Crystal Reports

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Crystal Reports THE NEW YORK CITY LANDMARKS PRESERVATION COMMISSION 1 CENTRE STREET 9TH FLOOR NORTH NEW YORK NY 10007 TEL: 212 669-7700 FAX: 212 669-7780 PERMIT CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS ISSUE DATE: EXPIRATION DATE: DOCKET #: COFA #: 01/04/2013 10/23/2018 13-9592 COFA 13-9527 ADDRESS BOROUGH: BLOCK/LOT: 116 SULLIVAN STREET INDIVIDUAL LANDMARK 116 SULLIVAN STREET HOUSE MANHATTAN 504/29 Display This Permit While Work Is In Progress ISSUED TO: Richard Fertig 116 Sullivan Street New York, NY 10012 Pursuant to Section 25-307 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, the Landmarks Preservation Commission, at the Public Meeting of October 23, 2012, following the Public Hearing of the same date, voted to approve a proposal for certain work, as put forward in your application completed on September 27, 2012, and as you were notified in Statue Update Letter 13-7366 (LPC 13-7085), issued October 23, 2012. The approval will expire on October 23, 2018. The proposed work, as approved, consists of the removal of the three existing windows, and surrounding masonry, at the first floor of the non-visible rear façade, and the installation of new steel doors with transoms set within a new masonry opening created by combining and expanding the existing window openings in width and height; the construction of a new metal deck at the rear façade leading from the first floor to the rear yard; and the installation of a new security camera within the brownstone door surround at the main entrance; as shown in presentation boards consisting of existing condition photographs, and drawings A-107.L1, dated 10/12/12, and A-108.00, dated 8/15/12, prepared by Frank Lombardo, and a sample of the camera to be used, and presented at the October 23, 2012 Public Hearing and Public Meeting. In reviewing this proposal, the Commission noted that the 116 Sullivan Street House designation report describes 116 Sullivan Street as a Federal style house built in 1832, with the top two stories added in 1872. The Commission also noted that the brownstone door surround was modified prior to designation. The Commission further noted that while the door enframement is an original feature of the building, the six-panel door is not original. With regard to the proposal, the Commission found that the proposed work will not eliminate any significant architectural features from the rear facade; that the proposed work is not visible from a public thoroughfare; that the proposed door opening will retain the masonry on either end of the existing windows and will only involve the removal of the brick piers between the windows and the brick beneath the windows, and therefore will retain the scale and character of this individual house; that the design of the proposed doors will retain the residential character of the house; that the proposed deck will not obscure, conceal or overwhelm any significant feature; and that the new security camera will be installed at the flat, non-decorative return of the front entrance surround which is to be restored, therefore its installation will not result in any damage to any historic fabric, and its presence will not detract from any significant architectural features of the building. Based on these findings, the Commission determined the proposed work to be appropriate to the building and the historic district, and voted to approve it. However, the Commission made its determination subject to the stipulation that two signed and sealed copies of Department of Buildings filing drawings for the approved work be submitted for review and approval. Subsequently, on December 14, 2012, the Landmarks Preservation Commission received final drawings T-101.00, A-101.00 through A-105.00, A-107.00 through A-112.00, A-114.00, A-115.00, A-116.00, A-119.00, A-120.00, D-101.00, D-102.00, D-103.00, S-101.00, S-102.00, M-101.00, M-102.00, P-101.00, and FP-101.00 through FP-105.00, dated 12/12/12, drawing A-106.00, dated 10/12/12, and drawings A-117.00 and A-118.00, dated 8/15/12, all prepared by Frank A. Lombardo, R.A. Accordingly, staff reviewed the drawings and found that the proposal approved by the Commission has been maintained. In addition, staff noted the inclusion of the following additional work: interior alterations at the cellar, basement, and 1st through 4th floors; exterior work at the front façade, including the removal of the existing non-historic nine-over-one and six-over-one double-hung windows, and their replacement with thirteen (13) six-over-six double-hung wood windows at the basement, and first through fourth floors, painted white, and with new operable, louvered shutters, painted blue (Benjamin Moore HC-155 "Newburyport Blue"), with a design to match those found at 203 Prince Street, an Individual Landmark and Federal-style brick rowhouse of a similar age, located around the corner from 116 Sullivan Street; the in-kind replacement of the solid, six-paneled wood door, painted blue (Benjamin Moore HC-155 "Newburyport Blue"), with a mail slot and bronze kick-plate; the removal of the existing fire escape and existing through-wall AC units at the front façade, and the repair of the façade as necessary with new bricks to match existing; the removal of the existing white paint at the brownstone base of the building, and the restoration of the brownstone as needed; the removal of the existing non-historic brownstone door surround, and its restoration to match the historic layout, including the wide keystone, and with exterior decorative details to match the historic Federal details found at 203 Prince Street; and the restoration of the brownstone stoop; with all brownstone repairs to use a brownstone tinted Portland cement and lime based mortar; the removal of the existing non-historic metal railings at the stoop and areaway, and their replacement with new cast iron handrails and decorative newel posts at the stoop and new railings at the areaway, with Federal style details to match those found at 203 Prince Street; the installation of a new intercom system embedded within the return of the new built-up brownstone surround adjacent to the door; and the removal of the existing non-historic door at the basement entranceway at the deep areaway, and its replacement with a new metal-and-glass door; exterior work at the non-visible rear façade, including the removal of the nine (9) existing windows at the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th floors, and their replacement with six (6) new one-over-one double-hung aluminum windows at the 2nd and 4th floors, and with two (2) aluminum-and-glass casement windows within expanded window openings and with new brick infill at an existing window opening at the 3rd floor; and the removal of the existing fire escape; exterior work at the non-visible rear yard, including the installation of new planters and a new wood fence at a portion of the rear yard; and exterior work at the roof, including the demolition of the existing stair bulkhead, and construction of a new slightly larger stair bulkhead; the construction of a new wood deck with planters, a pergola, and lattice screening and wood fencing; and the installation of new AC units on new steel dunnage at the rear of the roof, with all new rooftop construction and installations not to be visible from Sullivan Street. With regard to the additional work, the Commission finds, in accordance with the Rules of the City of New York, Title 63, Section 3-04(c)(2), that the new windows at the front façade will match the historic windows in terms of configuration, operations, details, material, and finish. The Commission also finds that the operable wood shutters will be in keeping with a building of this age and style, and that they will not detract from the significant architectural features of the building; that the new door will be in keeping with the design of doors typically PAGE 2 Issued: 1/4/13 DOCKET: 13-9592 found at buildings of this age and style; and that the paint color of the shutters and front door will be in keeping with the age and style of the building. The Commission also finds, in accordance with the R.C.N.Y., Title 63, Section 2-13, that the fire escapes to be removed are not original to the building; that they do not have architectural merit in themselves; that the fire escapes are not mentioned in the LPC designation report; that the building is not located within an historic district; that any damage to the façade will be repaired to match the adjacent fabric; and that the removal of the fire escapes will not leave gaps, holes, or unsightly conditions on the façade. The Commission also finds, in accordance with the R.C.N.Y., Title 63, Section 2-17(c), that the authenticity for the restoration of the brownstone entrance surround and new ironwork is documented by historic photographic evidence and a building of a similar age and style; and that the restoration will not cause the removal of significant historic fabric that may have been added over time and that are evidence of the history and development of the building. The Commission also finds, in accordance with the R.C.N.Y., Title 63, Section 2-14, that brownstone portions of the facade and stoop are exfoliating, damaged or otherwise unsound; that the original texture, color, profiles and details of the brownstone will be replicated; that the damaged stone will be cut back to sound stone and the new surface will be keyed into the sound stone and will be built up in successive layers using a cementitious mix with the top layer tinted and finished to match the original brownstone texture and color; and that the methods and materials proposed by the architect have been provided in the form of written specifications.
Recommended publications
  • Report: Federal Houses Landmarked Or Listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places 1999
    GREENWICH VILLAGE SOCIETY FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION Making the Case Federal Houses Landmarked or Listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places 1999-2016 The many surviving Federal houses in Lower Manhattan are a special part of the heritage of New York City. The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation has made the documentation and preservation of these houses an important part of our mission. This report highlights the Society’s mission in action by showing nearly one hundred fifty of these houses in a single document. The Society either proposed the houses in this report for individual landmark designation or for inclusion in historic districts, or both, or has advocated for their designation. Special thanks to Jiageng Zhu for his efforts in creating this report. 32 Dominick Street, built c.1826, landmarked in 2012 Federal houses were built between ca. 1790 to ca. 1835. The style was so named because it was the first American architectural style to emerge after the Revolutionary War. In elevation and plan, Federal Period row houses were quite modest. Characterized by classical proportions and almost planar smoothness, they were ornamented with simple detailing of lintels, dormers, and doorways. These houses were typically of load bearing masonry construction, 2-3 stories high, three bays wide, and had steeply pitched roofs. The brick facades were laid in a Flemish bond which alternated a stretcher and a header in every row. All structures in this report were originally built as Federal style houses, though
    [Show full text]
  • **-Sheriffs Ads March 2006
    Advertisements appearing for First Time erected on said lot must cost not less than $2,500.00. Miscellaneous Notices BEING the same premises which Christopher T. Fuller and Diane Fuller, husband and wife, by Deed dated November 18, 2002, and recorded November 21, 2002, in Book 4834, Page 358, SHERIFF SALE! granted and conveyed, unto Michael A. Friedrich, By virtue of certain writs of Execution issued single individual, in fee. out of the Court of Common Pleas and Orphans’ SEIZED, taken in execution and to be sold as Court of Dauphin County, Pa., and to me the property of Michael A. Freidrich, the mort- directed, I will expose at Public Sale or Outcry, at gagor herein, under Judgment No. 2005 CV 4124 the Dauphin County Administration Building in MF. the City of Harrisburg, Dauphin County, Pa., on BEING DESIGNATED AS TAX PARCEL No. Thursday, April 13, 2006 at 10:00 A.M. the fol- 24-006-098. lowing real estate to wit: NOTICE is further given to all parties in interest and claimants. Schedule of proposed distributions will be filed by the Sheriff of No. 1 – STEVEN K. EISENBERG, Esq. Dauphin County, on Monday, May 15, 2006 and ALL THAT CERTAIN messuage, tenement distributions will be made in accordance with the and tract of land situate in the Township of Derry, said schedule unless exceptions are filed thereto County of Dauphin and Commonwealth of within ten (10) days thereafter. Pennsylvania, on the south side of Harding Avenue, on the Plan of Lots known as “Palmdale”, as laid out by Eugene W.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Citytm
    The Internationalist ® The Top 10 Guide to New York The Top 10 Guide to New York CityTM The Internationalist 96 Walter Street/Suite 200 Boston, MA 02131 USA The Internationalist • www.internationalist.com • 617-354-7755 1 The Internationalist ® The Top 10 Guide to New York The Internationalist® International Business, Investment and Travel Published by: The Internationalist Publishing Company 96 Walter Street/Suite 200 Boston, MA 02131, USA Tel: 617-354-7722 [email protected] Author: Patrick W. Nee Copyright © 2001 by PWN The Internationalist is a Registered Trademark. The Top 10 Guide to New York City, The Top 10 Travel Guides, The Top 10 Guides are Trademarks of the Internationalist Publishing Company. All right are reserved under International, Pan-American and Pan-Asian Conventions. No part of this book, no lists, no maps or illustration may be reproduced in any form without the written permission of the publisher. All rights vigorously enforced. ISBN: 1-891382-21-7 Special Sales: Books of the Internationalist Publishing Company are available for bulk purchases at special discounts for sales promotions, corporate identity programs or premiums. The Internationalist Publishing Company publishes books on international business, investment and travel. For further information contact the Special Sales department at: Special Sales, The Internationalist, 96 Walter Street/Suite 200, Boston, MA 02131. The Internationalist Publishing Company 96 Walter Street/Suite 200 Boston, MA 02131 USA Tel: 617-354-7722 [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] web site: http://www.internationalist.com The Internationalist • www.internationalist.com • 617-354-7755 2 The Internationalist ® The Top 10 Guide to New York Welcome to New York City.
    [Show full text]
  • 94 GREENWICH STREET HOUSE, 94 Greenwich Street (Aka 14-18 Rector Street), Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission June 23, 2009, Designation List 414 LP-2218 94 GREENWICH STREET HOUSE, 94 Greenwich Street (aka 14-18 Rector Street), Manhattan. Built c. 1799-1800; fourth story added by 1858; rear addition c. 1853/1873. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 53, Lot 41. On January 30, 2007, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the 94 Greenwich Street House and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 1). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Twelve people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, Municipal Art Society of New York, New York Landmarks Conservancy, and Historic Districts Council. In addition, the Commission received a number of communications in support of designation, including a letter from Augustine Hicks Lawrence III, a sixth-generation descendant of the original owner. One of the property’s owners, who oppose designation, appeared at the June 23, 2009, public meeting and requested a postponement of the vote. The building had been previously heard by the Commission on October 19, 1965, and June 23, 1970 (LP-0049). Summary The Federal style rowhouse at No. 94 Greenwich Street in Lower Manhattan was constructed c.1799-1800 as an investment property, right after this block was created through landfill and Greenwich and Rector Streets had been laid out. At the time, this was the most fashionable neighborhood for New York’s social elite and wealthy merchant class.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Department of Buildings Architectural Drawings and Plans for Lower Manhattan, Circa 1866-1978 Collection No
    NEW YORK CITY MUNICIPAL ARCHIVES 31 CHAMBERS ST., NEW YORK, NY 10007 Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 Collection No. REC 0074 Processing, description, and rehousing by the Rolled Building Plans Project Team (2018-ongoing): Amy Stecher, Porscha Williams Fuller, David Mathurin, Clare Manias, Cynthia Brenwall. Finding aid written by Amy Stecher in May 2020. NYC Municipal Archives Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 1 NYC Municipal Archives Guide to the Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan, circa 1866-1978 Summary Record Group: RG 025: Department of Buildings Title of the Collection: Department of Buildings architectural drawings and plans for Lower Manhattan Creator(s): Manhattan (New York, N.Y.). Bureau of Buildings; Manhattan (New York, N.Y.). Department of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department of Housing and Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Department for the Survey and Inspection of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Fire Department. Bureau of Inspection of Buildings; New York (N.Y.). Tenement House Department Date: circa 1866-1978 Abstract: The Department of Buildings requires the filing of applications and supporting material for permits to construct or alter buildings in New York City. This collection contains the plans and drawings filed with the Department of Buildings between 1866-1978, for the buildings on all 958 blocks of Lower Manhattan, from the Battery to 34th Street, as well as a small quantity of material for blocks outside that area.
    [Show full text]
  • Landmarks Preservation Commission November 17, 2009, Designation List 423 LP-2345
    Landmarks Preservation Commission November 17, 2009, Designation List 423 LP-2345 145 EIGHTH AVENUE HOUSE, Manhattan Built c.1827, architects, unknown Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 741, Lot 31 On June 23, 2009, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation of the 145 Eighth Avenue House and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 4). The hearing was duly advertised according to provisions of law. The two co-owners of the building opposed the designation. Three witnesses spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of the Historic Districts Council, the Society for the Architecture of the City, and Community Board 4. Summary The modest rowhouse at 145 Eighth Avenue is one of a pair of highly intact 3 1/2 story Federal style houses constructed 1827 for owner Aaron Dexter, a dry goods merchant, who retained ownership of the property until 1846. At the time of its completion 145 Eighth Avenue was situated between Greenwich Village and Chelsea. No. 145 Eighth Avenue has continuously housed both residential tenants and businesses, reflecting the evolving commercial character of Eighth Avenue. Over the course of centuries, the original storefront configuration of the ground floor has had several alterations, most notably the historic 1940 arcaded shop front. This row house, in concert with its neighbor at 147 Eighth Avenue, is intact above its storefront and exhibits all of the attributes of Federal style houses of the era. The building has a steeply pitched roof with double dormer windows, shares a party wall and central chimney with its neighbor, and a façade clad in Flemish bond brickwork.
    [Show full text]
  • 32 DOMINICK STREET HOUSE, 32 Dominick Street, Manhattan Built C
    Landmarks Preservation Commission March 27, 2012, Designation List 453 LP-2480 32 DOMINICK STREET HOUSE, 32 Dominick Street, Manhattan Built c. 1826; builder, Smith Bloomfield Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 5778, Lot 64 On June 28, 2011, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the 32 Dominick Street House and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 6). The hearing was duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. There were four speakers in favor of designation, including representatives of the New York Landmarks Conservancy, the Society for the Architecture of New York, the Historic Districts Council and the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. A letter in opposition to designation was received from the owner. Summary The 32 Dominck Street House was one of twelve Federal style brick row houses (nos. 28 to 50) built in c. 1826 on the south side of Dominick Street between Hudson and Varick Streets; and was one of the five houses (nos. 28 to 36) constructed by builder Smith Bloomfield. A secession of tenants lived in the house while owned by Bloomfield and it was sold by the executors of his estate to Mary McKindley in 1866. Her heirs conveyed it to John F. Wilson, a carpenter, in 1878. Wilson’s devisee sold it to the Church of Our Lady of Vilnius, which used it as a rectory. The church, located on Broome Street, was founded to serve the Lithuanian Catholic community and closed in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Hamilton-Holly House Designation Report
    Landmarks Preservation Commission October 19, 2004, Designation List 357 LP-2157 HAMILTON-HOLLY HOUSE, 4 St. Mark’s Place, Manhattan. Built 1831. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 463, Lot 11. On May 18, 2004, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the Hamilton-Holly House and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 2). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Ten people spoke in favor of designation, including representatives of State Senator Thomas K. Duane, State Assemblymember Deborah J. Glick, City Councilmember Margarita Lopez, the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, Historic Districts Council, and New York Landmarks Conservancy. One of the building’s owners appeared at the hearing, but took no position in regard to designation. In addition, the Commission received a letter in support of designation from the Municipal Art Society. Summary The large town house at 4 St. Mark’s Place in the East Village section of Manhattan was constructed in 1831 in the Federal style, characterized and made notable by its unusual 26-foot width and 3-1/2-story height, Flemish bond brickwork, high stoop, long parlor- floor windows, Gibbs surround entrance with triple keystone and vermiculated blocks, white marble base with openings also with Gibbs surrounds, molded pediment lintels, peaked roof, and double segmental dormers. The entire block of St. Mark’s Place (East 8th Street) between Third and Second Avenues was built by English-born real estate developer Thomas E. Davis, who sold this house in 1833 to Col.
    [Show full text]
  • About Federal Houses
    In 1997, GVSHP received a grant from the Preserve New York Program, a re-grant program of the Preservation League of New York State and the New York State Council on the Arts, to document and advocate for the preservation of the remaining federal-era houses in Lower Manhattan. At the time, it was believed that about three hundred thirty such structures survived, but about half lacked any landmark protection or were not recognized by the State and National Registers of Historic Places. In the intervening two decades, GVSHP has managed to successfully advocate for one hundred thirty-six of these houses being landmarked and/or listed on the State and National Registers of Historic Places. This includes thirteen individual NYC landmarks, nine NYC historic districts or historic district extensions, and the South Village State and National Register Historic District, which contains ninety- six federal-era houses among its approximately seven hundred fifty buildings. Twenty years after the initial grant, the documentation and preservation of the many surviving Federal houses in Lower Manhattan remain a special and ongoing part of the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation’s mission. This report celebrates the enduring legacy of that grant and our ongoing effort to protect and celebrate these precious historic buildings. GVSHP Executive Director Vicki Weiner and staffer Susan DeVries with Anthony C. Wood and Anne Van Ingen in 1997 on the stoop of 7 Leroy Street receiving the Preserve New York federal houses grant. 7 Leroy Street also appears on the cover of the report. About Federal Houses 32 Dominick Street, built c.1826, landmarked in 2012 Federal houses were built between ca.
    [Show full text]
  • 116 SULLIVAN STREET, Borough of Hanhattan
    Landmarks Preservation Commission May 15, 1973, Calendar Number 4 LP-0645 116 SULLIVAN STREET, Borough of Hanhattan. Ruilt 1832; architect unknown. Landmark Site: Borough of r1anhattan Tax fvlap Block 504, Lot 29. On February 3, 1970, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of I 16 Sui I ivan Street and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site. (Item t~o. 8). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. The repre­ sentative of Community Board No. 2 and four witnesses, inc I ud i ng the 1..rife of the mr:>r spoke in favor of designation. There \'/ere no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The front of this Federal style house is of red brick, laid up in Flemish bond. The original pitched roof was doubtless of slate but the house was raised two stories in 1872. The present window I intels, with their heavy cap moldings, and the sil Is with corbels were probably covered with sheetmetal at the same time. The glory of I 16 Sui I ivan Street is the elaborate enframement of the front door within its simple round -arched masonry opening. The opening itself is flanked by plain brownstone pilasters, and by a flush-faced semi-circular band of brownstone defining the arch. The treatment of the side! ights was rare in its own time and is unique today. It is of great significance to New York domestic architecture. They are flanked by slender wood Ionic columns, backed by wood carved to resemble stone rustication.
    [Show full text]
  • The South Village: a Proposal for Historic District Designation by Andrew S
    TThhee SSoouutthh VViillllaaggee:: A Proposal for Historic District Designation Report by Andrew S. Dolkart Commissioned by the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation 232 East 11th Street, New York, NY 10003 212-475-9585 www.gvshp.org Report funded by Preserve New York, a grant program of the Preservation League of New York State and the New York State Council on the Arts Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation 232 East 11th Street, New York, NY 10003 212-475-9585 212-475-9582 Fax www.gvshp.org [email protected] Board of Trustees: Mary Ann Arisman, President Arthur Levin, Vice President Linda Yowell, Vice President Katherine Schoonover, Secretary/Treasurer Penelope Bareau Meredith Bergmann Elizabeth Ely Jo Hamilton Leslie Mason Ruth McCoy Florent Morellet Peter Mullan Andrew S. Paul Jonathan Russo Judith Stonehill Arbie Thalacker George Vellonakis Fred Wistow F. Anthony Zunino III Staff: Andrew Berman, Executive Director Melissa Baldock, Director of Preservation and Research Sheryl Woodruff, Director of Operations Drew Durniak, Office Manager & Administrative Director TThhee SSoouutthh VViillllaaggee:: A Proposal for Historic District Designation Report by Andrew S. Dolkart Commissioned by the Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation Report funded by Preserve New York, a grant program of the Preservation League of New York State and the New York State Council on the Arts © The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation, 2006. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation would like to thank Preserve New York, a grant program of the Preservation League of New York State and the New York State Council on the Arts, for funding this report.
    [Show full text]
  • South Village Tour
    Entrance, 140 West 4th Street Virtual Tour The map below features links to images and information about streets, houses, tenements, apartment buildings, theaters and churches in the South Village. The links include buildings that are as much as 200 years old and embody some of the richest history in the Village and in New York. They tell the story of the founding of Greenwich Village as a refuge from the yellow fever epidemics of New York City (then the southern tip of Manhattan) in the early 19th century, of the South Village's role as a center of immigrant life in the late 19th century, as a center for artists, bohemians, and "free-thinkers" in the early 20th century, of beatniks, hippies, folk musicians, and the counterculture in the second half of the 20th century, and today, as an eclectic mix of old and new, avant-garde and traditional, gritty and glamorous, sacred and profane. Unfortunately, the South Village is not in a New York City historic district, and therefore is not protected from inappropriate demolitions, alterations, or new construction. The Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation is seeking to change this, and is working to protect this area through research, documentation, advocacy, and education, which we hope will lead to recognition of its unique and valuable historic and architectural features, and the enactment of historic district protections. Read more. Click on the links on the map below for more information and pictures of each site. Map generously provided by Edward Camp of Geographic Business Systems of Paramus 201-587-1717, www.geobussys.com.
    [Show full text]