DOCSLIB.ORG

Outcomes of Paediatric Drug Development from a Labeling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Outcomes of Paediatric Drug Development from a Labeling Paediatric Drug Development from a Labeling Perspective A detailed view on the European Summary of Product Characteristics with an exemplary comparison to the US Prescribing Information Wissenschaftliche Prüfungsarbeit zur Erlangung des Titels „Master of Drug Regulatory Affairs“ der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn vorgelegt von Dr. Niklas Jänich aus Koblenz Bonn 2016 Abstract 2 Betreuer und 1. Referent: Dr. Birka Lehmann Zweiter Referent: Prof. Dr. Barbara Sickmüller Abstract 3 Abstract Triggered by legislative initiatives in the European Union and the United States in the last decade, pharmaceutical companies had to increase their efforts to investigate medicinal products also in the paediatric population. Therefore today’s drug development processes are accompanied with the assessment of possibilities for a therapeutic use in the paediatric population. This Master thesis aims to systematically investigate how the considerations related to paediatric development are translated into European prescribing information documents, i.e. Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), and what information is finally communicated to health care professionals via this medium. In order to achieve this, qualitative and quantitative criteria were established to associate information from SmPC documents with aspects relevant for the paediatric population. These criteria were then applied to a robust sample of SmPCs to yield over 600 datasets that were the basis for further analyses. The results of these analyses revealed a very clear picture on what information is communicated to health care professionals via the SmPCs. Information related to the paediatric population was gained for instance regarding the availability of information, different types of information or age ranges. Furthermore, an exemplary comparison to US prescribing information documents was performed. Table of Contents 4 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................. 3 Table of Contents .............................................................................................. 4 List of Figures ................................................................................................... 6 List of Tables ..................................................................................................... 7 Abbreviations .................................................................................................... 8 1 Introduction and Goal ............................................................................. 9 2 Paediatric legislation and relevant regulatory guidance in the European Union .................................................................................... 11 2.1 Paediatric Regulation1 ............................................................................. 11 2.2 Guideline on Summary of Product Characteristics2 ................................ 12 3 Assessment of Product Information Documents ............................... 16 3.1 5-year report to the European Commission on the experience acquired as a result of the application of the Paediatric Regulation ........ 17 3.2 Sample Determination ............................................................................. 19 3.2.1 Field “Authorisation Status” ..................................................................... 21 3.2.2 Fields “Is Generic” and “Biosimilar” ......................................................... 21 3.2.3 Field “Start of Procedure Date” ............................................................... 22 3.2.4 Field “Multiple Application” ...................................................................... 22 3.2.5 Field “Paediatric indication” ..................................................................... 23 3.2.6 Sample .................................................................................................... 23 3.3 Criteria for SmPC assessment ................................................................ 24 3.3.1 Availability of information with relation to the use in the paediatric population ............................................................................................... 24 3.3.1.1 Scenario 1 .......................................................................................... 25 3.3.1.2 Scenario 2 .......................................................................................... 26 3.3.1.3 Scenario 3 .......................................................................................... 26 3.3.1.4 Scenario 4 .......................................................................................... 26 3.3.2 Types of information on paediatric patients in the SmPC........................ 27 3.3.3 Attribution of age ranges to different pieces of information ..................... 27 3.3.4 Other criteria relevant for the SmPC assessment ................................... 28 3.3.5 Application of the criteria on SmPC documents ...................................... 28 3.4 Results and Discussion of the SmPC assessment ................................. 29 3.4.1 Medicinal products with no paediatric indication ..................................... 29 3.4.1.1 Therapeutic areas .............................................................................. 32 Table of Contents 5 3.4.1.2 Authorisation Date .............................................................................. 36 3.4.1.3 Scenario 2a – No data........................................................................ 37 3.4.1.4 Scenario 2b – Limited data ................................................................. 40 3.4.1.5 Scenario 3a – Should not be used / Scenario 3b – Contraindicated .. 44 3.4.1.6 Scenario 4 – Not relevant ................................................................... 46 3.4.2 Medicinal products with paediatric indication .......................................... 46 3.4.2.1 Availability of information with relation to the use in the paediatric population ............................................................................................... 46 3.4.2.2 Types of information on paediatric patients in the SmPC ................... 50 3.4.2.3 Attribution of age ranges .................................................................... 52 3.4.2.4 Therapeutic areas .............................................................................. 53 3.4.3 Dosage forms/strengths, Multiple indications and Age Ranges for Waivers/Deferrals ................................................................................... 54 3.4.3.1 Dosage forms/strengths ..................................................................... 54 3.4.3.2 Multiple indications ............................................................................. 55 3.4.3.3 Age Ranges for Waivers/Deferrals ..................................................... 55 3.5 Comparison of defined criteria between datasets for orphan medicinal products from the EU SmPC assessment and the corresponding US PI documents .......................................................................................... 56 3.5.1 Sample .................................................................................................... 56 3.5.2 Comparison ............................................................................................. 57 4 Conclusion and Outlook ....................................................................... 59 Annex I: Sample of Medicinal Products ........................................................ 61 Annex II: Detailed results of the EU SmPC assessment .............................. 74 Annex III: Results from the comparison of EU SmPCs and US PIs ............ 99 References ..................................................................................................... 102 List of Figures 6 List of Figures Figure 1: Sample determination ........................................................................ 21 Figure 2: Process for application of the criteria on SmPC documents .............. 28 Figure 3: Scenarios associated with medicinal products with no paediatric indication ................................................................................................ 30 Figure 4: Frequency of different combinations of multiple scenarios per medicinal product ................................................................................... 31 Figure 5: Proportion of scenarios in relation to the year of authorisation .......... 37 Figure 6: Distribution of waivers and deferrals in scenario 2a – no data ........... 39 Figure 7: Types of information provided on the paediatric population for scenario 2b – limited data ....................................................................... 41 Figure 8: Distribution of waivers and deferrals in scenario 2b – limited data ..... 42 Figure 9: Histogram with age distribution related to information from clinical efficacy/safety and pharmacokinetic studies ........................................... 44 Figure 10: Histogram with age distribution for restrictions of use ...................... 45 Figure 11: Scenarios associated to section 4.1 of the SmPC for medicinal products with paediatric indication .......................................................... 48 Figure 12: Scenarios associated to section 4.2 of the SmPC for medicinal products with paediatric indication .........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CP.PMN.158 Netupitant and Palonosetron (Akynzeo)
    Clinical Policy: Netupitant and Palonosetron (Akynzeo), Fosnetupitant and Palonosetron (Akynzeo IV) Reference Number: CP.PMN.158 Effective Date: 09.01.06 Last Review Date: 02.21 Coding Implications Line of Business: HIM, Medicaid Revision Log See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description Netupitant/palonosetron (Akynzeo®) and fosnetupitant/palonosetron are fixed combination products of netupitant, a substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor antagonist, and palonosetron hydrochloride, a serotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonist. FDA Approved Indication(s) Akynzeo capsules are indicated in combination with dexamethasone in adults for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of cancer chemotherapy, including, but not limited to, highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Akynzeo for injection is indicated in combination with dexamethasone in adults for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting associated with initial and repeat courses of highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Policy/Criteria Provider must submit documentation (such as office chart notes, lab results or other clinical information) supporting that member has met all approval criteria. It is the policy of health plans affiliated with Centene Corporation® that Akynzeo is medically necessary when the following criteria are met: I. Initial Approval Criteria A. Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Associated with Cancer Chemotherapy (must meet all): 1. Prescribed for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea/vomiting; 2. Age ≥ 18 years; 3. If request is for Akynzeo capsules, member is scheduled to receive moderately to highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy (see Appendix D); 4. If request is for Akynzeo for injection, member is scheduled to receive highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy (see Appendix D); 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Fosaprepitant Dimeglumine (Emend® for Injection) Prior Authorization Drug Coverage Policy
    1 Fosaprepitant dimeglumine (Emend® for injection) Prior Authorization Drug Coverage Policy Effective Date: 9/1/2020 Revision Date: n/a Review Date: 3/13/20 Lines of Business: Commercial Policy type: Prior Authorization This Drug Coverage Policy provides parameters for the coverage of fosaprepitant dimeglumine. Consideration of medically necessary indications are based upon U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) indications, recommended uses within the Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) five recognized compendia, including the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Drugs & Biologics Compendium (Category 1 or 2A recommendations), and peer-reviewed scientific literature eligible for coverage according to the CMS, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual, Chapter 15, section 50.4.5 titled, “Off-Label Use of Anti-Cancer Drugs and Biologics.” This policy evaluates whether the drug therapy is proven to be effective based on published evidence-based medicine. Drug Description 1 Fosaprepitant is a prodrug of aprepitant and accordingly, its antiemetic effects are attributable to aprepitant. Aprepitant is a selective high-affinity antagonist of human substance P/neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptors. Aprepitant has little or no affinity for serotonin (5-HT3), dopamine, and corticosteroid receptors, the targets of existing therapies for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Aprepitant has been shown in animal models to inhibit emesis induced by cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, such as cisplatin, via central actions. Animal and human Positron Emission Tomography (PET) studies with aprepitant have shown that it crosses the blood brain barrier and occupies brain NK1 receptors. Animal and human studies show that aprepitant augments the antiemetic activity of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonist ondansetron and the corticosteroid dexamethasone and inhibits both the acute and delayed phases of cisplatin- induced emesis.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/048702 Al
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date W O 2017/048702 A l 2 3 March 2017 (23.03.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C07D 487/04 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, A61K 31/519 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, (21) International Application Number: DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, PCT/US20 16/05 1490 HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, (22) International Filing Date: KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, 13 September 2016 (13.09.201 6) MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (25) Filing Language: English SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, (26) Publication Language: English TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (30) Priority Data: 62/218,493 14 September 2015 (14.09.2015) US (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 62/218,486 14 September 2015 (14.09.2015) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (71) Applicant: INFINITY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Protocol
    CADTH Health Technology Assessment June 2016 (Update Drugs for the management of rheumatoid May 2017) arthritis: clinical evaluation – project protocol PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42016041498 1 Cite as: Drugs for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: clinical evaluation – project protocol. Ottawa: CADTH; 2016 Jun; updated 2017 April. This report is prepared by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) in collaboration with the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Drug Safety and Effectiveness Network (DSEN). This report contains a comprehensive review of existing public literature, studies, materials, and other information and documentation (collectively the “source documentation”) available to CADTH at the time it was prepared, and its creation was guided by expert input and advice throughout its preparation. The information in this report is intended to help health care decision-makers, patients, health care professionals, health systems leaders, and policy-makers make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. The information in this report should not be used as a substitute for the application of clinical judgment in respect to the care of a particular patient or other professional judgment in any decision-making process, nor is it intended to replace professional medical advice. While CADTH has taken care in the preparation of this report to ensure that its contents are accurate, complete, and up-to-date, CADTH does not make any guarantee to that effect. CADTH is not responsible for any errors or omissions or injury, loss, or damage arising from or as a result of the use (or misuse) of any information contained in or implied by the information in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterising the Risk of Major Bleeding in Patients With
    EU PE&PV Research Network under the Framework Service Contract (nr. EMA/2015/27/PH) Study Protocol Characterising the risk of major bleeding in patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: non-interventional study of patients taking Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the EU Version 3.0 1 June 2018 EU PAS Register No: 16014 EMA/2015/27/PH EUPAS16014 Version 3.0 1 June 2018 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Title ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2 Marketing authorization holder ................................................................................................. 5 3 Responsible parties ................................................................................................................... 5 4 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 6 5 Amendments and updates ......................................................................................................... 7 6 Milestones ................................................................................................................................. 8 7 Rationale and background ......................................................................................................... 9 8 Research question and objectives .............................................................................................. 9 9 Research methods ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A PILOT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL of DE NOVO BELATACEPT-BASED IMMUNOSUPPRESSION in LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Howard J. Huang, MD Ra
    A PILOT RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF DE NOVO BELATACEPT-BASED IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Howard J. Huang, MD Ramsey R. Hachem, MD Study ID: IM103-387 Draft: v 6.0 Date: 8 December 2017 ! 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1. List of Abbreviations 3 2. Protocol Summary 4 3. Study Schematic 4 4. Key Roles 5 5. Introduction 6 6. Objectives and Purpose 7 7. Study Design and Endpoints 7 8. Study Enrollment 8 9. Study Agent 11 10. Study Procedures and Schedule 11 11. Safety Considerations 13 12. Statistical Considerations 18 13. References 19 ! 2 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ACR Acute Cellular Rejection AE Adverse Event AMR Antibody-Mediated Rejection ATG Anti-Thymocyte Globulin ATS American Thoracic Society BAL Bronchoalveolar Lavage BELA Belatacept BMS Bristol-Myers Squibb BOS Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome CARV Community-Acquired Respiratory Virus/Viral CBC Complete Blood Counts CFR Code of Federal Regulations CIP Cellular Immunophenotyping CKD Chronic Kidney Disease CLAD Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction CMP Comprehensive Metabolic Panel CMV Cytomegalovirus CNI Calcineurin Inhibitor DCC Data Coordinating Center DSA Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies DSMB Data Safety and Monitoring Board EBV Epstein-Barr Virus ECLS Extra-Corporeal Life Support ECMO Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation FOB Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy GCP Good Clinical Practice HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus HLA Human Leukocyte Antigens HSV Herpes Simplex Virus IgG Immunoglobulin G IP Investigational Product IRB Institutional Review Board IS Immunosuppression ISHLT International
    [Show full text]
  • NEPA, a Fixed Oral Combination of Netupitant and Palonosetron
    Support Care Cancer DOI 10.1007/s00520-016-3502-x ORIGINAL ARTICLE NEPA, a fixed oral combination of netupitant and palonosetron, improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) over multiple cycles of chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial versus oral palonosetron Matti Aapro1 & Meinolf Karthaus2 & Lee Schwartzberg3 & Igor Bondarenko4 & Tomasz Sarosiek 5 & Cristina Oprean6 & Servando Cardona-Huerta7 & Vincent Hansen 8 & Giorgia Rossi9 & Giada Rizzi9 & Maria Elisa Borroni9 & Hope Rugo10 Received: 14 May 2016 /Accepted: 25 September 2016 # The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract with oral PALO in a single chemotherapy cycle; maintenance Purpose Antiemetic guidelines recommend co-administration of efficacy/safety over continuing cycles is the objective of this of targeted prophylactic medications inhibiting molecular path- study. ways involved in emesis. NEPA is a fixed oral combination of a Methods This study is a multinational, double-blind study new NK1 receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant (NETU 300 mg), comparing a single oral dose of NEPA vs oral PALO in and palonosetron (PALO 0.50 mg), a pharmacologically dis- chemotherapy-naïve patients receiving anthracycline/ tinct 5-HT3 RA. NEPA showed superior prevention of cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy along with dexa- chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) compared methasone12mg(NEPA)or20mg(PALO)onday1. The primary efficacy endpoint was delayed (25–120 h) A prior publication reported the cycle 1 findings of this study [Aapro complete response (CR: no emesis, no rescue medication) et al., Annals of Oncology 2014 NCT01339260]. This paper focuses on in cycle 1. Sustained efficacy was evaluated during the the findings in the multiple-cycle extension, data which was an oral pre- multicycle extension by calculating the proportion of pa- sentation at both the ASCO and MASCC Annual Meetings in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Suomen Lääketilasto 2019
    SUOMEN LÄÄKETILASTO S LT FINNISH STATISTICS ON MEDICINES FSM 2019 Keskeisiä lukuja lääkkeiden myynnistä ja lääkekorvauksista vuonna 2019 Milj. € Muutos vuodesta 2018, % Lääkkeiden kokonaismyynti 3 460 5,2 avohoidon reseptilääkkeiden myynti (verollisin vähittäismyyntihinnoin) 2 284 4,4 avohoidon itsehoitolääkkeiden myynti (verollisin vähittäismyyntihinnoin) 357 0,8 sairaalamyynti (tukkuohjehinnoin) 818 9,9 Lääkkeistä maksetut korvaukset 1 551 6,2 peruskorvaukset 316 3,0 erityiskorvaukset 1 029 5,2 lisäkorvaukset 205 17,7 Key figures for medicine sales and their reimburssement in 2019 € million Change from 2018, % Total sales of pharmaceuticals 3,460 5.2 prescription medicines in outpatient care (at pharmacy prices with VAT) 2,284 4.4 OTC medicines in outpatient care (at pharmacy prices with VAT) 357 0.8 sales to hospitals (at wholesale prices) 818 9.9 Reimbursement of medicine costs 1,551 6.2 Basic Refunds 316 3.0 Special Refunds 1,029 5.2 Additional Refunds 205 17.7 Lähde: Fimean lääkemyyntirekisteri, Kelan sairausvakuutuskorvausten tilastointitiedosto. Source: Finnish Medicines Agency, Drug Sales Register; Register of Statistical Information on National Health Insurance General Benefit Payments. SUOMEN LÄÄKETILASTO FINNISH STATISTICS ON MEDICINES 2019 Lääkealan turvallisuus- ja kehittämiskeskus Fimea ja Kansaneläkelaitos Finnish Medicines Agency Fimea and Social Insurance Institution Helsinki 2020 LÄÄKEALAN TURVALLISUUS- KANSANELÄKELAITOS JA KEHITTÄMISKESKUS FIMEA FINNISH MEDICINES AGENCY FIMEA SOCIAL INSURANCE INSTITUTION Lääketurvallisuus Analytiikka- ja tilastoryhmä Pharmacovigilance Section for Analytics and Statistics Mannerheimintie 166 Nordenskiöldinkatu 12 P.O. Box 55 P.O. Box 450 FI-00034 Fimea FI-00056 Kela Finland Finland [email protected] [email protected] Puh. 029 522 3341 Puh. 020 634 11 Tel. +358 29 522 3341 Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Kongressjournal Wmw Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
    W Band 8 / Heft 10 www.springer.at/wmw-skriptum ISSN Print 1613-3803 P. b. b. Verlagspostamt 1201 Wien Plus.Zeitung 07Z037513P SpringerMedizin.at/schwerpunkt/oegari-2011 10/11 skriptum Kongressjournal wmw Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 15. bis 17. September 2011, Wien Jahrestagung der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie, Reanimation und Intensivmedizin Austrian International Congress 2011 – AIC Wissenschaftliche Leitung: Prim. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Sibylle Kozek-Langenecker inhalt 10/11 Inhalt brief der herausgeberin Jahrestagung der 4 Willkommen in Wien! Österreichischen S. Kozek-Langenecker Gesellschaft für beiträge Anästhesiologie, 6 Sedierung durch Nicht-AnästhesistInnen Reanimation und Robert D. Fitzgerald, Wien Intensivmedizin 7 Gerinnungsmanagement bei traumatisch bedingter (ÖGARI) Massivblutung D. Fries, P. Innerhofer, P. Perger, M. Gütl, S. Heil, N. Hofmann, W. Kneifl, L. 15. bis 17. September Neuner, T. Pernerstorfer, G. Pfanner, H. Schöchl, B. Ziegler, C. Köblinger und 2011, Wien S. Kozek-Langenecker, ARGE für perioperative Gerinnung der ÖGARI 10 Erstversorgung von SHT W. Mauritz und A. Brazinova, Wien 11 Extrakorporaler Gasaustausch W. Oczenski und C. Hörmann, Wien–St. Pölten 16 „Coagulation Day 2010“: Thrombosemanagement beim kritisch Kranken E. Schaden, Wien 19 Koma: Differenzialdiagnose im Notfall Schloss Schönbrunn E. Schmutzhard, Innsbruck 20 Präklinische Intubation A. von Goedecke, Steyr 21 Perioperative Gerinnungsoptimierung P. Innerhofer, D. Fries und M. Mittermayr, Innsbruck 24 Ist Muskelrelaxation noch zeitgemäß? K. Khünl-Brady, Innsbruck 26 Impressum wmw skriptum © Springer-Verlag 10/2011 3 brief der herausgeberin Willkommen in Wien! Sehr geehrte Kolleginnen, sehr geehrte Kollegen! Kurzfristig wurde uns die Möglichkeit eröffnet, Beiträge vom diesjährigen Kongress der Österreichi- schen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie, Reanimation und Intensivmedizin (ÖGARI) mit diesem PRIM.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Consumption in 2017 - 2020
    Page 1 Drug consumption in 2017 - 2020 2020 2019 2018 2017 DDD/ DDD/ DDD/ DDD/ 1000 inhab./ Hospital 1000 inhab./ Hospital 1000 inhab./ Hospital 1000 inhab./ Hospital ATC code Subgroup or chemical substance day % day % day % day % A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 322,79 3 312,53 4 303,08 4 298,95 4 A01 STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 14,28 4 12,82 4 10,77 6 10,46 7 A01A STOMATOLOGICAL PREPARATIONS 14,28 4 12,82 4 10,77 6 10,46 7 A01AA Caries prophylactic agents 11,90 3 10,48 4 8,42 5 8,45 7 A01AA01 sodium fluoride 11,90 3 10,48 4 8,42 5 8,45 7 A01AA03 olaflur 0,00 - 0,00 - 0,00 - 0,00 - A01AB Antiinfectives for local oral treatment 2,36 8 2,31 7 2,31 7 2,02 7 A01AB03 chlorhexidine 2,02 6 2,10 7 2,09 7 1,78 7 A01AB11 various 0,33 21 0,21 0 0,22 0 0,24 0 A01AD Other agents for local oral treatment 0,02 0 0,03 0 0,04 0 - - A01AD02 benzydamine 0,02 0 0,03 0 0,04 0 - - A02 DRUGS FOR ACID RELATED DISORDERS 73,05 3 71,13 3 69,32 3 68,35 3 A02A ANTACIDS 2,23 1 2,22 1 2,20 1 2,30 1 A02AA Magnesium compounds 0,07 22 0,07 22 0,08 22 0,10 19 A02AA04 magnesium hydroxide 0,07 22 0,07 22 0,08 22 0,10 19 A02AD Combinations and complexes of aluminium, 2,17 0 2,15 0 2,12 0 2,20 0 calcium and magnesium compounds A02AD01 ordinary salt combinations 2,17 0 2,15 0 2,12 0 2,20 0 A02B DRUGS FOR PEPTIC ULCER AND 70,82 3 68,91 3 67,12 3 66,05 4 GASTRO-OESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (GORD) A02BA H2-receptor antagonists 0,17 7 0,74 4 1,10 4 1,11 5 A02BA02 ranitidine 0,00 1 0,63 3 0,99 3 0,99 4 A02BA03 famotidine 0,16 7 0,11 8 0,11 10 0,12 9 A02BB Prostaglandins 0,04 62
    [Show full text]
  • FDA Approves ZONTIVITY™ (Vorapaxar), First-In-Class PAR-1
    NEWS RELEASE FDA Approves ZONTIVITY™ (vorapaxar), First-in-Class PAR-1 Antagonist, for the Reduction of Thrombotic Cardiovascular Events in Patients with a History of Heart Attack or with Peripheral Arterial Disease 5/12/2014 ZONTIVITY Added to Standard of Care Demonstrated Long-Term Benet Through Three Years Merck (NYSE:MRK), known as MSD outside the United States and Canada, today announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved ZONTIVITY™ (vorapaxar) for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in patients with a history of heart attack (myocardial infarction) or in patients with narrowing of leg arteries, called peripheral arterial disease (PAD). For patients with a history of heart attack or with PAD who had no history of stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), ZONTIVITY added to standard of care produced a signicant 17 percent relative risk reduction over the three years of the study for the combined events of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and urgent coronary revascularization (UCR) [event rate 10.1 percent vs. 11.8 percent for placebo]. For the key secondary composite ecacy endpoint of CV death, MI and stroke alone, ZONTIVITY produced a signicant 20 percent relative risk reduction in these patients [7.9 percent vs. 9.5 percent for placebo]. These results were driven by an 18 percent relative risk reduction in MI [5.4 percent vs. 6.4 percent for placebo] and a 33 percent relative risk reduction in rst stroke [1.2 percent vs. 1.6 percent for placebo]. The prescribing information for ZONTIVITY includes a boxed warning regarding bleeding risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory News
    WHO Drug Information Vol. 28, No. 4, 2014 Regulatory news Ebola curative – transfusions of whole blood or blood plasma from recovered patients Update on treatments and vaccines have been scheduled to be conducted in Liberia, in line with WHO technical The Ebola crisis has prompted an guidelines (4). unprecedented cooperation between regulators In September the European Medicines to support WHO and to advise on possible Agency (EMA) established an expert pathways for the development, evaluation and group to review available information approval of medicines to fight Ebola. Progress on Ebola experimental treatments – towards provision of treatments and vaccines is excluding convalescent therapies – and summarized below. invited developers to submit their data (5). In August 2014, a WHO-convened panel Vaccines had agreed unanimously that is ethically On 29–30 September, 70 experts acceptable to use of experimental attended a WHO-convened consultation medicines and vaccines under the on Ebola vaccines. They took stock of the exceptional circumstances of the Ebola many ongoing efforts to rapidly evaluate epidemic (1). In early September, WHO the safety and efficacy of Ebola vaccines convened a consultation on potential for deployment as soon as possible to Ebola therapies and vaccines (2). The critical frontline workers and ultimately to importance of supportive care and populations at risk in mass vaccination community response was stressed in this campaigns. Two candidate vaccines have and subsequent discussions. clinical-grade vials available for safety trials. (6) Treatments In October, WHO convened industry In September, more than 200 experts leaders and key partners to discuss trials from around the world met at WHO and production of Ebola vaccine (7).
    [Show full text]