rossia Nizhny Novgorod Killed in July in the Russian Federation (body found on 23 July) 2018 UNESCO Statement Response from Member State 2018 [Response from Member State 2017] Dimitri Popkov (Russian) Investigative reporter Killed on 24 May [UNESCO statement] Nikolay Andrushchenko (Russian) Co-founder and editor of the newspaper Novy Petersburg Died on 19 April 2017 in the Russian Federation [UNESCO Statement] Timur Kuashev (Russian) Correspondent for Dosh magazine Found dead on 1 August 2014 in Russian Federation [UNESCO Statement] [Response from Member State 2016] (in Russian) Akhmednabi Akhmednabiyev 1 UNESCO Condemns Killing of Journalists Assassinated Journalists in Russian Federation (Russian) Deputy editor of the Novoye Delo weekly newspaper Killed on 9 July 2013 in Russian Federation [UNESCO Statement] [Response from Member State 2016] (in Russian) Mikhail Beketov (Russian) Former editor in chief of Khimkinskaya Pravda Killed on 8 April 2013 in Russian Federation [UNESCO Statement] [Response from Member State 2016] (in Russian) Kazbek Gekkiyev (Russian) Television news presenter for the All-Russia State Television and Radio Company (VGTRK) Killed on 5 December 2012 in Russian Federation [UNESCO Statement] [Response
    [Show full text]
  • The State of Whistleblower & Journalist Protections
    THE STATE OF WHISTLEBLOWER & JOURNALIST PROTECTIONS GLOBALLY: A Customary Legal Analysis of Representative Cases May 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ......................................................................................................................... 1 Abbreviations and Acronyms...................................................................................................... 3 I. Introduction............................................................................................................................... 6 II. Methodology............................................................................................................................. 7 III. Country Reports: Asia-Pacific.............................................................................................. 9 A. Australia.................................................................................................................. 9 B. China...................................................................................................................... 14 C. India....................................................................................................................... 17 D. Indonesia............................................................................................................... 20 E. Regional Analysis................................................................................................. 24 IV. Country Reports: Sub-Saharan Africa.............................................................................
    [Show full text]