<<

Math 639: Lecture 16 Equidistribution on

Bob Hough

April 6, 2017

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 1 / 58 Quantitative equidistribution on nilmanifolds

This lecture is based on the paper “The quantitative behavior of polynomial orbits on nilmanifolds” by B. Green and T. Tao, Annals of Math 175 (2012), 465–540.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 2 / 58 Filtrations, nilmanifolds

Definition (Filtrations and nilmanifolds) Let G be a connected, simply connected nilpotent Lie with identity 1G .A filtration G˚ on G is a sequence of closed connected

G “ G0 “ G1 Ą G2 Ą ¨ ¨ ¨ Ą Gd Ą Gd`1 “ t1G u

which has the property that rGi , Gj s Ă Gi`j for all integers i, j ě 0. Let Γ Ă G be a uniform (discrete, cocompact) . The quotient G{Γ “ tgΓ: g P Gu is called a .

We write m “ dim G and mi “ dim Gi .

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 3 / 58 Filtrations, nilmanifolds

In a nilpotent , the lower , defined by

G “ G0 “ G1, Gi`1 “ rG, Gi s

and terminating with Gs`1 “ tidG u, is an example of a filtration. The number s is called the step of G. In general, in a filtration with Gd`1 “ t1G u, d is called the degree.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 4 / 58 Examples

Example In the case s “ 1, up to a linear transformation the nilmanifolds are m m given by tori, G “ R ,Γ “ Z . The lcs filtration is G “ G0 “ G1, G2 “ t1G u.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 5 / 58 Examples

Example The Heisenberg nilmanifold has s “ 2,

1 RR 1 ZZ G “ 0 1 R , Γ “ 0 1 Z . ¨ 0 0 1 ˛ ¨ 0 0 1 ˛ ˝ ‚ ˝ ‚ 1 0 R The lcs filtration has G “ G0 “ G1, G2 “ 0 1 0 , G3 “ t1G u. ¨ 0 0 1 ˛ A fundamental domain for G{Γ is ˝ ‚

1 x1 x2 0 1 x3 : 0 ď x1, x2, x3 ă 1 . $¨ ˛ , & 0 0 1 . ˝ ‚ % - Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 6 / 58 Mal’cev bases

Definition (Mal’cev bases)

Let G{Γ be a m-dimensional nilmanifold and let G˚ be a filtration. A basis X “ tX1, ..., Xmu for the g over R is called a Mal’cev basis for G{Γ adapted to G˚ if the following four conditions are satisfied.

1 For each j “ 0, ..., m ´ 1 the subspace hj :“ SpantXj`1, ..., Xmu is a Lie algebra ideal in g, and Hj “ exp hj is a normal Lie subgroup of G.

2 For every 0 ď i ď s, we have Gi “ Hm´mi 3 Each g P G has a unique expression as exppt1X1q ¨ ¨ ¨ expptmXmq for ti P R 4 Γ consists of those points with all ti P Z.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 7 / 58 Mal’cev bases

Mal’cev proved that any nilmanifold G{Γ can be equipped with a Mal’cev basis adapted to the lower central series filtration.

Given a Mal’cev basis, the coordinates ti are referred to as Mal’cev m coordinates and the Mal’cev coordinate map ψX : G Ñ R is the map ψX pgq :“ pt1, ..., tmq.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 8 / 58 Mal’cev metric

Definition Let G{Γ be a nilmanifold with Mal’cev basis X . We define d “ dX : G ˆ G Ñ Rě0 to be the largest metric such that for all x, y P G,

´1 dpx, yq ď }ψpxy q}8.

Explicitly,

dpx, yq “ n ´1 ´1 inf minp}ψpxi´1xi q}8, }ψpxi xi´1q}8q : x0, ..., xn P G; x0 “ x; xn “ y #i“1 + ÿ and dpxΓ, yΓq “ inf dpx, yγq. γPΓ

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 9 / 58 Rationality of a Mal’cev basis

Definition (Height) The (naive) height of a real number x is defined to be maxp|a|, |b|q if a x “ b is rational in reduced form, and 8 if x is irrational.

Definition (Rationality of a basis) Let G{Γ be a nilmanifold, and let Q ą 0. We say that a Mal’cev basis X for G{Γ is Q-rational if all of the structure constants cijk in the relations

rXi , Xj s “ cijk Xk k ÿ are rational with height at most Q.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 10 / 58 Equidistribution

Definition (Equidistribution) Let G{Γ be a nilmanifold endowed with a unique probability Haar measure dx.

An infinite sequence tgpnqΓunPN is equidistributed if for all continuous functions F : G{Γ Ñ C,

lim EnPrNsrF pgpnqΓqs “ F pxqdx. NÑ8 żG{Γ

An infinite sequence tgpnqΓunPZ in G{Γ is totally equidistributed if the sequences tgpan ` rqΓunPN are equidistributed for all a P Zzt0u and all r P Z.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 11 / 58 Lipschitz functions

Definition (Lipschitz functions) Let pG{Γq be a nilmanifold with Mal’cev basis X . The Lipschitz norm of a function F : G{Γ Ñ C is |F pxq ´ F pyq| }F }Lip :“}F }8 ` sup . x‰yPG{Γ dpx, yq

A function F is said to be Lipschitz if it has finite Lipschitz norm.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 12 / 58 Quantitative equidistribution

Definition (Quantitative equidistribution) Let pG{Γ, dxq as above with a Mal’cev basis X , and let be given an error tolerance δ ą 0 and a length N.

A finite sequence tgpnqΓunPrNs is said to be δ-equidistributed if

EnPrNsrF pgpnqΓqs ´ F pxqdx ď δ}F }Lip ˇ G{Γ ˇ ˇ ż ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ for all Lipschitzˇ functions F : G{Γ Ñ C. ˇ The sequence is totally δ-equidistributed if

EnPP rF pgpnqΓqs ´ F pxqdx ď δ}F }Lip ˇ G{Γ ˇ ˇ ż ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ holds for all arithmeticˇ progressions P Ă rNs ˇof length at least δN.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 13 / 58 Linear sequences

Definition (Linear sequences) A linear sequence in a group G is any sequence g : Z Ñ G of the form gpnq :“ anx for some a, x P G.A linear sequence in a nilmanifold G{Γ is a sequence of the form tgpnqΓunPZ, where g : Z Ñ G is a linear sequence in G.

m m In the case G “ R ,Γ “ Z , a linear sequence takes the form m an ` x mod Z .

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 14 / 58 Qualitative Kronecker

Theorem (Qualitative Kronecker theorem) m Let m ě 1, and let pgpnq mod Z qnPN be a linear sequence in the torus m m R {Z . Then exactly one of the following statements is true: m m m 1 pgpnq mod Z q is equidistributed in R {Z m 2 There exists a non-trivial character η : R Ñ R{Z which annihilates m Z but does not vanish entirely, such that η ˝ g is constant.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 15 / 58 Horizontal torus

Definition (Horizontal torus) Given a nilmanifold G{Γ, the horizontal torus is defined to be m m pG{Γqab :“ G{rG, GsΓ. This torus is isomorphic to R ab {Z ab where mab “ dimpGq ´ dimprG, Gsq. A horizontal character is a continuous homomorphism η : G Ñ R{Z which annihilates Γ. Note that η in fact annihilates rG, GsΓ. A horizontal character is non-trivial if it does not vanish identically. Given a Mal’cev basis X for G{Γ, a horizontal character η may be m written ηpgq “ k ¨ ψpgq for some unique k P Z . The norm of η is }η} :“}k}.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 16 / 58 The Heisenberg nilmanifold

Example 1 0 R Let G{Γ be the Heisenberg nilmanifold. Then rG, Gs “ 0 1 0 . ¨ 0 0 1 ˛ 2 2 Then pG{Γqab may be identified with R {Z , with projection˝ map π given‚ by 1 x1 x2 π 0 1 x3 :“ px1, x3q. »¨ 0 0 1 ˛fi –˝ ‚fl

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 17 / 58 Leon Green’s theorem

Leon Green proved the following generalization to Kronecker’s theorem in the case of a linear orbit in a nilmanifold. Theorem (Leon Green’s theorem)

Let tgpnqΓunPZ be a linear sequence in a nilmanifold G{Γ. Then exactly one of the following statements is true:

1 tgpnqΓunPN is equidistributed in G{Γ 2 There is a nontrivial horizontal character η : G{Γ Ñ R{Z such that η ˝ g is a constant.

In other words, a linear sequence is equidistributed in a nilmanifold if and only if the sequence projected to the abelianization is equidistributed there.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 18 / 58 Leon Green’s theorem

Example Write txu “ x ´ txu. The linear sequence

n n 1 α 0 1 nα 2 αβ g “ 0 1 β “ 0 1 nβ n ` ˘ ¨0 0 1˛ ¨0 0 1 ˛ ˝ ‚ ˝ ‚ has reduction into a fundamental domain for the Heisenberg nilmanifold G{Γ given by

n 1 tnαu 2 αβ ´ nαtnβu g Γ “ 0 1 tnβu Γ. n ` ˘ ( ¨0 0 1 ˛ ˝ ‚ By Leon Green’s theorem, this sequence is equidistributed in G{Γ if and only if p1, α, βq are linearly independent over Q.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 19 / 58 Polynomial sequences

Definition (Polynomial sequences)

Let G be a with filtration G˚. Let g : Z Ñ G be a ´1 sequence. If h P Z, write Dhgpnq :“ gpn ` hqgpnq . (This differs slightly from last lecture.)

We say that g is a polynomial sequence with coefficients in G˚, and

write g P polypZ, G˚q, if Dhi ¨ ¨ ¨ Dh1 g takes values in Gi for all i P Zą0 and all h1, ..., hi P Z.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 20 / 58 Leibman’s theorem

Leibman proved the following generalization of Leon Green’s theorem. Theorem (Leibman’s theorem) Suppose that G{Γ is a nilmanifold and that g : Z Ñ G is a polynomial sequence. Then exactly one of the following statements is true:

1 tgpnqΓunPN is equidistributed in G{Γ. 2 There exists a nontrivial horizontal character η : G Ñ R{Z such that η ˝ g is constant.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 21 / 58 Quantitative Leibman’s theorem

Green and Tao prove the following quantitative form of Leibman’s theorem. Theorem (Quantitative Leibman theorem)

Let G{Γ be an m-dimensional nilmanifold with filtration G˚ of degree d 1 and a δ -rational Mal’cev basis X . Suppose that g P polypZ, G˚q. Then at least one of the following statements is true.

1 tgpnqΓunPrNs is δ-equidistributed in G{Γ 2 There is a non-trivial horizontal character η : G{Γ Ñ R{Z with }η}! δ´Om,d p1q such that

δ´Om,d p1q }η ˝ gpnq ´ η ˝ gpn ´ 1q} ! R{Z N for all n P t1, ..., Nu.

For x P R, }x}R{Z is the distance to the nearest integer.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 22 / 58 Example

Example 1 δ Let G “ R,Γ “ Z and gpnq “ p 2 ` σqn where 0 ă σ ď 100 is a parameter. 1 If N is much larger than σ then tgpnq mod ZunPrNs is δ-equidistributed. 1 If N is much smaller than σ then tgpnq mod ZunPrNs fails to be 1 equidistributed as it is concentrated near 0 and 2 . The character ηpxq “ 2x mod 1 satisfies 1 }η ˝ gpnq ´ η ˝ gpn ´ 1q} ! . R{Z N

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 23 / 58 Rational sequences

Definition Let G{Γ be a nilmanifold, and let Q ą 0 be a parameter. We say that γ P G is Q-rational if γr P Γ for some integer r, 0 ă r ď Q. A Q-rational point is any point in G{Γ of the form γΓ for some Q-rational group element γ.

A sequence tγpnqunPZ is Q-rational if every element γpnqΓ in the sequence is a Q-rational point.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 24 / 58 Rational subgroups

Definition Let Q ą 0. Suppose a nilmanifold G{Γ is given with Mal’cev basis X “ tX1, ..., Xmu. Suppose that G 1 Ă G is a closed connected subgroup. We say that G 1 is Q-rational relative to X if the Lie algebra g1 has a basis 1 1 1 m X “ tX1, ..., Xm1 u consisting of linear combinations i“1 ai Xi where the ai are rational numbers of height at most Q. ř

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 25 / 58 Smooth sequences

Definition Let G{Γ be a nilmanifold with a Mal’cev basis X , and let M, N ě 1. We say that the sequence tpnqunPZ in G is pM, Nq-smooth if we have

dppnq, 1G q ď M

and M dppnq, pn ´ 1qq ď N for all n P rNs.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 26 / 58 Factorization theorem

Green and Tao prove the following factorization theorem as part of their program giving an asymptotic for the number of k-term arithmetic progressions in the prime numbers less than X .

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 27 / 58 Factorization theorem

Theorem (Factorization theorem)

Let m, d ě 0, and let M0, N ě 1 and A ą 0 be real numbers. Suppose that G{Γ is an m-dimensional nilmanifold with a filtration G˚ of degree d

Suppose that X is an M0-rational Mal’cev basis adapted to G˚ and that g P polypZ, G˚q.

OA,m,d p1q Then there is an integer M with M0 ď M ! M0 , a rational subgroup G 1 Ă G, a Mal’cev basis X 1 for G 1{pG 1 X Γq, and a 1 decomposition g “ g γ into sequences in polypZ, G˚q satisfying 1  : Z Ñ G is pM, Nq-smooth 1 1 1 1 A 2 g : Z Ñ G satisfies tg pnqΓ unPrNs is totally 1{M -equidistributed 3 γ : Z Ñ G is M-rational, and tγpnqΓunPZ is periodic with period at most M.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 28 / 58 Quantitative Kronecker Theorem

As a warm-up we prove the following quantitative Kronecker Theorem. Theorem (Quantitative Kronecker Theorem) 1 m Let m ě 1, let 0 ă δ ă 2 , and let α P R . If the sequence m m m tαn mod Z unPrNs is not δ-equidistributed in the additive torus R {Z , m O 1 then there exists k P Z with 0 ă |k| ! δ´ mp q such that δ´Omp1q }k ¨ α}R{Z ! N .

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 29 / 58 Quantitative Kronecker Theorem

Proof. m Suppose that tαn mod Z unPrNs is not δ-equidistributed. Thus there m m exists a Lipschitz function F : R {Z Ñ R, }F }Lip “ 1

EnPrNsrF pαnqs ´ Fdθ ą δ. ˇ Rm{Zm ˇ ˇ ż ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ After replacing δ withˇ δ{2 and translating F byˇ a constant and rescaling, we can assume F “ 0. Also, we may assume that F is smooth. ş

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 30 / 58 Quantitative Kronecker Theorem

Proof.

m m ` 1Q 1Q Fej´erkernel K : R {Z Ñ R , Kpθq :“ measpQq ˚ measpQq pθq, where δ δ m m m m Q :“ ´ 16m , 16m Ă R {Z has F.T., for k P Z ,

“ ‰ 2 m sin πki δ Kˆpkq “ 8m , πki δ i“1 ˜ 8m ¸ ź where the ratio is interpretted as 1 where ki “ 0. Bounding the numerator by 1, for M ě 1,

´2m ´1 |Kˆpkq| !m δ M . k m, k M PZ ÿ} }2ą

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 31 / 58 Quantitative Kronecker Theorem

Proof. ˆ Bound |F pkq| ď }F }8 ď }F }Lip ď 1.

Set F1 :“ F ˚ K. Since }F }Lip “ 1 and K is supported in Q, δ }F ´ F } ď . 1 8 8

´2m´1 Choose M :“ Cmδ for m sufficiently large, and set

F2pθq :“ Fˆ1pkqepk ¨ θq. k m:0 k M PZ ÿă} }2ď δ Thus }F1 ´ F2}8 ď 8 .

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 32 / 58 Quantitative Kronecker Theorem

Proof. We’ve arranged that δ E rF pnαqs ě . nPrNs 2 4 ˇ ˇ Thus there exists some kˇ , 0 ă |k| ď M ˇsuch that

´m Omp1q EnPrNsrepnk ¨ αqs "m δM " δ . ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ 1 The geometric series bound EnPrNsrepntqs ! min 1, N t implies } }R{Z ˇ ˇ ´ ¯ ˇ δ´Omˇ p1q }k ¨ α} ! . R{Z m N

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 33 / 58 Strongly recurrent sequences

The following one-dimensional version of Kronecker’s theorem gives extra information in the case that a small interval is hit often. Lemma 1 δ Let α P R, 0 ă δ ă 2 , 0 ă  ď 2 , and let I Ă R{Z be an interval of length . If αn P I for at least δN values of n P rNs then there is some k P Z with 0 ă |k| ! δ´Op1q such that

δ´Op1q }kα} ! . R{Z N

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 34 / 58 Strongly recurrent sequences

Proof. By choosing a function F which is a piecewise linear approximation to δ2 I one can check that tαn mod 1unPrNs is not 10 equidistributed. ´Op1q δ´Op1q Choose 0 ‰ k P Z such that |k| ! δ and }kα}R{Z ! N .

Let β “}kα}R{Z, and assume β ‰ 0, since otherwise we’re done.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 35 / 58 Strongly recurrent sequences

Proof. 1 1 As n ranges over an interval of integers J of length at most β , the 1 numbers αpn0 ` qn qZ are increasing through a fundamental domain  for R{Z, and thus the number that land in I is at most 1 ` β . Divide rNs into at most 2k ` βN progressions of form 1 1 tn0 ` kn : n P Ju to obtain

 δN ď #tn P rNs : αn mod 1 P I u ď 1 ` p2k ` βNq β ˆ ˙ k ! k ` ` βN ` N. β

We can assume that N ě δ´Op1q and that  ă δOp1q. The only term k that is relevant is δN ! β , which gives the claim.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 36 / 58 Vertical torus

Definition

Let G{Γ be a nilmanifold and G˚ a filtration of degree d. Then Gd is in the of G.

The vertical torus is Gd {pΓ X Gd q.

The vertical dimension is md “ dim Gd A vertical character is a continuous homomorphism ξ : Gd {pΓ X Gd q Ñ R{Z. Such a character has the form ξpxq “ k ¨ x, d k P Z , by identifying Gd with the last md Mal’cev coordinates. Let F : G{Γ Ñ C be a Lipschitz function and let ξ be a vertical character. F has vertical oscillation ξ if

F pgd ¨ xq “ epξpgd qqF pxq, gd P Gd , x P G{Γ.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 37 / 58 Equidistribution in subspaces

Definition

Let g : Z Ñ G be a polynomial sequence. We say that tgpnqΓunPrNs is δ-equidistributed along a vertical character ξ if

EnPrNsrF pgpnqΓqs ´ F pxqdx ď δ}F }Lip ˇ G{Γ ˇ ˇ ż ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ for all Lipschitzˇ functions F : G{Γ Ñ C with verticalˇ oscillation ξ.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 38 / 58 Vertical oscillation reduction

Lemma

Let G{Γ be a nilmanifold with filtration G˚ of degree d. 1 Let md be the vertical dimension, and let 0 ă δ ď 2 . Suppose that g : Z Ñ G is a polynomial sequence and that tgpnqΓunPrNs is not δ-equidistributed. ´O p1q Then there is a vertical character ξ with |ξ| ! δ md such that Om p1q tgpnqΓunPrNs is not δ d -equidistributed along the vertical frequency ξ.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 39 / 58 Vertical oscillation reduction

Proof. This follows as in the quantitative Kronecker theorem. δ Replacing δ with 2 , assume G{Γ F “ 0, }F }Lip “ 1 and F is smooth. Let K be the md dimensionş Fej´erkernel. Convolve with K in Gd {pΓ X Gd q fibers to obtain

F1pyq :“ F pθyqKpθqdθ m m żR d {Z d

^ ´2md ´1 Write F y d F y; k Kˆ k and (Q C δ ) 1p q “ kPZ p q p q “ md

ř ^ F2pyq :“ F py; kqKˆpkq k md : k Q PZ ÿ} }ď δ Since }F ´ F2}8 ď 4 , the argument goes through as before.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 40 / 58 van der Corput’s inequality

Theorem (van der Corput’s inequality)

Let N, H be positive integers and suppose that tanunPrNs is a sequence of complex numbers. Extend tanu to all of Z by defining an :“ 0 for n R rNs.

2 N ` H |h| E ra s ď 1 ´ E ra a s. nPrNs n HN H nPrNs n n`h |h|ďH ˆ ˙ ˇ ˇ ÿ ˇ ˇ In the classical theory of oscillating sums n epPpnqq, van der Corput’s inequality is used to reduce the degree of the polynomial P. ř

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 41 / 58 van der Corput’s inequality

Proof of van der Corput’s inequality. 1 H´1 Write n an “ H ´HănďN h“0 an`h. By Cauchy-Schwarz,

ř ř 2 ř 2 1 H´1 an “ 2 an`h ˇ ˇ H ˇ ˇ ˇ n ˇ ˇ´HănďN h“0 ˇ ˇÿ ˇ ˇ ÿ ÿ ˇ 2 ˇ ˇ ˇ H´1 ˇ ˇ ˇ N `ˇ H ˇ ď 2 an`h H ˇ ˇ ´HănďN ˇ h“0 ˇ ÿ ˇ ÿ ˇ N ` H ˇH´1 ˇ “ ˇ a ˇa 1 . H2 n`h n`h ´HănďN h,h1“0 ÿ ÿ This rearranges to the claimed inequality.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 42 / 58 van der Corput’s inequality

Theorem

Let N be a positive integer, and suppose that tanunPrNs is a sequence of complex numbers with |an| ď 1. Extend tanu to all of Z by defining an :“ 0 when n R rNs. Suppose that 0 ă δ ă 1 and that

EnPrNsrans ě δ.

δ2N ˇ ˇ Then for at least 8 values ofˇ h P rNs,ˇ we have δ2 E ra a s ě . nPrNs n`h n 8 ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 43 / 58 van der Corput’s inequality

Proof. 4 We can assume that N ď δ2 . The proof is by contradiction. Choose H “ N in the previous theorem to obtain

2 2 δ2 ď E a ď E ra a s nPrNs n N nPrNs n n`h |h|ďN ˇ ˇ ÿ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ 2 ˇ δ2N δ2Nˇ ď 1 ` 2 ` . N 8 8 ˆ ˆ ˙˙ Rearranging produces the inequality.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 44 / 58 The Heisenberg nilmanifold

0 RR The Heisenberg group has Lie algebra g “ 0 0 R . The ¨ 0 0 0 ˛ exponential map is given by ˝ ‚

xz 0 x y 1 x y ` 2 exp 0 0 z “ 0 1 z ¨ 0 0 0 ˛ ¨ 0 0 1 ˛ ˝ ‚ ˝ xz ‚ 1 x y 0 x y ´ 2 log 0 1 z “ 0 0 z . ¨ 0 0 1 ˛ ¨ 0 0 0 ˛ ˝ ‚ ˝ ‚

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 45 / 58 The Heisenberg nilmanifold

Let 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 X1 :“ 0 0 0 , X2 :“ 0 0 1 , X3 :“ 0 0 0 . ¨0 0 0˛ ¨0 0 0˛ ¨0 0 0˛ ˝ ‚ ˝ ‚ ˝ ‚ X “ tX1, X2, X3u is a Mal’cev basis adapted to the lcs filtration G˚,

1 t1 t1t2 ` t3 exppt1X1q exppt2X2q exppt3X3q “ 0 1 t2 . ¨0 0 1 ˛ The Mal’cev coordinate map is ˝ ‚ 1 x y ψ 0 1 z “ px, z, y ´ xzq. ¨0 0 1˛ ˝ ‚ 1 x y Projection onto the horizontal torus is given by π 0 1 z “ px, zq. ¨0 0 1˛ Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 ˝ ‚April 6, 2017 46 / 58 Heisenberg case

We prove the main theorem in the special case of a linear sequence in the Heisenberg nilmanifold. This already illustrates many of the essential ingredients of the more general proof. Theorem Let G{Γ be the Heisenberg nilmanifold with Mal’cev basis given, and n let g : Z Ñ G be a linear sequence gpnq “ a . Let δ ą 0 be a parameter and let N ě 1 be an integer.

Then either tgpnqΓunPrNs is δ-equidistributed, or else there is a horizontal ´Op1q δ´Op1q character η with 0 ă |η| ! δ such that }ηpaq}R{Z ! N .

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 47 / 58 Heisenberg case

Proof. Assume that the sequence is not δ-equidistributed. Applying the vertical frequency decomposition, there exists F : G{Γ Ñ C, ´Op1q }F }Lip “ 1 of vertical frequency ξ with }ξ}! δ , such that

n Op1q EnPrNsrF pa Γqs ´ F pxqdx " δ . ˇ G{Γ ˇ ˇ ż ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˜ 2 2 If ξ ” 0 then Fˇ is G2-invariant, so there existsˇ F : R {Z Ñ C such that F pxq “ F˜pπpxqq. One has }F˜}Lip ď 1 and

˜ ˜ Op1q ˜ EnPrNs F pnπpaqq ´ F pxqdx " δ }F }Lip. ˇ R2{Z2 ˇ ˇ ż ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ The claimˇ now follows from Kronecker’s theorem.ˇ

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 48 / 58 Heisenberg case

Proof.

If ξ ı 0 then F is mean zero, by integrating in the G2 direction. Hence n Op1q EnPrNsrF pa Γqs ě δ . By van der Corput thereˇ are δOp1qNˇ values of h N such that ˇ " ˇ P r s

n`h n Op1q EnPrNsrF pa ΓqF pa Γqs " δ . ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ 3 Given g P G, writeˇ g “ tgurgs, where ψptgˇ uq P r0, 1q and rgs P Γ. Hence the expectation is

n h n Op1q EnPrNsrF pa ta uΓqF pa Γqs " δ . ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 49 / 58 Heisenberg case

Proof. ˜ 2 2 Let Fh : G {Γ Ñ C defined by

h F˜hpx, yq :“ F pta uxqF pyq.

Thus the expectation may be written

˜ n 2 Op1q EnPrNs Fhpa˜hqΓ " δ ˇ ” ıˇ h ´1 ˇ h ˇ wherea ˜h :“ pta u aˇta u, aq. ˇ ´1 h ´1 h h Notice a ta u ata u “ a, ta u P G2, soa ˜h lies in the subgroup G ˝ “ G ˆ G :“ tpg, g 1q : g ´1g 1 P G u of G 2. G2 “ ‰ 2

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 50 / 58 Heisenberg case

Proof. We can check that the subgroup of G ˝ is ∆ 1 1 ˝ G2 “ tpg2, g2q : g2 P G2u as follows. Let pg, g q, ph, h q P G . Then 1 1 1 1 2 rpg, g q, ph, h qs “ prg, hs, rg , h sq P G2 . We have, since G2 is in the center,

rg, hsrg 1, h1s´1 “ g ´1h´1ghph1q´1pg 1q´1h1g 1 “ hph1q´1gpg 1q´1h´1h1g ´1g 1 “ 1.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 51 / 58 Heisenberg case

Proof. ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ A Mal’cev basis for G {Γ , X “ tX1 , X2 , X3 , X4 u

0 1 t0, 0u 0 0 t0, 0u 0 0 t1, 0u 0 0 t1, 1u ˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ X1 “ 0 0 0 , X2 “ 0 0 1 , X3 “ 0 0 0 , X4 “ 0 0 0 ¨0 0 0 ˛ ¨0 0 0 ˛ ¨0 0 0 ˛ ¨0 0 0 ˛ ˝ ‚ ˝ ‚ ˝ ‚ ˝ ‚ where

0 x ty, y 1u 0 x y 0 x y 1 0 0 z :“ 0 0 z , 0 0 z . ¨0 0 0 ˛ ¨¨0 0 0˛ ¨0 0 0 ˛˛ ˝ ‚ ˝˝ ‚ ˝ ‚‚ 3 3 Projection onto the horizontal torus R {Z is given by projection onto the first three coordinates.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 52 / 58 Heisenberg case

Proof. ˝ ˝ ˜ ˝ Write Fh and ah for the restrictions of Fh anda ˜h to G and write ˝ ˝ ˝ Γ :“ Γ ˆΓXG2 Γ. Integrating in the X3 direction shows that Fh is mean zero. Check that

˝ 1 h 1 Fh ppg2, g2q ¨ pg, g qq “ F pta ug2gqF pg2g q h 1 ˝ 1 “ ξpg2qξpg2qF pta ugqF pg q “ Fh ppg, g qq

˝ ˝ ˝ ˝ so Fh is rG , G s-invariant, and so factors through the projection π to the abelianization. 1 3 3 1 ˝ ˝ ˝ 1 Write Fh : R {Z Ñ C defined by Fhpπ pxqq “ Fh pxΓ q. We have Fh is mean zero and has Lipschitz norm bounded by 1.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 53 / 58 Heisenberg case

Proof. Since 1 ˝ ˝ Op1q EnPrNsrFhpnπ pahqqs " δ Op1q ˝ 3 we obtain that for "ˇ δ N values of h thereˇ exists kh P Z , ˝ ´Op1q ˇ ˇ 0 ă |kh | ! δ such that

δ´Op1q }k˝ ¨ π˝pa˝q} ! . h h R{Z N ˝ Picking the most common values of kh , the same conclusion holds for a single k˝. Let η : G ˝{Γ˝ Ñ R{Z be defined as ηpxq :“ k˝ ¨ π˝pxq.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 54 / 58 Heisenberg case

Proof. Notice that by decomposing along the first two coordinates in the 1 1 ´1 Mal’cev basis, we can write ηpg , gq “ η1pgq ` η2pg g q where η1 is a horizontal character of G and η2 : G2{pΓ X G2q Ñ R{Z. h Calculate ηpa˜hq “ η1paq ` η2pra, ta usq.

In coordinates, if ψpxq “ pt1, t2, t3q and ψpyq “ pu1, u2, u3q then ψprx, ysq “ p0, 0, t1u2 ´ t2u1q. If ψpaq “ pγ1, γ2, ˚q then h ψpta uq “ ptγ1hu, tγ2hu, ˚q.

Set γ :“ pγ1, γ2q “ πpaq, ζ :“ p´γ2, γ1q and observe Omp1q ηpa˜hq “ k1 ¨ γ ` k2ζ ¨ tγhu so that for " δ N values of h P rNs

δ´Op1q }k ¨ γ ` k ζ ¨ tγhu} ! . 1 2 R{Z N

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 55 / 58 Bracket polynomial lemma

The proof is now completed by the following ‘bracket polynomial lemma.’ Lemma 2 2 Let δ P p0, 1q and let N ě 1 be an integer. Let θ P R, γ P R {Z and 2 ζ P R satisfy |ζ| ! 1. Suppose that for at least δN values of h P rNs, we have 1 }θ ` ζ ¨ tγhu} ď . R{Z δN δ´Op1q 2 ´Op1q Then either θ, |ζ| ! N or else there is k P Z , 0 ă }k}! δ such δ´Op1q that }k ¨ γ}R{Z ! N .

In either case we obtain a horizontal character k, 0 ă }k}! δ´Op1q on δ´Op1q G{Γ satisfying }k ¨ γ}R{Z ! N .

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 56 / 58 Bracket polynomial lemma

Proof. We may assume that δ }θ ` ζ ¨ tγhu} ď }ζ} R{Z 10 8 for at least δN values h P rNs, or otherwise the first conclusion holds. Define δ Ω:“ t P 2{ 2 : }θ ` ζ ¨ ttu} ď }ζ} R Z R{Z 10 8 " * and δ Ω:˜ “ x P 2{ 2 : dpx, Ωq ă . R Z 10 " * ˜ δ By slicing, one finds |Ω| ă 2 .

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 57 / 58 Bracket polynomial lemma

Proof. 2 2 Define F : R {Z Ñ Rě0, 10dpx, Ωq F pxq :“ max 1 ´ , 0 . δ ˆ ˙

Since F is 1 on Ω, EnPrNsrF pγnqs ě δ. ˜ δ Since F is supported on Ω, 2 2 F pxqdx ă . R {Z 2 Thus ş δ EnPrNsrF pγnqs ´ F pxqdx ě . ˇ R2{Z2 ˇ 2 ˇ ż ˇ ˇ ˇ Since }F } ! 1ˇ we find that tγnu is not cˇδ2-equidistributed for Lip δˇ nPrNs ˇ some c ą 0, and the conclusion follows.

Bob Hough Math 639: Lecture 16 April 6, 2017 58 / 58