DOCSLIB.ORG

1995 California Environmental Scorecard

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1995 California Environmental Scorecard 1995 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL SCORECARD 22ND ANNUAL GUIDE TO ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION AND VOTES CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS THE CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CO N S E R VATION VOTERS CO N T E N T S he California League of Conservation Voters is the non-partisan political action arm of Ca l i f o rn i a ’ s environmental movement. The League works to protect the envi r o n - 1995: Year in Revi e w .. 1 Tmental quality of the state by working to elect envi r o n m e n t a l l y responsible candidates The Worst of ‘95 .. 1 to state and federal office, then hold them accountable to the environmental agenda. Voting Summary .. 2 The League conducts rigorous research on candidates and concentrates on the races whe r e Notes on the Scores.. 2 our resources can make a difference. We back our endorsements with exp e r tise, assisting The Agenda: Bill Descriptions .. 3 - 5 candidates with the media, fundraising and grassroots organizing strategies they need to win. As s e m b ly Floor Chart .. 6 - 9 Each election yea r , we place experienced organizers, known as the Grizzly Corps, in the most Senate Floor Chart.. 10 - 11 cr ucial environmental contests in the state, then work to get out the vote on Election Day. In Five- Y ear Aver a g e s .. .1 2 1994, CLCV fielded 20 Grizzlies in 17 campaigns and contributed over $220,000 on behalf Leg i s l a t i ve of candidates. Ro s t e r s. Inside Back Cover The League is also a legi s l a t i ve wat c h d o g. Each yea r , we track scores of envi r o n m e n t a l bills and votes in Sacramento and work to make sure legislators hear from environmental © 1995 California League of voters. At session’s end, we publish the Ca l i f ornia Envi r onmental Scorec a r d to help voters dis- Co n s e r vation Vot e r s tinguish between the rhetoric and reality of a lawm a ke r ’ s record. 965 Mission St., Suite 625 This edition of the Scorecard records the most important environmental votes of the 1995 session. Now in its 22nd yea r , the Scorecard – distributed to 25,000 League members, other San Francisco, CA 94103 en vironmental organizations and the news media – is the authoritative guide to the state’s envi - (415) 896-5550 ronmental politics. 10951 W. Pico Blvd. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Los Angeles, CA 90064 (310) 441-4162 Paul Growal d , Chairpe r s o n Dian Grueneich, President Mi k e Eaton, N. Cal Vice President In t e r net: [email protected] or Ruth Hunter, S. Cal. Vice President ht t p : / / w w w. e c o vot e . o rg / e c o vot e Fred Woo c h e r , Tre a s u r e r Jane Win g fi e l d , Secretary Winston Hickox, Past President Charles Grace, Chairperson Emeritus Tom Ad a m s Melinda Bittan Ann Boren Kimo Campbell Nicholas Clinch Jim Compton Per mission granted to quote from or Fran Diamond Ca r o l yn Green Cl i f f Gladstein reproduce portions of this publi c a t i o n Jennifer Herna n d e z if properly credited. Paul Helliker Doug Linney Ann Notthoff Ga r y Pat t o n Tom Soto Printed on recycled paper using Ter res Unsoeld La r ry Wan so y-based inks Lynn Was s e r Monica Wes o l ow s k i Designed by Mark Deitch & V. John Wh i t e B.J . Wil h o i t Associates, Inc., Los An g e l e s AC K N O W L E D G E M E N T S The League thanks the following organizations and individuals for their contributions to the 1995 California Envi r onmental Scorec a rd : American Lung As s o c i a t i o n V. John White and As s o c i a t e s Ca l i f o r nia Native Plant Society Audubon Society Ca l P I R G Ca l i f o r nians Ag ainst Was t e Joe Caves Mountain Lion Preservation Fou n d a t i o n Planning and Conservation League Price Consulting Si e r ra Club Californi a Trust for Public Land 1995: A ‘WILD RIDE’ IN YEAR OF TURMOIL, BUT GREENS HOLD THE LINE “We ’ ve been down a wild river, but we didn’t drown .” be l o w) both stalled after citizens targeted the Capitol with — Si e r ra Club lobbyi s t / calls and letters. CLCV Board member V. John Wh i t e , Some good bills made it through unscathed. Jim Costa’s San Diego Union-Tri bu n e , Sept. 22 SB 901 is a landmark in water policy: For the first time, local officials must make sure water supplies are avai l a bl e o call 1995 a year of turmoil in the Legislature is before approving new devel o p m e n t . li k e calling a hurricane a stiff breeze. The ongoing But the bills that reached Gov. Wilson found the deck Tbattle over control of the As s e m b ly produced a yea r st a c k ed. Of six pro-environment bills sent to him, he vet o e d with three Speakers, three politically- m o t i vated recall elec- half. Of eight anti-environmental bills, he signed them all. tions, debates dominated by name-calling, and low produc- The oddest thing about 1995 may be that envi r o n m e n - tal scores are up: For both houses and both parties, the tiv i t y . The uncertainty means just about ever ything about aver ge floor score rose by 3 to 12 points over 1994. Per f e c t 1995 should be marked with a footnote: Wait ‘til next yea r . scores rose from 6 to 19, and zeros dropped from 6 to 1. Fueled by contributions from Big Oil and other pollut- Se veral factors contribut e d , including the strong bipar- ing industries, anti-environmentalists mounted swee p i n g tisan support for several conservation bills, and the fact that attacks on Californi a ’ s public health and natural resources ma n y of the worst bills had no floor votes because of the – with Gov. Wilson launching his own anti-envi r o n m e n t a l di s o r ganization. Also welcome were an emerging group of broadsides in a bid to boost his presidential campaign. Th e m o d e r a t e ly green-leaning Republicans, unfort u n a t e ly same special interests working in the guise of “regu l a t o r y accompanied by the sharp anti-environmental turn of sev- re f o r m” to roll back federal environmental laws brought eral Democrats. their agenda to California and produced a flood of bad In both parties, the polarization now is between true bi l l s . be l i e vers in the myth of “jobs vs. the environment” and The good news: For the most part, envi r o n m e n t a l i s t s those who realize protecting the environment is about pro- held the line. The chaos helped, as environmentalists wer e tecting the public health of 33 million Californians. Unless ab le to block many of the worst bills in sympathetic com- more lawm a k ers listen to the people instead of special mittees. But the environmental community also flexed its interests, 1996 promises more of the same. grassroots muscle. The two worst bills of the year (see THE WORST OF ‘95 – SB 1180, SB 1307 he two worst bills of the session never made it to a Grassroots pressure forced a delay of the vote, and as final vote – and one was never voted on at all. Both the anti-1180 campaign gained momentum, Calderon with- Twere by Sen. Charles Calderon: SB 1180 wou l d dr e w the provisions gutting CEQA. Another assault on ha ve gutted the California Environmental Quality Ac t CEQA is expected in 1996. (CEQA), and SB 1307 attacked the state’s Safe Drinking SB 1307 was backed by the major oil companies, who Water Ac t . spent $1.8 million pushing it. It would lower state drinking SB 1180, written by the Wilson Administration, was the water standards for the pesticide DBCP and other contam- most serious attack ever mounted against CEQA – an envi - inants, jeopardizing the health of the most vulnerable pop- ronmental Bill of Rights that guarantees citizens a voice in ulations. It would prohibit the state from setting stricter decisions about envi r o n m e n t a l l y harmful development pro- standards than the federal gover nment – a shorts i g h t e d jects. Under current law, developers must prove that their projects will not harm the environment. SB 1180 wou l d mo ve when Congress is considering lowering federal stan- ha ve reversed the burden of proof, so that citizens who da r d s .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Government
    330673_fm.qxd 02/02/05 1:04 PM Page i California Government CengageNot for Learning Reprint 330673_fm.qxd 02/02/05 1:04 PM Page ii CengageNot for Learning Reprint 330673_fm.qxd 02/02/05 1:04 PM Page iii ######## California Government Fourth Edition John L. Korey California State Polytechnic University, Pomona CengageNot for Learning Reprint Houghton Mifflin Company Boston New York 330673_fm.qxd 02/02/05 1:04 PM Page iv DEDICATION To Mary, always and to the newest family members— Welcome to California Publisher: Charles Hartford Sponsoring Editor: Katherine Meisenheimer Assistant Editor: Christina Lembo Editorial Assistant: Kristen Craib Associate Project Editor: Teresa Huang Editorial Assistant: Jake Perry Senior Art and Design Coordinator: Jill Haber Senior Photo Editor: Jennifer Meyer Dare Senior Composition Buyer: Sarah Ambrose Manufacturing Coordinator: Carrie Wagner Executive Marketing Manager: Nicola Poser Marketing Associate: Kathleen Mellon Cover image: Primary California Photography, © Harold Burch, New York City. California State Bear Photo © Bob Rowan, Progressive Image/CORBIS. Copyright © 2006 by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system without the prior written permission of Houghton Mifflin Company unless such copying is expressly permitted by federal copyright law. Address inquiries to College Permissions, Houghton Mifflin
    [Show full text]
  • 1994 California Environmental Scorecard
    THE SIMPLEST THING YOU CAN DO TO SAVE THE PLANET. 1994 Environmental Voting Chart 21st Annual Guide to the California State Legislature CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS THE CALIFORNIA LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS CONTENTS The California League of Conservation Voters is the non-partisan political action arm of California’s environmental Anti-Environmental Assault Continues 1 movement. The League works to protect the environmental How a Bill Becomes Law. .2 quality of the state by electing environmentally responsible candidates and holding them accountable. The League conducts Box Scores. .2 rigorous research on candidates and concentrates on the races 1994 Voting Summary. .2 where our resources can make a difference. 5-Year Averages. .2 Bill Descriptions. .3 We back our endorsements with expertise, assisting A Guide to the Voting Chart. .7 candidates with the media, fundraising and grassroots Assembly Floor Votes. .8 organizing strategies they need to win. Each election year, we Assembly Committee Votes. .12 place experienced organizers, known as the Grizzly Corps, in the Senate Committee Votes. .15 most crucial environmental contests in the state, then work to get out the vote on Election Day. In 1994, CLCV fielded 20 Grizzlies Senate Floor Votes. .16 in 17 campaigns and spent over $220,000 on behalf of candidates. Assembly Roster. .19 Senate Roster. .20 Each year we publish our Legislative Voting Chart to help County Voter Registrars. .20 voters distinguish between the rhetoric and reality of a lawmaker’s record. This edition of the Chart records the most California Conservation Voter important environmental votes of the 1994 session. Now in its Follows Page 20 21st year, the Chart-distributed to League members, other environmental organizations and the news media-is the authoritative source on the state’s environmental politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting to Term Limits in California: Recent Experiences and New Directions
    Adapting to Term Limits in California: Recent Experiences and New Directions By Bruce E. Cain, University of California, Berkeley Thad Kousser, University of California, San Diego Joint Project on Term Limits 2004 National Conference of State Legislatures Council of State Governments State Legislative Leaders’ Foundation 7700 East First Place Denver, CO 80230-7143 (303) 364-7700 • fax (303) 364-7800 444 North Capitol Street, N.W., Suite 515 Washington, D.C. 20001 (202) 624-5400 • fax (202) 737-1069 http://www.ncsl.org © 2005 by the National Conference of State Legislatures. All rights reserved. Summary Passed in 1990, Proposition 140 changed Sacramento by setting term limits for legislators, but exactly how has it affected the Legislature, and what can the institution do to respond? This study moves beyond the stale debate over whether term limits made California politics better or worse and instead develops concrete measures of their effects and identifies ways to adapt to changes. Guided by the testimony and advice of informed observers, it offers quantitative analyses using bill histories, voting behavior, the content of bills, budget figures, and other archival records to explore how term limits have shaped the way the Legislature deals with major issues. We find that term limits altered – but did not revolutionize – the type of legislator who comes to Sacramento. In particular, Proposition 140 helped to accelerate trends of increasing female and minority representation that were already underway in California. Instead of being a new breed of “citizen legislator,” however, new members after term limits are more likely to have local government experience and to run for another office—for Assemblymembers, often a State Senate seat—when their terms expire.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimum. Wage- G.Athers Steam Page 3
    c-FL) See Minimum. Wage- G.athers Steam Page 3 Back Off,Pt!NBIn r Trades Take on the Governor Check By JACK HENNING Executive Secretary-Treasurer California Labo6r Federation, AFL-CIO AFL-CIO President John Sweeney last week issued a call to arms to the faithful. On March 25 in Washington, D.C., labor will draft a grass roots legislative and political program, approve a special per capita increase for a 12-month period, and endorse for the U.S. presidency. It is the endorsement that will stir the blood and assure full attendance. Bill Clinton should win in a walk, but no blank check, please. hndeed, this very month AFL-CIO headquarters noted that the U.S. trade balance with Mexico continues in a downward plunge. The North American Free Trade Agreement has meant predicted decline for U.S. workers. Bill Clinton wouldn't listen.. Labor had warned that U.S. capital would ravage Mexican workers for.the profit -of corporate barons. It was.painfully clear that our companies below the border would produce cheap and sell high on the Amer- ican market The American consumer would. pay the same high price for the low wage auto as for one -manufactured in Detroit. A-corporate goldmine. Unfortunately, in the -fierce NAFIA debates of 1993 the president employed raw political patronage to mus- clehisway Over 15,000 building trades workers besieged the state capitol Feb., 14. Twice this month, California's this requirement to base the average building trades workers rose to..chal- on union and non-union scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Members of the Assembly 1849-2019
    Record of Members of the Assembly 1849–2019 Name Politics Counties Representing Sessions Served Aanestad, Sam R Butte, Lassen, Modoc, Nevada, Plumas, Sierra, 1999–2002 Yuba Abbott, Carlisle S R Monterey 21st (1875–6), 22nd (1877–8) Ables, Thomas J Union Marin 17th (1867–8), 20th (1873–74) Achadjian, Katcho R San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara 2011–2016 1 Ackerman, Dick R Orange 1995–2000 Acosta, Dante R Los Angeles, Ventura 2017–2018 Adams, Amos Douglas D Sacramento 12th (1861) Union Sacramento 14th (1863) Adams, Anthony R Los Angeles, San Bernardino 2007–2010 Adams, E. G. D Madera, Merced 46th (1925) D, R Madera, Merced 47th (1927), 48th (1929) Adams, James R Sonoma 23rd (1880) Adams, L. B. D Yolo 27th (1887), 28th (1889) Adams, P. R. D Santa Cruz 30th (1893) Adams, W.S. D Kern, Tulare 22nd (1877–8) Adkison, D.O. Whig Yuba 6th (1855) Union Yuba 14th (1863) Aghazarian, Greg R San Joaquin, Stanislaus 2003–2008 2 Agnos, Art D San Francisco 1977–1988 Aguiar, Fred R Los Angeles, San Bernardino 1993–1998 Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. D Colusa, Lake, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Yolo 2017–2019 3 Alarcón, Richard D Los Angeles 2007 4 Alatorre, Richard J. D Los Angeles 1973–1985 5 Alby, Barbara R Sacramento 1993–1998 Aldrich, W. A R San Francisco 19th (1871–72) Ind San Francisco 20th (1873–74) Aldridge, Frank D, Peo. P. Santa Cruz 32nd (1897) Alejo, Luis D Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz 2011–2016 Alexander, Charles O. R Alameda 27th (1887), 28th (1889) Alexander, J.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Unionism at Convention
    Gov. ut toKilEgtHuUlay, Gov. Pete Wilsonfs newest attack Wilson, back in, Sacramento after tees-to abolish the requirement for worker protection thought by the day. He said employers would gain upon the eight-hour work day is be- another cross-country campaign~ overtime pay after eight hours in a Governor. It is a shameless appeal. "flexibilit' if they didn't have to ing blasted as a cynical attempt to trip, made the proposal last Friday day that, was won by California to the radical right,' his party. What pay workers time'and a half after boost his presidential prospects during a speech before the Califor- workers 84 years ago. next?" eight hours. There was talk about with the rabidly anti-worker right nia Chamber of Commerce. He said Jack Henning, ex-ecutive secre- Wilson trotted out the spurious ".changing lifestyles." wing of the Republican Paty and to he would ask the state Industrial tary-treasurer of the California La- right-wing argument that workers Outraged Democratic legislators elicit more campaign contributions Welfare Commission- consisting bor Federation said Wilsonfs action themselves want to be freed from and labor spokespersons imme- from employer organizations. of a 3 to 2 majority of his appoin- "Arepresents an incredible reversal of the restrictions of the eight-hour (ConfinuedI on Page 4) La.,,lbor s Foes Fail. To.Grab Vol 38-No. 18 O Septembr1,19 Gavel Hard-line, anti-labor Republicans failed to seize the Assembly speaker's gavel for the third time yesterday. Doris Allen, the Orange County Republican who GOP ultra conser- vatives are trying to recall, resigned the speakership and was succeeded This was Labor Day 1995 in by Brian Setencich, a Republican California: freshman from Fresno who actually At Pleasanton, the biggest picnic has' presided over the lower house of crowd ever assembled- in this state the Legislature during much of Al- for the holiday roraring approval as len's 102 days in office as her President Bill Clinton blasted Re- speaker pro tem.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Members of the Assembly 1849–2021
    Record of Members of the Assembly 1849–2021 Name Politics Counties Representing Regular Sessions Served Aanestad, Sam R Butte, Lassen, Modoc, Nevada, Plumas, Sierra, 1999–2002 Yuba Abbott, Carlisle S. R Monterey 21st (1875–6), 22nd (1877–8) Ables, Thomas J. Union Marin 17th (1867–8), 20th (1873–74) Achadjian, Katcho R San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara 2011–2016 1 Ackerman, Dick R Orange 1995–2000 Acosta, Dante R Los Angeles, Ventura 2017–2018 Adams, Amos Douglas D Sacramento 12th (1861) Union Sacramento 14th (1863) Adams, Anthony R Los Angeles, San Bernardino 2007–2010 Adams, E. G. D Madera, Merced 46th (1925) D, R Madera, Merced 47th (1927), 48th (1929) Adams, James R Sonoma 23rd (1880) Adams, L. B. D Yolo 27th (1887), 28th (1889) Adams, P. R. D Santa Cruz 30th (1893) Adams, W.S. D Kern, Tulare 22nd (1877–8) Adkison, D.O. Whig Yuba 6th (1855) Union Yuba 14th (1863) Aghazarian, Greg R San Joaquin, Stanislaus 2003–2008 2 Agnos, Art D San Francisco 1977–1988 Aguiar, Fred R Los Angeles, San Bernardino 1993–1998 Aguiar-Curry, Cecilia M. D Colusa, Lake, Napa, Solano, Sonoma, Yolo 2017–2021 3 Alarcón, Richard D Los Angeles 2007 4 Alatorre, Richard J. D Los Angeles 1973–1985 5 Alby, Barbara R Sacramento 1993–1998 Record of Members of the Assembly 1849–2021 Name Politics Counties Representing Regular Sessions Served Aldrich, W. A. R San Francisco 19th (1871–72) Ind San Francisco 20th (1873–74) Aldridge, Frank D, Peo. P. Santa Cruz 32nd (1897) Alejo, Luis D Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz 2011–2016 Alexander, Charles O.
    [Show full text]
  • FACCCTS: the Journal of the Faculty Association of California Community Colleges, 1995-1996
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 444 611 JC 000 533 AUTHOR Martinez, Katherine, Ed. TITLE FACCCTS: The Journal of the Faculty Association of California Community Colleges, 1995-1996. INSTITUTION California Community Colleges, Sacramento. Faculty Association. PUB DATE 1996-00-00 NOTE 138p.; Published four times a year. PUB TYPE Collected Works Serials (022) JOURNAL CIT FACCCTS: The Journal of California Community College Faculty; v2 n1-4 Sep 1995-May 1996 EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *College Faculty; *Community Colleges; *Educational Legislation; Educational Planning; Futures (of Society); Student Characteristics; *Teacher Attitudes; *Tenure; Two Year Colleges IDENTIFIERS *California Community Colleges ABSTRACT This document contains the four issues of FACCCTS, the Journal of the Faculty Association of the California Community Colleges, published during the 1995-96 academic year. In the September 1995 issue, faculty members explore sensitive faculty issues: Is tenure's time up? When will part-time faculty finally receive the respect they deserve? Should the 175-day academic calendar be killed? In the November/December 1995 issue, faculty members, fundamentalists, state government, and Assembly member John Vasconcellos voice their vision for the community colleges' future. The February 1996 issue explores "Tidal Wave II," a term coined by the authors of a report from the California Higher Education Policy center for referring to the new students who will flood higher education in the next decade. FACCTS looks at who they are, their attitudes, the job market they are entering, and their vision of the future, in their own words. The May 1996 issue includes stories of some of the keynote speakers and recipients of the 1996 FACCC Awards at the 1996 FACCC Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • Adapting to Term Limits: Recent Experiences and New Directions
    Adapting to Term Limits: Recent Experiences and New Directions ••• Bruce E. Cain Thad Kousser 2004 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Cain, Bruce E. Adapting to term limits : recent experiences and new directions / Bruce E. Cain p. cm. ISBN: 1-58213-101-5 1. California. Legislature—Term of office. 2. Legislation— California. 3. Legislative oversight—California. 4. California— Politics and government—1951- I. Kousser, Thad, 1974- II. Public Policy Institute of California. III. Title. JK8766.C35 2004 328.794’073—dc22 2004020149 Copyright © 2004 by Public Policy Institute of California All rights reserved San Francisco, CA Short sections of text, not to exceed three paragraphs, may be quoted without written permission provided that full attribution is given to the source and the above copyright notice is included. PPIC does not take or support positions on any ballot measure or on any local, state, or federal legislation, nor does it endorse, support, or oppose any political parties or candidates for public office. Research publications reflect the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the staff, officers, or Board of Directors of the Public Policy Institute of California. Foreword When political observers turn their attention to California’s systemic problems, they often place term limits near the top of the list—along with the initiative process, gerrymandering, and the two-thirds requirement to pass a budget in the Legislature. Passed in 1990, Proposition 140 restricts state legislators to six years in the Assembly and eight in the Senate. Many critics argue that this restriction has harmed the legislative process.
    [Show full text]
  • California's Legislature
    Table of Contents Appendices Table of Contents Table of Contents 277 APPENDIX A SESSIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 1849–2016 The first two sessions were held in San Jose; the Third Session met at Vallejo and later removed to Sacramento; the Fourth Session met at Vallejo and later removed to Benicia; the Fifth Session met at Benicia and later removed to Sacramento. Beginning with the Sixth Session all Legislatures have met in Sacramento, except the Thirteenth which convened at Sacramento but later removed to San Francisco; the 1958 session and the 1999–2000 session met at Benicia for one day. In 1949, Joint Rule 39 was adopted to clarify that “hereafter all regular sessions of the Legislature shall be designated by the year in which held, and all extraordinary sessions shall be designated in numerical order by the year in which convened.” Legislative days † Session Convened Adjourned Assembly Senate Length * 1 ..................................... Dec. 15, 1849 April 22, 1850 103 103 129 2 ..................................... Jan. 6, 1851 May 1, 1851 98 98 116 3 ..................................... Jan. 5, 1852 May 4, 1852 96 96 120 4 ..................................... Jan. 3, 1853 May 19, 1853 108 109 137 5 ..................................... Jan. 2, 1854 May 15, 1854 110 108 134 6 ..................................... Jan. 1, 1855 May 7, 1855 103 102 127 7 ..................................... Jan. 7, 1856 April 21, 1856 87 85 106 8 ..................................... Jan. 5, 1857 April 30, 1857 99 100 116 9 ..................................... Jan. 4, 1858 April 26, 1858 93 96 113 10 ..................................... Jan. 3, 1859 April 19, 1859 89 88 107 11 ..................................... Jan. 2, 1860 April 30, 1860 100 96 120 12 ....................................
    [Show full text]
  • California's Legislature
    Table of Contents CALIFORNIA’S LEGISLATURE 105 Table of Contents 106 CALIFORNIA’S LEGISLATURE Members-elect are sworn in as Senators during the organizational meeting of the 1997–98 Regular Session, convened on December 2, 1996. Table of Contents 107 Chapter VIII Organization of the Legislature The New Member During an election campaign, the attentions of the candidate are primarily focused on garnering enough votes to win the election. When the excitement of election night has passed, the Member-elect begins a new journey, one which culminates in membership in the California Legislature. After the election, the Secretary of State compares and estimates the votes cast and then delivers to the successful candidates a certificate of election which serves as prima facie evidence of the candidates’ right to membership in the Legislature. 1 As a first step to realization of this right, the new legislator appears in the Assembly Chamber, if he or she is an Assembly Member-elect, or in the Senate Chamber, if he or she is a Senator-elect, at 12 o’clock noon on the opening day of the session. 2 At that time the Chief Clerk of the last regular session calls the Assembly to order, 3 while the Lieutenant Governor performs the similar duty in the Senate. 4 A prayer is offered in each house by the respective Chaplain of the last regular session, after which the Reading Clerk (in the Assembly) and the Assistant Secretary (in the Senate) reads the certificate of duly elected Members as certified by the office of the Secretary of State.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Members of the Assembly 1849-2016
    Record of Members of the Assembly 1849–2016 Name Politics Counties Representing Sessions Served Aanestad, Sam R Butte, Lassen, Modoc, Nevada, Plumas, Sierra, 1999–2002 Yuba Abbott, Carlisle S R Monterey 21st (1875), 22nd (1877) Ables, Thomas J Union Marin 17th (1867), 20th (1873) Achadjian, Katcho R San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara 2011–2016 1 Ackerman, Dick R Orange 1995–2000 Adams, Amos Douglas D Sacramento 12th (1861) Union Sacramento 14th (1863) Adams, Anthony R Los Angeles, San Bernardino 2007–2010 Adams, E. G. D Madera, Merced 46th (1925) D, R Madera, Merced 47th (1927), 48th (1929) Adams, James R Sonoma 23rd (1880) Adams, L. B. D Yolo 27th (1887), 28th (1889) Adams, P. R. D Santa Cruz 30th (1893) Adams, W.S. D Kern, Tulare 22nd (1877) Adkison, D.O. Whig Yuba 6th (1855) Union Yuba 14th (1863) Aghazarian, Greg R San Joaquin, Stanislaus 2003–2008 2 Agnos, Art D San Francisco 1977–1988 Aguiar, Fred R Los Angeles, San Bernardino 1993–1998 3 Alarcón, Richard D Los Angeles 2007 4 Alatorre, Richard J. D Los Angeles 1973–1985 5 Alby, Barbara R Sacramento 1993–1998 Aldrich, W. A R San Francisco 19th (1871) Ind San Francisco 20th (1873) Aldridge, Frank D, Peo. P. Santa Cruz 32nd (1897) Alejo, Luis D Monterey, San Benito, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz 2011–2016 Alexander, Charles O. R Alameda 27th (1887), 28th (1889) Alexander, J. S. R Stanislaus 29th (1891) Alexander, John K. D Monterey, San Benito 40th (1913) Alford, William H. D Tulare 30th (1893) Allen, Bruce F. R Santa Clara 1953–1962 Allen, Charles D.
    [Show full text]