DOCSLIB.ORG

Master's Thesis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Master's Thesis MASTER'S THESIS Health Monitoring of Re-entry Vehicles Michael McWinnie Master of Science Space Engineering - Space Master Luleå University of Technology Department of Computer Science, Electrical and Space Engineering Health Monitoring of Re-entry Vehicles Michael McWhinnie Supervisor: Dr. Peter Roberts School of Engineering Cranfield University A thesis submitted for the degree of: MSc Astronautics and Space Engineering 2011 August c Cranfield University, 2011. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without the written permission of the copyright holder. Abstract The inevitable return of space hardware from low earth orbit via targeted re-entries or naturally decaying orbits, creates a risk to human casualty and property damage. Fragmentation models that are used to assess this risk, however, contain a large degree of uncertainty and lack experimental data for calibration. A recently proven method for a↵ordably recording this crit- ical re-entry data is the use of an automated, compact re-entry health mon- itoring system passively attached to a host spacecraft. The device records a variety of data during the breakup, only to release and transmit its data volume to a commercial satellite constellation for retrieval and analysis. Using the Automated Transfer Vehicle re-entry scenario, this study explores the limitations of such a concept by identifying and analysing system and scenario-related constraints. Although realisable, two major findings were made evident. First, the transmittable data volume, though sufficient in this scenario, is likely to be quickly exceeded in more data-intensive scenarios. Second, power consumption on a passive device is a major constraint for longer duration missions. The data recorded is expected to provide invaluable insights leading to model calibration and spacecraft ‘design-for-demise’ techniques. Given the necessity to mitigate casualty risk and comply with agency guidelines, the aim here is to relieve spacecraft operators of manoeuvring costs and sub- sequent payload reductions. There is also potential to use the device as a ‘black-box’ for reusable re-entry vehicles of the future. Such a device could reduce developmental costs and risk to manned-spaceflight. Acknowledgements To all who have directly or indirectly assisted in the creation of this work: My supervisor Dr. Peter Roberts for his insights and guidance, everyone in Meeting Group 1 for ideas transpired through discussion, SpaceMasters past and present, Tweefontein for their understanding and hospitality, Emily for her love and support, and of course, my family. Thank you. ii Contents List of Figures v List of Tables vii Notation ix Acronyms xi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Thespacedebrisproblem .......................... 1 1.2 The re-entry health monitoring problem . 2 1.3 Statement of purpose . 3 1.4 Overviewofthestudy ............................ 4 2 Background and Context 5 2.1 Debrishazard................................. 5 2.2 Design-for-demise............................... 7 2.3 Fragmentation models . 8 2.3.1 Object-orientedcodes . 8 2.3.1.1 DAS . 8 2.3.1.2 ORSAT . 9 2.3.1.3 SESAM . 10 2.3.2 Spacecraft-oriented codes . 10 2.3.2.1 SCARAB . 10 2.4 Reentry observation campaigns . 12 2.5 The Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) . 12 2.6 TheRe-entryBreakupRecorder(REBR) . 13 iii CONTENTS 2.6.1 Overview ............................... 14 2.6.2 Mission profile . 15 2.6.3 Flight history . 15 3 Research Design 17 3.1 Researchsummary .............................. 17 3.2 Scopeofstudy ................................ 18 4 Mission Concept 21 4.1 Missionobjectives .............................. 21 4.2 MissionConcept ............................... 22 4.2.1 Physical properties . 22 4.2.2 Payload . 22 4.2.3 On-orbit phase . 23 4.2.4 Atmospheric entry phase . 23 4.2.5 Data recovery phase . 24 5SystemRequirements 27 5.1 Systempassivity ............................... 27 5.2 Aerothermalrequirements . 29 5.3 Dynamicrequirements ............................ 30 5.4 Fragmentation requirements . 31 5.5 Communicationrequirements . 32 5.6 Summary ................................... 33 6 Trajectory Modelling 35 6.1 Trajectory model rationale . 35 6.2 Planartrajectorymodel ........................... 36 6.2.1 Formulation of dynamic model and assumptions . 36 6.2.2 Formulation of atmospheric model and assumptions . 40 6.2.3 Initial conditions . 40 6.2.4 Trajectoryresults........................... 42 6.2.5 Discussion............................... 46 6.2.5.1 Maximum transmittable data volume . 46 6.2.5.2 Aeroshell design . 48 iv CONTENTS 6.2.5.3 Thermal protection system . 49 7 Payload 51 7.1 Attitudedetermination. 51 7.1.1 Attitude rates of change . 52 7.1.2 Integration technique . 54 7.2 Temperaturemeasurement. 55 7.2.1 Device housing and thermocouple type . 56 7.2.2 Thermocouple amplifiers . 57 7.3 Heat flux measurement . 57 7.3.1 The lumped system approach to heat transfer . 58 7.3.2 Model Validation . 60 7.3.2.1 Error sources and assumptions . 61 7.3.2.2 Calculated heat flux output for the RAFLEX tempera- tureprofile ......................... 62 7.3.3 Discussion............................... 63 7.3.4 Applicability to the ATV re-entry environment . 65 7.3.5 Conclusion . 66 7.4 Pressuresensor ................................ 66 7.5 Data transceiver and Antenna . 67 7.6 Data generation and transmission . 69 7.6.1 Sampling rate lower-bound . 69 7.6.2 Sampling rate upper-bound . 70 7.6.3 Estimated data volume generated . 70 7.7 Micro-controller and data storage . 71 8 Power 73 8.1 Payload power consumptions . 73 8.2 Payload activation scheduling . 74 8.2.1 Low-power payload schedule . 77 8.2.2 Medium-power payload schedule . 77 8.2.3 High-power payload schedule . 77 8.3 Batteryselectionandsizing . 78 8.4 Discussion................................... 79 v CONTENTS 9 Mass 81 9.1 Payload mass . 81 9.2 Thermal protection system mass . 81 9.3 Housing mass . 82 10 Conclusion 85 10.1 Thesiscontribution.............................. 85 10.2 Looking forward . 87 10.3Futurework.................................. 88 10.4 Final thoughts . 89 References 91 A Additional Trajectory Results 95 B Ariane-5 Performance Envelope 101 vi List of Figures 2.1 Impact of de-orbit timeframe mitigation strategies on manned-mission debris impact flux for objects 1cm (1). 6 ≥ 2.2 Di↵ering heat loads for a full re-entry, and a re-entry exposure starting at a generic altitude (2). 9 2.3 A typical spacecraft model generated in SCARAB (2). 11 2.4 Overview of the ATV design and layout (3). 13 2.5 Exploded view of the REBR with copper housing (4). 14 2.6 REBR mission profile overview as initially conceived in it’s 2005 patent (5)........................................ 16 5.1 Panel shadowing in SCARAB from geometric surface area projections (6) 31 6.1 Inertial coordinate system for re-entry. 37 6.2 Drag coefficient as a function of Knudsen number as calculated by various fragmentation models, for an AA7075 Aluminium sphere of 1m diameter (2)........................................ 38 6.3 ISA density model with an exponential extension above 20km altitude. 41 6.4 Re-entry trajectory profiles. Note unequal axes for presentation purposes. 43 6.5 Velocity profiles versus time over full entry angle range. 43 6.6 Trajectoryaltitude-timehistory. 44 6.7 Mach number profiles, where the intersections with the black line indi- cates the beginning of the subsonic flight region. 44 6.8 G-loadinghistory................................ 45 6.9 Flight path angle evolution during re-entry. 45 vii LIST OF FIGURES 6.10 Altitude profile for lifting body with CL =0.05. Note the inflexion at moderate altitudes, causing an increase in total flight times. 49 7.1 Ariane-5 cryogenic main stage EPC body angular rates during re-entry (7)........................................ 54 7.2 MIR body angular rates during re-entry (8). 55 7.3 Calorimeter design for the RAFLEX air data system (9) . 60 7.4 Specific heat of Copper as a function of temperature (9). 62 7.5 Replication of temperature data generated by a calorimetric probe KFA2 during the RAFLEX II experiment on the MIRCA re-entry capsule (10). 63 7.6 Aerothermal heat flux output from Matlab model, with relevant compo- nents. 64 7.7 Post-processed aerothermal heat flux output from KFA2 calorimeter on- board RAFLEX (10). 65 7.8 Iridium coverage at sea-level using the 48 beams for all 66 satellites. 68 A.1 Drag force versus time over full entry angle range. 95 A.2 Gravitational acceleration profiles over full entry angle range. 96 A.3 Ground track profiles versus time over full entry angle range. 96 A.4 Ground-track in lifting-body scenario for CL =0.05. 97 A.5 Stagnation-point heat flux profiles over full entry angle range. 97 A.6 Stagnation-point temperatures over full entry angle range. 98 A.7 Comparison of exponential and ISA (black) density models. 98 A.8 Lifting body re-entry flight-path history for CL =0.05. 99 A.9 Lift force in lifting-body scenario for CL =0.05. 99 B.1 Ariane-5 sustained launch accelerations (11). 101 B.2 Ariane-5 shock envelope across vibration frequency spectrum (11). 102 viii List of Tables 2.1 SCARAB aerothermal models for various flow regimes (6). 11 4.1 MissionObjectives............................... 21 5.1 Tradeo↵ table comparing fully passive and active RHMS systems. 28 5.2 System requirements summary, with corresponding sections. 33 6.1 Initial conditions for low altitude trajectory . 39 6.2 Initial conditions for RHMS trajectory in ATV re-entry scenario. 41 6.3 Trajectory results for various initial entry angles. Entry and impact angles are relative to local horizontal. 42 6.4 Estimated data transmission times and subsequent maximum transmit- table data volumes, using flight-path angle as the main constraint. Times includea30secondconnectiondelay.. 48 7.1 ADIS16375 Performance specifications (12). 53 7.2 Melting temperature, thermal conductivity and penetration times for some common materials. 56 7.3 Calorimetric head parameters used in RAFLEX II and Matlab validation model(10).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ATV Preparing for Fiery Destruction 20 June 2011
    ATV preparing for fiery destruction 20 June 2011 ATV Johannes Kepler delivered about seven tonnes of much-needed supplies to the Space Station, including 1170 kg of dry cargo, 100 kg of oxygen, 851 kg of propellants to replenish the Station tanks and 4535 kg of fuel for the ferry itself to boost the outpost's altitude and make other adjustments. ATV-2 manoeuvred the complex on 2 April to avoid a collision with space debris. During the hectic mission of Johannes Kepler, two Space Shuttles and Japan's HTV cargo carrier ATV Jules Verne: mission accomplished! This video visited the Station, along with two Progress and capture shows ATV-1 after undocking on 5 September 2008. Credits: ESA TV Soyuz spacecraft. These required several changes of Station attitude, mostly controlled by ATV's thrusters. ATV Johannes Kepler has been an important part Big boosts and preparations for dive of the International Space Station since February. Next week, it will complete its mission by ATV's last important task was to give the Station's undocking and burning up harmlessly in the orbit a big boost. One important sequence was atmosphere high over an uninhabited area of the performed 12 June, another on 15 June and the Pacific Ocean. last one this afternoon, 17 June. Serving the International Space Station is a The combined effect of these manoeuvres was to valuable job but it will come to a spectacular end: raise the Station's orbit to around 380 km. ESA's second Automated Transfer Vehicle, packed with Station rubbish, will deliberately plummet to its destruction on Tuesday in Earth's atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Aeronautics and Space Report of the President: Fiscal Year 2011 Activities
    Aeronautics and Space Report of the President Fiscal Year 2011 Activities Aeronautics and Space Report of the President Fiscal Year 2011 Activities The National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 directed the annual Aeronautics and Space Report to include a “comprehensive description of the programmed activities and the accomplishments of all agencies of the United States in the field of aeronautics and space activities during the preceding calendar year.” In recent years, the reports have been prepared on a fiscal-year basis, consistent with the budgetary period now used in programs of the Federal Government. This year’s report covers Aeronautics and SpaceAeronautics Report of the President activities that took place from October 1, 2010, through September 30, 2011. TABLE OF CONTENTS National Aeronautics and Space Administration . 1. Fiscal Year 2011 Activities 2011 Year Fiscal • Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate 1 • Science Mission Directorate 18 • Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate 35 Department of Defense . 49 Federal Aviation Administration . 63 . Department of Commerce . 71. Department of the Interior . 97. Federal Communications Commission . 121 U.S. Department of Agriculture. 125 National Science Foundation . 137 . Department of State. 147 Department of Energy. 151 Smithsonian Institution . 157. Appendices . 163 . • A-1 U S Government Spacecraft Record 164 • A-2 World Record of Space Launches Successful in Attaining Earth Orbit or Beyond 165 • B Successful Launches to Orbit on U S Vehicles 166 • C Human Spaceflights 168 • D-1A Space Activities of the U S Government—Historical Table of Budget Authority in Millions of Real-Year Dollars 169 • D-1B Space Activities of the U S Government—Historical Table of Budget Authority in Millions of Inflation-Adjusted FY 11 Dollars 170 • D-2 Federal Space Activities Budget 171 • D-3 Federal Aeronautics Activities Budget 172 Acronyms .
    [Show full text]
  • October 2012 Orbiter
    Archive View – Month : Orbiter Article Archive for October 1st to October 31st. Generated on November 1, 2012, 8:48 pm Macs Go Big Posted Oct. 25, 2012 · Article In this video, Holleh Neyestanki discusses how the corporation will be supporting employees who use Macintosh. Graves Finds Failure Cause in RF Components Posted Oct. 24, 2012 · Feature Dr. Timothy Graves, laboratory manager, Space Materials Laboratory, Engineering and Technology Group, received a 2012 President’s Achievement Award for “for pivotal contributions in identifying and mitigating RF breakdown failure modes within communication systems on multiple national security space programs.” Graves identified root-cause failure mechanisms within RF components critical to customer missions — discovering and characterizing new modes of electrical discharges called multipaction that were responsible for overheating and failure of RF system components. Using Aerospace-developed facilities and expertise, Graves Eric Hamburg performed unique tests and implemented new diagnostics to Dr. Timothy Graves received a President's Achievement Award for his work in replicate and understand observed anomalies. Through an uncovering the cause of RF system failures. extensive research and hardware test program in the Aerospace Multipaction Test Facility developed by him, Graves provided new scientific insights into contamination effects and other contributing factors for previously unexplained events. Using physics-based tests and Aerospace data, he was able to quantify and recommend safe operational power limits that contributed to component redesigns and alterations in operations. As the principal U.S. expert in multipaction phenomenology within Aerospace and the technical community, Graves assumed an exemplary leadership role in exposing substantial risk to customer satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Message
    Journal of the Northern Sydney Astronomical Society Inc. Volume 22 Number 2 July 2011 President’s Message In this issue he year for NSAS is already halfway to be interesting in the future. The next Page 1: President’s message Tthrough, and it’s been eventful so program will be in August. Page 2: Calendar/Communications far. Some of you who do not attend ISS and Endeavour meetings may have missed the 2nd edition The guest speaker program this year Page 3: A Quadruple Conjunction of Reflections this year, as it was not has continued to run strongly and, at the Page 4: Parkes Field Trip published for the simple reason that moment, NSAS has guest speakers from Page 5: Lindfield School Event there were so few contributions from the the professional astrophysics community Page 6: Paul’s Corner membership that it would have not been booked for the rest of the year, with a Page 7: Supermassive Black Hole worthwhile. I’d like to remind everyone number of candidates selected for 2012. Page 8: Book Review in the Society that Reflections is a journal Our speakers so far have come from Editorial for the members, but also of the members. CSIRO, Macquarie, Sydney, and NSW the Central West Astronomical Society There’s no point in rehashing information Universities and they have talked to us on (see the more detailed article inside). Our that is available in the newspapers or the a wide range of subjects that form their intentions are to run another field trip, Web in Reflections, as these are available areas of expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Version
    Updated version HIGHLIGHTS IN SPACE TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS 2011 A REPORT COMPILED BY THE INTERNATIONAL ASTRONAUTICAL FEDERATION (IAF) IN COOPERATION WITH THE SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE, UNITED NATIONS. 28 March 2012 Highlights in Space 2011 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 5 I. OVERVIEW 5 II. SPACE TRANSPORTATION 10 A. CURRENT LAUNCH ACTIVITIES 10 B. DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES 14 C. LAUNCH FAILURES AND INVESTIGATIONS 26 III. ROBOTIC EARTH ORBITAL ACTIVITIES 29 A. REMOTE SENSING 29 B. GLOBAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS 33 C. NANOSATELLITES 35 D. SPACE DEBRIS 36 IV. HUMAN SPACEFLIGHT 38 A. INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION DEPLOYMENT AND OPERATIONS 38 2011 INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION OPERATIONS IN DETAIL 38 B. OTHER FLIGHT OPERATIONS 46 C. MEDICAL ISSUES 47 D. SPACE TOURISM 48 V. SPACE STUDIES AND EXPLORATION 50 A. ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS 50 B. PLASMA AND ATMOSPHERIC PHYSICS 56 C. SPACE EXPLORATION 57 D. SPACE OPERATIONS 60 VI. TECHNOLOGY - IMPLEMENTATION AND ADVANCES 65 A. PROPULSION 65 B. POWER 66 C. DESIGN, TECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT 67 D. MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES 69 E. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND DATASETS 69 F. AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS 72 G. SPACE RESEARCH FACILITIES AND GROUND STATIONS 72 H. SPACE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS & MEDICAL ADVANCES 74 VII. SPACE AND SOCIETY 75 A. EDUCATION 75 B. PUBLIC AWARENESS 79 C. CULTURAL ASPECTS 82 Page 3 Highlights in Space 2011 VIII. GLOBAL SPACE DEVELOPMENTS 83 A. GOVERNMENT PROGRAMMES 83 B. COMMERCIAL ENTERPRISES 84 IX. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION 92 A. GLOBAL DEVELOPMENTS AND ORGANISATIONS 92 B. EUROPE 94 C. AFRICA 101 D. ASIA 105 E. THE AMERICAS 110 F.
    [Show full text]
  • A Risk Assessment Tool for Highly Energetic Break-Up Events During the Atmospheric Re-Entry
    A risk assessment tool for highly energetic break-up events during the atmospheric re-entry A thesis submitted to the University of Dublin, Trinity College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Statistics, Trinity College Dublin January 2017 Cristina De Persis ii Declaration I declare that this thesis has not been submitted as an exercise for a degree at this or any other university and it is entirely my own work. I agree to deposit this thesis in the University’s open access institutional repository or allow the Library to do so on my behalf, subject to Irish Copyright Legislation and Trinity College Library conditions of use and acknowledgement. The copyright belongs jointly to the University of Dublin and Cristina De Persis. Cristina De Persis Dated: January 9, 2017 iv Abstract Most unmanned space missions end up with a destructive atmospheric re-entry. From ten to forty percent of a re-entering satellite’s mass may survive re-entry and hit the Earth’s surface. This has the potential to be a hazard to people, fauna, flora and produce economic damage. The severe consequences of inaccurate predictions of the area where the debris can re-enter and land result in the need to consider all the possible causes of fragmentation. This thesis proposes and discusses the application of two Bayesian statistical models, designed to be the principles that underlie a new risk assessment tool for the modelling of the fragmentation of a spacecraft, caused by highly energetic break-up events during the atmospheric re-entry.
    [Show full text]
  • REENTRY BREAKUP RECORDER: SUMMARY of DATA for HTV3 and ATV-3 REENTRIES and FUTURE DIRECTIONS William H
    REENTRY BREAKUP RECORDER: SUMMARY OF DATA FOR HTV3 AND ATV-3 REENTRIES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS William H. Ailor(1), Michael A. Weaver(2), Andrew S. Feistel(3), Marlon E. Sorge(4) (1) The Aerospace Corporation, PO Box 92957, M4/941, Los Angeles, CA 90009 USA, [email protected] (2) The Aerospace Corporation, PO Box 92957, M4/965, Los Angeles, CA 90009 USA, [email protected] (3) The Aerospace Corporation, PO Box 92957, M4/942, Los Angeles, CA 90009 USA, [email protected] (4) The Aerospace Corporation, PO Box 92957, ACP-520, Los Angeles, CA 90009 USA, [email protected] ABSTRACT vehicles tested, initial fragmentation during reentry began at approximately 87 km altitude, and major In late 2012, Japan’s H-II Transfer Vehicle, HTV3, and breakup events occurred at approximately 78 km. The the European Automated Transfer Vehicle, ATV-3, unexpected nature of these results has been verified by both ended their International Space Station (ISS) occasional observations of reentry events since that resupply missions by reentering the atmosphere and time. As an example, [2] reported that breakup of the breaking apart due to atmospheric heating and loads, Space Shuttle External Tank was observed to occur at with debris landing in the South Pacific Ocean. Both altitude ranges between 74 and 71 km (40 and 38 nmi), vehicles carried a Reentry Breakup Recorder (REBR) altitudes significantly lower than predicted at the time, that recorded and transmitted acceleration, attitude rate, even accounting for the effects of the thermal and other data during the reentry and breakup.
    [Show full text]