128 Million Annually and Garbage Is Piling

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

128 Million Annually and Garbage Is Piling TREASURY LOANS: LBP 3,200 BILLION IN FIVE YEARS Cost of Beirut international airport February 2011 | 103 China’s growing economy, a threat to the U.S.? The Monthly interviews Nada Al - Assaad issue number www.iimonthly.com • Published by Information International sal $128 MILLION ANNUALLY AND GARBAGE IS PILING Lebanon 5,000LL | Saudi Arabia 15SR | UAE 15DHR | Jordan 2JD| Syria 75SYP | Iraq 3,500IQD | Kuwait 1.5KD | Qatar 15QR | Bahrain 2BD | Oman 2OR | Yemen 15YRI | Egypt 10EP | Europe 5Euros INDEX 4 LEADER: $128 MILLION ANNUALLY FOR SUKLEEN AND SUKOMI 9 Treasury loans 16 Cost of Beirut international airport 17 The Ministry of the Displaced 19 The Ministry of Youth and Sports 21 Immunity of Judges and Members of the Constitutional Council 22 Adoption 23 Syndicate of Photojournalists in Lebanon Page 30 25 Lycée Abdel Kader 27 Scalp Hair Loss by Dr. Hanna Saadah 28 Supersizing Working Memory by Dr. Samar Zebian 29 Waiting for the letter and a response by Antoine Boutros Page 23 30 The Monthly interviews Nada Al-Assaad 32 Popular culture 38 Samir Geagea after the Civil War 33 Myth #42: Arab Salvation Army 39 December 2010 Timeline in Lebanon 34 Must-read books: Warlords and Merchants 42 Global Peace Index 2010 35 Must-read children’s book: “Let’s Have Fun and Discover Downtown Beirut” 43 China’s growing economy, a threat to the U.S.? 36 Lebanon Families: Khawli Family 47 Real estate index in Lebanon- 37 Discover Lebanon: Kabrikha December 2010 48 Food Price Index - December 2010 50 Nobel Prizes 50 Beirut Rafic Hariri International Airport - December 2010 51 Lebanon stats 3 | EDITORIAL DRAINS ere is the Mufti performing the rain prayer and the sky has answered. The roads are flooded, which begs the obvious question: if you don’t Hhave drains, why pray for rain? At a time when public debt and Sukleen garbage are piling-up and public money is going down the drain, along with all public facilities, another question emerges: why can’t we block these drains? * Sukleen, Lafayette and NTCC = $2 billion DRAIN NO. 1 More than $1.5 billion have been spent to collect and pile garbage on sea shores and valleys in Beirut, Saida and Trablous with total oblivion to its harm to man and the environment in addition to an estimated loss of $500 million for not recycling waste, because we did not implement a comprehensive solid waste treatment plan for Lebanon. This is how we have drained $2 billion since 1992. Water = $8 billion DRAIN NO. 2 More than $600 million are paid annually by households and offices to bottled water companies because our water is polluted and the network is non existent. This is how we have drained $8 billion since 1992. Electricity = $12 billion DRAIN NO. 3 More than $400 million are paid annually to owners of generators in addition to a $600 million annual loss by the electricity sector, because Lebanon has yet to discover electricity. This is how we have drained $12 billion since 1992. Open sewers network=smile you are in Lebanon! DRAIN NO. 4 Open sewers flowing from the roads into rivers and seas. This should be an opportunity for our Zua’ama to look into. Blocked drains that ought to be open and open drains that ought to be blocked, this has been our story since 1920. And so the story goes. * The estimated amounts do not include interest. issue 103 - February 2011 4 | LEADER SUKLEEN COLLECTION AND DUMPING OF WASTE $128 MILLION ANNUALLY FOR SUKLEEN AND SUKOMI he issue of waste treatment in Lebanon is one of the environmental problems that governmental approaches have failed to solve despite the substantial funds spent to that end, especially to cover the cost of contracts Twith the Sukleen and Sukomi companies – which are the focus of this article. Size of solid waste in Lebanon The size of waste in Lebanon (domestic, industrial and In the absence of a medical waste) is estimated at around 4,000-4,200 tons/ “ day or around 1.5 million tons/year. It emerges from national plan, treatment the following: A Organic material: 60% and recycling initiatives A Carton: 10% A Plastic: 10% are also non-existent. A Glass: 5% A Fabric: 5% Recycling is limited to A Minerals and other substances: 5% around 400 tons of waste This waste is distributed by muhafazat as follows: A Beirut and Mount Lebanon: 2,300 tons a day or 10% A North and A’akkar: 700 tons A Beqa’a and Ba’albeck-Hermel: 400 tons A South and Nabatieh: 600 tons random containers or to dumpsters” and sanitary landfills that were designed according to technical criteria that The problem prevent it from contaminating groundwater. However, Despite the large size of waste and its hazards, the the capacity of these landfills is limited. In light of the successive Lebanese governments have failed to draft absence of a treatment and recycling process, there is a a comprehensive national plan that covers the entirety continuous search for new landfills to contain the waste, of the Lebanese territory thus leaving the matter to the which increases when the population rises. Meanwhile, municipalities in most villages. These municipalities the adoption of a waste treatment and recycling plan collect and dump untreated and un-recycled waste in the for some 70-80% of waste would reduce the size of valleys and the outskirts of towns and villages. In Saida waste that is being transported to landfills or random and neighboring villages, NTCC (New Trading and dumpsters and thus contain the problem. Contracting Company) is responsible for this task while in Trablous and Mina al-Qalmoun, Lafayette is in charge This has led to an increase in the quantities of waste of waste collection. In Beirut and some 225 towns and dumped in landfills in Na’ameh from 200 tons/day to villages in Mount Lebanon, Sukleen took over the tasks 2,300 tons/day, accelerating a decline in the landfill’s of cleaning the streets and collecting waste while Sukomi ability to contain waste and forcing searches for an is in charge of treatment and landfilling. alternative landfill in a location near Beirut. In the absence of a national plan, treatment and What the companies in charge of waste and recycling initiatives are also non-existent. Recycling is municipalities are doing is to collect and transport limited to around 400 tons of waste a day or 10% of waste from the streets, cities and inner neighborhoods the total size of waste. Therefore, the process turns into to the outskirts. As such, they are in no way solving or one of transporting waste from streets and homes to treating the problem. issue 103 - The Monthly is published by Information International s.a.l. SUKLEEN LEADER | 5 Treatment plan Amid a cost increase and in the absence of a solution to the waste treatment problem, especially in Beirut and its surroundings, the Council of Ministers approved, by virtue of Decree No. 18 dated January 22, 1997, an emergency plan submitted by the Ministry of Environment. The plan was based on the following: A The rehabilitation of the A’amroussieh plant and the burning of around 600 tons/day of solid domestic waste A The rehabilitation of the Karantina plant to contain 1,100 tons of waste a day on condition that the waste would be treated by a process of sorting, burning and fermentation A The construction of a new fermentation center near Nahr Beirut A The compression of substances left in the two plants that cannot be recycled or fermented. These are estimated at around 200 tons/day and are to be placed in a sanitary landfill The above plan was never implemented for the following reasons: A No new fermentation centers were built with a capacity to treat 850 tons of waste a day. Therefore, the current capacity of 300 tons/day was maintained and the substances fermented, amounting to 310,000 tons/year, were sandblasted in the sanitary landfill in Na’ameh A Population growth causing an increase in the size of domestic waste, from 1,700 tons/day to 2,600 tons/day, requiring treatment Main contracts On March 10, 1994, contract No. 1348 was signed between the Council for Development and Reconstruction (CDR) and Sukleen. The contract included cleaning and waste collection in Beirut and some neighboring regions on condition that the government would provide the cost of the necessary machines and containers. The contract was later amended to expand the areas covered, as shown in Table 1. Table 1 demonstrates that the contracts were consensual and were signed at a low cost at the beginning, but later increased as waste collection and street cleaning expanded to include more areas. The cost increased from $4 million/year to $102 million/year and its funding was transferred from the CDR to the Independent Municipal Fund. Amendments to Contract No. 1348 Table 1 Initiation and Contract No. Company Cost (USD) Subject of the Funding Manner of assignment expiration contract dates Sukkar 1348 Engineering 3,597,283 Collection of domestic World Bank A rehabilitation process took place prior 1-1-1994 until Group waste in Greater Beirut and the CDR to bidding 31-12-1995 Sukkar Consensus between the Sectoral 1-9-1994 until 1348, annex 1 Engineering 2,800,000 Cleaning of Beirut’s CDR Planning and Programming Department Group administrative streets (of the CDR) and Oger International 31-12-1995 Sukkar Consensus between the Sectoral 6-3-1995 until 1348, annex 2 Engineering 7,500,000 Cleaning of the streets of CDR Planning and Programming Department Group Greater Beirut (of the CDR) and Oger International 31-12-1995 Sukkar Consensus between the Sectoral 6-1-1995 until 1348, annex 3 Engineering - Donation of 10 trucks CDR Planning and Programming Department Group and 1,600 containers (of the CDR) and Oger International 21-2-1995 Collection of domestic Independent Consensus between the Sectoral Sukkar waste and cleaning of 1-1-1996 until 1348, annex 4 Engineering 102,625,000 Municipal Planning and Programming Department 31-12-2000 the streets of Greater Fund (of the CDR) and Oger International Group Beirut Source: Minutes of Cabinet Meetings 6 - 4 - 2010 issue 103 - February 2011 6 | LEADER SUKLEEN and nine location monitors) in addition to office rent, The contracts [...] were telecommunication and transportation.
Recommended publications
  • ROUANE ITANI [email protected] (202) 210-4774 Washington, DC
    ROUANE ITANI [email protected] (202) 210-4774 Washington, DC Native Levantine Arabic and French Linguist, Instructor, Communications Expert and Interpreter. PROFILE • Fluent Arabic, French and English • Translation and Interpreting • Cross-cultural communication • Film Subtitling• Teaching and education • EXPERIENCE Arabic, English Interpreting and Translation: § Interpreted in more than 40 legal, medical and community settings for language agencies in the Washington metropolitan area. § Translated and edited hundreds or documents, including: training and marketing materials, instructional school guides and manuals, fliers and brochures, vital records, legal correspondence and government regulations. Experience with international development, arts and culture, human rights and asylum cases. Language and Cross-Cultural Communications: § Provided linguistic and cross-cultural competency consulting and subtitling services in Arabic and English for more than 20 media projects and documentary films. § Wrote, translated and narrated scripts for more than 30 projects reaching wide Arabic-speaking audiences around the world. On Air-Hosting and Television Producing in Arabic language: § On-Air hosted live in Arabic more than 200 daily health education television segments. § Conducted interviews in Arabic, on and off camera, with dozens of medical experts and health care providers. Teaching: § Teach Arabic and French languages at Berlitz, Washington, DC. § Teach Arabic at International Language Institute, Washington, DC. § Taught undergraduate Course 440 “International Media: A Focus on the Middle East.” The Washington Center for Internships and Academic Seminars. (See pages 3 for samples of Projects and Clients) 1 ROUANE ITANI [email protected] Washington, DC LANGUAGES Arabic (Native Levantine and Modern Standard Arabic). Speak Lebanese Arabic daily. French (Near native). English (Fluent read, write, speak at advanced academic and professional levels).
    [Show full text]
  • The Board of Trustees of the Center for Excellence in Education
    The Board of Trustees of the Center for Excellence in Education Honorary Members The Honorable Jimmy Carter The Honorable Tom Davis The Honorable William H. Frist The Honorable Joseph I. Lieberman The Honorable Ellen O. Tauscher Board of Trustees Mr. Mel Chaskin, Chairman Ms. Joann P. DiGennaro, President Mr. Bill Andresen Mr. Michael H. Jordan The Honorable Caroline E. Baker Mr. Raymond C. Kubacki Mr. John D. Bergen Dr. David Lee The Honorable Frank C. Carlucci Admiral W.A. Owens, USN (Ret.) Mr. Red Cavaney Mr. James C. Paul The Honorable Anne Collins The Honorable Thomas R. Pickering Dr. Mary DeLong Mr. David K. Rensin Mrs. Betty Dranow Ms. Cynthia Pickett-Stevenson Mr. Nicholas S. Gouletas Ms. Diane Sawyer H.E. Bahia El Hariri Mr. Fred Weinert Mr. Douglas Heimburger Mrs. Gayle Wilson Center for Excellence in Education 8201 Greensboro Drive,Suite 215 McLean,VA 22102 A Nonprofit Organization Under U.S. Code 501 (c) (3) Research Science Institute 2004 Faculty and Staff RSI Directors Mr. Matthew Paschke (MIT) RSI ’91 North Canton,OH Dr. Carey Inouye (Caltech) Honolulu,HI Vice President of Administration Ms. Maite P. Ballestero Bethesda,MD Assistant Directors Mr. James Skelley (MIT) RSI ’99 Joplin,MO Ms. Dagny Looper (Caltech) RSI ’99 Bryant,AR Professors — MIT Dr. Amy Bany RSI ’90E Yale University Mr. Adrian Campbell RSI ’92 Bayer Corporation Dr. Leonardo Hsu RSI ’87 University of Minnesota Mr. Lance Rhoades University of Washington Dr. Christopher Skinner RSI ’88 University of Michigan Professors — Caltech Dr. Charles Doran RSI ’87 Columbia University Dr. Parth Patwari RSI ’90E Brigham & Women’s Hospital Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Education Grant: List of Schools with Most Claims, Per Level and Proposed Representative Schools
    ICSC/70/CRP.10 4 February 2010 ENGLISH ONLY Seventieth session Santiago, 22 February-5 March 2010 Item 5(b) of the provisional agenda* Conditions of service applicable to both categories of staff Education grant: list of schools with most claims, per level and proposed representative schools Proposed Number of claims Zone/School name representative Primary/ Post Total schools secondary secondary AUSTRIA (4 primary/secondary representative schools) 687 59 746 Vienna International School X 437 - 437 Lycée Français de Vienne X 106 - 106 American International School X 34 - 34 Vienna Christian School X 28 - 28 Danube International School - 16 - 16 Japanese School in Vienna - 8 - 8 De la Salle Schule - 8 - 8 Bundesgymnasium und Bundesrealgynmasium - 5 - 5 Theresianische Akademie - 5 - 5 Salvator Schule - 3 - 3 Siener Saengeknaben Volkschule - 3 - 3 Arabisch Schule - 2 - 2 Neulandschulen - 2 - 2 University of Vienna - - 12 12 * ICSC/70/R.1. ICSC/70/CRP.10 Proposed Number of claims Zone/School name representative Primary/ Post Total schools secondary secondary AUSTRIA (cont’d) Webster University - - 10 10 Technical University Vienna - - 6 6 International University - - 5 5 Wirtschaft Universitat - - 4 4 Sae Technology Institute - - 3 3 Vienna University of Technology - - 2 2 47 more schools with one claim each 30 17 47 BELGIUM (1 primary/secondary and 1 post secondary representative schools) 44 27 71 Athenee Royal* - 6 - 6 Lycée Français Jean Monnet* - 6 - 6 European School* - 5 - 5 British International School* - 4 - 4 International School of Brussels* X 3 - 3 Ecole Communale N°7 du Bois de la Cambre - 2 - 2 Kta Rijdtmeersen - 2 - 2 Catholic University of Louvain** - - 6 6 Universite Libre de Bruxelles** X - 5 5 Artevelde Hogeschool - - 2 2 Institut Superieur de Traducteurs et Interpretes - - 2 2 28 more schools with one claim each 16 12 28 * While these schools have comparable numbers of claims, International School of Brussels is the largest English speaking school in Brussels catering to expatriates.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 2011 1 IC Newsletter Summer 2011 2 SUMMER 2011 International College
    SUMMER 2011 1 IC Newsletter Summer 2011 2 SUMMER 2011 INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE Board of Trustees William H. Turner, Chairman Fouad M. Malouf ’56, Vice Chairman T.M. (Mac) Deford, Treasurer Donald J. Selinger, Assistant Treasurer Note Richard S. Ward, Secretary Anwar Al Mulla ‘63 from the Editor Mohamad S. H. Al-Soleiman ‘59 Mona Bawarshi ‘67 Wael O. Bayazid ‘70 Jonathan (Jon) A. Conner I was visiting a donor, who also hap- Camille Cotran ‘74 pens to be a close friend and IC parent Frederik O. Crawford Walid Daouk ‘76 when we started discussing the reason we Bayard Dodge launched IC’s Partnership for Excellence Ford Fraker Campaign. The reason is very simple: we Peter H. Gerard will not be generating any extra income Amal A. Ghandour Dr. Marwan M. Ghandour ‘63 from our new buildings once completed. Anthony Jones In other words, the student body will not Yusuf A. Kan’an ‘71 increase. We will remain as we are. The Gerrit Keator same number of students will continue enjoying a high quality education only this Peter Kellner time, with state of the art facilities. Burdening current parents with the cost of the Marwan A. Marshi ‘79 Safwan Masri new elementary school was also out of the question. There was only one thing to John G. McCarthy, Jr. do: launch a fundraising campaign. Azmi Mikati My friend was naturally interested. After an elaborate discussion, he generously Mirna B. Noujaim pledged $1m to the campaign. He was obviously intrigued and touched by our ef- Aida Reed (Luce) Ian Reed forts and wanted to help out.
    [Show full text]
  • RECEIVED: FINAL DRAFT 20.09.2004 (Monday)
    MENA CHILD PROTECTION INITIATIVE Report on: Situation analysis of Vulnerable and Disadvantaged urban children: The Case of Beirut September 11, 2004 Submitted By: Mary E. Deeb, Ph.D Bernard Gerbaka, M.D. In collaboration with Lina Hammaoui, M.P.H. RECEIVED: FINAL DRAFT 20.09.2004 (Monday) 1 / 87 Table of Contents Acknowledgements List of tables List of figures Introductory note I. Review of the Status of Urban Children A. Background 1. Demographic characteristics 2. Economic characteristics B. The Convention on the rights of the child 1. Definition of the Child, the Lebanese Context C. Child Health 1. Infant and Child Mortality 2. Maternal mortality 3. Indicators and prevalence of child morbidity 4. Indicators and prevalence of accidents and injuries 5. Nutrition 5.1 Prevalence of malnutrition 5.2 Breastfeeding and infant feeding patterns 5.3 Iodine deficiency D. Formal Education 1. Prevalence of illiteracy 2. Early Childhood Education 3. Primary education 4. School drop-out prevalence E. Social Status of children 1. Child Culture 2. Leisure time F. Vulnerable and Disadvantaged Children 1. Child Labor 1.1 Prevalence and characteristics of child labor in Lebanon 1.2 Domestic work 1.3 Paid or unpaid work within the family 1.4 Paid work as part of the labor force a. age b. regional distribution c. nationality 2 / 87 d. age of entry into labor force e. education f. nature of work g. occupation type h. economic sector i. relationship with employer j. income and other benefits 2. Children in conflict with the law 2.1 Prevalence and characteristics 2.2 Sexual abuse 2.3 Drug-related arrests 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Observation Zokak El Blat Beirut - Lebanon
    URBAN OBSERVATION ZOKAK EL BLAT BEIRUT - LEBANON Academic Urban Observatory Institute of Urban Planning October 2012 Written by Rita E. Chedid Collaborators Marieke Krijnen Bruno Marot Hala Moussawi Jean-Marc Adjizian Cartography Vicken Ashkarian Directed by Serge Yazigi Acknowledgement Jennifer Casagrande PHD Student Architecture Students (ALBA) for their contribution to Architectural and Economic Activities Surveys Jamayla Cahaccour Claudia Sadaka Eliane Daccache Lena Osseiran Racha Hajj Chahine Christelle Khalil Mohammad Ajam Wael Hajj TABLE OF CONTENT INTRODUCTION 5 1. THE CHOICE OF THE STUDY AREA 6 2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 7 CHAPTER I: CASE STUDY 8 1. ZOKAK EL BLAT URBAN DEVELOPMENT 9 2. THE HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF ZOKAK EL BLAT 10 3. INSTITUTIONAL AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK 16 3.1. Land Use And Exploitation 16 3.2. Laws Pertaining To Built Heritage 17 3.2.1. The Ottoman Period 17 3.2.2. The French Mandate: The Antiquities Regulation 17 3.2.3. The Urban Planning Law 17 3.2.4. The Building Law 17 3.3. Studies On The Protection Of Historical Buildings In Beirut Pericentral Areas 18 3.3.1. “Association De Protection Et De Sauvegarde Des Anciennes Demeures” (Apsad) Study 18 3.3.2. The Directorate General Of Urban Planning (Dgup) Study 19 3.3.3. The Khatib & Alami Study 20 4. DRAFT LAW FOR THE PROTECTION AND SAFEGUARD OF OLD BUILDINGS AND PATRIMONIAL SITES 21 CHAPTER 2: DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY 22 1. STUDY OBJECTIVES 22 2. STUDY FRAMEWORK 22 3. DATA COLLECTION SOURCES AND FORMS 25 4. DATA SUCCESSFULLY OBTAINED 25 5. DATA PARTIALLY OBTAINED, ALTERNATIVE STRATEGIES 25 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonstate Schooling in the Middle East & North Africa
    Photo credit: USAID Jordan Flickr NONSTATE SCHOOLING IN THE MIDDLE EAST & NORTH AFRICA MARCH 2021 This publication was produced at the request of the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared independently by Andrew I. Epstein, Samaya Mansour, Lee Rensimer, Catherine Villada, and Carly Farver Mphasa with support from Nicholas Burnett, Amy Porter, and Catherine Caligan for Social Impact, Inc. The authors’ views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS I. Executive Summary 1 Evaluation Purpose and Methods 1 Categories of Nonstate Schools 2 Nonstate School Enrollment Trends 3 Nonstate School Education Outcomes 5 Summary of Findings by Country 6 Conclusions 7 Summary Recommendations 9 II. Introduction & Background 12 III. Objectives & Questions 12 IV. Study Methodology 14 Report Structure & Answering the Study Questions 14 Study Limitations 15 V. Conceptualizing & analyzing Nonstate Schooling 17 State and Nonstate Schooling 17 Types of Nonstate Schooling 17 Analytic Frame 18 VI. Summary Findings 21 Nonstate Schooling and the MENA Context 21 Nonstate Schooling Prevalence in the MENA Region 27 Governance & Monitoring of Nonstate Schools 32 Nonstate School Curriculum and Pedagogy 32 Nonstate School Outcomes 33 VII. Summary Conclusions & recommendations 36 Prevalence/Distribution of Nonstate Schools 36 Categories of Nonstate Schools 37 Populations Served by Nonstate Schools 38 Outcomes of Nonstate Schools 38 State of the Literature 39 Summary
    [Show full text]