DOCSLIB.ORG

Pre-Application Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pre-Application Document PRE-APPLICATION DOCUMENT NUYAKUK RIVER HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC NO. 14873 Submitted by: Nushagak Electric & Telephone Cooperative, Inc. P.O. Box 350 Dillingham, AK 99576 September 2019 Nuyakuk River Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 14873 Pre-Application Document TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ v LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ...................................................................................... ix 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROCESS PLAN AND SCHEDULE (18 CFR §5.6 (D)(1)) ............................................. 5 2.1 Integrated Licensing Process .................................................................................. 5 2.2 Authorized Agent .................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Proposed Communications Protocol ....................................................................... 7 2.3.1 Contact Lists ............................................................................................... 7 2.3.2 Document Distribution................................................................................ 7 2.3.3 Sensitive Information .................................................................................. 8 2.3.4 Meetings ...................................................................................................... 8 3.0 PROJECT LOCATION, FACILITIES, AND OPERATION (18 CFR §5.6 (D)(2)) ......... 9 3.1 Project Location ...................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Project Lands .......................................................................................................... 9 3.3 Project Facilities.................................................................................................... 23 3.3.1 Summary of Project Features .................................................................... 24 3.3.2 Nuyakuk Falls Diversion & Intake ........................................................... 26 3.3.3 Conveyance Tunnels to Powerhouse ........................................................ 27 3.3.4 Trifurcation to Turbine Units .................................................................... 27 3.3.5 Powerhouse ............................................................................................... 28 3.3.6 Tailrace ..................................................................................................... 28 3.3.7 Switchyard / Transmission Line/Switchyard ............................................ 28 3.3.8 Proposed Construction and Development Schedule ........................ 29 3.4 Project Operation .................................................................................................. 29 3.4.1 Proposed Project Operations ..................................................................... 29 3.4.2 Project Capacity and Production ............................................................... 31 4.0 DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCE IMPACTS (18 CFR §5.6 (D)(3)) .............................................................................................................. 32 4.1 General Description of the River Basin ................................................................ 32 4.1.1 Topography ............................................................................................... 32 4.1.2 Climate ...................................................................................................... 34 Nushagak Cooperative, Inc. i September 2019 Nuyakuk River Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 14873 Pre-Application Document 4.2 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................. 34 4.2.1 Geology ..................................................................................................... 34 4.2.2 Soils........................................................................................................... 35 4.2.3 Seismicity .................................................................................................. 39 4.2.4 Potential Adverse Effects .......................................................................... 41 4.3 Water Resources ................................................................................................... 41 4.3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 41 4.3.2 Drainage Basin Hydrology ....................................................................... 41 4.3.3 Water Uses ................................................................................................ 42 4.3.4 Historical Water Quality Data .................................................................. 43 4.3.5 Current Water Quality Data ...................................................................... 47 4.3.6 Potential Adverse Effects .......................................................................... 48 4.4 Fish and Aquatic Resources .................................................................................. 49 4.4.1 Fish and Aquatic Resources Overview ..................................................... 49 4.4.2 Invasive Fish and Aquatic Species ........................................................... 53 4.4.3 Federal and State Designated Habitats ..................................................... 54 4.4.4 Aquatic, Fish, and Riparian Habitat .......................................................... 54 4.4.5 Instream Flows .......................................................................................... 56 4.4.6 Potential Adverse Effects .......................................................................... 57 4.5 Wildlife and Botanical Resources ......................................................................... 58 4.5.1 Wildlife Resources .................................................................................... 58 4.5.2 Botanical Resources and Habitat Types ................................................... 77 4.5.3 Potential Adverse Effects .......................................................................... 81 4.6 Wetlands, Riparian and Littoral Habitat ............................................................... 82 4.6.1 Potential Adverse Effects .......................................................................... 84 4.7 Threatened, and Endangered Species ................................................................... 85 4.7.1 Potential Adverse Effects .......................................................................... 85 4.8 Recreation and Land Use ...................................................................................... 85 4.8.1 Current Recreational Use of the Project Vicinity and Region .................. 87 4.8.2 Recreation Needs and Management Goals ............................................... 89 4.8.3 Non-Recreational Land Use and Management ......................................... 92 4.8.4 Protected River Segments ......................................................................... 93 Nushagak Cooperative, Inc. ii September 2019 Nuyakuk River Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 14873 Pre-Application Document 4.8.5 National Trails System and Wilderness Areas.......................................... 93 4.8.6 Shoreline Buffer Zones ............................................................................. 93 4.8.7 Potential Adverse Effects .......................................................................... 93 4.9 Aesthetics and Visual Resources .......................................................................... 94 4.9.1 Potential Adverse Effects .......................................................................... 94 4.10 Cultural and Tribal Resources .............................................................................. 95 4.10.1 Applicable Laws and Regulations ............................................................ 97 4.10.2 Ethnographic and Historical Overview ..................................................... 98 4.10.3 Cultural Resources in the Project Vicinity.............................................. 101 4.10.4 Potential Adverse Effects ........................................................................ 102 4.11 Socioeconomic Resources .................................................................................. 102 4.11.1 General Land Use Patterns...................................................................... 102 4.11.2 Demographics ......................................................................................... 105 4.11.3 Industry and Employment ....................................................................... 106 4.11.4 Electricity ................................................................................................ 108 4.11.5 Potential Adverse Effects ........................................................................ 108 5.0 PRELIMINARY ISSUES AND STUDIES LIST (18 CFR § 5.6 (D)(4)) ...................... 108 5.1 Issues Pertaining to the Identified Resources ..................................................... 109 5.2 Potential Studies or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bristol Bay, Alaska
    EPA 910-R-14-001C | January 2014 An Assessment of Potential Mining Impacts on Salmon Ecosystems of Bristol Bay, Alaska Volume 3 – Appendices E-J Region 10, Seattle, WA www.epa.gov/bristolbay EPA 910-R-14-001C January 2014 AN ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL MINING IMPACTS ON SALMON ECOSYSTEMS OF BRISTOL BAY, ALASKA VOLUME 3—APPENDICES E-J U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 Seattle, WA CONTENTS VOLUME 1 An Assessment of Potential Mining Impacts on Salmon Ecosystems of Bristol Bay, Alaska VOLUME 2 APPENDIX A: Fishery Resources of the Bristol Bay Region APPENDIX B: Non-Salmon Freshwater Fishes of the Nushagak and Kvichak River Drainages APPENDIX C: Wildlife Resources of the Nushagak and Kvichak River Watersheds, Alaska APPENDIX D: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Characterization of the Indigenous Cultures of the Nushagak and Kvichak Watersheds, Alaska VOLUME 3 APPENDIX E: Bristol Bay Wild Salmon Ecosystem: Baseline Levels of Economic Activity and Values APPENDIX F: Biological Characterization: Bristol Bay Marine Estuarine Processes, Fish, and Marine Mammal Assemblages APPENDIX G: Foreseeable Environmental Impact of Potential Road and Pipeline Development on Water Quality and Freshwater Fishery Resources of Bristol Bay, Alaska APPENDIX H: Geologic and Environmental Characteristics of Porphyry Copper Deposits with Emphasis on Potential Future Development in the Bristol Bay Watershed, Alaska APPENDIX I: Conventional Water Quality Mitigation Practices for Mine Design, Construction, Operation, and Closure APPENDIX J: Compensatory Mitigation and Large-Scale Hardrock Mining in the Bristol Bay Watershed AN ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL MINING IMPACTS ON SALMON ECOSYSTEMS OF BRISTOL BAY, ALASKA VOLUME 3—APPENDICES E-J Appendix E: Bristol Bay Wild Salmon Ecosystem: Baseline Levels of Economic Activity and Values Bristol Bay Wild Salmon Ecosystem Baseline Levels of Economic Activity and Values John Duffield Chris Neher David Patterson Bioeconomics, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Book
    January 21-25, 2013 Alaska Marine Science Symposium hotel captain cook & Dena’ina center • anchorage, alaska Bill Rome Glenn Aronmits Hansen Kira Ross McElwee ShowcaSing ocean reSearch in the arctic ocean, Bering Sea, and gulf of alaSka alaskamarinescience.org Glenn Aronmits Index This Index follows the chronological order of the 2013 AMSS Keynote and Plenary speakers Poster presentations follow and are in first author alphabetical order according to subtopic, within their LME category Editor: Janet Duffy-Anderson Organization: Crystal Benson-Carlough Abstract Review Committee: Carrie Eischens (Chair), George Hart, Scott Pegau, Danielle Dickson, Janet Duffy-Anderson, Thomas Van Pelt, Francis Wiese, Warren Horowitz, Marilyn Sigman, Darcy Dugan, Cynthia Suchman, Molly McCammon, Rosa Meehan, Robin Dublin, Heather McCarty Cover Design: Eric Cline Produced by: NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center / North Pacific Research Board Printed by: NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, Washington www.alaskamarinescience.org i ii Welcome and Keynotes Monday January 21 Keynotes Cynthia Opening Remarks & Welcome 1:30 – 2:30 Suchman 2:30 – 3:00 Jeremy Mathis Preparing for the Challenges of Ocean Acidification In Alaska 30 Testing the Invasion Process: Survival, Dispersal, Genetic Jessica Miller Characterization, and Attenuation of Marine Biota on the 2011 31 3:00 – 3:30 Japanese Tsunami Marine Debris Field 3:30 – 4:00 Edward Farley Chinook Salmon and the Marine Environment 32 4:00 – 4:30 Judith Connor Technologies for Ocean Studies 33 EVENING POSTER
    [Show full text]
  • Fisheries Rehabilitation and Enhancement in Bristol Bay-A
    FISHERIES REHABILITATION AND ENHANCEMENT IN BRISTOL BAY A COMPLETION REPORT BY Melinda L. Rowse and W. Michael Kaill Number 18 Report No./BB009 FISHERIES REHABILITATION AND ENHANCEMENT IN BRISTOL BAY A COMPLETION REPORT BY Melinda L. Rowse and W. Michael Kaill Number 18 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Fisheries Rehabilitation, Enhancement & Development Don W. Collinsworth Commissioner Stanley A. Moberly Di rector P.O. BOX 3-2000 Juneau, Alaska 99802 November 1983 TABLE OF CQNTENTS Section Page Abstract ........................................................ 1 Introduction .................................................... 2 Area Assessment ................................................. 2 Description of the Fishery ................................. 2 Japanese High Seas Fishery ................................. 4 History of Sockeye Salmon Rehabilitation in Bristol Bay ......... 7 Lake Fertilization ......................................... 9 Hatchery Evaluation ........................................ 12 Predator/Competitor Studies ................................ 12 Beluga Whale Predation ................................ 12 Stickleback Competition ............................... 13 Arctic Char Predation ................................. 14 Goals of F.R.E.D. Division in Bristol Bay ....................... 1.8 Report on F.R.E.D. Division Projects ............................ 19 Lake Nunavaugaluk Sockeye Salmon Smolt Studies ............. 19 Methods and Materials ................................. 19 Results ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of ALASKA Walter J. Hickel - Governor
    STATE OF ALASKA Walter J. Hickel - Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Thomas E. Kelly - Commissioner DIVISION OF MINES AND MINERALS James A. Williams - Director GEOCHEMICAL REPORT NO. 17 A Geochemical Investigation of the Wood River-Tikchik Lakes Area Southwestern A1 as ka BY Gilbert R. Eakins Col 1ege , A1 as ka May 1968 CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT 1 INTRODUCTION Location and accessibi 1 i ty Climate and vegetation History GENERAL GEOLOGY Previous work Physiography Stratigraphy Structure Mineralization Field observations GEOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATIONS Sampl ing procedure Sample analyses and evaluation Field tests Laboratory analyses Copper Zinc Lead Molybdenum Mercury DISCUSSION OF MERCURY SAMPLING Marsh Mountain Southeast end of Lake Aleknagi k Northwest part of Lake A1 eknagi k Little Togiak Lake, south side Other anomalous mercury samples SUGGESTIONS FOR PROSPECTING REFERENCES ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Location map showing mercury mines and prospects 3 2. Geochemical sample locations in the Red Top mine area 9 3. Granite intrusion at the west end of Silver Horn 14 4. Contorted carbonate bed on the south side of Golden Horn 14 5. Copper assay distribution graph 20 6. Zinc Assay distribution graph 21 7. Lead and molybdenum assay distribution graphs 22 8. Mercury assay distribution graph 23 9. Map, Geochemical Sample locations, Wood River-Ti kchick In pocket Lakes area, southwestern A1 aska 10. Map, Geochemical mercury anomalies, Wood River-Tikchick In pocket Lakes area, southwestern Alaska Table I. Generalized stratigraphic sequence of rocks in the Lower Kuskokwim-Bristol Bay region, A1 aska Table 11. Analyses for copper, lead, zinc, molybdenum, mercury and field tests. A GEOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE WOOD RIVER-TIKCHIK LAKES AREA SOUTHWESTERN ALASKA By Gilbert R.
    [Show full text]
  • Refashioning Production in Bristol Bay, Alaska by Karen E. Hébert A
    Wild Dreams: Refashioning Production in Bristol Bay, Alaska by Karen E. Hébert A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology) in the University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Fernando Coronil, Chair Associate Professor Arun Agrawal Associate Professor Stuart A. Kirsch Associate Professor Barbra A. Meek © Karen E. Hébert 2008 Acknowledgments At a cocktail party after an academic conference not long ago, I found myself in conversation with another anthropologist who had attended my paper presentation earlier that day. He told me that he had been fascinated to learn that something as “mundane” as salmon could be linked to so many important sociocultural processes. Mundane? My head spun with confusion as I tried to reciprocate chatty pleasantries. How could anyone conceive of salmon as “mundane”? I was so confused by the mere suggestion that any chance of probing his comment further passed me by. As I drifted away from the conversation, it occurred to me that a great many people probably deem salmon as mundane as any other food product, even if they may consider Alaskan salmon fishing a bit more exotic. At that moment, I realized that I was the one who carried with me a particularly pronounced sense of salmon’s significance—one that I shared with, and no doubt learned from, the people with whom I conducted research. The cocktail-party exchange made clear to me how much I had thoroughly adopted some of the very assumptions I had set out simply to study. It also made me smile, because it revealed how successful those I got to know during my fieldwork had been in transforming me from an observer into something more of a participant.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Science Symposium GULF of ALASKA MONDAY AFTERNOON, JANUARY 18, 2010 DENIS WIESENBURG, SCHOOL of FISHERIES and OCEAN SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY of ALASKA FAIRBANKS
    AlaskaMarine Science Symposium GULF OF ALASKA MONDAY AFTERNOON, JANUARY 18, 2010 DENIS WIESENBURG, SCHOOL OF FISHERIES AND OCEAN SCIENCES, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS Speaker Page Carl Schoch KEYNOTE: Prince William Sound Field Experiment 1 CLIMATE AND OCEANOGRAPHY Measuring the pulse of the Gulf of Alaska: oceanographic observations Russell R Hopcroft along Seward Line, 1997‐2009 2 Perspectives on a decade of change in the Alaska Gyre: a comparison Sonia Batten of three Northeast Pacific zooplankton time series 2 ECOSYSTEM PERSPECTIVES On the development of a 3‐tier nested estuarine classification for David M. Albert Southeast Alaska 3 Biodegradability of Lingering Oil 19 Years After the Exxon Valdez Oil Albert D. Venosa 3 Spill Modeling the Distribution of Lingering Subsurface Oil from the Exxon Jacqueline Michel Valdez Oil Spill 4 LOWER TROPHIC LEVELS Gulf of Alaska shelf ecosystem: model studies of the effects of Kenneth O. Coyle circulation and iron concentration on plankton production 5 Megan Murphy Oceanographic effects on larval transport of brachyuran crab in 5 Student Presentation Kachemak Bay, AK Potential for Razor Clam Restoration in Orca Inlet, Alaska ‐ Thoughts on Dennis C. Lees the Viability of Pre‐historic and Recent Fisheries, and the Nature of 6 Razor Clam Habitats and Associated Infaunal Assemblages FISH AND FISH HABITAT Jodi L Pirtle Habitat‐mediated survival and predator‐prey interactions of early 7 Student Presentation juvenile red king crab (Paralithodes camtschaticus) Ginny L Eckert King Crab Aquaculture and
    [Show full text]
  • BSIERP B69 Appendix
    Technical Paper No. 371 Subsistence Harvests and Uses in Three Bering Sea Communities, 2008: Akutan, Emmonak, and Togiak by James A. Fall, Caroline L. Brown, Nicole M. Braem, Lisa Hutchinson-Scarbrough, David Koster, Theodore M. Krieg, and Andrew R. Brenner December 2012 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Subsistence Symbols and Abbreviations The following symbols and abbreviations, and others approved for the Système International d'Unités (SI), are used without definition in the reports by the Division of Subsistence. All others, including deviations from definitions listed below, are noted in the text at first mention, as well as in the titles or footnotes of tables, and in figure or figure captions. Weights and measures (metric) General Mathematics, statistics centimeter cm Alaska Administrative Code AAC all standard mathematical signs, symbols deciliter dL all commonly-accepted and abbreviations gram g abbreviations e.g., alternate hypothesis HA hectare ha Mr., Mrs., base of natural logarithm e kilogram kg AM, PM, etc. catch per unit effort CPUE kilometer km all commonly-accepted coefficient of variation CV liter L professional titles e.g., Dr., Ph.D., common test statistics (F, t, 2, etc.) meter m R.N., etc. confidence interval CI milliliter mL at @ correlation coefficient (multiple) R millimeter mm compass directions: correlation coefficient (simple) r east E covariance cov Weights and measures (English) north N degree (angular ) ° cubic feet per second ft3/s south S degrees of freedom df foot ft west W expected value E gallon gal copyright greater than > inch in corporate suffixes: greater than or equal to mile mi Company Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Monitoring and Status of the Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Herd
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Population Monitoring and Status of the Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Herd, 1988-2012 Andy R. Aderman Togiak National Wildlife Refuge Dillingham, Alaska August 2013 Citation: Aderman, A. R. 2013. Population monitoring and status of the Nushagak Peninsula caribou herd, 1988-2012. Togiak National Wildlife Refuge, Dillingham, Alaska. 30 pp. Keywords: caribou, Rangifer tarandus, Togiak National Wildlife Refuge, southwestern Alaska, calf production, recruitment, survival, population estimate, subsistence harvest, management implications Disclaimer: The use of trade names of commercial products in this report does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the federal government. Population Monitoring and Status of the Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Herd, 1988-2012 Andy R. Aderman1 ABSTRACT In February 1988, 146 caribou were reintroduced to the Nushagak Peninsula. From 1988 to 2013, radio collars were deployed on female caribou and monitored monthly. High calf recruitment and adult female survival allowed the population to grow rapidly (r = 0.226), peaking at 1,399 caribou in 1997. Population density on the Nushagak Peninsula reached approximately 1.2 caribou per km2 in 1997 and 1998. During the next decade, calf recruitment and adult female survival decreased and the population declined (r = -0.105) to 546 caribou in 2006. The population remained at about 550 caribou until 2009 and then increased to 902 by 2012. Subsistence hunting removed from 0-12.3% of the population annually from 1995-2012. Decreased nutrition and other factors likely caused an unstable age distribution and subsequent population decline after the peak in 1997. Dispersal, disease, unreported harvest and predation implications for caribou populations are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Layers of Meaning in Lake Clark National Park and Preserve
    Subsistence, Tourism, and Research: Layers of Meaning in Lake Clark National Park and Preserve Karen Gaul Abstract—Overlapping designations of park, preserve, and wil- This creation story has as its locus not some mythical derness are assigned to Lake Clark National Park and Preserve in place or unearthly realm, but features the very real and south-central Alaska. The Park was established in 1980 as a result spectacular Telaquana Mountain (fig. 1) in what is now the of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). wilderness area of Lake Clark National Park and Preserve. Consisting of over four million acres, it includes homelands and From Telaquana, according to this Dena’ina story, all the hunting and fishing grounds for the inland Dena’ina, a northern animals of the Earth tumbled out. This story represents Athabaskan-speaking people, who still engage in subsistence prac- just one set of meanings read into the complex and beauti- tices within the park. Dena’ina understandings of the environment ful landscapes that now make up Lake Clark National Park include multiple spiritual dimensions. The Park and Preserve are and Preserve. also used by sport fishers and hunters, backpackers, rafters, and Cultural resource specialists in the National Park Service other park visitors who are in search of a variety of wilderness (NPS) have been increasingly attentive to the cultural his- experiences. National Park Service researchers conduct a range of tory that is part of every national park, no matter how wild research projects that contribute to efforts to monitor and protect or remote. In this discussion, I consider the cultural use cultural and natural resources in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Clark Fact Sheet
    National Park Service Lake Clark U.S. Department of the Interior Lake Clark National Park & Preserve www.nps.gov/lacl Fact Sheet Purpose Lake Clark was established to protect a region of dynamic geologic and ecological processes that create scenic mountain landscapes, unaltered watersheds supporting Bristol Bay red salmon, and habitats for wilderness dependent populations of fish & wildlife, vital to 10,000 years of human history. Established December 1, 1978 ....................... Designated as a National Monument by President Carter December 2, 1980 ....................... Designated as a National Park and Preserve and enlarged through the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. Size Total ............................................. 4,030,006 acres or ~ 6,297 square miles National Park ............................... 2,619,713 acres or ~ 4,093 square miles National Preserve ....................... 1,410,293 acres or ~ 2,204 square miles For comparison, the state of Hawaii is 4.11 million acres or 6,423 square miles. Rhode Island and Connecticut combined are only 3.77 million acres or 5,890 square miles. Additional 2.61 million acres ......................... National Wilderness Preservation System Designations 4 .................................................... National Register of Historic Places Dr. Elmer Bly House listed in 2006 Dick Proenneke Site listed in 2007 Libby’s No. 23 Bristol Bay Double-Ender listed in 2013 Wassillie Trefon Dena’ina Fish Cache listed in 2013 3 .................................................... National Wild Rivers Chilikadrotna River - 11 miles listed in 1980 Mulchatna River - 24 miles listed in 1980 Tlikakila River - 51 miles listed in 1980 2 .................................................... National Natural Landmarks Redoubt Volcano listed in 1976 Iliamna Volcano listed in 1976 1 .................................................... National Historic Landmark Kijik Archeological District listed in 1994 Employment NPS Permanent Employees ....
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Subsistence Board Proceedings, April 13, 1994
    STAFF ANALYSIS TEMPORARY SPECIAL ACTION WSA16-02 ISSUES Temporary Special Action Request WSA16-02, submitted by the Togiak National Wildlife Refuge (NWR) and the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G), requests that Federal public lands on the Nushagak Peninsula be opened to the harvest of caribou by all Alaska residents when the population is above 900 caribou. DISCUSSION The Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Herd (NPCH) is a growing population that is currently well above the population objectives outlined in the Nushagak Peninsula Caribou Management Plan. In recent years, harvest has been below average, owing largely to poor winter travel conditions that prevented hunters from accessing caribou. The proponents are concerned that if the population continues to grow, severe range degradation could occur, causing the herd to move from the Peninsula to areas where favorable forage conditions exist. Expanding the opportunity to harvest caribou on the Nushagak Peninsula to all Alaska residents could be helpful in reducing the population to desired levels and preventing overuse of the range. The proponents believe that increased harvest in the near term will benefit subsistence users in the long term by stabilizing the population, thereby providing a consistent opportunity to harvest caribou on the Nushagak Peninsula. This request was submitted with a letter of support from Choggiung Ltd., an Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) village corporation and land owner on the Nushagak Peninsula (Appendix 1). The applicable Federal regulations are found in 36 CFR 242.19(b) and 50 CFR 100.19(b) (Temporary Special Actions) and state that: …After adequate notice and public hearing, the Board may temporarily close or open public lands for the taking of fish and wildlife for subsistence uses, or modify the requirements for subsistence take, or close public lands for the taking of fish and wildlife for nonsubsistence uses, or restrict take for nonsubsistence uses.
    [Show full text]
  • Major Drainages of Bristol Bay
    BRISTOL BAY SALT AND FRESH WATER 12 Major Drainages of Bristol Bay k See the Northern ar Cl Alaska Sport Fish e Regulation Summary Lak Port Alsworth es ag in ra Iliamna D Wood River er age Togiak River iv rain Ungalikthluk Drainage R r D Drainage a ive River Drainage tn R Lake Iliamna a k h a lc h u ic M v / K k a g a Riv Dillingham gnak er Drain h Ala ag s e See the Southcentral u Alaska Sport Fish N Regulation Summary Cape Newenham King Salmon Naknek Rive r Dra B inag ris e to l Ege Ba gik y Ri S ver alt D wa ra te in rs a ge Cape Menshikof U ga sh ik R i Dr ve ain r ag Alaska Peninsula & e Kodiak Island Aleutian Islands See pages 24 - 28 Miles See pages 22 - 23 0 25 50 ARCTIC CHAR AND DOLLY VARDEN LINGCOD General Regulations - Bristol Bay • Season: June 8–October 31 . • No limit . • 3 per day, 3 in possession . ROCKFISH Inclusive waters: All fresh waters draining into Bristol Bay between Cape Menshikof and Cape Newenham, and • Season: November 1–June 7 . • No limit . all salt waters east of a line from Cape Newenham to • 10 per day, 10 in possession. KING CRAB Cape Menshikof . RAINBOW TROUT • Season: June 1–January 31 . The fishing season for all species is open year-round • Season: June 8–October 31 . • Males only: unless otherwise noted below. • 2 per day, 2 in possession, only 1 of which may • 6½ inches or more: 6 per day, 6 in possession.
    [Show full text]