DOCSLIB.ORG

EPSRC Review of Mathematical Sciences Infrastructure

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EPSRC Review of Mathematical Sciences Infrastructure EPSRC Review of Mathematical Sciences Infrastructure Review Working Group Professor Alan Champneys, University of Bristol Professor Ken Brown, University of Glasgow Professor Paul Milewski, University of Bath Dr Richard Pinch, GCHQ Professor Sofia Olhede, UCL EPSRC support for the review: Dr Christopher White, Dr Philippa Hemmings, Dr Laura Watkin, Dr Michael Ward, Dr Katharine Moore, Mr David O’Gorman Summary In 2014 a group was set up consisting of a subset of the Mathematical Sciences Theme Strategic Advisory Team and other relevant experts in the area to review the current UK mathematical sciences infrastructure. Throughout the evidence gathering stages of the review the working definition of mathematical sciences infrastructure was given as the following: “Longer-term funding to enable collaboration and development of interconnections of the mathematical sciences community, current existing examples include but are not limited to the Isaac Newton Institute, LMS-Durham Symposium and Taught Course centres. Past examples include the Study Groups with Industry.” The definition was purposefully broad to encourage a broad response to the survey questions. However currently, and over the period of the review, EPSRC funds four activities which are considered infrastructure in this context and form the focus of this review: Isaac Newton Institute International Centre for Mathematical Sciences Durham Symposia Warwick Symposium The main recommendations of the report are: 1. Mathematical infrastructure is fundamentally important for mathematical sciences research and should continue to be supported broadly at the current level. 2. The Isaac Newton Institute and International Centre for Mathematical Sciences are highly regarded and highly important activities which offer a suitable variety of high quality scientific and knowledge exchange activities. 3. We would like the funding for the named symposiums to achieve a more dynamic broader approach and to encourage more flexibility (e.g. length of activity and geographical 1 location). We would encourage more ambition, breadth and diversity, and a well-defined, consistent and well-advertised mechanism for funding these symposia. 4. Aspects of the current models which could be improved include support for the talent pipeline and better engagement with early career researchers, as hinted by the survey. Infrastructure facilities should have the explicit aim of improving diversity in participation, for example the current average female participation rate of 16% should be significantly increased. 5. The balance of longer term and shorter term programmes needs to be considered systemically and be effectively managed at the UK level. 6. If additional funding were available then a retreat in the style of Oberwolfach would be encouraged, but not at the expense of the current infrastructure in the UK. 7. EPSRC should consider options for how mathematical infrastructure is funded in the future whilst taking the above points into consideration. Introduction The review was initiated by a meeting of a sub group of the Strategic Advisory Team in June 2014 to discuss the value of mathematical sciences infrastructure to the UK. It became apparent that there had been no recent review or collective assessment of the mathematical sciences infrastructure in the UK. This meant that there were no specific indicators of the quality, importance and impact of the investment. Without this evidence it would be difficult to make informed strategic decisions on future investments. The review was initiated and the working group’s membership was expanded to better reflect the expertise supported by the Mathematical Sciences Theme, from the initial Strategic Advisory Team members, to include Professor Sofia Olhede. The review was carried out by EPSRC staff across several work streams and the synthesis of these was presented to the working group on the 29th June 2015. The data presented, conclusions and recommendations from this meeting are found within this document and the Annex. Methodology The meeting of the sub group of the Strategic Advisory Team in June 2014 identified four major themes to focus the review. What are the best ways to support connectivity/interactions across the mathematical sciences, and connections between mathematical sciences and other areas of science and engineering? What is the current portfolio/landscape of connectivity/interaction activities in the mathematical sciences in the UK? What models might exist for the longer term benefit of the UK? What does success look like; and how do we measure it? 2 Following this initial meeting EPSRC carried out an options analysis for delivering the review. This was then presented to the Review Working Group, which met for the first time in December 2014. The decision was made to progress to an evidence gathering phase to address questions posed across several strands. The group met again to discuss the findings and make recommendations. The final meeting of the working group was on 29th June 2015 and following this, the draft conclusions and recommendations were shared with the broader Mathematical Sciences Theme Strategic Advisory Team in July 2015. The conclusions and recommendations were agreed; these are published in this document together with supporting data. 3 Explanation of the data and the information supplied to the working group The following describes the different strands of evidence gathering and explains how this was presented to the working group. Open Community Survey The survey opened on 14th April 2015 and closed on 18th May 2015. The link was publicised on the EPSRC website and in addition was circulated directly to the following groups: Review Working Group EPSRC Mathematical Sciences Strategic Advisory Team UK Heads of Department EPSRC Mathematical Sciences Theme Early Career Forum Council for Mathematical Sciences Annex 4 contains a synthesis of the results of the survey. Overall 256 completed responses were received, as well as 111 blank responses, 138 partially completed responses and 7 duplicate responses. Pro Forma The pro-forma was sent to representatives of the following existing components of the mathematical sciences infrastructure on 9th April 2015, with a deadline for completion of 21st May 2015: Isaac Newton Institute International Centre for Mathematical Sciences Durham Symposia Warwick Symposium Study Groups with Industry Completed pro-forma documents were received from all. These confidential responses are not shared as part of this review. However the questions that were asked can be found in Annex 1. Review of Overseas Infrastructure A desk exercise was completed to provide an overview of comparable mathematical infrastructure found in France, Germany, Canada and USA. The results are presented in Annex 3. Summary of Current EPSRC Mathematical Sciences Infrastructure Annex 2 outlines the last 10 years of funding for each component of the EPSRC mathematical sciences infrastructure. It also gives some information regarding which panels considered the more recent grants, and includes a diagram of when the current grants finish. 4 Conclusions and recommendations of the working group Conclusions 1. Mathematical sciences Infrastructure has been shown to be of great importance to UK Mathematics – it acts much like infrastructure features (labs etc) of other disciplines, in that it facilitates the creation of new mathematics & also is a vital mechanism for bringing together mathematical sciences and other disciplines. This is a core mechanism for linking mathematicians across the subfields of mathematical sciences, and also for connecting mathematical scientists with those working in other fields, including government and industry. 2. The EPSRC funded infrastructure is in two clear categories: The International Centre for Mathematical Sciences and the Isaac Newton Institute show clear, broad and deep engagement of and with the community as a whole, and an appropriate framework for broader impact. With regard to the named symposia, Durham and Warwick, the degree of competitive testing of the delivered activities, and the range of potential activities from which they were selected, were not consonant with the level of Research Council funding being committed to them. Future funding for any such activities would benefit from more competitive tensioning against a wider selection of competing bids. 3. The primary aims of the Taught Course Centres relate to training rather than research and so were deemed out of scope for this review. 4. The Study Groups with Industry are not currently EPSRC funded. These are widely recognised as being valuable for industrial engagement with the mathematical sciences and for student training. There is only anecdotal evidence on the value of this activity for the generation of new mathematics and it was felt that more work is required to make the case for the benefits of the Study Groups to the core mathematical sciences community. 5. This review did not cover the Alan Turing Institute nor the Heilbronn Institute. These are considered as important parts of the research infrastructure landscape. 6. Given the challenging funding landscape, the amount of spend is felt to be about right (as a proportion of the budget of mathematical sciences at EPSRC). There are examples of good practice of bringing in matched funding of up to 100%. 7. The current balance of longer to shorter programmes would benefit from careful consideration. There is perhaps a need for more shorter
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Address: University of St Andrews, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Mathematical Institute, North Haugh, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom
    DAVID REES JONES Address: University of St Andrews, School of Mathematics and Statistics, Mathematical Institute, North Haugh, St Andrews, Scotland, United Kingdom. Website: https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/profile/dwrj1 Email: [email protected] ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-401X POSITIONS 2019–: Lecturer in Applied Mathematics, School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews. 2016–2019: Postdoctoral researcher in subduction-zone geodynamics, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Oxford (2016–2018). Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge (2019). Advised by Professor Richard Katz and Dr John Rudge (Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge). 2014–2016: Postdoctoral researcher on the fluid dynamics of frazil-ice crystals, Department of Physics, University of Oxford. Advised by Dr Andrew Wells. 2014–2019: College tutor, Department of Physics, University of Oxford St Anne’s College (2014–2019) and Hertford College (2015–2016). EDUCATION 2010–2013: PhD, Applied Mathematics, University of Cambridge Supervised by Professor Grae Worster. Thesis: The Convective Desalination of Sea Ice (accepted April 2014) Institute of Theoretical Geophysics. Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics (DAMTP). NERC studentship. 2009–2010: MMath (‘Part III’), Distinction, University of Cambridge Essay ‘Global Modes in Shear Flows’ supervised by Professor Nigel Peake. Courses: Geophysical and Environmental Fluid Dynamics, Solidification of Fluids, Slow Viscous Flow, Fluid Dynamics of Energy, and Perturbation and Stability Methods. Not-examined: Polar Oceans and Climate Change, Biological Physics. 2006–2009: BA, First Class Hons., Mathematics, University of Cambridge First class in examinations in each year. PRIZES AND AWARDS 2015: Lighthill-Thwaites Prize finalist. Awarded by the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications (IMA) for a paper in Applied Mathematics within 5 years of first degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Biographies of Candidates 2004
    BRIEF BIOGRAPHIES OF CANDIDATES 2014 Candidate for election as President (1 vacancy) Terry Lyons, Wallis Professor of Mathematics, and Director, Oxford-Man Institute for Quantitative Finance, University of Oxford Email: [email protected], [email protected] Home page: http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/people/profiles/terry.lyons PhD: DPhil: University of Oxford 1980 Previous appointments: jr res fell Jesus Coll Oxford 1979-81, Hedrick visiting asst prof UCLA 1981-82, lectr in mathematics Imperial Coll of Sci and Technol London 1981-85; Univ of Edinburgh: Colin MacLaurin prof of mathematics 1985-93, head Dept of Mathematics and Statistics 1988-91; prof of mathematics Imperial Coll of Sci Technol and Med 1993-2000, Wallis prof of mathematics Univ of Oxford 2000-, dir Wales Inst of Mathematical and Computational Sciences 2007-11, dir Oxford-Man Inst Univ of Oxford 2011- Research interests: Stochastic Analysis, Rough Paths, Rough Differential Equations, and the particularly the development of the algebraic, analytic, and stochastic methodologies appropriate to describing the interactions within high dimensional and highly oscillatory systems. Applications of this mathematics (for example – in finance). LMS service: President, President Designate 2012-2014; Vice-President 2000-2002; Prizes Committee 1998, 2001 and 2002; Publications Committee 2002; Programme Committee 2002; LMS editorial advisor (10 years). Additional Information: sr fell EPSRC 1993-98, fell Univ of Aberystwyth 2010, fell Univ of Cardiff 2012; Rollo Davidson Prize 1985, Whitehead Prize London Mathematical Soc 1986, Polya Prize London Mathematical Soc 2000, European Research Cncl Advanced Grant 2011; Docteur (hc) Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse 2007; FRSE 1987, FRSA 1990, FIMA 1991, FRS 2002, FIMS 2004, FLSW 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Economics - B.S
    College of Mathematical Economics - B.S. Arts and Sciences The mathematical economics major offers students a degree program that combines College Requirements mathematics, statistics, and economics. In today’s increasingly complicated international I. Foreign Language (placement exam recommended) ........................................... 0-14 business world, a strong preparation in the fundamentals of both economics and II. Disciplinary Requirements mathematics is crucial to success. This degree program is designed to prepare a student a. Natural Science .............................................................................................3 to go directly into the business world with skills that are in high demand, or to go on b. Social Science (completed by Major Requirements) to graduate study in economics or finance. A degree in mathematical economics would, c. Humanities ....................................................................................................3 for example, prepare a student for the beginning of a career in operations research or III. Laboratory or Field Work........................................................................................1 actuarial science. IV. Electives ..................................................................................................................6 120 hours (minimum) College Requirement hours: ..........................................................13-27 Any student earning a Bachelor of Science (BS) degree must complete a minimum of 60 hours in natural,
    [Show full text]
  • Priorities for the National Science Foundation
    December 2020 Priorities for the National Science Foundation Founded in 1888, the American Mathematical Society (AMS) is dedicated to advancing the interests of mathematical research and scholarship and connecting the diverse global mathematical community. We do this through our book and journal publications, meetings and conferences, database of research publications1 that goes back to the early 1800s, professional services, advocacy, and awareness programs. The AMS has 30,000 individual members worldwide and supports mathemat- ical scientists at every career stage. The AMS advocates for increased and sustained funding for the National Science Foundation (NSF). The applications The NSF supports more fundamental research in the of advances in mathematical sciences—and done at colleges and theoretical science, 2 universities—than any other federal agency. A signif- including theory of icant increase in Congressional appropriations would mathe matics, occur help address the effects of years of high-quality grant on a time scale that proposals that go unfunded due to limited funding. means the investment Those unmet needs continue. A 2019 National Science Board report3 stated that in fiscal year 2018, “approxi- is often hard to justify mately $3.4 billion was requested for declined proposals in the short run. that were rated Very Good or higher in the merit review process.” This accounts for about 5440 declined proposals at the NSF. The U.S. is leaving potentially transformative scientific research unfunded, while other countries are making significant investments. In the next section we give an overview of our two priorities. The second, and final section offers a discussion of existing funding mechanisms for mathematicians.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Genealogy of the Oakland University Department Of
    Basilios Bessarion Mystras 1436 Guarino da Verona Johannes Argyropoulos 1408 Università di Padova 1444 Academic Genealogy of the Oakland University Vittorino da Feltre Marsilio Ficino Cristoforo Landino Università di Padova 1416 Università di Firenze 1462 Theodoros Gazes Ognibene (Omnibonus Leonicenus) Bonisoli da Lonigo Angelo Poliziano Florens Florentius Radwyn Radewyns Geert Gerardus Magnus Groote Università di Mantova 1433 Università di Mantova Università di Firenze 1477 Constantinople 1433 DepartmentThe Mathematics Genealogy Project of is a serviceMathematics of North Dakota State University and and the American Statistics Mathematical Society. Demetrios Chalcocondyles http://www.mathgenealogy.org/ Heinrich von Langenstein Gaetano da Thiene Sigismondo Polcastro Leo Outers Moses Perez Scipione Fortiguerra Rudolf Agricola Thomas von Kempen à Kempis Jacob ben Jehiel Loans Accademia Romana 1452 Université de Paris 1363, 1375 Université Catholique de Louvain 1485 Università di Firenze 1493 Università degli Studi di Ferrara 1478 Mystras 1452 Jan Standonck Johann (Johannes Kapnion) Reuchlin Johannes von Gmunden Nicoletto Vernia Pietro Roccabonella Pelope Maarten (Martinus Dorpius) van Dorp Jean Tagault François Dubois Janus Lascaris Girolamo (Hieronymus Aleander) Aleandro Matthaeus Adrianus Alexander Hegius Johannes Stöffler Collège Sainte-Barbe 1474 Universität Basel 1477 Universität Wien 1406 Università di Padova Università di Padova Université Catholique de Louvain 1504, 1515 Université de Paris 1516 Università di Padova 1472 Università
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical Genealogy of the Wellesley College Department Of
    Nilos Kabasilas Mathematical Genealogy of the Wellesley College Department of Mathematics Elissaeus Judaeus Demetrios Kydones The Mathematics Genealogy Project is a service of North Dakota State University and the American Mathematical Society. http://www.genealogy.math.ndsu.nodak.edu/ Georgios Plethon Gemistos Manuel Chrysoloras 1380, 1393 Basilios Bessarion 1436 Mystras Johannes Argyropoulos Guarino da Verona 1444 Università di Padova 1408 Cristoforo Landino Marsilio Ficino Vittorino da Feltre 1462 Università di Firenze 1416 Università di Padova Angelo Poliziano Theodoros Gazes Ognibene (Omnibonus Leonicenus) Bonisoli da Lonigo 1477 Università di Firenze 1433 Constantinople / Università di Mantova Università di Mantova Leo Outers Moses Perez Scipione Fortiguerra Demetrios Chalcocondyles Jacob ben Jehiel Loans Thomas à Kempis Rudolf Agricola Alessandro Sermoneta Gaetano da Thiene Heinrich von Langenstein 1485 Université Catholique de Louvain 1493 Università di Firenze 1452 Mystras / Accademia Romana 1478 Università degli Studi di Ferrara 1363, 1375 Université de Paris Maarten (Martinus Dorpius) van Dorp Girolamo (Hieronymus Aleander) Aleandro François Dubois Jean Tagault Janus Lascaris Matthaeus Adrianus Pelope Johann (Johannes Kapnion) Reuchlin Jan Standonck Alexander Hegius Pietro Roccabonella Nicoletto Vernia Johannes von Gmunden 1504, 1515 Université Catholique de Louvain 1499, 1508 Università di Padova 1516 Université de Paris 1472 Università di Padova 1477, 1481 Universität Basel / Université de Poitiers 1474, 1490 Collège Sainte-Barbe
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical and Physical Sciences
    Overview of the Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences NSF Grants Conference Hosted by George Washington University Arlington, VA, October 6-7, 2014 Bogdan Mihaila, [email protected] Program Director Division of Physics US Government NSF Vision and Goals Vision » A Nation that creates and exploits new concepts in science and engineering and provides global leadership in research and education Mission » To promote the progress of science; to advance the national health, prosperity, and welfare; to secure the national defense Strategic Goals » Transform the frontiers of science and engineering » Stimulate innovation and address societal needs through research & education » Excel as a Federal Science Agency NSF in a Nutshell Independent agency to support basic research & education Grant mechanism in two forms: » Unsolicited, curiosity driven (the majority of the $) » Solicited, more focused All fields of science/engineering Merit review: Intellectual Merit & Broader Impacts Discipline-based structure, some cross-disciplinary Support large facilities NSF Organization Chart Office of Diversity & National Science Board Director Inclusion (ODI) (NSB) Deputy Director Office of the General Counsel (OGC) Office of the NSB Office Office of International & Inspector General $482M (OIG) ($4.3M) Integrative Activities (OIIA) ($14.2M) Office of Legislative & Public Affairs (OLPA) Computer & Mathematical Biological Information Engineering Geosciences & Physical Sciences Science & (ENG) (GEO) Sciences (BIO) Engineering (MPS) (CISE)
    [Show full text]
  • 1 David James Wallace
    DAVID JAMES WALLACE Personal Data Born 7th October 1945, Hawick, Scotland. Married to Elizabeth; one daughter, Sara. 19, Buckingham Terrace, Edinburgh EH3 4AD [email protected] Previous employment Oct 2006 – Sep 2014 Master, Churchill College, Cambridge Oct 2006 – Sep 2011 Director, Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences; and NM Rothschild & Sons Professor of Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge Jan 1994 – Dec 2005 Vice-Chancellor, Loughborough University Apr 2000 – May 2004 Non-executive director, Taylor & Francis Group plc Oct 2001 - Feb 2004 Non-executive director, UK e-Universities Worldwide Ltd July 1999 - June 2001 Non-executive director, The Scottish Life Assurance Company Oct 1979 - Dec 1993 Tait Professor of Mathematical Physics, University of Edinburgh Oct 1978 - Sep 1979 Reader, Department of Physics, University of Southampton Oct 1972 - Sep l978 Lecturer, as above Sep 1970 - July 1972 Harkness Fellow, Department of Physics, Princeton University Qualifications and Registrations Nov 1995 - Nov 1997 Institute of Directors, Diploma in Company Direction 1994 Engineering Council, Chartered Engineer 1993 Institute of Physics, Chartered Physicist Oct 1967 - Aug 1970 University of Edinburgh, Ph.D. Thesis on Applications of Current Algebras and Chiral Symmetry Breaking Oct 1963 - June 1967 University of Edinburgh, B.Sc. with First Class Honours in Mathematical Physics Distinctions Honorary Vice-President for Life, Churchill College Association 2014 Named Lecture in Mathematics “Sir David Wallace”, Loughborough
    [Show full text]
  • Newton Institute Inaugurated
    Newton Institute Encyclopedia Inaugurated Just over three years ago Trinity College in Cambridge, the college of Isaac Newton, offered money to help set up the national Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences. St John’s College, the of Applied college of Paul Dirac, had already offered to provide a building. At Physics the inauguration of the Institute on 3 July, the Masters of the two Edited by George L. Trigg 13 APRIL-23 APRIL 1993 GEILO, NORWAY NATO ADVANCED STUDY INSTITUTE The 20-volume Encyclopedia of Applied Physics is the first ON work of its kind to approach physics from the standpoint of technical and industrial applications. PHASE TRANSITIONS AND RELAXATION IN SYSTEMS WITH COMPETING ENERGY SCALES Alphabetical coverage ensures that all aspects of applied physics are covered in depth. They include measurement Topics of lectures - critical fields - melting science, the electronic, magnetic, dielectric, and optical - critical dynamics - phase slip properties of condensed matter, materials science, atomic - entanglement - pinning and molecular physics, nuclear and elementary particle - instability - supercooling physics, biophysics, geophysics, space physics... - levitation - vortices Topics will cover both theory, experiments and laboratory Sponsored by the demonstrations. Open to participants from all countries. American Institute of Deadline for application: January 15th, 1993. Physics, the German Encyclopedia Information: Gerd Jarrett, Dept. of Physics, Institutt for Physical Society, the energiteknikk, POB 40, N-2007 Kjeller, Norway. Japanese Society of of Applied Telephone: +47 (6) 80 60 75; Fax: +47 (6) 81 09 20; Applied Physics and the Physics e-mail: gerd @ barney.ife.no Physical Society of Japan. Subscribe and save 19% L’Ecole Subscription price: DM 350.00 per volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Michaelmas Term 2002 Special No.6 Part I
    2 OFFICERS NUMBER–MICHAELMAS TERM 2002 SPECIAL NO.6 PART I Chancellor: H.R.H. The Prince PHILIP, Duke of Edinburgh, T Vice-Chancellor: 1996, Prof. Sir Alec BROERS, CHU, 2003 Deputy Vice-Chancellors: for 2002–2003: A. M. LONSDALE, NH,M.J.GRANT, CL,O.S.O’NEILL, N, Sir ROGER TOMKYS, PEM,D.E.NEWLAND, SE,S.G.FLEET, DOW,G.JOHNSON, W Pro-Vice-Chancellors: 1998, A. M. LONSDALE, NH, 30 June 2004 2001, M. GRANT, CL, 31 Dec. 2004 High Steward: 2001, Dame BRIDGET OGILVIE, G Deputy High Steward: 1983, The Rt Hon. Lord RICHARDSON, CAI Commissary: 2002, Lord MACKAY, T Proctors for 2002–2003: J. D. M ACDONALD, CAI Deputy: D. J. CHIVERS, SE T. N. M ILNER, PET Deputy: V.E. IZZET, CHR Orator: 1993, A. J. BOWEN, JE Registrary: 1997, T. J. MEAD, W Deputy Registrary: 1993, N. J. B. A. BRANSON, DAR Secretary General of the Faculties: 1992, D. A. LIVESEY, EM Treasurer: 1993, J. M. WOMACK, TH Librarian: 1994, P.K. FOX, SE Deputy Librarians: 1996, D. J. HALL, W 2000, A. MURRAY, W Director of the Fitzwilliam Museum and Marlay Curator: 1995, D. D. ROBINSON, M Development Director: 2002, P.AGAR, SE Esquire Bedells: 1996, J. P.EMMINES, PET 1997, J. H. WILLIAMS, HH University Advocate: 1999, N. M. PADFIELD, F, 2003 Deputy University Advocate: 1999, P.J. ROGERSON, CAI, 2003 OFFICERS IN INSTITUTIONS PLACED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE GENERAL BOARD PROFESSORS Accounting Vacant Aeronautical Engineering, Francis Mond 1996 W.N. DAWES, CHU Aerothermal Technology 2000 H. P.HODSON, G African Archaeology 2001 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematical and Physical Sciences
    DIRECTORATE FOR MATHEMATICAL AND $1,255,820,000 PHYSICAL SCIENCES (MPS) -$247,590,000 / -16.5% MPS Funding (Dollars in Millions) Change over FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2018 Actual Actual (TBD) Request Amount Percent Astronomical Sciences (AST) $311.16 - $217.08 -$94.08 -30.2% Chemistry (CHE) 246.29 - 214.18 -32.11 -13.0% Materials Research (DMR) 337.14 - 273.78 -63.36 -18.8% Mathematical Sciences (DMS) 237.69 - 203.26 -34.43 -14.5% Physics (PHY) 310.75 - 247.50 -63.25 -20.4% Office of Multidisciplinary Activities (OMA) 60.39 - 100.02 39.63 65.6% Total $1,503.41 - $1,255.82 -$247.59 -16.5% About MPS The MPS FY 2020 Request builds on past efforts and aligns with NSF priorities for FY 2020. The programs in MPS span from individual investigator awards to large, multi-user facilities. MPS-funded science spans an enormous range as well: from the smallest objects and shortest times ever studied to distances and times that are the size and age of the universe. Individual investigators and small teams receive most awards, but centers, institutes, and facilities are all integral to MPS-funded research. The MPS FY 2020 Request is influenced by four key priorities: (1) sustaining core research programs, (2) supporting the highest priority facilities, (3) supporting early-career investigators, and (4) providing funding for targeted basic research in NSF-Wide Investments, including the NSF Big Ideas. MPS continues to support its core areas of science (astronomical sciences, chemistry, materials research, mathematical sciences, and physics) as well as thet next generation of scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Brochure on Careers in Applied Mathematics
    careers in applied mathematics Options for STEM Majors society for industrial and applied mathematics 2 / careers in applied mathematics Mathematics and computational science are utilized in almost every discipline of science, engineering, industry, and technology. New application areas are WHERE CAN YOU WHAT KINDS OF PROBLEMS MIGHT YOU WORK ON? constantly being discovered MAKE AN IMPACT? While careers in mathematics may differ widely by discipline while established techniques Many different types and job title, one thing remains constant among them— are being applied in new of organizations hire problem solving. Some potential problems that someone with ways and in emerging fields. mathematicians and mathematical training might encounter are described below. Consequently, a wide variety computational scientists. Which of them do you find most intriguing, and why? of career opportunities You can easily search the • How can an airline use smarter scheduling to reduce costs of are open to people with websites of organizations and aircraft parking and engine maintenance? Or smarter pricing mathematical talent and corporations that interest to maximize profit? training. you to learn more about their • How can one design a detailed plan for a clinical trial? Building such a plan requires advanced statistical skills and In this guide, you will find answers to sophisticated knowledge of the design of experiments. questions about careers in applied mathematics • Is ethanol a viable solution for the world’s dependence and computational science, and profiles on fossil fuels? Can biofuel production be optimized to of professionals working in a variety of combat negative implications on the world’s economy and environment? environments for which a strong background • How do we use major advances in computing power to in mathematics is necessary for success.
    [Show full text]