Chapter VI CONCLUSION
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Chapter VI CONCLUSION In the conclusion of this thesis, a summary of the preceding chapters is presented. The observations by the researcher are made from four perspectives in this chapter: VI.1. A summary of the previous chapters and concluding remarks The Buddha says: ―Whoever sees dependent origination sees the dharma; whoever sees the dharma sees dependent origination.‖252 Dependent Origination (pratītya-samutpāda) is an important religious aspect of the Buddha‘s enlightenment. When the five monks heard the Buddha‘s preach, his first sermon and heard about the Four Noble Truths, they saw the dharma and realized the pratītya-samutpāda. The term dharma comes from the root ‗dhṛ‘ which means ‗to hold or keep‘. From that root ancient up to now, the meaning of this term does not change. It thus was applied to the ideas and norms that maintained the social and moral order. Besides, the dharma is known as good, virtue, and truth, from ancient times in India the term ‗dharma‘ was used to refer to the customs and duties observed by people, in other words, to the social order. In Buddhism, the term dharma not only described with all these meanings 252 ―Yo paṭiccasamuppādaṃ passati so dhammaṃ passati; yo dhammaṃ passati so paṭiccasamuppādaṃ passatīti.‖ Mn. i. 191. Mahāhatthipadopamasutta (tr.) PTS. reprint 2004, Vol. 1, p. 237. 195 but also described doctrines (Buddha‘s teachings) in Sūtra-piṭaka, events, phenomena, everything as well as states operates of body, matter (rūpa) and mind, mental (citta, caitta) in Abhidharma-piṭaka. The nature of dharma is emptiness (śūnyatā), dependent origination (pratītya-samutpāda), Impermanence (anitya), suffering (duḥkha) and no- self (anātman). The Buddha, Dharma (Buddha‘s teachings), and the Saṅgha (community of believers) is the Three Jewels (Triratna) to which Buddhists go for refuge. The term dharma in the plural is used to describe the interrelated elements that create the empirical world. Firstly, dharma, which is described in Buddhist terms are the teachings of the Buddha, duty, law, doctrine and things, events, phenomena, everything. At the same time it refers to the truth or to nirvāṇa that is shown through the teaching of the Buddha. Secondly, meaning of dharma occurs when the term is used in the sense of cause (hetu), as in good or evil dharmas. The third meaning of dharma is ‗characteristic‘ (guṇa or laskṣana). And finally, the dharma used as meaning ‗thing‘ is peculiar to Buddhism. The dharma in the Buddha‘s teachings realized in his enlightenment is included in this usage. When the Buddha realized enlightenment, he is understood nirvāṇa. Nirvāṇa is truth and real existence. In the sense that it really exists, nirvāṇa is included as a dharma. Generally speaking, in Buddhism, the number of dharma is not fixed. Nor is the term dharma limited to just the basic elements of existence. Buddhism tried to explain individual existence through theories about dharmas and thus saw their existence as reduced to physical and mental dharmas. These dharmas were not substantial, eternally existing entities. They arose through dependent origination (pratītya-samutpāda-dharma). 196 In Early Buddhism, objects and individuals as they appear to us are not considered dharmas. Rather, dharmas are the fundamental existents of which phenomena (such as objects and individuals) are composed. For example, the five aggregates (skandhas) of which a person is composed (form, sensation, perception, mental formations, and consciousness) are considered to be dharma. However, the aggregates of form (rūpa) and mental phenomena (saṃskāra) can be further classified and subdivided into additional dharmas. Rūpa refers to both the body and material objects. For the body, five dharmas referring to the five senses are listed: eye, ear, nose, tongue, and body. Here the body refers to the basis of tactile sensations. Since this category includes all parts of the body, it is equivalent to the physical body. The other sense organs, such as the eye, all have the physical body as their base. Because it was felt that the physiological and mental aspects of the physical body could be explained through these five sense organs (indriya), they were considered to be dharmas. The dharma related to the mind was included in the category of mental formations (saṃskāra) when categorized according to the five aggregates. Such dharmas as act of attention (manaskāra), intellect (mati), and mindfulness (smṛti) were also listed in this group. Attitudes such as belief (śraddhā) and assiduous striving (vīrya) were treated as having the power to influence the mind and thus were considered in this group. Defilements (kleśa) such as lust (rāga), hatred (pratigha), pride (māna), doubt (vicikitsā), and wrong views (dṛṣṭi) were dharmas. In addition, thirst (tṛṣṇā) and ignorance (avidyā) were considered to be dharmas because they had specific powers over the mind that could be distinguished from the powers of other dharmas. The identities of a number of different dharmas were determined using this type of 197 reasoning. In some of the later passages in the Āgamas, dharmas were classified according to the five aggregates (skandhas), the twelve bases (āyatanas), and the eighteen elements (dhātus). Various types of dharmas or elements of existence discussed within the abhidharma tradition have been reviewed above. The Sarvāstivāda school classified these dharmas in to five groups: form (rūpa), mind (citta), mental faculties (caitta), forces not concomitant with the mind (citta- viprayukta-saṃskārā), and unconditioned dharma (asaṃskṛta). Later, this classification system explained detail in the Abhidharmakośa. In this text, form, mind, mental faculties, and the force not concomitant with the mind; these four groups are called conditioned dharma (saṃskṛta). The fifth group is unconditioned dharma, which is contrasted with the first four, and the contents of each group of dharmas were definitive determined detail in the Abhidharmakośa, they are as follows: form (rūpa) consists of eleven dharmas, mind (citta) has one dharma, mental faculties (caitta) consists of forty six dharmas, forces not concomitant with the mind (citta-viprayukta- saṃskārā) consists of fourteen dharmas, and unconditioned dharma (asaṃskṛta) consists of three dharmas. This research is continued with relationship of dharma in the Abhidharmakośa and Yogācāra texts. As we know, Vasubandhu is an author of Abhidharmakośa and also as the one who co-founded the Yogācāra system with his brother Asaṅga. Almost all Buddhist scholars know the relation between Abhidharmakośa with Yogācāra (vijñānavāda) that is the development of dharma from 75 dharmas of Abhidharmakośa to 100 dharmas in Yogācāra of Vasubandhu. This is the development throughout stream flow of mind-consciousness from Sarvāstivāda of Hinayāna to Yogācāra of Mahāyāna Buddhism. Additionly, in the 198 practical aspects of dharma with religious life should be understood the relevance of the theory of dharma to hetu, pratyaya, and phala. From this whole discussion, one can know the contribution of the theory of dharma to philosophy and psychology and the path of cultivation (Bhāvanā- mārga) self transformation through the understanding of dharma. Although Vasubandhu wrote Abhidharmakośa from the point of view of Vaibhāṣika, later finding the Vaibhāṣika position unacceptable he wrote his commentary (bhāṣya) on the same Abhidharmakośa from Sautrāntika point of view. Thus, in the Abhidharmakośa sources distinguish seventy-five dharmas in total, consists of seventy-two conditioned dharmas (saṃskṛta) and three unconditioned dharmas (asaṃskṛta), these three are not subject to the law of causality and so do not pass through the phases of production (jāti), duration (sthiti), decay (jarā), and destruction (anityatā) which affects all conditioned phenomena. Generally speaking, there are three points which we have to take into special consideration with regard to the Abhidharmakośa text. (1) The Abhidharmakośa occupies an important place in the history of the Sarvāstivāda abhidharma literature. (2) It is related to the development of Indian Buddhist thought in Mahāyāna. (3) It has a special meaning as a text book of the fundamental doctrines of Buddhism. With regard to the first point, it may be said that the Abhidharmakośa completely systematized the Sarvāstivāda doctrine. It also marked an advance in Sarvāstivāda doctrine and it introduced Sautrāntika views. Besides, it is also corresponds with exposition of the Pāli abhidhamma in Buddhist philosophy of Theravādins. 199 VI.2. The Contribution of the Abhidharmakośa to the Buddhist Philosophy of Dharma The history of the Buddhist Philosophy was brightly marked by the appearance of the work Abhidharmakośa of Vasubandhu. The work is an encyclopedia of Buddhist Philosophy and it was written originally from the point of view of the Vaibhāṣika, branch of the Sarvāstivāda school, which was dominant in Kashmir. Abhidharmakośa is not only mere collection of the important principles and doctrines but also an analysis of dharma in Sūtra-piṭaka and Abhidharma-piṭaka. Especially, in Abhidharma-piṭaka the important principles and doctrines are intertwined in such a way that the teaching of Lord Buddha can easily be explained and explicate. Hence, it could be said that Abhidharmakośa is not a random selection but it is that kind of collection in the Abhidharma-piṭaka, which provides a wide horizon to the Buddha‘s teachings. So it can be said that Vasubandhu‘s Abhidharmakośa is a critical study of Abhidharma-piṭaka.