This Is Not Florida How Al Franken Won the Minnesota Senate Recount by Jay Weiner Publication Date: October 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

This Is Not Florida How Al Franken Won the Minnesota Senate Recount by Jay Weiner Publication Date: October 2010 This Is Not Florida How Al Franken Won the Minnesota Senate Recount by Jay Weiner Publication date: October 2010 University of Minnesota Press $24.95 Hardcover ISBN 978-0-8166-7038-3 268 pages 6 X 9 The behind-the-scenes story of the historic Franken—Coleman Minnesota Senate recount On July 7, 2009, Al Franken was sworn in as Minnesota’s junior U.S. senator—eight months after Election Night. In the chill of November 2008, Republican incumbent Norm Coleman led by a slim 215 votes, a margin that triggered an automatic statewide recount of more than 2.9 million ballots. Minnesota’s ensuing recount, and the contentious legal and public relations battle that would play out between the Franken and Coleman lawyers and staff, simultaneously fascinated and frustrated Minnesotans and the nation—all while a filibuster- proof Senate hung in the balance. This Is Not Florida is the behind-the-scenes saga of the largest, longest, and most expensive election recount in American history. Reporter Jay Weiner covered the entire recount. Based on daily reporting as well as interviews, This Is Not Florida dives into the motivations of key players in the drama, including the exploits of Franken’s lead attorney Marc Elias; reveals some of the mistakes made by Coleman advisers; and explains how the Franken team’s devotion to data collection helped Franken win the recount by a mere 312 votes. In a fascinating, blow-by-blow account of the historic recount that captivated people nationwide, Jay Weiner gets inside campaign war rooms and judges’ chambers and takes the reader from the uncertainties of Election Night 2008, through the controversial State Canvassing Board and a grueling eight-week trial, to an appeal to Minnesota’s Supreme Court, and finally to Al Franken’s long-awaited swearing-in. This Is Not Florida presents an unforgettable moment in political history that proved that it’s never really over until it’s actually over. Jay Weiner reported on the 2008 U.S. Senate recount and election contest for MinnPost.com, a Minneapolis–St. Paul news Web site. For his coverage, he received Minnesota’s prestigious Frank Premack Public Affairs Journalism Award. A longtime Twin Cities sportswriter, he is the author of Stadium Games: Fifty Years of Big League Greed and Bush League Boondoggles (Minnesota, 2000). He lives and works in St. Paul. Please consider a review or feature of This Is Not Florida, or an interview with the author. Please contact Heather Skinner, Publicist, at [email protected] with questions, requests, or comments. ### For more information, please visit: www.ThisIsNotFlorida.com www.jayweiner.com Q&A with Jay Weiner Author of This Is Not Florida How Al Franken Won the Minnesota Senate Recount Publication date: October 2010 University of Minnesota Press $24.95 Hardcover ISBN 978-0-8166-7038-3 268 pages 6 X 9 1. You were a sports writer for 30 years. How in the world did you get into writing a book about the Al Franken-Norm Coleman Senate recount? Quite serendipitously. I had just returned from covering the 2008 Summer Olympics for a number of news organizations. I had set up a one-man news bureau in Beijing. MinnPost.com, the then-fledgling Web site in Minneapolis-St. Paul, was one of my main outlets. I had been writing for MinnPost since its inception in the fall of 2007, which was soon after I left the Minneapolis Star Tribune. After I returned from China, sometime in October the editors at MinnPost wondered if I would ever consider covering politics. I said, "Why not?" I'd been around stadium finance politics for 15 years. But never, really, electoral politics. I wrote a couple of features about local election issues, but nothing about the Franken-Coleman campaign. Indeed, I barely followed the campaign because of my Olympics immersion. A week after Election Day, the MinnPost guys asked: "Can you help out on the recount?" "Help out" turned into eight months, all day, everyday, full-time. 2. Covering an event is one thing, but writing a book? Why? I'd been around the recount for about a month and was sitting, bored stiff, at a state Canvassing Board meeting. I had written an impressionistic piece about the day-to-day rhythm of the recount. I’ve peppered some of those impressions about Franken lawyer Marc Elias and Coleman lawyer Fritz Knaak throughout the book. Eric Schultz, Al Franken's communications director, sidled up to me during a lull in a hearing and said, "You should write the book about this." I said, "No way. No money. No knowledge. Didn't cover the campaign. Got other stuff to do." Well, I got to thinking. And then the darned recount lasted into 2009, and there I was in a courtroom everyday for two months and began to outline the project. And here we are. 3. The book is about the recount, but it's not really about Franken or Coleman. Why? I do describe the campaign in detail in Chapter 5, and attempt to describe the candidates. They were, of course, the central figures of the entire election. But This Is Not Florida is a tale of decisions made and not made by lawyers and political operatives. It is, more or less, a how-to for others who might face a recount. But it's a how-to filled with anecdotes and behind-the-scenes episodes. Coleman's political story is somewhat widely known. Franken is still a political work in progress. This book is more about Franken's chief lawyer Marc Elias, his colleagues Kevin Hamilton and David Lillehaug, and Franken's campaign manager Stephanie Schriock. It's also about the Coleman decision-makers. Why they did -- and didn't -- take certain actions. It’s also an inside look at the Franken organization and why and how it won the recount and election. 4. Some Republican activists and media outlets -- such as the Wall Street Journal -- stated during the recount and after that there was fraud in the election, that Franken and his lawyers stole the Senate seat. Do you agree? Not at all. Not a bit. In fact, during the ultimate election contest trial when Coleman's legal team had the chance in court to prove fraud, to prove irregularities, they barely tried. Outside the courtroom, in media events, they tried to show mischief and inconsistencies among election officials statewide, but what happens in hallways outside of courts doesn't prove a thing. In the end, every ballot that was cast in the 2008 Senate election -- either via machine or absentee -- was examined by non-partisan election officials, and some ballots were examined twice and three times. Coleman's side had numerous chances to challenge ballots. They had an opportunity to block absentee ballots they didn't want entered in the count. They had a trial to introduce evidence of voters whose ballots were improperly rejected. They had four judges on the state Canvassing Board -- two Republicans -- and three judges on the trial court -- one appointed by a Republican governor, another by Jesse Ventura -- and five judges on the Minnesota Supreme Court -- three appointed by Republicans -- and all these judges came down on the side of finding that Franken won. Fraud? Tell me where? 5. But how did the election flip, from Coleman ahead by 215 in November to Franken ahead by 312 in April? First of all, election counts always change in the weeks after Election Day. Sometimes by thousands of votes, but no one ever pays attention when someone like Senator Amy Klobuchar wins by 300,000 votes. So, it is not uncommon for numbers to shift. Secondly, Franken’s side did do a better job of analyzing hand-counted ballots and challenging Coleman ballots. Besides, Democrats are notoriously sloppy voters, so some ballots that were challenged by Coleman were, indeed, valid Franken votes; they needed closer looks by the Canvassing Board. Finally, Franken’s absentee ballot chase turned into a gold mine. People forget that Franken won the actual recount by 49 votes. Then, with the addition of wrongly rejected absentee ballots, his lead soared to 312. 6. What were some of the biggest surprises to you about the recount? I write about them in the book. For one, I didn't know -- and I don't think it has previously been written -- how much the Barack Obama campaign distanced itself from the Franken campaign. If Obama would have shown up just once during the final days of the Senate campaign, I believe he would have pushed Franken over the top. But they shunned Franken. The second surprise -- not to me, but others -- was the role of Supreme Court Chief Justice Eric Magnuson. The Franken side expected him to be in Coleman's camp. The Coleman side really expected him to rule in their favor. But he didn't. He impressed all sorts of folks with his balanced approach on the Canvassing Board. It really annoyed the Coleman camp. Thirdly, I was surprised by the power of non-decisions made. A key one: when the Canvassing Board first ruled that improperly rejected absentee ballots shouldn't be included in the count, Franken lawyer Marc Elias had a choice to go to the state Supreme Court and challenge the board. He decided to cool his jets and see how it all played out. It was the best decision of the recount. In the end, the board flipped on its attitude towards the absentees, and it forced Coleman to run the Supreme Court to block the count of more votes.
Recommended publications
  • United States District Court District of Minnesota
    CASE 0:13-cv-03029-JRT-TNL Document Filed 11/29/16 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA LEONARD J. RICHARDS, Civil No. 13-3029 (JRT/JSM) Plaintiff, v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, by Lori R. Swanson, its Attorney General; MIKE HERMERDING, State Program Administrative Manager Principal of the Department of Corrections of the State of Minnesota (“DOC”), in his individual and official capacities; SHEILA PACKWOOD, Food Program Director of the DOC, in her individual and official MEMORANDUM OPINION capacities; NANETTE M. LARSON, Health AND ORDER ON REPORT Services Director of the DOC, in her individual AND RECOMMENDATION OF and official capacities; THOMAS A. ROY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED Commissioner of the DOC, in his individual and JANUARY 14, 2016 official capacities also known as Tom Roy; MARK BRANDT DAYTON, Governor of the State of Minnesota, in his official capacity also known as Mark Dayton; STEPHEN F. SIMON, Secretary of State of the State of Minnesota, in his individual capacity also known as Steve Simon, and BRADLEY K. ANDERSON Election Administrator of the Secretary, in his individual capacity also known as Brad Anderson; and all persons in concern with any of the defendants or on their behalf, Defendants. Leonard J. Richards, No. 149837, MCF-Stillwater, 970 Pickett Street North, Bayport, MN 55003, pro se. Margaret E. Jacot, Assistant Attorney General, MINNESOTA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 900, St. Paul, MN 55101, for defendants. Plaintiff Leonard J. Richards is an inmate at the Minnesota Correctional Facility in Stillwater, Minnesota (“MCF-Stillwater”). Richards commenced the instant action against 36 CASE 0:13-cv-03029-JRT-TNL Document Filed 11/29/16 Page 2 of 15 the State of Minnesota (“State”), Minnesota Secretary of State Donald Mark Ritchie, Minnesota Election Administrator Brad Anderson, Minnesota Data Practices Compliance Officer Bert Black, Minnesota Commissioner of Correction Thomas A.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo – He's Not the Worst #Metoo Man but His
    New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo – He’s Not the Worst #MeToo Man But his PR is Near the Bottom Andrew Blum When you look at all the #MeToo men who did bad things to women – and some to men – there are gradations of evil. Al Franken is not Harvey Weinstein, and Louis CK is not Jeffrey Epstein. New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a relatively recent addition to the #MeToo list, acted very badly to 11 women, according to a just completed investigation but he’s not worst. What he is horrible at was spinning the probe and its findings. All during the investigation, he held public events like nothing was wrong, often not letting the press attend or ask questions. Then on August 3, after New York Attorney General Letitia James released a 165-page report accusing him of the sexual harassment, he released a pre-recorded video in which he showed no remorse, did not apologize, issued a flat-out tone-deaf denial, made no admission of his behavior, and sounded like he never heard of #MeToo or sexual harassment. He refused to resign. This prompted all his local, state and federal allies among Democratic Party officialdom, voters, unions and donors to all but desert him in the face of almost certain impeachment by the state legislature. They all called for him to resign – right up to and including President Biden. About the only person who said Cuomo should not resign was Rudy Giuliani! I think it is because of the #MeToo movement and thePR ramifications of the bad behavior of powerful men of his ilk that Cuomo received such a public and political rebuke of his actions after the report issued by the NY Attorney General.
    [Show full text]
  • The Grizzly, April 3, 1981 James Wilson Ursinus College
    Ursinus College Digital Commons @ Ursinus College Ursinus College Grizzly Newspaper Newspapers 4-3-1981 The Grizzly, April 3, 1981 James Wilson Ursinus College Barbara Foley Ursinus College Kenneth C. Taylor Ursinus College Jay Repko Ursinus College Duncan C. Atkins Ursinus College See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/grizzlynews Part of the Cultural History Commons, Higher Education Commons, Liberal Studies Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits oy u. Recommended Citation Wilson, James; Foley, Barbara; Taylor, Kenneth C.; Repko, Jay; Atkins, Duncan C.; Bassett, Jennifer; Wegman, Janet; Sacks, Martin; and Lazar, Joey, "The Grizzly, April 3, 1981" (1981). Ursinus College Grizzly Newspaper. 57. https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/grizzlynews/57 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Newspapers at Digital Commons @ Ursinus College. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ursinus College Grizzly Newspaper by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Ursinus College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors James Wilson, Barbara Foley, Kenneth C. Taylor, Jay Repko, Duncan C. Atkins, Jennifer Bassett, Janet Wegman, Martin Sacks, and Joey Lazar This book is available at Digital Commons @ Ursinus College: https://digitalcommons.ursinus.edu/grizzlynews/57 • rl Volume Three Number Eighteen Ursinus College, Collegeville, Pa. 19426 Friday, April 3, 1981 Faculty members promoted • • • Board of Directors Elects Corey to Five Year Term sor of History, as Chairman of the Township Commissioners, an of­ Samuel C. Corey, chairman of History Department.
    [Show full text]
  • SCENE ONE (An Empty Stage. There Is a Podium and a Projector Screen
    SCENE ONE (An empty stage. There is a podium and a projector screen emblazoned with the logo “WELLSTONE PROJECT.” A spotlight comes up on STEPHEN, who stands at the podium, dressed in formal attire. He carries a drink in his hand.) STEPHEN Thank you all for being here tonight – for your support – for honoring my brother’s life and legacy. (as HE speaks, the screen behind him flashes a portrait of Paul Wellstone) It would mean the world to them – Paul, and Sheila (the screen flashes a photo of Paul and Sheila together) – to see you all here tonight. (he sips his drink liberally and shakes himself out) I just want to apologize in advance – I never had my brother’s knack for public speaking. (HE chuckles nervously) But I always said… I always said my brother had a way of bringing people together… Sometimes in ways we might not expect. But – (the screen flashes a photo of a beach in Maryland) One way or another, it all leads back… to this. (without looking backward, the screen raises out of view, and the set changes to the beach seen in the photo, complete with a sunbathing SHEILA, reclining on a beach chair, reading a book) The beaches our parents took us to as kids… I haven’t set foot here in years, but I can still see it all like it was yesterday. (HE mimes to various parts of the set) The stand where they used to sell popsicles on hot days. (another) And over there, see? That’s where I built the biggest sandcastle you’d ever seen… Until Paul stepped in it.
    [Show full text]
  • Pageant Finalists Show Looks, Talent
    Friday Night Live AtGusma hilarity starts on page THE MIA URMCANE Volume 58, No. 10 Tuesday, September 29 1981 .Phone 284 4401 Pageant Finalists Show Looks, Talent ll\ JEAN C I Al 1)1 de la I KAM I \\l> I RISHA SINDLER lhe". were nervou .luu.s 1 hcv had butterflies, and thej v. ii ihi end, ten of them were glad they, had da I IMI young women who admitted Iha d nol ne'i'it ,i Ini nf prodding in gn after the : '•' l ni WTMU nl Miami in; 198 I 82 w en si li i li d iul entrants Saturday, nighl to compete in the finals on Oc­ tober 26 The selection of the in Finalists culminated a day ol interviews anel taleni routines before judges chosen from the UM facultv and the communit) "It seems t<• me thai we have even more beautiful girls than ever." said Jefl Becker, Horn ming chair­ man "They seem to have mun taleni ihan sn: other group i i an remember " Deborah Cichan typifies whal Beckei de i led \ virtuoso mi several instruments, the 20-year-old junior performed a jazz number on her saxophone fm thi tai fin set tion ol the pageant preliminary s "I have had nine \car ol playing experience, so I was nol nervous at all." Cichan said latei i was very comfortable " The pre-legal finance major explained whs she- is seeking the title "I am running because UM's standards are improv­ ing, and 1 fell I can be a definite asset lo thai improve­ ment," she said "This is a new experience fnr me I Hunk il is going to be fun " Nineteen-year-old sophomore 1 eslie Voogd dis­ played anothei aspect ol the versatility, e.i this year's contestants.
    [Show full text]
  • Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News Kathy Elrick Clemson University, [email protected]
    Clemson University TigerPrints All Dissertations Dissertations 12-2016 Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News Kathy Elrick Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations Recommended Citation Elrick, Kathy, "Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News" (2016). All Dissertations. 1847. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_dissertations/1847 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IRONIC FEMINISM: RHETORICAL CRITIQUE IN SATIRICAL NEWS A Dissertation Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Rhetorics, Communication, and Information Design by Kathy Elrick December 2016 Accepted by Dr. David Blakesley, Committee Chair Dr. Jeff Love Dr. Brandon Turner Dr. Victor J. Vitanza ABSTRACT Ironic Feminism: Rhetorical Critique in Satirical News aims to offer another perspective and style toward feminist theories of public discourse through satire. This study develops a model of ironist feminism to approach limitations of hegemonic language for women and minorities in U.S. public discourse. The model is built upon irony as a mode of perspective, and as a function in language, to ferret out and address political norms in dominant language. In comedy and satire, irony subverts dominant language for a laugh; concepts of irony and its relation to comedy situate the study’s focus on rhetorical contributions in joke telling. How are jokes crafted? Who crafts them? What is the motivation behind crafting them? To expand upon these questions, the study analyzes examples of a select group of popular U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rules of #Metoo
    University of Chicago Legal Forum Volume 2019 Article 3 2019 The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clarke, Jessica A. (2019) "The Rules of #MeToo," University of Chicago Legal Forum: Vol. 2019 , Article 3. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2019/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Chicago Legal Forum by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rules of #MeToo Jessica A. Clarke† ABSTRACT Two revelations are central to the meaning of the #MeToo movement. First, sexual harassment and assault are ubiquitous. And second, traditional legal procedures have failed to redress these problems. In the absence of effective formal legal pro- cedures, a set of ad hoc processes have emerged for managing claims of sexual har- assment and assault against persons in high-level positions in business, media, and government. This Article sketches out the features of this informal process, in which journalists expose misconduct and employers, voters, audiences, consumers, or professional organizations are called upon to remove the accused from a position of power. Although this process exists largely in the shadow of the law, it has at- tracted criticisms in a legal register. President Trump tapped into a vein of popular backlash against the #MeToo movement in arguing that it is “a very scary time for young men in America” because “somebody could accuse you of something and you’re automatically guilty.” Yet this is not an apt characterization of #MeToo’s paradigm cases.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G: Mailing List
    Appendix G: Mailing List Appendix G / Mailing List 187 Appendix G: Mailing List The following is an initial list of government offices, private organizations, and individuals who will receive notice of the availablity of this CCP. We continue to add to this list and expect to mail several thousand notices or summary CCPs. Elected Officials Sen. Mark Dayton Sen. Norm Coleman Rep. Jim Ramstad Rep. John Kline Rep. Mark Kennedy Rep. Betty McCollum Rep. Martin Sabo Rep. Collin Peterson Rep. Gil Gutknecht Gov. Tim Pawlenty Local Government City of Bloomington City of Arden Hills City of Eden Prairie City of Eagan City of Burnsville City of Savage City of Shakopee City of Chanhassen City of Chaska City of Carver City of Jordon Hennepin County Dakota County Carver County Scott County Sibley County Le Sueur County Rice County Waseca County Steel County Blue Earth County Nicollet County Ramsey County Appendix G / Mailing List 189 Washington County Chisago County Hennepin County Park District Metropolitan Airports Commission Hennepin County Soil and Water Conservation District Dakota County Soil and Water Conservation District Carver County Soil and Water Conservation District Scott County Soil and Water Conservation District Sibley County Soil and Water Conservation District Le Sueur County Soil and Water Conservation District Rice County Soil and Water Conservation District Waseca County Soil and Water Conservation District Steel County Soil and Water Conservation District Blue Earth County Soil and Water Conservation District Nicollet County Soil
    [Show full text]
  • A BOOK DISCUSSION Guide for This Is Not Florida by Jay Weiner
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PRESS • 1 THIS IS NOT FLORIDA • WEINER A BOOK DISCUSSION Guide for This Is Not Florida by Jay Weiner About tHE AutHoR Jay Weiner reported on the 2008 U.S. Senate recount and election contest for MinnPost.com, a Minneapolis–St. Paul news Web site. For his coverage, he received Minnesota’s prestigious Frank Premack Public Affairs Journalism Award. A longtime Twin Cities sportswriter, he is the author of Stadium Games: Fifty Years of Big League Greed and Bush League Boondoggles (Minnesota, 2000). He lives and works in St. Paul. PRAISE FoR THIS IS NOT FLORIDA “The epic Franken–Coleman affair made Bush–Gore 2000 seem like a brief encounter. What the national media in DC observed through binoculars, Jay Weiner saw through a microscope. He’s writ- ten a vivid tale of legal wrangling, political maneuvering, and chutzpah told with a sportswriter’s flair that puts to rest the notion that middle American politics are dull and shows that ‘Minnesota nice’ is nothing but an outdated cliche.” —Glenn Thrush, POLITICO “As nasty, ugly and unappealing as the battle between Al Franken and Norm Coleman was, watching the two sides explore every opportunity to pick up a vote or three in the post-election recount was just fascinating. ... The moral of the story is that every vote—every vote—counts.” —Ken Rudin, political editor for NPR in Washington, and writer for the “Political Junkie” blog “Weiner’s lively description of the ins and outs of the recount battle will please election junkies, political scientists and political consultants.” —Kirkus Reviews “It is a detailed accounting of the Coleman–Franken recount from start to finish ..
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 General Election Page:1 of 10 Summary for Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races November 6, 2012 General Election Registered Voters 148662 Num
    Election Summary Report Date:11/07/12 Time:02:50:21 2012 General Election Page:1 of 10 Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races November 6, 2012 General Election Registered Voters 148662 Num. Report Precinct 89 - Num. Reporting 89 100.00% President Vice President US Rep 6 Total Total Number of Precincts 89 Number of Precincts 13 Precincts Reporting 89 100.0 % Precincts Reporting 13 100.0 % Total Votes 142133 Total Votes 22788 BARACK OBAMA AND 70203 49.39% MICHELE BACHMANN 11402 50.04% MITT ROMNEY AND PAUL 69137 48.64% JIM GRAVES 11344 49.78% GARY JOHNSON AND JIM 1596 1.12% Write-in Votes 42 0.18% JILL STEIN AND CHERI 401 0.28% VIRGIL GOODE AND JIM 120 0.08% State Senator 38 JIM CARLSON AND GEOR 105 0.07% Total ROSS C. "ROCKY" ANDE 65 0.05% Number of Precincts 6 DEAN MORSTAD AND JOS 40 0.03% Precincts Reporting 6 100.0 % JAMES HARRIS AND MAU 29 0.02% Total Votes 8086 PETA LINDSAY AND YAR 15 0.01% ROGER CHAMBERLAIN 4731 58.51% Write-in Votes 422 0.30% TIMOTHY HENDERSON 3346 41.38% Write-in Votes 9 0.11% US Senator Total State Senator-39 Number of Precincts 89 Total Precincts Reporting 89 100.0 % Number of Precincts 30 Total Votes 138462 Precincts Reporting 30 100.0 % AMY KLOBUCHAR 88581 63.97% Total Votes 44779 KURT BILLS 45135 32.60% KARIN HOUSLEY 22642 50.56% STEPHEN WILLIAMS 3103 2.24% JULIE BUNN 22077 49.30% TIM DAVIS 1059 0.76% Write-in Votes 60 0.13% MICHAEL CAVLAN 477 0.34% Write-in Votes 107 0.08% State Senator-43 Total US Rep 2 Number of Precincts 11 Total Precincts Reporting 11 100.0 % Number of Precincts 17 Total Votes 18137 Precincts Reporting 17 100.0 % CHARLES "CHUCK" WIGE 10931 60.27% Total Votes 22329 DUANE E.
    [Show full text]
  • Nven Tracking-Casestudies10-25-13.Indd
    PART II :CASE STUDIES www.nonprofitvote.org Leadership Council Michael Weekes, Chair, Providers’ Council of Massachusetts, President and CEO Kyle Caldwell, C.S. Mott Foundation, Program Officer, Pathways Out of Poverty Cheryl Crawford, MassVOTE, Executive Director Tim Delaney, National Council of Nonprofits,President and CEO Jeannie Fox, Minnesota Council of Nonprofits,Deputy Public Policy Director David Heinen, N.C. Center for Nonprofits,Director of Public Policy and Advocacy Ashley Herad, Louisiana Budget Project, Director of Government Affairs and Outreach Qudsia Jafree, YWCA, Senior Policy Associate, Racial Justice & Civil Rights Linda Nguyen, Alliance for Children and Families, Director of Civic Engagement Laura Walling, Goodwill Industries International, Director of Advocacy & Legislative Affairs Marc Wetherhorn, National Association of Community Health Centers, Director of Advocacy and Civic Engagement National Advisory Board Diana Aviv, Independent Sector Maria Teresa Kumar, Voto Latino Harriet Barlow, Blue Mountain Center Kelly LeRoux, University of Illinois at Chicago Gary Bass, Bauman Family Foundation Daniella Levine, Catalyst Miami Jeffrey Berry, Tufts University Peter Levine, CIRCLE at Tufts University Kafi D. Blumenfield, Liberty Hill Foundation Dr. Michael McDonald, George Mason University Elizabeth Boris, Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy Michael McGrath, National Civic League John Bridgeland, Civic Enterprises, LLC Norman Ornstein, American Enterprise Institute Kari Dunn Saratovsky, KDS Strategies Jon Pratt, Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Pablo Eisenberg, Georgetown Public Policy Institute Miles Rapoport, Demos Kathay Feng, California Common Cause Hon. Mark Ritchie, Secretary of State of Minnesota Cynthia M. Gibson, The Philanthropic Initiative Gibran X. Rivera, Interaction Institute for Social Change Joan Growe, Former Secretary of State of Minnesota Mark Rosenman, The Union Institute Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • BEFORE the FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Brian Melendez, Chair, Minnesota Democratic-Fnrmer-Labor Party 255 East Plato Boulevard S
    BEFORE THE FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Brian Melendez, chair, Minnesota Democratic-Fnrmer-Labor Party 255 East Plato Boulevard St. Paul, MN 55107-1623, _ . O6C Complainant, MAY 0 1 V. Norm Coleman, 680 Transfer Rd., Stc. A St. Paul, MN 55114, MUR#_ Respondent. COMPLAINT Complainant files this complaint under 2 U.S.C. § 437g(a)(l) againsc Norm Coleman, requesting that the Federal Election Commission investigate violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act, as described below. A. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS Norm Coleman is a former United States Senator from the state of Minnesota. He was a candidate lor the United Stales Senate during the 2008 election cycle. On October 27, 2008, Paul McKim, Lhe founder and CEO of Houston-based Deep Marine Technologies ("DMT"), filed a sworn, notarized complaint in Texas state court against a group of DMT directors. In his complaint, McKim alleged that Nasser Kazeminy, a former controlling shareholder of DMT and a close friend of Coleman's, transferred $75,000 to Colemnn (a fourth installment of $25,000 was blocked by McKim). The payments were disguised as payments for insurance, and were fimneled through Coleman's wife's employer, the Plays Companies, an insurance broker in Minneapolis. A copy of the complaint is at Inched as Attachment A. -1- A recent sworn deposition, signed by another DMT executive, corroborates this story. According to BJ. Thomas, who was Chief Financial Officer of DMT at the time, Kazcminy attempted to Tunnel $100,000 lo Colcman through Ihc Hays Companies. Minneapolis Star Tribune, 3/27/09; Minneapolis Star Tribune, 3/28/09 (Attachments D & C).
    [Show full text]