DOCSLIB.ORG

Ospf Routing Protocol Cisco

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ospf Routing Protocol Cisco Ospf Routing Protocol Cisco Caitiff and nonacademic Ron pollinated her crapshooters bewilders while Uriah drove some mortifiers annoyingly. Suffocative and downwind Bailey submit her Trudy agrapha curried and blues mineralogically. Bewildered and revived Brandon never scourged his cavels! OSPF databases with LSA Updates. If you see DTE here instead of DCE skip these parameters. LSDB from another router. They are originated by cisco routing protocol created as areas? All logos, trademarks and registered trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Displays the number of times SPF have run and which areas the router is configured for. OSPF allows for better load balancing. In this configuration, if there was a problem with either routing domain then it would not affect the other IP version. With OSPF being an IGP and BGP being an EGP suggests an obvious division of labor: OSPF handles the internal routing, BGP the routing towards external destinations. OSPF allows for better load balancing based on the actual cost of the link. This reduces LSDB and routing table size for internal routers. As a result, you will not be able to reach the transit link subnet address but still have perfect connectivity within the topology. In this post we tried to provide a practical approach to calculating the optimum throttling timer values based on your recorded network performance. No unused bandwidth between links. Interface mode can be accessed from global configuration mode. Some sources state that internal routers may contain the routers within area zero. Very Simply and Professional! As a result, OSPF has no hop count limit, and can handle much larger networks than RIP. How to setup dynamic routing. We noticed you are not a member yet! DR and BDR election will still be performed so special care should be taken to assure either a full mesh topology or a static selection of the DR based on the interface priority. The analysis of OSPF remains unchanged. Occasionally, it is said that a TSA can have only one ABR. Loopback interfaces as shown in the figure. How can I help you? Please enter your email address. Create a free account today to participate in forum conversations, comment on posts and more. Generated for ospf routing protocol is connected to identify a wireless links. Based on this information, all routers with OSPF implementation continuously update their link state databases with information about the network topology and adjust their routing tables. Bandwidth of cisco router calculates the cost required every ospf are explained in multiple asbrs within the asbr with what are several professional level of cisco routing? OSPF adjacency, which outlines how OSPF functions in practice. With IGRP and EIGRP it is used to change route redistribution, filtering and summarization points. Click here to download your free Cisco CCNA Lab Guide. The router uses the information from the topology database as input into the Dijkstra algorithm that computes the shortest path to every network. Obviously, this requires a hierarchical address plan, which is not always readily available. Routers will not exchange this information between them on their own. Unicode support is up to date. The difference is that, with distance vector routing protocols, the updates come from the point of view of the neighbour. Subnetting: What is Subnet Mask? Also, this introduces more overhead in memory allocation and CPU utilization. OSPF uses the Dijkstra algorithm to calculate the shortest path for the network. OSPF neighborship is built between two routers only if configuration value of Area ID, Authentication, Hello and Dead interval, Stub Area and MTU are matched. UPSes can provide backup power scalability and efficiency. Stay connected with the latest news, product releases and promotions from INE by subscribing to our Newsletter. The remainder of this section is intended only to serve as a reminder to readers who are already familiar with OSPF. If the DR fails, the BDR takes over for the DR. In OSPF, all areas must be connected to a backbone area. Instead of each router exchanging updates with every other router on the segment, every router exchanges information with the DR and BDR. OSPF is extensively used in Cisco networks and is fully supported by the Cisco IOS operating system as we have seen above. It allows the network to select routes between any two nodes on a computer network. Internal routers are specific to one area. Clear all routes from routing table. Definition: OSPF is a routing protocol used to determine the best route for delivering the packets within an IP networks. These differences are listed briefly below. Routing information distribution becomes more structured and also simpler to troubleshoot. Routers that are classified as internal are those that are connected inside an OSPF area. LSA originated by a peer. The resulting configuration model invocation. Underscore may be freely distributed under the MIT license. Routing between two routers that are not directly connected will go through the router that has VCs to both routers. You can use real Cisco devices or any other network simulator software for following this guide. IS utilizes a link state database and runs the SPF Dijkstra algorithm to select shortest paths routes. The full form of BGP is the Border Gateway Protocol. Example JS API: Enable sounds for Visitors. Ever since I discovered your material, whenever someone tweets me asking what study sources I use, I always make sure to mention your videos and lab guide. In particular, multicast hello messages discovered all neighbors dynamically. Upon joining the AS, arouter uses the Hello protocol to discover neighboring routers. EIGRP allows the use of classless network addressing and use enhanced metric calculations, which include considering the bandwidth of the link. Thanks to this each router in ospf domain builds its own link state database. Also, physical interfaces can come up slow or not at all on reboots, which creates the potential for an OSPF router to reboot with a different router ID than the one that it was configured with when it went down. Therefore, just like with the arrival timer tuning, we can mainly ignore the impact of this delay on the fast convergence process. Information on attached interfaces, metrics used, and other variables is included in OSPF LSAs. EIGRP has an instantaneous convergance. The IGPs all do the same job which is to advertise routes within an organization and determine the best path or paths to the different networks. IPCisco is the First Site On My List! Cisco calls it advanced because it has more advanced metrics than RIP, thus, it is a better routing protocol than RIP. IS and OSPF has a special protocol capability to implement suppression automatically. What is Routing Protocols? The host ranges are subnetted to provide all the hosts on the network. Such a router is called ASBR. LSAs with different ages. If that admin similarly configures the other routers, it could additionally influence the election of the DR and the BDR. For maximum speed, relying on IGP keepalive times should be avoided whether possible and physical failure detection mechanisms should be used. Depending on your network configuration the amount of summary addresses could be significant. Command brings interface up. IS assigns the routing process to an interface instead of a network. Support for CIDR addressing. The loopback interface is useful because it is an interface with an IP address which never goes down. SPF algorithm is also known as Dijkstra algorithm. OSPF can scale to the largest LANs but can also start out small. Cisco is an active member of the OSPF working group at the IETF, and is responsible for many of the ongoing enhancements to the protocol. Cisco IOS How to Configure OSPF Fir3net. Systems or any other company. At this state, the adjacency is complete. You are not logged in. Are other areas well summarized? Contrast that with EIGRP, which uses autonomous systems as well. OSPF convergence is fast, in part because OSPF sends only small updates, instead of the entire routing table. In lab environment we need not to worry about this value. Designated routers establish adjacencies with all routers on that network segment. Popular Network Blog on USA! The path with the lowest hop count to the destination is always preferred even if the longer path has a better aggregate link bandwidth and less delays. Interior Gateway Routing Protocol is a distance vector routing protocol developed by Cisco systems for routing multiple protocols across small and medium sized Cisco networks. So in other words, the routers in this area will only accept information from other routers in the same area, no new routing information from other routers. Jesus or the Father? Repeat this step for each neighbor if you want to specify a cost. The problem is with each router having to advertise that new information to its neighbors, it takes a long time for all routers to have a current accurate view of the network. This course has not yet been approved by the New Hampshire Department of Education. Link state and distance vector protocols comprise the primary types. RIP was usually run and handled the redistribution. This term has nothing to do with stub areas. The RIP routing protocol uses the distance vector algorithm whereas the OSPF uses the shortest path algorithm Dijkstra to determine the transmission routes. As indicated above, the router links are an indication of the state of the interfaces on a router belonging to a certain area. RIP, IGRP and EIGRP are often considered to be part of the same family of routing protocol. Also if possible, try to avoid having the same router be the DR on more than one segment.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Safe Routing Reconfigurations with Route Redistribution
    Safe Routing Reconfigurations with Route Redistribution Stefano Vissicchio∗, Laurent Vanbevery, Luca Cittadiniz, Geoffrey G. Xiex, Olivier Bonaventure∗ ∗Universite´ catholique de Louvain, yPrinceton University, zRomaTre University, xNaval Postgraduate School Abstract—Simultaneously providing flexibility, evolvability operators can combine the advantages of different routing and correctness of routing is one of the basic and still unsolved protocols (or different configuration modes), e.g., optimizing problems in networking. Route redistribution provides a tool, one RD for scalability and another for fine-grained traffic used in many enterprise networks, to either partition a network engineering. into multiple routing domains or merge previously independent networks. However, no general technique exists for changing a live The division of an enterprise network in routing domains network’s route redistribution configuration without incurring is not static. Various events can force an enterprise network packet losses and service disruptions. operator to change the boundaries of its routing domains. In this paper, we study the problem of how to safely transition Splitting and merging networks, e.g., to accommodate mergers between route redistribution configurations. We investigate what and acquisitions, are two radical examples. Simply replacing anomalies may occur in the reconfiguration process, showing a router by another router from a different brand may also that many long-lasting forwarding loops can and do occur if force a boundary modification. Finally, the events can be naive techniques are applied. We devise new sufficient conditions driven by short-term objectives such as a change to the traffic for anomaly-free reconfigurations, and we leverage them to engineering requirements or router maintenance, as well as build provably safe and practical reconfiguration procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Complexity of Enterprise Routing Design
    Modeling Complexity of Enterprise Routing Design Xin Sun Sanjay G. Rao Geoffrey G. Xie School of Computing and School of Electrical and Department of Computer Information Sciences Computer Engineering Science Florida International University Purdue University Naval Postgraduate School xinsun@cs.fiu.edu [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT to choose from [23]. Often, multiple designs exist to meet the same operational objectives, and some are significantly Enterprise networks often have complex routing designs given easier to implement and manage than others for a target net- the need to meet a wide set of resiliency, security and rout- work. For example in some cases, route redistribution may ing policies. In this paper, we take the position that minimiz- be a simpler alternative to BGP for connecting multiple rout- ing design complexity must be an explicit objective of rout- ing domains [16]. Lacking an analytical model to guide the ing design. We take a first step to this end by presenting a operators, the current routing design process is mostly ad systematic approach for modeling and reasoning about com- hoc, prone to creating designs more complex than necessary. plexity in enterprise routing design. We make three contri- butions. First, we present a framework for precisely defining In this paper, we seek to quantitatively model the com- objectives of routing design, and for reasoning about how a plexity associated with a routing design, with a view to de- combination of routing design primitives (e.g. routing in- veloping alternate routing designs that are less complex but stances, static routes, and route filters etc.) will meet the ob- meet the same set of operational objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • Shedding Light on the Glue Logic of the Internet Routing Architecture
    Shedding Light on the Glue Logic of the Internet Routing Architecture Franck Le†, Geoffrey G. Xie‡,DanPei∗,JiaWang∗ and Hui Zhang† †Carnegie Mellon University, ‡Naval Postgraduate School, ∗AT&T Labs - Research ABSTRACT A BD Recent studies reveal that the routing structures of operational net- works are much more complex than a simple BGP/IGP hierarchy, Routing domain 1 (OSPF) Routing domain 2 highlighted by the presence of many distinct instances of routing CE(EIGRP 20) protocols. However, the glue (how routing protocol instances inter- act and exchange routes among themselves) is still little understood Routing domain 3 F or studied. For example, although Route Redistribution (RR), the (RIP) implementation of the glue in router software, has been used in the Internet for more than a decade, it was only recently shown G H that RR is extremely vulnerable to anomalies similar to the perma- nent route oscillations in BGP. This paper takes an important step toward understanding how RR is used and how fundamental the Figure 1: An example enterprise network. role RR plays in practice. We developed a complete model and associated tools for characterizing interconnections between rout- ing instances based on analysis of router configuration data. We are often linked together not by BGP. Instead, routes are exchanged analyzed and characterized the RR usage in more than 1600 opera- between different routing domains via route redistribution options tional networks. The findings are: (i) RR is indeed widely used; (ii) configured on individual border routers connecting these domains. operators use RR to achieve important design objectives not realiz- Figure 1 illustrates such a design.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Route Redistribution
    Understanding Route Redistribution Franck Le Geoffrey G. Xie Hui Zhang Carnegie Mellon University Naval Postgraduate School Carnegie Mellon University [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Route redistribution (RR) has become an integral option local to a router. It designates the dissemination of part of IP network design as the result of a growing need routing information from one protocol process to another for disseminating certain routes across routing protocol bound- within the same router. For routers in the RIP instance to learn aries. While RR is widely used and resembles BGP in several nontrivial aspects, surprisingly, the safety of RR has not been the prefixes in the OSPF instance, a router (e.g., D or E) needs systematically studied by the networking community. This paper to run both a process of RIP and a process of OSPF and inject presents the first analytical model for understanding the effect the OSPF routes into the RIP instance. of RR on network wide routing dynamics and evaluating the As such, router vendors introduced RR to address a need safety of a specific RR configuration. We first illustrate how from network operations. We recently looked at the configura- easily inaccurate configurations of RR may cause severe routing instabilities, including route oscillations and persistent routing tions of some large university campus networks and found that loops. At the same time, general observations regarding the root RR is indeed widely used. However, contrary to traditional causes of these instabilities are provided. We then introduce a routing protocols, there is no standard or RFC formally formal model based on the general observations to represent defining the functionality of RR.
    [Show full text]
  • IWAN) Direct Internet Access (DIA
    CISCO VALIDATED DESIGN IWAN Direct Internet Access Design Guide December 2016 REFERENCE NETWORK ARCHITECTURE Table of Contents Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Related Reading ...............................................................................................................................................................1 Technology Use Cases .....................................................................................................................................................1 Overview of Cisco IWAN and Secure DIA .......................................................................................................................4 Direct Internet Access Design ........................................................................................................ 10 Design Detail ................................................................................................................................................................. 10 Deploying Direct Internet Access ................................................................................................... 28 Using This Section ........................................................................................................................................................ 28 IWAN Single-Router Hybrid Remote Site with DIA .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Border Gateway Protocol, Route Manipulation, and IP Multicast
    C H A P T E R12 Border Gateway Protocol, Route Manipulation, and IP Multicast This chapter covers the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP), which is used to exchange routes between autonomous systems. It is most frequently used between enterprises and service providers. The “Route Manipulation” section covers route summarization and redistribution of route information between routing protocols. The CCDA should know where redistribution occurs when required by the network design. This chapter also reviews policy-based routing (PBR) as a method to change the destination IP address based on policies. Finally, this chapter covers IP multicast protocols. “Do I Know This Already?” Quiz The purpose of the “Do I Know This Already?” quiz is to help you decide whether you need to read the entire chapter. If you intend to read the entire chapter, you do not necessarily need to answer these questions now. The eight-question quiz, derived from the major sections in the “Foundation Topics” portion of the chapter, helps you determine how to spend your limited study time. Table 12-1 outlines the major topics discussed in this chapter and the “Do I Know This Already?” quiz questions that correspond to those topics. Table 12-1 “Do I Know This Already?” Foundation Topics Section-to-Question Mapping Foundation Topics Section Questions Covered in This Section BGP 1, 2, 7, 8 Route Manipulation 3, 4 IP Multicast Review 5, 6 CAUTION The goal of self-assessment is to gauge your mastery of the topics in this chapter. If you do not know the answer to a question or you are only partially sure, you should mark this question wrong for the purposes of the self-assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • IP Routing: Protocol-Independent Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS XE Release 3E
    IP Routing: Protocol-Independent Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS XE Release 3E Americas Headquarters Cisco Systems, Inc. 170 West Tasman Drive San Jose, CA 95134-1706 USA http://www.cisco.com Tel: 408 526-4000 800 553-NETS (6387) Fax: 408 527-0883 THE SPECIFICATIONS AND INFORMATION REGARDING THE PRODUCTS IN THIS MANUAL ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE. ALL STATEMENTS, INFORMATION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THIS MANUAL ARE BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE BUT ARE PRESENTED WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. USERS MUST TAKE FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR APPLICATION OF ANY PRODUCTS. THE SOFTWARE LICENSE AND LIMITED WARRANTY FOR THE ACCOMPANYING PRODUCT ARE SET FORTH IN THE INFORMATION PACKET THAT SHIPPED WITH THE PRODUCT AND ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY THIS REFERENCE. IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SOFTWARE LICENSE OR LIMITED WARRANTY, CONTACT YOUR CISCO REPRESENTATIVE FOR A COPY. The Cisco implementation of TCP header compression is an adaptation of a program developed by the University of California, Berkeley (UCB) as part of UCB's public domain version of the UNIX operating system. All rights reserved. Copyright © 1981, Regents of the University of California. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER WARRANTY HEREIN, ALL DOCUMENT FILES AND SOFTWARE OF THESE SUPPLIERS ARE PROVIDED “AS IS" WITH ALL FAULTS. CISCO AND THE ABOVE-NAMED SUPPLIERS DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THOSE OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT OR ARISING FROM A COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE, OR TRADE PRACTICE. IN NO EVENT SHALL CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY INDIRECT, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS OR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO DATA ARISING OUT OF THE USE OR INABILITY TO USE THIS MANUAL, EVEN IF CISCO OR ITS SUPPLIERS HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 11: IGP Route Redistribution, Route Summarization, and Default Routing
    Blueprint topics covered in this chapter: This chapter covers the following topics from the Cisco CCIE Routing and Switching written exam blueprint: ■ IP Routing — OSPF — EIGRP — Route Filtering — RIPv2 — The use of show and debug commands C H A P T E R 11 IGP Route Redistribution, Route Summarization, and Default Routing This chapter covers several topics related to the use of multiple IGP routing protocols. IGPs can use default routes to pull packets toward a small set of routers, with those routers having learned routes from some external source. IGPs can use route summarization with a single routing protocol, but it is often used at redistribution points between IGPs as well. Finally, route redistribution by definition involves moving routes from one routing source to another. This chapter takes a look at each topic. “Do I Know This Already?” Quiz Table 11-1 outlines the major headings in this chapter and the corresponding “Do I Know This Already?” quiz questions. Table 11-1 “Do I Know This Already?” Foundation Topics Section-to-Question Mapping Foundation Topics Section Questions Covered in This Section Score Route Maps, Prefix Lists, and Administrative 1–2 Distance Route Redistribution 3–6 Route Summarization 7–8 Default Routes 9 Total Score In order to best use this pre-chapter assessment, remember to score yourself strictly. You can find the answers in Appendix A, “Answers to the ‘Do I Know This Already?’ Quizzes.” 314 Chapter 11: IGP Route Redistribution, Route Summarization, and Default Routing 1. A route map has several clauses. A route map’s first clause has a permit action configured.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Redistribution V1.14 – Aaron Balchunas 1
    Route Redistribution v1.14 – Aaron Balchunas 1 - Route Redistribution - Route Redistribution Basics It is preferable to employ a single routing protocol in an internetwork environment, for simplicity and ease of management. Unfortunately, this is not always possible, making multi-protocol environments common. Route Redistribution allows routes from one routing protocol to be advertised into another routing protocol. The routing protocol receiving these redistributed routes usually marks the routes as external. External routes are usually less preferred than locally-originated routes. At least one redistribution point needs to exist between the two routing domains. This device will actually run both routing protocols. Thus, to perform redistribution in the following example, RouterB would require at least one interface in both the EIGRP and the OSPF routing domains: It is possible to redistribute from one routing protocol to the same routing protocol, such as between two separate OSPF domains (distinguished by unique process ID’s ). Static routes and connected interfaces can be redistributed into a routing protocol as well. Routes will only be redistributed if they exist in the routing table. Routes that are simply in a topology database (for example, an EIGRP Feasible Successor), will never be redistributed. Routing metrics are a key consideration when performing route redistribution. With the exception of IGRP and EIGRP, each routing protocol utilizes a unique (and thus incompatible) metric. Routes redistributed from the injecting protocol must be manually (or globally) stamped with a metric that is understood by the receiving protocol. (Reference: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/redist.html ) * * * All original material copyright © 2007 by Aaron Balchunas ( [email protected] ), unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Analysis of Route Redistribution Among Diverse Dynamic Routing Protocols Based on OPNET Simulation
    (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2017 Performance Analysis of Route Redistribution among Diverse Dynamic Routing Protocols based on OPNET Simulation Zeyad Mohammad1 Adnan A. Hnaif3 Faculty of Science and Information Technology Faculty of Science and Information Technology Al Zaytoonah University of Jordan Al Zaytoonah University of Jordan Amman, 11733 Jordan Amman, 11733 Jordan Ahmad Abusukhon2 Issa S. Al-Otoum4 Faculty of Science and Information Technology Faculty of Science and Information Technology Al Zaytoonah University of Jordan Al Zaytoonah University of Jordan Amman, 11733 Jordan Amman, 11733 Jordan Abstract—Routing protocols are the fundamental block of information among autonomous system (AS) on the Internet. It selecting the optimal path from a source node to a destination is considered a distance vector routing protocol. An Interior node in internetwork. Due to emerge the large networks in Gateway Protocol is used to exchange routing information business aspect thus; they operate diverse routing protocols in between gateways within an AS. It consists of distance vector their infrastructure. In order to keep a large network connected; and link state routing protocols. A distance vector algorithm the implementation of the route redistribution is needed in builds a vector that contains costs to all other nodes and network routers. This paper creates the four scenarios on the distributes a vector to its neighbors. A link state algorithm in same network topology by using Optimized Network Engineering which each node finds out the state of the link to its neighbors Tools Modeler (OPNET 14.5) simulator in order to analyze the and the cost of each link.
    [Show full text]
  • WAN Architectures and Design Principles Adam Groudan – Technical Solutions Architect Agenda
    WAN Architectures and Design Principles Adam Groudan – Technical Solutions Architect Agenda . WAN Technologies & Solutions • WAN Transport Technologies • WAN Overlay Technologies • WAN Optimisation • Wide Area Network Quality of Service . WAN Architecture Design Considerations • WAN Design and Best Practices • Secure WAN Communication with GETVPN • Intelligent WAN Deployment . Summary The Challenge . Build a network that can adapt to a quickly changing business and technical environment . Realise rapid strategic advantage from new technologies • IPv6: global reachability • Cloud: flexible diversified resources • Internet of Things • Fast-IT • What’s next? . Adapt to business changes rapidly and smoothly • Mergers & divestures • Changes in the regulatory & security requirements • Changes in public perception of services Network Design Modularity East Theater West Theater Global IP/MPLS Core Tier 1 Tier In-Theater IP/MPLS Core Tier 2 Tier West Region East Region Internet Cloud Public Voice/Video Mobility Tier 3 Tier Metro Metro Service Private Service Public IP IP Service Service Hierarchical Network Principle . Use hierarchy to manage network scalability and complexity while reducing routing algorithm overhead . Hierarchical design used to be… • Three routed layers • Core, distribution, access • Only one hierarchical structure end-to-end . Hierarchical design has become any design that… • Splits the network up into “places,” or “regions” • Separates these “regions” by hiding information • Organises these “regions” around a network core • “hub and spoke” at a macro level MPLS L3VPN Topology Definition Spoke Site 1 Spoke Spoke Site 2 Site Y Hub Site (The Network) SP-Managed Equivalent to MPLS IP WAN Spoke Spoke Spoke Spoke Spoke Spoke Spoke Site 1 Site 2 Site X Site Y Site N Site X Site N .
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Performance Analysis of Route Redistribution Among Three Different Routing Protocols Based on Opnet Simulation
    International Journal of Computer Networks & Communications (IJCNC) Vol.9, No.2, March 2017 A COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF ROUTE REDISTRIBUTION AMONG THREE DIFFERENT ROUTING PROTOCOLS BASED ON OPNET SIMULATION Zeyad Mohammad 1, Ahmad Abusukhon 2 and Marzooq A. Al-Maitah 3 1,3 Department of Computer Network, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan 2Department of Computer Science, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan ABSTRACT In an enterprise network, it is normal to use multiple dynamic routing protocols for forwarding packets. Therefore, the route redistribution is an important issue in an enterprise network that has been configured by multiple different routing protocols in its routers. In this study, we analyse the performance of the combination of three routing protocols in each scenario and make a comparison among our scenarios. We have used the OPNET 17.5 simulator to create the three scenarios in this paper by selecting three different routing protocols from the distance vector and link state routing protocols in each scenario. In the first scenario, the network routers are configured from EIGRP, IGRP, and IS-IS that is named EIGRP_IGRP_ISIS in our simulation. The OSPF_IGRP_ISIS scenario is a mixed from EIGRP, IGRP, and IS-IS protocols that is the second scenario. The third scenario is OSPF_IGRP_EIGRP that is the route redistribution among OSPF, IGRP, and IS-IS protocols. The simulation results showed that the performance of the EIGRP_IGRP_ISIS scenario is better than the other scenarios in terms of network convergence time, throughput, video packet delay variation, and FTP download response time. In contrast, the OSPF_IGRP_ISIS has less voice packet delay variation, video conferencing and voice packet end to end delays, and queuing delay as compared with the two other scenarios.
    [Show full text]