DOCSLIB.ORG

The Canada Institute Advisory Board

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Canada Institute Advisory Board (left) Members of the Canada Institute hold a private briefing with the Canadian Minister of Foreign Affairs Stephane Dion; (center) Co-Chairs Doer and Jacobson enjoy the semi-annual Advisory Board meeting; (right) former Prime Minister Stephen Harper visits the Wilson Center. THE CANADA INSTITUTE ADVISORY BOARD (left) Premier of Quebec Philippe Couillard speaks on energy at a private breakfast; (center) Canada’s Ambassador to the United States David MacNaughton addresses the Canada Institute Advisory Board; (right) Canada Institute Director Laura Dawson meets with Canadian Minister of National Defence Harjit Sajjan. Founded in 2001, the Canada Institute is funded by private The only public policy sector donations and a small Congressional appropriation. The Institute works in close partnership with the Canadian Embassy in forum in the world Washington to promote awareness and understanding of Canada- U.S. issues, especially among U.S. legislators. The Canada Institute dedicated to the full Advisory Board Co-Chairs are Hon. David Jacobson, Hon. Gary Doer, spectrum of and Hugh MacKinnon. Canada- U.S. issues On issues ranging from trade and supply chains to security, borders, energy, health and the environment, the Institute builds We connect you with prominent people, fresh ideas, and sustains the dialogue on key Canada-U.S. concerns. Each year, and innovative solutions: the Institute hosts dozens of public seminars, holds numerous student and business group briefings, funds Canadian scholars and • People. Advisory board members have access scholarship, and produces research reports on important policy to world-class scholars and issue experts issues. offering unmatched insight to public policy challenges and opportunities. The Canada Institute is an important resource of the Wilson Center. • Ideas. The Canada Institute’s signature Established by the U.S. Congress, the Center provides a trusted programming, which emphasizes the non-partisan platform, producing actionable ideas that bridge the importance of non-partisan research, is gap between scholarship and policy. a highly regarded and credible source The Wilson Center is recognized as the #1 transdisciplinary of information on both domestic and research think tank in the world, #5 think tank in the U.S. and #9 international issues. think tank overall in the world.* • Policy. The Wilson Center’s deep ties with Washington help the Canada Institute connect with leading policymakers. * The Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program (TTCSP) at the University of Pennsylvania. 2015. Canada Institute Corporate Circle The Advisory Board consists of a Policy Circle and a Corporate Circle. Members of the Policy Circle include former ambassadors, premiers, and legislators. They are appointed for three-year, renewable terms and membership fees are waived in recognition of their contribution to the bilateral relationship. Members of the Corporate Circle represent leading North American enterprises. All new members must be approved by Board Co-Chairs. All fees are in U.S. dollars. Membership in the Canada Institute’s Corporate Circle provides access to a marketplace of ideas where we convene today’s brightest minds to discuss the most pressing challenges and opportunities facing the policy community. Corporate Benefits of Membership ($15,000) Personalized concierge service: dedicated primary point of contact at the Institute to help guide your engagement Interaction with world-class scholars, staff and issue experts on a wide range of Canada-U.S. issues Invitation to semi-annual Advisory Board meetings that bring together thought leaders to discuss important issues of the day Invitations transferrable within organization. Regular teleconferences on critical issues such as elections, trade, energy, the environment, and border issues Ability to help shape our agenda and define our focus issues for the year Corporate Benefits of Membership ($15,000) Visit support in Washington, D.C. including organized briefings Reserved priority seating at public events held at the Institute Updates on breaking news and announcements from the Institute about upcoming dignitary visits, keynote lectures and other programming Invitations to Canada Institute Woodrow Wilson Awards Dinners Increased regional engagement in your communities through custom programming in your hometown Why Join the Canada Institute Advisory Board? Membership on the Canada Institute Advisory Board ensures that your organization is an active participant in key Canada-U.S. issues. The Canada Institute is the only think tank in the world dedicated to the broad spectrum of bilateral policy areas. All Canada Institute programming and research is offered to the public free of charge. Contributions from advisory board members ensure that we can continue to support Canadian scholarship and promote key bilateral issues in the United States and Canada. Advisory Board Policy Circle Gov. James Premier Jean Amb. Raymond Amb. Gary Doer Amb. Paul Frazer Amb. Gordon Blanchard Charest Chrétien Giffin Amb. Allan Gotlieb Amb. David Amb. Michael Rep. William Amb. David Wilkins Amb. Michael Jacobson Kergin Owens Wilson Advisory Board Corporate Circle For more information, please contact: Laura Dawson, PhD Director, Canada Institute (202) 691-4082 [email protected].
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United Together Against Pallister's Cuts
    FALL 2019 MANITOBA FEDERATION OF LABOUR President Rebeck speaks at Labour Day rally at the Manitoba Legislature United together against Pallister’s cuts Sisters, brothers and friends, the labour movement had a busy summer, and after the snap provincial election we face another term of the Pallister 2019 MFL Health and government and its anti-union agenda. Safety Report Card ( P. 3) However, working families can also count on a stronger NDP opposition in the Manitoba Legislature to stand up for their interests, as the NDP gained six seats. Four more years of As we have done for the previous 3.5 years, Manitoba’s unions will continue Brian Pallister ( P. 4) to be a strong voice on behalf of working families against the Pallister government’s cuts and privatization moves. KEVIN REBECK As Labour Day fell during the provincial election campaign, unions and labour activists joined together for a march from the Winnipeg General Strike streetcar monument to the Manitoba Fight for a Fair Canada this election ( P. 6) Legislature, as well as community events in other communities throughout the province. On the steps of the Legislature, I was proud to join with other speakers like NDP leader Wab Kinew, and NDP candidate for Winnipeg Centre Leah Gazan to stress the need for a united labour movement to stand up and fight back against Conservative governments and their plans to hurt working families. On the municipal front, the Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1505 continues to stand up for its members in contract negotiations with the City of Winnipeg. AT.USW9074/DD.cope342 Cont’d on Page 2 Manitoba Federation of Labour // 303-275 Broadway, Winnipeg, MB R3C 4M6 // MFL.ca United together, cont’d 1 ATU 1505 members have been without a contract since January, and the union continues to focus on key issues for its members in negotiations, including better bus schedules, recovery time for transit drivers and mental health supports.
    [Show full text]
  • The NDP's Approach to Constitutional Issues Has Not Been Electorally
    Constitutional Confusion on the Left: The NDP’s Position in Canada’s Constitutional Debates Murray Cooke [email protected] First Draft: Please do not cite without permission. Comments welcome. Paper prepared for the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Political Science Association, June 2004, Winnipeg The federal New Democratic Party experienced a dramatic electoral decline in the 1990s from which it has not yet recovered. Along with difficulties managing provincial economies, the NDP was wounded by Canada’s constitutional debates. The NDP has historically struggled to present a distinctive social democratic approach to Canada’s constitution. Like its forerunner, the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF), the NDP has supported a liberal, (English-Canadian) nation-building approach that fits comfortably within the mainstream of Canadian political thought. At the same time, the party has prioritized economic and social polices rather than seriously addressing issues such as the deepening of democracy or the recognition of national or regional identities. Travelling without a roadmap, the constitutional debates of the 80s and 90s proved to be a veritable minefield for the NDP. Through three rounds of mega- constitutional debate (1980-82, 1987-1990, 1991-1992), the federal party leadership supported the constitutional priorities of the federal government of the day, only to be torn by disagreements from within. This paper will argue that the NDP’s division, lack of direction and confusion over constitution issues can be traced back to longstanding weaknesses in the party’s social democratic theory and strategy. First of all, the CCF- NDP embraced rather than challenged the parameters and institutions of liberal democracy.
    [Show full text]
  • Selecting Selinger: the 2009 Leadership Race and the Future of NDP Conventions in Manitoba∗
    Selecting Selinger: The 2009 Leadership Race and the Future of NDP Conventions in Manitoba∗ Jared J. Wesley, University of Manitoba [email protected] Paper for Presentation at The Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association Concordia University, Montreal June 2010 Abstract In a delegated convention held in October, 2009, the Manitoba New Democratic Party (NDP) selected former Finance Minister Greg Selinger to replace Canada's longest-serving and most popular premier, Gary Doer. Official appeals filed by the victor’s chief rival, Steve Ashton, and persistent criticism of the process in the media raised significant concerns over the method by which the new premier was selected. These complaints proved a fleeting fixation of the media, and have not harmed the NDP’s popularity or affected the smooth transition of the premiership from Doer to Selinger. Yet, questions persist as to whether the 2009 leadership race marked the last delegated convention in the history of the Manitoba New Democratic Party. This paper examines the 2009 leadership race in the context of contests past, analyzing the list of criticisms directed at the process. Grounding its findings in the comments of delegates to the 2009 Convention, it concludes with a series of probable choices for the party, as it begins the process of considering reforms to its leadership selection process. Leading contenders for adoption include a pure one-member, one-vote system and a modified version similar to that of the federal NDP. ∗ Funding for the 2009 Manitoba NDP Convention Study was provided by the Faculty of Arts, Duff Roblin Professorship, and Department of Political Studies at the University of Manitoba, and the Canada Research Chair in Indigenous Politics and Governance.
    [Show full text]
  • Government Affairs and Public Policy Group
    dentons.com Government Affairs and Public Policy Strategic advice locally, across Canada and around the globe. Overview The Dentons Government Affairs and Public Policy group in Canada comprises a world-class team of former politicians, policy leaders and leading recognized lawyers who assist clients with their policy, business, legislative, legal, political and regulatory needs at the local, provincial, national and international levels to strategically address complex issues and mitigate risk. We take advantage of Dentons' full service legal platform to achieve client goals in an increasingly complex policy and regulatory landscape. The group offers services to clients across all of our six Canadian offices, in collaboration with our leading public policy practice in the US and Dentons professionals around the globe. dentons.com 3 Who we are Experienced team • David Hancock, QC, former This group also draws on the The Government Affairs and Public Premier of Alberta, Deputy Premier experienced Dentons US Public Policy group has capability that is and Minister of many different Policy and Regulation practice, without peer in Canada. Alberta Government departments whose members include over 240 (Justice and Attorney General, legal and public policy advisors, Our team includes: Solicitor General, Education, including former ambassadors, senior Advanced Education and party officials, members of the US • The Right Honourable Jean Technology, and Human Services). Congress, top aides to US presidents, Chrétien, PC, CC, OM, QC, governors and senators, including Canada’s 20th Prime Minister • The Honourable James Moore, Newt Gingrich, former US presidential (1993-2003). First elected in 1963, PC, former Canadian Minister of candidate and former Speaker of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Was Stephen Harper Really Tough on Crime? a Systems and Symbolic Action Analysis
    Was Stephen Harper Really Tough on Crime? A Systems and Symbolic Action Analysis A thesis submitted to The College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfilment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the Department of Sociology University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon By Mark Jacob Stobbe ©Mark Jacob Stobbe, September 2018. All rights reserved. PERMISSION TO USE In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirement for a postgraduate degree from the University of Saskatchewan, I agree that the libraries of this University may make it freely available for inspection. I further agree that permission for copying of this thesis in any manner, in whole or part, for scholarly purposes, may be granted by the professor or professors who supervised my thesis work or, in their absence, by the Head of the Department or the Dean of the College in which my thesis was done. It is understood that any copying, publication or use of this thesis or parts thereof for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. It is also understood that due recognition shall be given to me and the University of Saskatchewan in any scholarly use which may be made of any material in my thesis. Request for permission to copy or use of whole or part of this thesis may be addressed to: Department of Sociology University of Saskatchewan 1019 - 9 Campus Drive Saskatoon, SK Canada S7N 5A5 OR College of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies University of Saskatchewan Room 116 Thorvaldson Building, 110 Science Place Saskatoon SK Canada S7N 5C9 i ABSTRACT In 2006, the Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents RE-INVENTING THE LEFT IN CANADA Introduction........................................................................................................ 31 A Party in Crisis?..................................................................................................33 The Informed Viewer ..........................................................................................34 Canadian Social Democratic Movement Overview ..............................................35 Fortune and Men’s Eyes ...................................................................................... 39 Discussion, Research, and Essay Questions ..........................................................43 RE-INVENTING THE LEFT IN CANADA Introduction After a disappointing showing in the Novem- deficits, there is increased public support for ber 2000 federal election, its third since a halt to further cuts to spending in educa- 1993, the federal New Democratic Party tion, health, and social programs, and a faces serious challenges as it contemplates its reinvestment of tax revenues into these vital political future. Under the leadership of areas. Alexa McDonough, the NDP’s campaign Such trends should offer a promising focused directly on what all the opinion polls environment for the NDP and its social indicated was the primary concern of Cana- reform message, yet in three successive dians: the preservation of the country’s federal elections the party has been relegated publicly funded health-care system. Despite to an increasingly marginal position in the NDP’s often-repeated claims that as the Canadian federal politics. In fact, during the party responsible for introducing medicare in last campaign most media coverage was Canada it could best be counted on to defend devoted to what were viewed as the only two the system from further cuts, only eight per parties that could realistically claim to be cent those who voted in the election gave it serious contenders for power—the Liberals their support. The NDP’s total representation and the Canadian Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Manitoba's Progressive Conservative Party
    Manitoba’s Progressive Conservative Party: A “Great Renewal” or Continued Disarray? Paper presented to the Roblin Professorship Conference - Manitoba Politics, Government and Policy into the 21st Century November 2008 Draft Working Paper – Please do no cite without permission from the author Kelly L. Saunders, Ph.D. Department of Political Science Brandon University Brandon, MB [email protected] I. Introduction At the annual general meeting of the Manitoba Progressive Conservative Party held last spring, leader Hugh McFadyen acknowledged that while it had had some disappointing setbacks, the Party was nonetheless on the verge of a “great renewal”. In light of the Party’s diminishing fortunes over the past decade, and most recently in the May 2007 election when it suffered its worst electoral showing since 1953, McFadyen’s attempts to instill hope in his Party’s faithful is understandable. Whether the Party is simply experiencing the ebb and flow natural to all political organizations, or is suffering from a deeper, more serious malaise, however, remains disputable. What is clear is that the Conservatives, as they enter the 21st century, are at a turning point in their history. The extent to which it is able to overcome its current woes, and be viewed as a credible and realistic alternative to the governing New Democrats by a wider proportion of Manitobans, is the fundamental question before the Party today. It is also the focus of this paper. In addressing the varied challenges confronting the P.C. Party as it enters the new millennium, the paper will draw on interviews with party insiders as well as a variety of primary and secondary documents1.
    [Show full text]
  • Manitoba and Saskatchewan Elections: Broken Electoral Destinies?
    The 2007 Manitoba and Saskatchewan elections: Broken Electoral Destinies? Florence Cartigny Doctoral Candidate – University of Bordeaux 3, France DRAFT VERSION Abstract: Both Saskatchewan and Manitoba have traditionally been seen as social democratic provinces. But, over the past decades, there has been an increasing convergence in policy solutions and as a consequence the platforms of political parties have become more and more similar. What is the impact of this convergence on the 2007 provincial election in Saskatchewan and in Manitoba? In November 2007, the Saskatchewan NDP lost the election, thus ending a 16-year NDP reign while in May 2007, the Manitoba NDP in power for 7 years was re-elected. The Saskatchewan Party won 38 seats out of 58 (65%), thus gaining 8 seats. In Manitoba, the NDP took 36 of 57 seats (63%). And yet, many commonalities appear in the policy platforms of those political parties. In Manitoba, the NDP focused on universal health care, education, tax cuts, public safety, money for highways and on reducing pollution. But in Saskatchewan promises were very similar for the two rivals. Indeed, both the NDP and the Saskatchewan Party made promises on improved health care and tuition breaks for post- secondary students, on recruiting medical professionals and on reducing greenhouse gases. But those common points are not necessarily social democratic ideals. Does this shift in electoral preferences signal the end of a common social democratic destiny between Manitoba and Saskatchewan? Do those election results signal an ideological continuum in Manitoba and a rupture in Saskatchewan? To answer those questions, policy platforms and debates will be analyzed in depth.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring the Fiscal Performance of Canada's Premiers
    Studies in Budget & Tax Policy October 2010 Measuring the Fiscal Performance of Canada’s Premiers by Charles Lammam, Milagros Palacios, Amela Karabegović, and Niels Veldhuis Studies in Budget and Tax Policy October 2010 Measuring the Fiscal Performance of Canada’s Premiers by Charles Lammam, Milagros Palacios, Amela Karabegović, and Niels Veldhuis www.fraserinstitute.org / Fraser Institute Fraser Institute / www.fraserinstitute.org Contents Executive summary / 1 Introduction / 7 Why fiscal performance matters / 8 How performance is measured / 15 Fiscal performance of Canada’s premiers / 21 Conclusion / 32 Province-by-province analysis / 33 Appendix 1 Methodology / 48 Appendix 2 Corporate Capital Tax / 53 References / 54 About the authors / 65 Acknowledgments / 67 Publishing information / 68 Supporting the Fraser Institute / 69 About the Fraser Institute / 70 Editorial Advisory Board / 71 www.fraserinstitute.org / Fraser Institute Fraser Institute / www.fraserinstitute.org Measuring the Fiscal Performance of Canada’s Premiers / 1 Executive summary In a world of increasing competitiveness, sound fiscal policy is a critical determinant of long-term economic success. Sound fiscal policy requires that governments balance their financial affairs and avoid imposing a tax burden so heavy that it becomes a disincentive for people to work hard, save, invest, and be entrepreneurial, while still ensuring adequate and efficient public services. So, our political leaders should prioritize, rather than sim- ply increase, government resources; ensure balanced budgets; and focus on improving incentives for individuals and businesses to engage in productive economic activity. Since there is currently no objective measure of how provincial pre- miers are performing in the area of fiscal policy, it is difficult for Canadians to hold the premiers accountable for the relative performance of their fiscal policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme Toronto
    In collaboration with PRESENTS GLOBAL CITIES IN CHALLENGING TIMES HOW CAN GLOBAL CITIES INVEST IN TOMORROW’S PROSPERITY? PROGRAM December 8 and 9, 2008 The Westin Harbour Castle Hotel, Toronto Sponsors Platiniumi Goldi Silveri Media partnersi Event produced by: 2 Message from the Founding Chairman of the Toronto Forum for Global Cities, Gil Rémillard Global cities are constantly striving to remain competitive. This means being able to attract world-class innovators, develop state-of-the-art infrastructure and invest in efficient energy projects and facilities. In the context of a world economic downturn, financing these projects will be a major challenge. Can we foresee the economic slowdown as an opportunity rather than a threat? What are the latest strategies for financing green transportation and sustainable energy? Can we forecast a new and different economic landscape that integrates the roles of the business community, the public sector and consumers around the world? How can global cities keep investing in tomorrow’s prosperity? Regardless of the economic situation, investing in our cities’ competitiveness will remain a priority; we cannot allow uncertainty to put strategic investments on hold. In these times of difficulty, the various levels of government play a major role in sustaining the country through massive investment in infrastructure programs. I would like to express my gratitude to the Ontario Government, especially the Honourable Dalton McGuinty who has graciously accepted our invitation. My sincere thanks are also offered to David Miller and the City of Toronto who have supported this venture since the beginning. Thanks to our sponsors and partners, this year will bring us several steps closer to having this unique event recognized as one of the most important independent economic forums in the Americas.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on the Social Democratic Tradition
    Reflections on the Social Democratic Tradition A discussion paper authored by Andrew Jackson * | March, 2017 *Andrew Jackson is Senior Policy Advisor to the Broadbent Institute. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary ..........................................................3 2.0 What is Social Democracy? . 6 3.0 Social Democracy from the Gilded Age to the Golden Age . 13 4.0 Social Democracy from the Golden Age to the Great Recession . 21 5.0 Conclusion: Contemporary Prospects for Social Democracy .......... 36 6.0 Acknowledgements ........................................................ 41 7.0 Further Reading ........................................................... 42 2 | REFLECTIONS ON THE SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC TRADITION 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The purpose of this paper is to provide a political history, overview and critical evaluation of the social democratic tradition in Western politics with some reference to the Canadian experience. It serves as a starting point for the Broadbent Institute’s new initiative exploring social democratic renewal in Canada, a project that will feature essays from a wide range of left perspectives on the future of social democracy in this critical moment of upheaval, inequality and erosion in democracies around the globe. The term social democracy designates both a social and political movement and a distinctive political theory that developed in opposition to liberal capitalism in the second half of the nineteenth century. As used here, the term social democracy means the full extension of democratic principles to both the social and economic sphere and overlaps closely with the concept of democratic socialism, which denotes building a different kind of economy. Social democracy is about more than capitalism plus a welfare state, and very much remains a goal rather than a reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognize Our Donors
    THANK YOU! Recognizing your Landmark contribution to nature Nature Conservancy of Canada Landmark Campaign Recognition List 1 Big Trout Bay, Ontario Dear Friends, NATIONAL CAMPAIGN CABINET Co-chairs As co-chairs of the Nature Conservancy of Canada’s Harold (Hal) Kvisle (NCC’s) Landmark Campaign, we watched with Corporate Director; pride and awe as more than 110,000 Canadians took Former CEO, TransCanada and Talisman Energy conservation into their own hands, giving generously Brian Tobin to save the lands and waters that sustain us all. Vice-Chair, BMO Financial Group Cabinet Members You were one of those donors, and we’re so Shelley Ambrose very grateful. Hal Kvisle Former Publisher & Executive Director, The Walrus Thanks to you, we have not only achieved, Gary Doer but surpassed our campaign goal of raising Corporate Director; $750 million for conservation in Canada! Former Canadian Ambassador to the U.S. L. David Dubé Together, we have delivered a historic and President & CEO, Concorde Group Corp. lasting impact for nature that benefits not only us as Canadians, but the world. By supporting Darren Entwistle Brian Tobin NCC, you expanded our network of protected President & CEO, TELUS areas, conserving an additional 11.5 million hectares James D. Irving (28 million acres) — more than one-and-a-half times the size of New Brunswick. You helped Co-CEO, J.D. Irving Ltd. safeguard habitat for hundreds of species and mitigate the effects of climate change by Patrick Pichette protecting the forests, wetlands and grasslands that act as carbon sinks. And you ensured General Partner, Inovia Capital natural areas remain accessible to Canadians, benefitting us both physically and mentally.
    [Show full text]