2015 Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment for East Riding of Yorkshire Council in Fulfillment of Part IV of the Environ

2015 Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment for East Riding of Yorkshire Council

In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management

September 2015

East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Local Authority Phil Hill Officer Snr Environmental Control Officer

Department Housing & Public Protection Council Offices, Church Street, Goole, East Riding Address of Yorkshire, DN14 5BG Telephone 01482 396204 e-mail [email protected]

Report Reference LAQM USA2015/ number Date September 2015

LAQM USA 2015 1 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Executive Summary

This Updating and Screening Assessment (USA) for 2015 is Phase 1 of the 6th round of the Air Quality Review and Assessment process.

The USA has been produced in accordance with guidance issued by Defra for reporting progress under the system of Local Air Quality Management. The role of the report is to chart the progress made by the Council in improving air quality since the publication of the 2012 USA.

The USA identifies all new pollutant sources, existing sources that have undergone relevant change, and any new or changed receptor locations relevant to those sources. Four diffusion tube monitoring locations are identified by the report where the annual mean NO2 objective was exceeded in 2014. Of these, three monitoring locations are not representative of relevant exposure and when the results are subjected to Defra’s NO2 fall-off with distance calculator, the predicted annual mean concentrations are all below 40μgm-3. The fourth location, adjacent one of the main routes from Hull into Beverley town centre, will benefit from the opening, in March 2015, of the new Beverley Southern Relief Road (BSSR), predicted to reduce through- traffic volume by around 60%. For all other monitoring locations, the report concludes there is no risk of any air quality objective being breached at any location of relevant exposure within the East Riding of Yorkshire.

In line with national policy, the Council will next produce an Annual Progress Report in 2016, which will include further assessment, supported by additional monitoring, of the four identified exceedences in order to determine whether there is a need to proceed to a Detailed Assessment.

Any comments or queries regarding this document should be addressed to:

Philip Hill David Howliston Senior Environmental Control Officer Environmental Control Manager East Riding of Yorkshire Council East Riding of Yorkshire Council Public Protection Division Public Protection Division Council Offices Town Hall Church Street Quay Road Goole Bridlington East Riding of Yorkshire East Riding of Yorkshire DN14 5BG YO16 4LP

Tel: 01482 396204 Tel: 01482 396211 Fax: 01482 396104 Fax: 01482 396103 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]

LAQM USA 2015 2 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table of contents

1 Introduction ...... 6 1.1 Description of Local Authority Area ...... 6 1.2 Purpose of Report ...... 6 1.3 Air Quality Objectives ...... 7 1.4 Summary of Previous Review and Assessments ...... 8 2 New Monitoring Data ...... 10 2.1 Summary of Monitoring Undertaken ...... 10 2.1.1 Automatic Monitoring Sites ...... 10 2.1.2 Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites ...... 12 2.2 Comparison of Monitoring Results with Air Quality Objectives ...... 24 2.2.1 Nitrogen Dioxide ...... 24

2.2.2 PM10 ...... 53 2.2.3 Sulphur Dioxide...... 56 2.2.4 Benzene ...... 56 2.2.5 Other pollutants monitored ...... 56 2.2.6 Summary of Compliance with AQS Objectives ...... 56 3 Road Traffic Sources ...... 57 3.1 Narrow Congested Streets with Residential Properties Close to the Kerb ...... 57 3.2 Busy Streets Where People May Spend 1-hour or More Close to Traffic ...... 57 3.3 Roads with a High Flow of Buses and/or HGVs...... 57 3.4 Junctions ...... 57 3.5 New Roads Constructed or Proposed Since the Last Round of Review and Assessment ...... 58 3.6 Roads with Significantly Changed Traffic Flows ...... 58 3.7 Bus and Coach Stations ...... 59 4 Other Transport Sources ...... 60 4.1 Airports ...... 60 4.2 Railways (Diesel and Steam Trains) ...... 60 4.2.1 Stationary Trains ...... 60 4.2.2 Moving Trains ...... 60 4.3 Ports (Shipping) ...... 60 5 Industrial Sources ...... 61 5.1 Industrial Installations ...... 61 5.1.1 New or Proposed Installations for which an Air Quality Assessment has been Carried Out ...... 61 5.1.2 Existing Installations where Emissions have Increased Substantially or New Relevant Exposure has been Introduced...... 62

LAQM USA 2015 3 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

5.1.3 New or Significantly Changed Installations with No Previous Air Quality Assessment ...... 62 5.2 Major Fuel (Petrol) Storage Depots ...... 62 5.3 Petrol Stations...... 63 5.4 Poultry Farms ...... 63 6 Commercial and Domestic Sources ...... 65 6.1 Biomass Combustion – Individual Installations ...... 65 6.2 Biomass Combustion – Combined Impacts ...... 66 6.3 Domestic Solid-Fuel Burning ...... 66 7 Fugitive or Uncontrolled Sources ...... 67 8 Conclusions and Proposed Actions ...... 68 8.1 Conclusions from New Monitoring Data ...... 68 8.2 Conclusions from Assessment of Sources ...... 69 8.3 Proposed Actions ...... 69 9 References ...... 70

List of Tables

Table 1.1 Air Quality Objectives included in Regulations for the purpose of LAQM in England Table 1.2 Previous Review and Assessment Reports

Table 2.1 Details of Automatic Monitoring Sites

Table 2.2 Details of Non- Automatic Monitoring Sites

Table 2.3 Results of Automatic Monitoring for NO2: Comparison with Annual Mean Objective Table 2.4 Results of Automatic Monitoring for NO2: Comparison with 1-hour Mean Objective

Table 2.5 Results of NO2 Diffusion Tubes 2014

Table 2.6 Results of NO2 Diffusion Tubes (2009 to 2014)

Table 2.7 Results of Automatic Monitoring of PM10: Comparison with Annual Mean Objective Table 2.8 Results of Automatic Monitoring for PM10: Comparison with 24-hour Mean Objective Table 5.1 Industrial sources that have been identified in East Riding of Yorkshire Council Area since 2012. Table 5.2 New Petrol Stations opened since the previous USA in 2012 Table 5.3 Individual Poultry Units since the previous USA in 2012. Table 6.1 Individual Biomass-Burning Installations

LAQM USA 2015 4 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

List of Figures

Figure 2.1 Map of Automatic Monitoring Stations, Beverley Figure 2.2 Map of Automatic Monitoring Stations, Beverley Figure 2.3 Summary of 2014 precision results and bias adjustment factors (ESG Didcot) Figure 2.4 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured at Beverley Kerbside Automatic Monitoring Site Between 2001 and 2012 Figure 2.5 Predicted annual mean NO2 Concentration (in g/m3) at the nearest receptor location to tube number 28 Figure 2.6 Predicted annual mean NO2 Concentration (in g/m3) at the nearest receptor location to tube number 72 Figure 2.7 Predicted annual mean NO2 Concentration (in g/m3) at the nearest receptor location to tube number 20. Figure 2.8 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Goole between 2002 and 2014 Figure 2.9a Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Beverley Between 2002 and 2014 Figure 2.9b Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Beverley Between 2002 and 2014 Figure 2.9c Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Beverley Between 2002 and 2014 Figure 2.10 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Cottingham Between 2002 and 2014 Figure 2.11 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Hedon Between 2002 and 2014 Figure 2.12 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Bridlington Between 2002 and 2014 Figure 2.13 Trend in Annual Mean PM10 Concentration Measured at Beverley Kerbside Automatic Monitoring Site Between 2001 and 2012 th Figure 2.14 Trend in 90 Percentile PM10 Concentration Measured at Beverley Kerbside Automatic Monitoring Site Between 2001 and 2012 Figure A1 Summary of 2014 Preceision Results and Bias Adjustment Factors (ESG Didcot) Figure A2 Summary of Laboratory Performance for the WASP/AIR PT Scheme for Analysis of NO2 Diffusion Tubes (April 2013 to February 2015)

Appendices

Appendix A QA/QC Data

LAQM USA 2015 5 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

1 Introduction 1.1 Description of Local Authority Area

The East Riding of Yorkshire is a large unitary authority with an area of 240,768 hectares and an estimated population of 334,179. Overall population density is very low, with only 1.4 people per hectare. Based on 2009 data from the Office of National Statistics (ONS), the largest town is Bridlington in the north east of the district, with 39,700 residents (although this is swelled dramatically by the influx of tourists during the summer months), the other major settlements being Beverley (32,200 – including Molescroft and Woodmansey); Goole (20,810) and Cottingham (17,650). Well over half the population reside in rural communities, many of which are small, scattered and geographically isolated. In total there are 333 settlements, ranging from large towns to small, isolated hamlets and farmsteads.

Traditionally the area has been associated with agriculture and 95% of the land is still in some form of agricultural use today. Tourism is of particular importance along the long coastal strip, whilst pockets of industry, including agricultural and aeronautical engineering, transport and distribution, glass manufacture, food and drinks manufacture and chemical production, are to be found inland in close proximity to the main conurbations. Natural gas refining is carried out in the far south east of the area whilst the inland port of Goole, served by vessels operating along the rivers Humber and Ouse has long been associated with the handling of coal and other materials. Mineral production is still important to the region, with the chalk uplands of the Wolds having a long historical link with quarrying.

East Riding's rail network primarily comprises services along the Hull to Scarborough line (via Cottingham, Beverley, Driffield and Bridlington), Hull to Doncaster/Sheffield line (via Brough and Goole), Hull to Leeds line (via Brough and Selby) and Hull to London line. Major Road links include the eastern section of the M62/A63 to Hull, the A164 (Humber Bridge to Beverley), the A1079 (Hull to York), the A614 (Goole to Bridlington) and the A165 (Hull to Bridlington).

Industrial sources of air pollution external to but capable of affecting air quality within the East Riding of Yorkshire include the Trent valley power stations to the south and the Aire valley power stations to the west.

1.2 Purpose of Report

This report fulfils the requirements of the Local Air Quality Management process as set out in Part IV of the Environment Act (1995), the Air Quality Strategy for England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland 2007 and the relevant Policy and Technical Guidance documents. The LAQM process places an obligation on all local authorities to regularly review and assess air quality in their areas, and to determine whether or not the air quality objectives are likely to be achieved. Where exceedences are considered likely, the local authority must then declare an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) and prepare an Air Quality Action Plan (AQAP) setting out the measures it intends to put in place in pursuit of the objectives.

LAQM USA 2015 6 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

The objective of this Updating and Screening Assessment is to identify any matters that have changed which may lead to risk of an air quality objective being exceeded. A checklist approach and screening tools are used to identify significant new sources or changes and whether there is a need for a Detailed Assessment. The USA report should provide an update of any outstanding information requested previously in Review and Assessment reports.

1.3 Air Quality Objectives

The air quality objectives applicable to LAQM in England are set out in the Air Quality (England) Regulations 2000 (SI 928), The Air Quality (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2002 (SI 3043), and are shown in Table 1.1. This table shows the objectives in units of microgrammes per cubic metre g/m3 (milligrammes per cubic metre, mg/m3 for carbon monoxide) with the number of exceedences in each year that are permitted (where applicable).

Table 1.1 Air Quality Objectives included in Regulations for the purpose of LAQM in England Air Quality Objective Date to be Pollutant Concentration Measured as achieved by 16.25 µg/m3 Running annual mean 31.12.2003 Benzene 5.00 µg/m3 Running annual mean 31.12.2010 1,3-Butadiene 2.25 µg/m3 Running annual mean 31.12.2003 Carbon monoxide 10.0 mg/m3 Running 8-hour mean 31.12.2003 0.5 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2004 Lead 0.25 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2008 200 µg/m3 not to be exceeded more than 1-hour mean 31.12.2005 Nitrogen dioxide 18 times a year 40 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2005 50 µg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 24-hour mean 31.12.2004 Particles (PM10) (gravimetric) 35 times a year 40 µg/m3 Annual mean 31.12.2004 350 µg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 1-hour mean 31.12.2004 24 times a year 125 µg/m3, not to be Sulphur dioxide exceeded more than 3 24-hour mean 31.12.2004 times a year 266 µg/m3, not to be exceeded more than 15-minute mean 31.12.2005 35 times a year

LAQM USA 2015 7 East Riding of Yorkshire Council 1.4 Summary of Previous Review and Assessments

East Riding of Yorkshire Council published stage 1 of its first round of review and assessment in March 1999 and found that further assessment in the form of a 2nd and 3rd stage review was required in respect of nitrogen dioxide, sulphur dioxide and particulates (PM10). The combined stage 2 & 3 assessment, published in April 2001 concluded that all objectives for the three pollutants would be met by the relevant target dates

The second round of review and assessment commenced in 2003 with an Updating and Screening Assessment (USA), compiled in accordance with the policy1 and technical2 guidance issued by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). The USA concluded that there was no risk of exceeding any of the Air Quality Objectives at any location of relevant exposure within the East Riding of Yorkshire. Progress Reports in 2004 and 2005 continued to support the conclusions of the USA.

Round three, consisting a further USA, produced in April 2006, and Progress Reports in 2007 and 2008, again concluded there was no risk of exceeding any Air Quality Objective at any location of relevant exposure within the East Riding of Yorkshire.

Round four, consisting the 2009 USA and Progress Reports in 2010 and 2011, was compiled in accordance with the revised policy3 and technical4 guidance.

One diffusion tube monitoring location identified an exceedence of the annual mean NO2 objective in 2010, before returning to compliance in 2011. The relatively large increase in the annual mean recorded in 2010 resulted from a combination of the effects of the exceptionally severe winter conditions, the introduction of a temporary one-way system in Beverley and from further hold-ups as a result of temporary traffic control measures affecting the interchange with the A1079 York Road. For all other locations of relevant exposure within the East Riding of Yorkshire, round four re- affirmed the previously reported position, identifying no need for the Council to proceed to a Detailed Assessment for any pollutant in relation to any relevant Air Quality Objective.

The 2012 USA confirmed the single 2010 exceedence had, as expected, returned to compliance in 2011. However, the report also identified exceedences at two further diffusion tube locations immediately adjacent the carriageway of the A614, the first on the outskirts of Goole and a second as it passes through Middleton-on-the-Wolds. As a result, additional monitoring was deployed along the route and it was concluded there was no need for the Council to proceed to a Detailed Assessment at that stage.

1 DEFRA Local Air Quality Management: Policy Guidance LAQM. PG(03) 2003 2 DEFRA Local Air Quality Management: Technical Guidance LAQM. TG(03) 2003 3 DEFRA Local Air Quality Management: Policy Guidance LAQM. PG(09) 2009 4 DEFRA Local Air Quality Management: Technical Guidance LAQM. TG(09) 2009

LAQM USA 2015 8 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Table 1.2 Previous Review and Assessment Reports

Year of Title of Report Outcome Publication Review & Assessment of Local Air Proceed to Detailed Quality – Stage 1 1999 Assessment for NO2, SO2 & PM10. Review & Assessment of Local Air No Further Detailed 2001 Quality – Stage 2 & 3 Assessment Required. Second Round Review and Assessment of Air Quality in the East No Detailed Assessment 2003 Riding of Yorkshire – Updating & Required Screening Assessment Second Round Review and No Detailed Assessment Assessment of Air Quality in the East 2004 Required Riding of Yorkshire – Progress Report Second Round Review and No Detailed Assessment Assessment of Air Quality in the East 2005 Required Riding of Yorkshire – Progress Report Third Round Review and Assessment of Air Quality in the East Riding of No Detailed Assessment 2006 Yorkshire – Updating & Screening Required Assessment Third Round Review and Assessment No Detailed Assessment of Air Quality in the East Riding of 2007 Required Yorkshire – Progress Report Third Round Review and Assessment No Detailed Assessment of Air Quality in the East Riding of 2008 Required Yorkshire – Progress Report Fourth Round Review and Assessment of Air Quality in the East Riding of No Detailed Assessment 2009 Yorkshire – Updating & Screening Required Assessment Fourth Round Review and Assessment No Detailed Assessment of Air Quality in the East Riding of 2010 Required Yorkshire – Progress Report Fourth Round Review and Assessment No Detailed Assessment of Air Quality in the East Riding of 2011 Required Yorkshire – Progress Report Fifth Round Review and Assessment of Air Quality in the East Riding of No Detailed Assessment 2012 Yorkshire – Updating & Screening Required Assessment

LAQM USA 2015 9 East Riding of Yoorkshire Council

2 New Monitoring Data 2.1 Summary of Monitoring Undertaken

2.1.1 Automatic Monitoring Sites

East Riding of Yorkshire Council had until December 2012 operated three Automatic Air Quality Monitoring Stations (AAQMS) at kerbside locations across its area (see Figures 2.1 & 2.2). Efficiency measures saw the decommissioning of these AAQMS in favour of an enhanced roadside network of nitrogen dioxide diffusion tubes. Details of the exact locations of the former AAAQMS and the pollutants moniitored are given in Table 2.1.

LAQM USA 2015 10 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Table 2.1 Details of Automatic Monitoring Sites Relevant Distance Does this Exposure? to Kerb Location Inlet (Y/N) Site Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In Monitoring of Represent Site Type Height distance ID Name Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? Technique Nearest Worst- (m) (m) to Road Case relevant (m) Exposure? exposure) Chemi- Beverley YES luminescence 1 Kerbside 503188 439016 3.0 NO2 PM10 NO 1.0m YES Kerbside TEOM & 2.0m VCM Chemi- Preston YES luminescence 2 Kerbside 518916 422918 3.0 NO2 PM10 NO 1.0m YES Kerbside* TEOM & 3.0m VCM Chemi- Grovehill YES luminescence 3 Kerbside 504881 439675 2.0 NO2 PM10 NO 2.0m YES Kerbside TEOM & 2.0m VCM

*The Preston Kerbside AAQMS ceased operation on 29th February 2012

LAQM USA 2015 11 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

2.1.2 Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites

A network of nitrogen dioxide diffusion tubes is deployed at kerbside locations across the Council’s area (see Table 2.2). Tubes supplied and analysed under contract by Environmental Scientifics Group (ESG Didcot) are prepared using the 50% TEA in Acetone method, in accordance with procedures set out in the Harmonisation Practical Guidance. The bias adjustment factor (0.81) derived from the National Diffusion Tube Bias Adjustment Factor Spreadsheet (Fig. 2.3) is applied to all annual mean diffusion tube data presented in this report.

Figure 2.3 Summary of 2014 precision results and bias adjustment factors (ESG Didcot)

LAQM USA 2015 12 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Table 2.2 Details of Non-Automatic Monitoring Sites Relevant Does this Is Monitoring Exposure? Location Site Co-located with Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height a Continuous to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? distance (m) Worst-Case (m) Analyser (m) to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) Main Street 1 (No.38), Roadside 471307 436378 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Bubwith Boothferry Rd, 2 Jcn of Pasture Roadside 474311 423741 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES Rd, Goole Rosecroft, 3 Rawcliffe Rd, Roadside 473344 423826 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES Goole York Rd 4 (No.10) Roadside 498628 439797 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Bishop Burton Boothferry Rd, 5 Jcn of Airmyn Roadside 473676 424045 2.5m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES Rd, Goole Lairgate 6 (No.22), Roadside 503208 439576 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Beverley Wednesday Market, Jcn 7 Roadside 503671 439477 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Lord Roberts Rd, Beverley Queensgate 8 (No.1), Roadside 503175 438975 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Beverley

LAQM USA 2015 13 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Relevant Does this Is Monitoring Exposure? Location Site Co-located with Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height a Continuous to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? distance (m) Worst-Case (m) Analyser (m) to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) Keldgate (No 9 163), Roadside 503197 438994 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Beverley Queensgate 10 (No.16), Roadside 503124 438888 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Beverley Victoria Rd 11 Roundabout, Roadside 503101 438511 3m NO2 NO NO YES (10m) <1m NO Beverley Wylies Rd/ 12 Manor Rd, Roadside 503145 440011 3m NO2 NO NO YES (4m) <1m YES Beverley New Walkergate, 13 (Wilbert Roadside 503557 439621 3m NO2 NO NO YES (3m) <1m YES Lane), Beverley Hengate, Jcn New 14 Roadside 503265 439855 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES Walkergate, Beverley Hengate 15 (No.5A), Roadside 503235 439828 2.5m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Beverley

LAQM USA 2015 14 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Is Monitoring Relevant Does this Co-located Exposure? Location Site Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In with a (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? Continuous distance (m) Worst-Case (m) (m) Analyser to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) Keldgate/George 16 Odey Court, Roadside 503632 439116 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Beverley Swinemoor Lane 17 (No.2), Beverley Roadside 504860 439766 3m NO2 NO NO YES (9m) <1m YES

Endyke Lane, 18 Jcn Hull Rd, Roadside 505607 432753 3m NO2 NO NO YES (10m)<1m NO Cottingham Priory 19 Rd/Newgate St, Roadside 504910 432616 3m NO2 NO NO YES (8m) <1m YES Cottingham 45 Front St 20 Middleton-on- Roadside 494380 449422 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES the-Wolds

Northgate 21 Roadside 503295 426503 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES (No.8), Hessle

A614 Boothferry 22 Roadside 475008 427875 3m NO2 NO NO YES (10m) <1m YES Road, Howden

Flatgate (No.5) 23 Roadside 475123 428508 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Howden

LAQM USA 2015 15 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Relevant Does this Is Monitoring Exposure? Location Site Co-located with Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height a Continuous to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? distance (m) Worst-Case (m) Analyser (m) to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) Flatgate 23 (No.5) Roadside 475123 428508 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Howden Keldgate 24 (No.51), Roadside 503513 439084 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Beverley Northgate 25 (No.8), Roadside 505036 433257 3m NO2 NO NO YES (8m) <1m YES Cottingham Albion Crt/Grovehill 26 Roadside 504849 439718 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Rd R/bout, Beverley Hull Road 27 (No.3), Roadside 515893 429000 3m NO2 NO NO YES (9m) <1m YES Saltend A63/Gibson 28 Lane North, Roadside 497107 426463 3m NO2 NO NO YES (10m) <1m YES Welton Newgate St (Cottingham 29 Roadside 504745 432634 3m NO2 NO NO YES (8m) <1m YES House), Cottingham

LAQM USA 2015 16 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Is Monitoring Relevant Does this Co-located Exposure? Location Site Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In with a (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? Continuous distance (m) Worst-Case (m) (m) Analyser to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) Swinemoor Lane 30 (opp Barmston Roadside 504748 439991 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES Rd), Beverley Swinemoor R/bout (Hull 31 Roadside 504214 440921 3m NO2 NO NO YES (10m)<1m YES Bridge Rd West), Beverley Swinemoor Lane 32 Roadside 504305 440906 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES R/bout, Beverley

Swinemoor Lane 33 Roadside 504809 439856 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES (No.9), Beverley

Swinemoor Lane 34 Roadside 504616 440280 3m NO2 NO NO YES (10m)<1m NO (No.83), Beverley

Dunswell Bridge 35 Lane (Jcn Roadside 507357 435100 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES A1174), Dunswell A1174 southbound 36 Roadside 507360 435164 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES (Dunswell school), Riverhead (No.2), 37 Roadside 502710 457252 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES Driffield

LAQM USA 2015 17 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Relevant Does this Is Monitoring Exposure? Location Site Co-located with Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height a Continuous to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? distance (m) Worst-Case (m) Analyser (m) to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) 28 Eastgate 38 Beverley Roadside 503743 439391 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES (08/13 – 12/ 13) 12 North Bar 39 Without Roadside 502962 439925 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Beverley 14 North Bar 40 Within Roadside 503201 439490 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Beverley 12 Railway 41 Street Roadside 503708 439540 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Beverley Flemingate 42 House, Roadside 503990 439215 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Beverley Grovehill 43 Road (No.4), Roadside 503987 439495 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES Beverley Southgate 44 (No.6), Roadside 520113 447540 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Hornsea St Augustines 45 Gate (No.38), Roadside 518897 428645 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Hedon

LAQM USA 2015 18 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Relevant Does this Is Monitoring Exposure? Location Site Co-located with Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height a Continuous to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? distance (m) Worst-Case (m) Analyser (m) to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) Hazeldene, 46 Main Street, Roadside 524642 425339 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Keyingham Main Street 47 (No.6), Roadside 518762 430448 3m NO2 NO NO YES (3m) <1m YES Preston Hull Rd/ 48 Grovehill Rd Roadside 504882 439677 3m NO2 NO NO YES (15m) <1m YES R/bout, Bev A165 Well 49 Lane Bypass, Roadside 517133 468073 3m NO2 NO NO YES (10m) <1m YES Bridlington

Kingsgate 50 Roadside 517549 466380 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Bridlington

Manor St. 51 Roadside 518371 466729 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Bridlington

Scarborough 52 Road (No.53), Roadside 517204 468062 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Bridlington 5 Church Hill 53 Rd Middleton- Roadside 494653 449592 3m NO2 NO NO YES (10m) <1m YES on-the-Wolds

LAQM USA 2015 19 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Relevant Does this Is Monitoring Exposure? Location Site Co-located with Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height a Continuous to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? distance (m) Worst-Case (m) Analyser (m) to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) 14 Church Hill 54 Rd Middleton- Roadside 494785 449608 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES on-the-Wolds Main Street 55 (Mill Farm), Roadside 487466 458982 3m NO2 NO NO YES (4m) <1m YES Fridaythorpe 1 Main St 56 Garton-on- Roadside 498550 459274 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES the-Wolds Scarborough Road (The 57 Roadside 501000 466991 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Saddlers), Langtoft Hospital Hill (Blacksmith's 58 Roadside 510333 462981 3m NO2 NO NO YES (1m) <1m YES Shop), Burton Agnes Main Road 59 (The Barn), Roadside 512763 464605 3m NO2 NO NO YES (3m) <1m YES Haisthorpe Main Street 60 (No.39), Roadside 514633 465474 3m NO2 NO NO YES (3m) <1m YES Carnaby

LAQM USA 2015 20 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Relevant Does this Is Monitoring Exposure? Location Site Co-located with Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height a Continuous to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? distance (m) Worst-Case (m) Analyser (m) to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) A1079 West (Rose Cottage 61 Roadside 476470 449113 3m NO2 NO NO YES (7m) <1m YES Farm), Barmby Moor A1079 East (No.3 York Road 62 Roadside 481945 445795 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <3m YES Cottages), Hayton A1079 East 63 (South View), Roadside 485143 443218 3m NO2 NO NO YES (7m) <1m YES Shiptonthorpe A1034 King St (The Old 64 Roadside 490086 439261 3m NO2 NO NO YES (6m) <1m YES Garage), Sancton Church Street 65 (No.38), North Roadside 489369 432549 3m NO2 NO NO YES (3m) <1m YES Cave Market Place 66 (No.19), South Roadside 492353 431090 3m NO2 NO NO YES (3m) <1m YES Cave Woodgates Lane 67 (No.35), North Roadside 498602 426523 3m NO2 NO NO YES (4m) <1m YES Ferriby

LAQM USA 2015 21 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Is Monitoring Relevant Does this Co-located Exposure? Location Site Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In with a (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? Continuous distance (m) Worst-Case (m) (m) Analyser to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) First Lane/Hull 68 Roadside 504195 426506 3m NO2 NO NO YES (3m) <1m YES Road, Hessle

West End 69 (No.54), Roadside 499296 436975 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Walkington Welton Rd 70 (No.3)/Station Roadside 493809 426956 3m NO2 NO NO YES (4m) <1m YES Rd, Brough Welton Rd 71 (No.58)/Skillings Roadside 494213 426881 3m NO2 NO NO YES (5m) <1m YES Lane, Brough A63 West 72 (Melton Roadside 497332 426384 3m NO2 NO NO YES (8m) <1m YES Grange), Melton

Wilson Street 73 Roadside 503406 428843 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES (No.27), Anlaby

Wolfreton Road 74 Roadside 503639 429370 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES (No.54), Anlaby

Main Street 75 (No.92b), Roadside 502430 430510 3m NO2 NO NO YES (2m) <1m YES Willerby

LAQM USA 2015 22 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.2 (cont) Relevant Does this Is Monitoring Exposure? Location Site Co-located with Distance Site X OS Grid Y OS Grid Pollutants In (Y/N) Represent Site Name Site Type Height a Continuous to Kerb ID Reference Reference Monitored AQMA? distance (m) Worst-Case (m) Analyser (m) to relevant Exposure? (Y/N) exposure) (Y/N) Beverley Road 76 Roadside 502518 429982 3m NO2 NO NO YES (3m) <1m YES (No.3), Willerby

Victoria Road 77 (No.94), Roadside 502704 437479 3m NO2 NO NO YES (3m) <1m YES Beverley

LAQM USA 2015 23 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

2.2 Comparison of Monitoring Results with Air Quality Objectives

Monitoring data are reviewed and assessed in accordance with the guidance given in Box 5.2 of Chapter 5 of LAQM. TG(09).

2.2.1 Nitrogen Dioxide

Mapped Estimated Background Concentrations

Estimated annual mean background concentrations for NOX and NO2 for each 1km x 1km grid of the UK have been mapped from 2011 base-year maps and projections for each year up to 2030 can be accessed at: http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/data/laqm-background-home

Automatic Monitoring Data

Until December 2012 the East Riding of Yorkshire Council operated a network of Automatic Air Quality Monitoring Stations at kerbside locations across its area (see Figures 2.1 & 2.2). Details of exact location and pollutants monitored are given in Table 2.1. The table shows the monitoring data for the last three years the stations were operational (the Preston site ceased operation on 29th February 2012)

Monitoring results for 2010, 2011 and 2012 are presented in table 2.3 and 2.4 below. The tables shows the monitoring data for the last three years the stations were operational (the Preston site ceased operation on 29th February 2012)

No annual mean NO2 concentration at any monitoring location exceeds 40gm-3.

No monitoring site has recorded more than 18 1-hour means above 200gm-3, or (where the period of valid data is less than 90% of a full year) has a 98th percentile of 1-hour concentrations exceeding 200gm-3.

A discernible increasing trend is evident in the annual mean NO2 concentration at the Beverley Kerbside monitoring site when viewed over the period 2001 to 2012 (figure 2.4). Trends for other automatic monitoring sites are not reported, since none remained in situ for 5 or more years prior to decommissioning.

LAQM USA 2015 24 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Table 2.3 Results of Automatic Monitoring for NO2: Comparison with Annual Mean Objective

Within Valid Data Capture Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) Valid Data Site ID Site Type AQMA? for Monitoring b c c c c c c a Capture 2012 % 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 (Y/N) Period % 1 Beverley Roadside NO 77.4% 77.4% 31 33 35 29 - - Kerbside 2 Preston Roadside NO 70.7% 12% 20 26 25 23 - - kerbside* 3 Grovehill Roadside NO 94.1% 94.1% 27 27 25 28 - - kerbside *The Preston Kerbside AAQMS ceased operation on 29th February 2012 a i.e. data capture for the monitoring period, in cases where monitoring was only carried out for part of the year b i.e. data capture for the full calendar year (e.g. if monitoring was carried out for six months the maximum data capture for the full calendar year would be 50%) c Means “annualised” as in Box 3.2 of TG(09) (http://laqm.defra.gov.uk/technical-guidance/index.html?d=page=38), where valid data capture is less than 75%

Table 2.4 Results of Automatic Monitoring for NO2: Comparison with 1-hour Mean Objective

Number of Hourly Means > 200µg/m3 Within c Valid Data Capture for Valid Data 2009 c c c c c Site ID Site Type AQMA? a b 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Monitoring Period % Capture 2012 % (99.8%ile (Y/N) (99.8%ile) (99.8%ile) (99.8%ile) (99.8%ile) (99.8%ile) ) 1 0 0 0 0 Beverley Roadside NO 77.4% 77.4% - - (126) (102) (111) (85) Kerbside 2 0 1 0 Preston Roadside NO 70.7% 12% - - - (49) (79) (88) kerbside* 3 0 1 0 0 Grovehill Roadside NO 94.1% 94.1% - - (127) (88) (73) (92) kerbside *The Preston Kerbside AAQMS ceased operation on 29th February 2012 a i.e. data capture for the monitoring period, in cases where monitoring was only carried out for part of the year b i.e. data capture for the full calendar year (e.g. if monitoring was carried out for six months the maximum data capture for the full calendar year would be 50%) c 99.8th percentile of hourly means required where data capture for full calendar year is less than 90%

LAQM USA 2015 25 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

35 Annual Mean NO2 Conc (µgm-3)

30 40 µgm-3 Annual Mean NO2 AQ Objective 25

20 TrenAd in Annual NO2 Conc.

nnual Mean NO2 Conc. (µgm-3) 5 A

0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year

Figure 2.4 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured at Beverley Kerbside Automatic Monitoring Site Between 2001 and 2012

LAQM USA 2015 26 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Diffusion Tube Monitoring Data

Annual mean nitrogen dioxide data from diffusion tube monitoring undertaken in 2014 are presented in table 2.5 below.

-3 Annual means in excess of the 40gm annual mean NO2 objective are highlighted in bold in the table. Four monitoring locations recorded an annual mean NO2 concentration exceeding 40gm-3:

 No. 9 – Keldgate (No 163), Beverley (44gm-3)  No. 20 – Front Street, Middleton-on-the-Wolds; (44gm-3)  No.28 – A63 / Gibson Lane, North Welton; and (53gm-3)  No.72 – A63 West (Melton Grange), Melton (43gm-3)

Comparison of annual mean diffusion tube results for the last five years are presented in Table 2.6 below.

Trends in annual mean NO2 concentrations from kerbside diffusion tube monitors in- situ for at least 5 years are shown in figures 2.5 to 2.9.

LAQM USA 2015 27 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.5 Results of Nitrogen Dioxide Diffusion Tubes in 2014

Within Triplicate or Co- Full Calendar Year Data 2014 Annual Mean Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? located Tube Capture 2014 Concentration (µg/m3) – (Y/N) (Y/N) (Number of Months or %) (Bias Adjustment factor = 0.81 b) Main Street 1 (No.38), Roadside NO NO 100 21 Bubwith Boothferry Rd, 2 Jcn Pasture Roadside NO NO 100 32 Rd, Goole Rosecroft, 3 Rawcliffe Rd, Roadside NO NO 100 34 Goole York Rd 4 (No.10) Bishop Roadside NO NO 100 35 Burton Boothferry Rd, 5 Jcn Airmyn Rd, Roadside NO NO 92 36 Goole Lairgate 6 (No.22), Roadside NO NO 100 31 Beverley Wednesday Market, Jcn 7 Roadside NO NO 92 36 Lord Roberts Rd, Beverley Queensgate 8 (No.1), Roadside NO NO 92 36 Beverley Keldgate 9 (No.163), Roadside NO NO 92 44 Beverley

1. LAQM USA 2015 28 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.5 (cont)

Within Triplicate or Co- Full Calendar Year Data 2014 Annual Mean Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? located Tube Capture 2014 Concentration (µg/m3) – (Y/N) (Y/N) (Number of Months or %) (Bias Adjustment factor = 0.81 b) Queensgate 10 (No.16), Roadside NO NO 100 37 Beverley Victoria Road 11 Roundabout, Roadside NO NO 100 27 Beverley Wylies 12 Rd/Manor Rd, Roadside NO NO 100 19 Beverley New Walkergate, 13 Roadside NO NO 100 27 (Wilbert Lane), Beverley Hengate, Jcn New 14 Roadside NO NO 100 26 Walkergate, Beverley Hengate 15 (No.5A), Roadside NO NO 100 38 Beverley Keldgate/George 16 Odey Court, Roadside NO NO 100 27 Beverley Swinemoor Lane 17 Roadside NO NO 100 29 (No.2), Beverley Endyke Lane, 18 Jcn Hull Rd, Roadside NO NO 100 30 Cottingham

1. LAQM USA 2015 29 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.5 (cont)

Within Triplicate or Co- Full Calendar Year Data 2014 Annual Mean Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? located Tube Capture 2014 Concentration (µg/m3) – (Y/N) (Y/N) (Number of Months or %) (Bias Adjustment factor = 0.81 b) Priory 19 Road/Newgate Roadside NO NO 92 28 St, Cottingham 45 Front St 20 Middleton-on- Roadside NO NO 92 44 the-Wolds Northgate 21 (No.8), Roadside NO NO 100 28 Hessle A614 Boothferry 22 Roadside NO NO 100 36 Road, Howden Flatgate 23 (No.5) Roadside NO NO 100 32 Howden Keldgate 24 (No.51), Roadside NO NO 100 29 Beverley Northgate 25 (No.8), Roadside NO NO 100 28 Cottingham Albion Court/ 26 Grovehill Rd Roadside NO NO 100 34 R/bout, Beverley Hull Road 27 (No.3), Roadside NO NO 100 31 Saltend A63/Gibson 28 Lane North, Roadside NO NO 100 53 Welton

1. LAQM USA 2015 30 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.5 (cont)

Within Triplicate or Co- Full Calendar Year Data 2014 Annual Mean Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? located Tube Capture 2014 Concentration (µg/m3) – (Y/N) (Y/N) (Number of Months or %) (Bias Adjustment factor = 0.81 b) Newgate St (Cottingham 29 Roadside NO NO 100 22 House), Cottingham Swinemoor Lane 30 (Barmston Roadside NO NO 100 27 Road), Beverley Swinemoor R/bout (Hull 31 Bridge Rd Roadside NO NO 100 27 West), Beverley Swinemoor 32 Lane (R/bout), Roadside NO NO 100 22 Beverley Swinemoor 33 Lane (No.9), Roadside NO NO 100 34 Beverley Swinemoor 34 Lane (No.83), Roadside NO NO 100 23 Beverley Dunswell Bridge Lane ( 35 Roadside NO NO 100 24 A1174), Dunswell A1174 36 (Dunswell Roadside NO NO 100 27 school), 1. LAQM USA 2015 31 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.5 (cont)

Riverhead (No.2), 37 Roadside NO NO 100 16 Driffield Eastgate (No.28), 38 Roadside NO NO 100 18 Beverley North Bar Without 39 Roadside NO NO 100 25 (No.12), Beverley North Bar Within 40 Roadside NO NO 100 27 (No.14), Beverley Railway St 41 Roadside NO NO 100 31 (No.12), Beverley Flemingate 42 Roadside NO NO 92 30 House, Beverley Grovehill Rd 43 (No.4), Roadside NO NO 100 20 Beverley Southgate (No.6), 44 Roadside NO NO 92 32 Hornsea St Augustine’s 45 Gate (No.38), Roadside NO NO 100 27 Hedon Hazeldene, Main 46 Street, Roadside NO NO 92 27 Keyingham

1. LAQM USA 2015 32 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.5 (cont)

Within Triplicate or Co- Full Calendar Year Data 2014 Annual Mean Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? located Tube Capture 2014 Concentration (µg/m3) – (Y/N) (Y/N) (Number of Months or %) (Bias Adjustment factor = 0.81 b) Main Street 47 (No.6), Roadside NO NO 100 33 Preston Hull Rd/ 48 Grovehill Rd Roadside NO NO 92 23 R/bout A165 Well Lane 49 Bypass, Roadside NO NO 100 27 Bridlington Kingsgate 50 Roadside NO NO 100 28 Bridlington Manor St. 51 Roadside NO NO 100 24 Bridlington Scarborough 52 Road (No.53), Roadside NO NO 100 33 Bridlington 5 Church Hill 53 Rd, Middleton- Roadside NO NO 100 39 on-the-Wolds 14 Church Hill 54 Rd, Middleton- Roadside NO NO 92 31 on-the-Wolds Main Street (Mill 55 Farm), Roadside NO NO 92 27 Fridaythorpe Main Street 56 (No.1), Garton- Roadside NO NO 100 25 on-the-Wolds

1. LAQM USA 2015 33 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.5 (cont)

Within Triplicate or Co- Full Calendar Year Data 2014 Annual Mean Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? located Tube Capture 2014 Concentration (µg/m3) – (Y/N) (Y/N) (Number of Months or %) (Bias Adjustment factor = 0.81 b) Scarborough Rd 57 (The Saddlers), Roadside NO NO 100 28 Langtoft Blacksmith's 58 Shop (A614), Roadside NO NO 92 26 Burton Agnes Main Rd 59 (The Barn), Roadside NO NO 100 21 Haisthorpe Main St 60 (No.39), Roadside NO NO 100 25 Carnaby A1079 (Rose 61 Cottage Farm), Roadside NO NO 100 26 Barmby Moor A1079 (3 York 62 Road Cottages), Roadside NO NO 92 26 Hayton A1079 East 63 (South View), Roadside NO NO 100 29 Shiptonthorpe A1034 (The Old 64 Garage), Roadside NO NO 92 19 Sancton Church St 65 (No.38), North Roadside NO NO 92 27 Cave Market Place 66 (No.19), South Roadside NO NO 100 31 Cave 1. LAQM USA 2015 34 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.5 (cont)

Within Triplicate or Co- Full Calendar Year Data 2014 Annual Mean Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? located Tube Capture 2014 Concentration (µg/m3) – (Y/N) (Y/N) (Number of Months or %) (Bias Adjustment factor = 0.81 b) Woodgates 67 Lane (No.35), Roadside NO NO 100 39 North Ferriby First Lane 68 (Jcn Hull Rd) Roadside NO NO 100 33 Hessle 3 Welton Rd 70 /Station Rd Roadside NO NO 100 28 R/bout, Brough Welton Rd 71 (No.58)/Skillings Roadside NO NO 100 26 Lane, Brough A63 West 72 (Melton Roadside NO NO 100 43 Grange), Melton Wilson St 73 (No.27), Roadside NO NO 92 26 Anlaby Wolfreton Rd 74 (No.54), Roadside NO NO 100 26 Anlaby Main Street 75 (No.92b), Roadside NO NO 100 22 Willerby Beverley Road 76 (No.3), Roadside NO NO 100 26 Willerby Victoria Road 77 (No.94), Roadside NO NO 100 31 Beverley 1. LAQM USA 2015 35 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

3 In bold = exceedence of the NO2 annual mean AQS objective of 40µg/m 3 Underlined = annual mean > 60µg/m , indicating a potential exceedence of the NO2 hourly mean AQS objective a Means “annualised” as in Box 3.2 of TG(09)( http://laqm.defra.gov.uk/technical-guidance/index.html?d=page=38), if full calendar year data capture is less than 75% b If an exceedence is measured at a monitoring site not representative of public exposure, NO2 concentration at the nearest relevant exposure have been estimated based on the “NO2 fall-off with distance” calculator (http://laqm.defra.gov.uk/tools-monitoring-data/no2- falloff.html), and results discussed below. The procedure is also explained in Box 2.3 of Technical Guidance LAQM.TG(09) (http://laqm.defra.gov.uk/technical-guidance/index.html?d=page=30

1. LAQM USA 2015 36 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.6 Results of Nitrogen Dioxide Diffusion Tubes (2009 to 2014)

Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) - Adjusted for Bias a Within 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Y/N) Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Factor = 0.868) Factor = 0.895) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.81) Factor =0.81) Main St 1 (No.38), Roadside NO - - - - 20 21 Bubwith Boothferry Rd, 2 Jn Pasture Roadside NO 38 36 34 33 30 32 Rd, Goole Rosecroft, 3 Rawcliffe Rd, Roadside NO - - 41 36 36 34 Goole York Rd 4 (No.10) Bishop Roadside NO - - 33 35 37 35 Burton Boothferry Rd, 5 Jcn Airmyn Roadside NO 32 36 36 34 36 36 Rd, Goole Lairgate 6 (No.22), Roadside NO 30 29 30 28 29 31 Beverley Wednesday Market, Jcn 7 Roadside NO 35 35 35 35 35 36 Lord Roberts Rd, Beverley Queensgate (No.1), 8 Roadside NO - - - - 36 36 Beverley (Since 03/13) Keldgate (No. 9 163), Beverley Roadside NO 44 (Since 02/13)

1. LAQM USA 2015 37 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.6 (cont) Site ID Location Site Type Within Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) - Adjusted for Bias a AQMA? 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 (Y/N) (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Factor = 0.868) Factor = 0.895) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.81) Factor = 0.81) Queensgate 10 (No.16), Roadside NO 36 42 39 38 36 37 Beverley Victoria Rd 11 Roadside NO 28 26 29 27 26 27 R/bout, Beverley Wylies Rd/ 12 Manor Rd, Roadside NO - - - 22 19 19 Beverley New Walkergate, 13 Roadside NO 26 30 30 28 28 27 (Wilbert Lane) Beverley Hengate / New 14 Walkergate, Roadside NO 29 29 32 30 28 26 Beverley Hengate 15 (No.5A), Roadside NO 34 38 34 34 34 38 Beverley Keldgate/George Odey Court, 16 Roadside NO - - - - 26 27 Beverley (Since 08/13) Swinemoor Lane 17 (No.2), Beverley Roadside NO - - - - 31 29 (Since 08/13) Endyke Lane, 18 Jcn Hull Rd, Roadside NO 36 34 33 34 28 30 Cottingham

1. LAQM USA 2015 38 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.6 (cont)

A614 Boothferry 22 Roadside NO - - - 40 36 36 Rd, Howden

Flatgate 23 (No.5) Roadside NO - - 35 34 32 32 Howden Keldgate 24 (No.51), Roadside NO 28 29 31 28 29 29 Beverley 8 Northgate 25 Cottingham Roadside NO - - - - 26 28 (Since 04/13) Albion Court/ 26 Grovehill Rd Roadside NO - - - 31 31 34 R/bout, Beverley

1. LAQM USA 2015 39 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.6 (cont)

Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) - Adjusted for Bias a Within 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Y/N) Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Factor = 0.868) Factor = 0.895) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.81) Factor = 0.81) Hull Rd (No.3), 27 Saltend Roadside NO - - - - 34 31 (Since 07/13) A63/Gibson Lane North, 28 Roadside NO - - - - 61 53 Welton (Since 08/13) Newgate St (Cottingham 29 House), Roadside NO - - - - 23 22 Cottingham (Since 08/13) Swinemoor Lane 30 Roadside NO 32 29 28 24 28 27 (Barmston Rd) Beverley Swinemoor R/bout (Hull 31 Bridge Road Roadside NO 28 30 29 27 28 27 West), Beverley Swinemoor 32 Lane R/bout Roadside NO 26 28 29 24 23 22 Beverley 9 Swinemoor 33 Lane, Beverley Roadside NO - - - - 35 34 (Since 08/13)

1. LAQM USA 2015 40 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.6 (cont)

Riverhead 37 Roadside NO - - - - 17 16 (No.2), Driffield

28 Eastgate 38 Beverley Roadside NO - - - - 22 18 (Since 08/13) 12 North Bar 39 Without, Roadside NO 22 27 26 26 25 25 Beverley 14 North Bar 40 Within, Roadside NO 27 31 34 30 29 27 Beverley Railway St 41 (No.12), Roadside NO 30 31 35 32 30 31 Beverley Flemingate 42 House, Roadside NO 32 32 35 31 31 30 Beverley

1. LAQM USA 2015 41 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.6 (cont)

Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) - Adjusted for Bias a Within Site 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Location Site Type AQMA? ID (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Y/N) Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Factor = 0.868) Factor = 0.895) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.81) Factor = 0.81) Grovehill Rd 43 (No.4), Roadside NO 22 20 22 21 20 20 Beverley Southgate (No.6), Hornsea 44 Roadside NO - - - - 34 32 (Mar ’13 – Dec ‘13) St Augustines 45 Gate (No.38), Roadside NO 28 29 29 28 26 27 Hedon Hazeldene, Main St, 46 Roadside NO - - - - 29 27 Keyingham (Since 07/13) Main Street 47 (No.6), Roadside NO 32 34 34 34 33 33 Preston Hull Rd/ 48 Grovehill Rd Roadside NO 27 29 28 26 23 23 R/bout A165 Well Lane Bypass, 49 Roadside NO - - - - 28 27 Bridlington (Since 03/13) Kingsgate 50 Roadside NO 28 27 29 27 28 28 Bridlington

1. LAQM USA 2015 42 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.6 (cont)

Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) - Adjusted for Bias a Within 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Y/N) Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Factor = 0.868) Factor = 0.895) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.81) Factor = 0.81) Manor St. 51 Roadside NO 25 25 27 25 24 24 Bridlington Scarborough 52 Rd (No.53), Roadside NO - - - - 31 33 Bridlington 5 Church Hill 53 Rd, Middleton- Roadside NO - - - 37 42 39 on-the-Wolds 14 Church Hill 54 Rd, Middleton- Roadside NO - - - 31 29 31 on-the-Wolds Main Street 55 (Mill Farm), Roadside NO - - - 22 24 27 Fridaythorpe 1 Main St, 56 Garton-on-the- Roadside NO - - - 23 24 25 Wolds The Saddlers, 57 Scarborough Roadside NO - - - 27 28 28 Rd, Langtoft Blacksmith's 58 Shop (A614), Roadside NO - - - 30 31 26 Burton Agnes Main Rd 59 (The Barn), Roadside NO - - - 20 22 21 Haisthorpe Main St 60 (No.39), Roadside NO - - - 24 25 25 Carnaby 1. LAQM USA 2015 43 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.6 (cont)

Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) - Adjusted for Bias a Within 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Y/N) Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Factor = 0.868) Factor = 0.895) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.81) Factor = 0.81) A1079 West (Rose Cottage 61 Roadside NO - - - - 27 26 Farm), Barmby Moor A1079 (3 York 62 Rd Cottages), Roadside NO - - - - 23 26 Hayton A1079 63 (South View), Roadside NO - - - - 31 29 Shiptonthorpe A1034 (The Old 64 Garage), Roadside NO - - - - 20 19 Sancton Church St 65 (No.38), North Roadside NO - - - - 25 27 Cave Market Place 66 (No.19), Roadside NO - - - - 32 31 South Cave 35 Woodgates 67 Lane, North Roadside NO - - - - 39 39 Ferriby First Lane/ 68 Hull Road, Roadside NO - - - - 34 33 Hessle West End 69 (No.54), Roadside NO - - - - 25 26 Walkington

1. LAQM USA 2015 44 East Riding of Yorkshire Council Table 2.6 (cont)

Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) - Adjusted for Bias a Within 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Site ID Location Site Type AQMA? (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Bias (Y/N) Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Factor = 0.868) Factor = 0.895) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.782) Factor = 0.81) Factor = 0.81) 3 Welton Rd 70 /Station Rd Roadside NO - - - - 24 28 R/bout, Brough 58 Welton Rd 71 /Skillings Lane, Roadside NO - - - - 27 26 Brough A63 West 72 (Melton Roadside NO - - - - 39 43 Grange), Melton Wilson St 73 (No.27), Roadside NO - - - - 27 26 Anlaby Wolfreton Rd 74 (No.54), Roadside NO - - - - 22 26 Anlaby Main St 75 (No.92b), Roadside NO - - - - 22 22 Willerby Beverley Road 76 (No.3), Roadside NO - - - - 28 26 Willerby Victoria Road 77 (No.94), Roadside NO - - - - 29 31 Beverley 3 In bold, exceedence of the NO2 annual mean AQS objective of 40µg/m 3 Underlined, annual mean > 60µg/m , indicating a potential exceedence of the NO2 hourly mean AQS objective a Means “annualised” as in Box 3.2 of TG(09) (http://laqm.defra.gov.uk/technical-guidance/index.html?d=page=38), if full calendar year data capture is less than 75%

1. LAQM USA 2015 45 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Findings The nitrogen dioxide diffusion tube monitoring results shown in Table 2.5 indicate that the following locations exceeded the 40gm-3 annual mean objective concentration in 2014:

Tubes No.28 and No.72 are located adjacent to the A63, the eastern extremity of the M62 motorway and the main route into Hull. Tube No.28 has shown a significant (13%) decrease between 2013 and 2014, with the annual mean NO2 concentration 3 3 decreasing from 61g/m to 53g/m . Tube No.72 has recorded an annual mean NO2 concentration increased by 9% from 39g/m3 to 43g/m3. Neither of these tube locations is representative of public exposure. When subjected to the Defra “NO2 fall- off with distance” calculator the predicted annual mean NO2 concentrations at the nearest, respective receptor locations for these tubes are both within the 40g/m3 objective (Fig’s 2.5 and 2.6). Monitoring continues at both locations and additional diffusion tubes have been deployed along this stretch of the route at varying distances from the kerb, the results to be reported and discussed in future reports.

This calculator allows you to predict the annual mean NO2 concentration for a location ("receptor") that is close to a monitoring site, but nearer or further the kerb than the monitor. The next sheet shows your results on a graph. Enter data into the yellow cells

Step 1 How far from the KERB was your measurement made (in metres)? (Note 1) 0 2 metres

Step 2 How far from the KERB is your receptor (in metres)? (Note 1) 0 20 metres

3 3 Step 3 What is the local annual mean background NO2 concentration (in g/m )? (Note 2) 0 14.6166 g/m

3 3 Step 4 What is your measured annual mean NO2 concentration (in g/m )? (Note 2) 0 53 g/m

3 3 Result The predicted annual mean NO2 concentration (in g/m ) at your receptor (Note 3) 32.3 g/m

Note 1: In some cases the term "kerb" may be taken to be the edge of the trafficked road - see the FAQ at http://laqm2.defra.gov.uk/FAQs/Monitoring/Location/index.htm for further details. Distances should be measured horizontally from the kerb and assume Note 2: The measurement and the background must be for the same year. The background concentration could come from the national maps published at www.airquality.co.uk, or alternatively from a nearby monitor in a background location. Note 3: The calculator follows the procedure set out in Box 2.3 of LAQM TG(09). The results will have a greater uncertainty than the measured data. More confidence can be placed in results where the distance between the monitor and the receptor is small

Issue 4: 25/01/11. Created by Dr Ben Marner; Approved by Prof Duncan Laxen. Contact: [email protected]

Figure 2.5 Predicted annual mean NO2 Concentration (in g/m3) at the nearest receptor location to tube number 28.

1. LAQM USA 2015 46 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Step 1 How far from the KERB was your measurement made (in metres)? (Note 1) 0 5.5 metres

Step 2 How far from the KERB is your receptor (in metres)? (Note 1) 0 16 metres

3 3 Step 3 What is the local annual mean background NO2 concentration (in g/m )? (Note 2) 0 14.6166 g/m

3 3 Step 4 What is your measured annual mean NO2 concentration (in g/m )? (Note 2) 0 43 g/m

3 3 Result The predicted annual mean NO2 concentration (in g/m ) at your receptor (Note 3) 33.7 g/m

Figure 2.6 Predicted annual mean NO2 Concentration (in g/m3) at the nearest receptor location to tube number 72

In 2013 and after 12 years of co-location with a (now decommissioned) reference method analyser at the junction of Admiral Walker Road and Keldgate in Beverley, Tube No 9 was relocated across the road (outside No.163 Keldgate). Table 2.5 3 shows the tube recorded an annual mean NO2 concentration of 44g/m for 2014, having previously recorded a 12-year average annual mean concentration of 30.5gm-3 prior to relocation. The Beverley Southern Relief Road (BSRR) was opened in March 2015. Proposals for the new road were originally reported in the 2004 Progress Report; it has been specifically designed to divert traffic away from Beverley town centre, with Keldgate predicted to benefit from an estimated 60% reduction. The addition of a proposed park and ride scheme, to be located on the outskirts of Beverley, will see further reductions in through-town traffic in coming years. Monitoring at this location will continue for the foreseeable future and the results published and discussed in future reports.

Tube No.20 has been deployed at its current location outside No.45 Front Street since 2012. Having recorded an exceedence (43g/m3) of the annual mean objective in 2011, it was relocated from its previous position (outside No.30 Front Street) in order to give a better representation of relevant exposure. This latest monitoring location is at the kerbside of the A614 as it passes through the village of Middleton–on-the-Wolds. This is the main route connecting the coastal resort of Bridlington with the M62 motorway and A1079 Hull to York trunk road. The tube 3 3 recorded an annual mean NO2 concentration of 44g/m in 2014 (41g/m in both 2012 and 2013). When subjected to the “fall-off with distance” calculator the predicted annual mean NO2 concentration at the façade of the nearest relevant receptor falls to 35g/m3 (Fig. 2.7)

1. LAQM USA 2015 47 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Additional tubes have been deployed along this stretch of road since 2012 to characterise the situation in the village. Tubes No.53 and 54, located kerbside outside residential properties on Church Hill Road, have returned annual mean NO2 concentrations for 2104 of 39g/m3 and 31g/m3 respectively.

Diffusion tube monitoring continues in Middleton-on-the-Wolds; the results will be reported and discussed in the 2016 Progress Report.

Step 1 How far from the KERB was your measurement made (in metres)? (Note 1) 0 0.1 metres

Step 2 How far from the KERB is your receptor (in metres)? (Note 1) 0 0.9 metres

3 3 Step 3 What is the local annual mean background NO2 concentration (in g/m )? (Note 2) 0 14.6166 g/m

3 3 Step 4 What is your measured annual mean NO2 concentration (in g/m )? (Note 2) 0 44 g/m

3 3 Result The predicted annual mean NO2 concentration (in g/m ) at your receptor (Note 3) 35.1 g/m

Figure 2.7 Predicted annual mean NO2 Concentration (in g/m3) at the nearest receptor location to tube number 20.

Tube No.3 (Rawcliffe Road, Goole), having recorded an annual mean NO2 concentration of 41g/m3 in 2011, has, as predicted, returned to a level below the 40g/m3 objective, recording an annual mean concentration of 36g/m3 in both 2012 and 2013, and 34g/m3 in 2014. Monitoring still continues at this location adjacent the main traffic route into Goole town centre.

Trends in annual mean NO2 concentrations from kerbside diffusion tube monitors in- situ for at least 5 years are shown in figures 2.8 to 2.12.

1. LAQM USA 2015 48 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

30 Council Offices, Stanhope Street, Goole (removed 2010)

25 Boothferry Road, Junction of Pasture Road, Goole

20 Boothferry Road, Junction of Airmyn Road, Goole

15 Rosecroft, Rawcliffe Rd, Goole Annual Mean NO2 Conc. (µgm-3) Annual

0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Year

Figure 2.8 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Goole between 2002 and 2014

Lairgate (Outside No.28), Beverley

25 Wednesday Market, Junction of Lord Roberts Road, Beverley

10 Annual Mean NO2 Conc. (µgm-3) Annual

0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Year

Figure 2.9a Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Beverley between 2002 and 2014

1. LAQM USA 2015 49 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Admiral Walker Road, Junction of Keldgate, 30 Beverley (removed 2013)

Queensgate, Beverley 25

Victoria Road Roaundabout, Beverley

New Walkergate, Junction of Morton Lane, Beverley (removed 2013) 15

10 Annual Mean NO2 Conc (ugm-3) Annual

0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Year

Figure 2.9b Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Beverley between 2002 and 2014

New Walkergate, Junction of Wilbert Lane, 30 Beverley ) -3

25 Hengate, Junction of New Walkergate, Beverley

20 Conc (ugm 2 Hengate (Outside No.5A), Beverley

Hengate, Junction of Ladygate, Beverley

10 Annual Mean NO

0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Year

Figure 2.9c Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Beverley between 2002 and 2014

1. LAQM USA 2015 50 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

30 Endyke Lane, Junction of Hull Road, Cottingham ) -3

Thwaite Street Level Crossing, Cottingham (removed 2013) 20 Conc (ugm 2

10 Annual Mean NO

0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Year

Figure 2.10 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Cottingham between 2002 and 2014

30 )

-3 Sheriff Highway, junction with Fletcher Gate, 25 Hedon (removed 2013)

20 Conc (ugm

2 St Augustines Gate (Outside No.28), Hedon

10 Annual Mean NO

0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Year

Figure 2.11 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Hedon between 2002 and 2014

1. LAQM USA 2015 51 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

30 )

-3 Manor St. Bridlington 25

Cross St. Bridlington (removed 2013) 20 Conc (ugm 2

10 Annual Mean NO

0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Year

Figure 2.12 Trends in Annual Mean Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Measured by Diffusion Tube at Kerbside Locations in Bridlington between 2002 and 2014

1. LAQM USA 2015 52 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

2.2.2 PM10

Until December 2012 the East Riding of Yorkshire Council operated a network of Automatic Air Quality Monitoring Stations (AAQMS) at two kerbside locations in Beverley and one in the village of Preston, near Hull (see Figures 2.1 & 2.2).

Monitoring results for the last four years of operation (2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012) prior to decommissioning are presented in tables 2.7 and 2.8 below. The Preston AAQMS ceased operation in February 2012, so results are presented to 2011 only.

-3 No monitored annual mean PM10 concentration exceeded 40gm .

No monitoring site has recorded more than 35 exceedences of the 50gm-3 24-hour mean, or has a 90thpercentile of 24-hour concentrations exceeding 50gm-3.

1. LAQM USA 2015 53 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Table 2.7 Results of Automatic Monitoring of PM10: Comparison with Annual Mean Objective Confirm Annual Mean Concentration (µg/m3) Valid Data Capture Valid Data Site Within Gravimetric Site ID for Monitoring Capture Type AQMA? Equivalent 2009 c 2010 c 2011* c 2012 c 2013 c 2014 Period % a 2012 % b (Y or N/A) 1 Beverley Roadside NO 96.4 96.4 N/A 23 22 23 23 - - Kerbside 2 Preston Roadside NO 0% 0% N/A 19 19 21 - - - Kerbside 3 Grovehill Roadside NO 95.4 95.4 N/A 21 23 24 24 - - Kerbside a i.e. data capture for the monitoring period, in cases where monitoring was only carried out for part of the year b i.e. data capture for the full calendar year (e.g. if monitoring was carried out for six months the maximum data capture for the full calendar year would be 50%) c Means “annualised” as in Box 3.2 of TG(09) (http://laqm.defra.gov.uk/technical-guidance/index.html?d=page=38), if valid data capture is less than 75%

Table 2.8 Results of Automatic Monitoring for PM10: Comparison with 24-hour Mean Objective Valid Data Confirm Number of Daily Means > 50µg/m3 Valid Data Site Within Capture for Gravimetric Site ID Capture c c c c c 2014 c Type AQMA? Monitoring Period Equivalent 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2012 % b (90.4%ile) (90.4%ile) (90.4%ile) (90.4%ile) (90.4%ile) (90.4%ile) % a (Y or N/A) 1 10 4 17 7 Beverley Roadside NO 96.4 96.4 N/A - - (35 (35) (40) (33) Kerbside 2 3 3 9 Preston Roadside NO 0% 0% N/A - - - (27) (28) (33) Kerbside 3 1 11 19 15 Grovehill Roadside NO 95.4 95.4 N/A - - (33) (37) (40) (41) Kerbside a i.e. data capture for the monitoring period, in cases where monitoring was only carried out for part of the year b i.e. data capture for the full calendar year (e.g. if monitoring was carried out for six months the maximum data capture for the full calendar year would be 50%) c The 90.4th percentile of 24-hour means is included in brackets

1. LAQM USA 2015 54 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

A discernible decreasing trend is evident in both the annual mean (Fig. 2.12) and the th 90 percentile of 24 hour mean (Fig. 2.13) PM10 concentrations at the Beverley Kerbside monitoring site between 2001 and 2012. Trends for other automatic monitoring sites are not reported, since none was in situ for 5 or more years prior to decommissioning.

30 ) -3

25 Annual Mean PM10 Conc (µgm-3) 40 µgm-3 Annual Mean PM10 AQ Objective Annual Mean PM10 Trend Conc. (ugm Conc. 20 10 PM

0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year

Figure 2.13 Trend in Annual Mean PM10 Concentration Measured at Beverley Kerbside Automatic Monitoring Site Between 2001 and 2012

40 ) -3

90%ile PM10 Conc (µgm-3) 30 50 µgm-3 24 Hour Mean PM10 AQ Objective ) 90%ile PM10 Trend Conc. Conc. (ugm 10 PM

0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Year

th Figure 2.14 Trend in 90 Percentile PM10 Concentration Measured at Beverley Kerbside Automatic Monitoring Site Between 2001 and 2012

1. LAQM USA 2015 55 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

2.2.3 Sulphur Dioxide

The East Riding of Yorkshire Council does not monitor Sulphur Dioxide (SO2)

2.2.4 Benzene (C6H6)

The East Riding of Yorkshire Council does not monitor Benzene

2.2.5 Other pollutants monitored

The East Riding of Yorkshire Council does not monitor any other pollutants.

2.2.6 Summary of Compliance with AQS Objectives

East Riding of Yorkshire Council has examined the results from monitoring in the district. With the exception of the 4 diffusion nitrogen dioxide tube monitoring locations discussed, monitored concentrations are all below the relevant objectives.

Diffusion Tube monitoring will continue at these locations. The Council has concluded there is no need to proceed to a Detailed Assessment at this stage.

Further assessment of the areas of potential exceedance continues and will be reported as part of the Progress Report in 2016.

1. LAQM USA 2015 56 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

3 Road Traffic Sources

3.1 Narrow Congested Streets with Residential Properties Close to the Kerb

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no new/newly identified congested streets with a flow above 5,000 vehicles per day and residential properties close to the kerb, that have not been adequately considered in previous rounds of Review and Assessment.

3.2 Busy Streets Where People May Spend 1-hour or More Close to Traffic

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no new/newly identified busy streets where people may spend 1 hour or more close to traffic.

3.3 Roads with a High Flow of Buses and/or HGVs.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no new/newly identified roads with high flows of buses/HDVs.

3.4 Junctions

In March 2015, the Beverley Southern Relief Road (BSRR) was brought into operational use. This new road, discussed in previous review and assessment reports since 2004, forms part of the Beverley Integrated Transport Plan (BITP) specifically designed to divert traffic away from Beverley town centre, with certain routes predicted to benefit from an estimated 60% reduction in traffic volumes. New roundabouts have been created at either end of the BSSR to connect it to the existing road network, and the existing Grovehill Road roundabout on the A1174 Hull Road has undergone extensive re-configuration in anticipation of the additional volume of traffic diverted away from town centre routes.

1. LAQM USA 2015 57 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

An Air Quality Assessment, prepared as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the BSSR, concluded there will be no significant adverse impacts as a result of the new road scheme.

An existing network of nitrogen dioxide diffusion tubes has been strategically located in and around Beverley to assess the impact of this scheme and to compare NO2 concentrations before and after bringing the road into use. The monitoring results will be reported and discussed in future reports.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council has assessed new/newly identified junctions meeting the criteria in Section A.4 of Box 5.3 in TG(09), and concluded that it will not be necessary to proceed to a Detailed Assessment.

3.5 New Roads Constructed or Proposed Since the Last Round of Review and Assessment

In March 2015, the Beverley Southern Relief Road (BSRR) was brought into operational use. This new road, discussed in previous review and assessment reports since 2004, forms part of the Beverley Integrated Transport Plan (BITP) specifically designed to divert traffic away from Beverley town centre, with certain routes predicted to benefit from an estimated 60% reduction in traffic volumes. The addition of a proposed park and ride scheme, located on the outskirts of Beverley, will see further reductions in through-town traffic in coming years. An existing network of nitrogen dioxide diffusion tubes has been strategically located in and around Beverley to assess the impact of this work and to compare NO2 concentrations before and after bringing the road into use.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms there are no other new roads or newly identified roads with significantly changed traffic flows in the Local Authority area since the last Updating and Screening Assessment.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council has assessed new/proposed roads meeting the criteria in Section A.5 of Box 5.3 in TG(09), and concluded that it will not be necessary to proceed to a Detailed Assessment.

3.6 Roads with Significantly Changed Traffic Flows

1. LAQM USA 2015 58 East Riding of Yorkshire Council existing road network, and the existing Grovehill Road roundabout on the A1174 Hull Road has undergone extensive re-configuration in anticipation of the additional volume of traffic diverted away from town centre routes.

An Air Quality Assessment, prepared as part of the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for the BSSR, concluded there will be no significant adverse impacts as a result of the new road scheme.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council has assessed new/newly identified roads with significantly changed traffic flows, and concluded that it will not be necessary to proceed to a Detailed Assessment.

3.7 Bus and Coach Stations

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no relevant bus stations in the Local Authority area.

1. LAQM USA 2015 59 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

4 Other Transport Sources 4.1 Airports

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no airports in the Local Authority area.

4.2 Railways (Diesel and Steam Trains)

4.2.1 Stationary Trains

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no locations where diesel or steam trains are regularly stationary for periods of 15 minutes or more, with potential for relevant exposure within 15m.

4.2.2 Moving Trains

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no locations with a large number of movements of diesel locomotives, and potential long-term relevant exposure within 30m.

4.3 Ports (Shipping)

Whilst relevant exposure exists within 1km of the berths and main manoeuvring areas at the Port of Goole, the annual number of vessel movements remains below 3,000 and is not considered significant in terms of sulphur dioxide emissions.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no ports or shipping that meet the specified criteria within the Local Authority area.

1. LAQM USA 2015 60 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

5 Industrial Sources 5.1 Industrial Installations

The current section of the report is carried out in line with Section C.1 of Box 5.5 of TG(09) and is required to consider proposed sources for which planning approval has been granted. Industrial sources are considered in the sections below,

5.1.1 New or Proposed Installations for which an Air Quality Assessment has been Carried Out

The following, relevant industrial sources have been identified since East Riding of Yorkshire Council’s last USA in 2012.

Table 5.1 Industrial sources that have been identified in East Riding of Yorkshire Council Area since 2012.

Name and Address of Grid Reference Type of Installation Installation

New Installations Biowise Ltd Albion Lane, Willerby, TA 012 122 Composting HU10 6TS

Rathlin Energy (UK) Limited Crawberry Hill Well Site, SE 977 377 Shale Gas Exploration Bishop Burton, HU17 8RU

Rathlin Energy (UK) Limited West Newton Well Site, TA 193 391 Shale Gas Exploration West newton, HU11 5DA

Bob Stabler & Sons Ltd Lowthorpe Quarry, Ruston TA 070 172 Waste Treatment Parva, YO25 4D

Simpsons Quarries Ltd Middleton Quarry, Station SE 942 501 Chalk Quarrying Road, Middleton on the Wolds, YO25 9BS SCA Timber Supply Ltd Gibson Lane, Melton, HU14 3HF SE 972 253 Timber Manufacturing

1. LAQM USA 2015 61 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Name and Address of Grid Reference Type of Installation Installation

New Installations Summerbridge Doors Ltd Sprinfield Way, Anlaby, TA 043 291 Timber Manufacturing HU10 6RJ

Victory Leisure Homes Ltd SE838 283 Timber Manufacturing Broad Lane, Gilberdyke, HU15 2TS Marshall Quarry Products Ltd SE916 327 Cement Batching Plant Station Yard, South Cave, HU15 2AA Proposed Installations: None

East Riding of Yorkshire Council has assessed new/proposed industrial installations, and concluded that it will not be necessary to proceed to a Detailed Assessment.

5.1.2 Existing Installations where Emissions have Increased Substantially or New Relevant Exposure has been Introduced

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no industrial installations with substantially increased emissions or new relevant exposure in their vicinity within its area or nearby in a neighbouring authority.

5.1.3 New or Significantly Changed Installations with No Previous Air Quality Assessment

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no new or proposed industrial installations for which planning approval has been granted within its area or nearby in a neighbouring authority.

5.2 Major Fuel (Petrol) Storage Depots

There are no major fuel (petrol) storage depots within the Local Authority area.

1. LAQM USA 2015 62 East Riding of Yorkshire Council 5.3 Petrol Stations

Table 5.2 New Petrol Stations opened since the previous USA in 2012

Name and Address of Grid Reference Type of Installation New Petrol Installation

New Installations Pocklington Services A1079, Pocklington, SE 792 479 Petrol Station YO42 1AD Asda Superstore, Bilton , Hull, TA 154 326 Petrol Station HU11 4AL Tesco Stores Ltd Southgate, Hornsea, TA 203 470 Petrol Station HU18 1RE

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no new petrol stations meeting the specified criteria.

5.4 Poultry Farms

New or proposed or substantially changed poultry farms identified since the previous Updating and Screening Assessment are detailed in Table 5.3. For substantially changed installations where the number of places for poultry has increased or is proposed to increase, the original capacity is shown in brackets below the new or proposed figure.

Table 5.3 Individual Poultry Units since the previous USA in 2012. Distance to Name & Address of Grid No. of Ventilation Relevant Type Poultry Unit Reference Places Method Exposure (m) New Installations Wot-an-Egg Co Ltd Barmby Moor Farm, SE 756 483 Layers 54,000 Mechanical 400 Barmby Moor, YO42 4DB Decoy Farm Scorborough, TA 035 461 Broilers 60,000 Mechanical 250 Driffield, YO25 9BB Crossroads Farming Ltd TA 103 525 Broilers 140,000 Mechanical 400 North Frodingham, Driffield, YO25 8LP

1. LAQM USA 2015 63 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Distance to Name & Address of Grid No. of Ventilation Relevant Type Poultry Unit Reference Places Method Exposure (m) New Installations K Fresh Ltd Carr Farm,Rimswell, TA 306 291 Layers 546,000 Mechanical 275 HU19 2BZ PJ Oliver & Sons Woodhouse Farm, TA 124 368 Broilers 185,000 Mechanical 400 Swine, HU11 4JH Bell Mills Farm Skerne Road, TA 285 632 Layers 55,000 Mechanical 400 Driffield, YO25 6XN Westfield Farm Sigglesthorne, Hull, TA 137 456 Broilers 132,000 Mechanical 100 HU11 5QI 2 Agricultrure Ltd Spaldington Airfield, SE 767 321 Broilers 340,000 Mechanical 280 DN14 7NG Blackthorne Poultry Farm SE 752 506 Broilers 110,000 Mechanical 450 Wilberfoss, YO41 5NX Burnby Farms Marlborough House SE 832 469 Ducks 58,000 Mechanical 650 Duck Farm, Burnby, YO41 1RS Cranberry Foods Ltd TA 135 481 Broilers 429,702 Mechanical 1,000 Catfoss Airfield, YO25 8EJ Ruston Farm Eggs Ruston Parva, TA 067 617 Layers 53,400 Mechanical 180 Driffield, YO25 4DG Free Range Chicken Ltd TA 171 347 Broilers 69,271 Mechanical 250 Thirtleby, Hull, HU11 4LL Warrendale Farms Ltd SE 999 649 Broilers 128,000 Mechanical 540 Cottam, YO25 3BY Substantially Changed Installations Park Farm 315,000 Holme on Spalding SE 816 395 Broilers Mechanical 450 (180,000) Moor, YO43 4AG

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no poultry farms meeting the specified criteria.

1. LAQM USA 2015 64 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

6 Commercial and Domestic Sources 6.1 Biomass Combustion – Individual Installations

Planning permission has been approved for the following installation where it is proposed to burn biomass in plant with net rated thermal input (NRTI) exceeding 50kW (see Table 6.1).

Table 6.1 Individual Biomass-Burning Installations

Name & Address of Grid Capacity Air Quality Regulatory Fuel Type Installation Reference (KW) Assessment Regime

Old Mill Hotel Mill Lane Virgin Wood/ TA 009 667 90 Yes None Langtoft Pellets YO25 3BQ Ryehill Country Lodge TA 221 258 Virgin Wood 95 Yes None Pit Lane, Ryehill HU12 9NN Kitchen Gardens South Dalton Hall SE 955 451 Virgin Wood 200 Yes None Park Road HU17 7PW White Rose Lodge Care Home 2 Limekiln Lane TA 192 679 Pellets 90 Yes None Bridlington YO15 2LY East End Nurseries Clean Wood Keyingham, HU12 TA 252 251 1200 Yes Part B Chip 9RX HMP Full Sutton The Airfield SE 750 541 Pellets 2000 Yes None Common Lane Full Sutton

Satisfactorily robust Air Quality Assessment has been undertaken for each of these proposed plants. In each case it has been concluded that the operation will not have a significant impact on local air quality and is unlikely to lead to an exceedence of any relevant air quality objective.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council has assessed the biomass combustion plant, and concluded that it will not be necessary to proceed to a Detailed Assessment.

1. LAQM USA 2015 65 East Riding of Yorkshire Council 6.2 Biomass Combustion – Combined Impacts

East Riding of Yorkshire is predominantly rural, with well over half the population residing in rural communities, many of which are small, scattered and geographically isolated. Consequently, population (and, hence, housing) density across much of the area is low and whilst some wood combustion takes place, domestic PM10 emissions do not meet the specified criteria.

Previous assessment has identified a low incidence of solid fuel combustion (including biomass) within the main urban population centres, the majority of residential and commercial premises being fuelled by gas.

6.3 Domestic Solid-Fuel Burning

East Riding of Yorkshire is predominantly rural, with well over half the population residing in rural communities, many of which are small, scattered and geographically isolated. Consequently, population (and, hence, housing) density across much of the area is low and domestic PM10 and SO2 emissions do not meet the specified criteria.

Previous rounds of review and assessment have identified a low incidence of solid fuel combustion within the main urban population centres, the majority of residential and commercial premises fuelled by gas. No significant change affecting any relevant 500m x 500m grid has since been identified.

East Riding of Yorkshire Council confirms that there are no areas of significant domestic fuel use in the Local Authority area.

1. LAQM USA 2015 66 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

7 Fugitive or Uncontrolled Sources

Previous rounds of review and assessment have considered PM10 emissions from fugitive and uncontrolled sources. No additional sources likely to give rise to significant dust emissions, or additional relevant exposure to any existing sources, have been subsequently identified.

East Riding of Yorkshire confirms that there are no potential sources of fugitive particulate matter emissions in the Local Authority area.

1. LAQM USA 2015 67 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

8 Conclusions and Proposed Actions 8.1 Conclusions from New Monitoring Data

Four diffusion tubes recorded bias-adjusted annual mean NO2 concentrations exceeding the 40µg/m3 air quality objective:

Tube No.9 (No.163 Keldgate, Beverley) - 44 µg/m3

Tube No.20 (No.30 Front Street, Middleton-on-the-Wolds) –44 µg/m3

Tube No.28 (A63/Gibson Lane North, Welton) –53 µg/m3

Tube No.72 (A63 West (Melton grange), Melton) –43 µg/m3

Tube No.9. After 12 years of co-location with a (now decommissioned) reference method analyser at the junction of Admiral Walker Road and Keldgate in Beverley, Tube No 9 was relocated across the road (No.163 Keldgate) in 2013. The tube 3 recorded an annual mean NO2 concentration of 44g/m for 2014, having previously recorded a 12-year average annual mean concentration of 30.5gm-3 prior to relocation. The Beverley Southern Relief Road (BSRR) was opened in March 2015. Proposals for the new road were originally reported in the 2004 Progress Report; it has been specifically designed to divert traffic away from Beverley town centre, with Keldgate predicted to benefit from an estimated 60% reduction. The addition of a proposed park and ride scheme, located on the outskirts of Beverley, will see further reductions in through-town traffic in coming years. Monitoring at this location will continue for the foreseeable future and the results published and discussed in future reports.

Tube No.20. Deployed at its current location outside No.45 Front Street since 2012. After having recorded an exceedence (43g/m3) of the annual mean objective in 2011, it was relocated from its previous position (outside No.30 Front Street) in order to give a better representation of relevant exposure. This latest monitoring location is at the kerbside of the A614 as it passes through the village of Middleton–on-the- Wolds. This is the main route connecting the coastal resort of Bridlington with the M62 motorway and A1079 Hull to York trunk road. The tube recorded an annual 3 3 mean NO2 concentration of 44g/m in 2014 (41g/m in both 2012 and 2013). When subjected to the “fall-off with distance” calculator the predicted annual mean NO2 concentration at the façade of the nearest relevant receptor falls to 35g/m3.

Additional tubes have been deployed along this stretch of road since 2012 to characterise the situation in the village. Tubes No.53 and No.54, located kerbside outside residential properties on Church Hill Road, have returned annual mean NO2 concentrations for 2104 of 39g/m3 and 31g/m3 respectively.

Diffusion tube monitoring continues in Middleton-on-the-Wolds; the results will be reported and discussed in the 2016 Progress Report.

1. LAQM USA 2015 68 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Tubes No.28 and No.72 Located adjacent the A63, the eastern extremity of the M62 motorway and the main route into Hull. Tube No.28 has shown a significant (13%) decrease between 2013 and 2014, with the annual mean NO2 concentration decreasing from 61g/m3 to 53g/m3. However, Tube 72, has shown an annual 3 3 mean NO2 concentration increased by 9% from 39g/m to 43g/m . Neither of these tube locations is representative of public exposure. When subjected to the Defra “NO2 fall-off with distance” calculator the predicted annual mean NO2 concentrations at the nearest, receptor locations for these two tubes fall to 32g/m3 and 35g/m3 respectively.

Monitoring continues at both locations and additional diffusion tubes have been deployed along this stretch of the route at varying distances from the kerb, the results to be reported and discussed in future reports.

8.2 Conclusions from Assessment of Sources

The assessment of new or significantly changed sources has not identified the need to proceed to a Detailed Assessment for any prescribed pollutant. No potential exceedence of a relevant Air Quality Objective as a result of such sources is identified.

Satisfactorily robust air quality assessments have been submitted in relation to all new or proposed industrial sources identified, concluding that each is unlikely to lead to an exceedence of any Air Quality Objective.

No significant changes affecting other transport related sources or commercial, domestic or fugitive emissions have been identified by the assessment.

8.3 Proposed Actions

The Updating and Screening Assessment has not identified the need to proceed to a Detailed Assessment for any Pollutant in relation to any Air Quality Objective.

As reported in 8.1 above, additional diffusion tubes have been deployed along Front Street, Middleton-on-the-Wolds to better characterise any potential impact on annual mean NO2 concentrations at relevant receptor locations resulting from traffic flows along the A614. Assessment of the results to determine whether the recorded exceedences are representative of a sustained increase in NO2 concentration requiring the Council to proceed to a Detailed Assessment will be discussed in subsequent reports.

The Council’s next course of action will be to submit an Annual Progress Report in 2016.

1. LAQM USA 2015 69 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

9 References

Air Quality (England) Regulations 2000. Stationery Office. 2000

Air Quality – Review and Assessment Stage 1. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 1999

Air Quality – Review and Assessment Stage 2 & 3. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2001

Air Quality - Second Round Review and Assessment - Updating and Screening Assessment 2003. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2003

Air Quality – Second Round Review and Assessment – Progress Report 2004. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2004

Air Quality – Second Round Review and Assessment – Progress Report 2005. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2005

Air Quality - Third Round Review and Assessment - Updating and Screening Assessment 2006. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2006

Air Quality - Third Round Review and Assessment – Progress Report 2007. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2007

Air Quality – Third Round Review and Assessment – Progress Report 2008. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2008

Air Quality - Fourth Round Review and Assessment - Updating and Screening Assessment 2009. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2009

Air Quality - Fourth Round Review and Assessment – Progress Report 2010. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2010

Air Quality - Fourth Round Review and Assessment – Progress Report 2011. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2011

Air Quality - Fifth Round Review and Assessment - Updating & Screening Assessment 2012. East Riding of Yorkshire Council. 2012

Environment Act 1995

Local Air Quality Management: Policy Guidance LAQM. PG(03). Defra 2003

Local Air Quality Management: Technical Guidance LAQM. TG(03). Defra 2003

Local Air Quality Management: Technical Guidance LAQM. TG(09). Defra 2009

1. LAQM USA 2015 70 East Riding of Yorkshire Council

Appendix A: QA/QC Data

Factor from Local Co-location Studies (if available) Diffusion Tube Bias Adjustment Factors

Tubes supplied and analysed under contract by Environmental Scientifics Group (ESG Didcot) are prepared using the 50% TEA in Acetone method, in accordance with procedures set out in the Harmonisation Practical Guidance.

The reported adjustment factor for ESG Didcot in 2014 is (0.81) (see Fig A1).

Figure A1. Summary of 2014 precision results and bias adjustment factors (ESG Didcot)

This laboratory participates in the WASP/ AIR PT Scheme for nitrogen dioxide tube analysis and the Annual Field Inter-Comparison Exercise. These provide strict performance criteria for participating laboratories to meet and the period January 2014 to December 2014, ESG achieved 100% (Fig.A2). Tubes are replaced in compliance with the National Timetable.

1. LAQM USA 2015 71 East Riding of Yoorkshire Council

Fig A2. Summary of laboratory performance for the WASP / AIR PT scheme for analysis of NO2 diffusion tubes (April 2013 to February 20115)

1. LAQM USA 2015 72