DOCSLIB.ORG

Planning for Prosperity: First Nations, Intergovernmental Cooperation and Treaties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PLANNING FOR PROSPERITY: FIRST NATIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AND TREATIES A Leaders' Forum MORRIS J. WOSK CENTRE FOR DIALOGUE SEPTEMBER 9, 2004 Conveners: Mike Harcourt, Acting Chief Commissioner, BC Treaty Commission Tony Penikett, Gordon Foundation Senior Fellow, Simon Fraser University Presented in cooperation with: Supported by the Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..2 Agenda……………………………………………………………………………………………...3 Participants………………………………………………………………………………………...5 Opening Prayer……………………………………………………………………………………7 • Chief Leonard George, Tsleil-Waututh First Nation Welcome by Co-chairs…………………………………………………………………….............8 • Tony Penikett, Gordon Foundation Senior Fellow, Centre for Dialogue, SFU • Mike Harcourt, Acting Chief Commissioner, BC Treaty Commission Session I: Intergovernmental Relationships and Treaties: Lessons Learned Success Stories from Nisga'a and Yukon First Nations……………………………………..…10 • Barry Stuart, Former Chief Judge and Chief Negotiator, Government of the Yukon Territory • Edmond Wright, Secretary-Treasurer Nisga'a Lisims Government Roundtable Discussion…………………………………………………………………………...13 Planning Together: Experiences on the Way to Treaties – Part I………………….................16 • Mayor Colin Kinsley, City of Prince George • Chief Barry Seymour, Lheidli T'enneh First Nation • Finlay Sinclair, Manager of Special Projects & Communications, Regional District Fraser-Fort George Roundtable Discussion……………………………………………………………………..…….22 Planning Together: Experiences on the Way to Treaties – Part II…………………………...25 • L. Maynard Harry, Chief Councillor, Sliammon First Nation • Mayor Steward Alsgard, Corporation of the District of Powell River Roundtable Discussion…………………………………………………………………………...29 Working Lunch…………………………………………………………………………………..34 Session II: Creating Economic Opportunities Together Growing Communities: Taxation as a Tool……………………………………………………40 • Manny Jules, First Nations Fiscal Institutions Initiative, Indian Taxation Advisory Board • Chief Maureen Thomas, Tsleil-Waututh First Nation • Tim Raybould, Negotiator, Westbank First Nation • Doug McArthur, Professor, Public Policy Program, Simon Fraser University Roundtable Discussion…………………………….…………………………………………......52 Business Partnerships and Training…………………………………………………………….55 • Jo-ann Archibald, Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, UBC • Mayor John Slater, Town of Osoyoos • Lyn Brown, Director, Corporate Affairs & Social Responsibility, NorskeCanada • Michael Uehara, President, King Pacific Lodge Roundtable Discussion…………………………………………………………………………...68 Wrap-Up………………………………………………………………………………………….70 PLANNING FOR PROSPERITY: FIRST NATIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AND TREATIES PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Planning for Prosperity: First Nations, Intergovernmental Cooperation and Treaties is the fourth in a series of treaty-related conferences held at Simon Fraser University's Centre for Dialogue over the last two years. The first dialogue involved senior negotiators for all three parties to the BC treaty process and focused on what works and what doesn't in the current BC Treaty Commission negotiations. At the second conference, the negotiators returned to tackle key questions arising from the first conference, including: interim measures, dispute resolution techniques, the problem of prescriptive mandates and building the political will for treaty settlements. The third dialogue centred on one issue, Aboriginal self-government and the deep divide between First Nations and government policy makers on this question, the settlement of which will determine whether or not there will be new treaties in British Columbia. A joint initiative of the BC Treaty Commission and the Centre for Dialogue, the Planning for Prosperity conference brought together chiefs, mayors, business leaders and scholars. The conference began on a positive note with descriptions of the new relationships forged by the Nisga'a and Yukon treaty settlements. This tone continued with discussion of the healthy relationships developing between First Nations and municipalities in Osoyoos, Powell River and Prince George. Participants also dwelt on emerging partnerships between industry and Aboriginal communities, and such tools of development as education and taxation policy. In concentrating on the practicalities of planning together for their mutual advantage, this conference clearly demonstrated the benefits of respectful relationships between indigenous communities, local governments and regional economic leaders. A close reading of these proceedings might assist elected officials in areas, such as the Lower Mainland, where such healthy relationships have yet to be forged. All four of these dialogues are accessible on the Centre for Dialogue website (http://www.sfu.ca/dialogue/proceedings.htm) and all were sponsored by the Walter and Duncan Gordon Foundation. To the participants, our hosts and sponsors, we extend the convenors' appreciation for their contributions. The BC Treaty Commission hopes to be able to build on the dialogue we witnessed in this session at similar events in the future. Tony Penikett & Mike Harcourt PLANNING FOR PROSPERITY: FIRST NATIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AND TREATIES PAGE 2 AGENDA CONFERENCE AGENDA Planning for Prosperity: First Nations, Intergovernmental Cooperation and Treaties A Leaders' Forum September 9, 2004 Panel Sessions and Roundtable Discussions 8:00 am - 8:30 am Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 am - 8:45 am Opening Prayer • Chief Leonard George, Tsleil-Waututh First Nation Welcome by Co-chairs: • Tony Penikett, Gordon Foundation Senior Fellow, Centre for Dialogue, SFU • Mike Harcourt, Acting Chief Commissioner, BC Treaty Commission Session I: Intergovernmental Relationships and Treaties: Lessons Learned 8:45 am - 9:45 am Success Stories from Nisga'a and Yukon First Nations • Barry Stuart, Former Chief Judge and Chief Negotiator, Government of the Yukon Territory • Edmond Wright, Secretary-Treasurer Nisga'a Lisims Government Roundtable Discussion 10:00 am - 11:00 am Planning Together: Experiences on the Way to Treaties – Part I • Mayor Colin Kinsley, City of Prince George • Chief Barry Seymour, Lheidli T'enneh First Nation • Finlay Sinclair, Manager of Special Projects and Communications, Regional District Fraser-Fort George Roundtable Discussion 11:00 am - 12:00 pm Planning Together: Experiences on the Way to Treaties – Part II • L. Maynard Harry, Chief Councillor, Sliammon First Nation • Mayor Steward Alsgard, Corporation of the District of Powell River Roundtable Discussion 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm Working Lunch PLANNING FOR PROSPERITY: FIRST NATIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AND TREATIES PAGE 3 AGENDA Session II: Creating Economic Opportunities Together 1:00 pm - 2:30pm Growing Communities: Taxation as a Tool • Manny Jules, First Nations Fiscal Institutions Initiative, Indian Taxation Advisory Board • Chief Maureen Thomas, Tsleil-Waututh First Nation • Tim Raybould, Negotiator, Westbank First Nation • Doug McArthur, Professor, Public Policy Program, Simon Fraser University Roundtable Discussion 2:30 pm - 2:45pm Refreshment Break 2:45 pm - 4:15pm Business Partnerships and Training • Jo-ann Archibald, Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, UBC • Mayor John Slater, Town of Osoyoos • Lyn Brown, Director, Corporate Affairs & Social Responsibility, NorskeCanada • Michael Uehara, President, King Pacific Lodge Roundtable Discussion 4:15 pm - 4:30 pm Wrap-Up PLANNING FOR PROSPERITY: FIRST NATIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AND TREATIES PAGE 4 CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS 1. Stewart Alsgard Mayor, Corporation of the District of Powell River 2. Martha Anslow Manager, Local Government - First Nations Relations, Ministry of Community, Aboriginal and Women's Services, Government of BC 3. Jo-ann Archibald Associate Professor, Faculty of Education, UBC 4. Mel Bevan Northwest Tribal Treaty Group of Northern British Columbia 5. Kevin Blaney President, Sliammon Development Corporation; Councillor Sliammon First Nation 6. Lyn Brown Director, Corporate Affairs and Social Responsibility, NorskeCanada 7. Cheryl Casimer Negotiator, Ktunaxa Kinbasket Tribal Council 8. Jack Ebbels Deputy Minister, Ministry of Energy and Mines, Province of British Columbia 9. Dave Formosa Economic Development Consultant, Sliammon Development Corporation 10. Mike Furey Assistant Deputy Minister, Treaty Negotiations Office, Ministry of Attorney and Ministry Responsible for Treaty Negotiations 11. Chief Leonard George Tsleil-Waututh First Nation 12. L. Maynard Harry Chief Councillor, Sliammon First Nation 13. Manny Jules First Nations Fiscal Institutions Initiative, Indian Taxation Advisory Board 14. Colin Kinsley Mayor, City of Prince George 15. Rick Krehbiel Lheidli T'enneh First Nation 16. Tom Mann Director, Regional District of Central Kootenay PLANNING FOR PROSPERITY: FIRST NATIONS, INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AND TREATIES PAGE 5 CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS 17. Doug McArthur Professor, Public Policy Program, Simon Fraser University 18. Rick McDougall Acting Manager, Aboriginal Relations, BC Hydro 19. Alison McNeil Senior Policy Analyst, Union of British Columbia Municipalities (UBCM) 20. Tony Penikett Gordon Foundation Senior Fellow, Centre for Dialogue, SFU 21. Marino Piombini Senior Planner (Aboriginal Affairs), Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) 22. Kirsteen Pirie Manager, Lower Mainland Treaty Advisory Committee (LMTAC) 23. Tim Raybould
Recommended publications
  • TONY PENIKETT 550 Beatty Street, Unit 7-8, Vancouver, BC, V6B 2L3, Canada (604) 724-6720 E-Mail: Tony.Penikett@Gmail.Com ______

    TONY PENIKETT 550 Beatty Street, Unit 7-8, Vancouver, BC, V6B 2L3, Canada (604) 724-6720 E-Mail: [email protected] ______

    CURRICULUM VITAE (short version) TONY PENIKETT 550 Beatty Street, Unit 7-8, Vancouver, BC, V6B 2L3, Canada (604) 724-6720 e-mail: [email protected] ___________________________________________________________ WORK HISTORY Principal, Tony Penikett Negotiations Inc., June 2001 - Mediation, negotiation, facilitation, strategic analysis in aboriginal, labour and intergovernmental negotiations. Senior Associate, Simon Fraser University Centre for Dialogue, 2017 - Panelist, Federal Ministerial Panel to review NEB Report on the Kinder-Morgan TMX Pipeline Project. May-November 2016 Mentor, Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation, Montreal, 2016-2018 Mentor, Jane Glassco Northern Fellows, Walter and Gordon Charitable Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, 2015- Fulbright Scholar: Research Chair in Arctic Studies Henry M. Jackson School of International Studies, University of Washington, Seattle, USA, 2013-14 Visiting Professor, School of Public Policy, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, 2006- 2018 Senior Fellow, Treaty Project Research, Simon Fraser University Centre for Dialogue, Vancouver, 2001-2005 Deputy Minister responsible for Aboriginal and Public Sector Union Negotiations and, later, Deputy of Labour, BC Government, Victoria, Dec 1997 - June 2001 Senior Policy Advisor, Cabinet Planning Unit, and Chief Negotiator, Northern Mine projects, Government of Saskatchewan, Regina, Aug 1995 - Dec 1997 Member of the Yukon Legislative Assembly, Whitehorse 1978-1995 BOOKS PUBLISHED Tony Penikett, Hunting the Northern Character, UBC Press, 2018 Tony Penikett,
  • Overlap": Causes and Implications of Contested Indigenous Claims to Territory in the Context of the Bc Treaty Process

    Overlap": Causes and Implications of Contested Indigenous Claims to Territory in the Context of the Bc Treaty Process

    "OVERLAP": CAUSES AND IMPLICATIONS OF CONTESTED INDIGENOUS CLAIMS TO TERRITORY IN THE CONTEXT OF THE BC TREATY PROCESS by R.G. Christopher Turner B. General Studies, Thomson Rivers University THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES (GEOGRAPHY) UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA June 2011 © R. G. Christopher Turner, 2011 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du 1+1 Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87546-9 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-87546-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distrbute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
  • JSIS 482A/582B Arctic Insecurities

    JSIS 482A/582B Arctic Insecurities

    JSIS 482A/582B Arctic Insecurities Thursdays, 3:30-5:30 p.m., (3 credits) Tony Penikett, 2013-14 U.W. Canada Fulbright Visiting Chair in Arctic Studies MGH 278 This course will address the range of Arctic insecurities from the Cold War security paradigm to environmental and human security (Arctic Council's Search and Rescue Agreement); Aboriginal land claims (Alaska, Canada, Greenland) to Indigenous Internationalism (Inuit Circumpolar Council, the Saami Convention); the Finnish Initiative to the Arctic Council, Permanent Participants and Observers (China, India, etc); seabed resources, the Arctic Five (UN Convention of the Law of the Sea) and the Circumpolar Inuit Declaration on Sovereignty in the Arctic; national and regional resource mega-projects, devolution and local development; the Arctic Treaty idea (EU) versus the reality of an evolving network of interlocking relationships (Arctic Governance Project); and, American and Canadian management of these Arctic issues. This graduate seminar will also examine a series of Arctic policy questions with the ultimate aim of assembling a set of papers into a collection for publication. Tony Penikett, a Vancouver-based mediator, served in politics for 25 years including two years in Ottawa as Chief of Staff to federal New Democratic Party Leader Ed Broadbent MP; five terms in the Yukon Legislative Assembly; and two terms as Premier of Canada's Yukon Territory (1985-92). His government negotiated final agreement for First Nation land claims in the territory and passed pioneering education, health, language legislation, as well as leading a much- admired bottom-up economic planning process. After serving as Premier of the Yukon, Penikett acted as Senior Aboriginal Policy Advisor for the Premier of Saskatchewan (1995-97) and, Deputy Minister for Negotiations, and later Labour, for the Government of British Columbia (1997-2001).
  • Twenty-Two Years of Aboriginal Teacher Education in the Yukon

    Twenty-Two Years of Aboriginal Teacher Education in the Yukon

    Honouring the Past, Touching the Future: Twenty-Two Years of Aboriginal Teacher Education in the Yukon Lori Patterson Eastmure Abstract: Recommendations for a Yukon First Nations focused teacher education program date back to 1972; however, this was not acted on until 1989 with the establishment of the Yukon Native Teacher Education Program (YNTEP). Though a ground-breaking initiative in First Nations’ education in the Yukon, YNTEP is not unique. It is one of many small Aboriginal teacher training programs established in various Canadian locations since the 1960s, as community-based teacher training opportunities reflecting local needs in largely Aboriginal communities. This article provides a detailed history of YNTEP set within the historical context of Aboriginal teacher education in western and northern Canada and in relation to the historical and political context of the Yukon at the time of YNTEP’s founding. This includes a short history of public education as it pertains to Yukon First Nations—from mission schools to public schools to post-secondary training and education. I argue thatYNTEP, as the first degree program in the Yukon specifically for students of First Nations ancestry, is one of the first tangible realizations of early land claims commitments and that the establishment of this program is a credit to two fronts: unwavering Yukon First Nations leadership, and forward-thinking government officials and educators of the time who recognized that the continuing colonization processes in public school education would not change without the influence of Yukon First Nations educators. It is often said that when it comes to initiating a new idea, timing is everything.
  • General Overview

    General Overview

    General Overview Benefits of a treaty A treaty with Tla’amin Nation (Sliammon First Nation) will bring certainty with respect to all of Tla’amin Nation’s Aboriginal rights throughout Tla’amin’s claimed traditional territory, which covers approximately 609,000 hectares including marine areas. It will provide Tla’amin with the modern governance tools to build strong and workable relationships with federal, provincial and local governments. Canada, British Columbia and Tla’amin Nation expect that a treaty will resolve long-standing issues regarding undefined Aboriginal rights and title, and bring certainty and economic benefits not only to Tla’amin members but to the entire region. Tla’amin Nation government The Tla’amin Nation Final Agreement will operate within the framework of the Constitution of Canada, and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms will apply to the Tla’amin Nation government. With the exception of determining Indian status, after a transition period the Indian Act will no longer apply to Tla’amin Nation, its lands or members. Instead, constitutionally-protected self-government provisions will enable Tla’amin to make its own decisions on matters related to the preservation of its culture, the exercise of its treaty rights and the operation of its government. In October 2009, the Tla’amin community ratified a constitution in accordance with the treaty. The constitution provides that the Tla’amin Nation government will be democratically and financially accountable to its members. The Tla’amin constitution will come into force on the effective date of the treaty. Residents on Tla’amin Lands who are not Tla’amin Nation members may participate in the decision-making processes of a Tla’amin public institution, such as a school or health board, if the activities of that institution directly and significantly affect them.
  • Duncan Lake): a Draft Report

    Duncan Lake): a Draft Report

    Tse Keh Nay Traditional and Contemporary Use and Occupation at Amazay (Duncan Lake): A Draft Report Amazay Lake Photo by Patrice Halley Draft Submission to the Kemess North Joint Review Panel May, 2007 Report Prepared By: Loraine Littlefield Linda Dorricott Deidre Cullon With Contributions By: Jessica Place Pam Tobin On Behalf of the Tse Keh Nay ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was written under the direction of the Tse Keh Nay leaders. The authors would like to thank Grand Chief Gordon Pierre and Chief Johnny Pierre of the Tsay Keh Dene First Nation; Chief John Allen French of the Takla Lake First Nation and Chief Donny Van Somer of the Kwadacha First Nation for their support and guidance throughout this project. The authors are particularly indebted to the advisors for this report who took the time to meet with us on very short notice and who generously shared with us their knowledge of Tse Keh Nay history, land and culture. We hope that this report accurately reflects this knowledge. We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of Grand Chief Gordon Pierre, Ray Izony, Bill Poole, Trevor Tomah, Jean Isaac, Robert Tomah, Chief John Allen French, Josephine West, Frank Williams, Cecilia Williams, Lillian Johnny, Hilda George and Fred Patrick. We would also like to thank the staff at the Prince George band and treaty offices for assembling and providing us with the documents, reports, maps and other materials that were used in this report. J.P. Laplante, Michelle Lochhead, Karl Sturmanis, Kathaleigh George, and Henry Joseph all provided valuable assistance and support to the project.
  • A 'Literacy Test' for Indigenous Government?

    A 'Literacy Test' for Indigenous Government?

    GOVERNANCE A ‘literacy test’ for Indigenous government? Tony Penikett n January 27th, 2011, Canada’s minister of powers fought for the rest of North America. The Aboriginal affairs, John Duncan, told CBC British, Dutch, French and Spanish all actively NOorth that the Nunavut Territory, a jurisdiction sought allies among Indian nations who were too whose population is 84 per cent Inuit, was “not at the weak to fight off the invaders, but too strong to be stage of readiness” to assume responsibility for man- ignored. After British and Iroquois forces defeated aging their lands—lands they have occupied for cen- the French army at the Battle of the Plains of Abra- turies. With this brief intervention, the minister ham in 1759, and the conclusion of the Seven Years' joined a 490-year-old debate about the capacities of War, France signed the Treaty of Paris in 1763, ced- Indigenous peoples to govern themselves and their ing all lands east of the Mississippi to the British. lands—a debate dominated, until recently, by privi- This outcome angered former French allies, leged white males such as the minister and myself. among them the Ottawas. An Ottawa warrior chief, The debate began after 1519, when conquista- Pontiac, began to preach resistance to the British oc- dor Hernán Cortés attacked and destroyed Tenochti- cupation of tribal lands among the Indian nations of tlán, then the world’s largest city and capital of the the western great lakes region. In May 1763, Pon- Aztec Confederacy. Nicolo Machiavelli, a contem- tiac’s army quickly captured nine British forts.
  • Arctic Indigenous Rights, Lands, and Jurisdiction?

    Arctic Indigenous Rights, Lands, and Jurisdiction?

    An Unfinished Journey: Arctic Indigenous Rights, Lands, and Jurisdiction? Tony Penikett I. INTRODUCTION Yellowknife-Dene political scientist Glen Coulthard sums up the goals of the indigenous rights movement Idle No More1 as a struggle for land and jurisdiction.2 Over the last forty years, American and Canadian governments made much progress on the land question in the Arctic and sub-Arctic; however, from an irrational fear of the unknown, politicians in Washington, D.C. and Ottawa have effectively blocked the pathways to aboriginal jurisdiction or self-government. In Arctic North America, indigenous land issues have largely been settled, but indigenous govern- ments still seek to restore jurisdiction over their lands and citizens. Dur- ing the late-twentieth century in the Yukon, Northwest Territories, and Nunavut, as well as in Nisga’a territory in the northwest corner of British Columbia, First Nations negotiated provincial and local government powers. But, faced with both federal and provincial opposition, conti- nent-wide progress on the question of indigenous jurisdiction has since stalled. First Nations want land and jurisdiction—American and Canadian governments have granted some land but not much jurisdiction. If the 1. “Idle No More” is an ongoing protest movement, which began in December 2012, originat- ing among the Aboriginal peoples in Canada comprising the First Nations, Métis, and Inuit peoples and their non-Aboriginal supporters in Canada, and to a lesser extent, internationally. Idle No More calls on all people to join in a peaceful revolution to honor indigenous sovereignty and to protect the land and water. It has consisted of a number of political actions worldwide, inspired in part by the liquid diet hunger strike of Attawapiskat Chief Theresa Spence and further coordinated via social media.
  • Dissertation Proposal

    Dissertation Proposal

    Deal? Or No Deal? Explaining Comprehensive Land Claims Negotiation Outcomes in Canada. by Christopher Alcantara A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctorate in Philosophy Graduate Department of Political Science University of Toronto © Copyright by Christopher Alcantara (2008) Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-57952-7 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-57952-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation.
  • 2009 Annual Report

    2009 Annual Report

    Annual Report bc treaty commission / www.bctreaty.net 2009 treaty commission annual report 2009 | B treaty commission annual report 2009 | 1 2 4 8 12 16 32 letter from our the year looking table about the treaty the chief purpose in review forward reports commission commissioner treaty commission annual report 2009 | 2 Letter from the Chief Commissioner One response to this concern was the development of the Common Table, a group comprising representatives of Canada, BC and more than 60 First Nations that met in mid-2008. This Table was tasked with identifying obstacles, addressing barriers and promoting the speedy conclusion of fair and viable agreements based on the recognition and reconciliation of aboriginal title and rights. The participants were expected to take the outcomes of the Most of the accomplishments in my life were made work to their respective decision-makers for consideration possible by the gifts of wisdom and advice I received and direction. Regrettably, the opportunities identified to from elders and others and through learning our history. break down the barriers preventing progress are slow to I believe that, in part, our ability to successfully steer materialize. the BC treaty process through the next stage of its development requires some reflection on where we’ve During the past year, the provincial government and been and what we’ve learned. First Nations, both in and outside the treaty process have engaged in discussions on how more substantive and In 1994, the Treaty Commission issued its first annual tangible progress can be made on the ‘new relationship’. report which included this statement, “The Commission- Among the options explored was a recognition and ers recognize that the treaty making process holds great reconciliation act.
  • August 2007 Elders Voice

    August 2007 Elders Voice

    Volume 7 Issue 9 31st Annual BC Elders Gathering Contact Information for the Host is on the back page of every issue August 2007 of the EV. Forms for the event can be found at www.bcelders.com as well as the Host’s own site www.eldersgathering.squamish.net I wish everyone safe travels to and from the Gathering, D. Stirling _____________________________________________________ ATTENTION ELDERS AND ELDERS SUPPOPT PEOPLE: Please take special note of pages 10 and 11 as they are from Services Canada who will be responsible for processing the Residential School Settlements. As was explained to me… Any of you who applied for the ‘Advanced Payment’ will still need to fill out the NEW APPLICATION FORM when it becomes available. I was told that assuming that the process proceeds after the mandatory 150 day opt-out phase (which ends August 20th, 2007) the application forms will be made available 30 days after that and will be mailed out on September 17, 2007. Services Canada will be accepting the filled out applications on September 19th, 2007. You can contact Services Canada to get on their mailout for the New Applica- tion Forms at 1-866-879-4913 or at www.residentialschoolsettlement.ca Sincerely, Donna Stirling “Angels fly because they take themselves lightly.” Inside this issue Pgs. 12-15: FN Leadership Council In- formation Bulletin - July 2007 issue Easy Bakers Corner/Handy 2 Pgs. 16-17: Elders and Sleeping Pills Tips/Website Information Pg. 18: Elders and Weight Training List of Paid Support Fees 3 Pg. 19: How to Reduce Your Chance of Having A Stroke FNLC : National Day of Action 4 Pg.
  • Indigenous Autochtone

    Indigenous Autochtone

    published by the canadian institute of planners | publié par l’institut canadien des urbanistes winter/ hiver 2016 vol. 56 no. 4 vol.no. 56 Indigenous Planning Urbanisme autochtone publication agreement 40064978 cip-icu.ca FACILITIES ENVIRONMENT INFRASTRUCTURE COMMUNITIES 822502_Dillon.indd 1 18/07/16 9:52 pm Community Planning WE SEE Land Development THRIVING Urban Design Community Engagement COMMUNITIES Geospatial Analysis & Web Design 798253_WSP.indd 1 05/04/16 3:45 am CONTENTS SOMMAIRE Indigenous Urbanisme Planning autochtone plan canada | winter · Hiver 2016 vol. 56 no. 4 COLUMNS ARTICLES 41 FROM REACTIVE TO PROACTIVE IN FIRST NATIONS PLANNING: A 4 WORD FROM THE 16 PRIVILEGING INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE CASE STUDY OF THE METLAKATLA PRESIDENT | MESSAGE Q&A from the participants of EXPERIENCE IN BRITISH COLUMBIA DE LA PRÉSIDENTE RAIC’s Indigenous Task Force By Katerina Kwon MCIP, By Patrick Stewart, Luugigyoo (Nisga`a), Thomas Gunton MCIP, RPP, PLANNER UPDATE | 6 PhD, Architect AIBC, MRAIC, LEED®AP Murray Rutherford MCIP, RPP, and L’ACTUALITÉ DES and Eladia Smoke, KaaSheGaaBaaWeak Taylor Zeeg MCIP, RPP URBANISTES (Anishinaabe), OAA, MRAIC, LEED®AP 46 A ROADMAP TO INDEPENDENCE: 12 FROM THE EDITORIAL 18 (RE)IMAGINING OUR COMMUNITY: THE K’ÓMOKS FIRST NATION’S BOARD | MESSAGE DU CHANGING THE PLANNER AND PROACTIVE APPROACH TO COMITÉ DE RÉDACTION PLANNING WITH FIRST NATIONS YOUTH SUSTAINABLE LAND MANAGEMENT By Shelagh McCartney D.Des. OAA, MRAIC, By Alanna Mitchell, 70 FELLOWS’ CORNER | Elizabeth Atlookan, Louie Sugarhead, Pamela Shaw PhD, MCIP, RPP, FRCGS, DU CÔTES DES FELLOWS Jeffrey Herskovits, Kathryn Trnavsky and Devon Miller, MSc, LEED AP ND 73 PLANNER’S BOOKSHELF 22 TREATY PRINCIPLES ARE PLANNING 49 WAYS OF KNOWING: ENGAGING IN PRINCIPLES: LEARNING FROM THE PARTNERSHIP FOR INDIGENOUS 74 ADVERTISER.COM EXPERIENCES OF MANITOBAN PLANNING EDUCATION PLANNING PRACTITIONERS By Leonie Sandercock PhD, By Madeleine Koch MCP, MCIP Candidate Leona M.