DOCSLIB.ORG

Deep South Expansion Project Final Supplemental Environmental

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deep South Expansion Project Final Supplemental Environmental BLM MOUNTLEWIS FIELD OFFICE Final Deep South Expansion Project Supplemental Environmental Report – Water Resources and Geochemistry Prepared in Support of: File Number: NVN-067575 (16-1A) DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2016-0052 EIS Bureau of Land Management Battle Mountain District Office Mount Lewis Field Office 50 Bastian Road Battle Mountain, NV 89820 2019 COOPERATING AGENCIES: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife Lander County and Eureka County BLM Mission Statement The Bureau of Land Management’s mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Prepared in Support of: DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2016-0052 EIS Deep South Expansion Project Supplemental Environmental Report Water Resources and Geochemistry i Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Alternatives Including the Proposed Action .............................................................. 2-1 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Existing Facilities .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Proposed Action ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3.1 Project Overview ..................................................................................... 2-1 2.3.2 Dewatering, Water Management, and Hydrologic Monitoring............... 2-15 2.3.3 Applicant-committed Environmental Protection Measures .................... 2-16 2.3.4 Reclamation .......................................................................................... 2-18 2.4 Alternatives to the Proposed Action ................................................................... 2-20 2.4.1 Gold Acres Pit Partial Backfill Alternative .............................................. 2-20 2.4.2 No Action Alternative ............................................................................. 2-20 2.5 Past, Present, and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions ............................. 2-25 3.0 Water Resources and Geochemistry .......................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Affected Environment ........................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1 Hydrologic Setting ................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 Surface Water Resources ....................................................................... 3-5 3.1.3 Groundwater Resources ....................................................................... 3-23 3.1.4 Waste Rock Characterization ................................................................ 3-41 3.1.5 Water Rights ......................................................................................... 3-44 3.2 Environmental Consequences ........................................................................... 3-48 3.2.1 Evaluation Methodology ........................................................................ 3-49 3.2.2 Proposed Action .................................................................................... 3-59 3.2.3 Gold Acres Pit Partial Backfill Alternative .............................................. 3-87 3.2.4 No Action Alternative ............................................................................. 3-87 3.3 Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................................ 3-93 3.3.1 Proposed Action .................................................................................... 3-93 3.3.2 Gold Acres Pit Partial Backfill Alternative ............................................ 3-101 3.4 Monitoring and Mitigation Measures................................................................. 3-101 3.5 Residual Adverse Effects ................................................................................. 3-103 4.0 References .................................................................................................................... 4-1 2019 Deep South Expansion Project Supplemental Environmental Report Water Resources and Geochemistry ii List of Tables Table 2-1 Currently Authorized Disturbance and Proposed New Disturbance under the Proposed Action .......................................................................................... 2-15 Table 2-2 Dewatering and Disposal Rates for the Proposed Action ................................. 2-16 Table 2-3 Currently Authorized Disturbance and Proposed New Disturbance under the Gold Acres Pit Partial Backfill Alternative .................................................... 2-23 Table 2-4 Surface Disturbance Associated with Past and Present Actions and RFFAs ............................................................................................................... 2-25 Table 3-1 Hydrographic Areas ............................................................................................ 3-1 Table 3-2 Mean Annual Precipitation at Selected Regional Sites ....................................... 3-2 Table 3-3 Named Streams within the Hydrologic Study Area ............................................. 3-6 Table 3-4 Summary of Springs and Seeps Identified within the Project Region ............... 3-12 Table 3-5 General Nevada Water Quality Standards ........................................................ 3-19 Table 3-6 Summary of Hydrogeologic Units in the Study Area ......................................... 3-23 Table 3-7 Estimated Annual Groundwater Budget for the HSA (2015) ............................. 3-35 Table 3-8 Summary of Background Groundwater Quality in the Vicinity of the Pipeline Pit Complex, Cortez Pit, Cortez Hills Pit, and Cortez Hills Underground Mine Operations .......................................................................... 3-40 Table 3-9 Summary of Acid-base Accounting Results ...................................................... 3-43 Table 3-10 Summary of Humidity Cell Tests ....................................................................... 3-43 Table 3-11 Private Active Water Rights .............................................................................. 3-45 Table 3-12 Summary of Historic and Model Simulated Future Dewatering Requirements .................................................................................................... 3-51 Table 3-13 Summary of Historic and Estimated Future infiltration Requirements ............... 3-53 Table 3-14 Potential Impacts to Perennial Water Resources Located Within the Projected Groundwater Drawdown Area .......................................................... 3-58 Table 3-15 Summary of Predicted Pit Lakes at 500 Years Post-mining under the Proposed Action ................................................................................................ 3-67 Table 3-16 Perennial Stream Miles Located within the Projected Drawdown Areas .......... 3-69 Table 3-17 Springs Located within the Projected Drawdown Areas ................................... 3-70 Table 3-18 Private Water Rights Located Within the Predicted Drawdown Area ............... 3-75 Table 3-19 Simulated Groundwater Budget Summary for the HSA Under the Proposed Action ................................................................................................ 3-76 Table 3-20 Model-predicted Pit Backfill Pore Water Chemistry at Approximately 100 Years ................................................................................................................. 3-80 Table 3-21 Summary of Predicted Pit Lakes at 200 Years Post-mining Under the No Action Alternative .............................................................................................. 3-90 Table 3-22 Simulated Groundwater Budget Summary for the HSA Under the No Action Alternative .............................................................................................. 3-92 Table 3-23 Simulated Groundwater Budget Summary for the HSA Under Cumulative .... 3-100 2019 Deep South Expansion Project Supplemental Environmental Report Water Resources and Geochemistry iii List of Figures Figure 1-1 Project Vicinity .................................................................................................... 1-2 Figure 2-1 Existing Mine Facilities ........................................................................................ 2-3 Figure 2-2 Proposed Action .................................................................................................. 2-4 Figure 2-3 Proposed Action Mine Complexes ...................................................................... 2-5 Figure 2-4 Pipeline Pit Complex Backfill Scenario 1 ............................................................ 2-6 Figure 2-5 Pipeline Pit Complex Backfill Scenario 2 ............................................................ 2-7 Figure 2-6 Pipeline Pit Complex Backfill Scenario 3 ............................................................ 2-8 Figure 2-7 Gold Acres Pit and Satellite Pits ....................................................................... 2-11 Figure 2-8 Cortez Hills Pit Backfill ...................................................................................... 2-12 Figure 2-9 Cortez Pit and Ada 52 Pit Backfill ....................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Northern Paiute and Western Shoshone Land Use in Northern Nevada: a Class I Ethnographic/Ethnohistoric Overview
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management NEVADA NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Ginny Bengston CULTURAL RESOURCE SERIES NO. 12 2003 SWCA ENVIROHMENTAL CON..·S:.. .U LTt;NTS . iitew.a,e.El t:ti.r B'i!lt e.a:b ~f l-amd :Nf'arat:1.iern'.~nt N~:¥G~GI Sl$i~-'®'ffl'c~. P,rceP,GJ r.ei l l§y. SWGA.,,En:v,ir.e.m"me'Y-tfol I €on's.wlf.arats NORTHERN PAIUTE AND WESTERN SHOSHONE LAND USE IN NORTHERN NEVADA: A CLASS I ETHNOGRAPHIC/ETHNOHISTORIC OVERVIEW Submitted to BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Nevada State Office 1340 Financial Boulevard Reno, Nevada 89520-0008 Submitted by SWCA, INC. Environmental Consultants 5370 Kietzke Lane, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89511 (775) 826-1700 Prepared by Ginny Bengston SWCA Cultural Resources Report No. 02-551 December 16, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................v List of Appendixes ............................................................ vi CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................1 CHAPTER 2. ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW .....................................4 Northern Paiute ............................................................4 Habitation Patterns .......................................................8 Subsistence .............................................................9 Burial Practices ........................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrographic Basins Information
    A p p e n d i x A - B a s i n 54 Crescent Valley Page 1 of 6 Basin 54 - Crescent Valley Crescent Valley is a semi-closed basin that is bounded on the west by the Shoshone Range, on the east by the Cortez Mountains, on the south by the Toiyabe Range, and on the north by the Dry Hills. The drainage basin is about 45 miles long, 20 miles wide, and includes an area of approximately 750 square miles. Water enters the basin primarily as precipitation and is discharged primarily through evaporation and transpiration. Relatively small quantities of water enter the basin as surface flow and ground water underflow from the adjacent Carico Lake Valley at Rocky Pass, where Cooks Creek enters the southwestern end of Crescent Valley. Ground water generally flows northeasterly along the axis of the basin. The natural flow of ground water from Crescent Valley discharges into the Humboldt River between Rose Ranch and Beowawe. It is estimated that the average annual net discharge rate is approximately 700 to 750 acre-feet annually. Many of the streams which drain snowmelt of rainfall from the mountains surrounding Crescent Valley do not reach the dry lake beds on the Valley floor: instead, they branch into smaller channels that eventually run dry. Runoff from Crescent Valley does not reach Humboldt River with the exception of Coyote Creek, an intermittent stream that flows north from the Malpais to the Humboldt River and several small ephemeral streams that flow north from the Dry Hills. Surface flow in the Carico Lake Valley coalesces into Cooks Creek, which enters Crescent Valley through Rocky Pass.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemical Reconnaissance of the Cortez-Buckhorn Area, X Southern Cortez Mountains, -V Nevada
    - Geochemical Reconnaissance of the Cortez-Buckhorn Area, x Southern Cortez Mountains, -v Nevada By JOHN D. WELLS and JAMES E. ELLIOTT , CONTRIBUTIONS TO ECONOMIC GEOLOGY \ _____________________________ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1312-P * Geochemical data show the distribution of gold, silver, mercury, arsenic, antimony, copper, zinc, molybdenum, and tellurium in carbonate and siliceous sedimentary rocks - and granitic and basaltic igneous rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1971 -A, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 79-609840 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 2040 CONTENTS Pago Abstract._________-_-_---____-_-_-----__-- PI Introduction. ______._.__.._._._.__-.__-.__- 2 Previous geochemical and geologic work... 2 Acknowledgments. _____.____-___-.___-. 2 General geology.___._._._-..-_-_._.-_.. 4 Ore deposits.________________---_-_-_-_ 5 Current geochemical work.__________________ 6 Geochemical anomalies.______-----_-_-_-_._ 7 Geochemical maps-__--_--_-_---------_-_-- 8 Summary of geochemical anomalies.__-_-__-_- 14 Summary of geologic associations.._.__.-_-_._ 15 Geochemical anomalies and exploration targets. 16 References cited._______--____-____-_-_--_- 17 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates are in pocket] PLATE 1. Generalized geologic map and geochemical map showing dis­ tribution of silver, Cortez-Buckhorn area, Lander and Eure­ ka Counties, Nevada. 2. Geochemical maps showing distribution of gold, mercury, ar­ senic, and antimony, Cortez-Buckhorn area, Lander and Eureka Counties, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of NEVADA Brian Sandoval, Governor
    STATE OF NEVADA Brian Sandoval, Governor DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE Tony Wasley, Director GAME DIVISION Brian F. Wakeling, Chief Mike Cox, Big Game Staff Biologist Pat Jackson, Carnivore Staff Biologist Cody McKee, Elk Staff Biologist Cody Schroeder, Mule Deer Staff Biologist Peregrine Wolff, Wildlife Health Specialist Western Region Southern Region Eastern Region Regional Supervisors Mike Scott Steve Kimble Tom Donham Big Game Biologists Chris Hampson Joe Bennett Travis Allen Carl Lackey Pat Cummings Clint Garrett Kyle Neill Cooper Munson Matt Jeffress Ed Partee Kari Huebner Jason Salisbury Jeremy Lutz Kody Menghini Tyler Nall Scott Roberts Cover photo credit: Mike Cox This publication will be made available in an alternative format upon request. Nevada Department of Wildlife receives funding through the Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration. Federal Laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. If you believe you’ve been discriminated against in any NDOW program, activity, or facility, please write to the following: Diversity Program Manager or Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife 4401 North Fairfax Drive, Mailstop: 7072-43 6980 Sierra Center Parkway, Suite 120 Arlington, VA 22203 Reno, Nevada 8911-2237 Individuals with hearing impairments may contact the Department via telecommunications device at our Headquarters at 775-688-1500 via a text telephone (TTY) telecommunications device by first calling the State of Nevada Relay Operator at 1-800-326-6868. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE 2017-2018 BIG GAME STATUS This program is supported by Federal financial assistance titled “Statewide Game Management” submitted to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Route for the Overland Stage
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All USU Press Publications USU Press 2008 A Route for the Overland Stage Jesse G. Petersen Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/usupress_pubs Part of the Creative Writing Commons, and the Environmental Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Petersen, J. G. (2008). A route for the overland stage: James H. Simpson's 1859 trail across the Great Basin. Logan: Utah State University Press. This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the USU Press at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All USU Press Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 6693-6_OverlandStageCVR.ai93-6_OverlandStageCVR.ai 5/20/085/20/08 10:49:4010:49:40 AMAM C M Y CM MY CY CMY K A Route for the Overland Stage Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division. Colonel James H. Simpson shown during his Civil War service as an offi cer of the Fourth New Jersey infantry. A Route for the Overland Stage James H. Simpson’s 1859 Trail Across the Great Basin Jesse G. Petersen Foreword by David L. Bigler Utah State University Press Logan, Utah Copyright ©2008 Utah State University Press All rights reserved Utah State University Press Logan, Utah 84322-7800 www.usu.edu/usupress Manufactured in the United States of America Printed on recycled, acid-free paper ISBN: 978-0-87421-693-6 (paper) ISBN: 978-0-87421-694-3 (e-book) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Petersen, Jesse G.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Potentialities in the Crescent Valley Eureka and Lander Countief Nevada
    Ground-Water Potentialities in the Crescent Valley Eureka and Lander Countief Nevada By C. P. ZONES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY \VATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1581 Prepared in cooperation with the State of Nevada, Office of the State Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1961 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows: Zones, Christie Paul, 1926- Ground-water potentialities in the Crescent Valley, Eu­ reka and Lander Counties, Nevada. Washington~ U.S. iv, 522 p. maps, diagrs., tables. 25 em. (U.S. Geological Survey. Water-supply paper 1581) Prepared in cooperation with the State of Nevada, Office of the State Engineer. Bibliography : p. 48. 1. Water, Underground-Nevada-Crescent Valley. 2. Water-supply­ Nevada-Crescent Valley. 3. Borings-Nevada-Crescent Valley. 4. Wa­ ter-Analysis. I. Nevada. State Engineer. II. Title: Crescent Valley, Eureka and Lander Counties, Nevada. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printin~ Office WashlnJlton 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Abstract--------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction------------------------------------------------------ 2 Purpose and scope of the investigation___________________________ 2 CleographY--------------------------------------------------- 3 Numbering system for wells and springs__________________________ 5 Climate---------------------------------------------------------- 6 Landforms
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States
    Jump to Navigation Quaternary Fault and Fold Database of the United States As of January 12, 2017, the USGS maintains a limited number of metadata fields that characterize the Quaternary faults and folds of the United States. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the interactive fault map. Simpson Park Mountains fault zone (Class A) No. 1178 Last Review Date: 2011-09-01 citation for this record: Lidke, D.J., Anderson, R.E., and Haller, K.M., compilers, 2011, Fault number 1178, Simpson Park Mountains fault zone, in Quaternary fault and fold database of the United States: U.S. Geological Survey website, https://earthquakes.usgs.gov/hazards/qfaults, accessed 12/14/2020 02:16 PM. Synopsis This northeast-striking fault zone consists mainly of range-front faults that place bedrock against Pleistocene piedmont-slope deposits along the western flank of the Simpson Park Mountains. It continues north to the southwestern end of the Cortez Mountains and may represent a southward continuation of the Cortez Mountains fault zone [1157] to the northeast. Some of the faults form scarps on piedmont-slope deposits that are reportedly as young as Holocene. Although there evidence along the fault zone for at least one faulting event that could be Holocene, estimates of offsets along individual faults, or along the entire fault zone have not been reported. The fault zone has not been studied in great detail and little is actually known with certainty about the nature and character of these faults. Name dePolo (1998 #2845) referred to this fault zone as the Simpson comments Park Mountains fault zone and that name is used herein.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Willow Creek Area, Elko County, Nevada
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF John Henry Whitaker for the degree of Master of Science in Geology presented on May 6, 1985 Title: GEOLOGY OF THE WILLOW CREEK AREA, ELKO COUNTY, NEVADA Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy . G. Joh761 The purpose of this study was to test two hypotheses. The first hypothesis interprets allochthonous rocks in the Willow Creekarea of the Pinyon Range as lying on flat, superficial thrusts that truncate the underlying folded Mississippian rocks of the Antler flyschsequence. The second hypothesis interprets the allochthonous rocksas being folded within the Mississippian sequence as if they had arrivedas part of the Antler allochthon after flysch sedimentation had begun andwere overlapped as sedimentation continued. Evidence presented here supports the second hypothesis. During Early and Middle Devonian time, deposition in the central Pinyon Range occurred in a miogeoclinal shallow-shelf environment characterized by carbonates of the Nevada Group. Onset of the Antler orogeny in Late Devonian time was marked by uplift and erosion or nondeposition in the study area. A west-dipping subduction zone formed to the west in oceanic crust, developing an accretionary wedge which became the Roberts Mountains allochthon. The allochthon was obducted onto the continent as incipient subduction of continental crust occurred. Downbending of the edge of the continent led to the formation of a foreland trough at the leading edge of the allochthon.Telescoping within the allochthon caused it to rise and shed siliciclastic sediments into the trough forming the submarine fan deposits of the Dale Canyon Formation. The allochthon was then emplaced over the Dale Canyon Formation and was subsequently overlapped by deltaic sediments of the Diamond Peak Formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Structure of the Northern Part of the Fish Creek Range, Eureka County, Nevada
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jill M. Bird for the degree ofMaster of Science in Geology presented on February 17. 1989 . Title: Stratigraohy and Structure of the Northern Part of the Fish Creek Range, Eureka County, Nevada. Redacted for Privacy Abstract approved: J.G.\Johnson ) Upper Cambrian through Middle Devonian carbonate and clastic sequences of the northern part of the Fish Creek Range represent shallow-shelf sedimentation in the Cordilleran miogeosyncline. The lower and middle Paleozoic section exposed in the northern Fish Creek Range fits well within regional facies patterns and paleogeographic reconstructions. The Upper Cambrian Dunderberg Shale was deposited in a muddy outer shelf embayment which extended eastward into the Eureka area. The embayment was eliminated as seas regressed in late Dresbachian time and marine carbonate sedimentation (repre- sented by the Catlin Member of the Windfall Formation) was established. The argillaceous Bullwhacker Member of the Windfall was deposited in deeper shelf waters as the sea transgressed briefly during Trempeleauian time. Shallow-shelf carbonates of the Lower Ordovician Goodwin Limestone are succeeded by Ninemile Formation strata represen- ting deposition in a muddy embayment, similar to the Late Cambrian embayment in the Eureka area. Regression followed, and a shallow-water Girvanella-rich carbonate bank prograded westward during Whiterockian (early Middle Ordovician) time, represented by the lower part of the Antelope Valley Limestone. Mudstone and wackestone of the upper part of the Antelope Valley Limestone was deposited in quieter, deeper, or more protected environments shoreward of the bank margin. Basal sands of the Eureka Quartzite prograded westward across the carbonate shelf during the Middle Ordovician.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology and Minerals
    BLM MOUNTLEWIS FIELD OFFICE Final Deep South Expansion Project Supplemental Environmental Report – Geology and Minerals Prepared in Support of: File Number: NVN-067575 (16-1A) DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2016-0052 EIS Bureau of Land Management Battle Mountain District Office Mount Lewis Field Office 50 Bastian Road Battle Mountain, NV 89820 2019 COOPERATING AGENCIES: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Nevada Department of Wildlife Lander County and Eureka County BLM Mission Statement The Bureau of Land Management’s mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. Prepared in Support of: DOI-BLM-NV-B010-2016-0052 EIS Deep South Expansion Project Supplemental Environmental Report Geology and Minerals i Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Alternatives Including the Proposed Action .............................................................. 2-1 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Existing Facilities .................................................................................................. 2-1 2.3 Proposed Action ................................................................................................... 2-1 2.3.1 Project Overview ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Cortez Quadrangle Nevada
    Geology of the Cortez Quadrangle Nevada By JAMES GILLULY and HAROLD MASURSKY With a section on Gravity and Aeromagnetic Surveys By DON R. MABEY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1175 Prepared in cooperation with the Nevada State Bureau of Mines The area includes a thick section of Paleozoic and Tertiary rocks, a window of the Roberts thrust, and a bonanza silver camp UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1965 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract____________________-_---_-__--___-_---_--_-__--------_- 1 Introduction __________________________'__________-_______---_--_-_- 3 Geologic interest of the Cortez quadrangle.____--___-.__--__--__-- 3 Location and accessibility___________.._______--_-_--__-_--_-____ 4 Physical features____-_-__-_________.._-____--_----___--------_- 5 Climate and vegetation__-________--_-____-_------__--------_- 8 Previous work__-__-____---_-__-_--_------_-_----__---_---__- 8 Fieldwork.._.___...___.___----- __.- ...._._.._ 9 Acknowledgments ___-____----------_----__------------------.-- 9 General geology_________-___---___-__..-_--_-__---------_---_-_--_- 10 Principal features__--___---__-_---_-.--_-.-----_--_-----.--_- 10 Stratigraphy of the lower plate of the Roberts thrust (eastern or car­ bonate facies)__-_----__-----__--------_----------------_--_- 13 Cambrian System____»___.__._.___________._______________ 13 Hamburg Dolomite.___________________________________ 13 Cambrian and Ordovician hiatus____________________________ 16 Ordovician System____-_-____--_-_-_-_--_---__-----___-_-.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Nevada, Reno the Historical Archaeology of Ore Milling
    University of Nevada, Reno The Historical Archaeology of Ore Milling: Ideas, Environment, and Technology A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology By Christopher Shaun Richey Dr. Sarah E. Cowie/Thesis Advisor August 2016 THE GRADUATE SCHOOL We recommend that the thesis prepared under our supervision by CHRISTOPHER SHAUN RICHEY Entitled The Historical Archaeology of Ore Milling: Ideas, Environment, and Technology be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Dr. Sarah E. Cowie, Advisor Robert Mcqueen, M.S., Committee Member Dr. William Rowley, Graduate School Representative David W. Zeh, Ph.D., Dean, Graduate School August, 2016 i Abstract Changes in milling technology at the Cortez Mining District, a gold and silver mine located in a remote area of central Nevada, are examined through the study of five mills that were active between 1864 and 1944. Each mill is analyzed through documentary and archaeological sources in order to understand how different forms of technology were implemented and modified to most effectively treat ores over time. Locally, this process of technological adaptation was influenced by changing environmental knowledge. On a larger scale, the milling technology is contrasted against global trends relating to a second wave of industrialization, such as the use of engineering and scientific knowledge in industrial pursuits, and the increasingly systematic deployment of capital. ii Acknowledgements The author would like to express gratitude to Summit Envirosolutions, Inc., Rob McQueen, and Erika Johnson for the opportunity to work in the Cortez Mining District and to develop the questions presented in this thesis.
    [Show full text]